Tricks
1-10-SEA 47 (10:09) 20-J.Forsett left guard to SEA 49 for 2 yards (94-J.Smith, 98-P.Haralson).
Seattle runs the pitch left, inside zone right play that Jeremy Bates seems to love. It works. From a scheme standpoint, this run looks ready to break. It doesn't. Though the misdirection draws one outside linebacker wide and freezes both inside linebackers, the run is stopped. It breaks down in two places.
The first is minor: The nose tackle separates from Chris Spencer and flashes free towards Justin Forsett. Spencer is able to recover and drop the defender, but Forsett loses speed by adjusting in the backfield. One can pin that on Spencer for not holding the block or Forsett for overreacting. Either is applicable and neither conclusive.
The second is minor: Tyler Polumbus knocks back but almost instantly loses Justin Smith, and Smith separates and hits Forsett in the hole after two.
Runs can be so fragile.
2-8-SEA 49 (9:35) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass short left to 89-J.Carlson to SF 47 for 4 yards (52-P.Willis).
Matt Hasselbeck does something smart and nearly pays for it.
49ers blitz five. Takeo Spikes attacks Mike Gibson, forces him back, and split-seconds before Hasselbeck targets John Carlson, flashes free and almost blows up the play. Before all that, Hasselbeck pumps towards Mike Williams, recognizes Williams is covered, that he has seven blockers and should have time, pulls down and reads Carlson on the left. Just then, Spikes flashes free.
3-4-SF 47 (8:58) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass short right to 83-D.Branch to SF 44 for 3 yards (52-P.Willis).
Seattle breaks huddle with one on the left and four on the right in a diamond formation. The key is to line up, snap and fire before the 49ers can react, but it doesn't work. Patrick Willis not only reads the play, he gets a running start. No one blows their block. Everything works as planned from the Seahawks perspective, but surprise is not achieved and the play is blown up.
Deion Branch still almost achieves the first.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very many things
went right for the Hawks yesterday, and we are all happy for it.
BUT I think the single biggest thing is this:
38 yards on 17 carries.
Gore’s totals.
I LOVE that and hope we can keep doing it. It set the table for all that followed.
by ChucklehutCynic on Sep 13, 2010 3:05 PM PDT reply actions
That Branch bubble screen will still pay dividends during the year.
Something about the quick break from the huddle, IN the diamond formation as they run over there, kind of broadcast what was going on, I thought. I dunno how else to execute it, tho. I thought it was brilliant to break from the huddle late to set it up. Trips with another guy in the slot is more obvious, isn’t it? He’s going to motion behind them. So, no problems with it, just credit to the 9ers for not being fooled and executing properly.
But it just needs to work once, and it will. Pats ran a similar bubble on the left with Welker, and the Bengals seemed like they didn’t want to be fooled into taking the bait. They called bluff and guessed wrong. With an offense like the Pats, the success and decoy use of the play yins & yangs to make it more effective, and my hope is we will be able to do the same thing with Branch.
Cowboys ran it as well.
I watched 3 games yesterday and saw that play in all three. Welker’s being the most successful.
Teams will be on the lookout for it for awhile after this.
Maybe halfway in we can pull it off again…. is it okay that stuff like this makes me miss the Senecat?
Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...
The Senecat was fine, fun even.
It was the Senesacks that got his ass sent to Cleveland.
by Dizzy Saturn on Sep 14, 2010 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions
You can; I don't.
It always felt so forced. This Wild Cat thing is a buzz, we better do one too.
by jacobstevens on Sep 14, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Well I figured that was Jim Mora's perception of it.
But it was actually a pretty successful package. The nickname and SeaCat picture just rock, anyway.
Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...
Agreed -- it seemed to have a high success ratio for a repeated gadget/trick play
Part of it was I got so incredibly bored with Holmgrem’s play calling, and welcomed anything new in playbook. (Especially when we were likely losing most games anyway, worth a shot).
For those of us old enough to remember the early Patera/Zorn days, losing football is much more fun and entertaining when you have the occasional unexpected wacky play to help tide you over in a losing cause.
Honestly
that bubble screen play works on just about any team without a stud like Patrick Willis. Willis is the only reason it didn’t go for the first, and even then it was close.
by Bildo on Sep 13, 2010 4:14 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Honestly
that bubble screen play works on just about any team without a stud like Patrick Willis. Willis is the only reason it didn’t go for the first, and even then it was close.
by Bildo on Sep 13, 2010 4:14 PM PDT via mobile reply actions

by 


































