Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 NBA All-Star Game Starters Announced

The Four Seasons of the Seattle Seahawks

This is not a prediction. It's a broad projection on how this season might progress.

0-4 Wins

Seattle's offensive lines proves a total disaster. A bad unit from 2009 is in fact worse in 2010 without one of its best members: Rob Sims. Russell Okung struggles with injuries all season and is either absent or debilitated and either way, left tackle suffers. Matt Hasselbeck takes his knocks and that brings out the worst in him. Not only is he banged up but his does not have a pocket to consistently step into and between the two, Hasselbeck is every bit the fool-brave, noodle-armed, compulsive check down artist that the Green Bay Packers defense laughed at last season.

Justin Forsett and Leon Washington prove just as incapable of running through walls of defenders as Julius Jones, and rather than aid or overcome the terrible pass offense, the run games proves equally as liable and disastrous. Charlie Whitehurst steps in because of injury or ineffectiveness or a combination of the both and is overmatched by game speed, confused by regular season coverage schemes, sacked into oblivion and picked back into miserable reality.

The defense fails to generate rush and the secondary is always cleaning up, never preventing completions. Seattle forces an occasional third and long through the power of their run defense, but those thirds are converted and that run defense is deadly in spurts and like wet tissue paper off left end. Injuries to often-injured players mount and a few new names join the bunch. By season's end, Seattle is weeks into the process of figuring out what remaining young talent will contribute next season, sadly aware that there isn't a ton, and not sure whether to give Whitehurst snaps or save face with the no better, but less embarrassing Hasselbeck.

Star-divide

Olindo Mare is Olindo Mare plus a few complications. His field goal percentage wavers and some of his low, line-drive kick offs that teams formerly took for touchbacks are returned and for very good yardage. Jon Ryan has another solid season for punt length, but returners receive with a clear field and blocking and all that superficial distance is lost in a blink as long punts became longer returns.

5-7 Wins

Okung returns and shores up the left. He may not be All-Pro, but he's capable and capable is startlingly better than anything Seattle managed in 2009. The interior line is so-so. It generates room against inferior tackle combinations but is blown back and broken through by tougher defenses. Hasselbeck is hot and cold. He develops chemistry with Mike Williams and the two prove decent enough at moving the chains and converting red zone opportunities, but apart from Williams, Hasselbeck is frustratingly dependent on underneath threats like John Carlson, Chris Baker and the backs.

Alternately, Whitehurst starts because Hasselbeck is injured, ineffective or some combination of both and though he is not adept at reading coverages, he does hail the return of the deep ball and helm a more explosive offense with a better rushing attack.

Forsett and Washington benefit from some kind of passing offense, and both translate previous successes as part-time backs into more consistent success as dual workhorses. It isn't a run that forces eight in the box, but it keeps heat off Hasselbeck and keeps play-action viable.

The defense creates rush in fits and starts. Chris Clemons has huge games and games spent M.I.A. and though he is not the team's primary weakness, Leo is slotted for major upgrade. The lack of consistent rush and a dependence on interceptions and high-leverage stops, means Seattle allows a crap ton of passing yards but pulls off some fancy and decisive turnovers.

The run defense is solid. The strong side proves impossible to run against and that allows Seattle to scheme out the weak side. It doesn't always work, so though Seattle tallies a lot of stops for minimal or negative yardage, it also allows some long, jail-break runs when caught by misdirection.

Mare is Mare. Kicks offs remain a strength and Seattle's kick off unit is again very good. His field goal percentage wavers some but it's not crippling. Ryan punts the crap out of the ball. Sometimes Seattle covers and sometimes they can't and so sometimes field position is flipped and sometimes Ryan is running wild attempting to catch the returner.

8 to 9 Wins

One of two things happen in the passing game:

Okung is back in quick order and a mix of development from Max Unger, an improved run game, and better game situation allow Hasselbeck the kind of sturdy, capacious pockets he needs to be the mid-range rifleman we remember and love. Jeremy Bates builds the passing attack through high percentage short passes and lots of in-breaking, mid-range and deep passes.

The zone run game works and that proves huge. Not only can Seattle chip away at first and ten, not only can it punish weaker run defenses, but the viability of the run game allows for play-action, roll outs and a moving pocket, and largely prevents the exceptionally aggressive and irreverent play by linebackers and ends - dropping contain and siccing the ball carrier -  that became standard game planning for opposing defenses in 2009. Seattle is balanced if not sensational in either facet, but its balanced attack leads to long drives, early leads and come from behind victories.

-or-

Okung is back in quick order and a mix of development from Max Unger, an improved run game, and better game situation and tools allow Whitehurst the time he needs to slowly tick off reads, complete an acceptably high rate of passes, mostly avoid disaster, and bombs-away like a Howitzer. Whitehurst buries opponents with rainbows to Golden Tate, Deon Butler and Deion Branch; keeps safeties honest with posts and crosses; and keeps drives alive with a resurgent short passing game that benefits from a suddenly viable deep attack.

The rush comes alive. It's not only good enough to keep running and run-based passing plays viable, it chews through defenses. Forsett flashes through holes and bullies defensive backs and like a younger Marion Baber with better hands and agility. Leon Washington is a home run threat that hits for average, mixing successful runs with streaks into the third level.

It's not a consistent offense, but like the Moon-era Seahawks, it can drop 30+ on any given opponent.

The pass rush exists in spurts. Sacks are there, but consistent pressure is not and the team allows a lot of total passing yards. The secondary plays well despite this and both Earl Thomas and Marcus Trufant prove outside contenders for the Pro Bowl. The linebackers shoot gaps and cripple runs, blitz, get blown back sometimes, but are, overall, the bunch of coordinated, stifling, pick producing, sack attacking, screen killing band of small, quick and vicious defenders we took for granted from 2005 to 2007.

The rush defense is excellent. Seattle's strong side proves impenetrable but teams attack it anyway, lest they become too predictable. Weak side concerns are allayed by Lawyer Milloy, who is roving, cognizant and on top of runs and passes underneath. Misdirection is a bugaboo, but containment is sound overall, and for the majority of runs, defenders swarm and destroy.

10+ Wins

The offense is equal that of the 8 to 9 win Seahawks, but the defense and special teams stand out.

Clemons and Dexter Davis make the Leo package seem not only viable but an absolute stroke of genius. Teams struggle to contain Brandon Mebane and Red Bryant, and Clemons and Aaron Curry keep the rush unpredictable and deadly. The two combine for 10-20 sacks.

Paired with a top pass rush, the secondary is stingy and opportunistic. There's room underneath and towards the middle, but drives extend over numerous plays, big plays are cut out, and when some mix of penalties, run stuffs and incomplete passes puts the offense into passing downs, Seattle capitalizes in thrilling fashion.

Olindo Mare is equally as good as he was in 2008 and 2009. Jon Ryan punts a regulation sized spheroid of whoop-ass through my criticisms, kicking long and high and distractedly brushing his locks while Seattle's gunners corral and cluster bomb returners into the turf. Seahawks returners bring back the glory days of young Nate Burleson as first Leon Washington, and later Golden Tate, sprint for game-changing return touchdowns.

Comment 93 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like it

But I think the Hawks will fall into the 5-7 wins. My prediction is 7-9, anything after that would be icing on the cake.

by cthunder on Sep 8, 2010 5:41 PM PDT reply actions  

I also see us winning 7 games

I think we mix things up a bit this year; there are going to be games where we’re hitting on all cylinders, but being a Seahawks fan means expecting injuries, so perhaps one or two key losses could be enough to change the scope of the offense or defense.

I’m not too troubled by the recent transactions; while our starting talent is probably the same our depth has been depleted. This team is a tad too top-heavy to survive the same kind of injuries we’ve suffered the last two seasons.

by J.L. White on Sep 9, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

The 5-7 range looks most likely to me.

My prediction has been 7-9 for a while. We’re improved, but still have some weaknesses and learning curves.

by Woodinville_12thMan on Sep 8, 2010 5:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Agree...our chemistry can't be worse than last year

and I want to see that PC and JS are secret geniuses that I shouldn’t have doubted

by illwillbli on Sep 8, 2010 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Reggie Bush

I want to see how often they use Washington and Forsett together, and line one up at WR the way PC used Bush at U$C.

I think that is the explosiveness and unpredictability in the offense. the potential mismatches Washington creates in the passing game. I would like to see a LBer or Safety try and cover him. Not happening, and I am sure on Sunday he will line up out wide more than once.

by Ratman44 on Sep 8, 2010 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm hoping for this too.

When BMW, Tate, Carlson, Forsett, and Washington run out to the field, what defensive players do you send out in return?

by djafrot on Sep 8, 2010 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

2 RBs

If the defense looks and sees 2 RB, 2 WR 1 TE…the personel calls for a base defense. But after further review does the defense allocate washington or Forsett as a WR?

That changes the personnel, unless you are playing Penn State which thinks its LBs can cover WRs.

by Ratman44 on Sep 8, 2010 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

With the Schedule

I can see 5-7 wins with this schedule….Rams, Cards look iffy now, the AFC west minus the chargers look beatable, the Bucs, and if you can stop the run effectively Carolina.

They will have a legitimate shot against all of those teams if tey can stay healthy and muster up any sort of offensive threat.

by Ratman44 on Sep 8, 2010 5:44 PM PDT reply actions  

If we win this Sunday

We could win 4 games in the division….two wins against the weak AFC East, beat the pathetic Bucs, that’s 7 wins right there. And that’s assuming we go 0-5 against the rest of the schedule; the game of football is more like chess than checkers. The board we got this season looks quite favorable to me.

by J.L. White on Sep 9, 2010 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

You forgot to add the projections for the Broncos.

0-4 Seahawk Wins: Tim Tebow arises from depth-chart burial, supernaturally heals Ryan Clady, jump-throws Denver to Superbowl glory, and casts Nick Reed out of Valhalla.

5-7 Seahawk Wins: The Broncos are competent.

8-9 Seahawk Wins: McDaniels’ paranoia grows while he tires of Kyle Orton’s beady eyes and receiving “the wrong look.” Orton is shipped to Tampa Bay, or Miami, or any other place where it’s too goddamn hot, and the neckbeard is finally shaved.

10 Seahawk Wins: The Broncos are sold, renamed, and moved to Los Angeles.

by Anticitizen_One on Sep 8, 2010 5:50 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Calling Bronco fans morons and their mothers/daughters whores is one thing...

but I draw the line when it comes to wishing they lose their team. That’s too low..

by Kryten on Sep 8, 2010 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, don't root for Bronco fans to lose their team

I still root for John Elway to tear his ACL, however, and I do realize he’s been retired for 10 years now. My dislike for that man is unexplainable and unequivocal.

by J.L. White on Sep 9, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, rooting for any city to lose their team is a low blow.

Rooting for Al Davis to buy the Broncos, on the other hand…

by John Edwards on Sep 9, 2010 3:58 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

So you mean it has a halfway decent chance of happening?

The ‘Hawks aren’t gonna be that bad. If San Fran, and more specifically Alex Smith, implodes, the Seahawks will be there to pick up the pieces of the NFC West.

by Cannonater on Sep 9, 2010 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

And, call me crazy, but what if the Cardinals don't suck?

Derek Anderson beat us before, when we were good, on the Browns. A 49er’s collapse does not imply Seahawk dominance… in the least.

by Anticitizen_One on Sep 10, 2010 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is true, I probably don't give the Cardinals enough credit.

Then again, they lost their leaders on offense (Warner) and defense (Dansby), they have a suspect offensive line, and a castoff QB from the Cleveland Brown-stains for crying out loud. That doesn’t inspire confidence.

But I suppose I would have to agree with you that a bad 49ers team does not guarantee Seahawk dominance. The more I think about it, the more wide-open this division becomes. There really is no clear-cut favorite.

by Cannonater on Sep 10, 2010 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

i wouldnt be surprised to have a similar season that oakland di last year.

While not overly-talented, especially on offense with an ineffective QB, the defense and occasional play-maker can cause us to have a couple of unexpected wins, along with a lot of dissapointing, winnable losses. 6 or 7 wins seems reasonable to me.

7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!

by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 8, 2010 5:53 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Did*!

This mobile commenting is a bane to grammer and spell check.

7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!

by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 8, 2010 5:54 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

19-0

duh!

Semper Fi'
WatchKalibRun.com
Pain don't hurt...

by RolloTomasi on Sep 8, 2010 5:57 PM PDT reply actions  

you forgot the 12+ win scenario

Each time Hassesbeck drops back to pass, the ghost of Walter Jones rises from the mist around Matt’s feet, ghoulishly swatting down would-be sackers and laughing his ghostly laugh as Hasselbeck’s arching spirals fall effortlessly into Mike Williams’ outstretch hands…

Russel Okung steps into the lineup in week two to lock down the left tackle position, allowing Hasselbeck time in the pocket and allowing John Carlson time to stealthily slip into the defensive backfield time and time again, clutching short passes, bowling over linebackers, and trampling safeties on his way to the endzone…

Red Bryant and Brandon Meband converge on Alex Smith in game one, pinning the frail young man between sweating blue jerseys. In week two, Mebane and Clemons fall upon Kyle Orton, causing him to consider a career change. In week three, Phillip Rivers falls prey to a vicious Lawyer Milloy’s safety blitz that sends him to the airport for a flight home at halftime. Week four sees Sam Bradford’s season end as Lofa Tatupu drives his shiny blue helmet through the young man’s chinstrap. As Chicago watches film of the Seahawks defense in preparation for their game, he begs his coach to forfeit. As the Seahawks arrive home from Chicago, a 5-0 team, Ken Wisenhunt announces that FB Jerome Johnson will assume their quarterbacking duties against Seattle…

Okay, seriously, if everything goes well we could achieve 6-10.

"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank

by Stevo's on Sep 8, 2010 6:00 PM PDT reply actions  

We can't win 12+ games...

unless Nick Reed is prominently involved

by farmer cam on Sep 8, 2010 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

you're right

the 17 win scenario.

"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank

by Stevo's on Sep 8, 2010 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hasselbeck - three strikes and he's out...

The first time he’s sacked he gets up slowly. The second time he’s sacked he misses two games. The third time he’s sacked his brittle body tells him to seriously contemplate retirement.

by Mylegacy on Sep 8, 2010 6:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Serious question:

While writing the “10+ wins” section; did you smile with hope or grimace with resignation?

by DJ C-Raig on Sep 8, 2010 6:53 PM PDT reply actions  

I can see anything from 3 wins to 9 wins, but my best guess is 4-6 wins

Too many new players early in the season having to adjust to a new scheme and get used to new teammates without the benefit of training camp, still lacking overall talent relative to the rest of the league, but with better coaching than either the Mora or Holmgren eras (both preparing the players, managing the game and making game-time adjustments).

by IslandHawk on Sep 8, 2010 6:54 PM PDT reply actions  

The only reason I'm not

Is because my brain refuses to let me think Okung can’t shake injuries. Fuck that. It can’t happen.

by DJ C-Raig on Sep 8, 2010 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Man..

What happened to our fanbase?!? Yeesh! Debby Downers!

Ka-Kaaa!

by JerryNice on Sep 8, 2010 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Obviously...

Not dwelling on this board complaining about how awful we’re going to be…

Nobody knows anything yet about this team, except are quick to dismiss us entirely before kick-off.

Is ANYONE excited about the game this week on here? I find it very hard to believe that Seahawk fans find it hard to believe that we can beat the 49ers and have a decent season..

I’m not talking 10+ wins here, but at least a competitive season. I’ve never seen so many people at once get so down about something they don’t know enough about yet.

Come on people! It’s a huge week for us!

Ka-Kaaa!

by JerryNice on Sep 8, 2010 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm excited, sure, but I'm more apprehensive than excited.

Very little I’ve seen out of this new FO and coaching staff has me excited. I think we had a good draft, the acquisitions of Mike Williams and Leon Washington were good moves, but pretty much everything else has been a negative in my mind.

Trust me, I want the Hawks to win as much as you do. I just don’t think they will, and we’re in for another couple of years of mediocrity. If I’m wrong, HOT DAMN, that’s great. If we come out and kick ass on Sunday, I’ll be super-duper happy.

by djafrot on Sep 8, 2010 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I believe I'm being realistic. Don't confuse that for being dismissive.

Also, I’m very excited that the season is starting. I don’t need wins to enjoy the season or the team, but it sure fucking helps.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Sep 8, 2010 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I want to watch and we're going to win!

Oh wait— thought it was the coin-toss…
But seriously I think we’ll be good this year. I think the attitude, the talent, and the football intelligence (coaching) makes us a few wins better than last year. Mostly the coaching.
If Mora could get 4 wins, Pete should get 8— plus he now has better talent.

by Kryten on Sep 8, 2010 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

8 or 9 wins

and that is as positive as I can get.

What? No SOUL?

by mrcoffee1969 on Sep 9, 2010 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

The past two seasons happened.

Thank you, Walter Jones.
Thank you, Ken Griffey Jr.

by thebyron on Sep 8, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

We'll all soon find out, and reasonable people disagree on things all the time.

But Carl, for what it’s worth, I don’t want to attack you or tell you how many wins I think we’ll have or anything like that. I just wanted to respond to your reasoning, as food for thought, to consider that you’re actually being very pessimistic and not realistic.

If we think about how this team may overcome the odds and be good, or how they may fail, we all can see there are a score of new and very substantial variables. We all know past results are not indicative of future results, but we also know that continuity is indicative of recognized and proven talent being established and a team with less churn like the 49ers are probably much more likely to be a good team. So building off of what we were last year, which was very bad, lacking in talent in several key areas, the attrition we’ve had, I definitely would agree with you the starting point is pretty low. That is, coming off last year, we’ll probably be pretty bad, without considering all the new variables.

Now, what has changed? Here are some wild card factors, let’s keep count: Is the QB healthy? The entire WR corps is essentially new; the roles incumbents Branch & Butler had previously have changed. Will that all turn out well? Carlson finished with 7 TDs but had a poor year, and it’s blamed on the need to block. Has that been rectified? The left side of the line is different, and we may end up with Stacy Andrews at RT very soon. Better? New — or, fully transitioned to new — blocking scheme. An RB with wheels through the hole in Leon. New offensive system. New defensive system. Overall health of the team, should we expect better? The Leo: will it work? Is it a base to support 3-4 style blitzes? Curry, Davis & Hawthorne blitzing from the edge? Mebane at 3-tech next to a Leo, will that help? Red Bryant? Tats is back, will that make the LBs better? Earl Thomas. Trufant’s back. Will the secondary be improved? More INTs? Will the pass defense philosophy be different?

That’s a shitload of new variables, and each one comes with the question of whether it will turn out positively, or negatively. Almost certainly, not all of them will turn out positively. Some issues will surface, some changes won’t work out. There will surely be some injuries to deal with — hey, they’ve already started.

On the other hand, it’s pretty difficult for all of the variables to be answered negatively. Chances are some of this stuff will work, will be an upgrade. 0-4 wins, there’s always at least a couple teams to hit that mark a year, but even2 teams a year give you about a 6% probability. And few teams have multiple instances of such poor seasons in their history. It’s actually somewhat difficult to be that bad in the NFL.

I can understand if you expect them to be bad. If you just want to say, they were bad last year, maybe worse than 5 wins bad, and the good draft is cancelled out by the talent attrition, and basically the QB & pass rush should keep this team awful, I can understand. That’s reasonable. 0-4 wins is also possible. But it’s pretty pessimistic. You’re basically expecting most or all variables to turn out negatively. Not quite the same as realistic.

by jacobstevens on Sep 9, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

The start to the season will be rough

and the root of the problem will be offensive line struggles.

We’ll start slow, barely lose winnable games in low scoring affairs, but pick up steam as the line begins to gel, Okung returns, and we’ll start to win games.

Seven wins, tops. Five to six are more likely if role players go down with injuries.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 8, 2010 7:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Are you going to go through 5-7 wins, etc?

A little confused here…

I think there is no way we look as bad as we did the past year. While there will be some learning curves, keeping Hass upright and the defense consistent will be key (like every other year. Ha!).

I don’t get why people don’t seem as excited as they did during camp and at the beginning of the preseason…This team is such an anomaly at this point, that ANYTHING is possible. While I’m not going to be screaming “superbowl” just yet, there are too many unknown factors that we’re not taking into account. For instance:

1) O-line solidarity: Some new legs, some potential studs, etc.
2) D-line disruptiveness: Looked great against Minnesota.
3) LB’s: Curry during the beginning of last season? Tatupu back to Pro Bowl form?
4) WR’s: Williams a superstar? Tate a weapon? Carlson fully utilized?
5) etc.
6) etc.

This is too difficult to pinpoint because we just don’t know enough yet. However, I still think we have what it takes to win the division. I love our coaching staff, and apparent new attitude..

Who’s with me?!?

Ka-Kaaa!

by JerryNice on Sep 8, 2010 7:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Hahaha.

We do appreciate your enthusiasm, however!

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 8, 2010 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Setting expectations low..

Usually allows people to get more excited when things go better than planned. While I understand this idea, I just can’t allow myself to start thinking 5-7 wins ALREADY. I saw a different team during the preseason (sans Oakland) than what I’m usually used to.

New energy across the board. Hanging with Minnesota isn’t easy, and we turned that into a slugfest. If we maintain that level of play for most of the season, there’s no way to think that 7-9 wins is out of reach.

Captain optimistic! Woo!

Ka-Kaaa!

by JerryNice on Sep 8, 2010 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know that it's necessarily setting them low...

I think it’s more that there are a lot of questions on this team right now, particularly at pass rush, quarterback, offensive line, and running back. While optimism is great, realistically, the team isn’t that much better off than it has been the last two years.

Hasselbeck hasn’t shown that he can stay healthy for a full season, and I think if he can do so, then we can maintain the level of play from the Minnesota game. There’s also a question of game planning, and how much more teams will do it against us.

 I do think we’ll be competitive in a lot more games than we were last year, but I also think we need more talent overall. I’d say 4 or 5 wins would be most likely.

by splintrdmind on Sep 8, 2010 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've resigned myself to the first scenario occurring.

Anything above will make me happy, but I’m not expecting it.

by MT Olson on Sep 8, 2010 8:24 PM PDT reply actions  

0-4 wins

I want to believe the Qwest Field will bump us up to 5-7 but honestly I think that mystique is dying a little bit. Nothing to do with the fans, it’s just the team sucks.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 8, 2010 9:01 PM PDT reply actions  

We aren't the Rams or the Bucs or the Browns

Do we not have Trufant and ET in the secondary? Do we not have Curry learning how to play football and Lofa learning how to get through the season healthy? Do we not have BMW and Carlson catching the ball, and Forsett and Washington running it? Do we not have BRANDON MUTHERFUCKING ME! BANE?!?!

It might seem like Q/PM cut all our good players, but that didn’t actually happen; even if almost everything goes wrong this season we have enough talent on this team to win 5 games or more. Maybe Okung’s ankle doesn’t heal properly, maybe Hasselbeck breaks into a million pieces, maybe Clemons can’t get consistent pressure and maybe the ZBS doesn’t work right without Gibbs….unless all of that happens we have a good chance to be decent.

We don’t suck.

by J.L. White on Sep 9, 2010 1:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm far more concerned about the offense not functioning because of Hasselbeck

Than our defense.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 9, 2010 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Seems to be both a better play-caller and better at adapting scheme to personnel. Knapp seemed to lack creativity and adaptability to me.

Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result

by IslandHawk on Sep 9, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Hasselbeck is healthy, he'll be decent

I think last year was an aberration (and he only played 7 games in 2008); yes he is old and if he isn’t 100% I do believe he could be a liability on the field….but if he somehow gets through the season unscathed he’ll produce much better than last season.

Of course, I have little faith Matt will survive 16 games. I just don’t see as the liability that you do.

by J.L. White on Sep 9, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow. I can't count.

That’s awful.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 8, 2010 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Asterisked in for 10-15:

Scruffy the mad .gif-er strikes regularly, instilling fear into the hearts of trolls and merriment into the souls of the regulars.

Thank you, Walter Jones.
Thank you, Ken Griffey Jr.

by thebyron on Sep 8, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

ninjasocks was banned?

This is news to me.

Is that the light at the end of the tunnel, or the headlights of an oncoming train?

by Benne on Sep 9, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

what a great read

look forward to rereading this as the season shakes out

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Sep 8, 2010 9:28 PM PDT reply actions  

19-0 bee-yotches!!!

The line will be a well oiled machine from the opening snap as they can all hear Gibbs cursing encouragement in their ears as he trips off into the sunset, and Big Walt has been working on his astral projection skills all offseason, so he’ll sneak into their collective earholes and take possession of their bodies at crucial moments.

The backs will seize the creases and spend most of the games in the second level, getting chased down from behind, which will eat up yardage and clock in bunches, with a major gash or 3 every single game from Mr. Washington.

Hasselbeck will have just enough time to throw early in the season to complete passes to half a dozen people, and, by the end of the season, the box scores will read multiple completions to 8 or more receivers. By Whitehurst, who steps in after we clinch home field advantage in the NFC in week 12 (let’s be realistic, here).

Mike Williams gets more receptions than Housh did last year, for nearly twice as many YAC yards, and 18 touchdowns. Tate and Butler both average over 18 yards per catch, Branch channels Paul Skansi and leads the league in 3rd down conversions. Obomanu is considered for the Pro Bowl as a special teams headhunter and downfield blocker extraordinaire.

Carlson gets 700 yards, Morrah 500.

The Defense, after a merely respectable start, finishes leading the league in sacks, forced turnovers, points allowed and 3rd down conversion percentage allowed. The sight of multiple blue jerseys (Nick Reed, Curry, Big Red and Me! Bane!!! are the usual suspects) in opposing backfields stripping the ball for the recovery or the tall DBs winning the jump balls for the INT becomes routine.

Opposing teams average less than 10 yards on kickoff returns and less than 3 on punt returns.

Zero Pro Bowls, zero coach or GM awards. Zero respect.

Playoffs at Qwest, false starts and turnovers galore. All visiting teams utterly humiliated. National media blathers on about how much we suck, getting many of the most prominent player’s names wrong. Repeatedly.

Super Bowl final score:

Seattle 58 shittsburg 3 Rapistburger retires midway through the 2nd quarter after repeated pinwheel smashes by Nick Reed, Me! Bane!!! and Red.

Followed by a yearlong media jizzfest devoted to the Stealers being the most vastly superior team on the field that day, and for all time. And dark mutterings about those latte sipping envirofags from South Alaska being irrelevant.

A bunch of marginal players get traded for more draft picks, which get traded for 8 picks in the first 3 rounds, plus another dozen in the lower rounds.

Did I miss anything?

by bleedshawkblue on Sep 8, 2010 9:43 PM PDT reply actions  

One problem

Nick Reed was cut.

by PhoneHomeET29 on Sep 9, 2010 12:09 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

He received an injury settlement.

So he can come back later in the season without being IR’d.

by bleedshawkblue on Sep 9, 2010 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

The team has the potential to be the 8-9 wins or even 10+ wins.

But the 5-7 seems most realistic. Always love to read these John as every scenario is well thought-out and any one of them actually seems likely.

by Hopefulmsfan on Sep 8, 2010 10:28 PM PDT reply actions  

At most we could get 10-6.

Realistically it seems like 7-9 or 8-8. But we do have to consider that we have an easy schedule this year. None of our games are on the east coast.

by Seahawksfan23 on Sep 8, 2010 10:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Aside from the Bucs.

Oh wait, when you said “games” did you mean “games against competent NFL teams”? Because then yeah, no games on the east coast.

by Cannonater on Sep 9, 2010 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Correct

Sad though that we lost to them last year.

by Seahawksfan23 on Sep 9, 2010 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm going with the 5-7 win season.

Though 4 isn’t out of the realm of possibility. 8 might be…

Go Seahawks!

by Chirp on Sep 8, 2010 11:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Team season

If heard the Seahawks 12th man, This year should be 53 total Strangers!

by Kevin C Hooks on Sep 9, 2010 2:47 AM PDT reply actions  

I think the Whitehurst vs Hass dynamic will be very interesting

When does whitehurst start? Is it injury related? Will it take a big injury or some little ones? When is our season done enough that we switch?

by stufr on Sep 9, 2010 4:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Same here

This is one of the most exciting things for me.

I’m excited to see a new QB, and I hope we get to see him outside of blowout game situations, this year.

"Pass rushers enter the world of Okung but never leave." - JM

by Nick Andron on Sep 9, 2010 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Depends how the team is playing when we enter the Bye Week

If Matt is healthy but the offense is playing poorly/winless going into the bye, I think Whitehurst is at least discussed as taking over for Hasselbeck.

by J.L. White on Sep 9, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm with the majority here...

I love these types of pieces where different scenarios are covered. It’s not anchored in biases and accounts for multiple possibilities in an unpredictable game. This offers something for everyone.

Great work John.

Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.

by iverson2169 on Sep 9, 2010 5:42 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree.

Put me in scenario #4 I think we are going to surprise even ourselves this year.

I’ll reassess at the Bye, but I expect to be either 3-1 or 4-0 at the by the end of week 4.

If we lose to SF and SD at home, and drop the Brooncos game on the road, and struggle to pull off a close one at STL I will be sad, but unsurprised.

First 4-0! Then the world!

by Tigloki on Sep 9, 2010 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm hoping for 8 to 10 wins

But I’m expecting 4 to 6.

Como estan, beetches?

by mooseman923 on Sep 9, 2010 1:48 PM PDT reply actions  

I was hoping for 7 wins at the start of training camp

But Okung’s injury, coupled with the roster morass, make me less than enthusiastic.

7 is optimistic, 5 is realistic, 4 is pessimistic.

FG's second favorite football-illiterate semi-troll.

by Hmph on Sep 9, 2010 2:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Official Field Gulls OT Thread - In Which We Gush About Our Favorite TV Shows
Hatersgonnahate_small
A short note on what worked for the 49ers, but isn't really a "model"
Halloween_mobster_small
Come on in!
Mail
A Reply to Beekers and Some Comments About Comments

Recent FanPosts

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small
GM John Schneider On The Ideal QB
Bodypaint_small
Delocated ad
Beast_mode_tshirt_small
Tats Comeback Attempt?
994_small
Free Agents vs. NFL Draft - Wide Receivers
Small
Where Will the Seahawks' Churn Hit? Defensive Line Edition
Small
Expanding Our Football Knowledge
994_small
Free Agents vs. NFL Draft - Defensive End

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

284430_601240951600_44900771_32958650_2317286_n_small Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Hatersgonnahate_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Halloween_mobster_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Mail Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Osprey1_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill