Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation MMA Rankings for August 2010

The Tim Ruskell Mock Draft

Someone mentioned that they like mock drafts not for their accuracy but because they present a list of players in a fun, readable format. Eventually I would like to post what I consider realistic mock drafts for the Seahawks. Today I present the exact opposite: A hypothetical mock draft.

The history here is simple: Tim Ruskell never resigns and is instead signed to an extension. Jim Mora gets the axe. Keeping with Ruskell tradition, the team makes no major or disharmonious coaching decisions but instead simply promotes Dan Quinn. We're left with the 2009 coaching staff minus Mora.

Free agency is typically active and Seattle signs Julius Peppers to an eleventy billion dollar contract. Patrick Kerney is dropped with the forced-restructure/pennies-on-the-dollar-trade method employed to move Julian Peterson. I don't know what we get in return. A box of donuts. Peppers is the draw, but he must be complemented with an aging veteran counterpunch that undoes any value Seattle reaps by signing him. LaDainian Tomlinson it is.

6. Eric Berry: Ruskell knows he must rebuild the offense to contend again, but the prospect of drafting a low-risk, ultra-talented safety beguiles him. Pundits applaud Ruskell for drafting the best available talent while excusing concerns that Matt Hasselbeck is washed up.

(Ruskell trades the #14 pick and Seattle's seventh round pick to Philadelphia for the Eagles #24 pick, #70 pick and second pick in the fourth round)

24. Brian Bulaga: Ruskell ignores concerns about overall athleticism and future health and instead selects the tackle that scouts best: Brian Bulaga. Bulaga is everything you expect in a Ruskell pick: good tape, good teammate, major conference, successful program, leader, reasonably scheme correct and a likely faller because sexier picks will eclipse him.

40. Colt McCoy: Seattle finally gets its quarterback of the future when Ruskell selects the winneringest winner in college football history. In the flush of celebration, Tim Tebow rushes to Colt and gives him a bear hug, enveloping the fragile quarterback and creating a fatal rise in blood pressure that McCoy's tiny, wholesome heart can not counter. Seriously though, McCoy is a dead wringer for what Ruskell wants in a quarterback, minus maybe that he's shorter than prototypical.

70: Jon Asamoah:

Star-divide

107: Syd'Quan Thompson: What Thompson lacks in size or speed, he makes up for by being very good at football. It didn't surprise me when Thompson elected not to run at the Combine and then put up poor times in his pro day, perhaps the first thing I noticed is that he plays with a huge cushion to avoid being burned. When he plays up, he can't flip his hips and run. The agility is there, but the burst and top end speed is not. His awareness and ball skills must somehow overcome these basic flaws, and if he can play closer to 200, he has overall skill-set of a Cover 2 corner.

130. Ben Tate: Tough inside rusher and three-down back that shouldn't last this long but might, Tate fits the Ruskell profile: Two year starter and three year contributor at Auburn, successful, underappreciated athlete, and solid screen receiver to fit Knapp's offense.

140: Arthur Jones: Ruskell typically stayed away from injured players, but Jones' torn pectoral should not cause too much concern. The torn lateral meniscus in his knee is worrisome, but with Jones tumbling and arguably among the best defensive tackles in the draft, Ruskell breaks character a bit, if only to honor other biases. Jones is humble and hard working and a team leader, and scouts better than he performs in drills.

179: Shay Hodge: Big-bodied receiver with decent production but not great tape, Hodge is a late riser that probably can not translate his practice skills to the football field.

Poll
Is the hypothetical Tim Ruskell draft better or worse than you expect from the actual Seahawks draft?
Better
265 votes
Worse
534 votes
Midget
225 votes

1024 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 87 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Field Gulls

Fall Forward, Anthony McCoy

Sep 2010 by John Morgan - 5 comments

Seahawks Worth Drafting and Why

Aug 2010 by John Morgan - 30 comments

*The Mansfield Wrotto Plan

Aug 2010 by John Morgan - 24 comments

Comments

Display:

I voted worse but I gotta say I'd like this draft just fine.

It’s just not better than Clausen, Brown and Houston. I really have no idea if thats what Carroll will do but thats what I’ve got set in my head.

by Nate Dogg on Mar 12, 2010 3:33 PM PST reply actions  

I'm shocked Ruskell didn't take Arenas. He's your classic midget.

The Seattle Seahawks offense is driving......right into a brick wall at the end of the tunnel.

by SSreporters on Mar 12, 2010 3:51 PM PST reply actions  

It's a good, fun read

Are you trying to tell us you don’t like Bulaga as a pick. Haven’t seen or read anything that makes he think he wouldn’t be a decent choice. If not maybe at the slots we have. Similar with McCoy. Do you not want him? Do they fit Ruskell but not you?

by Scotia Seahawk on Mar 12, 2010 4:09 PM PST reply actions  

I said better, if only because Ben Tate,

Syd’Quan Thompson (prefer Walt Thurmond), and Art Jones would make me salivate.

Personally, I’m not a huge Berry or Bulaga fan though. I think they offer ‘false security’ in that they seem safe, but I fee like the red flags are bigger than people are saying. Bulaga’s short arms have me worried and I wonder if he won’t end up like Gallery on the right side, and while there’s nothing wrong with that, I believe the whole offensive line is a bit overvalued except for the LT position.

Though I can’t think of anything more underwhelming than Colt McCoy at #40.

by LantermanC on Mar 12, 2010 4:10 PM PST reply actions  

No top 5 team except Detroit

has an un-counterable reason not to draft Clauford. Rams and Bucs have no encouraging option at the position, Campbell might really be near his peak and Cassel hasn’t proved to be elite yet either. I think whether Clauford are available at 6 or not will hinge on StL, TB, KC, and WASH’s balance of need-vs.-bpa…although I suppose Clauford aren’t universally accepted as top 5 picks either. Gah! Burn all this uncertainty…

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Mar 12, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

KC spent a gajillion on Cassel's contract

Like it or not, those dollars matter in decisions like this. In part, that’s why the Rams stuck with Bulger for too long.

by G'd Up on Mar 12, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Who's the backup in KC?

I mean if they like Clauford enough who knows? Or am I ignorant and a pure BPA decision never happens..?

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Mar 12, 2010 7:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Also watched

 The offenecse, Seneca et all, play the worst offensive game I seen in a long time

by Scotia Seahawk on Mar 12, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

You're right

My Wallace connection is to the previous season which is indelibly etched in my brain as the most depressing regular season game I’ve watched.
Especially as It was a Monday night game and they are late here.
Last season’s Tampa game was palatable by comparison.
Corrected.

by Scotia Seahawk on Mar 12, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

That was a Sunday night game.

The one where Kelly Jennings fell by himself.

The Seattle Seahawks offense is driving......right into a brick wall at the end of the tunnel.

by SSreporters on Mar 12, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Really?

Could have sworn it was a Monday night special. Only remember I was cursing staying up that late to watch ‘this pish’ Oh well time passes. Nothing last season felt so deflating as that game. Only more inevitable.

by Scotia Seahawk on Mar 12, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Seattle didn't get an MNF game that year.

The thing is Seattle had their chances to get back in the game but the offense was moribund.

The Seattle Seahawks offense is driving......right into a brick wall at the end of the tunnel.

by SSreporters on Mar 12, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, Seattle's passing offense was horrifying in that game.

Hasselbeck unveiled the Hasseltoss and threw 4 INTs.

The Seattle Seahawks offense is driving......right into a brick wall at the end of the tunnel.

by SSreporters on Mar 12, 2010 5:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Those rookie QBs are dangerous when you're completely uninterested in actual pressure.

The Seattle Seahawks offense is driving......right into a brick wall at the end of the tunnel.

by SSreporters on Mar 12, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

One of very few shining moments for Freeman.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Mar 12, 2010 7:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Cheddar I disagree on one point....

Do you forget that the bucs just spent a first on Josh Freeman who they seem to be enamored with?

by Seahawks4life on Mar 12, 2010 4:32 PM PST reply actions  

I guess I'm not very aware of the attitude towards Freeman in Tampa Bay

So if they are enamored as you say then I would concede that. But it’s not like his play was impressive overall (I’m basing this on what little I saw of him in the NE game and off statistics).

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Mar 12, 2010 7:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Worst scenario

Both QBs and both DTs are off the board.. Then you have a wide open choice and maybe nothing you value at 6 money.

by Scotia Seahawk on Mar 12, 2010 4:37 PM PST reply actions  

If that happend, and you couldn't trade the pick...

I think the only viable picks would be Berry or Morgan. Unless they really think one of the other LTs would be substantially better than Charles Brown at #14.

by Mind of no mind on Mar 12, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

If both QBs and both DTs are gone

I think we then try to work a trade for Kolb while we’re on the clock.

by Frostbite43 on Mar 12, 2010 7:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah at that point,

I can see a trade being a very desirable scenario – be it for a player or to move back or whatever.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Mar 12, 2010 7:35 PM PST up reply actions  

This is very good.

Very much what Ruskell would probably do. And actually wouldn’t be that bad of a draft. I am against drafting Bulaga way more than I realize I should be.

Like was said, not as good as what I hope us to draft, but honestly wouldn’t be that bad. Fantastic job.

by jacobstevens on Mar 12, 2010 4:53 PM PST reply actions  

You totally forgot about Brian Russell...

If Ruskell were here, how can you ignore the fact that Brian Russell is a threat to be drafted each and every year. Age and draft protocol be damned. You can never injected enough grit into your team.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Mar 12, 2010 5:20 PM PST reply actions  

Oh... You think it's easy do you SSReporter Guy??

I’d like to see you cover trips Pachycephalosaurians right.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Mar 12, 2010 5:29 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

And the pterodactyls flying wheel routes???

It’s well known that instant grit relates to your heart…. not your vertical.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Mar 12, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

And you thought that Quest was loud?

How about trying to read offensive adjustments with a freaking volcano erupting.

I’m done here. " pfft".

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.

by iverson2169 on Mar 12, 2010 5:53 PM PST up reply actions  

He's not worth quite tenty billion.

But it sounds like the going rate for a player of his years and caliber.

by Chirp on Mar 12, 2010 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Wistrom, Fisher, Kerney,...Peppers.

Welcome to the one-year ultra-expensive, aging DE factory. Don’t mind my crippling salary: I’ll be good for 3 or more years, I promise!

by Misfit74 on Mar 12, 2010 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Would Peppers really belong on that list?

And Fisher wasn’t ultra expensive or old when he was signed.

by Nate Dogg on Mar 12, 2010 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

It's hard to tell about Peppers.

I’ll tell you next year if he belongs on the list, but I’d say they overpaid for him, and at tenty billion, he’s definitely not worth it.

by Chirp on Mar 12, 2010 10:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Great picture

Funny, that is the one regular season game I attended this year. Jake did his best to tease and give a win, but alas, a fumbled punt return with just under 2 minutes left sealed the deal.

No one at Carolina seemingly cares Peppers is gone. Good riddance.

It is what it is...

by kidder95 on Mar 12, 2010 7:13 PM PST reply actions  

Most of the prospects are safe, solid and:

Unspectacular. This drafting method has led to a true lack of playmaking, exciting, and/or elite talents. Lacks difference-makers, explosiveness, and everything else except for character and perhaps value. In a nutshell this typical Ruskell draft reads best as boring. Boring safe picks. I really hope the new regime has the balls to risk more – swing for the fences once in awhile. Don’t add a choir-boy from the SEC when you can add a Chris Johnson…or a Brandon Marshall.

by Misfit74 on Mar 12, 2010 7:36 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Not yet.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Mar 12, 2010 10:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Not without an offense to keep the defense from playing 40+ minutes a game.

The defense being on the field for so long was the most frustrating thing about the 2009 season. Those guys couldn’t sit on the bench for more than a couple of minutes before the offense gave the ball back.

by Wilder. on Mar 13, 2010 12:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Exciting, elite, playmaking picks in the top 10?

Are harder to avoid then to make, unless you’re picking linemen.

by Vasilii on Mar 13, 2010 7:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Chris Johnson was not available at the Seahawks 2008 pick.

Nor was Brandon Marshall available in the fourth round, and since Seattle had traded its third, it would have had to pick Marshall in the second. Which would have been stupid.

So, by your estimation, Lofa Tatupu and Leroy Hill were not difference makers that helped Seattle make the Super Bowl?

Josh Wilson and Aaron Curry are not explosive?

John Carlson is not a playmaker?

by John Morgan on Mar 13, 2010 7:32 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Those guys are all good but, and some are great

But why is it that when I think of the Seahawks, I can’t think of any stars? I feel like there isn’t anyone on our team where it’s like, “Don’t worry, we’ve got him, we’re gonna be okay.”

Maybe I’m just being cynical, but I can’t name a single player like that on our team.

by Cannonater on Mar 13, 2010 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't know why you think that, but I don't think that is a substantial criticism.

Stars do not make a good football team. Stars are often the reward for being a bad football team. Maybe if Seattle continues to lose, we can have a Calvin Johnson starring for our terrible team.

by John Morgan on Mar 13, 2010 9:25 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

To further my perception of the Ruskell picks:

Ruskell’s picks often have a ‘high-floor’ in conjunction with a ‘capped ceiling’. His picks are usually safe. Bulaga is a safe pick. His athleticism and ability isn’t elite and likely projects as more the solid player and a multi-year starter that you can count on rather than a potential dominant player at his position with some added risk.

Carlson is a solid player. He still doesn’t have the ability to really threaten the seam deep. Solid, safe, productive. Jermichael Finley? Elite athlete capable of stretching defenses and being a dominant player at his position. I love Carlson, but he’ll never be confused with the best player at his position.

An explosive nickle-corner is just how valuable for a first-day pick? I love Wilson and yes, he and Curry are explosive. I’m not going to delve into why the LB position is or isn’t the best use of resources and may or may not be a transformative or possibly even a fungible position. I really like Tats and Hill. I love our LB corps. How much can Tatupu lose before decline? Has it already begun? He again is a safe, somewhat limited athlete. I love him and his football I.Q. is off the charts. I’m just pointing out that maybe he doesn’t have quite the career that an athlete like Demeco Ryans does. Tats can’t afford to lose much speed or quickness. He’s a keeper, though. :)

When I used the term explosive, I was thinking DE (risk a pick on Pierre-Paul or Morgan?) but mostly offense. Again, in this draft, the offense is neglected at the skill positions. No RB, No WR. Two areas that have been neglected for too long. I really look forward to this draft. Ruskell did a good job and this draft would undoubtedly help our team. Solid, safe, and not much hope for our offense other than an improved line. I like both OT and OG picks. I believe in building w/ the lines. I just wonder about the ‘high-floor, low ceiling’ long term effect and the again defense-oriented draft

by Misfit74 on Mar 13, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Finley ran a 4.82 at the NFL Combine and jumped 27 1/2 inches

Carlson ran a 4.88 and jumped 30 1/2 inches—with the flu. He then ran a 4.72 and jumped 35 1/2" at his pro day. I am pretty sure Carlson is both a better receiver and equal athlete to Finley. Unfortunately, he was not surrounded by the Green Bay offense.

Tatupu is so much better than Ryans it saddens me that you would compare the two.

by John Morgan on Mar 14, 2010 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

That isn't meant to demean Ryans, either

but Tats started like a legend. It saddens me that after a couple injury hampered seasons, Seahawks fans are forgetting how incredible he was.

by John Morgan on Mar 14, 2010 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

That settles it.

My next jersey’s gonna have to be a Carlson.

by thebyron on Mar 14, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great Article Idea

I have to say that I don’t really agree with all the Ruskell bashing going on. I believe that character counts in any working environment. Ruskell had his faults but the draft wasn’t one of them. Ruskell had an extremely low bust rate and usually drafted guys well below their value (Tatupu, Mebane, Carlson, etc). The lack of elite talent speaks to the low draft position rather than overly conservative picks in my opinion. You are not going to find QB’s and LTs that you build around when you are consistently picking in the mid twenties.

by Wrecko on Mar 13, 2010 2:40 AM PST reply actions  

I agree to an extent.

I think Ruskell did not deserve to have his contract renewed due to the current condition of the franchise, which happend under his watch. But at the same time, I think overall, he was wasn’t a bad GM when it came to draft day. Not great, but not bad either.

by Mind of no mind on Mar 13, 2010 4:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Can't really evaluate without knowledge of other team's picks

It’s a plausible, albeit worst case, scenario where the QBs, 2 DTs, and Okung are already selected by the time Seattle’s #6 rolls around. In that context, Eric Berry may well be the best pick. But, yeah, context is everything. Who do we pass up to make these picks?

I will say that it would be pretty Ruskellian to take Berry with Clausen or Okung still on the board.

by Keasley on Mar 13, 2010 8:22 AM PST reply actions  

I sort of expected this to be more tongue-in-cheek.

Tebow at #6! Myron Rolle at #14!

Very cool idea though, I enjoyed this.

by thebyron on Mar 13, 2010 1:08 PM PST reply actions  

Loss of 2 yards

The opposing defense was loading up on the run because we failed to address our problems at QB and LT.

Either we draft Tebow to be our QB, or something else; if we jerk him around he’ll turn out like Seneca.

by J.L. White on Mar 13, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Not quite realistic

  Berry, great pick . Bulaga, I don’t think will last to 24, in fact will probably be taken by 15th. Don’t like Colt at all for a QB, and Asmaoah probably won’t last until 70. The others are good, I think. Of course, i have to remember that this is if TR is still here.
  Still you cannot take a player that won’t be there. Bulaga won’t be there at 24, I’m sure.
  Would prefer that we go with Berry, move down at 14 and draft CBrown. Then on to 40 with a WR, like Damian Williams or maybe Demaryious Thomas or a DB like Nate Allen. Thats’ JMHO

by BUSTINHEADS on Mar 13, 2010 3:01 PM PST reply actions  

This is a good draft because I reconize the names taken

When Seattle drafts players I haven’t heard of in all the mock drafts it confound me.

by Surf Hawk on Mar 13, 2010 11:12 PM PST reply actions  

Ok, that made me laugh

Although I am increasingly more optimistic on Tebow as an NFL player even though he seems a huge reach in the first two rounds.

by IslandHawk on Mar 14, 2010 9:02 AM PST reply actions  

Yes, given the problems with his mechanics, etc., most analysts (and his draft position) likely agree

Although there is a chance he will overcome and be good. Or maybe he will miraculously make it as a safety or tight end, or…
Someone is likely to gamble on him. Long odds, but could be a good payoff, or he could be out of the league in a couple years. shrug

by IslandHawk on Mar 14, 2010 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jj_flag_detail1_small
United Way
Leonwashington_small
Seahawk Fans in SF?

Recent FanPosts

Dave_small
OT: 2010 SB Nation Madden 11 Online Season for Xbox 360
Screen_shot_2010-07-12_at_11
FG Fantasy Football: NFC DRAFT REMINDER - TONIGHT 7:30pm PST
Seahawks-logo-011-150x150_small
Ravens are seeking trades to upgrade at multiple positions.
2003876984_small
Potential For a Resurgent Passing Offense
Small
Arizona Cardinals attempted to aquire Hasselbeck
Momustgo_small
Over/Under
Small
Allow me some latitude to engage in rosterbation, if you please
Flags_800x600_small
Hawktimus Prime

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PITTSBURGH - AUGUST 25:  Byron Leftwich #4 of the Pittsburgh Steelers warms up prior to the preseason game against the Carolina Panthers on September 2 2010 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

Steelers Quarterback Byron Leftwich Leaves Game With Left Knee Injury

CHICAGO - AUGUST 28: Matt Leinart #7 of the Arizona Cardinals walks in the bench area during a preseason game against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field on August 28 2010 in Chicago Illinois. The Cardinals defeated the Bears 14-9. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) +2 updates

Leinart Playing Perhaps Final Game In Arizona As Cardinals Finish Preseason Vs. Redskins

Photo

Brady, Manning Make It Through Final Preseason Game Unscathed, Giants Edge Pats, 20-17

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Screen_shot_2010-07-12_at_11 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small Doug Farrar

Catch_small Vasilii

Dksbtwit_small Johnny Peel (DKSB)

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig