Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

The Green Bay Model and its Influence on John Schneider Part I

ARLINGTON TX - FEBRUARY 06:  Green Bay Packers General Manager Ted Thompson celebrates after winning Super Bowl XLV 31-25 against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

John Schneider took the call he was looking for.

On Day 2 of the 2011 NFL Draft, Schneider found the willing counterparty seeking to move up and grant him the extra 4th round pick he desired in Day 3. He moved out of the 2nd Round - Pick 57 - down to the 3rd Round - Pick 75. He netted an extra 4th round pick for his efforts and a few slots up the board in Round 5.

Schneider took John Moffitt at 75 (some have rumored he would have taken him at 57). Detroit drafted RB Mikel Leshoure at 57- which some draft experts fancied as the 2nd best RB in the Draft.

Detroit walked away from the 2011 Draft with 5 picks. The top end looked pretty solid with DT Nick Fairley in Round 1, WR Titus Young in Round 2, and the afformentioned Mikel Leshoure. Detroit was saying, 'we want impact players,' not just bodies. They knew with Stafford healthy, they could compete with Megatron, Ndamukong Suh, Cliff Avril, Louis Delmas, Jahvid Best and more. In 2010 Detroit traded up into the bottom of Round 1 for the speedy Best in a similar style move.

Trades can be a beautiful thing. A team that has many holes to fill can trade down and add more players to fill the many holes. A team that feels like it would rather have fewer, but likely more talented and higher impact players, can move up.

Atlanta felt that Julio Jones was an explosive talent that could vault them into the arena to battle Green Bay. Cleveland - a team in rebuild said - 'a first, a second, a fourth, another first, and another fourth...ok...done.' That trade may turn out to be a win-win if Julio can help Atlanta over the hump in the playoffs, and Atlanta looks to be headed to the playoffs in 2011.

Green Bay had waxed Atlanta in their house, putting the Falcon's balanced/ball control offense in a bind by being behind several scores. Green Bay, fresh off a Super Bowl victory, walked into the 2011 Draft with nine picks. They had one in each round plus an extra 4th and an extra 7th. They had the worst possible draft position, the last pick in every round. This was a team without many holes, yet instead of walking off with five really good players (which I probably would have done) Ted Thompson walked out of the draft with ten picks.

In fact - Ted Thompson TRADED DOWN 3 times.

The final result of the Draft (again, in theory the Packers should have the worst draft in the NFL because they are picking last in every round):

Star-divide

Rd 1- Derek Sherrod OT
Rd 2- Randall Cobb WR
Rd 3- Alex Green RB
Rd 4- (Traded pick 129 to Denver- basically traded a 4th and a 7th for a 5th and a 6th- or put another way- they moved down 12 slots from the bottom of round 4 into the top of round 5 and moved up 18 slots from the top of round 7 to the bottom of round 6)
Rd 4- Davon House CB (pick 131)
Rd 5- D.J. Williams TE (pick 141- this is the 5th they got from Denver- and DJ Williams was the 2010 John Mackey Award Winner)
Rd 5- (Traded pick 163 to San Francisco for a 6th and a 7th)
Rd 6- (Traded pick 174- which they just got from San Francisco to Miami. GB moved down from 174 to 179 in exchange for a swap of 7th rd picks, GB moved up in Rd 7 from 231 (which they just received from San Fran) to 218)
Rd 6- Caleb Schlauderaff G
Rd 6- D.J. Smith LB
Rd 6- Ricky Elmore DE
Rd 7- Ryan Taylor TE/FB
Rd 7- Lawrence Guy DT

I checked today - Lawrence Guy and Alex Green are on the IR. Ricky Elmore was cut. Schlauderaff was traded to the Jets in September for an undisclosed draft pick (wondering aloud what the Jets paid for this). All the rest of the players are on the Active Roster - and Ryan Taylor was a guy the Seahawks were interested in pre-Draft as well.

I mean, check this out - who trades DOWN 12 slots in Rd 4 to move up 18 slots in Rd 6? I wouldn't! But Ted Thompson did, why? He knew his draft board inside and out. Did Thompson know that D.J. Williams would still be sitting there at pick 141 instead of pick 129? We will never know for sure, but that is my bet. And 2011 was not the first time Thompson has done this.

Ted Thompson took over the Green Bay Draft in 2005. He had previously set up the Draft Board for the Seahawks and Mike Holmgren for a few years, and bagged players like Shaun Alexander, Steve Hutchinson, and Marcus Trufant.

In 2004, pre-Ted Thompson, Green Bay had 6 draft picks.

In 2005, Green Bay was drafting late as the 2004 Packers had gone 10-6 and won the division under Favre. They walked out of that draft with 11 picks. (two 2s, two 4s, two 5s, two 6s, two 7s- they only had one pick in round 1, but made that one count). One of the 2s was Nick Collins.

In 2006, Green Bay drafted 12 times. (two 2s, two 3s, two 4s, two 5s, two 6s) Players of note- AJ Hawk, Daryn Colledge, Greg Jennings.

In 2007, Green Bay drafted 11 times. Players of note include- Mason Crosby, Desmond Bishop, James Jones, (Allen Barbre!).

in 2008, Green Bay drafted 9 times. Players of note include- Jordy Nelson, Jermichael Finley, Josh Sitton, Matt Flynn, (Breno Giacomini!)

In 2009, Green Bay drafted 8 times. This was the draft where GB was converting to a 3-4 defense and needed to get their edge rusher, so they traded up back into Round 1 to get Clay Matthews. They had previously selected B.J. Raji in Round 1. They also obtained T.J. Lang.

In 2010, Green Bay drafted 7 times. Players of note were Brian Bulaga, Mike Neal, Morgan Burnett, Marshall Newhouse, and James Starks.

In summary - under Ted Thompson, Green Bay has averaged 9.7 picks per draft over seven drafts. (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11, 12).
________________________

John Schneider has referred to Ted Thompson as more of an "older brother" figure. The "father figure" to Schneider has been Ron Wolf. Yet, part of the appeal to Paul Allen, I assume, was that Schneider would bring to Seattle the Green Bay philosophy.

In the end, we all know that Pete Carroll makes the final decisions, but I think Pete Carroll wants the Green Bay philosophy to bleed through. They will be more active in free agency than Green Bay, but I believe there is still a strong emphasis on the Draft. In fact, in 2010 and 2011 PCJS drafted nine times each. Throw in Charlie Whitehurst, Lendale White, and Leon Washington and we are pretty close to the Green Bay average of 9.7. Charlie and Lendale are worth half a player each. (That was a joke- it's ok to laugh).

In part II I will explore trading up for a Quarterback and what it takes to stay "Forever Young" as a roster. Stay Tuned.

Comment 48 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting

with so much emphasis put on ‘get up there GET UP THERE OR WE’RE DEAD MEAT’, to see a successful formula run by Thompson seems to be crazy.
Crazy’s worked so far.

Nice write up, rec’d.

Heresy grows from idleness.

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Nov 30, 2011 8:50 AM PST reply actions  

It's interesting to note

That the very first pick that they made under Ted Thompson was a 1st round QB. In my mind, everything kind of flows from there.

by Kingdomer on Nov 30, 2011 8:56 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Also worth mentioning the circumstances did more to set that up than philosophy or intent.

Had Rodgers not fallen so far, or had Smith been the one to fall instead, how would things have turned out then?

It’s still very remarkable to me how great Rodgers has turned out. I think his success truly beats out what most folks thought his ceiling of potential was. But don’t forget they have a still-underrated game & system-design coach and a fantastic set of receivers. Rodgers is playing at a level probably very few could achieve in the most optimal situation, but it’s still an optimal situation.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 9:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Nice article; I've long been waiting for a detailing of the TT-JS connection.

People always talk about the Bill Walsh coaching tree and the success stories that have followed from him, perhaps we are watching the FO equivalent.

Not that I have any vast knowledge on the subject, but IMHO, the success that Thompson has had in Seattle and then on to Green Bay could potentially make him one of the best drafters in the history of the game. As well and though still quite early, looking at the past two drafts it seems he has mentored one heck of a protégé to continue his growing legacy.

Often you hear of teams looking for the "next new thing" in front office management; I believe we may have found it. Fortunately for us, it seems that we got in Josh Schneider what Denver was hoping to get in Josh McDaniels.

by Dizzy Saturn on Nov 30, 2011 9:08 AM PST reply actions  

Mike Holmgren sure had a ton of very talented people working for him.

Coaches and front office folk. And from what I gather, pretty much everyone deferred to him. Talk about an alpha dog. Had quite an eye for talent — offensive, coaching & front office talent. Defensive, not so much. But maybe that will be different in Cleveland.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 9:49 AM PST reply actions  

So far their defensive picks have been pretty solid

2010 draft:

Joe Haden is a complete stud

TJ Ward is a dang good safety …heck rookie year: 123 tackles, 95 solo, 10pd and 2int …not bad for a small rookie FS

2011 draft:

Phil Taylor has shown the potential to be dominant

Jabaal Sheard looks to be a steal in round 2 and has been a terror off the edge

Those are 4 extremely solid picks in his 2 seasons of drafting. Heck, better than he ever did for us! Defensively. He had I think 3 or 4 other defensive picks 3 are still on the team as a backup and another I don’t see him on the roster…. was a SS

by DSAhawker on Nov 30, 2011 10:28 AM PST up reply actions  

The opinion of Thompson seems to be in very high regard right now.

Someone on here once described him factually as the greatest talent evaluator ever in football. Seems a bit hyped. With a greater sample size I wonder how he’ll continue to look.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 9:56 AM PST reply actions  

Personnel moves can look great in the 1st year, lousy in the second, great again in the 3rd and horrible 5 years after the fact

Thompson looks great, now, when his team is doing great but didn’t look all that hot in the year or two after Favre departed(/got the boot). In a year or two, the Packers may look like a flash in the pan or a dynasty.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Nov 30, 2011 10:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Can we flash in that pan? PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE?

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 10:51 AM PST up reply actions  

We didn't reach the heights that the Packers recently have

but we had a pretty good run during Ruskell’s tenure where we had a good chance at a ring (2005, 2006, 2007).

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Nov 30, 2011 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes.

The combination of the offense taking so long to develop and the injury years stopping the window short while the personnel strategy was chips in now to win now.

Sometimes a complete rebuild is logistically almost easier than building upon partial or flawed foundation.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

*Coughs* Marino-era Dolphins *Coughs*

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 1:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Ted Thompson built the core of those teams

players on the superbowl roster
FA
*Matt Hasselbeck
*Marquand Manuel
*Robbie Tobeck
*Bobby Engram
Draft
2000
*1-Shaun Alexander
*3-Darrell Jackson
4-I Kacyvenski (not a starter, but the special teams captain and backup LB)
2001
*1-S Hutchinson (let go by Ruskell’s mistake)
2-K Lucas (not resigned by Ruskell before the 2005 season)
4-F Womack (backup tackle)
2002
*1-J Stevens
2-M Morris
*5-R Bernard
*UDFA-DD Lewis
2003
*1-M Trufant
2-K Hamlin
*7-J Brown
2004
*2-M Boulware
*3-S Locklear

Ruskell certainly put his stamp on the Superbowl team with the 2005 draft (Tatupu, Leroy Hill) and FA signings (Andre Dyson, G. Wistrom, Chartric Darby), but most of the talent came from Thompson and Holmgren.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Nov 30, 2011 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

How much of that came from the direction of Mike Holmgren?

If we want to criticize Ruskell for not retaining some talent (I dunno if you are; you’re simply stating fact, but others definitely do) it’s worth pointing out that Holmgren, Ferguson, Thompson & Reinfeldt presented circumstances of having a couple years with boatloads of free agent talent about to walk out the door, including one year with 16 FAs including Hasselbeck, Walter & Alexander, to re-sign. By the time those three were under contract, Hutchinson didn’t feel as valued as he wanted to be (at least that’s his public take) and managing that situation, retaining every good player was that much more difficult. Most players highly covet free agency.

They usually make orders of magnitude less before & after their free agency contract, and restricting the market to just the hometown team can make a huge difference.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

agreed, i noted as the last sentence the talent came from both Thompson and Holmgren

and the 2004-5 FA exodus was super fucked up, although I really wasn’t aware of it until a couple of weeks ago. But Allen said that was why Whitsitt was fired right?

The key is continual renewal of talent throught the draft. You build a core with cheap players through the draft, you maintain the core with reasonable contract extensions, and you only bust ass on FA when it will push you from non-playoff to playoff, or playoff to contender. I think Ruskell’s FA moves made all the difference in getting the Hawks to the Superbowl, but it certainly was not the way to build the team long term.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Nov 30, 2011 2:27 PM PST up reply actions  

What a whiny, petulant tweet.

I barely remembered he even played for the Seahawks.

by Matt Erickson on Nov 30, 2011 7:26 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Clemons is similar as a pass rusher, and superior though underrated against the run.

Babin would give us nothing we don’t already have…

"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 14, 2011 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't see what you say about Thompson after Favre left.

2008 GB was heavily penalized (I think they were still running the 4-3 then too so maybe they didn’t have the D scheme to pair with their offense adding to their woes?) but they were bristling with offensive potential. And in 2009 they made the playoffs.

I mean there was some ugly football out of that ’08 Pack, but all in all I feel it was a very brief period of worry for that team.

Can't wait for the 2011 season to kick in.

I'm a one man rec'n crew

by jubelthebear on Dec 1, 2011 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Thompson was director of pro personnel for the packer from 93-97

and director of player personnel from 97-99. The packers went to superbowls in his 3rd and 4th seasons with the team.

in 2000, Thompson became vp of operations for the seahawks and after 4 years of rebuilding the team, even though he left just before the 2005 season, the hawks were in the superbowl

in 2005, Thompson went back to the packers and in his 5th season the packers won the superbowl.

That is indisputable history. I don’t think he is hyped, I think he is respected.

I think we need to give PC and JS a similar 5 years to build a team.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Nov 30, 2011 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

You don't think "greatest talent evaluator the game has ever seen" is hyped?

Not that everyone feels that way. But I’m sure references to Ted Thompson have skyrocketed the past 2 years on non-Packer-related sports content, in the way that Manning & Brady are yardsticks for every team’s QB discussions, and every team’s draft prospect discussions (top of the draft or late gems respectively).

The history is correct but it’s misleading to attribute the results to his impact. The 90s Packers had a legendary GM who recognized the paradigm free agency was bringing earlier than others and capitalized on it with one key move, and one key trade. The coach and his system were a factor as well. That’s not on Ted. If his demonstrated proclivities are to avoid free agency for the most part (Woodson notwithstanding) then his role as director of pro wouldn’t seem to have been so instrumental since it’s established that Reggie White was Wolf’s idea and Wolf’s willingness in free agency are clear factors in their success.

The Seahawks & recent Packers success aren’t all on Ted either. Schneider was there. Holmgren was there. We can’t separate these factors. We know he’s been a factor and his success has been repeatable. Like presidents, CEOs and other GMs that often is due to the key strength of surrounding themselves with smart, talented people. It seems Thompson, like Holmgren, deserves credit in that area as well.

We know he’s good. So is Polian, Pioli, probably Rich McKay, Bruce Allen and AJ Smith, they’ve had sustained success, but not enough sustained success to demonstrate they weren’t just good GMs but great beneficiaries of favorable circumstance. Even a couple tenures that reach some kind of success, the question remains. Did AJ Smith luck into owning the 1st overall pick in the years a top prospect would yield a king’s ransom? Would Casserly & Floyd Reece & others have certain success with that kind of load as well?

Was Thompson certain that Rodgers wouldn’t turn out like David Carr? Another 1st overall prospect, Rodgers had a very similar skillset & scouting report.

They also shared what had become a dreaded stigma: being coached by Jeff Tedford:

Trent Dilfer, David Carr, Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kyle Boller. High 1st round picks who were failing in the pros like it was going out of style.

Of course that correlation is silly, and probably most GMs knew it but they were reluctant to take Rodgers. Thompson did. Did he know he wouldn’t turn out likewise? Of course not. None of them ever know. Their ability is predicated in part by knowing that it’s never a certain thing.

Good process makes a GM good. Great results are possibly never due to great ability, but rather good process & favorable circumstance.

If he’s merely respected, then good, he should be. If people think he’s the best, I just don’t know how we figure out who’s the best. Maybe there’s three or four handfuls of guys who are all about equal, and can be called the best.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

as i read this i was thinking couterpoints, but then i read your last sentence and agree 100%

in fact “best” is kind of a stupid designation for something as amorphous as this, but it is enough to say that he has a damn good track record and probably 28 out of 32 teams would love to have Thompson helping their team build a roster and find talent throught the draft and FA.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Nov 30, 2011 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow.

I forgot David Carr was a Tedford guy; for some reason I was thinking he was David Klingler. I guess because he went to Houston, and Carr played for the Houston Texans.

Anyway, Tedford’s had some good college QB’s.

Dilfer, Carr, Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers, as well as Billy Volek and A.J. Feeley.

I look at those guys and I still wonder if Tedford has anything to do with their lack of NFL success; only Rodgers went to “an ideal situation” and most went into bad situations. I wonder if anyone has done any research on this, breaking down where fault lies…

"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 14, 2011 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Trufant

As much as I love Marcus Trufant and was ecstatic when he became a ’Hawk (former Washington State product and all), I can never forget that Terrell Suggs was picked one pick ahead – and I wanted to see him in Seattle blues… so… badly.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 10:01 AM PST reply actions  

The two were my top desires that year, and I was so happy when it became clear we'd get one or the other.

I am betting we would have taken Suggs instead had we the choice. I wanted him just a smidge more. I dunno that he would have performed as well in the role we’d likely have given him, a 4-3 DE.

But I was not disappointed to get Trufant instead, and though I’d have always rather had Suggs, Trufant’s been a very satisfying pick. I had higher hopes for him than how his career turned out, but I haven’t had higher expectations than how his career turned out. Good pick and great to get a local chap.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 10:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Now that a couple of days, a bender, and a hot shower have washed the stink of Sunday's game off...

…(sort of) I’m still pleased overall with the assemblage of young talent, and moreso, the assemblage of what I would call compatible talent.

Looking at our defense, now and going forward, it is coalescing into a crew of violent barbarians – and I say this with relish, respect, and more than a little drool dribbling down my chin. Using Browner and his Sunday performance as what I feel is probably that most polarizing and iconic example of the youth and violence of these young ’Hawklings, he had three penalties and gave up a soul-raping touchdown, but he also had an interception that was a result of the same style of play that took a 7-0 game that was quickly getting away from the ’Hawks and balanced it 7-7.

Chancellor, too, with his Mac-truck collision with Hula-Hula (or whatever the F that dude’s name is) that failed to bring him down was the same style of play that leveled Santana Moss at the beginning of the game and has Bam’s rep growing as a defender receivers need to locate and avoid. (No one criticizes him for failing to wrap when he lays people out, myself included.)

On the offensive side of things, this same style of play is epitomized in Marshawn Lynch and his Beastliness, and though someone like Mike Williams has failed to produce the chunks of receiving yards that we would all like to see, I will credit him for blocking down field, something that shows me that a) he is trying, and b) something that indicates, once again, a style of physical play that permeates every level of this football team. Say what you will about Hines Ward, I’ve always loved that he was a football player first (got his start as a special teamer) and a dainty wide receiver second; the dude’s like a roving fullback.

Not wanting to start of stupid fight but simply state a theory, I have long suspected that ‘Hawks fans, with all their railing against the Steelers over the years – beyond the Penalty Bowl – have harbored a secret, begrudging envy that could match Lynch’s neon green shoes. Whether or not that’s true, this Hawk’s team is looking as though cast from an early mold of the Ravens or Steelers – and built in the same order.

I sincerely believe that the Seahawks are an above average QB away from being a major threat (the continued cultivation of the the roster notwithstanding), and bear in mind that for all the criticism against Joe Flacco, he’s consistency been above average statistically and it’s taken a 12-4 Super Bowl Champion Steelers team, a 14-2 AFC Champion Colts team, and a 12-4 AFC Champion Steelers team to punch the Ravens out of the playoffs since he took the helm (They also have to share a division with the Steelers too, of course).

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 10:46 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think Flacco has not been consistent, and has more often been below average

but I see your point and agree with you. And it only exemplifies how this approach indeed doesn’t require the fortune of uncovering Brady or Rodgers or Lucking into the 1st overall pick in the right year as a requisite component.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not in the "must draft a number one overall QB" camp. =)

And that was part of my point. In a round about way, I was supporting the post, which to me was that there’s a method to what’s happened here in Seattle and what’s happened is an event planned by our front office.

Where Flacco comes into it – and Pittsburgh – is that those are the two teams that the ‘Hawks look as though they are trying to emulate, and I support this. They both had teams – defenses specifically – built first and then went about searching for their QBs. Even as the Ravens cycled through several, they were often winning. I might have jumped the gun with regards to people’s resistance to the value of Flacco, wanting to point out that the Ravens (and his) fortunes might have looked very differently without the Steelers as their bunk-mate. It’s hard to argue that over the last four seasons the Ravens and Steelers have been two of the NFL’s four or five best teams.

With regards to Flacco being inconsistent and below average, there simply is no statistic to back that up. His ANY/A has been at or above league average in each of his four years – even this, his worst, year in which his DYAR still has him posting up as the 11th-best QB in the NFL. He’s also 4-3 as a starter in the playoffs, had a game-winning drive against the Titans in 2008, 40 wins in <4 seasons, and has only been punched out by elite competition; not everyone can win the Super Bowl every year.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I think I understood that & agreed with you.

Except about Flacco of course. And also in a roundabout way supporting the article, not to the extent that doing things the Ted Thompson way is the right way, or that he’s the best or model personnel guy. But exploring the success and what it means for us. Yeah I think we’re emulating the Ravens & Steelers, too.

Flacco: the Ravens as a team have built an effective, if not prolific passing attack. The ST, defense, running game and the other passing components contribute to that. Lower-percentage, lower-success passing balanced out with aggressive, frequent deep attempts yield enough explosive plays to make him about average. YPA is on the low side while YPT on the higher side. DYAR is a cumulative stat; DVOA he’s been best 15% above their baseline. That many standard deviations above the baseline is good, but it amounts to 15th best in the league. That’s been his best performance.

We haven’t had QBing like that since 2007. And even then it was higher percentage, equal success, mostly intermediate depth passing. In absence of any real running game I would add, but I’m not dogging Flacco. Just making a clarifying point that Flacco is not consistently above average, he amounts to average overall but the effectiveness of his game, play to play or drive to drive, is markedly inconsistent. I would still be happy to have Flacco or a QB like him for a team like this.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 1:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

But I also really like their back-up: Rookie Tyrod Taylor (Va. Tech).

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Not really sure where Joe Flacco comes into this

but I do agree that he is a capable QB. I also agree with your other points, the Seahawks are a very competitive football team right now. With the right QB they could be one of the better teams in the NFL. Letting Matt Hasselbeck (stemming from the Flacco tangent) go is probably the strangest decision this Seahawks regime has made. He was not the long term answer at QB by any means but he could have served the stop gap role more effectively than T-Jack has. Not to mention that I would much rather have Hasselbeck mentoring the new QB even if he had to do it within a body cast. I like T-Jack but I do not think he is someone you want mentoring your new QB.

With these WRs and TEs, I think Hasselbeck could have still been very productive here in Seattle. Hasselbeck does not take sacks like T-Jack, he is always trying to get rid of the football. Hasselbeck also never had a receiver corp with so much potential like the one Seattle has now. That is one thing that concerns me about Pete Carroll and the Seahawk front office, they ran away from being potentially competitive because they wanted youth. Could be a reverse repeat of Mike Holmgren and his preference for veteran players only with inexperienced youth in place of veteran savvy.

The other thing that concerns me about the Seahawk FO is that they were very high on Blaine Gabbert. Right now it is looking like they dodged a bullet by not being able to draft him. I cannot predict how Gabbert would have held up out here in Seattle though. The most likely scenario is that Hasselbeck would have stayed (and been paid) to mentor the new QB. Gabbert got the short end of the stick by being thrust into a starting role out in Jacksonville. If Gabbert gets cut from the Jaguars in the offseason, do not be surprised if the Seahawks get him to compete with their drafted QB.

Side note: Does anyone else think Matt Barkley looks like Hasselbeck with hair or am I nuts?

by Doomcarver on Nov 30, 2011 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel your Hasselbeck pain...

…especially in light of his Titanic success (see what I did there?).

However, I think given the information available (recent performance, injury history, age, money), the ‘Hawks had to cut bait. The only thing that would have unquantifiably justified their decision would’ve been a Hasselbeck crash and burn, and I’m glad that didn’t happen, nor did I think it was necessarily certain.

It’s never easy to let go of the past.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 30, 2011 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Right. Sticking with Hasselbeck was something of a bondage.

I hate to describe it that way, but he needed a team built in a different way to succeed. He’s bounced back decently for Tennessee which I’m happy for. I kinda expected it. They weren’t going to continue to build that way and it was counter-productive to moving forward. He can play better in another situation as a stopgap than the new stopgap we bring in, and it still wouldn’t mean that that wouldn’t have impeded progress, or even that the same success would have been found here for the one year.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Nov 30, 2011 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Have you watched Gabbert at all this season?

I can’t imagine the FO bringing in a guy who can’t throw the ball. Yeah they want a mobile game manager, but Tebow throws better than Gabbert.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Nov 30, 2011 2:22 PM PST up reply actions  

If the Seahawks went with T-Jack this year,

what makes you think they would not try out Gabbert? I didn’t say they would bring him in to be the starter but I would not be surprised if they brought him in to compete for the starting QB job alongside the 2012 drafted QB. The Seahawks had Gabbert rated very highly on their 2011 draft board according to other sources. That said though, I doubt that Jacksonville will give up on Gabbert after his rookie season and I should have included that in my comment. Even Peyton Manning had a rough rookie season before he learned how to carry his team.

by Doomcarver on Nov 30, 2011 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

He was rated as a first rounder by just about everyone

He is having a rough time on a bad team with a bad coach. Thats not the time to give up on a guy.

they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!

by stufr on Nov 30, 2011 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

"Hasselbeck does not take sacks like T-Jack" ???

I can’t even fathom this statement.

"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 14, 2011 2:01 PM PST up reply actions  

"coalescing into a crew of violent barbarians"

That has to be one of the best written analogies of the Seahawks defense I have read yet.

The beatings will continue until morale improves!

by HopScotch on Dec 1, 2011 12:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Go Get The Donuts Ted!

Live work and breathe like an optimist.

by JRock419 on Nov 30, 2011 11:33 AM PST reply actions  

I hate to be bitchy with grammar but "would have took" in a front-page article-- yikes.

Good read though. I enjoyed it.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 13, 2011 11:47 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies