Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Todd Haley Is The Steelers Next Offensive Coordinator

2009 Season Retrospective: Deion Branch

XFINITY from Comcast is a proud supporter of Field Gulls.  You’ll get your Seahawks games as a part of over 120 NFL games XFINITY provides in HD, as well as On Demand game recaps from every NFL game every week, faster Internet speeds, and stunning HD.  With XFINITY and NFL RedZone, you get every touchdown from every game every Sunday afternoon!  Call 1-800-XFINITY or visit http://www.xfinity.com.

Deion Branch

2007

2008

Highlights

Seahawks at Colts

In back-to-back plays, Stockton and Davis misguided fans to false conclusions. The first was forgivable, but frustrating. Deion Branch made an incredible move to beat Tim Jennings' press and slide into the right flat for an easy 22 yard reception. The move was sick. The pass was a little too high to a wide-open man, but, all in all, not noteworthy. Davis, a former defensive back, did not credit Branch for discarding Jennings to get wide open. Davis did not criticize Jennings for taking too long looking in the backfield after he was beat. He credited Wallace for his throw. Every NFL quarterback could and should routinely make that throw.

...

The drive ended on a beautiful pass and an equally beautiful catch by Deion Branch. Branch ran a skinny post and jumped and turned just as the pass hit him in the numbers. It was basic football decided by talent and execution. The style that defines the Colts offense; a style Knapp may have abandoned after years of JaMarcus Russell and Michael Vick.

49ers at Seahawks

Unger controlled his man on another nice looking deep route by Deion Branch, but the pass sailed nowhere and luckily to no one.

...

Hasselbeck isn't there. Quarterbacks do not fall like running backs fall. Losing a little arm strength is not like losing the first gear that got you the job. Hasselbeck can toss a nice pass when he needs. The bender over the defender to Deion Branch was an indefensible pass at its best. He threw another high-arcing bomb to Branch that Branch lost behind the defender. It was pretty for a second. Real pretty.

Lowlights

Star-divide

Seahawks at Bears

38. Deion Branch was playing the Deon Butler role.

37. That role: Run deep and never get targeted.

Seahawks at Colts

5. 2-14-IND 47 (2:25) (Shotgun) 15-S.Wallace pass short right to 83-D.Branch to 50 for -3 yards (33-M.Bullitt)

Willis cut blocks Brock and succeeds. T.J. Houshmandzadeh cut blocks Tim Jennings and succeeds. Deion Branch missed that. He cuts across field and attempts a play Barry Sanders couldn't make in college and predictably is dropped behind the line of scrimmage. Had he trusted Housh, the too aggressive Jennings left a column of space up the right sideline.

Seahawks at Cowboys

Matt Hasselbeck sold play-action well but showed off his square wheels attempting to roll out. He was barely through his curve before he had to target Deion Branch because of pressure. The pass had all the mustard of a Coney Island sand crab. Branch dropped it before being blown up.

Seahawks at Texans

And was sacked. T.J. Houshmandzadeh was in the left slot and initiated contact off the snap. He drove his defender back and got him to bite on the route. He wasn't close to open. Deion Branch was on the right. He ran a "go" route that was supposed to draw the safety but didn't. Hasselbeck saw that and optioned out of the screen. And was sacked.

Outlook: I am as surprised as anyone that Branch still commands a roster spot. It says a lot about Seattle's wide but shallow collection of wide receivers. It says a lot about the power of talent to seduce, and Branch is still among Seattle's most talented wide receivers. It says a lot about how badly Branch was misused last season. It says a lot about the difference between excelling in practice and excelling on the gridiron. It says a lot about a lot of things, but don't listen too terribly much, because it would shock me if this story continues into the fall.

Branch is just too expensive and has too lengthy an injury history for the Seahawks not to embrace a chance to cut him and avoid the salary cap hit. I know Seattle's shadow budget is among the largest in the league, and despite throwing money at free agents for years, Tim Ruskell never seemed handcuffed on who he could sign, but it would take a dazzling rebound both from a career nadir and endless injuries for Branch to make any sort of sense for Seattle. And it still might not make sense to retain him.

To depart from the cold and calculating world of roster construction and the salary cap for a second, I do not think Branch is as bad as he looked last season. The money quote:

38. Deion Branch was playing the Deon Butler role.

37. That role: Run deep and never get targeted.

Both Branch and Butler were pawns in the Greg Knapp offense. Both Branch and Butler were powerless to squeeze production out of a terribly conceived deep passing attack. Maybe if Matt Hasselbeck was healthy and a different quarterback, or if Branch and Butler were big-bodied bullies that could stretch and command space instead of having to be hit in stride, or maybe maybe maybe but no no no, because what a fucking mess. I do not think Knapp deserves the flak some Seahawks fans shoot his way, but his insistence on throwing deep despite consistent and predictable failure just blows my mind.

Though Butler and Branch are not the same profile, they do face the same problem: How to be a quality short and middle threat when your coach does not trust you to take a pounding over the middle? Butler is slight and Branch a little less slight but 9/4th bionic or cadaver. Butler probably deserves a shot if only to see if he's capable.

Branch may survive into the preseason and push the kids but I would be shocked if he made the roster. I know Carroll is committed to starting the best players and a healthy Branch qualifies, but there is only so much one can mortgage the future for the present. If Pete needs a lesson in that, he might want to ask Ruskell about a trade he made some four years ago.

XFINITY from Comcast is a proud supporter of Field Gulls. You’ll get your Seahawks games as a part of over 120 NFL games XFINITY provides in HD, as well as On Demand game recaps from every NFL game every week, faster Internet speeds, and stunning HD. With XFINITY and NFL RedZone, you get every touchdown from every game every Sunday afternoon! Call 1-800-XFINITY or visit http://www.xfinity.com.

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

And yet, we have the Carroll comments on Branch.

Are they genuine? Are they significant even if genuine? Tremendous article among tremendous articles, John.

Sublime caption among sublime captions.

by jacobstevens on Jul 9, 2010 3:05 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Maybe his style of play lends itself to better performance in OTAs than in August?

Or the regular season?

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jul 9, 2010 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thought it was right after the first session or two.

Ugh not FACT check time…. Being accurate is so annoying.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jul 10, 2010 1:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

What's the likely starting lineup w/o Branch?

Does Tate become the number 2? Mike Williams?

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Jul 9, 2010 3:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Butler?

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jul 10, 2010 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Someone who has been out of football for two years?

I think we might be buying into the camp stories too much. Let’s wait and see. It’s not impossible, but it seems unlikely.

by Thomas Beekers on Jul 10, 2010 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

And taller than the rest of the receiving corps on each others shoulders

in a precarious tower. Why must they all be so small?!

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jul 10, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just a guess

Not a lot to back it up. He has the body type and pedigree to make it work though.

by stufr on Jul 12, 2010 7:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

He is the most talented player we have at a specific position that this offense wants to have.

Kind of like how we’re going to have a Leo position, regardless of the talent available for it, we are probably going to have a WR of his body type on the field, and he is the most likely to be that player.

I have some decent fantasy expectations from him.

by cashless on Jul 12, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cut bait and ruuuuun

Shoulda happened a while ago.

Should be interesting to watch out WRs. Pick your #2 out of a pool of unproven, rookie or out-of-football-for-2-years. Delicious.

by Thomas Beekers on Jul 10, 2010 5:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Even better than last year.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Jul 10, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good stuff, John.

I’d be interested in your thoughts on Branch’s performance in the Tampa Bay game (i.e., “Elbert Mack’s 15 minutes of fame”), when Branch seemed either unable or unwilling to fight for balls in his vicinity. That just blew me away.

by Doug Farrar on Jul 10, 2010 8:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Would anyone be bothered if we cut Branch before camp

I don’t see it being possible to get anything out of him. He will only take up snaps.
He has no trade value.

by stufr on Jul 12, 2010 7:11 AM PDT reply actions  

I would. What do you gain by cutting him?

He’s not an entrenched veteran that will steal playing time from the younger, more deserving receivers that the Hawks don’t have. And if he’s healthy he’s got decent starter potential. Theres really no reason to look at Branch any differently than you look at Mike Williams, you just have to ignore the sunk cost.

by Nate Dogg on Jul 12, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

You are correct

I guess it is some bad taste that taints my opinion

by stufr on Jul 12, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think Branch and Williams couldn't be more different.

Branch is a fragile aging veteran that has never lived up to his contract or trade value.

Williams is a big, tall, young WR who was drafted high in the first and had trouble making the initial adjustment to the NFL.

Branch has had to sit out several OTAs, where as Williams has done nothing but make plays.

Yeah, I’d say they were different.

by Hawksince77 on Jul 12, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

You forgot another way they're different.

Branch has actually succeeded in the NFL, and on this team, while Williams never has. They’re different types of projects, absolutely, but they’re both projects.

by Nate Dogg on Jul 12, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

His first two seasons were successful.

And he’s been sporadically successful since then.

by Nate Dogg on Jul 12, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

1st season, maybe

But he only played in 11 games the second season. It would have probably been his most successful, but he missed a third of it. Thats the part of him I don’t even want to mess with.

by stufr on Jul 13, 2010 4:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I would.

I’ve wanted him but, before. Earlier in the offseason, if Carroll evaluated the team, added to the corps in Tate & Williams, and his judgment was Branch won’t contribute, OK.

Now, when there’s nothing to gain, it would bother me. I don’t think Branch will do anything significant for us this year. I don’t. I know that he can, though. I’d rather be certain. That his knees keep him from cutting effectively, that the speed is gone, or something else. Not as a person, but as a contract I hate that Deion Branch has played for the Seahawks. I hate how it’s all turned out. But I’d rather be certain that he won’t contribute, before cutting him, at this current point in time.

by jacobstevens on Jul 12, 2010 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

It wouldn't bother me.

I would rather see Butler and Tate (in that order) get the practice reps and the field experience.

by Hawksince77 on Jul 12, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I totally agree.

This is not Holmgren’s team, this is the competition at every position team.

by cashless on Jul 12, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its not a matter of preferential treatment

Do you see him as a part of this teams future past this year?
If not then why give him any reps at all? Those reps could be used to develop or debunk new or young talent.

by stufr on Jul 12, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

He has a chance to help the team win this year. Theres no reason to throw that away at this point.

As far as preferential treatment goes, the only way he’s depriving the new or young talent of reps is if he’s getting preferential treatment. He’s going to have to earn his snaps just like everyone else. If he is earning them, great, he’s got a chance to help the team. If he’s not he won’t be stealing time from the youngsters and he’ll soon be cut anyways.

by Nate Dogg on Jul 12, 2010 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"
Halloween_mobster_small
Come on in!
Mail
A Reply to Beekers and Some Comments About Comments

Recent FanPosts

Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad
Beast_mode_tshirt_small
Tats Comeback Attempt?
994_small
Free Agents vs. NFL Draft - Wide Receivers
Small
Where Will the Seahawks' Churn Hit? Defensive Line Edition
Small
Expanding Our Football Knowledge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill