Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

A Proposal For An Alternate NFL Playoff System

I remember last year's criticism of the Seattle Seahawks: "No team with a losing record should be in the playoffs!"  This is probably true.  In fact, I'd go so far as to argue that every team should hit a minimum standard before they reach the playoffs.  Why should 8-8 division winners go when the occasional 10-6 team stays home without a wild card berth?

And so, I offer up an alternate playoff system.  It's simple: Every team that reaches ten wins gets to go to the playoffs.  Every team with nine or fewer wins stays home.  Elegant in its simplicity.  You can even keep the current division structure, which would facilitate existing rivalries.

I can think of a few objections to this:

Star-divide

(1) Teams that have won 10 games will slack off.  Yeah, but teams that have already clinched a playoff spot will slack anyway.  Really, if Green Bay gets to 10-0 this year, do you think they'll be playing any harder? 

But then, that first round bye an be real valuable, can't it?  And the best seeded teams are going to get those byes.  If you clinch in week 14 at 10-3, you don't know if those additional victories will or won't buy you a bye round.  And beating good teams can keep them out of the playoffs and away from your pursuit for the title.  I think there's actually less chance of slacking in this system.

And then there's the flipside benefit: You don't have to worry about the league's arcane tiebreaker system anymore.  So when the networks are scheduling for week 17, they'll know who they want to put up for those Sunday and Monday night games.  They get the certainty of having matchups that matter.

(2) There will be way more playoff teams.  Nope.  Not going to happen.  the current format has 6 AFC and 6 NFC teams, for a total of 12.  If you go back to 2002, after the last round of expansion, you only have three years (2003, 2005 and 2007, all in the AFC) where you have more than 6 teams from a conference.  The average is 11 teams total between both conferences, and the median is actually 6 per conference.  And really, can you make an argument for keeping that last 10-6 team out?

(3) You'll have too few playoff games.  This is a legitmate critique.  The number of playoff games would usually drop.  Counting up from 2002, of the 18 conference-seasons (AFC and NFC for each season) we find the following number of teams at or above 10 wins:

  • 3 teams: 2 times
  • 4 teams: 4 times
  • 5 teams: 2 times
  • 6 teams: 7 times
  • 7 teams: 3 times

You'll get fewer games anytime there are fewer than 6 teams in a conference.  You'll get fewer weeks of playoffs whenever only four teams qualify.  Certainly, neither the NFL, nor the networks, would appreciate the lost revenue from a reduction in games played.  However, the increase in the quality of those games, plus the increased relevance of weeks 16 and 17, should offset that potential problem.

Such a system offers serious benefits to the NFL, in terms of advancing the level of play in the league and cutting undeserving teams out of the playoffs.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

How would that work?

Last season that would have made 7 playoff teams in the NFC.
Two years ago that would have made 4 playoff teams in the AFC.
Three years ago that would have made 4 playoff teams in the NFC.
Four years ago there would have been 7 teams from the AFC and 4 from the NFC.

There’s no balance, it doesn’t take odd numbered amount of teams into account, it doesn’t take into account divisional balance.

Current structure isn’t flawed. At least, its not THAT flawed.

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Nov 18, 2011 3:00 PM PST reply actions  

Odd number of teams is easy

You just have a bye to deal with it. There’s currently a bye week in the NFL anyway. If you have five qualifying teams in a conference, then three teams get a bye the first week, and then you’re down to four. Same thing with seven.

If you get to three or four teams things get a little hinky, because you essentially throw out Wild Card Weekend. In the case of three teams, you get two teams that play Wild Card Weekend, and another that gets a bye to the NFC championship.

Balance? In what way? And why should it matter?

by robbbbbb on Nov 18, 2011 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I hate changing the playoff system

Based on an anomaly that’s only occurred once in the history of the NFL

by B.B.Finnegan on Nov 18, 2011 4:38 PM PST reply actions  

Real question is why?

Lets look at it from and entertainment stand point.
The Tv networks make more money with more play off games.
More games each season = more entertainment
More fan bases involved = more entertainment
More teams involved also gives more hope for “next year”

Lets look at it from an owners stand point.
More games = more money, more exposure to gain more fans.
Parity
Less chance to sign FA

Lets look at it from players stand point.
More experience in pressure situations for more players.
An extra Pay check, bonuses and opportunities to make money.
A chance to shine to more than the local media and fan bases.

From a fans stand point.
less games
less national media hype for your team
Less excitement about next year for the majority of teams
losing great memories like the 2008 Arizona Cardinals dont even make play offs, much less play in one of the most exciting superbowls ever.
No 2010 Beast quake?
No anything can happen cinderella scenarios, that fans love so much.

In all, i dont see any reason to change the format to less games, except to generate more elitism that will eventually trim the league to about 8 major media cities and a failing league. Sounds like a great idea!

by Oliudyen on Nov 18, 2011 4:53 PM PST reply actions  

The only change I would make to the playoff system

is inserting a rule that stipulates 8-8 is the qualifier for division winners. If a division winner comes in under 8-8, that division is ineligible for the playoffs and an additional wildcard spot for that conference takes its place.

by BrianL on Nov 18, 2011 5:13 PM PST reply actions  

I propose that Seattle makes it to the playoffs every year

Without losing good draft position

Watching the Seahawks is like peeing on yourself, everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling it brings

by DKrottenhawk on Nov 18, 2011 6:26 PM PST via mobile reply actions   2 recs

Playoff games are the highest rated.

The biggest money makers on TV. They will never ever ever ever ever ever reduce the number of them no matter what.

If anything they will expand them, and add an additional fantasy season. Players play to win. Coaches coach to win. Teams play to make money.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Nov 18, 2011 6:35 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

ONE MORE WILD CARD

What I want is a seventh team added in each conference. The team that is first in conference deserves a bye but does a 2nd place team deserve it? WE could have three games a day on the Wildcard weekend. Last year it would have gotten the Giants or Tampa in there with 10 win records. Course one team gets screwed but whatever. Go Seahawks.

by Great Sergios Ghost on Nov 20, 2011 6:44 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies