Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

The Welcome Worst of Lamarr Houston

Lamarr Houston had a solid first half. He had an excellent second half. Did he try harder? I doubt it. Could his coaches have adjusted his role and technique to better take advantage of his skills? It didn't look like it. Was he gutty, in the moment, suffered a rush of heart and grit? Eh.

It could have been little more than truth revealed by an extended sample size. A player does not have an ability but a range of abilities. Michael Boulware was sometimes sensational but often problematic, and the latter effectively ended his career as a starter. Major snaps revealed his incomplete skill set. He was, quite literally, a linebacker playing safety. Part was that he could not repeat, but only flashed excellence. No sport better reveals that we are both our best and our worst than golf, and in golf, it's always your worst that wins out.

It's fair to say Houston was consistent even if his performance was not. He did not have many soaring highs like teammate Sergio Kindle, but didn't suffer a single embarrassment either. He was pancaked once, but because he lost his balance and not because he was driven back. I think Houston's consistency is part of why his performance improved as the game went on. His opponent's lagged, but Houston kept bringing it. His conditioning seems admirable, and as such, he could be a bit of a closer: A player that pops in the fourth quarter.

His experience as an end makes him a special talent at tackle. Houston doesn't just gap well, he has a good set of pass rush moves, varied and skilled, and seems to know which to use to get separation. That he also stands strong against double teams is a testament to his lower body bulk. He flashed a swim early, and showed a rip and a forklift later on. A forklift, most often associated with Jumpy Geathers, involves the end pushing the offensive lineman's arms up, getting under him, exposing his chest and then bulling for the kill.

The one ability Houston lacks is consistent quickness off the snap. He was regularly a beat behind his linemates, only a handful of times showed good timing and explosion, and a few times was inexcusably slow, to his and his team's detriment. That he turned those slow jumps into pass rush speaks to his excellent potential. He fights well, angles well, is pretty agile, very aware and has a good closing burst.

Potential, to be great? Can we ever be sure? We can talk about upside, but upside is awfully hard to know. Houston does not have the pure athleticism of Suh or McCoy, and within those parameters, I can say with confidence that Suh or McCoy each have a much better shot at Canton than Houston. If the question is, how likely is it that Houston is good? That Houston will be a good player, with a good peak, a chance to earn a Pro Bowl bid, that can assume a position and command it for years, how likely is that?

Extremely.

Star-divide

1. 1st and 10 at ALA 6 Trent Richardson rush for 3 yards to the Alab 9.

RDE, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Double teamed, splits, isolates James Carpenter, wins leverage but does not factor.

2. 2nd and 7 at ALA 9 Trent Richardson rush for 9 yards to the Alab 18 for a 1ST down.

RDE, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Submarines Mike Johnson. DNF.

3. 1st and 10 at ALA 18 Trent Richardson rush for 3 yards to the Alab 21.

RDE, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Hits, sheds but DNF.

4. 2nd and 7 at ALA 21 Greg McElroy pass incomplete to Roy Upchurch.

RDT, 1-tech, 4 down linemen. Angles wide right, runs into a double team, and does not factor further on a quick pass to the right flat.

5. 3rd and 7 at ALA 21 Greg McElroy pass complete to Trent Richardson for 8 yards to the Alab 29, TEXAS penalty offside defense declined for a 1ST down.

RDT, 1-tech, 3 down linemen. Explodes into Mike Johnson, hits him hard under the arms and gets into his body. Houston separates, pressures McElroy, McElroy moves to his left and Johnson recovers to clear Houston. Houston attempts to pursue from behind, but it's a quick check down pass and he never nears McElroy.

6. 1st and 10 at ALA 29 TEXAS penalty 15 yard pass interference accepted, no play.

LDT, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Houston is initially double teamed, but fights into a single team, pushes, but does not factor.

7. 1st and 10 at ALA 44 Trent Richardson rush for 2 yards to the Texas 39, TEXAS penalty 15 yard personal foul accepted for a 1ST down.

LDT, 3-tech, 4 down linemen. Great pure tackle moment here as Houston pursues right while riding right guard Barrett Jones, moves off Jones and onto Johnson, fights through Johnson, cuts behind and ankle tackles Richardson. Kindle is flagged for hands to the face.

8. 1st and 10 at TEX 39 Trent Richardson rush for 1 yard to the Texas 38.

RDT, 3-tech, 4 down linemen. Explosive jump, easily his best, cuts into and through a double team and tackles Richardson.

9. 2nd and 9 at TEX 38 Trent Richardson rush for 4 yards to the Texas 34.

LDT, 3-tech, 4 down linemen. Another solid jump, strikes Jones, attempts to angle wide and is pancaked.

10. 3rd and 5 at TEX 34 Greg McElroy pass incomplete to Julio Jones.

RDT, 3-tech, 4 down linemen. Good jump, swats but can't separate.

(Missed field goal)

(Texas pulls within 3)

1. 1st and 10 at ALA 35 Greg McElroy pass complete to Mark Ingram for 7 yards to the Alab 42.

LDT, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Decent jump, moves right, slaps Drew Davis away and pressures McElroy.

2. 2nd and 3 at ALA 42 Mark Ingram rush for 19 yards to the Texas 39 out-of-bounds for a 1ST down.

LDT, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Stands up and separates from Davis, but does not factor on a rush left.

3. 1st and 10 at TEX 39 Mark Ingram rush for 1 yard to the Texas 38.

LDT, 3-tech, 4 down linemen. Stands up and holds ground against Jones, moves right and falls into the pile.

4. 2nd and 9 at TEX 38 Mark Ingram rush for 1 yard to the Texas 37.

RDT, 3-tech, 3 down linemen. Great jump, rips through Carpenter, forces Ingram's rush lane wide and attempts but misses an ankle tackle.

5. 3rd and 8 at TEX 37 Greg McElroy pass incomplete to Darius Hanks.

NT. Good jump, forces back the center and left guard, putting an arm on each, but stops, sees the pocket collapsing around McElroy, but can't factor as he's pushed out of the play.

(Fumble puts Alabama on the Texas 3.)

(Houston shows good explosion in goal line situations. He creates a pile, but does not otherwise factor.)

(Alabama scores when Ingram bounces off the pile and lunges left.)

(Gilbert throws an interception.)

(Houston shows good fight, even blowing through a blocker and tackling Richardson, but the game is over.)

Comment 73 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's sad that I already have

6. Clausen
14. Brown
40. Houston
engrained in my mind.

by LantermanC on Mar 2, 2010 3:07 PM PST reply actions  

Agreed

"Good fortune does not come solely to the just, nor bad fortune to the unjust. When the weather is good for crops, it is also good for weeds."

-Theodore Roosevelt

by Blake Jensen on Mar 2, 2010 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I bet we could

drop from 14, pick up a third and still get Brown..

by Hawkdawg on Mar 3, 2010 10:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe

I think I would be OK with Bulaga too, but I want to look more into him.

"Good fortune does not come solely to the just, nor bad fortune to the unjust. When the weather is good for crops, it is also good for weeds."

-Theodore Roosevelt

by Blake Jensen on Mar 3, 2010 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Why do you think he isn't considered to be a first rounder?

Most draft “analysts” rate Brian Price, Dan Williams, Jared Odrick, etc ahead of him. I mean, I can understand Suh and McCoy, but just reading scouting reports on Price makes Houston seems far superior to him. Is it just the athleticism and explosion?

"Good fortune does not come solely to the just, nor bad fortune to the unjust. When the weather is good for crops, it is also good for weeds."

-Theodore Roosevelt

by Blake Jensen on Mar 2, 2010 3:14 PM PST reply actions  

Williams fits as a nose tackle and nose tackle is in demand, Odrick may very well be better, and I don't know about Price

I wouldn’t put too much stock into draft experts. The draft is reasonably precise, but the groupthink mocks that have inundated the internet are not an accurate representation of what teams actually think.

by John Morgan on Mar 2, 2010 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

John may have said the same thing before he did the play-by-plays.

Most of the people who put Price above Houston probably have not broken down his film to the extent John has.

John, you have “are” instead of “our” in there at the beginning. I wasn’t looking for errors it just jumped out at me.

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 2, 2010 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks. And fixed

I’m not touchy about correction.

by John Morgan on Mar 2, 2010 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Typos can really undermine a writer

If I’m reading something and I encounter too many typos, I usually stop reading.

by John Morgan on Mar 2, 2010 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that's true

But there are some people who delight in correcting others, and do so from a place of superiority, rather than friendliness. I can be ruthless if I am specifically asked to edit something, but I’m wary of giving unasked for edits, at the risk of sounding like that person.

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 2, 2010 6:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Luckily he's thick-skinned about it.

Which is good, because I can certainly be a pain in the ass. Comes with the territory, I suppose.

by thebyron on Mar 3, 2010 2:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I was eating lunch with my dad today at Applebee's.

While we were talking, I couldn’t help but notice the TV was on ESPN behind my dad, with sports guys talking about the draft. What jumped out to me? That they used the tape to prove their point. Each guy had a notion of what kind of player the player in question was (Berry in this case) and what his skill sets were. They then showed 1 play to reinforce this idea from some random game. It wasn’t bad per se, just incomplete. Meanwhile, we’ve got JM watching a game play by play, through an entire game, charting the moves, strengths, weaknesses, and future potential of players. A complete analysis. Over the course of just a couple days. No point to make, no stance you are trying to defend. Just what a player has, and how that could translate to the NFL (or not).

So thank you John, for giving me what ESPN refuses or cannot do. For free.

(sorry if this was a little OT, but it was this write up that I was reminded of, as well as the Price one).

Now with more lemon bars!

by Fear on Mar 2, 2010 3:21 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Thank you

Hopefully, as of the 16th, I can start doing a full game a day.

by John Morgan on Mar 2, 2010 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting side note before I get back to business.

I watched this game twice before sitting down and breaking it down play by play. I don’t know the process other analysts use, but it often seems like they watch a game and then create an impression from the whole. I think that’s very dangerous. It tends to highlight memorable plays, high leverage situations, and marginalize the greater sample. The reason I do this is not because it’s particularly entertaining or popular. I know that people prefer quick-fire encapsulations of “pass rush” and “coverage” you’re likely to see at other sites, but this is the only method I’ve found that actually works. It’s how I do the Seahawks and so it’s how I do prospective Seahawks. “Tape” is approaching buzzword status, but there’s nothing exclusive or special about tape, the BCS title was available to everyone. What matters is the method.

by John Morgan on Mar 2, 2010 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey John, I don't mean to be a d*ck, but...
We are both are best and our worst.

Was that done on purpose?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Mar 2, 2010 4:10 PM PST reply actions  

When's 'Talk Like a Pirate Day'?

And can we get an entire, very serious article, written entirely in said dialect?

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 2, 2010 6:13 PM PST up reply actions  

D' Yar it be September 19th

I’ve spent that day teaching like a Pirate, where cheating is allowed and answers may only be given in Pirate dialect.

Give me an offensive line or give me death!

by Generzal Zod on Mar 2, 2010 7:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Now that I see you are sold on Houston...

I’m curious what you think about Odrick. He’s been getting a lot of good press. I want to know the real deal on him. Are you planning on covering him? If not a reply would do fine.

I’m really interested in a DT that stands out as a pass-rusher. It sounds like Houston can be that guy, but his first-step/quickness off the ball sounds to still be a concern. How much of a concern? He can be coached up as far as timing, but that’s not all we’re talking about, is it?

by Misfit74 on Mar 2, 2010 4:45 PM PST reply actions  

Thanks.

I didn’t realize Odrick was 6-5. Does seem to make more sense as a 3-4 end.

by Misfit74 on Mar 2, 2010 6:51 PM PST up reply actions  

So, of the three

I appreciate Alualu’s technique, but I would rather have Hew Stun. My desire for him at 40 would be suppressed if we didn’t get a RB at 6 or 14 (depending which RBs are on the board, of course), but I think getting a later round RB would be better than getting a later round DT. Assuming the Hawks are even looking at DT.

John, have you decided if you’re going to keep doing DTs, or were you thinking of starting in on another position? I have no preference either way, I just enjoy this type of series.

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 2, 2010 6:20 PM PST reply actions  

Looking over the combine numbers...

Does the fact that Price benched 225 34 times (Suh did 32) affect your take that he may have trouble translating his bull-rush to the pros?

by Hawkhammer19 on Mar 2, 2010 6:54 PM PST reply actions  

His bull rush translating was not the problem

Though I am not convinced [pectorals + biceps = bull rush]. He shows little awareness, has no pass-rush repertoire, middling lateral motility, not a whole lot of pursuit speed, and tends to quit on plays. Really, he just has a good bull rush, and a great first step.

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 2, 2010 7:08 PM PST up reply actions  

But if his bull-rush is really THAT good...

Perhaps weighing in at 303 is the more encouraging indicator.

He also ran a very respectable 5.13 40.

by Hawkhammer19 on Mar 2, 2010 7:19 PM PST up reply actions  

True, it is encouraging

But I think the problem is that one would have to coach and develop all those skills he is lacking. And can you coach someone who is low motor? Coaching someone up is all well and good, but not when that someone is a #6, #14, or #40 pick in a deep ass position. The Stun Gun on the other hand has a decent repertoire, a high motor, and seems to have a higher ceiling.

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 2, 2010 7:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh I agree that Houston is better.

I was just thinking if he was gone but Price was still available.

by Hawkhammer19 on Mar 2, 2010 7:37 PM PST up reply actions  

John,

I’m not a regular commenter here, so I apologize if this is a stupid question and/or common knowledge. In any case, who’s your first choice for the Hawks first rounder?

by .Taylor on Mar 2, 2010 9:46 PM PST reply actions  

Right now, I would say Clausen

But if another top talent were to fall, I might suggest them and then hope Seattle maneuvers back and drafts Clausen. I’ve taken extensive notes for three games on Clausen, and though I’m not enamored with him, he could be a great quarterback.

by John Morgan on Mar 3, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind Alualu

but that is because I would like to be able to use 6, 14, 40 on the offense, and try to help the defense in free agency and later rounds.

Give me an offensive line or give me death!

by Generzal Zod on Mar 3, 2010 6:54 AM PST reply actions  

no- just thinking I would rather invest 6, 14, and 40 on the offense

and then try to trade up for a decent DT in the 2nd or 3rd.

Give me an offensive line or give me death!

by Generzal Zod on Mar 3, 2010 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I am starting offensive tackles next.

Tentative schedule: Brown, Williams and Capers.

by John Morgan on Mar 3, 2010 12:15 PM PST reply actions  

I'd be interested in Bulaga and Davis too

Not that you aren’t busy or anything. Davis maybe taking a plunge because of work ethic and I have no idea what to think about Bulaga.

Give me an offensive line or give me death!

by Generzal Zod on Mar 3, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Not that I'm advocating it

But doesn’t Bruce Campbell seem like a Gibbs-ish pick? Light, lean, athletic, fast?

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 3, 2010 12:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I am very wary of Campbell, honestly.

In type, he fits, and maybe Gibbs thinks he can mold him into something good, but his profile of toolsy underachiever is a huge red flag for me.

by John Morgan on Mar 3, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I really like Brown

Lord, forgive me for my transgressions, as well as rosterbation.

by Blake Jensen on Mar 3, 2010 1:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I hadn't thought of that.

I think he’ll go in the first round, but he seems more like a project to me than ready-made LT.

by DJ C-Raig on Mar 3, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

I really gotta go over footage of Gerald McCoy

But my initial impression tells me he’s a phenomenal athlete. Could he fall to #6? Mebane could move back to 1 tech and We’d have a pass rushing and run stuffing presence in the middle. I hear he’s got a sub 4.5 40. Does that mean he could drop into a shallow zone too?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Mar 4, 2010 6:33 PM PST reply actions  

His combine 40 time was 4.96, 5th among DTs

The fastest was 4.70 by Earl Mitchell from Arizona….sub-4.5 would be nuts for a DT.

by thebyron on Mar 5, 2010 9:11 AM PST up reply actions  

rumors

teh travel fast

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Mar 5, 2010 10:04 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_2011-10-14_at_23
Jim Harbaugh Vs. Pete Carroll
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill