A Brief and Incomplete Evaluation of Russell Okung
Bedlam was not a satisfactory exhibition of Russell Okung's talents. It wasn't Okung, or his quality of competition but the futility and desperation exhibited by the Cowboys offense that made it unsatisfactory. Nevertheless, here's a brief synopsis of my observations.
Okung's game is power. He doesn't maul defenders, to use evocative if ambiguous jargon, Okung brushes them aside. Talent and ability are so varied at the high school level, it's common for one player to casually outrun or overpower or crush an opponent. That obvious separation in ability shrinks with each jump in level. One does not see too many college football players that assuredly and effortlessly overmatch their opponents, but Okung did. He didn't make me reference my scout's handbook of trusty clichés, like "violent hand punch", but where power, especially upper body strength, was concerned, Okung was a clear step above what one expects from even elite prospects. Power is his 100MPH fastball. His 44" vertical.
Add that to his footwork and drop step and you have an exceptional pass-blocking prospect. He will need to push his routine level of intensity up a bit, but you're not likely to see a left tackle prospect with better raw pass-blocking potential than Okung. Unlike another uber-prospect, D'Brickashaw Ferguson, Okung isn't lean and tall and susceptible to shorter speed rushers that can move into his body and bully themselves into the pocket. His body approaches ideal: long arms, broad shoulders and wide hips.
He needs to build up his lower body a bit. This is where concerns about his effective power come in. Okung is comparatively lean in the lower body and he would be served by adding some bulk to his legs and core. Given his frame, he would probably be better playing around 320 than the 307 he weighed in at the Combine. Apart from how this should help him hold ground, it should also help him avoid getting his weight out in front of his feet. Okung is weak when he overextends, and he overextends when he's in space.
Which is the final matter: Okung is not a cut-from-the-cloth zone blocker. His footwork is terrific and he moves very well for an offensive linemen, but he does not fit the lean, quick and agile profile of a prototypical zone blocker. His cut blocking is methodical rather than explosive. He has the power and technique to engage and position a defender, but he is going to miss some blocks and achieve only glancing blows on too many others. His raw power and ability to steer defenders means he fits a traditional power blocking scheme much better than a pure zone scheme, but it's the latter he will play. Washington drafted Trent Williams to fit their zone scheme and though Williams is not the pass blocker Okung is, he is a better fit for the system.
Okung has immense potential and a very high likelihood of reaching it. His best quality is his pass blocking. Okung could be a legendary pass blocker. It's within his reach. I don't think he has the same potential of say Ryan Clady to move into the second and third level on sweeps and screen passes and batter defenders on the move. But then no left tackle short of Walter Jones gives you everything. That Okung has Jones-like potential as a pass blocker, maybe better, is plenty exciting.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff,
I was really worried about Okung before the combine, but I think the length of his arms and his bench press performance helped allay my fears a bit. If anything, he seems like he’s as safe of a prospect as you can get on the o-line. He may not boom to top 5 Left Tackle status, but he probably won’t bust either.
I don't think Okung moves as effortlessly as Walter did in pass pro
He seems more mechanical and less athletic to me.
But he can be outstanding even if he doesn’t end up as good as Walter.
"Not as good as Walter Jones..."
…still leaves a hell of a lot of space below it.
Even when I get worried about his contribution to this and next year's run-game
His pass-blocking potential easily compensates as far as my optimism.
Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...
Ever since the 7 on Krieg @ KC
The Seahawks said: never again! Only all pro HOF potential LT’s. Good evaluation mon!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI
Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!
9
7 was just Derrick Thomas.
Still, my favorite Seahawks game of all time.
Seahawks Fans Cannot Be Cured
The comeback against the Raiders--the one where Joey Galloway kicked a ball in the air...
and it was returned for a touchdown to make it 21-0.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
oops
thaz right. Shame on me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI
Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!
Definitely would rather have an excellent pass blocker then run blocker at LT
It’s a passing league, at that position it’s a necessary. Plus, there’s a name for the not so great pass blocking tackles that are good at run blocking, they’re called guards.
My favorite line...
Okung has immense potential and a very high likelihood of reaching it.
The path to being a way above average LT within 3 seasons is pretty easy to see with this guy. The path to busthood (the didn’t-play-well kind) is less easy to see. He’s not a natural in the ZBS, but his floor seems to be “adequate zone blocker” rather than “he’s playing like Betty White out there.”
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
The question is when he reaches it.
Clady, Thomas and Oher are probably the top three LTs in recent years. All had good to great rookie campaigns. I’m just saying.
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
Speaking of lines...
"he’s playing like Betty White out there."
Please keep Shaun Alexander (post Superbowl) out of this thread.
And while we are on a tangent, how about Betty’s hosting of Saturday Night Live — most people are dead by 88 and she is more hip than most of America half her age.
by IslandHawk on Jun 3, 2010 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Still pissed I went to bed right before that figuring it'd be completely lame
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
So that makes an interesting dilemma.
I use “dilemma” loosely; it’s a good problem to have, and not a significant thing, but Gibbs wants his guys to beunder 310. I’ve recognized that he can get overextended, and it makes complete sense, now, that he’s more stacked on top than down below.
So will the Seahawks get him to bulk up his lower body? And approach 320? We know that Gibbs isn’t rigid with his prototype, but he does have one, and we’ve already modestly deviated from it.
It would seem only logical to say, he can overextend, of course he needs more lower weight, damn the prototype. But the value in less weight is in the demands of the position. It’s not just different because they block space, the cuts and the blocks in the 2nd level are integral parts of the running plays. To an extent, the impact the dozen pounds or more has is contingent on who he’ll be called on to block, and the creases the back decides to take as they unfold. Can he get where he should be, fast enough to make a difference, not too slow that the defender can get in on the play?
So which is more valuable, that’s the question. It’s not a huge thing, but it’s one of substance. I don’t know that there is an easy answer, but maybe we will see one if we watch closely.
by jacobstevens on Jun 3, 2010 5:01 PM PDT reply actions 4 recs
I rec because it's a
very good question. I’d like to see more rec’ing of smart shit guys!
BTW to address the dilemma; I say: more bulk. I agree with ol’ B.B. Finnegan up there; I’ll take a decrease in run advantage for an increase in pass advantage in this league today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI
Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!
Well made point.
When you put it that way, in the macro, between running and passing, I have to agree.
by jacobstevens on Jun 4, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
BTW You all probably know this;
but Sando linked this article on his blog. Cheers. It’s Friday!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI
Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by 





























