Rational Hope: The Russell Okung Factor
Seahawks fans surely feel hopeful. They beat the Champs. They are manning the biggest bandwagon since Breesus ferried New Orleans to the Super Bowl. They beat the Bears in Chicago, and convincingly. The final score was 23-20, Seahawks, but Devin Hester's touchdown return came with 2:14 left in the fourth quarter. Seattle had surpassed 75% win probability late in the third quarter and never relinquished that lead. Following the return, Seattle's win probability was still 90%. The touchdown return wasn't quite in "garbage time" but it's impact on the scoreboard was greater than its impact on the outcome of the game.
It's hard not to feel confident when your team has already beaten the team it will face. Yet the Seahawks are still decided underdogs. When you consider what kind of juggernauts typically secure a first round bye in the playoffs, the Bears are underwhelming. Their regular season point differential ranked tenth in the NFL. The Bears rank 16th by DVOA, and 14th by ER. That means they're mediocre, but mediocre teams like the Chiefs and Bucs have torn the Seahawks to shreds.
So why should Seahawks fans feel hopeful? Apart from blind faith and homer loyalty. Here is the first of three reasons I think the Seahawks will win.
The Russell Okung Factor
Chicago won the Julius Peppers sweepstakes and have benefited enormously from the signing. Chicago's signature defense was a shadow of itself in 2009. Brian Urlacher missed much of the season. The ends were old, moldy and not nearly as disruptive as Lovie Smith's base defense requires. The secondary was young and patchwork. The 2010 Bears secondary is not sensational by any stretch, but replacing Al Afalava with Chris Harris and Zack Bowman with Tim Jennings are relatively big moves, because Afalava and Bowman were liabilities in coverage. Harris and Jennings are steady.
All those important changes accounted for, Peppers is still the talent that makes this defense click. A Tampa 2 relies on the ability of its front four to create pressure. Apart from Peppers, the Bears front four is pretty average. Tommie Harris lost his starting job. Anthony Adams, Henry Melton and Matt Toeaina comprise a quality defensive tackle rotation, but are not game changing talents. Israel Idonije is a quality bookend that's stout against the run and fairly disruptive as a pass rusher. He should present problems for Sean Locklear, but I doubt Idonije will dominate like the Panthers Charles Johnson did. And like we saw with the Rams in week 17, if the Seahawks can trust Russell Okung to match one-on-one against one end, Seattle can protect Sean Locklear with a tight end or back.
The teams that have had the best success against the Bears defense have been able to match stud left tackles against Peppers. It's not about sacks, or quarterback hits or tackles for a loss, but time in the pocket, uncontested passes and the personnel needed to protect the quarterback. Peppers had a relatively big game against Jason Peters, but the Eagles finished with 398 yards of total offense and only one turnover. When I write "big game" ultimately what I am referring to is stats. And even a "big game"--four tackles, a sack, a quarterback hit, a tackle for a loss and a pass defended--only gives a vague impression of Peppers impact on eight of 70 offensive plays the Eagles ran.
Peters, Matt Light, D'Brickashaw Ferguson and Jake Long are the elite pass blocking left tackles Peppers and the Bears have faced. The Eagles, Patriots and Jets offenses averaged 422 yards and one turnover. The Dolphins, with a hobbled Long and starting Tyler Thigpen in his first and only start of the season, were shutout and crushed. In week six, the Seahawks, with Okung returning from injury, finished with 353 yards of total offense and no turnovers. That is a good bit better than Seattle's season average of 298 and 1.9, and good bit worse (for Chicago) than the Bears season average of 314 and 2.2.
Whether it's accepted now or in three years, Okung is a top-tier left tackle. He shut down Peppers in their first meeting. Football is rarely so simple as win one matchup, win the game, but against a simple system that relies on consistent pass rush, and against a front four that depends on one talent to disrupt, create matchup problems and free others, one matchup won can take the teeth from the Bears pass rush and allow the Seahawks to overachieve.
It's happened before.
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I appreciate the hope. That's a good bit of information.
I’m still going into this with the underdog feeling though, and that’s okay. Nobody is picking us to win and I think that’s the way the Hawks like it.
Hasselbeck knows this defense inside and out
If he has time in the pocket, I think he, Stokely and BMW could do a job on the Bears.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jan 13, 2011 4:58 PM PST reply actions
I don't think enough is being made about Jay Cutler being a playoff virgin.
You’d have to go back to Cutler’s senior year of high school when he led the Heritage Hills Patriots to a 15-0 record to find big game success on his resume. In Denver, Cutler quarterbacked one of the worst 3 game choke jobs in NFL history.
Denver (8-8) completed a monumental collapse, becoming the first team since division play began in 1967 to miss the playoffs after having a three-game lead with three weeks to go. Needing just one win to wrap up the division, the Broncos lost at Carolina, at home to Buffalo and then to the Chargers.
In what essentially amounted to a playoff game against the Chargers, Cutler and the Broncos lost 52-21 with Cutler throwing two interceptions.
The only other QB without playoff experience in the playoffs this year was Matt Cassel, and he completed just 9-18 passes for 70 yards and 3 interceptions against Baltimore. Obviously Baltimore’s defense is much better than Seattle’s, but it’s still true that precious few QBs win their first playoff game. Matt Hasselbeck, Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Rex Grossman, and Philip Rivers all lost their first playoff game.
The obvious rebuttal to my point is the playoff record of guys like Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, and Mark Sanchez. While they didn’t necessarily look spectacular doing it, they all won their first playoff games. So it certainly can be done, but I still think it’s very important to acknowledge how difficult it is for a QB to get that elusive first playoff win. The pressure to the win game (especially when you’re the favorite) is out of this world, and the game is played at a different speed. And when the QB like in question is prone to forcing throws and throwing off of his back foot, then as afan, I’d be very nervous about my QB. Perhaps the Seahawks defense doesn’t have the horses to expose a shaky Cutler in his first playoff start, but I have no doubt that it’s going to take him more than a few series to get his playoff legs under him.
To support your original point
The three guys who won were not depended on to win. They just had to stay out of their teams way and they were young enough that they filled that role and nothing more.
Cutler fancy’s himself as one of the best in the league. The Bears would do well to depend on their defense and run the ball alot, like 60 percent of the time. Cutler won’t do that though. He will take his shots. If we can get up, or keep it close into the second half he will take some shots that he shouldn’t in an attempt to win the game. Thats where we have a chance to capitalize.
Erm I totally echoed you.
(Read before you write, read before you write!)
The sun will shine on winter snow. And shadows fade In Excelsis Deo. GO HASSELBECK!!!
Those three guys
were not the cornerstones of their team. They had dominant defenses and run games around them. I think that’s why Forte will be so pivotal to the outcome of this game.
The sun will shine on winter snow. And shadows fade In Excelsis Deo. GO HASSELBECK!!!
I'm sure a Bears fan would argue that
they have a dominant defense, a good run game, home field advantage and that Cutler just needs to play the role of game manager (like Roethlisberger, Flacco, and Sanchez) to beat the Seahawks.
Don't forget Martz...
If the bears fall behind Mike will forget that the QB is allowed to habd the ball off, and just consistently call for pass after pass.
Martz is more stubborn then Cutler.
by Ratman44 on Jan 13, 2011 7:15 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Respectfully dissenting.
I am not sure I believe the “first playoff game” argument has substance. Cutler has been way better than Matt this year, and has arguably a worse supporting cast on offense.
by michaelfox99 on Jan 13, 2011 7:16 PM PST up reply actions
You don't think nerves play a factor in sports?
It doesn’t matter that Cutler has performed at a higher level than Matt this year. This isn’t a regular season game. This is a new experience for Cutler, and nobody knows how he’s going to respond to such intense pressure. Maybe he’s able to harness his nervous injury and comes out on fire, or maybe he’ll puke in the tunnel and all of his throws are high to start the game.
Take Ben Roethlisberger for example. As much as I hate to say it, he is one of the best QBs in football. I also think that he was completely overwhelmed from a mental standpoint in his first Super Bowl against the Seahawks. He let the pressure of the big game get to him, and as a result, Antwan Randle El was the best Steelers QB on the field that day. A few years later against the Cardinals in the Super Bowl, he was a totally different QB, who didn’t let the pressure of the big game get to him.
Don’t think of this as an argument of Matt vs Cutler. We’ve seen plenty of big name veteran QBs flame out in spectacular fashion in the playoffs. I’m in no way Matt is a lock for a big game solely because he is a veteran of the playoffs. All I’m saying is that nerves absolutely play a major role in sports, and a single elimination playoff game is the ultimate pressure cooker. There is definitely a chance that this game proves to be too big for Jay Cutler. Maybe it’s only for the first few series, but sometimes that’s difference between winning and losing.
Whoops. Meant *nervous energy*
although I’m fine with Cutler having a nervous injury.
that shop took some time.
no seams. Blended the neckline/hair shirt nicely, hit the light right for the background flash shot.
Would take me 4-6 hours to do that. Don’t have the patience for that kinda work for an interweb post.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
by hazbro24 on Jan 14, 2011 7:21 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
What was interesting in that matchup was that Okung OWNED Peppers
Really.
It wasn’t even close, and there was little that was fluky about it. It was pretty much one on one the entire game, and Peppers did next to nothing.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
I'm real surprised
But how much enthusiasm and trust you have in a humbling rookie left tackle. I am shocked…. thankyou!
"Now reach in that bag and pull out my wallet."
“Which one is yours?”
“It’s the one that says Bad Russell Okung.”
So what happens if...
Peppers move to the other side and lines up across from Locklear? Peppers has reportedly moved around quite a bit this year to find the ideal match-up. Seems like the ’Hawks would still have to protect Lock and that Okung would still own his man…
Locklear will likely get help
RTs often get TE help.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jan 14, 2011 9:27 AM PST up reply actions
What, hey, huh, whatdidowhatido
Almost sure I did post that, it happened right after the W17 game.
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 14, 2011 6:34 PM PST up reply actions
I thought Carlson's been better blocking lately
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 14, 2011 1:05 PM PST up reply actions
I wonder how Okungs ankles feel right now as opposed to the game in week 6.
I think that will be the deciding factor on if he can reproduce what he did in that game.
Or even how it feels at game time.
But it’s nice if it feels good right now, too.
Sorry.
by BrooklynPreacher on Jan 14, 2011 9:02 AM PST up reply actions
Good column from Kelley in the Seattle Times on that subject today...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/stevekelley/2013931271_kelley14.html
Sounds like it’s been a real ordeal for the rook.
This comment makes no sense
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 14, 2011 1:06 PM PST up reply actions
Are you serious?
A reply about the condition of Okung’s ankle to a comment about the condition of Okung’s ankle that includes a very interesting and insightful article. Yeah, you’re right. Shitty comment.
GET OFF ME!!!
by the other side on Jan 14, 2011 1:27 PM PST up reply actions
Sigh.
yes, of course I was. I should have known better, I just started posting here and should not have started off with pseudo aggressive comments.
In any case, I don’t think the column was particularly good. It certainly wasn’t bad, and it’s relevant to the discussion, but don’t see anything exceptional about it.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 14, 2011 2:02 PM PST up reply actions
Sorry shouldn't have jumped on you.
I found the article better than most of his since it was comprised almost entirely of quotes.
GET OFF ME!!!
by the other side on Jan 14, 2011 2:14 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah!
Fuck that article, I’m so pissed that I had to read it.
Every Sunday, Section 336's loudest fan.
You should be doubly pissed
turns out, you didn’t have to read it. Good luck fucking it.
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 14, 2011 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
I want Okung wearing ski boots
De Gutibus non disputandum est
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 14, 2011 1:06 PM PST up reply actions
I want king kung wearing five fingers and a tutu.
And then man handle peppers. Would be awesome.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by 
































