Seahawks Win by 30; Chargers Win on a Last-Second Field Goal
I can't tell you if Matt Hasselbeck will struggle this week. I can not tell you whether the Seahawks will win or lose. Football Outsiders readers might note that the hosting Seahawks own the better DVOA of the two. That and home field advantage predict a Seahawks victory, and maybe Seattle will be victorious. I wouldn't base my hopes on DVOA, but, then, what is there to base our fears off of?
Philip Rivers name recognition? Antonio Gates? The fact that in past seasons the Chargers have been contenders and the Seahawks have not?
None of that matters. It's perception, a step down from DVOA.
Football is the most unpredictable of professional sports. Some of that is because of the short season. Some of that is because the relative dearth of meaningful information we can gather about a football team. Most of it is that football, unlike any other game I can think of, lacks any kind of singular, defining matchup. There is no pitcher-batter interface. No center-center matchup. There is no regular, repeated ability we can be sure will persevere.
This Sunday, Seattle will start 22 men and San Diego will start 22 men. Through the course of the game, other players will rotate in. At some point, Colin Cole will match up against Nick Hardwick. If Hardwick is pass blocking, and the Chargers run a play-action, seven step drop, for one snap, we will see how Hardwick and Cole compare accomplishing that task.
Meanwhile, all around them, the game state, down and distance, and play of their teammates will influence how we perceive Cole and Hardwick's performance.
Cole and Hardwick make a living sacrificing their bodies, and though neither may be injured, both's health will, thoughout the game, be in a constant state of flux. One snap, Cole might be winded, or he might have taken a leg whip in the pile and be a little gimpy, and on that snap, Cole will be a fundamentally different player. He might be slower, weaker, and even if only a tiny bit, it factors.
And so, for one snap, a never-again Colin Cole will face a never-again Nick Hardwick. The two will struggle, one attempting to rush the passer, the other, defending the passer. Hardwick will hand off, Rivers will drop, receivers will run routes, other offensive linemen will block, and every Charger, every Seahawks will influence Hardwick-Cole. When it's done, we will know who was better. We will know who won a battle that will never be duplicated.
Right now, people see the Chargers as an erstwhile contender, still good but fading, and the Seahawks a collapsing franchise, not yet recovered. They see Philip Rivers as a franchise quarterback and Matt Hasselbeck a former franchise quarterback. None of that is necessarily untrue, but it's just perception, not fact, not something to base a prediction off of.
The game will be decided by millions of unique interactions we can not possibly anticipate. Will Norv Turner stick with the run, or will he adjust and pass first? What kind of runs will he call and in what situations? When he does pass, what plays will he call? If Legedu Naanee runs a post pattern, can Kelly Jennings cover that? How about an out, or a double move, what specifically can Jennings do against Naanee, what is he good at, when will he have safety help, how much time will Rivers have in the pocket on any particular pass, who will be in his throwing lane, where will the tip fly--
When the Giants beat the undefeated Patriots in Super Bowl XLII, it was called one of the great upsets in sports history. It was, in a way. I am not advocating complete and utter football agnosticism. Football teams share enough traits that we can broadly measure things like passing game efficiency, running game efficiency, ability to force turnovers. Broadly.
What I am arguing is this: Football is not about points or yards or turnovers. It is about one snap covering a slant. It is about one snap stuffing the fullback in the hole. It is about designing a coverage scheme to protect third and seven. Do we know for sure that Seattle will be good at defending third and seven on this snap, at home, from a 3-3 against a three wide receiver, "I" formation?
No, we don't. And as such, if we do not know the component abilities of the Seahawks and Chargers, if we can not be sure which of those abilities will be challenged, if we can not anticipate what game they will play, what snap by snap matchups will decide this game, or if Jennings can cover Naanee on a double move on third and two, we can't possibly know who will win this Sunday.
And we can't. Football is not nine innings of fastballs and line drives. It's not tallest man rebounds. It's intricate and messy and unpredictable and fluid and a battle in the trenches one second and a foot race up the sideline another. So, in light of an unknown future, I only have one more thing to say:
SEA!
29 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Actually, the correct awnser is TTLE!
But as a consolidation prize you get a year’s supply of Turtle Wax.
Hawks indeed!
John, I love this kind of post. While I’m always fascinated with the explications and comments on the breaking down the plays, I must admit to being overwhelmed sometimes by the details. Mebane over the middle against who knows what kind of blocking, he does something that may be great but doesn’t affect the play itself, his teammates do other things, and, yay, we win. It’s violent ballet, I tells ya.
God, I love football season.
Have an affair and a lovechild?
Yeah, we heard.
by Lanky on Sep 24, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
This is both why I love football and read here so much.
No other site I’ve been to has been able to so clearly describe the intricacies and unpredictability of football as well as an in-depth fieldgulls think peice.
7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!
by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 24, 2010 4:24 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Totally agree.
I usually browse our opponent’s sportsblog leading up to gameday, like I am sure many of you do. I just have to say that I am continually amazed and impressed at the level of detail, quality insight and dedication John puts into Field Gulls. Not to slight other blogs, (which I am about to do) but this place is head and shoulders above what is posted on other team sites.
I’ve been a Hawks fan ever since I can remember (29 now), but I have learned so much about football since joining this site. Thanks John!
by sadface on Sep 25, 2010 12:12 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
There used to be a tangible certainty...
And he wore #71. How the plays or games turned out were still out of his control, but one could absoutely be sure that all Walter Joneses were “ever-again”, and whatever “never-again” the counterpart was would not be enough.
by Stay Off the Flowers on Sep 24, 2010 5:06 PM PDT reply actions
So, as a Seahawks fan
am I hoping that it rains on sunday (like the forecast is looking like) or for clear skies?
Definitly hoping for Rain
Would rather have rivers throwing a slippery ball and our run D in control of the game.
Fade routes to Deion Branch only work against Kelly Jennings
by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 24, 2010 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions
In my Madden franchise, I set the single game rushing record
against the Chargers.
With CJ Spiller
Whom I got by trading Josh Wilson to Detroit for a first rounder, which I flipped to the Bills with Leon Washington for Spiller.
MAKE ME GM!
Wanna hear about my new car on The Sims?
That pony be fly, dawg. Gid-dy-up!
inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
You're an outstanding writer, John
Gives me something to aim for. Even though I know you should be a first-rate version of yourself and not a second-rate version of somebody else. But enough of the mancrush.
HAWKS!
Eddie Izzard ran 43 marathons in 51 days with 5 weeks of training. What's stopping you?
One of the best things you've written here, JM
Seriously, great stuff. It’s an honor to be able to share the stage with you, even though we don’t agree on everything regarding our Seahawks.
My blog: Dave Krieg's Strike Beard
by Johnny Peel (DKSB) on Sep 24, 2010 5:59 PM PDT reply actions
This is a great post.
Seems like you wanted something different perhaps, but standing in front of a board of ideas you’re scratching your head as much as we all are. Try not to lose hair like me.
by Joshua Kasparek on Sep 24, 2010 6:04 PM PDT reply actions
thanks
one of your better posts. its clemons time!
FENCE!!!!!!!!!!
John, awesome article. I always wanted to get into coaching, and what you just wrote is absolutley true, no 2 plays are ever the same.
Just the different schemes, personnel, and possibilities make the game so great.
It is a game of "ifs" this week
“If” the Matt Hasslebeck from last week shows up, Seattle will lose.
“If” the Defense that showed a lack of ability for tackling and covering a rookie receiver last week shows up, sorry but once again Seattle loses.
If however, Matt can play with anyuthing close to resembling athletic competentcy and the D from week one rears it’s ugly head, they have just as much of a chance to win as the Chargers will have. Perhaps more because the game is at home.
John Hancock
i guess people forget the dramatic changes that occurred prior to the beginning of this season.
it’s also clear that Hasslebeck and the rest of the offense are not in sync. in fact it may take another game or two before we can properly gauge the performance of our offense.
if anyone has noticed seahawks were mentioned to end up last in the division. yet in a span of couple weeks we have a chance to win the division!
go hawks! ignore the haters!
Blaccuweather forcast: It's Gonna Rain!
a storms brews and swells
a sea submerges rivers
deluge of defeat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCK7njbgDO8
Prepare for scare
"It's always a bad play when the other team scores." - John Madden

by 


































