McNabb Traded to Redskins

Trade Info

Was for 2nd round pick in 2010, and a 3rd or 4th conditional pick in 2011

by MasinMud on Apr 4, 2010 5:39 PM PDT reply actions

More...

According to ESPN.Com Rumors, Trade talks also included Redskins possibly sending Albert Haynsworth, Or Laron Laury (sp?) But Eagles denied

by MasinMud on Apr 5, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions

I really don't like the Skins

But man would I love seeing McNabb succeed. So would everyone, I think, ’cept maybe Iggle fans.

That locks in the Skins for the top OT available?

by Thomas Beekers on Apr 4, 2010 5:48 PM PDT reply actions

Wow, trading your starting QB to a divisional rival.

Ballsy.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

The Arizona Cardinals' plan for success:
-Lose all talent on team to retirement and free agency.
-Call it a day.

by Wayward Llama on Apr 4, 2010 5:53 PM PDT reply actions

So.. Jimmy Clausen?

Anybody? him or Bradford’s going to be there, unless theres some trade to jump us

by somepnoy9189 on Apr 4, 2010 6:11 PM PDT reply actions

Wonder if Jason Campbell becomes a possibility now...

"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin

by dcrockett17 on Apr 4, 2010 6:20 PM PDT reply actions

Not necessarily for us. I just wonder if Washington will move him.

"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin

by dcrockett17 on Apr 4, 2010 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions

I'm going to say 60% Trent Williams, 40% Bulaga.

In terms of who they draft now.

by DJ C-Raig on Apr 4, 2010 6:28 PM PDT reply actions

Okung?

by Nate Dogg on Apr 4, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions

I sort of think Detroit will take him

But if they don’t…Then I don’t know. Fine, you got me, I forgot him alright!?

by DJ C-Raig on Apr 4, 2010 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions

I kind of think that the Okung to Detroit stuff is an ego thing with the mock drafters.

It’s definitely possible but it’s my understanding that Schwartz runs a pretty traditional Tampa 2 and Suh would be way too good to pass up.

by Nate Dogg on Apr 4, 2010 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions

You're probably right

And I wouldn’t be for taking him over Suh, but them falling into the “passing on superior talent for ‘bigger need’” trap seems more likely than possible to me.

by DJ C-Raig on Apr 4, 2010 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions

Wow

Phiadelphia now has the following picks: 24, 37, 55, 70, 87, 105, 121, 137, 200, 243, 244.

That would be fun.

by DJ C-Raig on Apr 4, 2010 6:32 PM PDT reply actions

But we have one of their fourth round picks!

So ha!

A Mariners fan in Seattle

by Coach Owens on Apr 4, 2010 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions

Seven picks in first four rounds

Drool.

inside of a dog it's too dark to read.

by shams on Apr 4, 2010 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions

I'd rather have our picks...

5 in the first 4 rounds plus Detroits high 5th, and two in the top 14 overall.

But Philly must be disappointed they didn’t get much more than SD got for 3rd stringer Whitehurst.

vs. #40, Philly gets a 4th next year (maybe a 3rd if McNabb has a great injury-free season), while we gave SD a straight 3rd no matter what. Yes, we did get the #60 back, but the value is pretty close.

When evaluating a trade, you really have to look at what the best thing each team got.
Philly got the #37 pick
Washington got McNabb
San Diego got the #40 pick
Seattle got Whitehurst

by Kryten on Apr 6, 2010 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions