Coach Fran Didn't Do Red No Favors
I was excited when we drafted him and horrified upon further inspection.
There was Texas:
I started by watching Bryant and Texas A&M duke it out with Texas. I was aghast. Bryant looked just awful. He was slow, slow off the snap, slow in stunts and slow to the ball carrier, the few times he was anywhere near the ball carrier. I couldn’t believe my eyes. "Why would any team draft Bryant?" I thought, and especially "Why would a team that puts so much stake in production draft Bryant?" He was weak, washed out by single blocks, incapable of splitting double teams and generally outclassed by his linemates, college fodder like Henry Smith and Kellen Heard. Most troubling, though, he was lazy, giving up if losing off the snap, coasting against double teams and eventually off the field entirely.
Miami:
Onto Miami. Bryant starts strong but fades. By halftime, Miami is up 24-0. Masquerading as an Aggies fan, I must say, what an awful, joyless and discouraging team. Their top talent, presumably Martellus Bennett, has all the pizzazz of Randy McMichael and jumps like he’s attached to the turf by rubber bands. I’m starting to see a story develop. The team captain, the NFL talent on a team full of scrubs, reeled in for his senior season, because of loyalty, duty, a degree and one more shot at the top with the boys. Crushed. By an absent coach and barely mediocre team.
And his debut with the Seahawks:
Bryant subbed in on Oakland's third offensive drive, replacing Craig Terrill. Excepting his occasional looks at the nose on goal-line five man fronts, Bryant played exclusively from the left defensive tackle position. In five of the six plays, Bryant was easily blocked out of the play, mostly by third string center (but playing right guard) Chris Morris. Morris, an organizational player on the bubble, must have thanked his lucky stars he pulled such an easy assignment in such a crucial game. Bryant's lone acceptable play, a read and react where he kept Morris out of his body and coasted left collapsing the hole, was noteworthy only because it broke the monotony of ineffectiveness. Bryant recorded the tackle, but really was but one in a sea of Seahawks defenders.
Followed by two seasons of injuries, limited snaps and poor performance. The big man with fleet feet and exceptional natural power was failing. Red Bryant was playing his way out of the league. Look closer, someone did.
Look at what Red did against Fresno State:
So I thought I’d hop back to the past. Texas A&M’s second contest and first against a team worth a damn, Fresno State. Fresno finished 13th in unadjusted offensive FEI and Scout.com calls the line its strength. The Aggies entered 1-0 after stomping a big 38-7 bootprint into Montana State. "We’re a contender!" spirit soaring, Coach Fran not yet depantsed, huzzah! And huzzah is right, because Bryant looks awesome: Exploding single blocks, cleaving doubles, working the right defensive end on three man fronts and playing like a pro prospect among fodder, scrubs and jobbers. Bryant finished with his lone big statistical showing of the season: 6.5 total tackles, 1 solo tackle for a loss and 1 sack.
Bryant, end. Red Bryant, the 320, 6'5", colossus with sub-5.0 speed, playing end in college and excelling. Someone noticed. Dan Quinn noticed.
And now, in an off-season of reclamation projects, Seattle attempts its very largest. Will Bryant turn his power, quickness and ferocity into performance, or is this the last stand for someone about anyone could see talent in, but someone that has never turned that raw talent into professional caliber play?
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bryant playing opposite of the Leo.
Is his ability to take on blocker and push them back going to open that side for LB blitzes?
He could dominate if given the chance to play to his strengths
Red Bryant broke my heart last year ever since he took the field and I saw his raw strength and quickness and I waited and waited and then last year against Tampa Bay he got obliterated on a backside cut block because he came off too tall allowed himself to get driven back at the snap.
What most people don’t understand sometimes is that the technique of a Defensive tackle has to be so fine in order for the entire defense to work. He only has to be off an inch or two or a step or an arm over from a 42 yard run or a blitz being picked up. It’s mentally straining and with a guy like Bryant who wasn’t a natural technician he was built to fail in the pros as a DT.
As a DE it’s a little different. He can be protected and he doesn’t have to be so restrained because he will have backup. This should give him confidence. His physical assets can make him a success alone without having to think and control so much area. He can just simply go do a job and not worry about trying to make his 6’5" frame into a submarine torpedo. He can be a bulldozer instead.
If I see Red in coverage
…in a zone blitz play, I will not be able to contain my facepalm.
/dick joke
by Bloof on Sep 9, 2010 1:35 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Some folk in Big 12 circles argued that he was a 3-4 end with versatility
a bit like former A&M star Ty Warren.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
Fun read thanks John
I simply belief that Red is completely motivated to show how big of an asset he is to this football team. I am confident his relationship the coaching staff will motivate him further and to trust a system that will bring out the best in him.
He might not create the numbers attributed to highlight reels and stardom,however, Red will cause disruptions on the front line that will cause headaches for opposing teams.
I like his name….red….the eyes of opposing qb’s tossing and turning the night before gameday!
LETS GET READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL
I think I have FINALLY put a finger on what makes John so good...
It’s an unbelievable ability to find fresh material (quotes, scouting, and recaps) in volume, and still have time to pound out so much content.
Research is the single most time consuming aspect of good writing. It amazes me how developed John’s pieces are with facts, tidbits, and “bites” given the sheer volume he writes.
Do you have a technique for finding info?… or are you connected to a network of resources?
At any rate… THAT is what IT is. It’s the fact that the content is rarely watered down. We are never cheated with volume at the expense of true content, and that builds trust.
Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.
by iverson2169 on Sep 9, 2010 8:40 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I'm pretty sure he's told us over and over.
Following his curiosity. He watches, sees something and watches it closer. Here and in his book he keeps leaving giant clues, saying that anyone can do what he does. When you want to know something, keep watching until you know about it. And you notice more that you want to know and follow that.
The other half of the equation is he’s already a pretty good writer, and loves writing. So his skills in using words paint better pictures than you or I would be if we were trying to do the same. I envy the writing ability, but not enough to write and write and get better at it. At least not yet, one of those things I hope I get into/get time for later in life.
Yeah Cashless.... I get what he's doing.
It’s not particularly hard to truly observe. The crux of what I’m getting at is how the hell does he research…. and observe…. and observe….. and research….. and observe….. and STILL have time to pump out the volume of work he does?
He can’t have any other job. This must be his life.
Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.
I don't know if you noticed, but when he quit his job and started doing this full time, it got better here.
A lot better. The time difference with this being his actual job was worth it.
I didn’t get that you were asking for efficiency secrets, so I thought I was answering your question. I think the lesson he wants us to get is, it’s not how good your source is, it’s that you do it yourself. Obviously, as you say you get it, but I didn’t get that out of your questions.
Ironically, I’d bet that most of us here will use what John says when talking about a player, because we trust the time he’s put into earning those opinions. I know I’ve done it.
He who hates the appeal-to-authority has become an appealed-to authority.
Thank you, Walter Jones.
Thank you, Ken Griffey Jr.
by thebyron on Sep 10, 2010 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I catch myself doing this all the time.
Though to be honest, it makes a lot of sense. I don’t spend nearly as much time watching and analyzing football as he does, and he seems more than willing to acknowledge that he’s wrong, so he’s as good of an “authority” on the Seahawks as anyone else I can find.
He probably hates that I wrote this.
Don’t ya, John?
Same here. Why not? He deserves a nickname, like the Professor or something. Oh, that's taken.
The Expert. The Knowitall. Cold Hard Seahawk Facts. The Researcher Who Also Empirically Observes and Thus Can be Trusted.
Or just John Morgan, Dammit!
by jacobstevens on Sep 10, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
This is EXACTLY the point...
The reason your editorial is trustworthy is because you dont cheat us with crap. The research is always relevant and current.
Even the most eloquent “filler” cannot fool your dumbest casual football fan. It’s the reason I come back. I don’t normally feel welcome in “Lord of the Flies” type environments, but the quality here is a draw.
My question was answered above. You quit your regular job to do this full time. It shows.
If content is king, then content (in volume) must be god.
Thanks again.
Bring Your Game, Leave Your Name.
PS: Screen name isn't what you think it means.
by iverson2169 on Sep 11, 2010 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Kentwan Balmer can similarly benefit in our defense
Its no accident that Quinn and Bradley nabbed Balmer when he was holding out from the 49ers. He’s another big man who has amazing feet, and more natural pass rush speed than Red Bryant. Balmer was frustrated with the 3-4 scheme on the 49ers where positions on the D line are notated as: “DT-NT-DT”. They don’t even admit to having defensive ends, and Balmer’s natural abilities were stymied.
I’m looking forward to Balmer starting to sub for Bryant and bring much of what Cornbread brings,while also subbing for Mebane at the 3, and bringing much more than Craig Terrill ever could from our second-string line. We have some very special big men on our defensive line this year. I’m still worried that we lack talent at the Leo, but we have some awesome young big men to watch at the other positions.
"Football players are temperamental. That's 90 percent temper and 10 percent mental." - Doug Plank
Is Red Bryant the biggest starting DE,
in a 4-3 defense, in the NFL? Leo system et al.
Haloti Ngata.
About the same, depending on the year. Real fluctuations can be 20 lbs or more at that size, and we don’t really know if Ngata is closer to 350, or closer to 320. While Red does not seem to be the 330 he’s sometimes been, it’s tough to tell.
Is Ngata a 4-3 end?
I thought he was the NT in a 3-4. Or one of the DT in a 4-3 maybe.
Treating the Leo system as a 3-4 aren’t they still different positions?
by Scotia Seahawk on Sep 10, 2010 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Ngata is an end in a hybrid system.
Calling the Baltimore system a 3-4 or a 4-3 would be like calling the Seattle system a 3-4 or 4-3. It’s some of both.
To be honest, around the league the pure 4-3 or 3-4 team seems to have vanished. Not even the Chargers run only 3-4 defenses any more with Ron Rivera down there. I’m sure there’s some examples, the Bears and Colts I don’t think have any 3-4 formations, and I am sure there are others. But Ngata and Red are in similar sets of formations, with some 4-3 and some 3-4. I couldn’t tell you if Ngata plays DT in the 4-3 type sets or DE.

by 


























