Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

*The Mansfield Wrotto Plan

A team can compensate for a weaker left tackle by adding blockers and thus removing receivers. The left tackle will survive, but through sacrifice.

I dished out some perfunctory praise of Mansfield Wrotto, Jeremy Bates and Alex Gibbs last night. I woke up yesterday morning feeling like someone kicked me in the back. Mothers don't let your kids grow up to be Teamsters. By the end of the game, I was so tired I just wanted to be done with it. Bland, positive and imprecise is a crowd pleaser and suffices when you're not capable of better. Bland, positive and imprecise is right up there with pop culture references, personal anecdotes and hyperbole in the lazy writer's toolbox.

How did Wrotto play? How did Bates and Gibbs hide Wrotto, if they did, and is it a sustainable strategy or a bag of tricks, quickly exhausted? Those questions were on my mind while doing my preliminary review of the tape this morning. Here's an answer, or a beginning of an answer to be explored further through the week.

Bates and Gibbs put Wrotto in a hat, cut a hole in the bottom, put that hat atop a trick pedestal and crammed one or two tight ends on top. Fans only saw success pulled from thin air, but it was success won through misdirection and compensation. Misdirection and compensation likely to generate diminishing returns.

Which is, of course, why players like Wrotto can "man up" for a game even against the fiercest of competition but "get worse by the week" as opponents figure them out.

The first half is the most relevant sample, but I might include the two series Matt Hasselbeck started in the second. Still thinking that over. The first half is the relevant sample because Wrotto squared against Jared Allen. Allen had one tackle and no other statistical impact. Football stats are stupid.

Here is the real story of the first half.

Seattle started the game with two tight ends on the left. And if that wasn't sufficient compensation, Hasselbeck took a three step drop. Seattle had 21 offensive snaps, including the false start by Wrotto and the play called back by a Sean Locklear hold, and 13 of those snaps featured a tight end on the left. Sometimes they chipped. Often they played left tackle, allowing Wrotto to functionally play guard. Always, they came at cost: lost receivers, bad matchups and/or predictability.

The eight plays without a tight end protecting Wrotto were:

Star-divide

1. 2-6-SEA 42 (13:58) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass incomplete short left to 84-T.Houshmandzadeh (51-B.Leber).

Three step drop, pass nearly picked.

2. 2-4-MIN 22 (11:57) 33-L.Washington right guard to MIN 21 for 1 yard (52-C.Greenway).

Run behind right guard on a stretch right.

3. 2-9-SEA 3 (:50) 33-L.Washington right end to SEA 4 for 1 yard (26-A.Winfield).

Run right; Carlson faces Allen; Wrotto's assignment nearly tackles Leon Washington for a safety.

4. 3-8-SEA 4 (:10) 33-L.Washington right guard to SEA 7 for 3 yards (94-P.Williams).

Trips left; T.J. Housmandzadeh motions right; run right.

5. 1-10-SEA 28 (11:39) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass short left to 88-C.Morrah to SEA 33 for 5 yards (51-B.Leber).

Screen pass to Cameron Morrah in the left flat.

6. 1-10-SEA 43 (10:48) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass deep right to 83-D.Branch to MIN 15 for 42 yards (39-H.Abdullah; 26-A.Winfield). WATCH HIGHLIGHT

Play action; seven blockers.

7. 1-10-MIN 15 (10:05) PENALTY on SEA-66-M.Wrotto, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at MIN 15 - No Play.

False start: Wrotto.

8. 3-19-MIN 24 (9:06) 22-J.Jones left end to MIN 20 for 4 yards (31-C.Cook).

Trips left; Housh motions right; pitch left, Wrotto pulls, misses Chris Cook and Cook tackles Jones from behind.

Protecting a weakness makes a team predictable, and in some ways, down a man. John Carlson did a good job given his task, but Carroll, Bates and Seattle want Carlson receiving, not flailing to recover. Opponents would/will eventually recognize patterns, tendencies and resulting weaknesses and shift scheme, assignments and coverage. The Wrotto plan can be reworked but its essence will remain, and teams will catch up faster than Seattle can change.

The Seahawks did well with that they had. The offense was stagnant but cautious and the defense kept the Seahawks in it through the first half. Bates did a good job of keeping the heat off Wrotto. Gibbs did a good job of helping Wrotto execute what was asked of him. Wrotto survived. Seattle survived. Yesterday.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There is hope

But if we want him for the whole season, I hope they wait the extra week or so. Hurrying that kind of injury back is just asking for a repeat.

by stufr on Aug 29, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

And the injury is already of the recurring variety,

what with the news that he played on the same injured ankle for 13 games last year.

I am extremely curious as to the approach Carroll will take with this. Rushing his return, or even applying a traditional timetable for it, could be playing with fire.

by trippsixxes on Aug 29, 2010 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh there's hope, but there's nothing solid to support that.

After all, the official diagnosis went from ankle sprain to high ankle sprain, with no definite time table to his return.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Aug 29, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, the hope remains

But with a high ankle sprain of any magnitude it is difficult to project a return week. Pistol recovered in 2 weeks last year; Locklear recovered in 6.

by ErictheHawksFan on Aug 29, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm interested in a few things, as they relate to this post.

First, how much of this orchestration will carry over into the regular season?

How much did we see real tendencies and how much are false tendencies that relate to the team holding things back or misguiding early season scouting reports?

Simply, I wonder, is how much the team over-protected our QB(s) to prevent pre-season injury vs. the risks that might be taken in the regular season?

Red Bryant: surprise us!

by Misfit74 on Aug 29, 2010 2:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Is this something the Hawks did just because Wrotto was going up against Allen?

I wonder if Wrotto will be left on his own a bit more against Oakland and San fran the next couple weeks.

by MFAN on Aug 29, 2010 2:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Just wanted to say thanks John!

I’ve had to work during every game so far this year, something my former self would have kicked my current self’s ass for, but I digress. Thanks to you and your excellent analysis and highlights, I get to stay ahead of the curve on hawks knowledge and feel like I never missed a game.Thanks a lot and keep up the good work!

by Fightfightfight on Aug 29, 2010 2:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Okung today

Twitter a few hours ago:

Had a great time at City Church in Kirkland today. Thanks to my followers who suggested it. Feel a better week coming on. #givingHimglory

Go 'Hawks.

by JimAK on Aug 29, 2010 3:50 PM PDT reply actions  

This seems to be more about religion than about his health.

Of course, the two have been intertwined for past Seahawks.

by yuniform on Aug 29, 2010 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

On the positive side

once Okung is back at OT, and Wrotto is back at backup OG, we get more than just Okung back. We get John Carlson and plays featuring the TE back! Can’t wait.

"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank

by Stevo's on Aug 29, 2010 7:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Why oh why?

What is the logic of having the TE stay in and try and single block Jared Allen (the TE “playing left tackle” as you put it)? The few times I noticed this, the TE was eaten alive.

Is it simply that you are forcing him to start from further outside? Off the TE’s outside shoulder instead of the LT’s?

I have to believe that in one-on-one pass blocking Wrotto can outperform John Carlson, somewhere around 100% of the time.

by rymong on Aug 29, 2010 9:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I would guess that position and anticipation count for a lot, too

Let’s say that Carlson is covering Wrotto’s left side, and Jared Allen is lined up just outside the tackle. If Allen goes for a bull rush or an inside stunt, then certainly Wrotto is the better option to protect the quarterback.

But it’s crowded inside, and Allen’s best move (I’m guessing) is to come in off the edge— especially if Carlson is supposed to be a receiver on the play. So the strategy is to make Allen think that Carlson is receiver when Carlson is a blocker (and visa versa).

In that case, Carlson’s disadvantage in strength (and almost certainly technique) is partly mitigated by his advantage in speed. More importantly, he’s in a better position to block the outside rush. And he can give up as much ground as he wants, riding Allen 10 or 15 yards into the backfield, so long as he doesn’t give up the angle.

Which brings us back to J.M.’s thesis:

Opponents would/will eventually recognize patterns, tendencies and resulting weaknesses and shift scheme, assignments and coverage.

This being preseason, the pass-rush goals should be (1)to give the individual guys a workout, (2)evaluate bubble players, and (3)practice execution of any stunts or blitzes. The regular-season goal of laying a few hits on the quarterback (to shake him up and make him less effective) is not sensible, because you don’t care about winning and, hopefully, the other team will be more inclined to be gentle as well.

So Allen needed a workout, but certainly not an evaluation. So I’m guessing that Minnesota didn’t try very hard to counteract the Carlson-Wrotto scheme. Had this been a regular-season game, they would have observed the tendency and reacted: Allen would’ve rushed inside and/or the linebacker behind him would have disregarded Carlson as a receiver to contribute somewhere else (blitzing or in coverage).

by Jason_D on Aug 30, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I see the point, and I agree, and I hope it doesn't cost Carlson too much.

But I have to say, I find these consequences very acceptable. The ability to neutralize fierce pass rush, got to be picky to not like that. I may be completely ignorant of the things an opponent can adjust to tear this open, though. But I read this and think, OK, extra bodies. Extra distance to the QB. If they counter that, doesn’t that make them a man short in pass defense?

No, it’s not ideal. I know it’s not static and won’t last. But let’s face it, we could have their tackle (McKinnie) and Jared Allen would still show up in the gameplan in a regular season matchup. Wrotto may always need help, but not every featured pass rusher will demand this kind of attention. I think this is very livable.

by jacobstevens on Aug 29, 2010 10:41 PM PDT reply actions  

They can switch off where the pressure is coming from.

Once they realize how hard we are protecting the OT, they can ignore the TE and come at Matt from the other side. Or do some stunt work to separate the two and eat up Wrotto.

Now with more lemon bars!

by Fear on Aug 29, 2010 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who's to say he won't?

I do believe I saw TE’s in lots of little patterns drifting out into the flat long after they’d normally head out on routes.

It looked to me like there was some serious game-planning going on.

by djafrot on Aug 30, 2010 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, not accounting for Carlson could come back to bite.

If the defense outright ignores him because they think he’s staying in the majority of the time for pass pro, Bates can counter that by just having Carlson chip and then release. Gash the defense a few times that way and they will be forced to honor him.

by Catoblepas on Aug 30, 2010 3:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"

Recent FanPosts

Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad
Beast_mode_tshirt_small
Tats Comeback Attempt?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill