Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Army of Okung

Scene from 15 Yards in the Seahawks Backfield. Showing every Sunday from now until early January.

It takes one snap for Russell Okung to display how much better he is than his linemates.

Talent_medium

1-10-SEA 22 (10:46) 24-M.Lynch up the middle to SEA 30 for 8 yards (96-T.Brayton)

Okung gets a good jump, gets under 6'6" 280 pound defensive end Tyler Brayton and walks him back three yards past the line of scrimmage. Marshawn Lynch follows his left tackle. He zigs left and towards Brayton and Brayton is able to disengage enough to tackle Lynch. Lynch stumbles forward and is down after eight.

2-2-SEA 30 (10:17) 24-M.Lynch up the middle to SEA 25 for -5 yards (54-J.Williams).

Okung walks Brayton back two yards before disengaging and burying a shoulder into free safety Charles Godfrey. Godfrey staggers back one and a half yards.Running tally, Okung: 6.5 yards. Opponents: 0.

Behind Okung, Derek Landri has beat Stacy Andrews so badly that Andrews and Chris Baker are forced to hold Landri from behind as Landri closes and crushes Lynch. He has just received the hand off. Lynch does his best to beast through the tackle, but Panthers swarm and he's stopped in the backfield for a loss of five. It's a drive-killing screw up.

3-7-SEA 25 (9:34) 20-J.Forsett right tackle to SEA 30 for 5 yards (91-E.Brown). SEA-17-M.Williams was injured during the play. His return is Questionable.

Hasselbeck audibles out of shotgun and into a stretch right. It's a sound audible, especially against the Panthers 3-2 front. Two Seahawks do their job exceptionally well. Neither is Stacy Andrews or Sean Locklear.

Star-divide

The key here is Everette Brown is unblocked. He shouldn't factor so long as Justin Forsett can achieve a clean release into the second level. Okung pulls forward. Chris Spencer angle blocks Nick Hayden and it's a beauty of a block. With one shoulder, he pushes and turns Hayden and passes him to Mike Gibson. Gibson is stumbling over his own feet before he can even reach Hayden but he recovers and contains. Spencer and Okung combine to block outside linebacker James Anderson in the second level, and Anderson is rubbed out. He's not going to factor in this lifetime.

There is a moment before everything breaks down where it's clear how this play is supposed to work:

Vlcsnap-2010-12-07-14h46m12s217_medium

Brown is trailing. Williams is blocking corner Captain Munnerlyn on the right. Okung and Spencer have Hayden surrounded. In that seem between Locklear and Gibson-Andrews is great potential. Yet, you can already see how this play fails.

Charles Johnson dominates Locklear and as Forsett attempts to pass his inside shoulder, Johnson raise his right arm and hooks Forsett, slowing him. Jon Beason separates from Andrews and extends his left arm and grabs at Forsett.

Vlcsnap-2010-12-07-14h52m20s145_medium

Forsett slowed, Brown can catch him from behind. Force makes it five yards before being tackled from behind. He falls forward and onto Mike Williams left ankle.

Locklear gets some kind of pass because of the difficulty of his assignment. Andrews runs too far right, has to suddenly cut back in and barely touches Beeson before Beeson is making a play on Forsett.

Comment 63 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm not in love with Andrews either, but again the guy is a tackle playing guard.

I’m sure even Big Walt would have had trouble if he was forced to play guard.

by Coach Owens on Dec 7, 2010 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

So he's a potential replacement for Locklear at RT?

I wonder if we should have put Andrews at RT, and Locklear at RG.

by djafrot on Dec 7, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not saying it was a mistake or the logic was faulty,

but I just would be interested to know what the thinking was to go with this current alignment and not either switch or go with someone else at guard, either Lock or some guy off the Packer practice squad named Guido or Bruno or Otto or something.

by jacobstevens on Dec 7, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think that might be a good idea

I think the main reason why he’s at OG now is that the right side is the only part of the OL that’s had any continuity this year. No matter how talented the linemen are, a good OL needs players that have rapport.

I think he’s a FA after this year, so I’m not sure what his plans are, but I’d be disappointed if he wasn’t in camp next year.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I do think

that it would be playing more to Andrews’ strengths to match him up against smaller, lighter defensive ends than the 4-3 DT’s that have been destroying him all year. Fred Robbins, Richard Seymour, now Derek Landri…ugly.

by Brandon8 on Dec 7, 2010 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Andrews is a monster, though

He’s definitely the biggest guy on the OL and may be the biggest guy on the team. I don’t know what his problems are but size and strength shouldn’t be.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I've read repeatedly

that he’s a better guard than tackle. So…..yeah. He needs to be gone next year. And Locklear.

It's STILL Great to be a Florida Gator!
"Too many Urkels on this team, that's why our Wins-low." -Kanye West (slightly altered)

by Wayward Llama on Dec 7, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

He has tackle attributes, like height, arm length, agility relative to his size.

So people say he’s a tackle playing guard, when he’s played guard. Also because it had been due to injury situation and not because he played well or better as a guard.

Our coaches indicated specifically they got him to play guard. I don’t know if that was for thsi year only, and even if it was I don’t know if it’s not subject to change.

by jacobstevens on Dec 7, 2010 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Very good.

Not the linemen. The study.

by jacobstevens on Dec 7, 2010 3:28 PM PST reply actions  

Mike Gibson has actually looked decent this year.

No he’s not great but I don’t think I’ve seen him get outright beat this year. In that first picture, he’s walked his man back even further than Okung has.

by Coach Owens on Dec 7, 2010 3:32 PM PST reply actions  

My mistake.

Still, he hasn’t looked terrible from what I’ve seen. At least not Andrews or Locklear terrible.

by Coach Owens on Dec 7, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Nope, and he doesn't have a lot of dumb mistakes

like false starts, either.

It's STILL Great to be a Florida Gator!
"Too many Urkels on this team, that's why our Wins-low." -Kanye West (slightly altered)

by Wayward Llama on Dec 7, 2010 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

False starts are bad

but they’re not the worst sort of mistake an OL can make.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 5:38 PM PST up reply actions  

They're definitely a top-2

Unless you count random things like unsportsmanlike conduct, etc.

by Jackrabbit5683 on Dec 7, 2010 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Holding

and allowing opposing defenses to demolish the QB are worse. Sacks result in a loss of yards nearly equal to a false start, a loss of a down and a chance of injuring the most important player on the team.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 7:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Touche

By mistake I was thinking more along the lines of penalties. And I just always feel like a false start takes the wind out of your sails, so to speak.

by Jackrabbit5683 on Dec 7, 2010 9:50 PM PST up reply actions  

It shouldn't.

Since you don’t lose a down with a false start.

by djafrot on Dec 7, 2010 11:41 PM PST up reply actions  

So who on the roster besides Okung could be called a "good" OL?

If Okung is that much better than everyone else, will every other player on the OL need to be replaced before we see consistently good OL play out of the Hawks?

by Dialectic on Dec 7, 2010 3:48 PM PST reply actions  

Spencer is fine.

Everyone else should be replaced.

by John Morgan on Dec 7, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Do you think Willis can be a starter still?

I suffer from IBS, otherwise known as "Influx of Billick Syndrome".

by SSreporters on Dec 7, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure. Willis isn't so bad

but you don’t necessarily want to start Willis. Someone that can be in the mix.

by John Morgan on Dec 7, 2010 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

OG Rodney Hudson is a fringe first-rounder and would fit like a glove in the ZBS...

I’m just not sure if that’s what we’re even running anymore. Hudson might have to gain some weight to keep his stock aloft, a la Charles Brown.

by Brandon8 on Dec 7, 2010 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Hudson is a guy that relies on technique and execution

He may be physically overmatched in the NFL or not have a ton of room to grow.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Hudson is much more athletic than Unger

but I am also concerned about his size. Twenty years ago, he could have been a stud, but I’d rather not watch him matched against 3-4 ends.

by John Morgan on Dec 7, 2010 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Or he could turn out to be an elite talent

that was overlooked because he doesn’t have prototypical size for an NFL OL. That’s the gamble of the draft. You never know.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't want to take that chance

I have personally had it with ‘grit’, ‘savvy’, skilled, ‘hustle’, undersized, heady, technique, finess, etc. I have seen way too many Seahawks games lost over the years as we are pushed around and dominated by larger, stronger, more athletic opposing lines.

A west-coast, “finess” team that falls apart in the snow or when the timing isn’t there.

Technique can be taught, and skills improved, but it is hard to teach athleticism, size and strength.

Unger is just the latest example of the failures of that line of thinking. Tats (when he was great) is a possible counter-example, but also hasn’t had a long run of dominance either — perhaps the edge for success for the undersized is thin.

I’d rather bet on bigger, stronger, faster horses building this team. The race may not always go their way, but that is the smart bet.

by IslandHawk on Dec 7, 2010 5:27 PM PST up reply actions  

but you said he should be replaced.

So you’re saying that the odds are not good that he’ll turn into a starter, so the Seahawks might as well look for a replacement.

Makes sense.

by djafrot on Dec 8, 2010 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I see a reasonably high possibility that Unger becomes the O-line version of CraigTerrrill

Hustle, savvy, grit and technique balancing a lack of raw ability, size, and strength but never consistently overcoming.

by IslandHawk on Dec 8, 2010 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess that means he'll be decent depth.

Especially since he can play both center and guard.

by djafrot on Dec 8, 2010 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

True. Just was hoping for more/better

Who, knows, maybe he will bulk up, work on strength, leverage and technique, while retaining his quickness and agility and gradually fulfill his original potential. Some guys are late bloomers physically and mentally.

by IslandHawk on Dec 8, 2010 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

How long have we been waiting on Spencer to develop? How long has Unger had?

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 8, 2010 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't remember Spencer ever looking as bad as Unger

but there’s no reason to give up on someone that’s cheap and under contract.

by John Morgan on Dec 9, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Solid analysis.

Thank you John, reading these for the past couple of years have helped me watch the games in realtime with a critical eye. I find my self looking at questions I have with your process.

So Okung, Spencer and Unger, and they keep the depth they have and look to draft and pick up players via free agency, but for whatnkind of system? Will they abandon the zone blocking scheme all together and go a different route?

by The-Wes on Dec 7, 2010 4:11 PM PST reply actions  

Depends on who is hired on to coach the offensive line.

There more I see how limited and uncreative this rush attack is, the more I think Gibbs’ sudden retirement is a big part of why Seattle’s rush attack is broken.

by John Morgan on Dec 7, 2010 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I think they're related

If I remember correctly, we didn’t have much success running the ball in preseason. I think a lot of our problems have to do with continuity, trust and communication on the OL (kumbaya!). Lynch, Andrews and many of our LGs weren’t around for camp and we’ve gone through something like 9 or 10 different OL combinations in our 13 games.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Trying too hard can be detrimental, definitely.

Case in point, the goal line runs that serendipity offered up.

by jacobstevens on Dec 7, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I think those were more about team culture than anything else

Pete is into this New Age “positive thinking” thing. I think the goofy challenges and 4th-and-goal situations are more about trying to motivate the team and developing a hard-nosed culture (fighting for something rather than taking the easy, conservative route). I’m not sure if this sort of thing (trying to squeeze the best out of players rather than playing the safest possible schemes) will help in the long run, but I think its probably a big part of his coaching philosophy.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I've seen it a thousand times, though.

What I’m alluding to. Good teams, bad teams, good players, bad players, Eddie George as a Cowboy even. Which is startlingly bad. Goal line in sight, when just another yard, just getting past one guy, just getting enough push against your assignment, is all it takes to get six, lot of guys suddenly are a lot more capable.

Even though running period opened up later on in the game against Carolina, I still saw a difference between the goal line runs and the successful runs outside the red zone, excepting Forsett’s beautiful runs which might have been his best all year.

by jacobstevens on Dec 7, 2010 5:31 PM PST up reply actions  

And Gibbs never really had a chance to work with a starting OL unit

He wasn’t going to be making much progress if he couldn’t lead the same 5 guys for more than a game or two at a time. Gibbs’ system requires a high degree of continuity and familiarity and it just wasn’t possible to develop it, given the injury issues.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Will carrol just defer to the new coach?

What kind of system Has he run historically? I’m wondering if he will forsake the strengths of our current players to go in a new direction. I see him being able to handpick and coach up a lower round qb than a line man , maybe o and d line should dominate our first picks. Just thinking this thru….

by The-Wes on Dec 7, 2010 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

He hand picked Whitehurst and has been coaching him up.

We need to get a QB high. That is our main priority in the draft. In Free Agency you can get OL,but can’t pick up a franchise QB.

by PhoneHomeET29 on Dec 8, 2010 7:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

So it looks like Polumbus should play RG, move Andrews out to RT and

then draft more O-linemen next year? I’m tired of the lack of depth on this team but that is something that can take awhile to develop.

John Hancock

by mrcoffee1969 on Dec 8, 2010 7:19 AM PST reply actions  

John - Any chance that you have checked out how Trent Williams has performed for the Redskins?

I know that Carroll and Co. were a bit surprised that Okung was still available in the draft… I also realize that 3/4 of a season does not a good data set make, but it seems that Okung plays with an edge that is desirable in a LT. I guess I feel like we sure got the ‘right’ guy… do the Redskins feel the same?

by dassler10 on Dec 8, 2010 9:16 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
A Fan's Reflection: Things I've Learned from a Casual 12th
Small
Seahawks Sacks: Statistical Analysis

Recent FanPosts

Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred
Horsey_small
What Doug Baldwin Had to Say About Seahawk QBs (or How DB Throws MF Under the Bus)
Retro_seattle_seahawks_by_mtspknwildcat_small
Dynasty League Fantasy Football
Small
Seahawks 2012 Active Roster Predictions
Marty_small
You should want Flynn to be our starter this year

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies