2009 Season Retrospective: Red Bryant
Red Bryant
2008
Highlights
Raye then attacked Seattle's center, but this time Seattle stopped him. Red Bryant gave David Baas a hard push off the snap and Baas recoiled clear into Norris. Frank Gore adjusted, but the disruption made the route too long to the hole and unblocked Cory Redding closed from the left and tackled Gore after a gain of one.
...
- Second play: Red Bryant stuffs the line and Curry wraps around left end to finish a staggering Frank Gore.
- Seattle puts in its double over tackle package and Bryant's presence allows Cole to isolate left guard David Baas. Cole bullies Baas into the pocket and tips Shaun Hill's pass.
Bears at Seahawks
Lovie Smith's Garrett Wolfe package worked as well as one would expect a Garrett Wolfe package to work. Seattle forced a quick three and out punctuated by Red Bryant exploding into the backfield and tackling Wolfe for a loss. Seahawks ball.
Seahawks at Cowboys
Seattle overloads the right and Curry comes free around right end forcing Tony Romo up into the pocket. Seattle struggled with getting edge rush but failing to establish interior pressure, but this time Red Bryant plows through the right guard and forces an incomplete pass. Babineaux can be seen covering Jason Witten streaking up the right hash mark. However Seattle did it, the Seahawks shut down Witten.
Lowlights
Seahawks at 49ers
- San Francisco drove 60 yards on it opening drive. The mechanics of how have all the excitement and complexity of a bull pushing around a stag. Seattle was badly overmatched at the point of attack. It wasn't Craig Terrill. It wasn't only Cole, Red Bryant was bad too. But it was mostly Seattle's newest free agent journeyman turned starter. As much as I love and praise Brandon Mebane, a team's interior run defense should not fall apart minus one man.
- Bryant showed an interesting mix of good physicality and poor gap discipline. On the fourth play of the drive, following a encroachment penalty on Cory Redding, Bryant weathered a double team and got a body on Frank Gore. He was too deep for it to be a good play, but he held long enough to stop the first. San Francisco converted it on the next play. Cole tackled Gore after five yards. It was second and one.
...
- That play was worse than it seemed. The 49ers were gouging Seattle's interior line. Bryant held against the Niners double teams, but dropped his gap, flowed too far offensive left and Gore cutback right for an easy six.
- Bryant did it again on the next play. He attempted a spin but got caught halfway by Chilo Rachel. He was facing the wrong way when Gore blew past him.
...
One Seahawk did his job, and Lawrence Jackson wasn't enough. Jackson was alone on the right, knocking back pulling left guard David Baas, chipping and disrupting fullback Moran Norris and narrowing Gore's hole to a sliver. The linebackers over-pursued and were out of position. Colin Cole was miles in the backfield after completely misreading the play. Red Bryant pursued hard left and abandoned his gap. Putting eight in the box left Seattle's defense thinned out and two dimensional. When Gore exploded out of the hole, he had only Jordan Babineaux to beat. Babineaux took a bad angle, but Gore does this. Give him a clean release into the second level and one to beat and Gore will. Babineaux was "posterized" so to speak, but he bears less blame than all but Deon Grant, Darryl Tapp, Josh Wilson, Ken Lucas and Jackson. The linebackers and line detonated Seattle's rush defense.
Outlook: Most of what I think about Bryant at end is covered below. One fact I haven't addressed but deserves attention: Dropping Bryant out of the defensive tackle rotation strengthens Colin Cole's hold on the starting one-tech and removes one of Seattle's best interior pass rushers. Bryant is not skilled or particularly good, but compared to Cole, Bryant is a pocket-collapsing demon. Week 2 was Bryant's big audition and he flunked out. I cringe when people attempt to apply sample size concepts from baseball to football, but it should be common sense that struggling in one, two or even six games does not damn a promising young player.
I want the kid to succeed. I can squint and pretend and talk myself into Bryant succeeding at end. But for him to truly succeed, it will take creative coaching. It's not inherently bad to play a tackle at end, but if you're going to punt that kind of pass rush for power, presence and run stopping ability, the rush needs to come from somewhere else. The true key to Bryant succeeding at end might be his interaction with Aaron Curry.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So, can we now call Okung "The Singularity"?
by DJ C-Raig on Jun 25, 2010 5:15 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Um... me no get the joke.
And I’ve read Kurzweil. Or at least tried.
A lot of people call black holes singularities
But in reality (if you can call it that, quantum physics is weird stuff), a singularity is something that occurs inside of a black hole. From Wikipedia: “A gravitational singularity or spacetime singularity is a location where the quantities that are used to measure the gravitational field become infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system.” The caption references a black hole, thus the (awesome) nickname.
by Cannonater on Jun 26, 2010 9:22 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Sometimes reality sucks
Bryant is a player I want badly to succeed. So much so that I seek only for the positive in any reporting on him. But that seems to be the course that leads Seattle’s football team to amazing levels of sucktastic. My instinct says to sell now and move on.
I want Bryant to be good. However, as a fan, I want to experience more wins. Thus, if Bryant sucks, I say good riddance. That hurts to say. Good people who play football, I guess, don’t always make good football players.
Prove my instincts wrong, Mr. Bryant. Please, prove them wrong.
It is what it is...
Has Michael Bennett cemented a role on the Bucs?
I’d love to have him fall back into our hands like Forsett did after his stint with the Colts.
I wonder if a 'true key' will be Bryant playing end when we run 34 alignments?
This scenario doesn’t punt a pass-rushing threat, but adds one – presumably a 2nd ‘Leo-type’.
Isn’t it possible Bryant plays 34 end in those situations for us, while LoJack (or someone else) plays the 43 end? It’s at least plausible, to me. Granted, that’s not an easy conclusion given the information we currently have about the defense we will or won’t run. I don’t think Bryant will play a lot of 43 end, regardless. He could be particularly useful in 34 looks, which I think (and hope) will be more common than anticipated. I’m not entirely sure about Bryant’s chances at having success playing 34 end.
Red Bryant: surprise us!
Probably not, but if Pete is known for one thing, it is definately creativity.
I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul - Invictus
I didn't say we are running a 3-4.
I’m talking about 3-4 alignments in addition to our base defense and the possibility that Bryant could see enough snaps in those situations to define his usefulness. I think that 3-4 looks will be a meaningful percentage of total defensive plays. It’s not as black and white as we are or are not running a “3-4”.
Red Bryant: surprise us!
By 3-4 looks, you mean 3 down linemen and 4 standing players
That should be Seattle’s base defense. It doesn’t explain or justify using Bryant at end.
A 3-4 in a classical sense has 3 linemen that control gaps and 4 linebackers that create pressure through various blitzes. That is what Pittsburgh runs and what the early 20th century Patriots ran. Seattle isn’t running a system like that. It could maybe be described as a Dallas style 3-4, with everyone assigned a gap and pressure generated from the front four pass rushers (the three down linemen and the Leo). But if you’ll notice, Dallas generates pressure from all three line spots*. There is no Red Bryant type in the Cowboys’ front three. Seattle doesn’t just have Bryant, it also has Cole, and that means it is relying on pressure from Clemons and Mebane and largely only Clemons and Mebane and that’s reckless.
*You also might notice that where Seattle has Chris Clemons, Dallas has DeMarcus Ware.
by John Morgan on Jun 27, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Hate to be a killjoy
D’you mean the 21st century Pats? And aren’t they still running a gap-control 3-4, albeit with much less pressure?
Eddie Izzard ran 43 marathons in 51 days with 5 weeks of training. What's stopping you?
If we swapped James Harrison (6', 240 pounds) for Clemons (6'2" 242 pounds)
would you feel any differently about the Seahawks pass rush? Or is a front four that has Bryant at DE and Cole at the 1-tech flawed beyond repair?
I am not sure what to expect out of Harrison this season.
But if Seattle had a good, young, healthy pass rusher instead of Clemons, that would make a major difference. But maybe Clemons shows up. Never know.

by 


































