Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Formation Nation: Seattle Seahawks Week 11 Notes on Personnel Packages & Player Snaps

Back at it again this week with some notes and thoughts on the Seahawks use of personnel and offensive/defensive scheming against the Rams on Sunday. Big thanks to Chad Davis of DraftBreakdown.com for charting the game - it's a big undertaking and it's much appreciated.

Without further ado, here we go. The Hawks ran 68 offensive plays this week, one more than last week if you're not counting kneel downs. Two straight weeks with 65+ offensive plays is a good thing, and the time of possession is showing that improvement. The Hawks had the ball for 35:00, compared to St. Louis' 25:00, and that was just off last week's ToP of 35:01 against the Ravens. Interesting similarities for sure, and encouraging.

This week they used similar run-heavy strategy on offense, rushing it 39 times (57%) and throwing the ball 25 times (while getting sacked 4 times). Last week, they ran the ball 39 times (58%) and threw it 28. Will they keep up this pace? If so, that would probably be the highest run:pass ratio in the NFL outside of Denver.

This week, the Seahawks continued to heavily utilize their tight ends. Only six offensive plays went without them, and thrice the Seahawks trotted three tight ends out on the field, running once and passing twice. The Hawks went with their spread look - 5 wide receivers - 3 times as well, and passed on all three of those plays.

They used a 'no-back' look on four snaps, passing each time, obviously, and used their '10' personnel grouping of one running back and no tight ends three times, running it once and passing twice.

Probably most interesting in these groupings was the heavy use of two running back sets. The Hawks used their '21' and '22' packages 27 times and ran it 22 times out of those formations. Marshawn Lynch's touchdown was one such occasion and Lynch was actually lined up at fullback for that snap, which was an entertaining look.

Here are the groupings:

Offensive Personnel Information

• 3 out of "00" (5 WRs)...3 passes
• 2 out of "01" (0 RB, 1 TE)...2 passes
• 2 out of "02" (0 RB, 2 TE)...2 passes
• 3 out of "10" (1 RB, 0 TE)...1 run, 2 passes
• 15 out of "11" (1 RB, 1 TE)...8 runs, 7 passes
• 13 out of "12" (1 RB, 2 TE)...5 runs, 8 passes, including Sidney Rice's TD.
• 3 out of "13" (1 RB, 3 TE)...2 runs, 1 pass
• 14 out of "21" (2 RB, 1 TE)...10 runs, 4 passes
• 13 out of "22" (2 RB, 2 TE)...12 runs, 1 pass, including Marshawn Lynch's TD.

Notable Snap Counts:

Again, the offensive line snap counts are omitted because there were no substitutions there this week. The first thing you may notice is the diminished role of Mike Williams in the Seahawks' offense this week. Williams saw only 31 of 68 snaps, down from 55/67 last week. He wasn't injured, as far as I saw, so this is definitely something to keep an eye on. He was targeted a team-high (tied with Sidney Rice) five times though, so he made the most of his snaps. It woudn't surprise me to see the Seahawks keep moving in this direction, rotating Golden Tate, Ben Obomanu, and Doug Baldwin in more frequently.

Tate was the biggest beneficiary of the Williams' absence, surprisingly logging 35 snaps, ten more than Baldwin and 11 more than Obomanu. Tate was targeted three times and caught one pass for 16 yards but I expect the Seahawks are resolute in their desire to develop him.

Another interesting snap count would be that of Michael Robinson, who checked in for 27 plays (most likely his high for this season, though we'd have to double check that with Brian McIntyre's numbers, as he's been keeping track all year). That was a big jump from his 16 snaps last week, and as I noted above, the Hawks have been using their two-back power-I formation more frequently with Robinson lead-blocking for Marshawn Lynch. A possible corollary of this has been the Hawks' improvement on the ground.

Zach Miller saw 57 snaps and 2nd year TE Anthony McCoy checked in for 35. Cameron Morrah played in only four snaps, three of which were the Hawks 3TE looks. Interestingly, the Hawks used at least one tight end on 61 plays but only targeted them once the entire game, a 10-yard Zach Miller completion.

Finally, Justin Forsett saw 11-snaps, many in garbage time, but took advantage by rushing for 31 yards and a touchdown, including his 22-yard scamper into the endzone. Leon Washington upped his snap count by three from last week and saw 7 plays.

Individual Offensive Snaps

• Sidney Rice played in 41 of 68 plays
• Mike Williams played in 31 of 68 plays (down from 55 last week)
• Doug Baldwin played in 25 of 68 plays
• Ben Obomanu played in 24 of 68 plays
• Zach Miller played in 57 of 68 plays
• Anthony McCoy played in 35 of 68 plays
• Cameron Morrah played in 4 of 68 plays
• Golden Tate played in 35 of 68 plays
• Marshawn Lynch played in 43 of 68 plays
• Justin Forsett played in 11 of 68 plays (6 on 3rd downs)
• Leon Washington played in 7 of 68 plays
• Michael Robinson played in 27 of 68 plays (season high?)

On to the defense. The magnificent eleven were on the field for only 61 plays, five fewer than last week. They played out of their base 4-3 on 20 of them, heavily utilizing their nickel package the rest of the time. They eschewed their 'dime' and 'bandit' packages this week despite the Rams' 45 to 17 pass:run ratio. This shows confidence the coaching staff has in their players executing.

Defensive personnel information

• Seattle saw 61 plays on defense
• They were in base 4-3 personnel on 20 plays
• They were in nickel personnel on 41 plays
• They were in never in dime personnel

Notable Snap Counts:

Chris Clemons was a beast, racking up three sacks, three quarterback hits, and two forced fumbles, and he saw 59 of their 61 snaps. Only David Hawthorne, Kam Chancellor, Brandon Browner, and Richard Sherman played all 61 defensive snaps.

Red Bryant moved to the inside again in the nickel package, taking 14 snaps as his originally-projected position of defensive tackle. Love that they're getting creative with the big man. It's interesting to note the use of our 'big-3' of Red Bryant, Brandon Mebane, and Alan Branch - all three are seeing snaps in the nickel (Red 14, Branch 20, and Mebane 24) and are clearly rotating in and out to stay fresh. This seems smart.

Also getting snaps in the rotation at DT were Lazarius Levingston and Clinton McDonald. Pep saw 10 snaps, 2 in base and 8 in the nickel, and McDeezy saw 29 snaps this week, a big jump from last week's total of 17. Great to see, and I think he's been showing a lot of promise in the middle.

K.J. Wright went off on nickel plays, making way for Roy Lewis, who had a bounce back game in my opinion. Raheem Brock rotated in for most nickel plays and a few base plays, logging 44 total snaps.

Individual defensive snap information

• Chris Clemons played in 59 of 61 plays (19 base, 40 nickel)
• Brandon Mebane played in 40 of 61 plays (16 base, 24 nickel)
• Alan Branch played in 30 of 61 plays (10 base, 20 nickel)
• Red Bryant played in 32 of 61 plays (17 base, 15 nickel...14 at DT)
• David Hawthorne played in ALL 61 plays
Leroy Hill played in 54 of 61 plays (19 base, 35 nickel)
• K.J. Wright played in 20 of 61 plays (ALL in base)
• Kam Chancellor played in ALL 61 plays
Earl Thomas played in ALL 61 plays
• Brandon Browner played in ALL 61 plays
• Richard Sherman played in ALL 61 plays
• Raheem Brock played in 44 of 61 plays (5 base, 39 nickel)
• Clinton McDonald played in 29 of 61 plays (11 base, 18 nickel...season high?)
• Pep Levingston played in 10 of 61 plays (2 base, 8 nickel)
Malcolm Smith played in 7 of 61 plays (1 base, 6 nickel)
• Roy Lewis played in 41 of 61 plays (ALL in nickel)

That's what we got for this week. Again, big ups to Chad Davis (follow him here) of DraftBreakdown.com for doing the legwork on this. I honestly can't get enough of these kinds of numbers, so it's hugely appreciated.

Comment 17 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The TE's

I’m glad to see Morrah get some snaps and for Miller to get some breaks. I know Morrah only saw time in the 3TE sets, but this should change as we go on. It seems Miller has been playing every snap a lot and the Seahawks ask a lot of him.

by brugg on Nov 22, 2011 9:10 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Red's split sack

That big boy showed some pass rush ability! From the looks of it, he was lined up at the 3-tech, and was two-gapping. He stood his ground initially because of the play-action. As soon as it was apparent that Bradford was dropping back, he blew past the poor guard, who passed him to the tackle as Brock appeared to run a delayed stunt to the inside. The tackle never had a chance.

Boom baby.

It’d be nice to see if this was just a fluke play against a crappy and beat-up O-line, or if the big guy can actually continue to generate some solid pressure from the inside.

by Matt Erickson on Nov 22, 2011 9:29 AM PST reply actions  

Tate is better at doing the "small things" now?

Hope he continues to do the little things that keep him on the field as I do see him as a difference maker in the coming years.

I am not sure if TJax and BMW will get on the same page. TJax is just not good at the type of throws that take advantage of BMW’s skills. That is a relationship that really misses the practice time.

by goatweed on Nov 22, 2011 9:40 AM PST reply actions  

Im not sure how the percentages in the third paragraph are working.

Rounding to nearest percent…
39/64= 61%
39/67= 58%
These numbers more line up with what the paragraph is meaning, than 60 and 63 respectively

by Oliudyen on Nov 22, 2011 9:43 AM PST reply actions  

Wow, I'm dyslexic.

That was meant to be ‘21’ and ‘22’ personnel (two running backs). Looked at the wrong numbers there.

And yep, my math was awful in paragraph three – i fixed it 39/68 Week 11, 39/67 week 10. Sheesh, thanks, I’ll try to get that stuff cleaned up.

by Danny Kelly on Nov 22, 2011 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

On the run-pass ratio:

Pete said yesterday in the press conference that he wanted to stress balance in the offense and that that might require going run-heavy for a while to get the run game going, but that he expected the ratio to even out more by the end of the year.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Nov 22, 2011 10:26 AM PST reply actions  

Ah, yes that makes sense.

Interesting. They might be protecting Tjack as much as possible too at this point…

by Danny Kelly on Nov 22, 2011 10:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Given the way Tjack was playing in the two quarters spanning the second half of the Atlanta game and the first half of the Giants game

I’d really like to see him completely healthy again. This pec injury is annoying. I don’t at all consider him a QBotF candidate, but I do believe he is showing potential and ability beyond anything he’s demonstrated in the past. It gives me a measure of confidence in him as a potential starter next year that could allow them to draft a high-upside type like Griffin or Tannehill, as opposed to Barkley or Luck.

by Matt Erickson on Nov 22, 2011 11:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Tom Cable may be inserting his will a little bit here too.

He is, after all, the assistant head coach and I’m sure he has some say in the game plans. He wants to run the ball more than anything so we may be seeing his philosophies creeping in a bit more.

by ChadDavis45 on Nov 22, 2011 11:03 AM PST up reply actions  

That would be Pete's influence more than Cable

Pete brought in Cable and drafted the 2 OL early because he wants a working run game.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Nov 22, 2011 11:31 AM PST up reply actions  

True

But they made no bones about the fact that those were “Cable’s guys” that they drafted. The organization as a whole believes in a strong run game so it’s no surprise the ratio has gone that way.

by ChadDavis45 on Nov 22, 2011 11:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Mixup:
Tate was the biggest beneficiary of the Williams’ absence, surprisingly logging 35 snaps, ten more than Durham and 11 more than Obomanu.

I think you meant Baldwin, not Durham.

Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.

by Nick Andron on Nov 22, 2011 2:09 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies