Home of the Beast Force Backfield
I picked up a book I bought a while back, Contempt, and began to read it last night. It's written like this:
I walked towards the window, thinking jumbled thoughts of loves past, my feet felt pricks of nerves coming alive, which, in fact, they were not; but they were reminding me they were there, and I should feel them, feel pain, if only for a vanishing instance; and I looked out the window and saw the sun vanishing over the Vtlava River.
Ok, so it's not that bad and it doesn't take place in Prague, but it's sort of stuttering like that with lots of clauses and asides and contemplative framing of seemingly normal events. The book isn't very old, about a half century, and it's not some quickly forgotten trifle, it's considered a classic of sorts, but Alberto Moravia's prose is well, aged seeming. It seems outdated and poorly tuned to the modern ear.
Or maybe I read too many blogs.
Commas are falling out fashion. Modern writing in general is very mindful of its readers' short attention span. I've adjusted my writing, especially these sort of scouting pieces, to be terse and to the point, while my personal writing is busy and dense.
Why do I mention this? I surely lost some readers around the word "book." I mention this because I connect almost everything in my life to football, and reading something so out of time got me thinking about what is timeless in football and what is forever changing. It got me thinking about this quote I found in an old copy of National Geographic:
During mass extinctions the rules change. What had been advantageous may suddenly become a liability. --Jack Sepkoski
Not an entirely original thought there, but accurate.
Workhorse backs like Marshawn Lynch are dying out. That's been my assumption for some time. In a passing league, in which receiving and blocking are as important to a back as running the ball, there's vanishing value in the everydown masher that pushes the pile, breaks tackles, etc. Backs, like defensive tackles, should be fresh and have specialized skills and work in a committee and if any one back doesn't break one hundred yards rushing, that essential milestone, it doesn't matter.
And I think that's probably true. A team doesn't need an everydown back anymore, but though styles change, and back usage is a stylistic change, quality is timeless. Lynch may not profile like a "modern" running back, he's a sturdy generalist rather than a dynamic specialist, but his talent is timeless. Seattle may not need Lynch to take every carry. His stamina and durability may not be the vital assets they once were. Lynch may not tote the rock until he breaks important seeming milestones, but his talent his performance, like an evocative story however written, is undeniable. In the hurry to square and define Lynch, his value relative to his cost, talent of all things was something I didn't emphasize enough. Dude's called Beast for a reason.
Still with me?
To the notes:
We left with Chicago closing to within four following a field goal.
- I worried that Matt Hasselbeck might not have the wheels to execute roll outs. I would have to look back through my notes to determine this for sure, but I don't think roll outs have been particularly effective for Seattle.
- First play of the drive, Matt fakes hand off and rolls right. Israel Idonije chases in and is initially blocked but breaks free and closes on Hasselbeck. I don't think of the soon to be 30 year old end as particularly fast, especially not relative to outside linebackers that sometimes close on roll outs, but he's fast enough to force Hass out of his roll out and into throwing the ball away at Chris Baker's feet.
- Lynch run. Nothing wild. Okie and Ham Fighter team up and block Matt Toeaina into the turf, but the scrum closes around Lynch and the Bears force third and nine.
- The stalled drive is consummated when Hasselbeck targets John Carlson underneath and he's quickly wrapped short of the first. Run this play and target Carlson one thousand times and 997, he's tackled short. The other three, Carlson drops it.
Bears ball.
- At this point, what we perceive as momentum is definitely shifting. The Bears had forced a three and out and were about to construct a respectable drive. My memory of this game is that Seattle sort of ran away with it, even though the score never indicated as much, but it was actually very close for a good long time.
- Matt Forte curls to receive and three Bears offensive lineman form an arrow pattern in front, ready to gash Seattle with yet another effective screen pass. Behind this frightening development are three fallen Sehaawks: Kentwan Balmer, Craig Terrill and Raheem Brock. Roy Lewis was out of position on a nickel blitz. Colin Cole was upright but, well, Cccooollliiinnn Cccooollleee, if you dig. And so the Bears gashed Seattle up the right sideline for 19. Lawyer Milloy, and who else, right? makes the saving tackle.
- Seahawks rush four, their front four, generate no pressure; Devin Hester crosses in front of Will Herring and is free and has a mismatch, though Herring is, for all intents and purposes, executing his assignment, but Jay Cutler looks off Hester and instead scrambles left. He rushes for five.
- Johnny Knox and Matt Forte are right next to each other up the left sideline. That must be some kind of mistake, and when Cutler tosses it deep towards Forte, it's essentially into triple coverage. Walter Thurmond reads the pass in flight (!!!), drops coverage on Knox, joins Earl Thomas in a double team and tips the pass away incomplete.
- Chris Clemons pressures on a loop inside and Lofa Tatupu tips away a pass targeting Chester Taylor.
Seahawks ball at the six.
- Michael Robinson pulls from trips to block inside and Lynch plunges forward for five. That isn't cause and effect. It's novel detail and result. Lynch wins the yardage through power.
- Messed up angle by Beef Moat here, as the play action is kind of comically botched. Hass reaches as if to hand off to Lynch but Lynch is a good foot from the outstretched ball. Anyone playing run ought to be ashamed. Hasselbeck finds Lynch free on the right and Lynch receives and just barely makes the first.
- Carlson seals Julius Peppers and Justin Forsett cuts back against his blockers and turns the corner around left end. He breaks up field for 11.
- Carlson blocks Idonije but Stacy Andrews misses Brain Urlacher and the next Forsett run nets four.
- Linebackers bite play action and stay gap true and that frees Robinson on the right, but he drops it.
- Mike Williams separates from Charles Tillman in the left flat and stretches for a wide throw and receives for eight and the first. Matt is throwing away from coverage, but this is a hard, truly harder than necessary, catch.
- Since we're talking BMFMW, and since people sometimes pick my brain about how good this or this talent is in isolation, or how good I think this or this talent is in isolation, I want to make clear that I think Williams could be a top five receiver. He isn't super fast, and he sometimes loses concentration in traffic, but he's huge, coordinated and his route running, especially at 6'5" 230, is absolutely a marvel to behold. Guys like Williams shatter profiles.
- More Lynch Effect: Pisa Tinoisamoa chases Lynch towards the right flat, Urlacher blitzes off right end and Chris Baker comes wide open over the middle. Matt finds him for an easy 16. Shades of 2007, there. The Man Called Aerodynamics caught like 20 passes over the middle just like so.
- The least exciting event in football: Slot Machine rhythm catch over the middle. Not that I don't love you, Brandon, but you're boring.
- Chris Spencer misses his block on Brian Urlacher and, you guessed, Frank Stallone tackles Robinson on a fullback quick hitter.
- Force drops Peppers. Other stuff happens. Justin Forsett upends and drops Julius Peppers in the open field. Other stuff happens. Matt's an inexplicable beat late passing towards Deon Butler in the left flat and a beat is more than enough for Zack Bowman to close and tackle Butler short of the first, in fact, for a loss.
- And it was a misdirection play that absolutely had to be bang-bang. Butler motions to left fullback prior to the snap and is uncovered ever so briefly, but Matt just doesn't pull the trigger. He waited and his opportunity was lost.
83 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What writes these captions?
Is that John or one of the other writers?
Doesn’t really matter. I love this site…
I like how you asked what, not who.
MORGAN, THAT’S WHAT!
by jacobstevens on Oct 20, 2010 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions
"What..." --> "Who..."
Doh. I need to proof read what I write before hitting the “POST” button.
JM
important seeming milestones, but his talent his performance, like an
Not to be nitpicky, but I thought you might want to add a comma.
Just throwing "not to be nitpicky" in a nitpicky comment doesnt make it not nitpicky
Which this definitely is. Seriously, why are there so many users here who want to be John’s editor? I guarantee he reads his stuff many times over even after its posted and will spot any mistakes on his own.
And, honestly, who fucking cares?
John fucking cares
You and I might not mind a minor typo here and there, but John’s mentioned several times that he appreciates people catching them (because he hates them).
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions
What about "not to be pedantic, but..."?
I use that one all the time. Verdict?
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
I find this to be both shallow and pedantic
Hmmm, yes, shallow and pedantic.
by J.L. White on Oct 20, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well played, sir.
Karma police, arrest this man.
by wyte_lightning on Oct 20, 2010 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Once had a girlfriend who loved to start sentences with, "I'm not trying to be a bitch, but..."
One time I just had to add, “But it comes so naturally you don’t have to try.”
You know how that worked out, but it was so worth it.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
Fantastic.
I just realized I’m really bad with that, but at least I understand where it’s important to be picky and where not to be.
(oops, pretty sure that’s grammatically wrong somehow).
I'd agree with you...
But Mike Sando routinely links to Field Gulls on his ESPN NFC West blog and I doubt John wants new readers to come across typos and mistakes that could easily be fixed.
Don't forget the d-bags at PFT
They link to Josh Morgan all the time.
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
That's what I figured
given your comments earlier in the post.
by The Ancient Mariner on Oct 20, 2010 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I hate our rollouts
It never works. I swear we run a rollout every week and the LB spying just sniffs it out and Hasselbeck ends up making an ugly throw.
Michael Robinson leads the Seahawks in completion percentage, yards-per-attempt, and QB rating.
And what would be the definition of "works"
Most NFL coaches work against a boolean success/fail model for playcalling. Considering the continued use of rollouts I would, possibly naively, assume that they have at least a moderate success rate as far as the play caller is concerned.
Or the threat of a rollout could cause opposing DCs to adjust their schemes
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Rollouts like ours would work much better if the QB had the arm to make better throws on the run.
Start Charlie Whitehurst. / #24 = Beast Mode! Welcome, Marshawn
Matt's weak arm appears to be the answer for every problem on the offense
How very convenient yet unfalsifiable.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Its a fact that making throws on the run requires more arm strength than a typical step-throw
by miracle_max on Oct 20, 2010 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions
And?
You claimed that the plays were failing because Matt’s arm isn’t strong enough. Where is the evidence of that anywhere?
Matt’s arm strength is a simplistic explanation for everything that ails this offense. It is also unfalsifiable, making it impossible to disprove.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry
I get too much like this sometimes:
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't think you should be sorry.
I am like everyone else here, more than tired of the discussion. And I am on the side that does feel empirical evidence has shown that it is about the biggest problem the offense has, and, remedied, most if not all things that we try to do on offense would be more effective because of it.
But you’re approaching both this topic and assertions in general, the right way, here, and that others beat the horse dead doesn’t man you ought to shy away.
by jacobstevens on Oct 21, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
I didn't claim anything
Nor do I blame Hasselbeck for every offense this problem faces. But there can only be so many reasons this particular play call doesn’t work, and since I highly doubt most teams are spying Hasselbeck, I’m inclined to believe its either Matt’s arm strength or Matt’s athleticism, or a combination of both.
by miracle_max on Oct 20, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions
err, *problem this offense faces"
:puts bong down:
by miracle_max on Oct 20, 2010 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, that's certainly reasonable
Maybe not correct, but probably reasonable. I just think the issue is more complicated than some people suggest. Apologies for getting shouty.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
I'm gonna continue to rec posts where people are man enough to apologize
Too rare on the interwebs, regardless of the topic or argument.
We all are passionate about our Hawks, and some conflict is natural.
by IslandHawk on Oct 21, 2010 6:34 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Are we struggling on rollouts because defenses don't respect the running game
or are the play action fakes generally having the desired effect and Hasselbeck is just not getting the job done with his feet on the rollouts?
I’d like to think that those rollouts will start to work if defensive coordinators make it a point of emphasis to contain Beast Force.
I find the lines separating the rushing game from the passing game to be blurier and blurier as time goes on
I think we may be coming to a point where a running back provides an independent form of offense in contrast to the quarterback, but looking at the rushing attack as another short-yard offense not unlike a screen pass or a slant pattern. Teams that don’t run the ball that well may not do so because they aren’t good at that aspect of the game, but rushing itself might be easily supplanted for some teams with short passing routes.
At the end of the day, we might see offenses broken down into 3 parts: The Quarterback, the blockers, and those who gain the yards (be it running back, wide receiver or tight end). Even if the NFL has become a pass-first league, it doesn’t necessarily mean that players like Adrian Peterson and Marshawn Lynch have less value.
What advantage (if any) does having all of those corner and safety blitzs on tape
do for the Seahawks from a strategic standpoint?
Obviously Whisenhunt will be stressing to Max Hall in their film sessions that the Seahawks love to blitz Milloy and they aren’t afraid to to send their corners. How do you game plan against a “blitz from everywhere” style Jim Johnson defense? Does the six sack effort against the Bears last week change the Cardinals game plan against us?
When does Schneider lock up BMW to a multi year contract?
Soon hopefully.
There will be plenty of time for that later.
There aren’t going to be teams banging down his door to pick him up given his history in with league. Mid-season contracts destroy the team mentality (see Brady/Moss for the most recent example).
Take care of the business part of football during the business part of the football year. Take care of Arizona now.
I pretty much agree.
But, it sure would be nice to get him locked up with a long-term, non-guaranteed deal. If he gets fat, cut him. If he doesn’t, great.
by It's Good To Be King on Oct 20, 2010 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Whoa, Michael Robinson in trips?
have we seen this before? And apparently we want to first establish the threat of a run from that formation before we throw a wicked Golden Tate screen with MR & BMW blocking?
"It's written like this:"
I walked towards the window, thinking jumbled thoughts of loves past, my feet felt pricks of nerves coming alive, which, in fact, they were not; but they were reminding me they were there, and I should feel them, feel pain, if only for a vanishing instance; and I looked out the window and saw the sun vanishing over the Vtlava River.
I know, right? Who uses all italics anymore? That’s so L’Operina!
Most of the texts I read these days are in comic sans
or sometimes wing dings.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 20, 2010 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I think the best way. . .
is to try and use as many fonts as possible. Mix in italics and bold, maybe some different colors.
I don't know too much about the nuts and bolts of playing football. I have a few questions about defensive players staying "gap correct". How big of a difference is there, for a defender*, between playing the run as opposed to attacking a pass play?
Specifically I’m thinking about your scouting piece -
Linebackers bite play action and stay gap true and that frees Robinson on the right…
I seem to recall a tidbit of information you wrote about Jared Allen, how his sacks in 2007(?) all came while playing with a lead? I may be horribly off – my memory…has gaps… – but I’m drawn to the apparent difference of success for a pass or run play depending on what the defense chooses to defend. How does a defender play the run? How does a defender play the pass? Is there a significant difference?
*the defenders I’m asking about would be those at the line of scrimmage, as I imagine that’s where “gaps assignments” matter.
Good Question
As someone who loves football, but never played, I second the question.
Portland transplant to Boston.
This is where the expression
“Football is a game of inches” comes in. Essentially, most defenders are in a state of flux before the snap. They might have a good guess of what is coming at them based on offensive personnel and formation, they may have a defensive call like a blitz that nullifies the distinction between pass and run, but they do not KNOW what is coming at them. At the snap, if you bite on a play fake as an LB and take two steps towards the ball carrier, you then have to bail back into your zone and the area between your zone and the safeties is gonna grow by a yard or two, making a reception easier. If you bite as a DL, you look to set the edge and shed to tackle the back, not get upfield and in a QB’s face. They are very different assignments and are contrary in nature.
While biting on the run does not preclude a defender from making a play down the line or ensure offensive success, it does make the defense a little looser, a little softer and a little further behind the offense.
by Fightfightfight on Oct 21, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
In a nutshell, when defending the run a defense tries to fill all the possible lanes a running back might want to run into...
….whereas when rushing the passer one big thing to do is overload one side of the ball, creating more pass rushers in that spot than blockers. Although in JM’s case here what he was saying (correct me if I’m wrong, guys) was that the guy who would have been covering Michael Robinson read run and stayed in to cover his gap assignment instead. Football being such a quick game, even if the opposing LB does this for a step or two, that can be enough for someone to get enough separation to get a pass completed to them.
Hope that started to explain it!
by Johnny Slick on Oct 20, 2010 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sure comma-free English is that new
I was always taught “Oxford English” which a) is not a big fan of commas and b) properly uses the em-dash, a sadly ignored little bit of English grammar.
Personally, it’s not commas I mind as much as weird, stilted structure, as in “Lawson, however, didn’t know what else she could do.” Why? Why would you do that to us?
Also I will personally murder the next sportwriter who writes “all he did was”
Also, uh, I kind of lost track what any of this had to do with anything.
Funny, I have no problem with that kind of structure.
Not sure if I’d want a whole book written that way, though.
I have to consciously reign in my comma use.
I’m not sure if this is the case for everyone else but it was drilled into my head at a young age that commas are important and you should use them all the goddamn time.
I think they are important.
Use them where warranted, always. If you don’t like them or are trying to avoid them, change your sentence structure. Mostly through the use of periods — keep sentences shorter. Use less “joins.”
by jacobstevens on Oct 21, 2010 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know I use commas excessively
Reading works of Hegel, Aristotle, Kierkegaard, Chomsky and Russell tend to destroy the ability to write short sentences.
by SmartAssCoug on Oct 21, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions
I fucking love dashes
I use dashes all the time—ALL THE GODDAMNED TIME, and I will get stabby with anyone who threatens to take my dashes away from me.
I am going to come into your house at night and rec up the place.
Kinda off-topic
Don Banks, in his power ranking:
I think what T.J. Houshmandzadeh and Deion Branch have taught us this year is this: If you’re a big-time free-agent receiver, stay out of Seattle. Don’t sign with the Seahawks. Their money might be greener, but the grass isn’t. (And besides, their lawns are wet a lot of the time, because, you know, it rains pretty frequently).
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/don_banks/10/20/week.7.1/index.html#ixzz12xBO65XY
Lovely. Great. Better than Great. Stupendous!
Big name (and small name) free agents are by and large a losing proposition in the NFL. Especially with the infamous Mr. Snyder in the owners box who has never heard of the Winner’s Curse.
Hungry and with a chip on their shoulder
I agree. I’m starting to think that the ideal free agent is one who is hungry and feeling disrespected by their former team. The ones with something to prove are going to work harder (most of the time, anyways) than the ones who come in feeling that they are the saviour to the new team.
Umm
does this guy not get that rain makes grass green?
by The Ancient Mariner on Oct 20, 2010 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
And um, how is Wes Welker considered a "comeback" player?
Is this not the guy who leads the league in receiving in the last four years?
Why is he even mentioning Housh? We certainly weren't holding him back.
And the lesson for Branch was simple, don’t leave a hall of fame QB in his prime.
I hated that lost opportunity with Butler
…Matt’s an inexplicable beat late passing towards Deon Butler in the left flat and a beat is more than enough for Zack Bowman to close and tackle Butler short of the first, in fact, for a loss.
And it was a misdirection play that absolutely had to be bang-bang. Butler motions to left fullback prior to the snap and is uncovered ever so briefly, but Matt just doesn’t pull the trigger. He waited and his opportunity was lost.
I was pissed because I thought it a clever little play to get a guy temporarily but clearly wide-the-hell-open. I hope to see that play run with Maple Bar.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
John, you say such nice things
Since we’re talking BMFMW, and since people sometimes pick my brain about how good this or this talent is in isolation, or how good I think this or this talent is in isolation, I want to make clear that I think Williams could be a top five receiver. He isn’t super fast, and he sometimes loses concentration in traffic, but he’s huge, coordinated and his route running, especially at 6’5" 230, is absolutely a marvel to behold. Guys like Williams shatter profiles.

by 


































