Seattle Seahawks Run Defense and Linebacker Play
If I say "that was not a good game for our run defense", will I get an award for understatement of the season? Prior to this game, the Seahawks run D was holding runners to 3.1 YPC and hadn't allowed a single 100-yard game, this game we allowed 5.6 YPC in total and 139 yards at 6.3 YPC to Demarco Murray. We have faced some good rushing offenses, like the San Francisco 49ers and Pittsburgh Steelers. But we have also faced a lot of teams playing their backups due to injuries or suspension. Cardinals had to roll with Alfonso Smith, Cleveland with Montario Hardesty, Cincinnati with Bernard Scott. Even the Cowboys were technically running with their backup RB, though I can one would assume he'll promoted to starter now. So, that helps. It also helps that we faced some slow plodding backs that depend on their push and power, which doesn't face up well to our huge defensive line, such as Michael Turner and Frank Gore. I'm not saying I suddenly think our run defense is bad, I'm saying the stats might have painted a rosy picture.
Demarco Murray is possibly the best runner we face this season. He's not better as an all-around back than Ray Rice, obviously, and I may be going overboard with my praise, but I was seriously impressed by his vision, patience and speed out of his cuts. I have little doubt this is a star in the making. But what worried me about him was his freedom once he got into the second level. A lot of that was some really well-designed pull blocking and an all-pro-type day by fullback Tony Fiammetta, who isn't a powerful bruiser but a very intelligent blocker that picks the right block in the right direction to spring Murray nine out of ten times. But that doesn't explain everything.
Corner play is a huge concern for this defense, probably the biggest. The lack of tight coverage allowed the Cowboys to run a lot of quick passes which negated any pass rush we created, and the pass rush wasn't great anyway. The use of the quick pass scared our DC away from calling too many blitzes, which is probably the right call because we were getting gashed on screens and passes into the flats all game long. Tony Romo averaged 9 yards per pass, joining Eli Manning and Ben Roethlisberger in the "anyone who doesn't dink and dunk can eat up this defense" group.
But I'd like to highlight one concern that has been crying out for attention: our linebacker play. Linebackers aren't too important in this defensive system, but they gained importance compared to last year, and need to be able to cover the flats. I have been impressed by Leroy Hill, who is our most versatile linebacker, and is used to rush the passer, covers the flats well, can cover in man and tackles well. Hawthorne has impressed me less, and I think he's struggling to get off blocks, he's seriously regressed since his outstanding game against the Browns, but he's still doing well playing contain against the run. My most serious concern is K.J. Wright. He's not making me miss Aaron Curry yet, but neither is he a clearly better player than Curry. He bites on hard on fakes, engages blockers directly and is taken out of plays fast, and can look confused about his assignment.
This last part was on display on the Witten TD in the third quarter. Kam Chancellor signals he is in man on TE/FB John Phillips running a go route, and does well there. Witten runs right between Hawthorne and Wright, and Wright even has a hand on him, but for some mind-boggling reason neither one runs back with him. We don't know the assignment so blame either one there. Phillips gets enough of Chancellor and Thomas is too far out to make this catch at the 12 an easy touchdown. I have too many notes on this game already, so I'll stick to the first half and offer some play-by-play thoughts.
One thing that is less than ideal for us is the fact that the same linebackers stay in for multi-DB packages, where last year we'd tend to switch them out with a pass defending specialist in Will Herring, but we lost both Herring and Matt McCoy. Hawthorne stays in on pretty much all packages (though not every snap) right up to the 3-1-7 Bandit formation. He's occasionally replaced by Wright in nickel packages, with Hill the other linebacker in that formation. Our lack of depth and versatility is not helping this situation.
3-11-DAL 19 (13:42) (Shotgun) T.Romo pass short right to D.Murray to DAL 28 for 9 yards (D.Hawthorne, R.Sherman). Screen pass.
16 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very nice.
I wonder if anyone in the Seahawks organization (players, coaches) take anything away from this kind of analysis. Sure, they do their own, but I would take just moments to peruse something like this and either decide it contains nothing new, or perhaps on occasion offers an insight they missed.
About the 2011 Seahawks: "And if I laugh at any mortal thing, tis that I may not weep." Byron
No way
They have all the angles and know all the assignments. I’m often guessing on what someone’s assignment is or even what our formation is supposed to do, or what they read on the offense. Half of outside analysis, if not more, is pure guesswork, while they know. I guess you can glance at analysis for fresh input, I know some FO people like Football Outsiders for example, but truth is that even if football writers had the level of knowledge and skill of FO people (and few do, Cosell, Mayock) they still lack the same level of inside knowledge.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Nov 7, 2011 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 5 recs
I'm not sure why
but I find myself seeing just how lost Wright looks out there
much more than I ever noticed how lost Curry was
I’m not defending Curry or ripping Wright, I’m just confused why all of a sudden now I notice this stuff
Curry was lost often.
I imagine that the coaching staff here limited his role to an extent that when he messed up his impact was minimal.
Oakland on the other hand has put him in a full responsibility role where he can ruin a game. Every time I flipped over yesterday to the Raider Bronco game there he was running around lost and giving up huge plays that really cost them in ways I never saw while he was here.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
Really nice work, Beekers
The one thing I was frustrated about was that we often had a player in position to tackle Murray, but they never seemed to be able to wrap up. He’d get to the 2nd level and bounce off a LB or two pretty regularly. I know open-field tackling is a lot harder than it looks, but this seems like the reason why Murray was able to rack up the huge YPC.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Nov 7, 2011 10:19 AM PST reply actions
Totally agree, great work.
The play that sticks out in my mind was that blown tackle by Wright out in the left flat. I believe it was in Dallas’ backfield near their own 10 yard line and would’ve resulted in a huge loss, but because of the miss by Wright it turned into a positive gain.
It would be interesting to see the rushing numbers broken out into YPC before and after contact for this game. I haven’t seen tackling this bad by Seattle since Chris Ivory ran all over us in New Orleans last year.
You mean the "1-19-DAL 9 (9:24) T.Romo pass short left to D.Murray to DAL 26 for 17 yards (E.Thomas). Pass complete in the flat."
Yeah that was horribad. I actually said “oh wow” out loud when reviewing it this morning. It’s not good.
PFF tracks starts for YPC after contact, I guess I could ask.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Nov 7, 2011 10:43 AM PST up reply actions
That's the one.
If the YPC after contact stats are readily available I would be interested in seeing them. Those stats don’t cover for the bad positioning or missed assignments obviously, but they would tell some of the story.
You pulled the words right out of my mouth.
My dog was confused as to why I was screaming so much when there wasn’t anyone else in the room.
“Why can’t you make a tackle asshole!?!?!”
“I can’t make tackles! I’m a fucking quadruped and my joints bend the wrong way!”
by Chooch82 on Nov 7, 2011 3:12 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Wait, so if you're screaming at other people your dog is like "ok, business as usual"?
I worry about you, Chooch.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Nov 8, 2011 2:37 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Interesting the number of times you said that Wright was "perfectly positioned" but whiffed on the tackle
Could be a rookie thing. Fundamentally, he knows where he’s supposed to be and when he’s supposed to be there, but nerves or inexperience or what-have-you make him end up missing. Or he could Curry 2.0.
His play-reading is probably already better than Curry's even if he still bites on fakes hard at times
But he’s lacking in execution. Might be an experience thing. Might be he needs to add some bulk as some have suggested, he does look a bit lanky.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Nov 8, 2011 2:36 AM PST up reply actions

by 








































