Golden Tate and the New Possession Receiver
Dana Scully, all hips and shoulder pads, was a mid-nineties sex symbol. The helmet of red hair. The professional demeanor, veneer of strength, pant suits and eventual need for rescue. Scully, Mulder, The X-Files, were wholly and inseparably of their time. The writing was often poor. The special effects campy and small feeling. But the actors, the subject, the universe of The X-Files belonged in the nineties, belonged to the citizens of the nineties and thrived for over 200 episodes before petering out in 2002.
Any team can make three picks in the first two rounds and consider their draft a success. The talent is out there. What made Seattle's first three picks so special is that Russell Okung, Earl Thomas and Golden Tate each in their way perfectly match the modern game. Okung is a gifted pass blocker and that is the true test of a modern left tackle. Levi Brown was selected fourth overall by the Cardinals, but is an atavistic type of offensive tackle: The slow mauler. Thomas is as much corner as safety. Taylor Mays possesses better tools, but is as much linebacker as safety. He's misfit for the modern game and must be worked around.
Golden Tate is as much running back as receiver. He is the receiver of now. He has moves and power and can consistently break the first tackle. Tate may not be the old prototype, all speed, route running and hands, but suited as perfectly as he is to the modern NFL, he might just become the new prototype.
(Notre Dame burns a drive attempting a half-assed Wildcat. Tate can barely receive from shotgun before Panthers are streaming into the Irish backfield. After two rushes for a loss, Charlie Weis is forced to revert to a normal offense.)
1. 1st and 10 at ND 13 Golden Tate rush for a loss of 3 yards to the NDame 10.
2. 2nd and 13 at ND 10 Theo Riddick rush for a loss of 3 yards to the NDame 7.
3. 3rd and 16 at ND 7 Jimmy Clausen pass complete to Armando Allen Jr for 10 yards to the NDame 17.
Left slot, runs deep, does not factor. Clausen outlets underneath to avoid pressure.
(Punt)
(We learn that Bill Stull's parents have fled the stands because Pittsburgh fans boo Bill Stull.)
1. 1st and 10 at ND 10 Jimmy Clausen pass complete to Theo Riddick for 5 yards to the NDame 15.
Tate is split wide right. He runs a short square in. It's slow and methodical and though he's wide open, Clausen target Riddick.
2. 2nd and 5 at ND 15 Jimmy Clausen pass complete to Golden Tate for 8 yards to the NDame 23 for a 1ST down.
Corner Ricky Gary is playing off. Tate runs a hitch. Clausen receives the snap and passes towards Tate in the left flat. He step, step, strides, lowers his shoulder and powers through Gary, past the first and onward before being wrestled out after eight.
3. 1st and 10 at ND 23 Jimmy Clausen pass incomplete.
Tate runs a drag with a double move - looks like a lightning bolt. It's not a common route, but Charlie Weis uses it pretty extensively. Difficult route and performed capably if not John Carlson by Tate. He flashes free, but Clausen is harassed into an outlet underneath. The pass is perfect: Receiver open, targeting the hands, led towards daylight, and dropped.
4. 2nd and 10 at ND 23 Jimmy Clausen pass intercepted by Jarred Holley at the Pitt 30, returned for no gain to the Pitt 30.
The other side of Jimmy Clausen. Tate runs a short route but is never targeted. Clausen heaves a terrible, just horrendous, not even high school, deep ball and it hangs and hangs and allows stifling double coverage to swallow the Irish receiver. Easy interception. Terrible play call executed to terrible perfection.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Clausen's deep balls
Clausen heaves a terrible, just horrendous, not even high school, deep ball and it hangs and hangs and allows stifling double coverage to swallow the Irish receiver.
Lather, rinse, repeat. Good gawd, those things are atrocious. When I hear people claim that Clausen can make all the throws, I have absolutely no clue what they’re smoking.
True
I loved Jimmy, but he did not throw a very good deep ball. It went far, but it also went very high.
Post foot injury he was pretty much shot putting it.
Or “putting” it, to use the more accurate and less intelligible phrasing. He showed much better arm strength as a sophomore.
Toe injury did seem to really hurt his deep ball
Pretty much all arm without being able to follow through. Even more impressive when you consider this. Add last years decision making with the year before’s arm, and you’ve got a hell of a QB. God I hope we don’t regret getting him.
by B.B.Finnegan on Apr 29, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Not often I have to look up a word
Atavistic, good one.
Me too!
Talents that I covet:
Ndamukong Suh, Gerald McCoy, Sam Bradford, Mike Iupati, Golden Tate, Earl Thomas, and Freddie Barnes
by Carl Shinyama on Apr 29, 2010 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions
So is the fast breaking power forward no longer en vouge?
Moss, TO, Gates…etc….are they a thing of the past?
Hybrid players can change the game, but dumping it off to a runner in space or in the flat doesn’t seem to be anything new.
If he’s as good as Wes Welker we’ll be lucky.
Wes Welker catches seemingly everything
I have my doubts Tate will have as good of hands. Be sweet if he did.
Tate has watermelons at the ends of his arm compared to Welker's hands.
If Tate can improve his hands, I’ll be even , more excited about him. And you are right, Welker does catch everything. He also has an accurate QB and rarely catches it far from that QB. I think Tate’s game may be more akin to Anquan Boldin. Well, except that Boldin has good hands. Tate’s hands to concern me but I have to see more.
Early prospect watch: RB Mark Ingram, QB Jake Locker
I think one trend that' gaining steam is what I would call the 'Fitz-clone'.
Many WRs and teams are building offenses with bigger receivers and there were a bunch of larger WRs drafted this year, too. LaFell, Decker, Easley, Mitchell, Bryant, Thomas. In SD you have V.Jackson and Floyd. TB is building w/ Mike WIlliams and Arrelious Benn. There are fewer and fewer smaller, fast WRs than before. I hope Tate is physical enough to make it at one of the outside WR positions, but right now he looks like a slot-receiver. I hope we utilize him well.
Early prospect watch: RB Mark Ingram, QB Jake Locker
I think Bates really wants both types.
Between Housh and the Williams duo, plus Carlson if he lines up wide in the 2 TE sets, hopefully someone will step up to fill the Tall WR requirement, and Tate will be the small fast guy. In an interview on the Kevin Calabro show, Tate compared his game to Percy Harvin (5-11 184 lbs), we just need someone to to be Sidney Rice accross from him.
Or I guess even more fitting would be we need someone to step up to play Brandon Marshall to his Eddie Royal (5-10 180lbs). Eddie didn’t do a lot last year under Daniels, but in his rookie year with Bates as the play caller, he was a big time game changer.
I’m really looking forward to when John breaks down some 2008 Broncos footage so we can get an idea of how Tate is going to be used in Bates’ offense. The only game I remember watching was the opening Monday night game against Oakland when Royal dominated in his first game ever, while Darrell Jackson watched him from the sideline.
by Mind of no mind on Apr 29, 2010 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
That's right-- Royal was incredible that year...
I didn’t realize Bates was the OC then. Good for us.
He wasn't officially the OC.
He was the QB coach and called the plays in 2008. But he’s going to install the same offense. He said at one point that at USC that they were running USC’s offense, and next year we’ll be running his offense. Here’s where I’m getting it from;
The whole of the parts that have shaped Bates’ life will look a lot like the Denver Broncos’ offense when the Seahawks hit the practice field for their first minicamp in early April.
"That’s real accurate," Bates said. "We’re keeping the same terminology as Denver. We’re going to run the zone (blocking scheme). At the same time, we’re going to throw the ball. It’s going to be a fun season."
by Mind of no mind on Apr 30, 2010 2:20 AM PDT up reply actions
I am not an expert on Tate nor am I completely sold that he will be a good player for the Hawks. That said why is everyone saying he has bad hands?
The only evidence I have seen of him having poor hands was the Combine drill where they run sideline to sideline in a straight line while catching multiple balls. He dropped a few and let a few others get in to his body a bit.
The guy got drafted into the MLB as well as the NFL. He played centerfield at Notre Dame. In my experience baseball players have superior hand eye coordination of all the major pro sports. The catches he made in college demonstrated excellent tracking of deep balls and the ability to catch in traffic going across the middle while taking a hit.
I have doubts about Golden Tate.
I have no doubts about his hands.
Rewatch the tape and concentrate on where he is catching the ball
When he was at ND he caught the ball on his pads. His hands weren’t out away from his body, catching it and pulling it in. He did a lot more trapping the ball against his body. The problem that he is going to have, if he doesn’t correct it, is that in the short passing game in the NFL, the windows where he is open will be smaller. Defenses are smarter and faster, which forces the QB to time out the throws underneath much better than in college. Putting more stink on the ball is part of it. It will be increasingly difficult to catch the ball on your body if you are getting it cannoned underneath, because thats what the QB will do to get it to you.
Its a correctable skill, but it is something to watch through pre-season.

by 

































