Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

An Aside About Field Gulls

Star-divide

Years into doing this, I now can't even watch Matt Hasselbeck throw a pass without ambivalence, a sense that my love of this team is somehow at odds with my professional goals. As I explained to my wife last night, I just want Seattle to win, but it feels like I need Seattle to win the right way, and lose the right way, the way I said they would, or suffer a perceived loss of credibility and a resulting reduced chance of professional success.

Consider Darryl Tapp. Do I know exactly how 4-3 ends develop, and what profile is particularly able to break out, and if Tapp is someone that develops quickly and then fades, or if Tapp is someone just tapping into his potential and the Seahawks are committing another Michael McCrary-like blunder because of a fixation on size? No, though I did think the possibility of the latter outweighed the gains of trading him. So I wrote as much. And over the months, that's been distilled into something very monochrome and opaque: I thought it was a stupid move. I thought the front office had screwed up royal.

Tapp didn't impress in camps or preseason. Tapp didn't play in the first two regular season games. Tapp played in the third and had a sack. Clemons had two sacks the same day. Clemons has stayed healthy so far. At this moment in time, the Seahawks are winning the trade and by a good bit, and a lot of people think I am an idiot for every disagreeing with the decision.

I got to tell you folks, I'm not an idiot and I'm not a genius, and just because I thought Mark Sanchez was a risky prospect, it doesn't mean I am desperate for him to fail. Mostly, I just do not want Seattle to have lost out on a franchise quarterback. I still don't think they did.

The immediate, unfiltered feedback produced by the internet can be overwhelming, and I'm not someone that likes praise and I'm not someone that can minimize the opinions of others by minimizing others, and though it makes me happy that Field Gulls is an intelligent and growing community, the level of animosity between members embarrasses me and often makes me not want to load the site in the morning. We can barely have an extended comment thread without members engaging in a flame war.

You know what I fear when the Seahawks lose? The resulting anger fans will direct at each other. That has been true every year I have done this. And this year, because I did not agree with every move the front office made, because many of us did not agree with every move the front office made, I face the exact same prospect when the team wins. People come here to fight.

I have never had less fun writing for Field Gulls than I have had this year. I have never seen the community so confrontational, belligerent and polarized. I don't know where this attitude started but it's killing my fire.

I ask, as an honest question to members of the Field Gulls community, what is it that you want from this site? I am sick of the rancor, the in-fighting, the pissing contests about who's the biggest fan, who's most knowledgeable, who's right. Why must a thread about what players tweeted become a referendum on the Darryl Tapp trade?

There are thousands of us that come to this site on a daily basis, and as someone that eats and sleeps staring at the Field Goals front page, I'm starting to wonder why. The Seahawks are 2-1. The Seahawks beat the 49ers and the big bad Chargers, and should win the West, and are definitely building something worth following, but following one of the biggest wins in years, all that Field Gulls cares about is beating dead horses, fighting old wars and picking new scabs.

That sucks.

Comment 361 comments  |  10 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Seconded

Just keep putting up your original and unique analysis, John. And stay humble.

When this blog has been great, it was great because John wasn’t trying to make it more than it is – one fan’s studied and articulate appreciations of his team. When it has been less than great, its usually because of the “I know better than the GM” type of posts.

The rest of us could help elevate the discourse here by occasionally being humble as well, myself included. Usually if I’ve dared say something positive here about our team’s GM, be it John Schneider or Tim Ruskell, someone had to accuse me of ‘appealing to authority’. Well, questioning team management in the context of being a fan is one thing, but saying that a professional GM who has worked for years for NFL teams doesn’t know his business is always over the line in my book. I’ve studied a thousand hours of game tape in my life and I played ball in college, yet I won’t pretend I know more than John Schneider knows after intensely studying the NFL while surrounded by pro scouts for years. Pretending we somehow know more than the pros know is just setting ourselves up to look stupid in the end. We’ve all done it. Nothing can save us from that kind of fate except a little humility.

"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank

by Stevo's on Sep 27, 2010 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

The pros make mistakes every single day

No one is infallible (but they do have access to lots resources and information that fans don’t).

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Sep 28, 2010 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

All I want

is analysis of plays and performance of players. Because there is not currently another Seahawks site doing that. You do great work.

From The Hawks Nest - Seahawks Podcast
http://www.http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/from-the-hawks-nest/id385227705

by Hancock.Brett on Sep 27, 2010 5:38 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I second this.

Chad Brown for the Ring of Honor!

by Big Seahawk Loser on Sep 27, 2010 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I completely agree

I love this site! The only other site I visit is Blue Bird Herd (think that’s it) and it doesn’t offer what Field Gulls offers. I may not agree with everything John write or post all the time. But I do enjoy reading all post regardless. Keep up the Good Work!

by cthunder on Sep 28, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

subject line
I’m not someone that likes praise

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCK7njbgDO8

Prepare for scare

"It's always a bad play when the other team scores." - John Madden

by jubelthebear on Sep 27, 2010 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed on everything.

I’ve gotten pretty annoyed with some of the comments on several threads.

I do think that this is not the only blog suffering this. Bloody Elbow, which is the MMA blog on SB Nation, had an infestation of trolls and confrontational people once it became more popular. As a result there were mass bannings and pissing contests with the writing staff which still occurs today.

Just my view, I think Field Gulls is getting the same thing. I think you stated traffic shot up during the draft and it’s obviously coerced people into signing up from all walks of the internets, and this includes guys who should probably be on the ESPN commenting boards. They could subside, or we could have even more trolls on FG and we may essentially have to have stricter rules or a tweak in the guidelines and rules here.

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 5:38 PM PDT reply actions  

I come here for really sharp analysis

From much better football minds and eyes than mine.

by Cougriculture on Sep 27, 2010 5:38 PM PDT reply actions  

The analysis

That’s what I come here for. That’s what I will continue to come here for. I don’t think you’ve ever acted as if you were somehow some kind of football xo god with the power of foresight. That other people like to come here, point and say “I told you so!” is on them and more than anything is a sign of a good job like SSreporters said. Keep on keepin on, John!!

"I call the big one Bitey."-Homer J. Simpson

by Willie Mays Haze on Sep 27, 2010 5:41 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I pretty much want what you want.

We seem to be living in a world where we react online instantly, and as the years go by, more and more people will be of that culture. Maybe it is bad manners, poor parenting, diminishing brain-cells, or pod-people. Whatever it is, I agree that is seems worse this year than years past. But Fieldgulls is definitely not at the point where my local paper message threads are. Those are painful, troll-ridden and leave me wondering why I started reading them in the first-place.

I like it here. I could like it more with some tweaks, but most of those are individual changes, and not site-wide.

by Chirp on Sep 27, 2010 5:44 PM PDT reply actions  

You guys are answering as if he's asking about articles

I thought he was asking about community. Though I would figure, John, having access to our usernumbers, that while you highly value community, and I figure a lot of people do read comments, there’s also some traffic purely for articles. Which makes sense.

If that’s the case: eh? Seriously, this is the internet, and sports, rancor, stabbing and “I MUST BE RIGHT IT IS IMPORTANT” attitude is just part of the package. Can’t say I think it’s a big deal.

Besides, I think some of the rancor was fostered by how unwelcome dissenting voices are here. I saw plenty of that myself just after registering, and still now. If someone gets knocks for dissenting, the situation quickly spirals out of control.

It’s a two-way game of a settled community with little patience for people new to “settled” debates and new users looking to express themselves. That doesn’t really have an organizational solution, it’s organic by definition. Unless you wish to suppress either side, strictly and in regulations, it’s hard to “steer” the community right.

by Thomas Beekers on Sep 27, 2010 5:45 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I appreciate this comment, and maybe it answers a bit what I am asking

do people that disagree with my front page opinions feel shouted down and thus in need of fighting back violently?

by John Morgan on Sep 27, 2010 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do believe that the minority tend to shout louder

And right now anything involving Hasselbeck or Coaching Staff/GM has them coming out of hibernation.

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's part of it

But while I have poked fun at the “hive mind” here at times, it’s also a mark of a community focused on a single subject anywhere: the community, not just the “leading minds” but all of it, discuss things to death as they happen. Tapp, Wilson, Whitehurst? It doesn’t get resolved but it gets resolved to the minds of the majority. Even those that disagree know the arguments.

Then a new guy comes in. Does he have new arguments? Not really. Is it easy to abrasively dismiss him when he repeats the same old arguments? Yip.

The above is normal. It happens everywhere.

The “disagree with front page” opinions is not quite as normal, but not completely unique for a community with a leading voice. You want a place where any kind of opinion is welcome as long as it is not insulting. You are well respected and that is justified, yeah. Does that make disagreeing with you by definition an unwelcome form of behavior? It seems like it does, and that’s a problem, that engenders aggressive behavior.

This place kind of needs a leading voice of dissent. That’s not a likely scenario. Skipping that, it needs for the community to deal better with smaller dissenting voices. How? I dunno.

by Thomas Beekers on Sep 27, 2010 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Well said all around.

I do think, it’s on us. If a dissenting voice pops up, it’s a sensitive matter. It doesn’t have to be but it’s become one. It’s incumbent on the incumbents to have more discretion in dealing with that person, while still saying our own piece.

by jacobstevens on Sep 27, 2010 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Naturally

But that’s pretty hard to do when you come somewhere with good intentions and find only a cold shoulder.

In other words, I kind of understand the behaviour on both sides when this happens. You’re asking for some patience from the community and some tough skin from any newcomers. That will usually break down somewhere.

by Thomas Beekers on Sep 27, 2010 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

But isn't this true in just about any community you take part of either on the internet or in life?

Can we afford to ease up on the pile-on mentality, yes. However dissenting voices here have gotten way too defensive way too quickly as well.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree.

Unfortunately, I’m annoyed because I can rarely provide a dissenting voice, as I rarely dissent with John. This, by the way, drives me batty. And when someone disagrees with me, I’m more than interested in having a dialog. However, I also don’t bruise too easy.

I see a lot of the “dissenting voice” defend without logic and reason, or worse with deep logical flaws, and then never resign a point.

This of course leads to the perceived pile-on mentality, because the defender of said point seems to very rarely retreat, or even acknowledge that they might possibly be wrong.

It might be a reflection of our society in general. Everyone everywhere seems to be picking sides. Politics is all about extremes, religion the same. Maybe they’ve always been that way. But now even minute topics lead to people digging their heels in the sand and never ever resigning a point to the other side.

And I think that’s a shame, but it’s also a habit. And John’s post reminded me of my own habits at time of rapid response. So now I’m going to make a habit of being a little less snarky, a little more welcoming of the counter opinion. But I would also ask others to do the same.

It truly is up to us to make our community what we want it to be, and the only way to do so if for us all to govern both ourselves and our cohabitants.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 27, 2010 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Seriously?!?

I’ve only posted a few times and I distinctly remember you disagreeing with me (I don’t recall what it was about), and though you expressed your opinion thoroughly, I for one didn’t feel shouted down at all.

Maybe we could put a banner up that says, “Not everyone will agree with everything you say… no matter how smart you are… It doesn’t mean they are less of a ’Hawks fan than you…”

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

You put more thought and research into the Seahawks than anyone else, it's rare for a dissenting voice to be as diligent

Yes, it looks like the Seahawks are winning the Tapp/Clemons trade, even though it’s only been 3 games. At the time of the trade, however, you did an EXCELLENT job of outlining Tapp’s talent and abilities, Clemons lack of production and injury history, and the value of a 4th round pick. The point of analysis is not to be proven right; it’s to determine good and bad processes. There have been players like Tapp that have regressed after switching teams, there have been players like Clemons that have improved in a scheme better suited to his talents, and there have been 4th round picks that have later become pro bowlers; you convi9nced me and many others here that what we had in Tapp was likely to be worth more than what we got in return. As a Seahawks fan I had to hope you would be wrong, but I never thought for a minute you erred in the assessment of the trade when it happened.

I don’t shout down people who disagree with you John (or at least I think I don’t), but I do try to point out when people have made arguments with poor logic or reasoning. I trust John wouldn’t make an opinion without some facts supporting it, that he wouldn’t dismiss information because it conflicted with his desired narrative, and would avoid resorting to easy or cliched answers. None of us are perfect; I have said some things that were wrong and have not been offended (or tried really hard not to) when corrected….I tend to agree with John and give him a huge benefit of the doubt when I disagree, so if someone else disagreed with John I would need ample evidence to be swayed.

You’ve set a high bar here at FG, John, and I don’t think that’s anything to be ashamed of. And if a little bit of rancor is caused by the healthy amount of intelligent conversation here, then so be it.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its late, prob wont get read but yes

with alot of obvious man crushes on John and the subsequent knee jerk reactions to any dissenting opinions it get a little heated real fast and the defenders of the realm being not only walking football encyclopedia’s but able and willing verbal combatents it decends into bedlam quickly. And it also makes poeple (with any sense) hesitant to express their opinion, as they will only get shouted down by internet ninja’s and made to feel an idiot to have an opinion and dare to express it. Kind of football snobbery.

by canter on Sep 27, 2010 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm mostly a lurker

And when FG transitioned over to SBN I did notice a sort of “clique” form amongst the more frequent posters which seemed a bit snobish. However I’ve come to enjoy the clique because these people have some very knowledgeable comments and seem to police the site and keep the riff raff down. It actually makes me try to formulate a more thoughtful comment, or more likely, just shut the hell up until I know what the hell I’m talking about.

Love this site John, stay strong brother!

by Surf Hawk on Sep 27, 2010 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

No kidding!

I have to do a ton of research to post something that doesn’t out me as an idiot. When I post, it’s straight from a deep well of emotion regarding the Seahawks. When people bag on Hasselbeck for instance, I bristle immediately. I see him as the best QB we’ve ever had, and he seems to be a pretty good guy to boot. Do I know that his days are numbered? sigh Yes. But I won’t celebrate it, and I will not take it well when it happens. So when I see John calling it over for Matt, I don’t like it. Is he right? I don’t even care! His arguments are sound. His passion is genuine. And whether or not I agree, and whether or not he’s right, I feel like a better informed fan for having read that article.

This is my go-to place for Seahawks news, and when the discussion gets snarky or sophomoric I just skip that section and Z down to where the conversation veers back to more insightful (or funnier) posts.

My posts rarely clear the bar for rational, well-thought-out, logical argument. But if you want a glass-is-half-full, never-say-die, homer foaming at the mouth and screaming “I’m In!”, then I’m your guy! :) I’ve read the “Be Irrational” chapter of “100 Things…” out loud to damn near everyone I know so that they can have a hope of understanding my fandom.

I guess what I am trying to say is, I need FG as much as I need a 8-0 record at home this year and a split road record, and heck, why not, a playoff victory or two!

Thanks to John and ALL the posters for keeping this a vital, dynamic source of fan-crack for this addict.

by Tigloki on Sep 28, 2010 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, so we're just talking about how people can be dicks on the internet?

Because if we’re talking about what I want from the Field Gulls community, I think its about time they gave me a sandwich.

by Anticitizen_One on Sep 27, 2010 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I couldn't agree more with you Vasilii.

I’m glad that you wrote this and I didn’t because I would have come off a little more abrasive. The fact that most dissenting voices are “new” says a lot to me. It says people that do not wish to participate in the “hive-mind” are basically run out of town. It’s natural for people to get defensive when attacked. Couple that with the fact that this is the internet and you don’t risk getting socked in the brain for acting the fool, and you get what we got.

It would be nice if some of the regulars would help police by “calling off the dogs” occasionally. There are just a handful of people here that do the piling on and it wouldn’t take but more than a few friendly reminders to sort the situation out.

That doesn’t mean calling a troll a troll. It’s odd… but that is very rarely the end of the dust-up.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am sorry that you feel this way, John.

I don’t read every thread and I don’t really get into the discussions of why certain moves are good or bad, so I don’t get the whole experience of what takes place here.

I love this team. I love this site. I love the passion in your writing. Writing a blog about anything is difficult to do, especially because you open yourself up to criticism. For the people who question your intelligence and passion for football, they can go to hell. If they don’t like what you write about, they can go elsewhere.

Whatever you decide to do from this time forward, I am behind your decision. I know Jeff at LL went through a similar experience not long ago. It is not easy being you guys and I respect all the effort that goes into building a community like this. You certainly don’t get compensated enough.

Thanks for all you do.

by Wilder. on Sep 27, 2010 5:48 PM PDT reply actions  

personally, i dont want a damn thing changed.

You are tghe one who really makes this website what it is Jon, hence why I’ve been reading it for two years. “Tappageddon” was actually the motivator to have me make a screen name and be more active. Not for the sake of voicing my own opinion, but so I could feel more connected in a community which shares the same passion as I do for the Seahawks. That very same passion which I saw bubble over the Tapp trade, which, looking back, seems more comical now. At the time I remember having a nuclear breakdown and my poor girlfriend had to deal with me frothing at the mouth over names she, like most people, knows nothing about.
     Cut yourself some slack man. This is by far the most intelligent, non-confrontational sports blog I’ve visited, and I’ve visited a lot of them. Nowhere else can even compare to the insight that this site provides. Everyone has their opinions, but not everyone is as good at voicing them as you are. Provided we don’t get flooded with trolls, name-bashing, and anything resembling a PFT message bored, I would say we are in the right direction and for that I say thanks to you and everyone else who contributes dilligently to this site.

7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!

by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 27, 2010 5:51 PM PDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

John...

You’re doing a great job, and please keep up the good work.

To the rest of us….
The Hawks are 2 and 1, and with a great chance to go into the bye at 3 and 1, get some rest and our LT back, and keep rolling.

Let’s just enjoy it huh?

by skwid206 on Sep 27, 2010 5:52 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I don't get what the arguing is about.

We’re all passionate about football, but no matter what we think we know we’re all just speculating.

That’s why they play on Sundays. To see who wins on the field, not on paper.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 5:52 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't always agree with your opinion....

But I always appreciate your dedication and candor. This community has improved over the past several seasons, and provided me the means to quantify my despair, at the worst of times, and find hope in the upcoming season. That season is now. Keep up the quality analysis. B

by The-Wes on Sep 27, 2010 5:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Keep your chin up.

I have long seen the pseudo-intellectual debating that goes on here, and I see it as kind of a Fight Club. We love football. All forums of football discussion plumb the depths of human inanity. But football is the thinking man’s sport. And we’re smart! Now we find a place where intelligent discourse springs, and it’s a chance for us to exercise our skillzez. See what we’re made of.

Are we smart, really? Do we measure up, mentally, in general, but about football in particular? I am Jack’s cracking knuckles. I can see now that I had been motivated in the past to see how I measure up against smart minds like Brian, Aron and guys like Nate Dogg. And if they’re Soda Popinski and the Sandman, you’re Mike Tyson. I can only imagine others subconsciously do the same.

Not that I condone it, but I understand. And I can definitely empathize with you. It gets under my skin, too.

That this matters to you this much, exemplifies the quality of the community pastoring and not just the content.

Lord knows I would have an enormous amount of trouble being thick skinned enough to handle what you face, not to mention what Sando faces despite his attempting to be the most objective ESPN writer ever. I don’t have any real sage advice, except not to let it get you down. Haters gonna hate. You make more of a difference in community than you know.

by jacobstevens on Sep 27, 2010 5:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks to everyone that's saying something nice, and I appreciate that

but I think I may have buried my intention here.

What I want to know is, why is it that Field Gulls can not be a community that allows for disagreement but unites behind the team? If that makes sense.

It seems like a lot of people feel like they can’t disagree, and I don’t like that, and it seems like a lot people feel like they can only disagree by being belligerent, and that wears me down. Maybe it’s like trying to talk and fearing that you’ll be shouted down and so responding by being more militant, more intimidating, and if that’s so, is there anything we can do so that people don’t feel shouted down, don’t feel a need to fight just to be heard?

Or is it, as a lot of people seem to be saying, that there is no way to avoid people being rude and obnoxious? This might sound strange, but I don’t have much stomach for misanthropy and solutions that involve ignoring others because, well, screw them, don’t appeal to me.

by John Morgan on Sep 27, 2010 6:05 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

You could always ban people who can't be civil.

It sounds harsh, but you know, house rules and all of that…

by Culter on Sep 27, 2010 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

we can ban one person. We can ban one person a day, and it will not take care of the problem. Yes, some people absolutely must be banned, because they’re here just to piss people off, but it’s even better to take away the cause and the incentive, and that’s what I am hoping we can do.

For one thing, if someone challenges another person’s fandom, ignore it and ignore the person making the comment. In a lot of ways, I think people find being banned a validation, and just ignoring trollish comments is a much better way of taking that incentive away.

by John Morgan on Sep 27, 2010 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is excellent advice

Just because someone actually is Hawks fan, doesn’t mean they can’t also engage in trollish behavior. There’s a lot to be said for exercising self-control as a reader/commenter as well.

Not that I’m not guilty of it myself all the time, but it’s worth remembering that no one ever proves anyone wrong on the internet.

by Kingdomer on Sep 27, 2010 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let me ask you this, John

When someone makes an obviously trollish comment, would it be okay for us to flag such a comment? I understand that you might not want us to “take the bait” and argue with such comments (especially if the commenter isn’t trying to be argumentative), but I for one wouldn’t want to completely ignore any comments that were as intentionally bad as the one I think you are referring to.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yes there is a flag for trolling.

Please please please use the flags more often. Personally I’ll skip over a bunch of comments but if its flagged I will for sure look into it.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 27, 2010 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Will do

I just assumed the Flag button was for obvious forms of commenter abuse, or spamming. I will make sure to use it in lieu of engaging trolls or ensnaring myself in circular, infinite arguments.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes yes yes

Please use the flag button.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would suggest adding an "Off-topic" and/or "Inentionally Argumentative" options to the Flag button

Some comments I may want to flag because they start/will likely start a flame war of some kind, but the comment itself is not that bad. I just think the current options given for the Flag button might make me less inclined to use it.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I tried it on another commenter

But when I chose an option it didn’t respond, and I didn’t see a “send” button anywhere. Maybe it’s my browser or my display settings, but something wasn’t right.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Weird....it's now working for me, too

Before I didn’t see the Submit button but now it’s there. Whatever the problem was, it’s been fixed.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

There are times when the formatting of the flag box can get screwed up

It seems to go away on its own after a while. Some sort of javascript caching issue.

by Matthew on Sep 28, 2010 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow.

That was pretty harsh. I missed it the first time around. Well, as I bellowed at a co-worker once when I was massively upset over losing a customer I had worked really hard to save, and she said, “You can’t win ’em all.”

“YEAH, BUT YOU CAN * WANT * TO!”

I was right to be passionate. I was right to bristle when my passion went awry. And you, John, are right to be disappointed when someone launches on you, purposefully aiming for your obvious soft spots. You “lost a customer” on this one guy.

So, illegitimi non carborundum man, illegitimi non carborundum!

Keep up the good work.

by Tigloki on Sep 28, 2010 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Let the people speak...

And if ya disagree make your point and let them keep on rolling…

I mean folks are going to get loud and heated when they feel like there is a fight, most of the flame threads occur because not everyone is an articulate logical debater. Even when I disagree with you I can see your reasoning and logic.

What I am trying to say though, is that when your point is made (and I mean anyone not just you John), leave well enough alone… you will not ever convince everyone… the strongest argument often involves allowing others to hang themselves with their own words…

Just a thought

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

my take on the disagreements and uniting on the team is.......

rebuilding vs. whoa, we can win the division. Hass is one missed block away from retirement. CW is no QB of the future.

They’ve blown up the roster and everyone has an opinion on where to go. Turns out QPM know what they’re doing. I want them to blow it up some more.

I don’t want an 8-8 division title.

I don’t want another Hass.
I don’t want another Dave Kreig
I don’t want another Rick Mirer/Dan McGuire

I want a franchise QB, and as long as they make this season exciting….I’ll be happy.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hass was a franchise QB at one point...

Just sayin’. People around here treat him like dirt because he doesn’t have an arm like Rogers.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've never been a believer in Hass.

Not a hater, just never too impressed. I rated him as adequate, like Dilfer.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hasselbeck was a great QB in his prime

Anyone think of a QB who was great but never elite?

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

If by his prime you mean 2 or 3 good seasons. Sure.

But that’s just my opinion. Like I posted further up, I don’t get the arguing. This is speculation and opinions. Nothing more.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or is it because it's en vogue to hate on him?

Not trying to start a fight, especially on this post, but I’m honestly just curious why you don’t think he was a good quarterback?

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was good. So was Dave Kreig

He’s never been the Ice cold killer under center though. Seattle is one of a handful of teams never to have a franchise QB. No Manning, Montana, Elway, Marino…. you get the idea.

We’ve had 2 QBs that were almost good enough to win it all. And Hass had two of the best OL ever to put a helmet on clearing half the field.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alright, that I can understand.

He still never really had the recievers to be a one of those kinds of quarterbacks. Not saying that’s the reason, but behind every Montana there is a Rice, every Manning a Harrison, and etc.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was a good-to-excellent QB from 2002 to 2007

Which should constitute his “prime.” I think some people forget that the passing game was the best part of the Seahawks team BEFORE the 2005 Super Bowl run. I would also say ’03, ’04, ’05 and ’07 were excellent seasons for Matt.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kelly was elite.

So was Marino. Lack of rings doesn’t take “eliteness” away.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is just begging for a thread jack. Allow me to retort.

Randall Cunningham.
Big Ben.
Warren Moon? (I can see elite here.)
Joe Theismann? (maybe some call him elite)
Jim Plunkett.
Bernie Kosar.
Vinnie Testerverde.
Ken Stabler.
Ken Anderson.
Archie Manning.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 27, 2010 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hass is probably my favorite Seahawk...

Granted I was too young to really watch the ‘Hawks until the late ’80’s and by then Krieg was declining rapidly… so biases aside, Matt had 2 or 3 really good seasons and another 2 acceptable seasons (with lesser surrounding talent) and has been pretty much terrible for the last two years.

I honestly can’t wait for the franchise QB of the future… but since I don’t think he’s on the roster and since we are currently making a strong case for winning the division I’m content to watch Matt not lose games (any more like Denver and I may change my tune ;)

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

We should have been up by 28 at halftime vs. San Diego

We’re scheming our offense around his weaknesses. Other coaches will figure out how to shut us down soon enough.

by hazbro24 on Sep 27, 2010 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

true!

But seriously… has Matt ever (I mean ever???) been able to throw a fade? And is the fade route supposed to be run by the short speed guy that can’t beat man press coverage?

If we are going to cheme around his weakness can we just scheme all the way around it ;)

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

and the long "bomb" that wasn't...

I really think Mike Williams catches that ball if it’s thrown by someone with the arm to make the throw… it sucks to watch Matt try those… arm strength was never something he had an abundance of… and now… it’s just plain hideous.

Actually reminds me of a boxing match… De La Hoya v. Paqi… (sorry spelling is not my strength)… it was seriously like watching my grandpa get beat up… such a bad way to end a pretty darn good career (not to imply Matt’s football career is as accomplished as De La Hoya’s boxing…)

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a complicated question that if we truly answer/solve we could make millions

Sports are emotional and bring out the most passionate parts of people. A sports blog has the potential to be any normal internet message board cubed in terms of obnoxious behavior. I get in arguments with my friends as we watch the Hawks together about personnel, decision making, etc. but there’s something about being in person that prevents you from punching them. On the web you can more easily give the virtual slug and people tend to keep punching – plus you can’t get those signals that its time to stop. Not to mention many are general NW sports fans who tend to be the most beat upon and depressed these days (maybe Cleveland is worse) so we tend to overreact.

I actually think a lot of the disagreements are a sign that you have a very passionate group of fans here. I think the limits you’ve set actually have worked well by not being too restrictive, but asking for at least some minimal sense of humanity. I think I can only think of 5-10 true trolls (by my limited definition) since I’ve joined. I know one thing for sure I’d be very sad if this blog disappeared. Football would not feel the same to me. You’re posts gave me a new appreciation for a sport that I for a long time was only really casually engaged with. I began to understand nuances I never could before and became a smarter? fan.

Solutions? Maybe lock down on non-gamethread discussions a little more, because you won’t stop people from venting when they need to but it might force more serious consideration before we post. And maybe we as readers need to take a second to think about how we handle ourselves on here because if we don’t behave you may not think its worthwhile. This one may be on us to fix for you.

by illwillbli on Sep 27, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's two fold, the state of the team leads to a lot of discussion and a lot of your ideas about football go a bit against the grain.

A lot of the topics discussed on Field Gulls challenge how people think about the game and that leads to disagreement. Combine that with two bad years of Seahawk teams and the huge overturn we saw this off season and we’re left with a lot of things people are still hashing out.

As far as why people are nasty to each other, insert XKCD and Penny Arcade comics here. With as much discussion as this site fosters people are going to be wrong from time to time, and no one likes to admit they’re wrong. I think on the whole everyone handles it all very well, but with the sheer number of threads Field Gulls has there are bound to be some outbursts. We’ve all been guilty of it at some point. Moderation with a little more bite might help that, although I know thats not how you like to run things, but it’ll never go away.

by Nate Dogg on Sep 27, 2010 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Challenging how I think about the game

is what drew me to this site in the first place. It will engage and impress some people and disturb and aggravate others. Every Seahawks fan…hell, every football fan forms and holds unshakable beliefs about their team. At some point you will strike a nerve, because that’s what original thought does to entrenched belief, and the magic of the internet allows this to manifest in what we call flame wars. But for fuck’s sake, don’t stop.

The rules and standards of this blog are more than fair. I doubt that a bit more assertive moderation would have a negative effect on the community.

"Have a good time all the time" - Viv Savage, Spinal Tap

by HawksFanHernandez on Sep 27, 2010 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

no one likes to admit they’re wrong.

I, for one, most certainly will, if ever the event actually occurs.

You touch on a very good point here. It’s very hard to admit when we’re wrong. Because we’re prideful. And when someone is prideful people want to see you taken down a peg. It would be good to foster a sense of humility in the community. We are here because of the honest look at the game and the team. All the more better if we’re also honest about ourselves.

by jacobstevens on Sep 28, 2010 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

It might be hard for some of us regulars to remember that not everyone has the time or inclination to follow the Seahawks as closely as us

Not saying you’re a bad fan or not smart, but not everyone who comments here may choose to be as “regular” as others. I think most of us want to foster healthy, constructive debate about the Seahawks, but it’s also a fine line between debate and a mental tug-of-war. While regulars should be free to point out if a comment is incorrect or illogical in any way….um, well, maybe we can be a little more pleasant about how we do it.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm... maybe as a part of FG membership

Attendance at a face-to-face meetup is required… replete with metal detectors of course! Trolls don’t do well in the light of day from what I hear… and of course another reason to drink copious amounts of fall-down-water with the boys is always a good thing!

by dassler10 on Sep 27, 2010 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

As a long time lurker

I think it’s important to realize that the voices you read in the average comment thread don’t necessarily reflect the greater readership at whole.

I can probably count on one hand the number of times I’ve posted on this site, but I’ve been a member/followed the site for years, and consider it (and John Morgan) specifically the best source for Seahawks insight on the web – or any other media for that matter. I have a friend who’s from Pittsburgh and loves the Steelers (I know, I know), and he was shocked and just a little bit jealous at the intelligence and detail of the content on this site when I showed him it. Apparently other fans aren’t as spoiled as we are.

I don’t comment often because frankly I don’t have much to add. But I think that there are quite of few of us out there that check each day for your posts, silently appreciating the work that you do. It’s unfortunate that some people prefer to use this as a forum to indulge their inner-pettiness, but on behalf of the vast majority of us, thank you for your work and I hope you continue.

by J Sep on Sep 27, 2010 6:05 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I wholeheartedly second this entire post.

I, too, rarely post, but look forward to coming to work Monday (no internet at home) to read the new stuff.

by skwid206 on Sep 27, 2010 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I could rec this a hundred times I could.

One of my biggest pet-peeves.

Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?

by Benne on Sep 27, 2010 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Totally agree.

That got ridiculous a little while ago, and it’s still going on. We are all big Hawk fans, that’s why we’re here.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

A real fan would never say that.

When I was a kid, we used to have to walk 20 miles in the snow just to watch the Seahawks.

by Culter on Sep 27, 2010 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hah! 20 miles in the snow?

I had two crawl thirty miles, uphill to QWest and uphill back home!

by Thomas Beekers on Sep 27, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I moved from Vegas to Seattle (1300 mile drive for the whole family)

Including a heavy storm with a tornado not too far away in California just to watch the Seahawks.

I win.

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I moved back from Colorado, where the girls are hot, the snow is powder and the sun is always out.

Milage is also around 1300. No family. You get points there. But you also don’t have powder.

I say it’s a push.

I tie.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 27, 2010 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I drove from Germany...

through the North Atlantic ocean. Had to leave in 1972 to get here in time.

I win.

by Kryten on Sep 27, 2010 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

I took a plane.

With alcohol on it.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 28, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

To elaborate

I really think this should be a zero-tolerance policy because it sets a tone for the blog. If you’re open to how people celebrate their teams, you’re going to be open to their opinions and beliefs.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

The magic word is "You."

That’s when a disagreement becomes an ad-hominem attack. “You’re not a real fan,” “You’re and idiot,” etc. That’s what needs to be policed if forums are to remain civil.

Seahawks Fans Cannot Be Cured

by TheLaird on Sep 27, 2010 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're an idiot

not, “you’re and idiot.”

But, yes, I agree.
However, I like to start all my post with something like “You’re all morons”…
Looks like I’ll have to change my posting habits.
(I hope you see I’m kidding.)

by Kryten on Sep 27, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah, totally agree.

There’s one way to not be a fan IMO, it’s by not following the team at all. It can get annoying when people seem to hope for badness but they’re still fans, just annoying ones.

by Johnny Slick on Sep 27, 2010 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

It does seem at times like guys feel that they have to present their fan-dentials before posting

So you’re wearing your Dave Krieg autographed jersey and can recite the names of all the players in the Ring of Honor and the guy you’re berating bought into the ’Hawks 5 years ago when the SB run made a splash… big deal! Do you want to measure dicks next?

Most of us just like to drink a cold beer or two and cheer for the Seahawks – that makes us brothers!!

by dassler10 on Sep 27, 2010 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I come here for you, John Morgan.

I rarely dive into the comment threads other than on draft day, but I read the site everyday. I know you’re not a god-like talent evaluator/team-building strategist, but you’re a dedicated, intelligent writer and I love this site for it.

by sammy on Sep 27, 2010 6:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Keep your chin up John!

Don’t post much, if ever, but I read every day. I’ve got to say I love the work you do John.. I don’t find myself thinking, “that John Morgan is insanely football smart,” or “that John Morgan is an idiot.” Most of the time I find your articles well thought and your opinions well articulated, not to mention the fact that the time you spend watching film shines through.

Basically just wanted to say keep up the good work, don’t take the garbage personally.

And for all the ‘Hawks fans who read and post… quit worrying so much about the past whether you agree or disagree, whether you were right or wrong… who cares? Let watch some ’Hawks… they’re winning the division at the moment!

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:07 PM PDT reply actions  

jacobstevens said it all.

Dogs are gonna bark. Let ‘em bark. In part it’s a reaction to the silly Morgan-worship on the site, which if I were you I would find as annoying as the animosity. But there’s nothing you can do about that.

Woof I say, woof!

inside of a dog it's too dark to read.

by shams on Sep 27, 2010 6:12 PM PDT reply actions  

I have to agree with John that things get way too heated here.

Game thread emotion is one thing, but too often that’s bleeding over into the rest of the site and that’s not acceptable.

We can do better.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

BRING BACK THE BITCH THREAD!

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I rarely read post game threads

I’m either annoyed and distracting myself from the Hawks until I cool down or celebrating and annoying the neighbors dog. Do they get edgy?

by illwillbli on Sep 27, 2010 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

that makes sense, cause I just read yesterday's and it seems pretty cordial.

I think I have he solution then. The Hawks just have to win the rest of their games and every superbowl until the internet becomes obsolete or John retires.

by illwillbli on Sep 27, 2010 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do think that FG shuts down an opposing viewpoint too harshly.

There are a lot of people that agree with what John says because John says it, in such a well reasoned and articulated way. Thus, you have John Morgan clones that will staunchly back anything John says even when he changes his opinion on a player or move. We need to realize that not every reader is a John clone. And we need to realize that those offering a differing opinion are not automatically stupid.

Another thing, most importantly: we need to greet a Seahawks W with joy and enthusiasm. I am appalled at what went on in the post game thread yesterday. It seems like a lot of readers are too caught up with winning beautifully that they can’t enjoy a win at all and that is just pathetic. We saw the most exciting game in YEARS yesterday, and what was the response? “The defensive scheme is awful”, “fire Gus Bradely”, “I’m so tired of Matt” and on and on and on……
Drop it and savor success. Worry about process later. We are 2-1, and looking like a favorite to go to the playoffs. After 4 and 5 win seasons! We have playmakers, damn exciting young and discovered talent.

Keep up the awesome work John, I hope you regain your fire for FG soon :)

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:16 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I honestly don't believe this is as bad as it's made out to be.

It’s when a dissenting voice gets overly defensive after a small handful of posters point out why that opinion may be flawed that things get testy.

The responsibility goes both ways. The regulars can’t pile on and the dissenting voice has to be less defensive.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying that the regulars are the only issue.

Both sides need to do better. I’m just saying that regulars play a role.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its hard to not jump behind John.

Because when he write a post about why “Max Unger Sucks” Its research and has a thought process behind it. Then someone on a whim writes a “Max Unger 4 Life” comment disagreeing with John but provides no actual support for his argument and won’t back down from that stance.

Its not disagreements – Its having support for your argument.

by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 27, 2010 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

no doubt about it...

Way too many arguments on here that degenerate this way… what makes it unbearable is that the articulate amongst the posters continue to try and convince those with no interest in real debate…

(I’d say this was my 2 cents… but I think I already ran out of change)

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

People here tend to respond to cliches poorly

It can be annoying to see someone attempt to refute a really well done piece of research by mentioning something about veteran grit or that the coaching staff must know something John or the rest of the community doesn’t.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think part of the tone issue is that some comments come across very blunt (something I'm probably pretty guilty of), which can be off putting if you're not familiar with the site.

I see lots of comments that people react very poorly too and it confuses me because I’ve seen the commenter and know where they’re coming from, but the person they’ve responded to doesn’t have that same understanding.

by Nate Dogg on Sep 27, 2010 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

You told me recently that I had no credibility

Because I had “met Pete Carroll once and fallen in love.” Frankly, that made me want to interact here less. When comments verge into the personal I tune out.

by lemonverbena on Sep 27, 2010 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh totally agreed.

I have many a time been a Morgan clone, as his writing has won me over. There’s a reason this site has such a following. And I see the frustration in the opposing argument having no reasoning. I just think that when that happens, we can be a little harsh. The community wants a response as well reasoned as John’s original thought (or the original thought of another poster) and that is often hard to do.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 27, 2010 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

What do you do? Groupthink exists everywhere.

And it’s hard as heck to combat. Another site I post at a lot also has a really bad problem lately with hazing newbies, and it’s supposed to be a site dedicated to skepticism.

by Johnny Slick on Sep 27, 2010 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Honestly I do believe this site is far nicer to new people than most online communities.

There’s room for improvement, but it’s not as bad as it’s often made out to be here.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've never seen poor treatment of newbies because they are new

I feel like criticism would have been the same for people who’d been here for years, but maybe some of the new people don’t quite have a feel for the unofficial etiquette..

by illwillbli on Sep 27, 2010 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Something that's occurred to me

Maybe we don’t do enough lighthearted stuff. Maybe all this emphasis on roster construction and strategy makes it so we’re all a little too serious.

by John Morgan on Sep 27, 2010 6:27 PM PDT reply actions  

I notice, for instance, off-topic posts die on the vine

which to me indicates people like something about Field Gulls, but as far as community, we’re not here to make friends.

by John Morgan on Sep 27, 2010 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Always assumed that those threads passed because

other than the Seahawks, our interests vary too greatly to talk about any thing else for too long.

If anything, the Game Threads are our off topic threads. There, the comments range from whatever commercial is on, to what beer is currently being drunk.

by Anticitizen_One on Sep 27, 2010 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I managed to get in the Great American Beer Festival on Saturday last weekend before watching the Hawks melt down in the heat.

It was a cool random thing on a Saturday in Denver that I hadn’t planned doing…

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 27, 2010 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

To be honest, at 60 bucks a ticket, you try to get in early and drink as much as possible to get your money back, lol.

I didn’t hit all places, but Oregon and Washington were well represented.

Most interesting beer of the day? Jalapeño infused. You had to drink another beer to wash down the beer it was so spicy. I didn’t take notes though, so can’t remember where it was from. Probably the southwest, but I can’t recall.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 27, 2010 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I want that beer, right now.

I’m dying with some of these beers that are so hoppy that they might as well be spicy.

by Anticitizen_One on Sep 27, 2010 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Marshmellow Beer

Thats my craving and thats why Im still yearning for this unicorn to be found.

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oops

I accidentally made some friends here!

Seahawks Fans Cannot Be Cured

by TheLaird on Sep 27, 2010 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not wuth lemon around

To make brilliant Big Balls picture threads.

But yeah, apart from the occasional quote/meme fest such as the Cccchhaaaarrrliieee period it’s usually very “why so serious”. We’re no KSK, s for sure

by Thomas Beekers on Sep 27, 2010 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we need more complimentary front page commentary from different people

I think the current video threads, pick your hawk etc. serve that purpose. I think it’d be cooler to see well written and reasoned analysis from other FGers. A featured FGer each week or something. That could help open up a dialogue for different opinions. I want as much JM as I can get, but this could be a good compliment that adds value and makes people feel more actively involved rather than passive reader. That way if you have a strong disagreement with something you know you can write it and maybe it’ll change some minds.

by illwillbli on Sep 27, 2010 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ouch!

That made me laugh, but do you really have to put Matt in with that particular group?

As a side note… I wonder if those four could form a decent grunge band…?

by HawkSoop737 on Sep 27, 2010 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Speaking of which, his MLS equivalent is part of a fanpost I'm working on at Sounder at Heart

Basically I’m listing a lot of things we’ve “accomplished” after 4 years in the same sense of accomplishment when a mentally retarded kid gets a D in his English test.

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh great I got to add him too

Toronto FC gives me headaches.

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Haiku posts from the past 2 weeks have been both lighthearted AND well-commented

I also enjoy the occasional DKSB post as well, which is usually more nostalgic than John’s work. I would encourage the regulars (myself included) to write more lighthearted-yet-Seahawks-related posts, and have the moderators boost more of the good ones to the front page (I think some people ignore the side bar and only comment on “front page” posts).

There’s already a lot of good work being done here on the Fanposts and Fanshots; I would just encourage more of it.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

More DKSB!

He always keeps things in a proper perspective, lighthearted and in your face fandom. I think if we all took ourselves as seriously as he does we’d be better off.

by lordtd on Sep 27, 2010 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's the Internet.

The community here is light-years ahead of anything else, and it’s the primary reason I stay. I don’t feel shouted down when I disagree, but I’ve seen others shouted down. Arguments over sports? Yeah, it’s going to happen. We all love the Seahawks at the end of the day.

by purplepansy on Sep 27, 2010 6:30 PM PDT reply actions  

There is, at times, a snarkish, mean spirited edge to the disagreements.

But there’s also great info, good humor and the best overall Seahawk read around. On this very site, and if this site went away it would diminish my enjoyment of the Hawks.

by broadbill birdwatcher on Sep 27, 2010 6:41 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Maybe all this emphasis on roster construction and strategy makes it so we’re all a little too serious.

I think this has a bit to do with it. To be honest, the John Morgan skill that draws us in is pulling apart the process to show what it looks like. So we come here to think critically about good and bad ways to construct a roster, or manage resources and evaluate the markets. Or read his book and learn more about being a fan of a team. Or read his scouting reports and learn a little more about what one person thinks are the overlooked skills of a player.

So the longer a person stays here, the more they change. It makes it difficult for new people to break in as it keeps evolving, and new people with a “less sophisticated” point of view, or lacking some of the knowledge we here think we know, get piled on as person after person tries to explain what they are missing.

I think how new people get treated is the worst part of this site, at least if I’m nitpicking one aspect of this thing I love so much.

I think people do enjoy showing off their arguing skills, and maybe it’s my military background but it’s no different people here in my everyday job. So it never really bothers me, because I personally don’t feel like it goes too far. I probably don’t have a good sense of empathy for how this impacts people.

Overall, I don’t get a chance to live and breath this site like some people, but I have very few problems with it.

by cashless on Sep 27, 2010 6:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Eh, I think the site is fine.

I like the insight into the team by a guy who definitely knows the game. I think to a point you can look at USSM for encouragement. Dave Cameron and Derek Zumsteg spent years pointing out how idiotic Bill Bavasi, to the point that they found themselves stuck saying “well, I am a Mariners fan so I sure hope Erik Bedard works out but god DAMN that was a bad trade”. Now they have an actual decent GM and those guys love him so much they can even embrace the process in a 100 loss season.

And football is way less statistically dense than baseball so you don’t get to go back and say “hey, the process is fine” when the results don’t quite add up. I think that overall things are fine. I think the sub-tense of this blog is not “Seahawks GMs are stupid” but “football is worth thinking about”. That’s definitely not a bad thing.

by Johnny Slick on Sep 27, 2010 6:54 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

the fact that.....

the site generates interest (positive and negative) is good. people are here, people are stupid,
BUT
people are here, lots of them, and more importantly…they are true fans, knuckleheads.

by Rundstrom on Sep 27, 2010 6:57 PM PDT reply actions  

You need earplugs to look at those uni's......

Jay Cutler…..most punchable face in the NFL?

7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!

by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 27, 2010 7:08 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Current or all-time?

Because the top 5 punchable face club of all time consists of John Elway, John Elway, John Elway, John Elway, and John Elway.

by Johnny Slick on Sep 27, 2010 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You forgot John Elway.

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by Tyler Jorgensen on Sep 27, 2010 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jay Schroeder

anyone? Or am I the only man who hates the Redskins here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCK7njbgDO8

Prepare for scare

"It's always a bad play when the other team scores." - John Madden

by jubelthebear on Sep 27, 2010 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jay Schroeder

anyone? Or am I the only man who hates the Redskins here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCK7njbgDO8

Prepare for scare

"It's always a bad play when the other team scores." - John Madden

by jubelthebear on Sep 27, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jim Plunket had a pretty punchable mug.

But you could beat him with a bat for days and nobody would notice.

by hazbro24 on Sep 28, 2010 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rivers is a close second

It was hilarious when Cutler and Rivers were basically swinging their purses at each other and spitting across the field at a game in Denver a few years ago…

by dassler10 on Sep 27, 2010 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I feel like we all sort of unite on gameday, for the most part.

I think some of the Tapp stuff is just stuff that happens. I don’t think Dave Cameron is ever going to be able to get away from the the #6org thing, a lot of people here (myself included) didn’t like that trade and now that it appears Seattle might win it people are going to say stuff.

You’ve been writing about the Hawks for a long time, John and your outstanding writing as gotten the site a lot more hits, unfortunately that means more people that have to let you know about any little thing you’ve missed or been wrong about.

I honestly don’t really know what I’m trying to say, I read Field Gulls everyday, I love it and love 99% of the people that comment here and I think we’re all good fans that get the nervous butterfly feeling every Sunday for the Seahawks.

by MFAN on Sep 27, 2010 7:08 PM PDT reply actions  

....more people that have to let you know about any little thing you’ve missed or been wrong about.

I think thats really common on sites like this. It’s kind of an alpha dog thing, where a new poster shows up and tries to be king of the hill by challenging John and the status quo. I know I did some of those things when I first found Field Gulls. Whats great about John and how he’s decided to run the site is having the patience to let those sometimes brash new commenters turn into good regulars.

by Nate Dogg on Sep 27, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

As a fan from out of town

 it is hard to get the info on my
Hawks that I crave. I believe that I have learned more about football in the last year since coming to this site that I knew my entire pre- fieldgulls life. Keep up the great work!

by J-Ram on Sep 27, 2010 7:13 PM PDT reply actions  

John, to answer your question about what I want from this site:

I just want you to keep doing what you’ve been doing all along. It really is a joy to read your content. TRULY!

I think that I take for granted the time and dedication that you have given to this site. I come here almost every day simply to read what you write, so please do not change when a small minority of people bite each other’s ass on a daily basis (it may seem bigger, but it really is a small contingency of us) or because of those who disagree with you or because of whatever reason that may be.

Your quality and content speaks for itself, and in my opinion is the gold standard for analysis and content. That’s what I want. That, and to continuation of the high standards of intelligent discussion about the Seahawks.

I regret that our behavior has cost you to lose some of the fire that you have in writing for Field Gulls. I hope that sooner rather than later, it is restored to you.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Sep 27, 2010 7:15 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

About fighting on the 'Net

John:

I spent the first 16 years of my career as a writer and journalist so, from a pro, let me say: Your writing and coverage of the Hawks is absolutely the best, most informed, enjoyable anywhere, period, and I read ’em all daily.

By the way, I’m the biggest and best and most diehard of all the Seahawks fan posting here, so the rest of you can just shut the fuck up about it. Thanks.

Seriously, a wise man once said, fighting on the Internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you’re still a fucking retard. So John, take heart and don’t let the flamers get you down.

Nobody pays attention to them. They’re sitting in mommy’s basement spanking the monkey 8 times a day and playing with their Star Wars action figures. Thank God they’re not out in public where they might actually hurt somebody. Fuck ’em.

Love the site, but seriously, lighten up dude! In the end, it’s just entertainment…and very damned GOOD entertainment at that. Don’t let a few assholes who couldn’t get laid in a whorehouse with $100s hanging out their pockets screw it up for you. 99.999% of this is fun and brings a lot of smiles and good feelings to a lot of people who really need it and use it.

GO HAWKS!!!

by BigUglyFatDude on Sep 27, 2010 7:29 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I'm not sure I agree with everything you said

But that was damn funny. And how did you know I love Bobba Fett?

by coug111 on Sep 27, 2010 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

As the author of one of the latest divisive posts

I want apologize for how my “Hasselbeck or Whitehurst” poll became failry hostile. I started the poll with designs on getting people to answer a question that ignored future strategies and focused on the here and now, which I concluded may be the better future strategy: too cute.

Without fully disclosing my purpose at the outset, there was really no opinion to disagree with or attack, so “the hive” attacked my logic. That I took offense to and freely fired back. I got to the point of finishing responses with snide remarks which was childish.

We do need to remember that this is a community and people often disagree. People often disagree more passionately than others as well. Those who tend to be more abravise (me) need to chill. Those who shy at the first sign of a disagreement need to grow a tad bit of brass.

Balance in everything. Great post John.

by 12thman on Sep 27, 2010 7:30 PM PDT reply actions  

I read some of the comments, I'll leave my own.

Sorry if it’s already been said.

I enjoy FieldGulls because of the intelligent insight and analysis, both by John and the community. On one hand, that is great achievement; not much on the internet can say that. On the other, it does seem to foster a mentality that “intelligent writing” is valued over all else. The person who is more well-written seems to feel entitled to a more valuable opinion.

I’m an English major myself, so I can probably do alright in this environment. But for people who struggle with writing, perhaps being blunt and abrasive is a way of being effective. Getting shot down because of this strategy only causes them to fight back bitterly. That is the way the internet works nowadays, sadly.

I’m not sure of a solution for it. I would probably place a larger responsibility on people already in the fold, so to speak, because of the influence they wield. With the Seahawks on the verge of having a successful season, more people will likely come, without the knowledge of what makes this site special.

Sorry that this whole thing has gotten you down. Hopefully the show of support above (and eventually below) me will remind you of the people who appreciate what you do.

by EvenAfter on Sep 27, 2010 7:34 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

This point has sorta passed by

But not from this angle, solid.

Dismissive attitudes rarely lead to constructive debates. Somewhere up above here there’s a discussion about how frustrating it is when people don’t support their argument. That is close to what you’re saying.

Is it a reasonable requirement to make of all posters? Maybe. Is it right to treat posters who do not or can not fit in this pattern? No. What’s the need anyway? Just leave the posts be if you don’t like em

by Thomas Beekers on Sep 27, 2010 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

John I appreciate the work you do and can't understand how your wife puts up with it

Cause it has to take a lot of time.
I come here to here some different oppinions and have lively discussions. I’m not affraid to disagree with the masses and don’t have a problem with those that do.
I try to make sure that I don’t post anything that I wouldn’t say to anyone of your faces and don’t say anything about a player that I wouldn’t say to them directly.
I don’t always agree or disagree with you, but I love talking and listening to you.

by stufr on Sep 27, 2010 7:38 PM PDT reply actions  

I think the best option if you're looking at contested topics

is to mention both sides of the argument, give an avenue for the dissenters to discuss and be untied by the team results. If you kind of don’t take a look at the people on both sides of the issues they will try and kick those doors open. this should be a place where we can learn the facts, but it also should be a place where we can as fans come together and understand our many points of view and how they relate to the team.

I’m not telling you to agree with the other side. Just let them know you may not agree, but can relate somewhat or want to understand their point of view.

On the other front. John, it’s just the sacrifice of public life man especially on the net. If you don’t want to have wrongness thrown at you, you probably should get out of this line of work man. You have a strong community that’s alive and stronger than ever and sometimes in order to bring it together you have to bring all the different parts together once and a while.

I don’t know how you could do this, but I hope my thoughts give you some idea of something if you’re worried enough to post an article. In the end, I’ll still come back to get your feelings on the offense because I know less about that then defense and I’ll still come back to see your poetry of post game wrap articles because win or lose I never feel cheated or like I’m reading something written without care.

by Joshua Kasparek on Sep 27, 2010 7:42 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll try and make a brief comment, but basically I don't see much of a problem.

You can’t avoid the occasional “trolly” poster, especially at a time when you have a mediocre team going through a complicated transition. I think the regulars here are a little quick to be blunt and absolutely too quick to be snarkily sarcastic, and honestly I find it kind of snobby and ugly. It doesn’t happen much, but I hate to see a new poster say something and suddenly be passive-agressively shouted down by a barrage of people that should know better.

I do it myself, admittedly, and hate it when I do. I’ll try to stop and be more judicious in my retorts to thoughts I think need more, uh, “development”.

But overall, I think the site is pure gold, and that opinion seems to be shared by the majority of outsiders that pop in. John and co. have done a wonderful job, we don’t really need to change much at all.

by djafrot on Sep 27, 2010 7:50 PM PDT reply actions  

This should be rec'd

Why don’t people appreciate one-liner jokes anymore?

Bandwagon leader for Michael Robinson as Seattle Seahawks starting QB.

by SSreporters on Sep 27, 2010 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM?!?!

Let me present a 10,000-word rebuttal that proves your comment is long and tedious.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Just love this place

Just the detail you post John, the things you catch, the strategy you post, the breakdowns and just plain awesome dialogue.

by Ratman44 on Sep 27, 2010 8:38 PM PDT reply actions  

It's all good

I think pleading for civility is a good move. Anyone who cares at all about FieldGulls should think about what John is saying and consider… I don’t know if there is an ultimate solution to what John is asking about short of Facebook for Seahawks fans.

Let’s face it:

1) No one likes to be wrong
2) Schadenfreude is a national past-time

I don’t agree with everything that John Morgan or anyone else opines about the ‘Hawks but some thinner-skinned people like to dig up old fights for the sake of saying “I told you so” or whatever, or they are hurt because someone made them feel dumb. That’s stupid

Personally I’d rather enjoy this win and dream of more Earl Thomas picks and the possibilities of Okung… and dare I dream for the playoffs?

And BTW I look forward to this site THE MOST every monday (or tuesday). FieldGulls and Smart Football are my fave football websites and Chris Brown just doesn’t post enough to satisfy my cravings (though that Boise State article was awesome). John Morgan brings it!

by booji on Sep 27, 2010 8:40 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I've been lurking around this site for over a year now

and have been overwhelmingly pleased with the intelligence and wit that is available on a daily basis.

John, you lead by example and it is noticed and appreciated.

I for one get the most out of the posts/comments where I can learn more about the details of the game. I like being able to watch a game with a more discerning eye… I ain’t all that smart, but you’re learnin’ me up purty good!

by dassler10 on Sep 27, 2010 9:11 PM PDT reply actions  

John Morgan, I want you to keep doing your thing.

(a) You’re a talented writer.
(b) Your arguments are well-researched and well-argued.
© I love that you’re willing to take a critical look at the Seahawks franchise.
(d) You’ve managed to create a forum for intelligent sports discussion—a truly remarkable achievement.

Points (a), (b), and © cannot be made for most sports writers. Point (d) cannot be made for almost anyone, period.

by ty540 on Sep 27, 2010 9:12 PM PDT reply actions  

I love that you copywrited your post.

I once tried to use the * to point out something, and by bracketing my text it turned bold. Where is this auto-formatting kept?

by cashless on Sep 28, 2010 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

As someone who has lurked for a while...

I can give you my perception: that dissenting opinions do get shouted down from time to time, and not just shouted down but kinda snarkily dismissed if the argument is unfounded or uninformed. I know this is a place for intelligent discussion, but my take is that dismissing the uninformed like that only tends to entrench them further in their opinions and in their determination to be right.

Of course, I also see the other side where people get defensive way too easily when their opinions are challenged.

I guess it comes back to individual responsibility. Dissenters should take it upon themselves to prepare for some resistance, while the incumbent folks on the board should really do their best to keep the snide out of their responses. It’s kinda like the whole “I don’t care who started it, I’m gonna finish it!” thing: the only way to stop a vicious cycle is for each person to attend to themselves.

And yeah, anyone who questions another’s fandom needs to just go away and quit taking football so seriously.

And by the way John, I do appreciate the work you put in. Sometimes I disagree with you, but that doesn’t reduce my enjoyment of the football knowledge and nitty-gritty details that I read here.

by Brandon8 on Sep 27, 2010 9:12 PM PDT reply actions  

It's a stressful time to be a die-hard Seahawks fan.

That’s where the fighting is coming from — there’s been so much roster turnover, so much change, etc. that the current state of the team is in total flux. Are the Seahawks good? You can make a case that they are, or that they suck, and both arguments have a dozen quality supporting facts and are totally rational and believable.

Fan opinion is bound to be all over the map for a while. The good news is, the true quality of the franchise’s new path will become more clear as the season goes on, opinions will converge to a more normal variance, and people will chill the fuck out as a result.

by sev79 on Sep 27, 2010 9:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Since this seems like the right place to do this,

I’ve always wanted to ask this, but have been afraid of being called a troll.

What qualifications does John Morgan have to evaluate nfl talent?

by tehbagel on Sep 27, 2010 9:31 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

None

He has pointed that out from time to time…but he articles are so well researched and thought-out that there’s not a need to for him to prove his credentials. What evidence does Mike Sando have, or Peter King, or most other football columnists?

You are free to disagree with John whenever you please…although some of us “Morgan Clones” might rise to his defense.

by J.L. White on Sep 27, 2010 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why is that important?

are Qualifications important for you when considering a blog?

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was just curious.

I never knew if these opinions were that of a former scout, a former pop warner player, or a fan like me.

Also, I must admit that the perceived tone of your response is what made me afraid to ask. I don’t read blogs outside of the Seahawks community, with exception of a couple of Mariners blogs (you can probably guess which).

by tehbagel on Sep 27, 2010 9:52 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Huh, I was curious as to why you were curious

Bi-curious.. I usually read blogs just cause its entertainment im not necessarily looking for an “expert” out of anyone. You shouldnt be afraid to ask that question, and Its in a way thats to the masses but why not ask John himself in a casual tell me about your self way, everything doesnt always have to be an argument

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gott admint,

I would have felt like a dick and easily able to be misinterpreted emailing and asking him outright.

I really hate to stir the pot, but I feel like these opinions were solicited by this post: A lot of people act like John is an infallible “expert”, which makes it hard to say otherwise, especially since I didn’t know what his degree of football knowlege was.

by tehbagel on Sep 27, 2010 10:10 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ready for it?

Orchid on white peak
the mass of Josh Morgan’s work
His toil qualifies

by BeaverBird on Sep 27, 2010 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Morgan IS Candy Mountain

Unicorn in thy Mist
Seahawk of Passion he is
Fan no other he be

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Damn its the thought..

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's fine to be a dick

As long as it’s in haiku form.
We need to remember that there’s a person behind each letter in every post. People need the approval of others.
Great football knowledge should be disseminated with civility.
When your engaged in verbal battle and you’ve already cut off a guys leg- don’t lob off the other one.
And for Christ sakes- stay away from his junk.

by BeaverBird on Sep 27, 2010 9:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Watch out when you call them special :D

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good stuff

You’ve got a dirty whorish mouth.

by BeaverBird on Sep 27, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Go fuck yourself, San Diego!!!

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

hear hear!

Because hitting someone with a haiku is like whacking them with a pool noodle… it’s annoying but doesn’t really hurt!

by dassler10 on Sep 27, 2010 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

stick and stones may break our bones

Pool noodle haiku
Will crush opponents spirits
Beaten souls can’t cheer.

by John Edwards on Sep 27, 2010 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

First of all... Don't you DARE lose interest in this John.

It would be a sincere waste of talent devoted to one of my life passions (Seahawks). I do have some input for what it’s worth.

There is combination of two posts above that I feel hit this nail on the head. The first one addresses the minority opinion becoming more and more aggressive, and the second (mentioned just above by Brandon8) is that the “collective majority” will tend to shout down those that disagree.

I have actually found myself at times “rooting” for the underdog position because of the voracity that the majority comes at them with. There is an informal indoctrination of thought that seems to become law when……

…….I don’t want to say this because I fear it comes off wrong. Please understand that I am trying to offer a potential root cause in an effort to solve a problem, and not intending whatsoever to impeach John’s obvious genius……..

…….There is an informal indoctrination of thought that seems to become law when you have analyzed something and published your findings. Your work is so thorough John that many take your very logically laid out thoughts as inflexible laws of nature. I don’t believe that even you would want people to do this. It lacks critical thinking on others parts. Unfortunately this mob mentality tends to cause those in the minority to anchor their positions even stronger. This may be a strong use of the term “mob mentality”, but can honestly say form someone who has felt this way that the feeling does come through for some (and not just the irrational uneducated).

I want to throw out an example to illustrate how a group can become polarized: Matt Hasselbeck.

I was one of those that was hoping to see the team go a new direction this off-season. A trade would have been ideal for me, but would have been only slightly more disappointed in a straight cut; however, I can’t help but find myself rooting for him to succeed every time I hear the “DIE MATT”, “FUCK MATT”, "MATT"S A PIECE OF SHIT" talk that fly’s every time he makes a mistake. I do not include you in this group John as your editorial has always been on the money and supported by data (not emotion).

I think we all get that Matt is on his last legs as an effective NFL QB. What really ruffles the feathers of many (in my observation) is that Matt is an all-time great Seahawk and for many die hard fans, deserves more respect than the “fuck you”. I speak only for myself, but feel that many confuse their right to freedom of speech and the consequences of doing so.

Does everyone have the right to vent? Absolutely. Do people have the right to call Matt a piece of crap? Again, Absolutely….. but others in this community need to realize that calling another man’s hero a worthless piece of shit is going to elicit an emotional reaction. This is coming from someone who was hoping the Hawks would go another direction at QB, so you can be sure I am trying to be as pragmatic as possible.

Again… for what it’s worth John. I’m not trying to placate you in saying that your work is on another level. Do what you need to do to get you head right with this community (that you’ve helped build), because your ass is needed right here!

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 27, 2010 9:58 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Just read the exchange from yesterday...and will add...

that sometimes people are just jerks. It weird that he mis-directed on John when the object of his rant was the posters that bashed him for his Tapp thoughts.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 27, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Holy crap, I just read that stuff from yesterday. That was cold.

Don’t let one jerk get you down John. We as the public are the problem with sports journalism. We want to know if something was good or bad and we want to know NOW. Truth is, we don’t know the future. Sometimes you get Tom Brady, sometimes you get Ryan Leaf. But since the public demands, the writers oblige. Then shocker sometimes writers turn out to be wrong. Then the public comes and jumps on your back and beats you down. But, if you use the knowledge you have to make postulations to your best knowledge about the future and turn out being wrong, I don’t think theres any shame in that. I wish I had 1% the football knowledge you do, John. And to all the naysayers, well you can have your money back. If you stopped writing here it would be a tragedy. Keep your chin up and GO HAWKS!

"Oh, the usual. I bowl. Drive around. The occasional acid flashback."

by the other side on Sep 27, 2010 10:02 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll say this much

I’ve been a long-time reader (although definitely not as long as a lot of the members), but I usually don’t even read the comments. I love the articles, play analysis, and breaking news. Sometimes, if there aren’t many comments, I’ll start to read them. But once they start getting too argumentative, I quit. I respect other people’s opinions and I’ll gladly listen to what someone has to say, but I hate when people are too stuck on an opinion to even look at the other side of the coin.

The very best thing about the Field Gulls community is the structure and rules/moderation system. I love the fact that people are intelligent, coherent, and willing to stay within the agreed-upon posting guidelines. I feel bad for you, Mr. Morgan, because I know what it’s like doing something that you love, but then having it become less and less enjoyable.

by Jackrabbit5683 on Sep 27, 2010 10:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks John

For all that you do. I like your commentary and appreciate all that you do.

However, unlike some of the fans on fg I will question some of what you say. I question teachers in school, pastors behind pulpits, Obama. Sure e’nuff, I’m going to question a well informed and highly publicized awesome writer as yourself John.

Your in the big time now John. As much are there are fans who love you, don’t be shocked to find people who jump on forums to whine, gloat, or hate. I guess it comes with the territory of being famous. hehe. famous at least in the local scene.

Please don’t leave us. Seriously your like the only blogger for the Seahawks. Forget that other guy who sold himself to write for expn.

If there’s one thing I learned about the internet since the old aol days. People love to show how manly they are by fighting online. Things that never occur in the real world anymore. But it will happen, expect it. Read it. Ignore it, remind yourself of the truth and press on.

Please dont leave. your random internet pal ….

by genax on Sep 27, 2010 10:14 PM PDT reply actions  

That other guy...

The longtime NFL beat writer who predicted an 0-6 start and 5-11 record? Who eviscerated management/ownership for the Mora firing?

Everyone—owners, CEOs, general managers, coaches, writers/media members and bloggers—is going to be wrong multiple times in their careers. Especially the case in the nature of sportswriting in the internet age, which encourages instant feedback and strong opinions to generate interest. At the bottom of the chain is the lowly internet commenter and his bastard stepchild the troll, who is always wrong.

by lemonverbena on Sep 27, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

If I can summarize my thoughts

I do believe there’s a bit of a pile-on mentality here, but I do not believe that it is as bad as many here have made it out to be. I’m part of numerous other online communities where the reaction to dissent is far worse than it is here. In relative comparison, Field Gulls handles dissent better than the vast majority of internet communities. I can’t help but feel you all are beating yourselves up a bit too much right now.

There is room for improvement. Regulars should avoid a pile on if they see that someone else has addressed what appears to be a dissenting opinion that could be contested. After the point has been made once or twice there is no need to continue further.

What I fear is getting lost in this discussion, however, is that the onus is not just on the regulars to promote civility. The dissenter or new poster must be prepared to back their assertions up with more than just cliches or deferrals to the coaches. Furthermore, they have to be prepared to be challenged. What often happens is that someone posts a dissenting opinion, a regular refutes it, and the dissenter immediately becomes overly defensive and snippy.

If you’re new, it would also serve you while to read the comments before posting for a while to get a vibe for the general feel around here. It may be tempting to jump in and post your thoughts, but if that’s a topic that has already been beaten to death people are going to get testy.

tl;dnr, responsibility goes both ways here, folks.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 10:19 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Or to put this another way

Everyone needs to be more aware.

If you’ve seen one or two people address a dissenting post or something a new person has posted sufficiently, lay off.

If you’re new, you might want to lurk for a few days to get a vibe for how the community works and what has and hasn’t been discussed to death.

If you’ve got an opinion that runs against the grain of the community, expect to get some resistance and expect to be challenged.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't see how your equal distrubution plan will change anything.

The dissenting voice is almost always a new/newer poster when the threads spiral out of control.

It’s the newcomer that gets defensive….but that is not the cause of the problem (in my opinion).

It’s the equivalent of saying your drinking problem and hangover are of equal blame. It’s the drinking that caused the hangover.

In my alcoholism analogy the dismissive snide remarks in rapid succession from Morgan-ites are the love of tequila and the combative belligerent newbie is the foggy shitty feeling you have in the morning. Both outcomes are predictable and deserved in most cases.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Situational awareness.

We don’t need thirty people piling on to a dissenting point. Usually someone makes a good counter-post fairly quickly. After that point additional refutations from the rest of the community aren’t needed.

Also, I’m getting pretty tired of seeing Morgan-ites and Morgan-Clones being thrown around as a pejorative.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Negative connotation

I support us using L. WASH in the Wild Hawk with Forsett and a little Tate.

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 27, 2010 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okay... got it.

It was certainly meant as it was taken so do with that what you will. I’m not alone in thinking that there are a few too many people riding John’s coat tails here and championing his opinions and research as their own.

It’s tiresome to read thread after thread where the same people belittle and torment anyone with lesser skills at writing or debate.

It’s almost like religion where things that are so clearly gray become a black or white.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I honestly do not believe that it is as bad as you make it out to be.

There is room for improvement, but Field Gulls handles dissent far better than just about every online community out there.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I'm not saying it is either.

I’m saying that the failure of civil discourse at times isn’t solely the fault of the “Morgan-ites”

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought I asked you not to use that term :)

I’m just of the opinion that we can only fix the problem internally. There is no way to preempt people from acting human when attacked.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dated a Morganite once.

 She wasn’t allowed to use a computer. Or a razor. No plucking either. I thought she was hot in that ankle length dress, white LA Gear tennies, and unibrow. I had to marry her. If only to get her out of that petticoat and tube socks. I was compelled to satisfy my burning curiosity. Thing is, she was pure Ewok. Fuck our kids are hairy. My son was born with full pubs, I shit you not. In conclusion, Morganites are bad news. Let’s not bring it up again.

by BeaverBird on Sep 27, 2010 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agree and Disagree

It’s meant to offend so I see your point.

It’s not an all angles assault from multiple people singling out one victim…. so it’s quite different.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I view this as a safe zone.

Everyone partaking in this thread has the same goal which is to improve the enjoyment for everyone that comes here.

I don’t think taking the gloves off in this arena is a bad thing. Sometimes family has to call it how they see it to fix a problem. I think of this like a much needed intervention (2nd drinking problem reference).

This is the first time it felt safe to actually voice my opinion on what I view a very real problem with my very favorite place on the internet. Forgive me if you playing this down sets me off a little.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I had to look up swaths....

I’m referring to only a handful. I don’t give a poo about the group think portion of the community. They are not the problem. Hell, I’m sucked into it 99% of the time.

If being called an over-aggressive Morgan-ite hits somebody reading this (in this thread) a little close to home well so be it. It’s not like a called anyone out by name. If they are part of the problem and now know it…well…..I’m glad nobody had to point any fingers.

If we lose John Morgan or have to drastically change the format of FG because this BS continues to go unchecked, that’s a problem.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can't speak for John but I believe that even in a thread like this there is a certain level of decorum expected.

These are those expectations

Specifically, this:

Name Calling: Except to call Scruffy “Lance”. He likes that. This has never been a problem here, but for the sake of comprehensiveness, let it be known that name calling of any kind will not be tolerated.

Deliberately trying to get under people’s skin to elicit a reaction isn’t going to help anything. If we’ve seen anything the last few months it only makes things worse.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not to belittle your point or concern but this is over the top.

I’ve said my piece… should I be reprimanded…. maybe.

Am I worried that I’m going to be viewed as a problem or that the “rule” you cite me for violating was drawn up for use in this instance…. no.

Do I think there will be backlash for speaking out against the vast swaths….probably.

Okay.... I'm in.

by The Manchild on Sep 27, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not a reprimand, it's for your information.

Name calling under any circumstances at any time is a no-no here. It’s listed as zero-tolerance because it never leads anywhere good.

by BrianL on Sep 27, 2010 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Excellent point BRIAN!!!

It isn’t about the fact that some follow what John says. The spirit of the phrase is meant to indicate someone who chooses to blindly follow another person’s opinion. It is irrelevant that it is John.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 27, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with what the above said

Excellence encourages man love and seems to foster a need to defend you John and this in turn makes the dissenter feel like such a cad that he gets out the verbal tanto and leaves his seppuku on the sand. John you are ok and the world gets a little ugly. Is what it is bro.

by canter on Sep 27, 2010 10:29 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm too drunk right now to make much of a cogent statment, but I love the community on this site

things may have changed a bit lately (I’ve been working two jobs and missing a lot of Seahawksness as a result), but overall this is the only website (news, sports, entertainment – anything) where I’ve felt the user comments actually ENHANCE the experience.

It’s not perfect and there is some jackassery, but I respect most of the other members of the community, and I’m heartened to see how we treat visitors from other team boards. That is all

by G'd Up on Sep 27, 2010 11:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Turn 'em off

At least for me, at least 90% of the value here is you, John. You can be selective on this, some (e.g. haiku thread) demand comments, but most don’t. I don’t need to hear (and don’t read) the vast majority of the “get my nickel in” stuff is not worth much. That goes for my note here, I guess.

by BrianF on Sep 27, 2010 11:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm here to learn about Seahawks football, have fun, and show some gratitude

First time poster here, long time lurker. I live in Phoenix, AZ (behind enemy lines, as it were). I enjoy the hell out of this site. I mainly come here to follow the games through our crappy internet connection at the bike shop where I always have to work on Sundays. The internet is so slow there I can barely follow the game on NFL.com, so it’s better to read the open game threads and keep hitting F5 whenever I get a chance. Most of you guys who post regularly here make the game so much more exciting than watching a score ticker or arrows across a fake gridiron. I thank you all heartily for that.

The internet brings out the worst in some people, and unfortunately this website is not immune to that element. It’s easier for me to ignore them than I imagine it is for Mr. Morgan. There’s a whole internet full of blogs just waiting for flame wars – it’s sad that people have to bring that infantile shit here. But, like a spoiled babies screaming for attention, if you ignore them, they eventually stop. Almost very flame war I’ve seen always ends in stupidity without resolution. Ignoring the blog brats works for me.

Finally, I come here to learn about football. Every game review or even off-season post offers something new for me to help expand my knowledge. It’s constantly humbling to realize how little I know, but it’s fulfilling to take the time to figure out what’s being said. Thank you John Morgan and crew for that. Please don’t stop this blog due to idiots and cowards. I look forward to contributing some insightful comments as I learn more about the game.

by hawks_mtbr on Sep 27, 2010 11:35 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Hey I think if you login you shouldn't have to hit F5 on game threads

It should automagically update the comments if you are logged in. Then hit “z” to scroll them or “Shift A” to mark them all read.

Also, great first post.

by Surf Hawk on Sep 28, 2010 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't post much ...

… but John, I think your writing is fantastic and that as a moderator I know you have to put yourself in the middle of this whole debacle. However, and I say this as one who has posted something that was received negatively, your arguments and discussion are never belittling or begrudging. That you have an opinion and you write as such helps make this site as great as it is. Please do not let the select few get you down because this site would not be as great as it is without your insight.

So … thank you for all your hard work! I know I am not alone in appreciating it.

by nut_house on Sep 27, 2010 11:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Absolutely

one can never have enough Whitehorses

Punks jump up to get beat down.

by Lo Pann on Sep 28, 2010 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know...

I mean, I understand that regular posters need to pile on less and be more respectful. I also understand that new posters need to work on being a little less defensive. Responsibility is important for everyone.

But I don’t think there needs to be a drastic change in the mentality of the posters. Challenging (in a respectful way) a new poster will allow them to logically formulate an argument. Those who can’t probably shouldn’t be making arguments. One of the reasons I like coming here is because it’s so based in fact and analysis that you need to think. If I have an opinion with basis in fact, I need to present it as such; otherwise I should be clear that it is my personal opinion.

The community standards seem to force coherent, critical thinking because it contributes greatly to every discussion. I love reading commenters who’s knowledge adds greater depth to the blog content. Much of it was borne because the regulars are continually setting the bar high for new posters. I’m happy with the intellectual standards set here (of course, everyone could be more civil and respectful about it) because they value analysis over all else. Posters (both new and old) are not blatantly shutting down each other, just disagreeing in a condescending tone. It’s a respect issue, not a hivemind issue. The hivemind has only been created because those we’ve all reached the most intelligent conclusion on many things.

by MT Olson on Sep 28, 2010 1:43 AM PDT reply actions  

As a relatively new poster

I’d like to say that the community here is one of the best ones that I’ve seen on the internet. I honestly enjoy reading the comments here, and this is probably the only place online where I can say that with honesty.

As someone who has done some writing about the Seahawks, I think that you do amazing work, John. The articles here are always well written, and I’m sure my girlfriend is continually annoyed by the number of times I mention this place when we talk about football.

It’s the one place I know I can go to for in depth analysis and for entertaining comments. I think there has been some trouble with trollish behavior, and I don’t really know how to fix it, other than to tell you, “Forget it, Jake. It’s Chinatown”, and leave it at that.

I will say that I have never felt unwelcome here, and I do think as a new poster my own general rule has been to lurk (I’ve been lurking here for well over a year) until I got a feel for the place.

Ultimately, this has become my absolute favorite place to come for reasonable and interesting discussion and debate about my favorite team, and I just wish other fans had it this good. I hope this place doesn’t change too much.

by splintrdmind on Sep 28, 2010 1:51 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I started over at the PI forum back in 08 and eventually it became too much for me so I moved here. I do feel this is an important point as well.

I found FG and have felt blessed ever since. I love the articles from everybody (Morgan, DKSB, lemon, ss, etc.) and I love the community. It is the only place I can engage in thoughtful discussion about football. I’ve noticed when discussing Seahawks or Mariners with people outside of FG and Lookout Landing, I am often met with an argument. People tend to focus on the negative and once they have a set opinion about a certain player, they will not change their minds. When Aardsma has a bad game or two for the M’s, suddenly he’s lost it and should no longer pitch for us or when Branch has a severe injury that happens to many athletes, he is “always injured,” and “doesn’t really care.”

Human nature is to react and in sports it is immediate because everything happens so fast. I quote John Morgan, Jeff Sullivan, Matthew Carruth, Dave Cameron, and other articulate and analytical writers because I know that they are putting aside reactions for the most part and actually looking a the big picture. They are putting effort and thought into their writing and therefore I take it seriously. I then go back and look and most of the time, I end up seeing what they stated. So when someone who bases their opinion on either always trusting the Front Office or their own judgement on a play or two without any analysis, states an opinion altering from the “hive mind,” I disagree with them. I suppose this makes me a “Morgan-ite,” but I do not see this as a slanderous term. I see it as misjudgement. If John wrote an article titled “Player A Sucks” and had no explanation why, I would not go around stating that opinion just because John stated it and I do not believe anyone else here would either. I am not a blind follower, I just repeat good analysis when I read it.

Sorry, this ended up much longer than I planned but BrianL is right, it is not as bad as some make it out to be. Lookout Landing is actually a bit meaner and that’s not meant as a slight, it’s just the personality there. I love it, I love the sarcasm especially, but it is not for everyone and many people get defensive. So I’ll repeat the call for civility. Do not pile on or have blunt responses. Every reasonable challenge should be given a reasonable answer and every discussion should be just that and not an argument.

by Hopefulmsfan on Sep 28, 2010 3:10 AM PDT reply actions  

People take and make things personal when they shouldn't.

If I have the opinion that Whitehurst should start over Hasselbeck, I should be able to say so without being called names (not that I have), or in any way attacked personally. If someone replies to my post and says, “FAIL”, or “idiot”, or “you’re not a true fan”, that is just an unnecessary attack. If someone replies and says, “Hasselbeck has the experience to call effective audibles and Whitehurst doesn’t”, then I have no reason to be offended.

Personally, I will always be an open minded fan with a tendency to be optimistic in regards to changes. I like to see players play and coaches coach before I arrive at my opinion of them, but once I do, I’d like to be able to state my opinions without being attacked by fellow fans.

I’m not here to prove anything, I’m not looking for recognition, and I’m not looking for a fight.

I’m here for analysis, news, and the exchange of opinions between Seahawk fans.

That being said, I think we go 8-0 at home this year, beat st. louis, oakland , and tampa bay on the road and end up 11-5.

Go Hawks.
 

by grinch11 on Sep 28, 2010 8:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Many of these arguments have no "right answer"

and much of the evidence for either side is subjective and bound up in emotion. This doesn’t mean that no one should talk about it, but it does mean that people should be hesitant to write in absolutes or to be dismissive of opposing arguments.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Sep 28, 2010 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lilliputs vs Brobdingnagians

Passion vs Logic
Coke vs Pepsi
Democrats vs Republicans
Thesis, Antithesis, Purgatory
Donuts Death Cab
Gestalt

by ThunderHawk on Sep 28, 2010 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

An example

As nearly everyone has noted, John Morgan does an outstanding job on this site. As for the view of an unwelcoming atmosphere on Field Gulls, please see this example: http://www.fieldgulls.com/2010/9/28/1717419/one-of-the-most-brutal-beatings-a-defensive-end-clemons-has-ever-put
I was in no way trying to say that the ridiculous rating system at PFF has any merit, I was merely sharing what I thought was an interesting viewpoint on the Seahawks performance in the Chargers game.

by jpd2d on Sep 28, 2010 2:52 PM PDT reply actions  

But I commend Vasilii for apologizing

He didn’t really have to. I just want people to be able to post interesting information that pertains to the Seahawks without feeling like an idiot (which I felt like after Vasilii’s initial response). I can take the criticism, but is it really necessary?

by jpd2d on Sep 28, 2010 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

You could have afforded to be a little less sensitive.

Vasilii brought up some very valid concerns about that link.

by BrianL on Sep 28, 2010 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

See my response on the FanShot

It doesn’t help that when someone is trying to point out the issue of concern for this post by John, they are then accused of being too sensitive. I only made an issue out of it because of this post by John. I would have just ignored Vasilii’s response.

by jpd2d on Sep 28, 2010 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

No. Brian.

I think jpd2d has a very good point here (and I am speaking conceptually here… not taking umbrage with Vasilii)

…the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th comments were analytically good points. The first one however, called jpd2d’s source “bullshit”…. and encouraged him to never bring that source here again.

I assure you that if I called any of your sources bullshit and asked you to never bring them here again…. I’d get one of those red warnings on my screen saying I was being combative.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 28, 2010 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know cause I have gotten several for this exact type of response.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 28, 2010 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

So we're hung up on the use of the word "Bullshit" ?

Vasilii wasn’t attacking the poster, he was attacking his assertion that PFF does good work. These are two completely separate things.

Vasilii didn’t say that the poster was full of bullshit, he said that PFF was full of bullshit.

Please, be less sensitive everyone. I don’t want to have to play language police and make FG a sterile environment.

by BrianL on Sep 28, 2010 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Clearly no one was offended by the word "bullshit"

It was the tone and the message that was offensive and rude. Never once did Vasilli address the content of the linked material. He only talked about how horrible the site was and that no one should ever link to it. I’m not even sure that Vasilli visited the link, yet he mounted a multi-comment diatribe against it and the idea that anyone should ever suggest that it might be interesting.

iverson2169, on the other hand, was offended that he had received explicit warnings or threats of a ban for a similar message, making this something of a double standard.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Sep 28, 2010 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

This topic is pretty well exhausted.

Iverson2169 has been issued exactly two warnings for behavior that was far beyond what Vasilii did.

None of the mods have the time to play the role of playground police to ensure no one’s feelings get hurt. Vasilii’s initial response was a touch harsh but the response he got back was way too oversensitive.

Everyone needs to lighten up. It goes both ways here.

by BrianL on Sep 28, 2010 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

4 replies is an exhausted subject?

For the record, I was suspended for “not dropping a subject” (in which I was acting respectfully). I still had points to make and felt it was not right to be “gaffled down”. I was still contributing new information and presenting it respectfully (like I am here).

I want to address your question: "So we’re hung up on the use of the word “Bullshit” ?"

No, and this isn’t about Vasilii. This is a thread started by John asking why people become confrontational. This isn’t a thread about assigning blame. It isn’t about right and wrong. This should not be a thread where a mod deems that he’s heard enough of this topic and has proven himself right. That kind of phraseology is exactly why people get bent.

“Your being to sensitive” is not a solution, and does not attempt to understand the root causes.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 28, 2010 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

This goes both ways.

It’s more than just harsh responses to perceived voices of dissent. It’s people acting far too defensive when they are challenged as well.

Never in this thread have I said that the FG community as a whole is fine and people should just suck it up. I have said that both sides need to be more aware.

by BrianL on Sep 28, 2010 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Then you are most certainly correct.

I subscribe to this as well. I must have misread your meaning. Thanks for the clarification.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 28, 2010 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Noted Brian.

The actual site terminology regarding “not being allowed to post” eluded me. I wasn’t trying to use misleading phraseology.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 28, 2010 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is there somplace else you guys can do this?

A new reader following this would probably turn the channel. You’re cutting into my porn time.

by BeaverBird on Sep 29, 2010 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred
Horsey_small
What Doug Baldwin Had to Say About Seahawk QBs (or How DB Throws MF Under the Bus)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies