Seahawks August 6 Practice Report: Running Backs and Tight Ends
I will be driving for part of the day, but should have some more stuff, plus links to the local coverage this afternoon.
Thank you Seattle. You are beautiful.
- Would the Justin Forsett of 2009 be enough for Seahawks fans? He was in 2009 form on Friday, showing his ability to catch and redirect, and his ability to power through the first tackle and keep chugging. Some hits that would tackle another rusher, knock Forsett low but do not stop him.
- If Seattle is committed to using its fullback, and count me as doubtful, Owen Schmitt needs to step up big time. He is showing better ability as a pass catcher, flashing a smoother and quicker redirect. It's necessary. As is, Schmitt is a borderline liability as a receiver.
- Good hard pass block by Julius Jones.
- And again.
- And again.
- Leon Washington displayed an open-field sidestep that no other Seahawk rusher is capable of. He caught, turned up field, juked hard left and then continued up field. Weapon.
- Jones saw the hole and exploded up the gut.
- Forsett popped through the hole and smacked hard into Ben Hamilton. Shades of last season.
- He then broke tackles and spun up field, on the final noteworthy play by the backs.
Tight Ends
- Cameron Morrah curled left on a short pattern and then quickly turned up field for run after catch.
- Anthony McCoy dropped an easy reception over the middle.
- He caught a pass that barely skimmed past a defender. It's a tough catch that I've seen plenty of receivers miss. The pass was low and obstructed by the defender, but McCoy focused and pulled it in. Seattle needs to keep four tight ends.
- Chris Baker is slow, very slow, but smooth and a quality athlete. No word yet on his blocking.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"There is nothing so depraved as a man in the depths of an ether binge."
Great caption, John, with an assist from Hunter. Sounds like we may have a most adequate running game by committee. Washington, Forcett & Jones. Stay healthy, lads.
by broadbill birdwatcher on Aug 7, 2010 10:25 AM PDT reply actions
I must have missed that episode.
Little known fact: Fred Dryer was first choice for Sam Malone on Cheers.
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
I keed, I keed.
Still, you’re with me on Dee Dee McCall, right? Women with badges. Yum.
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
:)
It’s rather odd to think that Stepfanie Kramer had so little of a career otherwise.
by The Ancient Mariner on Aug 7, 2010 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Darnit, pic fail.
Not sure why that didn’t work for me.
http://s1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/diggitus/?action=view¤t=Stepfanie20Kramer.jpg"
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
Thank you some more, Mr. Morgan, for fanbased reporting.
Without fear or favor, that hasn’t been dumbed down and shrinkwrapped for my protection.
The runners will have a much better year, as they won’t be trapped in Knapp’s scheme. And I’m all right with Julius in on passing downs. He can pass block, can he run block?
some more thanks for you John
I like hearing anything positive about Leon Washington, if he can heal he’s for real
John's Improving My Scores on the Fan Confidence Poll
Up from “30” to “40.”
In All Seriousness
Mr. Morgan is why I no longer read coverage from the P-I, the Times, or the TNT. It all comes here, anyway, and I get these beautiful analyses to go along with it.
Why?
Carlson are McCoy are two quality targets… do we really need three of those at tight end? I could understand if it was for developmental purposes, but both are young. What with all the problems we’ve had at WR (i.e.: injuries) over the last while, I’d think we’d be more concerned about ensuring depth at that position.
I would likewise rather see us keep only four backs rather than lose a WR or two. Backup backs can be found midseason, but trying to bring in a WR to a new system is pretty tough.
I would definitely advocate having a young WR on the PS for depth.
But with (presumably) Housh, Branch, Tate, Williams, and Butler all seeing snaps, along with the number of other receiving targets available to the team, it doesn’t seem like there will be too many opportunities for said 6th man.
I guess it depends on who excels in the next few weeks. For a backup role, I’d support taking young talent over veterans every time and we seem to have a lot more of that at TE. If one of the young WR’s establishes himself as having a future with the team, then sure, have 6 WR’s.
Since more 2TE sets means more depth is needed for TEs anyway, I’d be comfortable with 5WR’s. Playing our young tight ends more to offset a WR deficiency seems a good developmental move.
I don’t know, maybe I’m way off base here.
Also I’m terrified of our RB position depth because of the fragility/size of our backfield.
WR depth isnt just for pass catchers.....
a few players will also take a roster spot who are special team players ie. Ruvell Martin. The only reason he was brought onto the team was as a special team player. If he makes the team- it will be as a ST player, not a “receiving receiver.”
As for the TE situation, McCoy must stay on the 53 man roster- there is no way he would pass waivers to be placed on the practice squad- a different team would pick him up. With lots of 2TE sets I could see Pete Carroll and company keeping 4 TE’s- otherwise I see Morrah released.

by 
































