On sports radio on Monday — I forget who — told of speaking with Carroll & Schneider at the combine and Carroll saying they really need to get 2 more years out of Hasselbeck. Of course any mention of Hasselbeck will bring lip service, and it may or may not be genuine in spite of that, but as it was described, it was fairly unsolicited.

And that’s what this reads like to me. McNabb and Suh would make the Rams look better in 2010, and that will keep Spags employed.

It’s the smart thing to do. Not to mention getting value before it’s too late. It would be a smart thing for Seattle to do too had they ever bothered to look for Matt’s replacement.

We’d have to suck hard, and everyone else to not suck as hard.

What makes everyone assume we’ll be in a better position next year? The Locker talk gets a little old, like it would be in the bad for next year. I don’t think we’ll have a shot at him unless we trade a good portion of our draft. Sanchez went 5th last year. Sanchez.

Of course, there’s always the possibility Locker tanks next year and we can get him in the 6th round.