Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

Postgame: Atlanta Falcons 34 - Seahawks 18

Watching Charlie Whitehurst struggle puts Matt Hasselbeck into perspective. Whitehurst had 16 pass attempts. Hasselbeck 17. Each took a sack. Whitehurst was dropped after John Abraham bucked Russell Okung. Jamaal Anderson brought reality as Hassebeck was reliving glory days. Hasselbeck completed a higher percentage of passes. Whitehurst threw for more yards. Charlie's big two plays were scrambles. Matt's biggest failure was something like a roll out.

Neither quarterback played well. Yet Seattle's moribund offense looked quicker, sharper and more potent under Whitehurst. Why exactly? Could it be game state? The Seahawks were well out of it by the time Whitehurst took the field. Could it just be circumstance? Whitehurst nearly threw an interception, and had he, his line would not have looked a whole helluva lot better than Hasselbeck's.

I don't know.

Nothing happened today that confirms Whitehurst is the future or even that Hasselbeck is the past.

But that never, ever has been the point of contention. It has never been Matt versus Charlie, except maybe in the Qwest bleachers. It hasn't been Charlie versus anyone. It has always, always been Matt versus Matt. And the 35 year old is winning in blowout fashion.

Not every Seahawks fan knows this, no matter how often it's repeated, but Matt Hasselbeck was a great quarterback. Like Shaun Alexander was a great running back. Like the Boz was a great linebacker prospect. Like Marcus Tubbs was a promising young defensive tackle. Like Walter Jones was the greatest offensive lineman I have ever watched play.

To be great, he first had to be better. Before Hasselbeck was Hasselbeck, before Hasselbeck was struggling to start over Trent Dilfer, before Hasselbeck was surgically carving zones, before Hasselbeck was overcoming his body and his surrounding talent and conducting a playoff bound passing offense through Leonard Weaver and Bobby Engram and Maurice Morris and Marcus Pollard, he was just a kid that outplayed BC starter Scott Mutryn. He was better than Mutryn. He earned his way to the top.

Today, Whitehurst looked better than Hasselbeck. I can't quantify it. I will attempt to qualify it in the coming week, but it's not elusive. Whitehurst moves better than Hasselbeck. He has much more life in his throws and can fit passes into tighter windows. He doesn't read like Hasselbeck but he doesn't loiter in the pocket either. Charlie takes the ball and finds somewhere to zing it. It's not poetry. It's not 2005 or even 2004. But it's not 2007 either. It isn't an overmatched quarterback winning with his steadiness, skill, read and timing. Whitehurst is a big, athletic, strong-armed quarterback with potential. Greatness may be a very long ways away, but he was better today and the Seahawks were a better team with him under center.

. . .

The Seahawks defense is sooo hard to place. The run defense returned today and with it, the scheme suddenly didn't seem so cockeyed. Maybe Atlanta just didn't target certain weaknesses. Maybe it was Colin Cole, of all people.

When Seattle signed Cole, I was pretty unhappy. Cole was a big, barrel-chested situational run stuffer. He became an instant starter on the Seahawks line, and the results weren't pretty. It wasn't just Cole by any stretch, but a line that was already hurting for pass rush couldn't survive a situational run stuffer starting and a tackle playing end. Or at least it couldn't last year.

This year, it's clear the Seahawks do not expect pass rush from Cole. He isn't collapsing the pocket. He isn't shooting gaps. He is staying alive near the line and then using his immense upper body strength to separate and tackle. Cole had a pretty astounding eight total tackles today. Play after play you could find Cole in the thick of the action: stout in the scrum, suddenly free to wrap and padlock secure in his tackle.

No one lets me into meetings and so I can't confirm this, but it sure seems like Cole is a 3-4 nose tackle playing in an otherwise 4-3 front. Green Bay planned to re-sign Cole and start him at nose in their 3-4, but Seattle scooped him up. Now he plays over tackle in a 4-3, but the way he is so often free to tackle, the way he almost never can be found in the opposing backfield, the way he controls and reacts rather than gaps and attacks, it sure looks like he is playing two gaps. Every part of the Seahawks defense looks better with Cole in the mix.

This is a long-winded way of giving the guy the game ball.

Like a 3-4 team, the Seahawks need to compensate for starting a designated run stuffer on their defensive line. I have some theories, but I'll save those for another day. Seattle needs to compensate for Cole, but for the first time since his signing, I can say without reservation that this team is better with Colin Cole than without. Better, it's not everything but it beats worse.

Comment 322 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

even though it's been the case since week 2

I have to think this is finally the nail in the coffin for the diehard Matt supporters. How can sohmeone possibly play so bad and get to start next week. I would have loved to see Charlie start the game fresh instead of in mop up duty.

From The Hawks Nest - Seahawks Podcast
http://www.http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/from-the-hawks-nest/id385227705

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 19, 2010 5:20 PM PST reply actions  

Hugh Millen disagrees

Because Matt has “a decade of experience”. If experience is what matters, we should exhume and start George Blanda next week. It was odd on the Q13 post game they all kept chanting “best chance to win…”. I am beginning to think Hasselbeck has Jedi-like mind control powers over the weak willed.

Hopefully they’ll let Whitehurst get in a full week of practice with the first team offense for next week and then finish out the season.

by Malt Liquor on Dec 19, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

KJR is the worst

all the callers and hosts use the mantra “clearly Whitehurst is not the answer” and then quickly change topic. Yes clearly after a game and a half against the two best teams in the NFC and with an offense that lacks talent on the line Whitehurst is not the answer.

From The Hawks Nest - Seahawks Podcast
http://www.http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/from-the-hawks-nest/id385227705

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 19, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions  

KIRO isn't any better

Brock “glass jaw” Huard keeps on with the same tired “best chance to win” mantra and cites Matt’s long history.

I love how 3rd rate quarterbacks get to be analysts. I’d put up a picture of Sean Salisbury but I’m too fucking lazy.

by Malt Liquor on Dec 19, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions  

KIRO employs Dave Grosby and Mike Salk.

That makes them infinitely better than KJR.

by BrianL on Dec 19, 2010 6:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I listed to sports radio the other day for the first time in ages.

Sports radio is kind of like olives. I keep trying olives, but never with any success.

I had to turn it off when a guy came on to say that Matt wasn’t only needing a year or two resigned, but that he had 3-4 good years left in him if we put the team together to support him.

I just can’t stomach that, so I turned it off.

Just like olives, in about three or four more years, I’ll give it a try once again, and I probably wont like it.

But… there’s something to be said for not giving up on something, as long as you don’t repeat it daily expecting different results.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 7:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think we want to see that pic of Salisbury.

The original Brett Favre.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 6:58 PM PST up reply actions  

How DOES Millen speak

AND have his lips glued to Matt’s backside every week?

John Hancock

by mrcoffee1969 on Dec 20, 2010 7:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe if his "touches" included holding onto the ball

in the passing game, he would of gotten more opportunities.

by Surf Hawk on Dec 19, 2010 11:35 PM PST up reply actions  

So you focus your line on stopping the run

and force the opposition into “passing downs” and situations…

which the opposing team converts easily because of the Seahawks shit coverage.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 19, 2010 5:29 PM PST reply actions  

Ridiculous coverage.

5 yards of space for receivers most of the time. Watching Tru struggle out there was brutal, then he got hurt and watching Cox was even worse. We need to add two corners this offseason.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Dec 19, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

is there an inherent problem

in the coverage scheme?

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 19, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions  

No, the inherent problem is a pass rush that lets opposing quarterbacks have a nap, then pass at will.

Our corners will look surprisingly good (well, maybe not Jennings) when we get a rush from anyone other than Clemons.

by djafrot on Dec 19, 2010 7:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd say Jennings would benefit the most.

He has zero ball skills, and forced throws and inaccurate passes will amplify what he does well—cover. He leaves the window open because of the lack of hawking; the more pass rush, generally the tighter the window. Not always. But mostly.

Love the game, love the beer, love your team.

by THolt on Dec 19, 2010 8:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I think Earl Thomas is a CB playing S

Don’t know if the coaches will ever make that switch though, given we got nobody else to play FS at the moment.

by Kevaru on Dec 19, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Our CB position is weak

Tru isn’t the same, Jennings is a joke, T3 has potential, but our depth is paper-thin. I still can’t believe we didn’t make a deal with Pistol to keep him here. I rarely see press coverage out of any of the guys anyway.

by IslandHawk on Dec 19, 2010 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

If only they had

corners…

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 19, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but when your veteran QB

is a veteran of the war of 1812 it’s hard to have expectations.

by hazbro24 on Dec 19, 2010 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

If Pete starts Matt next week

I gotta say all this fresh air, young thinking bullshit was just that.

by broadbill birdwatcher on Dec 19, 2010 5:37 PM PST reply actions  

I would like to here a well thought out reasonable defense of Matt after today, last week and overall this season

I don’t care if Charlie is the answer or not, Matt is not the answer, but maybe Charlie won’t give away the game.

by stufr on Dec 19, 2010 5:41 PM PST reply actions  

Even if Charlie gives away the game

He will at least be a bit more exciting. Matt has just been slow death.

by IslandHawk on Dec 19, 2010 5:43 PM PST reply actions  

In the post-game presser, Carroll was asked "who's your starting QB next week?"

and Carroll replied “I don’t know”.

I’m paraphrasing a little, but the fact he didn’t stand firmly behind Matt as he’s done after every poor game (there has been a lot, haven’t there?), says a lot.

I think it’s FINALLY sinking in that not only is Matt playing poorly, HE’S the reason the Seahawks are losing games.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 6:19 PM PST reply actions  

RE: HE’S the reason the Seahawks are losing games.

That’s a huge stretch. The Seahawks are awful from top to bottom. Matt has struggled to the point that he needs to be replaced in the lineup. Beyond that, I wouldn’t start speculating about how many wins and losses have been on Matt’s shoulders. This is a flawed and broken football team regardless of who is under center.

There is no savior. Disco is dead.

by Culter on Dec 19, 2010 7:00 PM PST up reply actions  

He lost the game today

I’m not saying CW would have won it, but Matt lost it

by stufr on Dec 19, 2010 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say that Matt is the sole reason the Seahawks are losing games

But he is a large contributing factor in why they are losing so badly. The games would, if nothing else, be closer and possibly more competitive without his interceptions and fumbles.

by Buster! on Dec 19, 2010 7:52 PM PST up reply actions  

True

But he’s also thrown 28TDs and has close to a 2:1 TD to INT ratio.

by SmartAssCoug on Dec 20, 2010 9:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Also of note...

10 pro bowls, 5 first team All-Pro selections, 3 2nd team.

Oh, and one SB MVP, which of course comes with winning it.

Manning holds NFL records for consecutive seasons with over 4,000 yards passing and the most total seasons with 4,000 or more yards passing in a career. Manning holds the fifth highest career passer rating (94.9) in NFL history and the highest single-season passer rating (121.1 in 2004). He is the all-time Colts franchise leader in career wins, career passing yards, pass attempts, pass completions, and passing touchdowns.

Now you could say Matt is our all-time leader in similar numbers, but that’s over Dave Krieg and Jim Zorn, not Johnny Unitas.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 9:55 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Indeed; definitely not trying to equate the two of them.

Manning had a bad month but he’s still one of the greatest ever and seems to have gotten over his INT streak. Matt was a great QB (although not on Peyton’s level) but he’s been declining for quite some time now.

by thebyron on Dec 20, 2010 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I know you weren't...

just wanted to put it out there in case anyone else might fall prey to that line of thinking, only for real.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Defintely

I was more equating how the horrible month Matt has experienced cannot really be compared with the bad month Peyton has had. If one were to completely ignore both players’ historical stats, it would still be pretty clear that Matt’s recent struggles are a trend for the season, whereas Peyton’s appear to be an aberration on an otherwise typical Manning year.

by SmartAssCoug on Dec 20, 2010 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

He's the biggest reason why this team is terrible.

You could point out the o-line as a whole, sure, but Matt sure appears to have time to throw.

by djafrot on Dec 19, 2010 7:11 PM PST up reply actions  

This team is flawed

It starts with QB.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 19, 2010 7:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry, bro. When your QB throw 4 picks per game, he's the reason.

Period.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 8:10 PM PST up reply actions  

By being so unwavering, it makes it seem as though you don't understand the dynamism of pro football.

You very well may be right, but what of situational… shit? Play calling, i.e. Force not getting the sweep/toss plays that Lynch clearly isn’t cut out for. The defense making two mental errors (that I recall). His top two receivers coming back to real game action. Tru getting hurt while it was still a ball game. Etc. Etc.

Love the game, love the beer, love your team.

by THolt on Dec 19, 2010 10:15 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Considering the team we faced

and that we were tied at halftime, this was no less than the 2nd best performance of the season that was wasted. We weren’t out and out playing better, but the Falcons were playing somewhat uninspired, and caught the kind of breaks that made me think they can’t not win the Super Bowl this year.

In some ways we outplayed SF. The team did. 2 games in a row he is specifically losing the games.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 8:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed. We had a number of bad breaks go against us

The two fumbles really bounced their way, and the team was really in the game for the most part. I thought we also got screwed by the refs on a couple of the short yardage spots.

Matt really did pull a stinker. It happens. However, when the stinkers start to pile up, year after year, the few bright spots don’t outweigh the continually mediocre and sometimes outright terrible performances. I really want Matt to hang up his cleats here and not tarnish his legacy as one of the best players ever to wear a Seahawks uniform.

by IslandHawk on Dec 20, 2010 9:50 AM PST up reply actions  

I think that history will be kind to Hasselbeck

Watching him struggle the last few years, it’s been tough on everyone I think. However, whether you support him or Whitehurst as the starter right now, it’s kind of irrelevant to the discussion of Hass’ place in Seahawk history, and I think a few years from now the weight of his accomplishments will overshadow these last two seasons. As John said, Hasselbeck was once a great quarterback. I would amend that slightly to read “Hasselbeck was once a great quarterback, and should be remembered as such.”

Unfortunately, Matty has this maddening habit of throwing one or two good games a year (remember Jacksonville last year? I mean, I know they were bad and all, but Matt just carved them up), which makes this a discussion rather than an agreement that it’s time for him to slide into a backup role. I’m glad PC finally put in Whitehurst. It was maybe a game too late, but it was still the right thing to do, and I hope we see more of him in the next game.

Also, I mean, we can count our blessings. As bad as the chanting was (inexcusable in my mind, for what it’s worth, I mean, c’mon) it could be worse: we could be the Redskins. That was just brutal.

by Kingdomer on Dec 20, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

It's like how now I don't feel ashamed to wear an Alexander jersey, but I would not be caught dead wearing either of mine in 2007.

My Hasselbeck jersey is retired until Matt retires, because I don’t want to support him now. But I do realize he’s the best QB in franchise history and will recognize him as such—once he retires. He’s just pulling a Griffey by continuing to go out there and stink it up.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't blame Hasselbeck for continuing to play this season

The decision of who starts at QB is entirely on Carroll and the coaching staff.

But I definitely agree on the jersey thing. That sums up pretty well how I’m feeling right now.

by Kingdomer on Dec 20, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Even if he sticks around past his expiration date and has a terrible year next year, in time the legacy will be untarnished.

Just like Griffey.

10 years from now, I wont be thinking about Griffey’s last season and a half in Seattle, I’ll look back with warm memories on his time as “the Kid” in Seattle.

And I’ll look back with warm memories of Hasselbeck in 2003-2007 as well, when I felt like we had a chance in every game because our QB could make some things happen.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 9:58 AM PST up reply actions  

I hope you're right.

Part of me thinks some fans won’t ever forget though. People still mock me when I wear my SA jersey (It’s only been 4 seasons, so doesn’t diminish your point), which completely ticks me off.

We may forget it, but it still happened. That by itself sucks.

by MT Olson on Dec 20, 2010 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, well fuck them.

Anyone that wants to mock you for wearing the jersey of a likely HoF level candidate with numbers like that, then fuck them. Shaun had his faults, but he was a great running back, and league MVP.

You’d think we’re the fucking Yankees or something, with walls and walls of HoF plaques and a litany of league MVP’s. We have a very short list of nationally recognized great players, and Shaun was without a doubt for right or wrong, one of them. If a fan is too stupid to recognize that, then fuck them.

Seriously.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

How bout the late squib kick kickoff

that, within a space of about 18 inches total with a pylon in the middle, could have given the Seahawks starting drive position at the 20 or the 40 and just barely got behind the pylon to start us at the 20?

That 2nd Snelling fumble didn’t just get recovered by them. It didn’t just also give them a 1st down. It extended what at that moment was a stalled drive. Just amazing. They are winning the Super Bowl.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 10:13 AM PST up reply actions  

I think he understands Matt's lost us some games

I think the big question was whether Matt was going to be able to turn it around or not. The question is not “How is Matt playing?” but “How will Matt be able to play once things get clicking for him (and how long does that take)?”

While Matt had a couple of strong games recently, he’s had a couple of horrible games even more recently. Right now, I think change for change’s sake may be in order.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 19, 2010 7:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Sadly, I don't think he'll want the chance to turn it around now

I think the boos and the Charlie chant may have permanently broken his spirit. Never seen anyone look so demoralized.

This is far more uncomfortable to watch than Shaun’s end.

by MT Olson on Dec 19, 2010 7:14 PM PST up reply actions  

It was painful for me.

And I’m of course one of the chief proponents of letting Charlie play.

When the chant happened I was so god damn pissed that it’s come to this, that it was mismanaged this badly that the home crowd turned on Matt. And we have to call it what it was. It wasn’t a celebration of Charlie, it was a huge affront, a massive open faced slap to the face of the greatest QB the franchise has ever had.

Just a sad sad day.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I blame the coaching staff for letting this drag out so long.

certainly after last week, Charlie should have started against the Falcons. Not because he gave us the best chance to win now, but because Matt at QB gives the other team the best chance to win now.

John Hancock

by mrcoffee1969 on Dec 20, 2010 7:57 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Always sucks watching your great hope on the shoot down.

Griffey, for example.

Love the game, love the beer, love your team.

by THolt on Dec 19, 2010 10:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm not sure this is quite comparable to Griffey

I would argue that Matt can still play the game at a level higher than Griffey could have, relatively speaking of course.

by Kingdomer on Dec 20, 2010 9:59 AM PST up reply actions  

But then, he never had as high of a ceiling as Griffey either, so the difference is magnified.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah.

Somewhere between the troposphere and stratosphere.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Griffey's ceiling was so high

That Chuck Norris had to look up to see it.

by Kingdomer on Dec 20, 2010 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Josh Hamilton simply looked to the left.

Which was a mistake— he should have known better, given his experience. The pipe is always passed around the room clockwise.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'm not sure I buy that.

Matt Hasselbeck, last 4 games: 74/126, 58.7% completions, 4 TD, 10 INT, 867 yards, 216.74 yds/gm, 4 fumbles, 3 lost. That’s averaging 3.25 turnovers per game in this span.

You can say that it’s cherry picking four games, and you’d be right. However, it appears that for the last 3 years Hasselbeck gets worse as the season goes on, probably in part due to him being pretty old for an NFL player. Durability and being able to hold up in the face of the grind of an NFL season is important, and for years now Matt has shown he can’t do it.

He also turned the ball over 9 times in his first 8 games. Not terrible, but not great either. All told, Hasselbeck has had 3 games this year where he hasn’t turned the ball over. Six of his fourteen games have had him turn the ball over twice or more. I’m not sure how this is any better than Griffey batting .190 for the M’s this year. Sure, Griffey had a 1/4 with a 2B game or a 1/1 with a game winning single, but like Griffey, Hasselbeck’s good days do not outweigh his bad ones. Even if Whitehurst is just like Mike Sweeney, Sweeney even was an upgrade over Griffey, even though he too wasn’t very good. It’s hard to argue that Has

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

He should have retired after last year.

Llama's cut/release list:
Terrill, Trufant, Jennings, Locklear, Hasselbeck, Andrews, and so many more

by Wayward Llama on Dec 20, 2010 4:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Very few athletes retire a year too early instead of a year too late

Jim Brown, Barry Sanders, Elway, they seem to be the exceptions. Rarely is our last image of the player something to match his career legacy. It usually goes down this way, watching a once great player struggle.

by SmartAssCoug on Dec 20, 2010 9:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Edgar Martinez, Ted Williams...

There are guys that know when to go…they’re usually the ones without huge egos, except in Ted Williams’ case, where the ego of being the greatest made him retire before he embarrassed himself.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Hasselbeck's ego is a healthy size.

For the record.

This wooden soul of mine, it cannot ever climb from places it has fallen: In between where light can shine. It never falls in line, it barely has a spine, like branches severed from the vine. Like it was faulty by design.

by Cheddar28 on Dec 20, 2010 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Pete has to say "I don't know".

You don’t announce that that your starting quarterback is being benched before speaking to him privately. Unless of course you are Mike Shanahan and classless. Charlie will start next week, I’m sure.

by NinjaHawk on Dec 19, 2010 7:28 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Up to this point, Carroll has very firmly backed Matt Hasselbeck.

This is the first time there’s been any question/mystery.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 8:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Right.

And this week, he didn’t firmly back him because Matt is not going to play against Tampa. But he can’t say “Yes, I am going to bench Matt” before he actually benches him. To let Matt find out he’s being demoted during the post-game interview along with everyone else would have been classless.

by NinjaHawk on Dec 19, 2010 8:52 PM PST up reply actions  

He is most certainly not the only reason.

His strength is his head. That particular forte requires time to utilize. Not that I’m a fanboy. I’m just not convinced either way regarding Matt v. Clipboard Jesus. They both suck.

Love the game, love the beer, love your team.

by THolt on Dec 19, 2010 8:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

You don't know that Charlie sucks.

He’s played barely 5 quarters in his career.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 8:12 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

He's up to somewhere between 7-7.5 now, I think.

Definitely enough to make definitive conclusions, of course.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Huh? 4 in the Giants game, and 1.5 in this game.

Am I missing something? One series in another game when Hass was shaken up. Doesn’t count as a quarter.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 8:34 PM PST up reply actions  

He had 1.5 or so in the Arizona game too.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Charlie played for 2 series in the 2nd half of the Arizona game

Plus a kneel down at halftime.

IF IT IS TRUE THEN WE ARE SO SCREWED

by eohawkfan on Dec 20, 2010 1:31 AM PST up reply actions  

I thought he had more time than that... my bad then.

Shame on me, giving him an extra quarter or so with which to pass judgement.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Point taken.

From what I saw, they both suck. No one can possibly say the latter is still learning the offense, and the last three drives weren’t about timing issues. This is the conclusion I have personally drawn in watching CW. We have nothing else to go on and at this stage in Hawks’ evolution, some conclusions must be drawn. Here’s to him proving me wrong.

Love the game, love the beer, love your team.

by THolt on Dec 20, 2010 1:12 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

charlie sucks?

your really going to say that charlie sucks? how many qbs have been any good after so little playing time? Both mannings had rough starts but are either elite to good now, matt sat behind favre then got benched in favor of dilfer. breese sucked it up in sd, enough they picked up rivers. while charlie may not be our qb of the future, im sad to say matt is washed up, and its past time to give charlie a shot. whats the worst that can happen, we loose the last two games and have a good shot at drafting a qb?

by JHOIII on Dec 20, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Hey now...

we’ve had a full 5 quarters with which to judge. That’s enough time to show all, ask anyone.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Didn't "The Zombies" say?
It’s the Time of the Season
………… Seriously, is there a more symbolically perfect time for Clipboard Jesus to start than the day after Christmas?

At this point it seems like six of one and half a dozen of the other with regard to who starts.

It seems that there has to be some middle ground between Whitehurst who can throw a stronger & harder ball yet is inaccurate versus Hasselbeck whose soft tosses and lack of ability to elude defenders with his broken wing makes him a mere shadow of his 2005 form. Whitehurst has a better chance of improving his game than Hasselbeck does. Although by this point, if Whitehurst lacks the touch to throw an accurate short pass then he might never be able to improve that component of his game.

by Zarleyhawk on Dec 20, 2010 12:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Carroll came in knowing he couldn't replace Matt without losing the either the locker room, fan support or both.

I think Carroll has let Matt play his way out of the starting position. Carroll gave Matt every opportunity to show that he can be a difference maker instead he has shown his weaknesses. The fact Matt has been injured 3 years in a row wont help his case. More distressing to me than the inability to the physically play the position is the poor decision making that I think receivers have largely been getting the blame for.

by Trojan Knight on Dec 19, 2010 8:49 PM PST up reply actions  

No, the time is not right.

That’s Denny Green territory. You have to wait until Tell the Truth Monday at the soonest, and probably not until Tuesday when the players practice and get the outline of the gameplan. It was the right thing to do.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 8:21 AM PST up reply actions  

If Pete knows that a change is coming

he absolutely did the right thing by not saying anything during the post-game presser. Handle it behind closed doors, away from the press first.

by BrianL on Dec 20, 2010 8:35 AM PST up reply actions  

The Denny Green moment is actually more my favorite than

“who we thought they were/crown their ass.”

“Matt’s gonna start next week, that’s not an emotional decision, I had a lot of time to think about it on the sidelines while we were losing very badly.”

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 10:18 AM PST up reply actions  

If you liked that...

then this is the greatest win of all time.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:49 AM PST up reply actions  

There is a deep irony here...

…in that starting CW the next two games means the Seahawks will likely make the post season.

The defense and ST play well enough to win. Competent play at the QB position would have already given them that additional win they need to make the post-season. With CW, there is a fair chance they beat Tampa and/or the Rams and make it.

With that, there is some chance the Seahawks show well in the play-offs. Having a QB that can make the big play can make all the difference.

I fervently hope (the part of me that isn’t worried about draft position) that CW starts the next two games and puts Seattle into the play-offs.

by Hawksince77 on Dec 19, 2010 6:27 PM PST reply actions  

I am thoroughly, thoroughly fucking tired of this Matt/Charlie narrative

In particular because of how it has divided the fanbase and turned the last 8-9 game threads into who should be our QB pissing matches.

So I guess I’m mostly anxious for next season, when neither of the two will be under center.

by jhmg16 on Dec 19, 2010 6:48 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

There's no reason to think that Charlie isn't in the plans for next year

Either as a backup competing for snaps or as a (shudder) starter with a developmental guy sitting behind him.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 19, 2010 7:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Nor is there any reason to believe as of yet that Matt wont be under center.

As frustrating as it is that I have to type that.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 7:06 PM PST up reply actions  

He's not under contract and he's may close out the year on the bench

There’s a chance he’ll be back, but its a lot less likely than Charlie returning.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 19, 2010 7:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh I know.

Just saying that it’s clear as mudd.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Why shudder?

Go back and look at Matt’s first few games as a starter in 2001. He didn’t break a 55 passer rating until his 4th game.

by Malt Liquor on Dec 19, 2010 7:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Charlie has potential but is raw

There’s no way he should be the most polished QB on the roster.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 19, 2010 7:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I was sick of the Whitehurst/Hasselbeck debate months ago and I stopped talking about it

Really the debate is about as inane as 49er fans debating Troy Smith or Alex Smith.

by Kevaru on Dec 19, 2010 7:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Well it's not inane. Maybe distasteful.

Who starts at quarterback is pretty dang important for every team in the NFL.

by John Morgan on Dec 19, 2010 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I think we have a good shot at winning today if Charlie was starting.

The defense was playing fairly well and we were running the ball. All Charlie has to do is not lose… which has been Matt’s greatest problem.

by djafrot on Dec 19, 2010 7:13 PM PST up reply actions  

The defense couldn't stop the pass to save its life.

This wooden soul of mine, it cannot ever climb from places it has fallen: In between where light can shine. It never falls in line, it barely has a spine, like branches severed from the vine. Like it was faulty by design.

by Cheddar28 on Dec 20, 2010 2:33 PM PST up reply actions  

It's pretty high on the insignificant QB controversies

Maybe not as inane as the Gelbaugh/Stouffer debate. But it’s up there.

by Kevaru on Dec 19, 2010 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I wish I could understand how it is insignificant.

Because it seems damn significant to me, and most of us here. We’re talking about the God damn quarterback, for chrissakes!!!!!

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:33 PM PST up reply actions  

None of the above.

I wanted to put in Dan McGuire, because his brother was a better hitter than was either Gelbaugh or Stouffer, and I saw him light up someone in a college game the year before.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Mike Teel

had fans?

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 19, 2010 11:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah,

as crazy as it was, people would even call into some of the radio shows to argue that he should get a chance to start.

by Mind of no mind on Dec 19, 2010 11:33 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not particularly crazy.

Matt was awful for stretches last year, and we were out of the playoffs, so why not find out what we have? As it is he was an utterly wasted sixth round pick.

by djafrot on Dec 19, 2010 11:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep, no reason for him to sit.

Llama's cut/release list:
Terrill, Trufant, Jennings, Locklear, Hasselbeck, Andrews, and so many more

by Wayward Llama on Dec 20, 2010 4:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Yup.

Matt was bad and Seneca Wallace was Seneca Wallace.

by BrianL on Dec 20, 2010 7:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I was one

tbh his rocket arm was just fun. And 14 is a good QB number.

This wooden soul of mine, it cannot ever climb from places it has fallen: In between where light can shine. It never falls in line, it barely has a spine, like branches severed from the vine. Like it was faulty by design.

by Cheddar28 on Dec 20, 2010 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I was a Teel fan

He had a decent arm… Would have been nice to see what he could do with it.

I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me.

by wadswerth on Dec 20, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Love the game, love the beer, love your team.

by THolt on Dec 19, 2010 8:10 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Damn

Matt flynn looks really good. The NE defence isnt good and has a lot better WRs than Seattles other than Mike but I don’t like seeing 1 team have 2 fundamentally better QB’s than all of Seattle’s.

by dankfranks on Dec 19, 2010 7:30 PM PST reply actions  

Was at the game, way up in the rafters

So I was able to see quite a bit.

My observations (caveat: we were walking up the ramps to our seats during the initial TD drive so I didn’t get to see it):

- This defense can’t stop anybody. Ryan rarely got pressured, and he was able to pick us apart. If memory serves, ATL didn’t punt until the third quarter, and didn’t have a 3-and-out until the middle of the 4th.

- Kennard Cox had a horrific game. Torched repeatedly on D, big block in the back on special teams.

- We have no running game. Who gets the ball doesn’t matter much if at all; watching from above, there were no holes. Really, nothing at all.

- I did not see a wide receiver that was even a tiny bit open the entire game. Every pass was contested, and whoever it was that was covering WIlliams was awesome. That pick was one of the better ones I’ve ever seen.

- I think the sack/fumble for TD pretty much summed up the season. Call for a rollout, have a lineman let the defender in untouched. The Hasselbeck of a few years ago gets away, but today he just doesn’t have the mobility, not to mention the fact that he only has one good hand to fight back and it’s the one holding the ball. Missed assignment leaves your injured, aging QB all by himself in the end zone. Ballgame.

The difference between Whitehurst and Hasselbeck seems to be two fold:
- he has a stronger arm, which enabled him to get enough zip on passes to get it into tight coverage. I expect to see him throw a lot of INTs where he forces it into coverage, thinking he can get away with it.

- he’s more mobile/faster. The TD drive basically came down to him be able to run for his life a little better than Hass would have in the same situation down around the goal line.

Bottom line for me:
Hass should probably be shelved for the season, if for no other reason than he’s not healthy enough to get out of tough situations. That said, Whitehurst isn’t going to be a big upgrade. He’s basically a stronger-armed, less experienced Hasselbeck. Whether he is more talented, I have no idea.

None of this even matters imo. People who think bringing in Clipboard Jesus as your starter are delusional. He will make very little difference if your defense is giving up point on literally every drive and your receivers can’t get open and drop the ball on the rare occasion you get the ball to them.

by surfmonkey89 on Dec 19, 2010 7:32 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I agree with most of what you said

But the D actually showed me that they can be competitive against good offenses (even now) if the offense maintains drives. ATL went for it on 4th twice and the QB sneak for the first was complete BS. He gained nothing. Plus that fumble that bounced right to roddy white was 1: completely lucky and 2: if he hadn’t fumbled, I might be remembering it wrong, but I think it would have been short on 3rd down. They definetly need to get off the field on 3rd more but that can almost be made 50% better by just upgrading jennings’ CB position.

by dankfranks on Dec 19, 2010 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Obviously I had no angle on the 4th down play

I was five rows from the top, over by one of the corners. It looked like it could have gone either way, but you were sitting closer than I was so I’ll take your word for it :)

Ryan just put on a clinic. He threw a deep out in the 2nd quarter that was as pretty a pass as you’ll ever see, and the touchdown at the end of the half couldn’t have been placed any better. I would love to know how the WR got back both of our guys on that one though.

Fumble goes 15yds and bounces right to their guy, Hasselbeck gets facemasked in the end zone and no call, their punt kicks right and ends up inside the five, then their kickoff rolls just into the endzone instead of out at the 1. It just went on and on.

by surfmonkey89 on Dec 19, 2010 7:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Could it be?

That Whitehurst looked better than Hasselbeck because he was playing in 4th Quater mop up time when Atlanta was way ahead and not play as agressive on defense? That situation can make any back up look like Joe Montana. Let’s just be honest the Seahawks right now are just not a very good\consistent team. There is a lot of potential for the future. The only reason we are even in the playoff hunt is because we play in the worst division in football. But with St. Louis on the rise and the 49ers a QB away from being very competitive the Seahawks definitely have a lot of work to do, but I am confident that we will fill the holes that need to be filled. First and foremost for next season is QB, however for this season I stand firmly behind Hasselbeck.

The New York Islanders....they make opposing goalies look gooooood.

by Metalstar on Dec 19, 2010 7:45 PM PST reply actions  

Support vs irrelevance

There’s a difference between “supporting Hasselbeck” and having the opinion that who plays QB on this team is irrelevant because they’re too bad all over for it to matter.

I’ve been a supporter of Hass, but it’s probably time to go to Whitehurst if for no other reason than Hass is too injured to go on and you might as well give Whitehurst some reps.

Don’t be surprised if Whitehurst looks like crap and gets hurt himself though. There’s no running game, no receivers that can get open and little pass protection; Peyton Manning wouldn’t have done any better today.

by surfmonkey89 on Dec 19, 2010 7:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Pass protection has been decent this season.

Other than the hand, Matt is as healthy as he’s been in three or four years.

by BrianL on Dec 19, 2010 7:59 PM PST up reply actions  

This line has only been bad in pass protection twice

Against the Raiders and then against the Rams.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 19, 2010 8:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Other way around

Vs the rams, and then later against Oakland :)

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 8:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

Author of The Seahawks Asylum: http://seahawksblog.wordpress.com

by Nick Andron on Dec 19, 2010 8:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't care if Whitehurst looks like crap

I need to know now.

And while this has nothing to do with your argument, I am done with the idea that we need to keep Hass, then draft a QB so that QB can learn under Hass’ wing. No. I’m tired of this crap. Matt Ryan, Sam Bradford, Peyton Manning, to an extent Josh Freeman (because Leftweich sucked), and Mark Sanchez are all performing at an average-to-excellent level having been thrust to the starting spot in their first year.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 19, 2010 8:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Fine by me

Might as well find out what we’ve got.

Of course, if Whitehurst sucks no one gets to blame the WRs, lack of running game, etc.

Deal?

BTW, are you suggesting the Whitehurst is as good as any of the ones you’ve listed?

by surfmonkey89 on Dec 19, 2010 8:18 PM PST up reply actions  

You're complaining.

Youre complaining about Matt sucking because of the WR’s, lack of run game, etc… Seriously?

by PhoneHomeET29 on Dec 20, 2010 2:51 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

My comment is a little confusing.

Earlier in the thread he was complaining that Matt sucked ecause of the receivers and lack of run game. Now he’s saying if Charlie sucks he doesn’t want to hear that it’s because of the receivers and lack of run game. I was just pointing out what he was doing earlier in the thread with Matt with what he doesn’t wantto hear later with Charlie.

by PhoneHomeET29 on Dec 21, 2010 1:39 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I Agree

I mean it’s pro football, not a day care or a tickle fight. Get in there and figure out. A think a guy either has confidence or he doesn’t, his own successes of failures be damned.

Does Tim Tebow strike you as someone who is going to lose confidence because the road gets a little rocky?

This was the difference between Leaf and Manning I think.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 7:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh no...

how did we manage a Tebow comment in this thread?!?

That’s our answer! Trade for Tebow!!! A true messiah, not a clipboard Jesus, but the 2nd coming itself.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Also, for the record, QB's are the alpha male leaders of the football field.

You RARELY see a QB who loses confidence, even if they should. Did Matt lose confidence when instead of “taking the ball and going to score” he threw a pick6?

Did Ryan Leaf EVER lose confidence, even when all evidence should have pointed him to the fact that his extreme overconfidence was, instead of a blessing, a curse to his play (and life?)

Just because Tebow is a nice guy and won a ton of games in college, does not mean his confidence is a blessing, or a curse. David Greene won a ton of games in college. So did Troy Smith. So did Vince Young. All looked confident on the college field, and all have had moments looking not so good in the NFL world.

Confidence is, at the NFL level, assumed.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:08 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I disagree

I think a lot of QBs have had everything handed to them and lack the character and true confidence (which comes from ultimately having something more important in your life than football) to handle the heavy pressure and negative media attention when things go south in the NFL. Most played college at perrenial powers (8-4 is a bad year) and were gods at the high school level.

Their human. The idea that QBs never lose their confidence is hogwash.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Hmm.

How do you know QB’s have had everything handed to them? And how is Tebow different? He was handed a national championship caliber team with NFL WR’s Andre Caldwell, and Percy Harvin, fringe NFL linemen Phil Trautwein, NFL TE Cornelius Ingram and a schedule that routinely included such stalwarts and powerhouses as Florida International and The Citadel, and of course, the absolute mancrush of Thom Brennaman.

The idea that Tim Tebow has true character and true confidence is just as iffy as the idea that others do not. For one thing, we’ve never actually seen him against a stacked deck. He’s always been out in front, so you really have no idea whether he can handle heavy pressure and negative media when the hounds are unleashed. Thus far he’s been the opposite, the media darling.

Not that he hasn’t been good while in front. But to say his ability wasn’t handed to him is simply laughable. At 6’4" 245 and super fast, I’m sure he struggled to ever get an honest chance while growing up, and was never looked at by coaches. I’m sure his confidence came from a higher place, not from being the strongest fastest biggest kid in the playground who tasted success through winning at a young age.

“Something more important in your life than football.”
Sounds like you want a QB to be morally pure, and have something else “bigger” planned on Sundays. That’s fine. But it has absolutely no bearing on a person’s ability to play football.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Sounds like you want a QB to be morally pure, and have something else "bigger" planned on Sundays.

This is a wild assumption and is indicative of your entire post(s). If it’s any of your business, I’m an athiest. However, players that seem to have nothing but football in their lives are, imo, risks. Education, family, or I suppose religion. Personally, I believe that if football is the most important thing in your life, you are slightly disturbed. And I DO think it has bearing on a player’s long term ability to play football and confidence. Confidence comes from the knowledge that you don’t need this, be it a job, money, women, whatever.

For what it’s worth, I like the way Tebow’s handled the media. I think he’s handled it brilliantly his whole career, including the ADVERSITY he drummed up simply for stating his opinion.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I could care less what your religious preference is...

And the same goes for players. Unless they are raging pagan cannibals, I don’t care.

But you implicitly presume to know that Tebow’s life doesn’t revolve around football, but (apparently) other players does? It’s all entirely speculative, no less so than my comment after reading your words.

Unless you know a player personally, or are close to people who are close to a player, you know NOTHING about a player’s life away from the field, outside what the media has shown us.

Yet you presume because Tebow performed well in college at a top tier powerhouse that he has those “intangibles.”

If your job is the most important thing in your life, generally that means you may live a lonely life but you do your job well. Particularly when your job may last on average 3-5 years, in your early years? Why not go do that job with 100% focus, to the best of your ability for that short run, be it 1 year or 10.

C’mon. Many players dedicate themselves like that, before settling down later in life. In your 20’s and early 30’s you can be perfectly high functioning while focusing on your job as the number one thing in your life. Doesn’t make you disturbed, it simply improves your odds of being good at what you do. Doesn’t make it right or wrong, and I could care less whether they do that or get married, and/or finish their degree or go someplace other than a football field on Sundays.

Great example— Kelly Jennings has a degree in finance and is pursuing a second in business management. He’s incredibly well rounded. Every report I’ve ever heard on him speaks of him as a good person, a class act, yadda yadda etc. etc.

And a crappy football player.

I’d rather he spent more time working on his hands and cover skills and less on his business acumen.

And I don’t have a problem with how Tebow’s handled the media, but you have to be kidding me if you think there’s been much adversity in regard to him and the (mainstream) media. He’s been handled with kid gloves— they LOVE him. If you want to talk about handling adversity from the media, take a look at Mike Vick. He has handled the media far better in the past 2 years, under far tougher circumstances than Tim Tebow will ever face.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 1:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Tebow

That football is not His Highest his highest priority is not speculative at all. In Tebow’s own words:
“For me, every day includes four things: God, family, academics and football, in that order.”

To return slightly from the tangent, I think that one can look at Vince Young as an example of a QB who does need kid gloves and did lose confidence.

To return all the way to the original point: Yes, for crying out loud, start Charlie and let him sink or swim.

by thebyron on Dec 21, 2010 7:23 AM PST up reply actions  

So football already moved up to number 3 on the list.

And that’s an easy list, and not even original.

He’s stealing it from Vince Lombardi, via Jimmy V’s memorable ESPY speech.

So yeah, I’m just not buying the speculation. He seems genuine. But on Azimeir’s point on being disturbed by putting football number one, I give you Michael Jordan. Competitiveness was number 1, basketball number 2 and family a distant 3. I would have no problem with the Michael Jordan of football, whoever he is, being on the Seahawks and leading us forward.

And in fact, I think you have to be a little disturbed to play football at all. I mean, you are going out there and doing a job in which you could be killed, are certainly going to be maimed, and have no guarantee of a job next week. That’s disturbing.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 8:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I never said trade for Tebow

But there’s no question you’ll get that kid’s best every down.

My overall point is that handling QBs with kid gloves – “you don’t want him to lose confidence” – is a waste of time. Adversity is part of the job. Grab a helmet.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't know
But there’s no question you’ll get that kid’s best every down.

I think we tend to equate success with effort too often.

by MT Olson on Dec 20, 2010 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

I never said success either

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 11:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't really wanna go down this rabbithole

But one really shouldn’t be so unquestioning of a player’s effort.

by MT Olson on Dec 20, 2010 11:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Nor should you question other's effort.

Matt Hasselbeck is as intense a competitor as you will see. So was Zorn. And Krieg? Hell, his college was so NOT a football factor that it doesn’t even exist anymore. I ask you to tell me a time when ANY of them didn’t give their best on every down.

UGH. Azimeir, your argument is so wrong on so many levels.

And now you are talking about adversity being part of the job? Then Florida should have taken the kid gloves off as well. You do realize they haven’t played a non-league regular season game out of the state of Florida since George Bush SENIOR was president, right? You do realize they pad their stats against crap schools that give up home games for a paycheck from Florida, right? You do realize that Tebow never had to deal with the kind of adversity that pretty much every player from every school NOT named USC, Texas, LSU, Alabama or Florida had to deal with? Things like, oh, I don’t know, a lack of surrounding talent. Florida has so many 4 and 5 star recruits, they can map the constellations of the entire night sky.

And there is nothing wrong with that. But don’t say that they won because of Tebow’s heart, grit and determination.

Hell, the greatest game I’ve ever seen a single player have on the college field was Vince Young vs. USC in the National Championship game of … I think it was 06. And in that game, a guy who has been condemned on the pro stage for lacking determination took his team on his shoulders and carried them.

Most NFL QB’s, and make no mistake, most professional QB’s are professional, give their best all the time. Derek Anderson gives his all. Doesn’t make him better because of it. And frankly, I wouldn’t be suprised if the longer after they take the “kid gloves” off, the more he looks like Derek Anderson statistically.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 12:32 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

For the top paragraph:

We don’t know. We just don’t know. Although I am inclined to agree with you about those players. But it’s too unquantifiable and therefore not really worth fighting over. I just hate absolute statements.

by MT Olson on Dec 20, 2010 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed wholeheartedly.

As you know, I was questioning the original poster’s absolutes…

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm sorry.

I didn’t mean to put words in your mouth. But Tim Tebow as an NFL QB is terribly controversial. He’s done nothing to deserve the praise that’s been heaped on him, and with that excessive praise, yes, there is the blow back of mockery. I hope I haven’t mocked HIM as a person— but have focused on others unreasonable expectation and affection, and of course, his lack of NFL QB ability at this point.

He was a HELL of a college QB, on the strength of his legs and an amazing supporting cast. I’m just not buying the man-love so many people have for him.

He’s a QB who was drafted in the first round (and was part of the reason the coach that reached for him was already fired) despite having a glaring weakness for an NFL QB prospect— not having throwing mechanics.

Imagine a 1st round pick WR who can’t catch, or a MLB who can’t tackle…

He was a great player, but got too much credit for the efforts of his teammates. Click on that link I put up above. It highlights Brenneman’s unprofessional man crush, but it does more than that, it (in a humorous way) points out the errors in the “Tebow carries Florida” argument in summary of the national championship game.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 1:20 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't disagree with much of this

Although I’m not sure that Tebow is a QB who can’t throw. Will he ever be a successful NFL QB? I have no idea. I’m not advocating taking character in lieu of talent, merely weighing it as one factor. For instance, part of Luck’s attractiveness over Newton’s at this point has to be the Stanford education versus the myriad of off-field question marks. Sometimes those questions marks are completely unfounded (Warren Sapp), sometimes they’re worth the headache (Randy Moss), sometimes they crash and burn (Lawrence Phillips).

I think it’s pretty safe to say that Newton needs football more than Luck does. I am basing this on the fact that Luck will be graduating with a degree from Stanford while Newton has attended three colleges in pursuit of the best football opportunity and should he be a part of the draft this spring would still not have a degree. For speculation’s sake, however, if when the ‘Hawks draft and Newton’s sitting there unpicked in the mid teens (he won’t be) would I be pissing myself for Seattle to take him? You’re Goddamn right I would.

As Tebow goes, I simply think that if you took football away (playing, that is, once and for all) he’d move on to his next thing in life. In a different way, it’s like when Steve Young could play (and ultimately walk away from the game early for health reasons) with the knowledge, “fuck it, I can always go practice law if I want.”

I completely understand and agree with you that Tebow gets a lot of man-love. I don’t care about that. He also gets a lot of blowback and undeserved hate (as you pointed out), people discrediting what he did accomplish while at Florida. I don’t really care about that either. I try to use my own eyes and ears, and I like the kid. I hope he does well. There are worse things that could happen than for a kid to say, “when I grow up, I wanna be like Tim Tebow” assuming he doesn’t get caught with an eightball and a hooker at some point. =)

Oh, and NO college player deserves the praise heaped on them coming out in the first round.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 21, 2010 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Well said.

And this I “get” much more than where I misperceived you were going earlier.

Nice Lawrence Phillips reference by the way. Have you ever seen the draft video from when he was selected. Kiper and Theismann go back and forth on him, and it’s pretty damn interesting.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

You've put so many words in my mouth...

I can’t begin to defend them.

All my original point was in support of playing Charlie Whitehurst whether he’s ready or not.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 10:46 PM PST up reply actions  

On that, you and I can agree.

Play Charlie and let him succeed or fail.

On Tebow, we’re miles and miles apart.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 1:09 AM PST up reply actions  

But I never took a position on Tebow

Other than that he’s a high character guy essentially. I don’t know him or Vince Young, but based on the information at hand, I don’t think Tebow would ever inflict the overall drama that Young has on the Titans. Speculative? Sure. But I don’t think it’s wildly speculative.

I never said Tebow was nor would be great.

I never said trade for Tebow.

I never said others were not high character guys, except Leaf (and now Young), and if that’s news I need to reevaluate my entire football pantheon and belief GPS.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 21, 2010 8:46 AM PST up reply actions  

It'd be cheaper

to just draft Locker no?

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm a bigger fan of

Locker as far as actual QBing skills.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

But imagine Whitehurst and Tebow on the same team!!!

Jesus and Jesus’ favorite player, on the same sideline, in QB meetings. None could stand before our might!

by SmartAssCoug on Dec 20, 2010 11:58 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'd rather have Matt and Jake on the same team.

Seattle sports fan heaven.

This wooden soul of mine, it cannot ever climb from places it has fallen: In between where light can shine. It never falls in line, it barely has a spine, like branches severed from the vine. Like it was faulty by design.

by Cheddar28 on Dec 20, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, maybe.

I definitely have a limit on what I would trade for him.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed. But now that McDaniels is gone

we couldn’t get some fantastic deal for him.

I mean, think of how great it would be if we could get Tebow for two glazed Krispy Kreme’s and Sean Locklear?

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd rather have the donuts.

They have smaller holes than Tebow’s game.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 1:53 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

The old Peyton Manning line.

I call B.S. Pass protection has been good all season. The run game started good, but Matt couldn’t keep it going,because he does need to complete passes in order to get 1st downs. I want a new QB period, not because Matt is too “injured” or just to give Charlie some reps, but because Matt is injury prone, old, and not accurate. Also because Charlie is inexperienced, not very good, and has a wild arm. Pass protection gas looked above average, everyone had plenty of time.

by PhoneHomeET29 on Dec 20, 2010 2:48 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Bad.

That’s been it. 2 out of 14 games. LARGE SAMPLE!

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 20, 2010 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

How good has the line play been the other games?

Above average, especially for a savvy vet that protects the ball and is skilled in reading defenses. Have you not been impressed the majority of time in pass protection or do those two games define the OL for the season?

by PhoneHomeET29 on Dec 21, 2010 1:43 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

There have been really good periods and really bad periods

To say that the OL has played well all year completely ignores some of the ugliest games in recent memory.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 21, 2010 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

We mentioned John Carlson and catch in the same sentence this week

Bout time.

Dear Paul Allen, cap-less year, massive front loaded contracts? Not one owner can outbid you....

by S_o_Smith on Dec 19, 2010 8:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm worried about Carlson's tenure in Seattle

Especially if Morrah continues to develop.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 19, 2010 8:55 PM PST up reply actions  

2 TE's that can stretch the seem with hands

I seem to remember hearing something about someone liking 2 TE sets. How much has Matt targeted Carlson this year when hes actually running a route, not blocking? Whitehurst threw to him almost immediately. Wonder if that means something.

Dear Paul Allen, cap-less year, massive front loaded contracts? Not one owner can outbid you....

by S_o_Smith on Dec 19, 2010 9:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Heck, they have three...

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 9:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope so

If Carlson doesn’t feel wanted he can always go back to Indiana and play for the Colts, where he’ll immediately have a 125 catch season.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 19, 2010 9:15 PM PST up reply actions  

If he develops, he develops.

If Morrah is better receiver and McCoy is in to block, then trade Carlson.

Llama's cut/release list:
Terrill, Trufant, Jennings, Locklear, Hasselbeck, Andrews, and so many more

by Wayward Llama on Dec 20, 2010 4:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Carlson still has it.

Charlie and Carlson’s pass and catch was great. It shows that if he’s actually thrown to with a decent pass he will catch it, which is what we’ve always known. Matt hasn’t been targetting him and web he does it’s a desperate throw.

by PhoneHomeET29 on Dec 20, 2010 3:00 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

To be fair, though, some of it has been on John as well

I have seen Carlson drop some catchable balls (e.g. in the back of the endzone in previous games this season). However, he is getting so few looks, it is a bit natural to press. The combination of his few targets and occasional drops has not been positive.

I think if Carlson was on a team with a good QB, he would be quite good, but he may be the type of guy that needs some reps to reach his stride.

by IslandHawk on Dec 20, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah. Carlson was much more open and a completion to him would have netted a 1st

compared to that instant check down to Stokley 3 yards before the marker. Matt goes to his guys first, more than many QBs.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

If anything

They were blanketing them even tighter after the Hasselflop. I saw what looked like fairly blatant DPI’s on Whitehurst’s first three passing plays. The Seattle WRs were wearing extra jerseys.

"Retarded isn't a race." -Thingray

by Matt Erickson on Dec 20, 2010 12:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I did notice that.

It was pretty obvious. Of course, the refs weren’t noticing much at all.

by djafrot on Dec 20, 2010 1:44 AM PST up reply actions  

FWIW, this is the happiest I've been all season after a loss.

For a couple of reasons.

1) We were in the game right up to the point where Hasselbeck gakked it away. Aside from the Panthers game, that was the latest into a contest this year where we were behind but I still felt we had a chance.

2) Whitehurst may not be a significant improvement over Hasselbeck in terms of talent, but judging by the reactions of everyone in the game thread – to say nothing of the crowd (wouldn’t know firsthand, didn’t get the game in my area) – having Whitehurst on the field is energizing the fans. He may not be the ultimate solution at QB, but novelty alone may help us get into the playoffs if it keeps the team fired up (and indeed, playoffs this year in lieu of draft picks is still what we’re shooting for).

3) At this point last year, the ‘Hawks were so demoralized by Li’l Mora that they were spotting opponents two first quarter TDs every week. They may indeed be less talented than they were the last two years, but at least this team plays like it gives a damn, and that’s probably why this year’s record is better than last year’s.

FG's second favorite football-illiterate semi-troll.

by Hmph on Dec 19, 2010 7:54 PM PST reply actions  

Signing Cole felt like something from playing Madden's Franchise Mode

You think you can generate pass rush by playing the DE/scheming correctly, you just need a big dude to hold ground in the middle. You say, “Colin Cole gives me a 93 in rush defense. Even though he only gives me a 78 in pass defense I can make it up by playing as the DE.” I think the coaching staff has a similar mindset (“Cole gives us a solid run-stopping ability but not much pass rush. We can compensate by starting a situational pass rusher as an every-down pass rusher.”).

by Jackrabbit5683 on Dec 19, 2010 7:58 PM PST reply actions  

trick in madden.

i sort of use pete’s “bandit” package. in dollar defense i put clemons at LE, curry at RE (he’s a beast 85 finesse move, 85 block shedd, 75 power move), put babineaux at SS, and Milloy as the other LB paired with tatupu (gives you the awareness). works well when you know the opponent is throwing.

by jyellow865 on Dec 19, 2010 8:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know what I was hoping for as far as Matt's exit was concerned....

But this wasn’t it. I have too much love for him to be excited that he is done, even if I think it is the right move.

by Big E-Z on Dec 19, 2010 7:58 PM PST reply actions  

Unfortunately

This was….not one of Okung’s better games.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 19, 2010 8:14 PM PST reply actions  

The quote:
“Charlie did an OK job. He went in there and he handled himself all right, made a couple of mistakes with cadence and things, got some penalties for us that look like an O-lineman, but was the quarterback. So we didn’t function as sharp as we would like. But he did move the club a little bit, and he made a couple plays with his legs and made a couple really nice throws. Enough to do a good job.”

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seahawksblog/2013719894_petecarrollsaysnodecisiononnextweeksstarter.html

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 19, 2010 8:31 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Thanks

Was that why our center had a false start too?

by Surf Hawk on Dec 19, 2010 11:45 PM PST up reply actions  

This coach, I like him.

Charlie also must have the highest career bobbled snap percentage in history. A game and a half, and what, 8 bobbled snaps?

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 8:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Two were right to the hands.

I didn’t even notice the bobble until the replay, and that’s what stood out. How subtly he doesn’t have instant control of the ball like every other QB in the world. Problem showed against New York, too.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Rookie vs. one of the best pass rushers in the game

Those things will happen. I just hope the experience helps him.

by Kevaru on Dec 19, 2010 8:30 PM PST up reply actions  

It will

what does it say they we’re disappointed that a rookie was beat by one of the best pass rushers in the league?

Love this kid.

by John Morgan on Dec 19, 2010 8:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha, totally.

I was at the point where I was like “WTF OKIE” then realized that he was a rookie and chided myself a little.

He’s gold.

by djafrot on Dec 19, 2010 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

And Abraham is really a beast, truly one of the best in the game.

Tied for 22nd all time (granted sacks weren’t tracked until 1982).

One more very good year next year and he could probably get as high as 15th.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 19, 2010 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Lucky Falcons

They get Kerney then Abraham.

This wooden soul of mine, it cannot ever climb from places it has fallen: In between where light can shine. It never falls in line, it barely has a spine, like branches severed from the vine. Like it was faulty by design.

by Cheddar28 on Dec 20, 2010 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Hell, we probably will too.

Sigh.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually, great point.

But I was thinking more about Major League.

“Hell of a player, wish we had him two years ago.”
-We did.
“Four years ago, then.”

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

We knew this in the preseason:

Today, Whitehurst looked better than Hasselbeck. I can’t quantify it. I will attempt to qualify it in the coming week, but it’s not elusive. Whitehurst moves better than Hasselbeck. He has much more life in his throws and can fit passes into tighter windows

The ‘shame’ is why it’s taken so long to move to potentially better from …from….declined beyond reclamation.

...

by Misfit74 on Dec 19, 2010 8:34 PM PST reply actions  

Dion Branch

 He stole Matts Mojo on the way outta town!.

by Richard fg7 on Dec 19, 2010 10:04 PM PST reply actions  

My week is ruined...

unless I hear Charlie gets to practice with the 1st team.

This team is maddening.

by grinch11 on Dec 19, 2010 10:14 PM PST reply actions  

A cool thing was that Charlie got his first TD

Not to enter the QB debate, but that was pretty cool, to see a guy as a backup for so long get a TD. You just feel happy for a guy who finally gets to come off the bench and show what he’s got. And to enter the QB debate, I hope he can show more in Tampa.

by Surf Hawk on Dec 19, 2010 11:48 PM PST reply actions  

I was happy for Charlie

To see him smile and possibly gain SOME confidence for once, is nice, and I felt happy for him.

by Pessimistic Optimist on Dec 19, 2010 11:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm hoping he get's some more first career TDs next suday too.

He needs to start racking them up faster so people don’t forget he’s not a virgin.

by hazbro24 on Dec 20, 2010 10:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Starting QB

Strangely, I feel that the solution is simple. Starting Whitehurst is win-win; starting Hasselbeck only serves the past, much like many greats stay too long.

I don’t know that I can envision a future with Hasselbeck a Seahawk next year. Perhaps backup/mentor to a rookie QB while he gets OJT, but I think a more likely/attractive scenario is Whitehurst as the backup to whoever the Hawks acquire as the ‘answer’, unless Charlie does something to show that he is that answer. The only fear I had was that ‘hurst was going to embarrass himself (to the tune of Ryan Leaf rookie season 2-15-25-0-4) but I think it’s clear now that Charlie’s not appreciably worse (or better, so far) than Hasselbeck. Let’s see what happens when he gets all the snaps with the first team.

What is the worst that could happen at this point? Finish 7-9, win the West, and get humiliated on national TV. If Whitehurst stinks we most likely lose out. So? Maybe he helps the Hawks win out and play a respectable playoff game and it’s the start of something (at least rasies his value). Even if Hasselbeck helped Seattle do these same things it serves no purpose; he has no value going forward, only in the past, in the hearts in minds of Seahawks fans.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 20, 2010 6:35 AM PST reply actions  

I didn't want it to come to this.

The “Charlie” chants broke my heart. I’ve been ready for the switch since September. Was hoping it would have come with more graciousness than that. Not faulting anyone, just how it came to be, and it was a pretty emotional thing for me to witness.

by jacobstevens on Dec 20, 2010 8:26 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

I was thinking the same thing.

When the Charlie chants kept recurring after the benching I had to leave. It’s not that I thought it was uncalled for or unfitting given just how poorly Matt has played but I didn’t want it to come to that. It reminded me of when the fans turned on SA. In a way it’s classless, but I can’t really think of another way that a group with so much invested and absolutely no control can get a message across that change is mandatory.

I actually think Matt earned his boo’s where SA became a victim of circumstance (age, stubborn coach, poor O-line, injury, etc). When SA got boo’d we had a clearly better option outperforming him and it wasn’t his fault that his number kept being called. Matt has essentially lost a fan base that by and large wants change only for the sake of change and not because they feel CW is the answer.

If I'm going to root for an all-tools QB starting for my Seahawks it better be Jake Locker.

by The Manchild on Dec 20, 2010 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree that I didn't want it to come to that...

However, we only have Hass and Carroll to blame for it. Matt for continuing to decline and then trying to be a playmaker when he gets frustrated…and Carroll for sticking with a crap QB. I did boo and chant for Charlie, because I feel as fans, as much as it’s a bit toxic, it is our job as fans to let the front office and coaching staff know that we won’t settle for the status quo and mediocrity when we have been watching little to no progress for three years straight now.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 11:24 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

They'll watch the film, and they should name Charlie the starter.

One pass play—the touch fade route on the 2 pt. conversion should get him the job. Matt hasn’t been able to make that throw for two seasons, and is a big reason our red zone offense has been terra-bad.

And it wasn’t garbage time, that’s just another excuse for Matt. Charlie got the game back to within two scores, the falcons were bringing pressure, blanketing the receivers, and left all their starters in.

What we saw from Matt was a QB who can’t escape pressure and will fumble or self sack instead of throwing it away , will force balls and throw picks instead of throwing it away, and is capable of complete meltdown at any given moment. For QB’s to be good in late stages in their careers they need to manage games and not force things. Matt hasn’t shown that ability.

Charlie has shown the ability to make the throws, and has shown mobility. He has the physical tools that Matt no longer has. Where Matt was supposed to be better was in the decision making and experience, but what Matt has shown is that he’s lost that too. The only logical decision now is to play the QB with the physical ability to get away with making bad decisions, because the veteran “best chance to win” QB is making horrible decisions and can no longer out run 350 pound linemen when he does something stupid.

by hazbro24 on Dec 20, 2010 10:01 AM PST reply actions  

On throwing it away, I noticed Charlie was able to throw it away instead of taking the sack on one play.

It was a small difference, but it seemed significant, even to the point of someone behind me yelling “TAKE NOTES, HASSELBECK!”

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Steve Kelley says the Seahawks should make a change at QB

That’s when you know the call is Universal when you can get that douche to go against his Holmgren/Hass agenda.

Accustomed to mediocrity.

by SSreporters on Dec 20, 2010 10:24 AM PST reply actions  

He's just setting the foundation for his new Locker agenda

Expect once this season is over about 2-3 articles from him a week calling Locker the “only” choice for the Hawks.

by SmartAssCoug on Dec 20, 2010 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Do you think he listens to William Shatner's "Rocket Man" on repeat when he writes?

If you were to listen to that while reading Steve Kelley, would it be the same as watching the Wizard of Oz and listening to Dark Side of the Moon?

by SmartAssCoug on Dec 20, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Amazing.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Well put.

If Hass is old and washed-up what am I? Sob….

If I'm going to root for an all-tools QB starting for my Seahawks it better be Jake Locker.

by The Manchild on Dec 20, 2010 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

At what point do our WR's

get criticized? I don’t see another group of starting (or entire group) of receivers in the NFL. Mike WIliams has the chance to be one of the top 20 WRs in the league, but the rest is simply garbage.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 1:13 PM PST reply actions  

Do you think

Ben Obomanu is garbage? Do you think Brandon Stokely is garbage?

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Obo

but I highly doubt he is more than a special teams player on the majority of teams (and frankly, that is what he was with us until we traded Housh and Branch).

Stokely – dime a dozen, that if we dropped zero teams would pick up. He had a great career at Denver and is servicable now.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Stokely is able to run routes and get separation

Apparently some of the other guys are having trouble in those areas.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 20, 2010 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say Stokely is garbage

He has a limited role which he fills very well. He’s a slot receiver. As long as all that’s being asked of him is that he be able to get open on short to medium ins and outs, he can be productive. And really, he has been while he’s been here.

by Kingdomer on Dec 20, 2010 1:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Ok garbage is a little too critical

my assessment is that, as a whole, our WR are one of the worst in the NFL. Probably the worst. I’m not a football stats type of guy, so I’d be interested if there is something that supports this assumption. When Stockely leads the team in receptions 3 days after being pulled off his couch, that has to say something about the quality of the group.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I can see your point, then

I do, however, think they’ll be better as a group next year.

by Kingdomer on Dec 20, 2010 2:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think our WR corps is that bad.

I think the people throwing to them are bad. A wide receivers success is based firstly on: who’s throwing to him, then how good he is, then the scheme he plays in.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 2:27 PM PST up reply actions  

You think Hasselbeck tears

shit up at Arizona? I sure do. Minnesota? Hell yes.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Also Minnesota is designed for a deep passing attack with Harvin, Rice, Berrian, Shiancoe, and Peterson to dump off to.

So yeah, swing and a miss on both. Both teams are geared for strong-armed QBs which Hasselbeck is not.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

True

but the fact that they were interested in him means that they probably didn’t think he’d be a bad fit.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 20, 2010 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Pete Carroll doesn't think Matt is a bad fit and I think Carroll's a good coach.

Coaches and players always seem to believe a player can be the player they were 5 years ago just based on their name and reputation. They’re the last to realize old names are bad now.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Or Pete has limited resources

and is trying to right the ship starting with the parts that looked the most broken at the start of the season.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 20, 2010 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think so

Hass would be in worse shape in both AZ and Minn. Both of those teams are fairly crap at protecting the QB. You think the Seahawks have trouble with QB pressure? Look at how many QB’s those teams have gone through.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Once again.

Do you really think Williams-Tate-Butler-Stokley-Carlson-Morrah-Lynch-Forsett-Obomanu is any worse than Wayne-Garcon-Collie-Clark-Tamme-Addai-Simpson-White? I really don’t. While Wayne and Clark are elite, I’d say overall the Seahawks group is better. And yet, the Colts passing game keeps working, and it’s running game is still respectable. Weird.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's kinda weird

how the catalyst for the offense that is working is quite possibly one of the greatest QB’s of all time and the catalyst for the offense that isn’t working is… Matt Hasselbeck.

by chrees on Dec 20, 2010 3:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Way to miss the point.

The point is, a good or great quarterback can take a shitty surrounding cast and make them look awesome. Matt has better surrounding talent, and they look awful. Matt is making his supporting cast worse, Peyton is making his better. If you get a QB that’s better than Matt (even though you won’t get one as good as Peyton), I guarantee you the supporting cast looks better.

Give Peyton this supporting cast and with the speed of Butler and Tate, and size of Williams, they’d become stars. Give David Garrard those guys and they’d at least look above average.

by BrettJMiller on Dec 20, 2010 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

The point I'm making is

That Peyton Manning is neither good, nor great – He’s going to go down as one of THE GREATEST of all time, if not THE GREATEST. You can’t make a barometer of that.

It’s like saying that Jordan was able to win the title without a dominant big man – why can’t anyone else seem to? Because it’s not a fair comparison – Jordan is the greatest of all time.

by chrees on Dec 22, 2010 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Obo's a starting
  1. on most teams

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 2:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Really?

I love the guy and excited to see him produce, but he has only started 2 games for us. Where would he be a starter?

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

sorry that came out wrong

he’s a starting #2 receiver on most teams.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

He could challenge

Jacoby Jones.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

he makes deep plays with

Hasselbeck throwing to him. He’s gets good separation and makes great catches. I think we should call the catch against the Panthers the “laceration lasso”

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I argue

he could be a #1 on those teams… well maybe not the Chiefs…

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 3:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Michael Crabtree

Dwayne Bowe – Chiefs, Michael Williams – Bucs, Brandon Marshall – Dolphins, Amendola – Rams

Are you kidding? What in the world are you thinking.

So let’s hear the argument.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 3:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Bowe and Williams may go to the probowl

so you are calling Obomanu a pro-bowl caliber WR? Come on, this board is turning into some serious homerism crap.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry - Bowe

will go to the pro-bowl – he has 14 TDs. Leads all WRs.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Serious homerism?

Coming from the person who still defends Matt after so many shitty performances? He said Obomanu could be a # 2 on a lot of teams, and then you listed # 1’s? The line has changed the last couple of years, the receivers have changed, the coaches have changed, and our passing offense still sucks dick. What is the constant here? Matt Hasselbeck. Receivers? Please..Is that you Millen?

by Pessimistic Optimist on Dec 20, 2010 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

I responded to Lord Humongous

who listed teams where he believed Obo would be a #1.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

No, I was talking about #2s

and there’s no way in hell that Danny Amendola is a #1 WR.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 20, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Hasselbeck

Has looked like absolute crap lately. Have you seen me sticking up for him lately? I’m a little disgusted at the booing and general hatred towards him, but yes…his time has passed.

Let’s put Whitehurst in and let I’ll let everyone mock me when he leads us to the playoffs and the eventual NFC Championship.

by m_b on Dec 20, 2010 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

No need to create straw man

No one is saying Charlie is the guy who can take us to the Super Bowl. But what we can say, is that we don’t know if he can or not, and that is what we want to find out. In regards to Hasselbeck, enough is enough. Hasselbeck played absolutely horrible in his first three games going 43/86, 402 yards, 0 TD and 3 INT, yet Whitehurst can’t get any slack starting two games against the Falcons and Giants? Doesn’t seem right. Everybody deserves a chance. Matt got his chance, it’s time for Charlie to get his.

by Pessimistic Optimist on Dec 20, 2010 8:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Charlie didn't get to start against the Falcons either...

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 20, 2010 10:01 PM PST up reply actions  

If that's what Mike Williams has already, then two 100 yard games and two TD's and Mike Williams is probably in, at least on the bench.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

BMW has 60/720/1 right now

There’s no way he’s going to get get to 8 TDs but he might be able to reach 70/900 if we play well.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 21, 2010 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

I thought we were talking Mike Williams TB, and that he alreqady has better numbers.

"You tell me with confidence that you think Charlie could have done better and I will laugh beer in your face." JohnnyOsprey

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 21, 2010 10:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Actually I did say maybe not the Chiefs,

but Crabtree isn’t nearly as clean as Obo. He’s better in space, but Obo has such great big play capability (and he wins his 1 on 1 matchups and ain’t afraid to take a hit). As for Williams and Marshall; those guys can be bums sometimes.

Obo’s a bit of an unproven product. But I think there’s a lot of potential there. I’m actually more confounded by your lack of faith in Stokely. Did you never watch Denver

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 20, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

B-Marsh has three 100+ yard games this season.

I’ll take that kind of bum. Yeah, Obo’s got a lot of potential, but I’m not sure he’s even a clear-cut #2 in Miami (Davone Bess). He’s probably a #1 on the Rams, though, and a legit #2 in Tampa.

by thebyron on Dec 21, 2010 7:40 AM PST up reply actions  

I hear ya.

I was making a huge stretch. Although it’s not improbable to see Marshall & William’s potential attitude problems getting them benched for a less talented wideout.

Glad you brought up Bess. I think he deserves better than what he gets on that team.

Beam yourself up

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 22, 2010 10:03 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure Whitehurst went in after Tampa Bay tied the game at 7-7

not when the Hawks were well out of it…

What goes up must come down.
Sorry Duck fans

by Neil Vincent Roberts on Jan 1, 2011 5:29 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
A Fan's Reflection: Things I've Learned from a Casual 12th
Small
Seahawks Sacks: Statistical Analysis

Recent FanPosts

Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred
Horsey_small
What Doug Baldwin Had to Say About Seahawk QBs (or How DB Throws MF Under the Bus)
Retro_seattle_seahawks_by_mtspknwildcat_small
Dynasty League Fantasy Football
Small
Seahawks 2012 Active Roster Predictions
Marty_small
You should want Flynn to be our starter this year

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies