Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

Major Minor Moves of the Off-Season: Brandon Mebane on the Weak Side

Everyone sick of discussing roster moves? I know I am. Everyone ready to talk football? Good lord do I know I am.

Long time readers know I am crazy about Brandon Mebane. Here's a story about Brandon Mebane.

Mebane was a three-tech in college and a good one. He broke in with Seattle by filling in for an overtaking and making expendable Chuck Darby. Darby was a one-tech, but a Tampa 2 style one-tech. He was quick off the line and had active hands and did not anchor very well but did provide pass rush from a position teams rarely wring pass rush from. Mebane was Darby but better in almost every conceivable way. As an added bonus, the bulked-up Mebane proved pretty damn hard to move and so he became a quality anchor too.

What Mebane does is pretty simple: He is quick, strong enough and hard enough to block to force consistent, almost persistent double teams. Unlike most defensive tackles in the NFL, he survives and can even split a double team. Simple but rare and a huge boon for his surrounding teammates. A pass rush is typically four on five. Mebane accounts for two.

Jim Mora moved Mebane back to three-tech. This was described as his "natural position" because he had played it in college. This is where the story gets interesting. Mebane was a three-tech at California and despite his great play at the position, scouts thought he was too slow, too stiff and not explosive enough to play three tech in the pros. And there is some truth to that. Mebane is not Kevin Williams or Jay Ratliff. And as it turned out, Mebane had his worst season as a pro under Mora.

Part of the problem was Mebane's pairing. He was teamed with Cory Redding on the left and Redding was, in many ways, another Brandon Mebane. It was never really clear if Mebane or Redding was supposed to be the playmaker, but neither really turned out to be one. Redding didn't free Mebane and though Mebane did free Redding, Redding was a tackle playing end.

Part of the problem was that Mebane showed the same ability to explode into the backfield and disrupt runs and pressure passes, but as scouts anticipated, he wasn't really what you want in space. Quarterbacks could anticipate and outlet or roll out. Running backs could evade him. All those pre-draft concerns about his closing speed and agility proved correct, kind of.

Pete Carroll has quietly fixed the Mebane dilemma. Mebane is no longer a three tech, necessarily, though he will start most snaps over the three gap. Mebane is now an under tackle and that is a subtle but potentially major change. Whereas before, Mebane was freeing Redding and though Redding was good, he wasn't doing much with the single block and space given, Mebane is now freeing a light, quick, explosive pass rusher.

Mora's front four broke down in two places. As mentioned, neither Mebane nor Redding could take advantage of the single blocks the other provided, but also, and perhaps more importantly, putting Cole at one-tech and typically on the right, meant Seattle's right defensive end was fighting through multiple blockers on most snaps. Patrick Kerney and Darryl Tapp were facing double teams and long edges and chip blocks and all sort of other garbage you do not want your best pass rusher to face.

Carroll has paired Seattle's best defensive lineman and the lineman far and away best able to force a double team with the team's best pass rusher. Check out Chris Clemons schooling Michael Roos. Check out Chris Clemons schooling Bryant McKinnie. What unites both plays? Mebane drawing a double team and isolating the tackle against a quicker, more agile pass rusher. And which game was Clemons most absent? Week three, when Seattle started Craig Terrill at under tackle.

It might seem minor. It certainly has been overlooked. But starting Mebane on the weak side and allowing him to create favorable matchups for the Seahawks Leos will pay dividends all season, and every season for as long as Mebane is a Seahawk.

Comment 96 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Love the caption and photo.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Sep 7, 2010 3:38 PM PDT reply actions  

When are we gonna be able to buy this guy's jersey already?

Once all the Housh jerseys are off the racks they should have space.

by Alec_Mac on Sep 7, 2010 3:47 PM PDT reply actions  

You can also go to the pro-shop by the stadium

And it takes them about a half hour to make whatever jersey you want.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 8, 2010 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

For serious?

That’s awesome! Does that apply to the Authentic ones too (as if I could afford one)?

by Cannonater on Sep 8, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

I doubt it.

The cheap-o (ha! ‘cheap-o’) jerseys are iron-on, hence the expediency.

The authentic ones are sewed on, so I don’t think they do those. I could be wrong, though.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 8, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very informative and

I feel that ol optimism kicking in. Here’s to winning the “slugfest” Sunday.

by broadbill birdwatcher on Sep 7, 2010 3:48 PM PDT reply actions  

I was just wondering about all this

Well at least Carroll isn’t Jim Mora. He seems to know how to use talent wisely and who the weak points are. Hard to tell until the season starts, but I like.

by B.B.Finnegan on Sep 7, 2010 3:56 PM PDT reply actions  

This is heartening analysis

And I hope Mebane and Clemons or Brock see some level of success as a pair.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 7, 2010 3:57 PM PDT reply actions  

San Fran Success

I predict a Clemons tornado on Davis this weekend. Mebane and Clemons should shine against confused rookies on the road.

Fly Leon! Fly!

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 7, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually he'll be blocked out by Vernon Davis who will still be able to release into a route and be a threat the whole game.

I consider the 49ers a substantially better team and anticipate a good distance in wins between us & them at the end of this year. As in, 7 wins to their 10-11. But actually I expect this game to be close, and it’s winnable.

by jacobstevens on Sep 7, 2010 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Clemons will still mainly be lined up on Staley's side though, right?

Davis will probably chip Clemons a bit then release into his route, but it will be Clemons vs Staley for the most part, correct?

by MFAN on Sep 7, 2010 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was speaking facetiously since we'd seen teams motion the TE to switch strong/weak sides after our Leo lines up on the weak side.

But I don’t know, to be honest. I saw the Leo at 2, 3 & 4 point stances, often nothing different in play from a DE except that the size is supposed to be small — like I can understand going with a talent like Freeney in spite of his size, and I can see favoring speed over size and recognize that mostly they are opposing factors, but if smaller=faster is all that there is to the Leo position, it’s kind of dumb, isn’t it? I mean it’s kind of turning your strategy into your goal — but as a weak side player Leo was lining up against LTs and RTs.

So I still expect him to face Staley more, like you say, but I don’t know for sure because I’m waiting for a regular season game to see if the system is going to be more like a 3-4 in terms of play-calling, who is sent in on pressure, or if it’s going to be like preseason looked: a 4-3 with a small end and a big-ass end.

by jacobstevens on Sep 7, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Strong/Weak

I cant see our coaches not reacting to this. I would think we would game plan around the tight end motioning but thats just me. I know teams are usually set before they motion the tight end but even high school football we would adjust to the strong and weakside on the defense in this case it will be interesting to see what the coaches do during a real game. I a couple of games we would blitz the linebacker right at the tightend and send the faster player inside. The Offensive tackle expects help but the smaller player bolts inside and then the Linebacker catches the Tight end trying to chip and knocks him sideways so he never releases into his route… that said the NFL is far different, with different athletes but I cant believe are coaches are just going to get abused cause we have a smaller end on the weakside, or maybe I am an idiot and the leo is only is successful situationally or you need the right player who can compensate.

Fly Leon! Fly!

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 7, 2010 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Linebacker blitz

When they motion the Tight End to the weak side our smaller LEO could be able to cover his route and have the strong side LB blitz the QB

The future is looking better

by eohawkfan on Sep 8, 2010 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Zone Blitz

I think I have seen Clemons actually do the Zone Blitz and I am not opposed to it, its creative. I only have one peice of footage in my head so far of Clemons being Juked by Adrian Peterson on his on long run of the game in the pre-season, but what linebacker hasnt been juked by AP

The whole Idea I think behind the Leo is to try and create in inbalance in your favor, if the offense adjusts you have to adjust and audible… You will hear some expletives on my end, if they dont protect clemons when they motion to the Weakside with tightend or run counters/traps

Fly Leon! Fly!

by BleedGreenandBlue on Sep 8, 2010 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

They'd have to be idiots to not have some kind of coutner measure

I expect them to. Or at least by a game or two into the season if they keep getting gouged by it.

by B.B.Finnegan on Sep 8, 2010 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

It'll be cool to see Davis on Davis.

In garbage time if nothing else.

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Sep 8, 2010 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wonder...

…if PC has ever visited fieldgulls. Chances are that he will, if he hasn’t already. And I am sure John & Co. never let up knowing that someday, their insight could impact the psyche of the brain-trust of the Front Office. Or maybe thats just me being optimistic. Anyway, keep it up guys, this gets me through my workday…

by Rundstrom on Sep 7, 2010 4:00 PM PDT reply actions  

I hate myself for it but I can't help but look ahead.

Brandon Mebane will be Robert Quinn’s best friend in 2011.

by Hawkhammer19 on Sep 7, 2010 4:06 PM PDT reply actions  

how can you speak such sweet words

knowing that it will only be a tease for now :(

From The Hawks Nest

by Hancock.Brett on Sep 7, 2010 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

kick ass article

Given that there’s not much of a talent difference on the d-line from last year, I was wondering how Carroll hoped to improve the pass rush.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Sep 7, 2010 4:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Rec'd for truth!

Though they sink through the Sea, they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion...

by Cheddar28 on Sep 8, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okay, so I know the paragraph where you lost me...

It was this one:

Pete Carroll has quietly fixed the Mebane dilemma. Mebane is no longer a three tech, necessarily, though he will start most snaps over the three gap. Mebane is now an under tackle and that is a subtle but potentially major change. Whereas before, Mebane was freeing Redding and though Redding was good, he wasn’t doing much with the single block and space given, Mebane is now freeing a light, quick, explosive pass rusher.

Please to be explaining a bit more, because I damn sure thought that 3-technique and under tackle were the same thing. What are the differences in typical alignment for an under (and any subtle variations that Carroll prefers) and a “Tampa style” 3-technique?

"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin

by dcrockett17 on Sep 7, 2010 4:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Three refers to the guard's outside shoulder.

It is neither left nor right; strong side nor weak side. Mora played his three on the defensive left, opposite the offensive right and that also typically is the strong side. Quinn wanted a big strong side end, just like this year, and that means Mebane played beside Redding for most of the season.

Mebane isn’t really a three any more. He is an under tackle, and under this sense means opposite the weak side. That means Mebane and Clemons will be playing the same side.

by John Morgan on Sep 7, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

"opposite the weakside"

Do you mean "on the weakside? Because if Clemons is the weakside DE, Mebane should be the weak-side DT.

I know I’m just getting caught up in jargon, but either you said that incorrectly or you have a definition to add to my understanding.

by cashless on Sep 7, 2010 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

4 3 over vs 4 3 under

So basically mora ran a 4 3 over and Carroll runs a 4 3 under…nt on strong side in 4 3 under and plays the weak side on the 4 3 over? Plus the under allows the sam/curry play on the Los

by Davis Hsu on Sep 7, 2010 5:53 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Gracious

got it now

"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin

by dcrockett17 on Sep 7, 2010 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

When you say 3 gap, I think you mean B gap.

Mebane’s lethergic results after switching to 3-tech never made sense. This feels like a small awakening.

by jacobstevens on Sep 7, 2010 4:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Rec'd

By someone who clearly understands pictures better than words!

Really useful – thanks

by JamesMurphy on Sep 7, 2010 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great illustration

How come I never hear of 2 gap or 4 gap, just no reason to sit on the outside shoulder?

by Surf Hawk on Sep 7, 2010 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ah, something else I didn't know.

I was in the midst of responding and asking but I see your answer, it just decided to float up there.

by jacobstevens on Sep 7, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't it be great

If the FO would offset all this unsettling roster churn with a Mebane extension?!

I can dream!

It is what it is...

by kidder95 on Sep 7, 2010 4:33 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

ideally

that’d be every week ’cept the bye right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Sep 7, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope it's the week we send Hawthorne, Tats, Curry & Davis

to pressure the QB on about 18 snaps. Not all at once, of course (insert John Marshall joke here).

by jacobstevens on Sep 7, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

man nothing unites the Seahawks fans

like a good John Marshall rip or a good Largent praise…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Sep 7, 2010 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Once again Mr. Morgan

I am smarter for having read your scribblings. Great insight.

by TrueHawkForLife on Sep 7, 2010 4:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Regarding this and for anyone that has the game recorded

Listen to Colin Cole rebuff when Moon says Red Bryant should battle to a stalemate. Cole talks about setting the edge. It’s a display of the football intelligence that got him signed. Think it was the Vikings game.

by John Morgan on Sep 7, 2010 4:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Does Red Bryant shortening the edge by demanding double teams give more chances to blitz pressure getting home?

Dexter Davis and Aaron Curry allow for drooling when drawing up blitzes but is this even a reasonable hope?

by Joshua Kasparek on Sep 7, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

This move probably saves his career

watching him he just seemed so body awkward at DT at times I felt kinda bad for him. If he succeeds here that would be great for him. It’s a lot easier to see Carroll is trying to work to a players strengths rather than putting what has been a square peg in a hexagon.

by Joshua Kasparek on Sep 7, 2010 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

is that what worked so well on the Lofa blitz against the Vikings?

It’s been so long since I’ve seen a LB run inside the OT and be completely untouched on the way to the quarterback.

From The Hawks Nest

by Hancock.Brett on Sep 7, 2010 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

We seen it all last year

We were just on the offensive side at the time!

The future is looking better

by eohawkfan on Sep 8, 2010 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I noticed that too!

I Rec’d Cole’s comments

I Bleed Blue and Green

by DSAhawker on Sep 8, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm glad this got pointed out.

Both of the plays you mentioned by Clemmons stuck out to me for the very same reason. MeBane! forcing the guard to collapse down gave clemmons the space he needed to outpace the recovery from the tackle. Great post as usual John.

by timlin45 on Sep 7, 2010 5:05 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Maybe, but it takes speed and an outside threat for an inside move like that to work so well.

I’d guess that his outside game is more threatening to a tackle than we’ve noticed so far, and that it’s respect and an overcommitment to that outside that brought us those two inside beauties. Probably both of those pro bowl tackles are good enough to neutralize the outside against him, while exposing themselves for a countermove.

Or he lulled them to sleep with the same move 3 times in a row, and then busted out the inside move. Tough to really know for sure without seeing him out there more.

by cashless on Sep 7, 2010 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks

A great article with wonderful insight.

by manlyhanley on Sep 7, 2010 5:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Good to see that Mebane will be unleashed

to fulfill his maximum destruction potential.

It's Great to be a Florida Gator!

Here's hoping this is the offseason that Craig Terrill is finally released.

by Wayward Llama on Sep 7, 2010 5:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Mebane split doubles twice on goal line stands

…ended up in the backfield and tracked the RB down both times.

I think we saw a lot of plain vanilla during the preseason because no matter what PC said, he was heavy in talent-evaluation and also understands the edge he can have in the first game by showing as little of his hand as possible for Week 1’s opponent to study (anyone else think Hass is throwing to Carlson once a game?).

Great article John! I’m a big Mebane fan too, and after the success he had before Mora took over, I had a major “Oh, shit!” moment when Mora decided to “improve” him by the change you cited. When a young guy like Mebane is kicking butt and taking names, NEVER screw with him!

I’m also amazed at how well Red at end is working out. I knew he was strong and fast and mean, but I didn’t realize how much his length was hurting him inside until I saw him at end. He’s in the backfield on every play, and I still haven’t seen a tackle handle him one-on-one.

Like Schneider said: Bigger, stronger, faster and more talented! Go Hawks!

by BigUglyFatDude on Sep 7, 2010 8:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Simply put: Excellent observation, John.

I hadn’t thought of it that way. I’m glad you pointed it out.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Sep 7, 2010 10:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I wonder: Does this pairing allow for quicker execution by the linebackers when they are blitzed?

Some people like creative blitzes, but I find that I don’t care for it so much as I care for well-executed blitzes.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Sep 7, 2010 10:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Mebane is honestly one of the few players

I’d be upset with if they traded.

Punks jump up to get beat down.

by Lo Pann on Sep 7, 2010 10:36 PM PDT reply actions  

ummm

Trufant anyone?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZDUh9yboqI

Your culture is primitive; yet so funky!

by jubelthebear on Sep 7, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tru , Tats , Carlson and ...

Really that’s about it.

Tru and Tats are kind of on a short list for me though they’ve had a few down years due to injury and if they keep that up my list may shorten.

Punks jump up to get beat down.

by Lo Pann on Sep 7, 2010 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okung or Earl Thomas?

I’d be pissed if they traded them because then I’d realize they “trading everybody up in here”, not just guys from the last few regimes, but there own.

by Surf Hawk on Sep 7, 2010 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think I stole the bed intruder quote from a prevous commenter

It was a few days ago and was so brilliant I thought it to be my own. Thanks for loaning it.

by Surf Hawk on Sep 7, 2010 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

My goodness. I hope they make it a priority to re-sign Mebane.

Guy is just too good to let walk. If Clemons or Brock have any success, it should be attributed to Mebane’s performance.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 8, 2010 7:38 AM PDT reply actions  

One of the best posts I've read

John, thanks for this write-up. This might be the best example I’ve seen of your ability to pair Seahawks love with Football 101. Actually, this might be upper-division. It’s really helpful, as have been your frequent explanations of things, in passing, such as the way language has to shift when talking about distinct offensive or defensive schemes—to wit, the need for different terminology to describe line positions when switching from 3-4 to 4-3.

So I was wondering, can you recommend one or more good books that really talk X’s and O’s in an analytical way? Preferably something that gives some context, too, about the genealogy, if you will, of plays, positions, and offensive and defensive schemes. If not, there’s a good candidate for your next book. And by the way, folks, Everett Public Library will soon be carrying four copies of John’s book. By all means, buy your own, too.

by dagraham on Sep 8, 2010 10:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"

Recent FanPosts

Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Small
Could Dre Kirkpatrick be the key to our 2012 draft?
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
Seahawks QB Situation: Not a Defense for Tarvaris Jackson
Small
Team Needs - The National Perception of Seattle
Small
2012 Mock Draft, Version 1.0
Walshrun_small
Super Bowl XLVI Reaction: New England Patriots
Small
My Friend has a Friend who works for Nike...
208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad
Beast_mode_tshirt_small
Tats Comeback Attempt?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Easleystreet2_small ChadDavis45

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill