Seahawks Win In Jersey: Looking At This Team's Direction
Remember three weeks ago when everyone thought the Seahawks were the worst team in the NFL? Remember a little while before that when the Seahawks' failures prompted some national publication to make up rumors that Pete Carroll and John Schneider weren't getting along? Remember when everyone thought that James Carpenter was a bust and that the Seahawks had the worst offensive line in football?
Well, those seem like distant memories after the Hawks have won two out of three, and even in losing, gave a good team in the Atlanta Falcons a real run for their money. The Seahawks are no longer the NFL's whipping boy, for two weeks anyway. The Seahawks are no longer in the Suck for Luck conversation.
This win, combined with the losing effort last week and the win against the Cardinals two weeks ago has told us some things about this team. Let's go over some of them:
The Seahawks Have Some Depth:
The Hawks started this week without starting receiver Mike Williams, starting left guard Robert Gallery, starting cornerback Marcus Trufant and at varying points in this game lost starting tight end Zach Miller, right guard John Moffitt, quarterback Tarvaris Jackson, left tackle Russell Okung, weakside linebacker K.J. Wright, strongside linebacker Leroy Hill, and running back Marshawn Lynch. They really didn't seem to miss a beat, outside of a few shaky series when Charlie Whitehurst came in cold off the bench, something that can be very expected.
John Schneider and Pete Carroll have churned the bejesus out of this roster and it hasn't gone in vain. They inherited what some people called the worst roster in the NFL and now have assembled a group of players at every position that can step up when the guy in front of them goes down.
Paul McQuistan did it the last few weeks when Robert Gallery went out. Atari Bigby did it last week when Kam Chancellor went out. Walter Thurmond did it this week when Trufant went out. Lemuel Jeanpierre did it this week when Moffitt went out. Ben Obomanu did it this week when Mike Williams went out. Charlie Whitehurst did it this week when Tarvaris went out. Tyler Polumbus came in and played a pretty difficult position when Russell Okung went out, and I didn't notice him screwing up badly so he held his own.
Anthony McCoy struggled early while replacing Miller but came up with a big 20-yard reception in the decisive drive of the 4th quarter to help us all forget the prior few plays. Don't forget that John Carlson was gone before the first game started.
The Seahawks Have Some Fight:
Remember when the Seahawks of the last few years would go down by a touchdown or two and then just roll over? That doesn't seem to be the case anymore. Remember when we couldn't win a damn game on the road on the east coast? Well, that just happened.
The Hawks fought back in the second half of last week's game against Atlanta, down 27-7 early in the third and made a game out of it. This week, they started out quickly before untimely turnovers and bad luck had them down 25-22 late in the game. They stormed back, with a cobbled together offense, and took back the lead. For good. Love to see that fight.
This is a hard-nosed, blue collar style of play. The Hawks aren't finesse. They're frickin BIG. They're nasty. Anthony Hargrove broke through the line and lit up Danny Ware, flat backing him for a safety. That was pretty badass. I can't remember the last safety the Seahawks had.
Kam Chancellor lights people up. Red Bryant has some attitude. He's got that swagger. No one on tha corner has swagga like us. Brandon Mebane is ill. Alan Branch is a bad man. Earl Thomas is everywhere. Leroy Hill is straight up intimidating. Brandon Browner is the most physical tackling corner in the NFL, and I don't need your retort about his pass coverage skills. Who would have thought it would be tough to decide which player on this defense is my favorite?
The Seahawks finally have an identity forming, and it's not of a finesse, high-character group of gentlemen.
The Seahawks Are Exciting:
I remember that Jacson wrote an article in the offseason and said this:
"(The 2009) Seahawks were bad, but worse than that, they were boring. Shortly before the 2010 NFL Draft, my friend asked me if I thought the Seahawks would be any good. I said I didn't think so, but after ‘09 I didn't really care if they were good, as long as they were interesting. I felt like "good" was at least a couple of seasons away, and I've got plenty of experience rooting for teams that aren't good, so I didn‘t mind being patient. I just wanted to have fun watching them play again."
This quote really stuck with me. After the first two games the Hawks played this year, I started to worry about Jacson for that very reason. "Worst team in the NFL." "Internal strife." "No offense, bad defense." "Jeff Reed."
I'm not worried anymore. The last three weeks, I've found myself jumping off the couch fist pumping, hooting and hollering. I've found myself missing high-fives and hugging my friends. I've found myself smiling. Even in that Atlanta loss, I was pretty stoked.
Yes, this team has some holes. Probably, some gigantic holes right now. There's a reason everyone put this team as one of the worst in the NFL at the beginning of the season and why that lasted a few weeks. It will probably return a few times this season if or when they suffer bad losses. That's ok though, it's to be expected with one of the league's youngest and least experienced teams. The point is, this team is interesting again. They're fun to watch. Their games are exciting. Who would have thunk it?
Follow @FieldGulls on Twitter | Like Field Gulls on Facebook
93 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Didn't we get a safety playing last year against the Bears?
Eternally looking forward to someone making a Seahawks song based off of Lil' Jon's "Shots" song named "Hawks!"
i think the last safety was either last october or 2009.
another article had that stat, but with my memory, i can’t remember which year they said. I think it was most likely last year.
There was definitely one in the Chicago regular season game last year
Cutler fumbled in the end zone and recovered for the safety. One of the introduction plays to the bandit package.
by SmartAssCoug on Oct 10, 2011 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions
One issue I think is basically settled...
is the PC/JC approach to building the roster. They have been doing it from the back to the front. They made the first order of business to raise the overall quality of players 40-53. That’s what all the roster churn is about. I don’t agree with every single move. (There’s been so many I don’t think that’s possible.) But in the broad strokes, they have been exactly right to do it that way. If you’re going to build a better sundae you don’t start with the cherry.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on Oct 10, 2011 8:26 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
They inherited a falling-down house
They knocked out all the dead wood, sold off all the parts that wouldn’t fit in the new design and then spent (or tried to spend) big on a few key foundational pieces (LT, FS, big WR, workhorse RB). They filled in the rest with Tyvek and newspaper until they had the ability to bring in more talent. This year, they finally put in the drywall, got a nice granite countertop and a chandelier or two but the house still isn’t quite finished.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 6 recs
As opposed to TR
who apparently replaced a mansion with a double wide while no on was looking.
by Harvey Manfrengenson on Oct 10, 2011 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Or bought expensive aluminum siding when the roof needed fixing
and the foundation had issues.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Missing out on Vickerson was a disappointment.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
This might be my favorite game in quite awhile. We were competitive away against a national brand.
That so rarely happens.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
Danny, I totally agree with your sentiments here.
This team has been exciting, it’s got some heart, it’s not perfect but will surprise people along the way.
My confession, however, is this: I had already mentally prepared myself for a season of sucking. I had written off victories and set up bench marks of minimal progress with individual players as sign-posts for the future. I had built up hopes that we would be in the Suck for Luck conversation (or another legit QBOTF). So now that we show some IMMEDIATE potential, I’m feeling a bit jerked around. I’m actually worried that we might make the playoffs this year and screw up our draft…how messed up is that?
It was just intense, and it was ball, and it was juice. The juice level in that room was high, and it was awesome.
Yeah, I would hate to make the playoffs two years in a row,
shove it to the Rams and Cardinals who think they have the finishing pieces in, and keep fighting the 49ers like they slept with our wife. It sucks caring week in and week out asking our guys to just “get it”, and seeing them do exactly that. I hate that I’m going to go into every week expecting us to win, and expecting our lines to put the hurting on the other team – serious hurt. I hate being a dangerous team.
No wait, disregard all that.
by Stay Off the Flowers on Oct 10, 2011 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
If we make the playoffs
then next years’ draft won’t matter so much.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
Very messed up
Screw draft position. You play to win the game.
by lemonverbena on Oct 10, 2011 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Seattle started this season losing a game
they should have won. Now they won a game that on paper they had no business winning. Along the way they lost badly in Pittsburgh, and won ugly at home against Arizona.
What was the catalyst? It was Atlanta. When a very good team like the Falcons ( who whipped your monkey ass last year) takes a 20 point lead on you at home, a lot of really bad teams would simply pack it in. Not Seattle. No, the Seahawks did not win that game but something changed in this team.
One can now look at teh remaining schedule and see a possible .500 record this year. In pre0season that kind of talk was mocked and rightfully so but not any more. This team has just gone from really, really bad to fair….to exciting.
Game balls yesterday – Red Bryant, Doug Baldwin.
Since there aren't enough game balls to go around,
They need to be renamed the Jon Ryan Award of Awesomeness. Because Jon Ryan was MVP like yesterday.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
There are enough game balls to go around,
they’re just greased up little piggies that we can’t hang onto.
by Stay Off the Flowers on Oct 10, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
Don't forget Hauschka and those touchbacks!
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
God yes, he was pretty awesome
How many balls did we down inside the 20? the 10? THE 5?!?!?!
Ryan gave us great field position all day. Now if only he hadn’t cut those flowing locks of power…
Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence lies in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
-Sun Tzu-
I dunno. We came close to stealing the game in SF
but up until they let the foot off the gas mentally it was all SF. The improvement’s felt somewhat linear so far, but the mistakes, the penalties, to go along with the signs of encouragement means it’s a young but somewhat talented team.
I thought Red was practically a non-factor. The Giants were able to block him with just a TE at least 6 times. The reason our run defense was good: Kevin Booth and David Diehl didn’t play so well, Will Beatty played decently but made several mistakes because he’s a young backup, and then Brandon Mebane and David Hawthorne. Their pulling man-block system against our 1-gap front seven (with Red Bryant being the only 2-gap exception) made it somewhat easy for Hawthorne to just clean up. I bet if they kept one of their very talented wideouts on the sidelines a dozen times, or even their very good blocking TEs, and put a FB in, they would have ran about as well as we did.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Oct 10, 2011 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Honestly, the only negative for me from yesterdays game
was Aaron Curry.
I mean pretty much everyone else seems to have bought in (or at least pretending to be) but he looked completely lost/disinterested/unmotivated.
I still hope we’re going to see something from him, but must admit that hope is fading.
Curry used to make me froth at the mouth in August 2009.
Now he does again, for a completely opposite reason.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
by Cheddar28 on Oct 10, 2011 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
That would mean he had some potential to tap
At this point he is physically gifted, but lacks football potential.
For reference:
Mason Foster (SR) – 163 Tackles (106 solo), 6.5 Sacks, 3 PD, 2 Forced fumbles
Aaron Curry (SR) – 105 Tackles (66 solo), 2.5 Sacks, 1 Int, 4 PD, 1 FR, 1 Forced fumble
It’s easy to say in hindsight, but I was always suspicious of Curry as he fit the mold of physically gifted but didn’t play as well as you would expect given those gifts. This is even more true when compared to Foster (though to be fair, his numbers were better than say David Hawthorne’s in some regards).
As a Husky fan
that is so discouraging…
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
Oh wait those are senior year numbers. Never mind!
I thought those were their NFL numbers to date.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
Which would be very stupid in and of itself.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
I wanted him so bad
Mason Foster makes all the tackles.
by lemonverbena on Oct 10, 2011 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
They pretty much gave him the keys to the defense with the Bucs already
Wasn’t the plan, but he’s now an every-down MLB and playcaller
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Oct 10, 2011 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions
He seems like a more physically gift Lofa to me
Which is pretty high praise. Based on production, Foster was a steal in the draft.
I'm done being emotionally invested in holdovers from a prior failure.
Time to focus on the future – KJ Wright and Malcom Smith when they come in.
by Stay Off the Flowers on Oct 10, 2011 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Wright doesn't look like the real deal moving forward...maybe patience is in order however.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
Limiting Penalties
Would take this team to another level, for various reasons. Obviously part of the reason why this team is so exciting is because of their youth, but their youth also may be a catalyst to the high number of penalties. I think once the team starts mentally maturing, this team could really be a cohesive unit in all three phases of the games. The announcers, although crappy, alluded to this as being a reason why the Steelers are so effective – they an ability to have synergy between the offense, defense, and ST. Having a team that makes less mistakes will sustain momentum. Hopefully that happens soon.
I expected this team to struggle early and then hit it's stride later in the season
It makes sense, given the number of new and young parts and the shortened offseason, but they just struggled more than I expected them to. It looks, now, like they’re starting to “gel” and that the young OL may very well end up becoming a strength of the team, rather than a glaring liability. It’s important to remember than NFL teams aren’t static, that both the talent and execution can develop over the course of a season.
We’re still not “there” there yet, but it’s really encouraging to see some fight in the guys after a lousy start.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 9:31 AM PDT reply actions
I don't think I'm buying that the OL is starting to gel.
They’ve had three starting left guards, Carpenter has seen some rotation with Giacomini and Moffitt missed time in the middle of the game. When would they have had time to get used to each other?
I think the team, as a whole, is gelling and that the OL is likely improving
but it’s fair to say that there hasn’t been enough consistency on the OL to say that it has “gelled” yet. We’ve installed a new offense with a ton of new parts and have a few new faces on defense that are probably still letting the schemes sink in and building chemistry. Also, I haven’t seen games 3 and 4 yet but I imagine that Pete’s letting Bevell open things up a bit after a very conservative start.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm honestly not sure what it is.
This was a really bad team for 3 1/2 games, but they came out against Atlanta in the second half and looked like an honest to god football team. That the offense would be good when the young line gelled was predestined but to me it doesn’t fit what we’ve seen. It’s probably some combination of opening it up after being embarassed in the first half of the Atlanta game, the no huddle helping Tarvy feel more comfortable, Sidney Rice being awesome, Moffitt seems to be settling in and Okung seems to be returning to form a little bit each week.
My untrained eye tells me that if nothing else, the OL guys are winning their individual battles more regularly
There have been occasionally let downs against edge speed rushers, but the middle seems to be holding up unless they get overloaded. McQuistan has looked better than Gallery the last few weeks, and I’m now willing to admit that Unger is not the liability I was expecting him to be.
It also doesn’t look like we’re keeping the TEs in to block nearly as much as we had been, which i take as a pretty big indication of growing confidence in the unit.
Then again, it won’t surprise me if Thomas or Danny look at the tape again and tell me it’s all in my head…
by SmartAssCoug on Oct 10, 2011 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm surprised Unger hasn't gotten more love around here.
On an offensive line that’s desperately needed some consistency he’s been solid.
Unger wasn't good in 2009 so he'll be bad always and forever
Also, solid OL play can be easily overlooked.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions
Nah, I'm sold on Unger now.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
I'll happily concede that in this case, the crow taste delicious
It is worth noting, however, that a lot of the Tarvaris perceptions could also be broken down to “Jackson wasn’t good in 2007 so he’ll be bad always and forever” as well.
by SmartAssCoug on Oct 10, 2011 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Good call. I think he's been the best lineman.
Moffitt next. I do think they’ve improved a lot, and the best part is it doesn’t seem to be because “gelling” is necessary. I mean, I think it is important, it helps, but it’s not been the catalyst here. I think they are, individually, playing zone blocking better. The peel offs have been very effective. I didn’t see any mistakes in handing a guy off. Okung picked up a stunt when the Giants overloaded our right side, with absolute ease.
They just get in the way of someone, and one guy has to move someone out. And he is able to because he surprises the defender, comes at him from the side when he’s prepared to battle the guy in front of him.
They’re ZBSing well. Moffitt’s replacement was most glaringly beaten, and there was a glaring Carpenter whiff that turned into a sack. I suppose that might have been a handoff issue, now that I think about it, but I think it was straightforward who he should have blocked.
Now I get why lighter linemen can be so good at zone blocking. You don’t have to defeat a bigger guy who’s defending the ground he’s set up at, you get in the way of him being where he should. I thought Unger was too light, too tall. But he’s not bad.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Oct 10, 2011 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions
It used to be when the Hawks went down by two scores you could write the game off.
2008 and 2009 especially had me questioning if the $300 a season I spent on NFL Sunday Ticket. At one point I wondered if it might not be better to spend sundays hitting myself in the head with a ball peen hammer (which might have been less painful.) This year has been a breathe of fresh air, and I think sundays game was worth the $300 alone. No matter they win or lose, at least they keep you on the edge of your seat.
I bought in!!!
The blowouts last year were pretty bad
I’m not sure if we’re more competitive this year due to offensive scheme (more consistent production), talent, more time in the system or just luck, but I’m glad to see it.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Have to Love
A team that runs a faster tempo offense, a very close to Ferocious defense, and a game you can’t write off in the second quarter.
I’m really glad too, because deep down inside, this team will be exciting all season long.
Confidence + Luck + Hungry Talent== anything is possible.
Live work and breathe like an optimist.
"Confidence + Luck + Hungry Talent== anything is possible."
It’s over dude. We’re not getting Luck.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
by hazbro24 on Oct 10, 2011 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
To fully understand your sarcasm
What does the text in the gray box signify?
by SquawkMantra on Oct 10, 2011 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Just that my original post was in complete jest.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
The biggest turnaround
For me from last year is the coaching staff. For them to make these type of crucial adjustments is huge for me. Bevell is doing a terrific job of switching up the offense to suit whats going on. Teams were stacking the box against our I formation and it was a breathe of fresh air to see so many draws out of he shotgun
by Bruto56 on Oct 10, 2011 9:43 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Wearing my gear with pride again
Last few years were tough to be a fan, esp. down here in SoCal. I have a few bars that show every game, and the Hawks game is always the smallest TV, usually in some dark corner. They would look at my shirt and hat with distain, and roll their eyes, and ask why I supported such a crappy team…
Those days are over baby!
We are YOUNG, BIG, and NASTY!
We still make a large number of mistakes, penalties, mental goofs, and the such, but I get the feeling that the other teams have taken notice. I think they see that we are going to be bringing it with a phsicality that never used to exist in Seattle teams. (Thanks Timmah) Pete and John have gone to the nth degree to ferret out whimpy players, and now there are nothing but big slabs of meat, ready to ring your bell. I don’t think anyone is going to be looking forward to that.
I preached that we needed to pass first, and the run game would open up, and that is exactly what happened. We are now playing like the big boys.
Depth is good, and things are starting to fall into place. We are still under-rated, but after we win the next 3 games that will change.
Curry is killing me, and I guess i am about the only one who still thinks we would do better with Charlie at the helm now that the line is beginning to offer some protection. I don’t totally dislike TJ, but i think his accuracy isn’t as good, and I think he leads his receivers into dangerous hits sometimes, but i’m not crying either way.
Final analysis is that yay, the boys are ballin, and they are exciting to watch again!!
WAR HAWKS
out on the east coast (jersey city/nyc)
I know what you mean. Every bar i’ve gone to, the Seahawks have always been in the dimly lit corner where you had to cock your head in just the right position in order to see the game. Last week, someone came up to me and the only other seahawks fan at the bar and said, “you’re rooting for the Seahawks?” After affirming that, he just said, “God bless you” and walked away.
the only reason why they were on the big screen was b/c they were playing the giants.
i didn't think they would be that good this year
The jury is still going to be out on how good this team is since we are heading into just week 6, but we are definitely heading in the right direction.
I was really thinking that next year or the following we would be seeing the resilient play we saw yesterday against the giants. I remember all those previous teams where if one thing went badly, everything just went downhill from there. It’s great to see the Seahawks fielding this young talent and an emphasis on keeping the team competitive for the future.
all those saying suck for luck
it’s not all about talent. please keep this under consideration
it starts with attitude..we got it
it starts with passion.. we finally got it(05)
it starts with confidence, faith, and perseverance… we’re on the way there
something tells me even without luck we will find that qbotf. we need to stick to this management instead of giving up when the going gets down.
there’s plenty of teams with talent on paper that failed. the biggest that i can recall was the superbowl team oakland raiders lead by gannon.
in the meantime. PLEASE A WRITEUP on mebane this game. i didn’t get to watch the entire game but when it was Game time. mebane looked to be getting in the backfield over and over again this game
I rewatched the first quarter and he was getting good push and playing well.
It’s all about talent though. The talented Raiders team that lost a super bowl? They lost to one of the best defenses in NFL history, headlined by John Lynch, Derrick Brooks, Warren Sapp and Ronde Barber. Attitude is great, but you don’t win without talent.
Led by the pioneer of their defensive scheme.
Talent – Coaching = 2011 Philadelphia Eagles
by Stay Off the Flowers on Oct 10, 2011 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The playbook
Some people have mentioned it and I just wanted to add to that. The biggest difference I’ve noticed from the first three weeks to the last two weeks was the playbook. We won an ugly conservative game against Arizona. Maybe there wasnt much trust yet in the offense to open up the playbook, but we won regardless. After we fell behind in the Falcons game, it was just amazing to see this transformation. Seahawks were hitting screens, Tarvaris throw some nice deep passes, Baldwin and Sidney Rice tore it up. Then in this game with some bubble screens (to me Seattle never had these plays or were never successful at it) QB option runs. I’m amazed at the night and day difference in the playcalling. But happily surprised :)
by Nicoya on Oct 10, 2011 10:51 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Not losing because of injuries is an odd and unfamiliar feeling but I like it. I would really like to see what Robert Gallery will bring to the offensive line.
Also that was very true what Jacson said. It’s like the Carolina Panthers and Cam Newton right now.
follow @casetines
by Kenneth Arthur on Oct 10, 2011 11:58 AM PDT reply actions
If we want Luck, we might have to start rooting for Luck to Suck
Because I don’t see this team finishing with the worst overall record. Aint happening
by galvinx10 on Oct 10, 2011 12:04 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The chances of Luck were always slim-to-none
You have to be real, real bad to get that first pick.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Okay, then....let's not want Luck.
But if we REALLY want him, let’s just squint our eyes real real hard and chant “suck for Luck” over and over again, because it will impact everything.
by Stay Off the Flowers on Oct 10, 2011 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Most optomistic vibe in a long long time around here
The best part is is I dont think its delusional
by southern oregon on Oct 10, 2011 12:22 PM PDT reply actions
The only thing I see
Unger needs to snap better.
If you look, he has a lot of low snaps and one high snap that really stands out. However, he is blocking good. I think its more of a tiny bit of patience needed as he has to snap and immediately go get his assignment.
I also think he knows this too.
Earl Thomas, future HOFer
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it!
Isn't Hill a SAM linebacker
And we also lost him at the 4th quarter as well.
We are safely a Julius Jones average team with upside.
Don't be an idiot. If an idiot would do that, then don't do it.
Yeah, you're right, thanks!
"Scored a Deer Head" - Scruffy Lefty
Field Gulls | Follow me on the Twitters
Most everytime the other team runs on the Hawks it proves to be a mistake.
Thank you, I say. Run another, you fool.
However different from Mora’s defense that was gauged up the gut with regularity.
by broadbill birdwatcher on Oct 10, 2011 2:33 PM PDT reply actions
Teams aren't running up the gut or to Bryant's side very successfully.
Even when they do run away from him, he can affect the play from backside pursuit.
Can we give the D-Coordinator some love? The Seahawks D has been monstrous in the second half of their games.
Bizarrely we're like second-most in run attempts against or something
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Oct 10, 2011 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Is that because teams are getting ahead and then trying to chew up clock?
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, the Niners were incredibly run-heavy that game
I just didn’t think that a single game would have all that much of an effect (but it may be early enough to).
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 10, 2011 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Can't be because of the Bandit or other PassD looks?
I can’t remember seeing drastic changes in personnel except near the goal line
We've yet to play a non-run-oriented offense, really.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Oct 10, 2011 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Up next:
A disoriented offense.
by Stay Off the Flowers on Oct 10, 2011 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
































