Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Replacing Matt Hasselbeck

Hasselbeck_medium

Fail personified.

 

The new GM is here, the coaching staff is just about complete, and Seattle is ready to approach the offseason. This offseason is even more important than last year's because the Seahawks are starting over. Mike Holmgren's staff from his last season as coach is gone. Jim Mora's offensive staff is finito. It's now back to square 1 in building a contender.

There is no doubt the most important issue heading into free agency and the NFL Draft is the situation at QB. Right now Matt Hasselbeck is our starter. In my opinion he will stay with the team heading into training camp. For the first time in his career however, there is significant uncertainty about whether or not he's going to hold down that job next season. Three out of the last four years we have seen Hasselbeck suck, get injured, or a combination of the two. During the final 4 games of last season he threw 4 touchdowns and 10 interceptions against the 18th (Houston), 10th (Tampa Bay), 5th (Green Bay), and 31st (Tennessee) ranked secondaries. From December 13th to January 3rd, the Seahawks played the worst football of any team. The case could be made that they were the worst team in the NFL during that timespan; not necessarily by record but by the quality of play.

Hasselbeck played a role in the three blowout losses by quickly pissing away possession via tossing interceptions or finding a creative way to fumble against Tampa Bay. He then finished off his turdbomb of a season by throwing an interception against Tennessee in a sheer moment of panic and desperation.

I think change has to come before it gets to the point where Hasselbeck is being trotted out there because he's Matt Hasselbeck. John Schneider has many ways of approaching the replacement of the franchise's greatest ever QB come September 2010. When I mean "replace", I mean the premise of this article involves him losing his starting job before the regular season begins.

Star-divide

 

 

Option 1: Matt Hasselbeck Remains the Starter

 

The Seahawks could take a gamble for the 3rd straight year and bank on a healthy Matt Hasselbeck. With that is the assumption that he will also be competent. Mike Teel and Seneca Wallace remain his backups and never really pose a threat towards taking his job. Seattle doesn't draft a QB and keeps this part of the roster intact.

There is only one way for this to work and that is to build around him and pray that he doesn't willingly dive into Patrick Willis' flying elbow. He proves to the NFL there is still life in the old dog and leads Seattle to one more shot at the Super Bowl under his wings.

 


Option 2: Start Seneca Wallace or Mike Teel

 

If Santa is kind, he'll give me an early Christmas gift, and send Seneca elsewhere. I'll run around naked at Westlake Mall if Teel is the starter for our 1st regular season game.

 

 

Option 3: Sign a Free Agent Quarterback

 

Choices: Kyle Orton, Jason Campbell, Chad Pennington, Tavaris Jackson, Kellen Clemens, Charlie Batch, David Carr, Brodie Croyle, Daunte Culpepper, Rex Grossman, Joey Harrington, Jon Kitna, and Chris Redman.

Those are your top options in free agency. It's highly unlikely Jason Campbell leaves Washington.

 

Option 4a: Draft a Quarterback (Rounds 1-2)

 

This isn't the most talented QB class in the world, but there are enough options available in the first two rounds for the Seattle Seahawks to choose from. Jimmy Clausen, Sam Bradford, Tim Tebow (NO!!!!), and Tony Pike are projected to be chosen in the first two rounds. Clausen, Bradford, and Tebow could end up being nabbed within the top 16 selections, while Pike drops to the early 2nd round. Drafting a QB and plopping him straight into the starting job is always risky, but keep on believing that we get that quarterback -- someone like Matt Ryan -- who has good success right off the bat. I understand Ryan is a rare kind, but that won't stop me from believing we can get one ourselves.

 

Option 4b: Draft a Quarterback (Rounds 3-7, Undrafteds)

 

Normally when a QB is drafted in the later rounds the chances of winning the starting job before the season starts is slim and none. They would have to kick ass in a QB competition during camp and/or badly outperform the competition during preseason. Otherwise their best hope of getting in is if the starter(s) ahead of them come down with an injury. Sean Canfield, Colt McCoy, Jevan Snead (NO!!!!), Dan Lefevour, Max Hall, Zac Robinson, Jonathan Crompton, etc. will be available for service during these rounds as additional project QBs.

 

Option 5: Trade for Someone

 

It would be best not to come up with wacky scenarios and make idiotic and mindless speculation for the sake of figuring out which starting caliber QB can be traded to Seattle.

 

 

I'm not saying Hasselbeck will get replaced as starter this season, but I do see the following options as ways to do so in case this actually happens. For the time being I believe Hasselbeck will be kept on the roster and at a minimum Schneider will draft a quarterback, who in turn will be an Matt's understudy.

This is obviously just one aspect of the rebuilding phase, but it's something that needs significant attention from the organization, and if it's still Hasselbeck then we'll likely be watching 16 more games of the picture above.

Comment 24 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

To me the key thing is cutting Seneca.

That would tidy things up and give an early draft pick his shot at out-playing Matt early on. However, it seems unlikely that Matt would get benched. If we grab Clausen/Bradford/whoever and the staff believes in that guy enough, we may just have seen the last of MattBeck (via trade i would think).

More importantly than Seneca not being a contender for starter, however, is that whoever Matt’s backup is in 2010 WILL play. Based on what we know about Hass, he won’t start 16 games this season. That would give (BrandNewQuarterback) a shot at showing what he can do as well as giving him some starting experience.

From what I understand from scouting reports, I think it’s unlikely that we draft someone who’s much of an improvement over seriously-declined Matt in 2010. Therefore, the best thing we can do is avoid starting Seneca.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jan 28, 2010 11:28 PM PST reply actions  

In addition, free agency isn't too promising.

As far as improving the position.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jan 28, 2010 11:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I read this article, and I'm convinced you're spying on my emails

My buddy and I went back and forth on this issue and my final email on the topic was very similar to this post (though I’ll admit your post is a bit more in-depth, hehe).

From a pure “building for the future” standpoint, I see little value in keeping Hasselbeck, especially if he can fetch a 4th round draft pick from some desperate team (hell, Kitna fetched a 5th when he was 37). Seattle won’t contend in the 2010/11 season, so why keep him if he’s got inherent value? Especially since he’s only got one season left on his contract.

On the other hand, however, the NFL is a business and businesses need to make money. Dumping the face of the franchise for a mid-round pick would have season ticket holders up in arms.

It’s most likely he starts this coming season and remains the starter unless he’s knocked out or he’s completely and utterly terrible.

6/14/40. Sweet.

by Nick Andron on Jan 29, 2010 8:06 AM PST reply actions  

Dumping him on another team would be ripping the bandage off.

They would have that much more time to realize that we suck, and to get used to the idea of rebuilding.

by cashless on Jan 29, 2010 12:32 PM PST up reply actions  

The bandage is the old QB and the rookie is the wound underneath

You either slowly peel of the bandage to give time for the wound to heal. Or you tear off the bandage and hope it doesn’t bleed for too long.

Just rip it off.

6/14/40. Sweet.

by Nick Andron on Jan 29, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree, just rip it off.

But I’m expecting Matt to play and I’ll cheer my brains out for him all season.

by cashless on Jan 29, 2010 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Business ramifications

Continuing to suck, and especially continuing to suck with a starting quarterback who has next to zero chance of ever not sucking again, would be the worst possible business outcome for the Seahawks. People (including myself) love Hasselbeck for what he’s done for the team, but fans don’t watch games in which their team has no chance of winning. We will continue to have way too many such games until we have a QB who can make NFL-calibre throws.

Starting Beck as a new guy watches early next year may not be a terrible option. But resources must be invested so that it is clear that we have a successor for Beck. When he goes down, which he almost certainly will, the new guy needs to come in and start the growing pain process. That will suck in its own way, but it will suck less because there will be hope for the future.

by jeager on Jan 29, 2010 11:19 AM PST reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

The pain watching a high-potential yet inexperienced rookie QB is far different (and typically necessary and expected by football fans).

Drawing out the pain of a QB that’s no longer NFL-able to put off the pain of a new QB just makes things 2x worse.

6/14/40. Sweet.

by Nick Andron on Jan 29, 2010 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

SeneCat trade rumors

I seem to remember there was at least rumors about interest in Seneca before last season. Assuming true, what is preceived value of a backup QB? What could we trade him for in terms of draft picks (if any)?

While Seneca is not good, he is a mildly functional backup QB who gives a solid offensive team a chance to win if the top QB goes down. Basically Kitna with the competency to sack himself or panic into a turnover.

Shanghai Kelly's on Polk St. in San Francisco is the worst bar on the face of the earth (at least on Sunday mornings).

by elfaro47 on Jan 29, 2010 11:25 AM PST reply actions  

The thing is he's shown such poor play

I’d be terrified to see him play even worse than he already has.

Brian Russell would bite on play-action despite the QB being in an empty backfield.

by SSreporters on Jan 29, 2010 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

Basically Kitna with the competency to sack himself or panic into a turnover.

I wasn’t unintentionally leaving out a word in that sentence. Seneca proved himself hand-off worthy, a threat (credible or not) in the SeneCat formation, but that’s about it. Seneca is signed for the league avg for his position and is a league average backup QB. Hard to say which is worth more: having $1.5M for FAs or swap Seneca for another player of equal “upside” value.

Shanghai Kelly's on Polk St. in San Francisco is the worst bar on the face of the earth (at least on Sunday mornings).

by elfaro47 on Jan 29, 2010 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I doubt we move Hass this offseason

It seems unlikely to me that the front office wants to deal with the flak of dealing or cutting the guy who has been pretty much the face of the franchise for such a long time, because (as someone said) there are lots of loyal Hass fans out there who would be very unhappy.

I’m thinking they’ll draft someone and let them sit behind Hass. If Hass stinks it up, in goes the rookie, and the FO will look justified in doing so.

by djafrot on Jan 29, 2010 2:55 PM PST reply actions  

Such a terrible reason to keep him, but likely that'll be the reasoning that Hass stays.

Let’s face it, he probably still sells tickets because the majority of fans are convinced that it’s the o-line’s fault that he’s stinking it up.

6/14/40. Sweet.

by Nick Andron on Feb 1, 2010 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

For some reason option 2 makes me happy

Mike Teel is the type of QB that PC has succeeded with. He didn’t blow anyone away in preseason last year, but you can’t really write him off for that. Nobody really understood the offense at that point. His college line was good but not great, relative to the competition:
YEAR TEAM CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2005 RUTG 51 101 50.5 683 6.8 2 38 10 94.03
2006 RUTG 164 296 55.4 2135 7.2 12 74 13 120.59
2007 RUTG 203 349 58.2 3162 9.1 20 69 13 145.73
2008 RUTG 243 396 61.4 3418 8.6 25 93 13 148.13
4A is risky this year with the second tier QB talent available, especially with how much D talent is available and I don’t think that anyone as good as K. Kolb will be traded.
Matt will start the season, get hurt by week 3 and Teel will get an honest chance to save the season.
It’s the cheapest option available and if you improve the D and the run game through the draft and FA, then it has potential to succeed in the long run.

by stufr on Jan 30, 2010 6:19 AM PST reply actions  

Yes, yes!

Please yes!! I really want to see Teel in a regular season game. I know it’s unreasonable but I think it’s because Hasselbeck has made me pine for a Seattle QB with a good arm. I at least have to know whether or not Teel can really be good.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jan 31, 2010 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

But that would be throwing in the towel.

Brian Russell would bite on play-action despite the QB being in an empty backfield.

by SSreporters on Jan 31, 2010 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I assume you mean last year

I still think he is a viable option for the future.

by stufr on Feb 1, 2010 3:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Woosh

Hehe. It was a reference to Mora’s reasoning, even when the playoffs were statistically impossible, to not feel out new players for an eye on the future.

6/14/40. Sweet.

by Nick Andron on Feb 1, 2010 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Jarrett Brown

I’d like to see them take Jarrett Brown in the 3rd round and then train him up for a year or two and see how that turns out.

Falcons, Seahawks, Huskers!

by Seadogs on Feb 3, 2010 7:12 AM PST reply actions  

I actually have liked him in the small amount that I have seen

But what do you see in him that makes it worth it to draft him instead of just trying out Teel. His numbers in college are definitely not better.

by stufr on Feb 3, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows

Recent FanPosts

8b0726ecf3b3e299b1fbdfefb4ec9922_small
Interview with TE, John Nalbone from ProInterviews
Photo_on_2011-10-14_at_23
Jim Harbaugh Vs. Pete Carroll
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill