The Next Four Drives
The Saints and Seahawks had traded haymakers like a Rocky flick. Boom! Boom! What terrible, insulting to the sport of boxing, fight action!
Much of the rest of the second quarter was more like a period of expository dialogue. Let's get through it quickly.
1-10-NO 19 (10:55) 9-D.Brees pass incomplete short left to 21-J.Jones (57-D.Hawthorne).
Saints run a play-action left, roll right. Chris Clemons works around right end but is shadowed and blocked out by David Thomas. Drew Brees looks left, targets Julius Jones and passes. David Hawthorne undercuts the route and almost intercepts the pass.
2-10-NO 19 (10:48) PENALTY on NO-77-C.Nicks, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at NO 19 - No Play.
2-15-NO 14 (10:48) 21-J.Jones up the middle to NO 17 for 3 yards (29-E.Thomas).
Colin Cole and Brandon Mebane hold ground. Lofa Tatupu drives David Thomas back into Jones. Earl Thomas closes from the third level to pop Jones after three.
3-12-NO 17 (10:13) (Shotgun) 9-D.Brees pass incomplete short middle to 12-M.Colston.
Seahawks rush three. Clemons pressures from around left end. Brees steps forward and fires at Colston, but the pass is low and wide-left.
The Seahawks do a good job of anticipating Colston out of the slot, assigning him Thomas and Lofa Tatupu, but it's the pressure that forces the incomplete pass.
(Punt)
1-10-SEA 38 (9:55) 20-J.Forsett right tackle to SEA 44 for 6 yards (51-J.Vilma, 91-W.Smith).
John Carlson fails his cut block attempt on Will Smith and Smith tracks down Justin Forsett after a gain of six. Force is caught cutting opposite the stretch right. It's a nifty little run with good push and a quality cut back lane. As for Carlson, remember when he missed just about every block? In all the hubbub about his diminished production in the passing game, his improved ability to block has been ignored.
Blocking matters! Football is not found in a box score!!
2-4-SEA 44 (9:18) (Shotgun) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass incomplete short left to 20-J.Forsett.
Hasselbeck motions into shotgun. Sedrick Ellis bullies Tyler Polumbus back and towards Hasselbeck. Hasselbeck looks to outlet on the left but sees that Will Smith is running stride for stride with Forsett. He throws it away.
3-4-SEA 44 (9:13) (Shotgun) 8-M.Hasselbeck pass incomplete short right to 17-M.Williams.
Hasselbeck gets nervous feet, double clutches and throws the pass away over the head of Mike Williams. Seahawks commit seven blockers. Both wideouts are blanketed and slot receiver Brandon Stokley is double covered. It's a good decision. Especially since Hasselbeck probably shouldn't scramble.
(Punt)
1-10-NO 19 (9:01) 21-J.Jones left guard to NO 20 for 1 yard (98-R.Brock). FUMBLES (98-R.Brock), RECOVERED by SEA-57-D.Hawthorne at NO 18. 57-D.Hawthorne to NO 18 for no gain (21-J.Jones).
The fumble is pretty straight forward: Saints run an inside zone. It's completely mangled. Ugly, ugly play. Tatupu and Clemons get penetration but miss. Cole is out of position. Craig Terrill is being forced back.
Raheem Brock is matched against Jeremy Shockey. Shockey begins a halfhearted block and then drops it. All the disruption has slowed this play and Jones is still puttering around in the backfield. Brock cuts in and slaps the ball away, forcing the fumble.
It's cool that Brock and Clemons manned opposite ends against first and 10, and it's cooler still that the Saints ran the ball and Seattle's strongside-end free defensive line was able to contain and force a fumble. More of this. More Clemons and Brock.
Jeremy Shockey: bane to every team that plays him.
1-10-NO 18 (8:50) 24-M.Lynch right end to NO 12 for 6 yards (56-J.Dunbar, 98-S.Ellis)
Inside zone right: Sean Locklear drives back Jeff Charleston and Marshawn Lynch runs between Michael Robinson and Locklear. It's a pretty good rush lane, and Lynch looks surprisingly explosive entering and running through it. Polumbus loses Ellis and Ellis is able to run across the field and initiate the tackle on Lynch. The scrum finishes him off.
2-4-NO 12 (8:08) 24-M.Lynch right end to NO 10 for 2 yards (97-J.Charleston, 22-T.Porter).
Stretch right. A potential cutback left is spoiled when Polumbus can not cut Remi Ayodele. Lynch plows forward towards the pile and gains two.
3-2-NO 10 (7:44) 24-M.Lynch up the middle to NO 10 for no gain (41-R.Harper).
Seahawks attempt to run an inside zone but do not account for Roman Harper. He blitzes off right end and wraps Lynch in the back field.
4-2-NO 10 (7:07) 10-O.Mare 29 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-49-C.Gresham, Holder-9-J.Ryan.
Seahawks tie the Saints 17-17.
40 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I been waiting to read about this one.
It’s cool that Brock and Clemons manned opposite ends against first and 10, and it’s cooler still that the Saints ran the ball and Seattle’s strongside-end free defensive line was able to contain and force a fumble. More of this. More Clemons and Brock.
more importantly is having Brock, Clemons Mebane & Cole more effective (cool?) than the unbalanced line?
Brock/Clemons smells kind of Colts-ish to me
And the Colts can only do that because they’re always up one or two scores. It’s a nice wrinkle for us but I dunno…
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 11, 2011 8:50 PM PST up reply actions
Certainly better at rushing the passer
Defending the run would probably depend on the matchup, but I like it against Martz and the Bears.
I think
it’s safe to say that the Saints o-line is more better and consistent than the Bears’? What I saw semi-consistently throughout the game was pressure from 3-man sets. Given that I don’t analyze the games like you do (no DVR for me), is that true? Did the Hawks get pressure from 3-4 man sets?
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 11, 2011 9:20 PM PST up reply actions
Speaking of run defense,
after the Seahawks lost Bryant and Cole during the Raiders game, and before Cole got back, Seattle’s run defense plummeted to ~30 or so, right? I was looking at FO today and I noticed that, in the few games that Cole played at the end of the season, their run defense climbed all the way back up to 17th. I don’t know how much of that is because of Cole, but the it seems like the guy really does help our defense out.
Imma send you a message
hold tight. Hawks were getting good pressure with 3-4 man fronts. I believe the announcers even said at one point the Saints were having trouble with 3-4 man fronts, but I coulda imagined that you know… whiskey… adrenaline… fucks witchyo head man.
by jubelthebear on Jan 11, 2011 10:03 PM PST up reply actions
That seemed right.
It looked to me like it was because our ends kept blowing past the Saints tackles when they were single-blocked. N’Awlins might need to invest in a O-lineman or two in the draft.
Thanks
and yeah, it seemed like even Bane in the middle was pushing through the wall he had to constrict Brees’ throwing lanes. If the front can put up the pressure like that, and given that Cutler isn’t nearly as good as Brees, I think we have a legitimate change at winning this game on Sunday.
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 12, 2011 7:15 AM PST up reply actions
Are the Hawks improving in the run offense?
It seems like Lynch’s vision and the O-Line’s blocking have improved. Are they still running zone plays or more power plays? As if I really understand the difference…..thoughts?
There's no simple explanation,
at least that I have… so here goes the quick and incomplete explanaition:
In zone blocking players are responsible for blocking an area of the field. In man blocking the lineman is responsible for blocking a specific defender.
by jubelthebear on Jan 11, 2011 10:25 PM PST up reply actions
Hell yes, more Brock analysis please.
Also, as many times as I read, “What terrible, insulting to the sport of boxing, fight action!” I can’t make sense out of it. The fight action was what is terrible, right?
Wooooo!
by Anticitizen_One on Jan 11, 2011 9:59 PM PST reply actions
I read it as
What terrible fight action—an insult to the sport of boxing. But I could very well be wrong.
Thought it was a reference to the Rocky films
where every punch is a haymaker that connects and jabs are non-existent.
Because that’s how every boxing match is, obviously. /sarcasm
I also read it this way.
Or to mean this. Or somesuch.
by BrooklynPreacher on Jan 12, 2011 8:32 AM PST up reply actions
Rocky is nothing but haymakers where guys have iron chins
And can win despite 6 knockdowns when any sane boxing ref would stop the fight.
Seahawks 41 Saints 36: Beast Mode.
Rocky is nothing but one sided haymakers
All Rocky does is get hit until the 15th round, where he lands a monster punch that knocks the opponent out. Then Rocky falls down, gets back up before the other guy, and wins. Then Rocky gets brain damage. Then Rocky comes back when he’s 60.
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 12, 2011 8:54 AM PST up reply actions
I love that picture of Lynch and Forsett.
I’d be very tempted to buy a print of it and trying to get it signed at camp this summer, but unfortunately if I go to the website where it says “Buy Photo” I can’t find that particular photo anywhere.
It might be for the best though. I’d probably buy it and never end up following through on getting it signed.
by Mind of no mind on Jan 11, 2011 10:05 PM PST reply actions
One can dream!
Who knows, it may become one of those 8×11 prints that they sell in the fan shop at Qwest for 10 bucks that come autographed.
I’m definitely going to kinkos for either Marshawn stiff-arming Porter or leaping into the endzone, signing to the Saints to get off his nuts.
Wooooo!
by Anticitizen_One on Jan 11, 2011 10:12 PM PST up reply actions
What's your email?
I’ll send you a large version that you can have printed.
Lonely like cheese and baloney only / I could've broke my sacroiliac
Silly grind, Billy Jack, illy nine milli black - MF DOOM
by Wayward Llama on Jan 12, 2011 4:58 AM PST up reply actions
Cool, thank you!
it’s amag11 at hotmail.com
by Mind of no mind on Jan 13, 2011 2:54 AM PST up reply actions
I was really thinking Hawthorne had that pick, watching it live
Soooooo close there.
Same here.
I swore he had it til I saw the other angle.
by BrooklynPreacher on Jan 12, 2011 8:33 AM PST up reply actions
Just when I was thinking BeastForce would be shortlived and one of these guys would leave
I want more of it.
Seahawks 41 Saints 36: Beast Mode.
by SSreporters on Jan 12, 2011 8:58 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Huzzah!
I thought it overrated – but then i was like “Holy crap, what was that?! I want more!”
It’s like a drug.
by BrooklynPreacher on Jan 12, 2011 9:05 AM PST up reply actions
Let's hope we don't have to go to rehab, then
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 12, 2011 9:06 AM PST up reply actions
O/T but It doesn't take much for classes to get canceled in this area, does it?
4 inches of snow at most = No classes.
Not that I’m complaining….
Seahawks 41 Saints 36: Beast Mode.
Nice.
9-10" here and schools still on.
by BrooklynPreacher on Jan 12, 2011 9:27 AM PST up reply actions
I have a game this weekend in Manhattan
I was so fricking excited when the snow was forecast earlier this week. Football in the snow is incredibly fun.
There are few things in life more beautiful
than a well-thrown pass sailing through the falling snow.
by BrooklynPreacher on Jan 12, 2011 10:40 AM PST reply actions
Wildly and incredibly off topic:
As much as I love these recaps, I can’t stop thinking about this weekend. Do we have a chance against the Bears? I say “chance” only because I think that’s all we need in order to win. I feel like this game has more intriguing personnel matchups than most.
Love the game, love the beer, love your team.
by THolt on Jan 12, 2011 10:51 AM PST via mobile reply actions

by 






























