But at least McNabb can still win games, more so than Matt.

I wouldn’t be a big fan either unless he’s available cheap. And I doubt that.

But McNabb wouldn’t be terrible, either. He’s at least got a few more years in him, unlike Matt.

McNabb is 33.

Perhaps the difference is what one is willing to sell in order to be good now. Personally, I would be willing to give up #6 for Kolb or #40 for McNabb.

Kolb would certainly give us youth with upside at QB while projecting maturity to tie to the defenses projection.

Of course PC is all about “win now” but that is just a platitude. Get used to them but revel in the fact that the platitudes will be better than Jimmy “Nasty” Mora’s weekly spewings.

I am all for decisions to keep the sea-chickens competitive in the West as long as we don’t sell the future (ie, McNabb for #6).

Just a thought but has anyone seen how AZ has come back to division avg this offseason? Seems to me that the West is still pretty open but should be SF’s to take.

Living in Seattle, I’ve followed the hawks quite a bit and watched games as well. I highly doubt I’m the only one who feels this way, but do a lot of you guys feel Seneca could actually have succeeded as an NFL starter?
 He was quick and could scramble around while throwing slants and curl routes, but I never saw him as a true potential starter. And he’s basically been riding the bench for the better part of 7 years, except for several games when Matt was out with injury..

The ‘win now’ comment is something I view as that of an ESPN reporter. I didn’t see a direct quote from Carroll, did you? This is the time for rumor-mongering and attention-getting by media types and bloggers. For Seattle not to look into acquiring Kolb would be not doing what our FO is paid to do. We need QB help. How serious these inquiry’s are remains to be seen.

I also agree w/ the above poster that McNabb has a few years left in the tank – Hasselbeck doesn’t have any years left, really. I’d be thrilled with Kolb. If McNabb came cheaply enough (like a 4th round pick or something) that would be acceptable, if not perferable. I’d much rather pay a near-premium for Kolb than anything in the same ballpark for McNabb. We are not close to making a SB run. We need youth at the position. McNabb would be nothing more than a two-year stopgap.

At least he can help coach Rothlisberger on how to act off the field.

Passing drivers were wondering why I was screaming things like “NO YOU STUPID DUMBFUCK” at my dashboard.

CSN Philly is a fairly reliable source.

Trade #14 for Kolb, #40 and spare parts for Marshall.

Then pick up a big ugly LT at #6. I don’t love any of the tackles that high, but given a promising QB and top 3 WR, you could live with the reach. OR trade down and nab an extra mid round pick.

I don’t think I’d take a flyer on Kolb in most scenarios, but thought I’d throw this wackadoodle one out there.

but could you really expect to come away with much better than Marshall and Kolb for those two picks? They’re a couple years older than any rookie you’d take and Marshall is likely going to cost more than the 6th pick would, but they’re also more proven and ready to contribute now while still being a part of the teams future.

*"John Morgan" excuse me.

That, and he was grossly incompetent. The firing was justified.

Yeah, insane. Sorry Philly. You’re not getting two firsts for the guy. I guess that’s probably a way for them to say “We’re really not interested in letting him go, unless you’re fucking crazy enough to give us two first round picks.”