Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Consider this a pseudo-open thread for the Penn St. scandal. There's "lack of institutional control" that involves free cars and fudged SAT scores, and then there's "lack of institutional control" that involves motherfucking child molestation. I have no words. Just sickening.

Rec this fanshot up to keep the thread alive.

7 months ago Avatar_tiny Benne 96 comments 7 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Terrible

After reading the Grand Jury report I think this was necessary. I wish I wouldn’t have read it to be honest because there is some stuff you can’t unread. It’s disturbing.

I can’t believe how many had a chance to turn the guy in and didn’t.

by bigtrain21 on Nov 9, 2011 9:06 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Holy shit

Yeah, reading that report was incredibly painful.

by MT Olson on Nov 9, 2011 9:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Im bout

To read it. .. Ima a little nervous actual

by Bruto56 on Nov 9, 2011 9:27 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

....

That was sone of the most fucked up shit i have ever read in my life. Its like something out os a sick and twisyed book. Sandusky is going to get ripped to shreads in prison

by Bruto56 on Nov 9, 2011 10:58 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah definitely not reading it after what you just said.

Eternally looking forward to someone making a Seahawks song based off of Lil' Jon's "Shots" song named "Hawks!"

by Bobby Cink on Nov 9, 2011 11:01 PM PST up reply actions  

For anyone that is not familiar with the details.

I would just read this instead. It gives you the basics of the Grand Jury report without going into the detail.

http://m.npr.org/news/front/1059?singlePage=true

by bigtrain21 on Nov 9, 2011 9:38 PM PST reply actions  

Paterno is the dog and pony show

No one is really sure what he actually knew and he got it second hand, not that he shouldn’t be fired and ridden out of town on the back of an oxcart.

McQueary is the one who should be getting killed in the media. Really you see an on an old man fucking a 10 year old in the shower and you don’t put the first heavy object you can find into his fucking skull? And every time you see him after that you don’t try and put your thumbs into his eye sockets?

Fuck the administrators too they bear more responsibility than Paterno as well, hope they get some quality time in a PMITA time.

GET OFF ME!

by flyinmonky on Nov 9, 2011 9:54 PM PST reply actions  

He told the athletic director

And the head of the school police department was also notified. Neither one of them did a thing.

What Paterno did afterwards is strictly a moral argument. And given that he never saw any wrongdoing he is well within his rights to at least report it without risking being a part of a false accusation.

So the media basically did character assassination and no one even remembers what this whole thing was about. You’d have thought Paterno was out there raping these kids. Sandusky, Curley, and Schultz are the real criminals.

McQueary should be up there, too. Any witness who stood by and did nothing are the people they should be attacking. They picked the easy icon of the school instead.

I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.

by SSreporters on Nov 9, 2011 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

This is not character assassination

This is not about the media. This is, “Hey, Joe Paterno knew about child molestation and all he did was report it up the chain of command and pretend it didn’t happen after that, and he still has a position of great power.” He didn’t follow up on it at all. These are things that happened. Not character assassination. A great many people, without the help of the media, don’t believe telling your AD about it and then ignoring it forever is acceptable.

What he did was not okay, by any standard. Cloud the situation with worry about how the media covers it and I think the point is missed.

by Gihyou on Nov 9, 2011 10:51 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Also, as head coach Paterno is responsible for the welfare of the program.

Allowing a man who he knew to be a child molester to continue to remain involved in his program left PSU open to this kind of scandal. The high school coach who reported the issue to the police and got Sandusky banned from the school district is a perfect example of how someone working with the best interest of his school and it’s students would handle the situation. This doesn’t even have to enter into an argument about Paterno’s moral responsibilities, he completely failed to protect the university from the enormous embarrassment Sandusky has caused them.

by Nate Dogg on Nov 10, 2011 12:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Once nothing was done about it

Paterno should have done more. He seemed to be more than happy apparently to have it swept under the rug. I believe everyone who knew about it should be fired.

McQueary
Paterno
Curley
Shultz
Spanier
Anyone else I am forgetting.

Most of those have been taken care of. It is inexcusable for them all to sit on this information. Yes the information was 2nd hand for all of them but McQueary, but they still could have notified the authorities to look into the matter further.

The media had nothing to do with my decision either. Once I read the Grand Jury report and found out that Paterno knew on some level that’s where my decision was made. I am generally a wait for all the facts to come in kind of guy too. In this case we have quite a few facts based on the testimony under oath.

by bigtrain21 on Nov 9, 2011 10:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Paterno told the AD, yes

But so what? Do you really think that the AD was a more powerful, influential presence at Penn than Paterno? And if you do, pass me some of whatever you’re smoking. Paterno was The Man at that school, and could well have inflicted his will upon the situation.

And, apparently, he did, but not in the fashion that we all wish he would have. Instead, he let the matter go, and innocents paid the price. Sandusky’s going to prison, that’s almost a certainty. But Paterno is fair game for the media, especially as a nice, cozy prison cell won’t be waiting for him.

by Buster! on Nov 10, 2011 1:56 AM PST up reply actions  

This

especially " Really you see an on an old man fucking a 10 year old in the shower and you don’t put the first heavy object you can find into his fucking skull? " that part.

by alexander_37 on Nov 9, 2011 10:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I think your silent protest

is a slap on the face to victims of sex crimes nothing more or less. Children are more important than football dude. wrong time and place for this.

by Rundstrom on Nov 9, 2011 10:43 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I interpreted this as his being upset at the lack of any action being taken by the folks at Penn State.

Cause the Nittany Lion is blindfolded and turning a blind eye to the horrific events. I saw this as his standing up for the victims of sex crimes.

Eternally looking forward to someone making a Seahawks song based off of Lil' Jon's "Shots" song named "Hawks!"

by Bobby Cink on Nov 9, 2011 10:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Jerry Sandusky

    From Penn State to the State Pen, and rightfully so.
From the Second Mile to the Green Mile, from Happy Valley to giving his inmate Brethren happy endings.

Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf

by dbcouver on Nov 9, 2011 10:46 PM PST reply actions  

Wow, yeah crazy...

overturned satellite truck and light posts torn down.

Eternally looking forward to someone making a Seahawks song based off of Lil' Jon's "Shots" song named "Hawks!"

by Bobby Cink on Nov 9, 2011 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

WTF???

Those sad, pathetic little fucks are actually defending Paterno? That is just plain sick and sad.

by Buster! on Nov 10, 2011 2:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Those students are just angry in general.

It might look like it’s about Paterno but I imagine they all feel a bit violated. You work real hard and pay a lot of money to go to that school with it’s reputation, and all of a sudden everything comes crashing down. I’d imagine that’s where the rioting is coming from. Everybody who these students looked up to and learned from failed not only those boys but everyone at that school and in that community.
Disaster has struck and I’m sure many aren’t capable of believing what happened at this time. Angry kids can do some pretty stupid shit.

by brugg on Nov 10, 2011 7:04 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

agreed

cognitive dissonance is a mother fucker

GET OFF ME!

by flyinmonky on Nov 10, 2011 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

I cannot fathom

How noone did shit in this matter. Its outright sickening.

by Bruto56 on Nov 9, 2011 11:01 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Did anyone see Sandusky's book?

It’s called " Touched : The Jerry Sandusky Story " what a dick bag.

Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. - Al Swearengen

by Lo Pann on Nov 9, 2011 11:15 PM PST reply actions  

This whole thing reeks of "Lack Of Institutional Control."

They weren’t covering up a local store giving athletes free shoes. They weren’t covering up donors paying the rent for the star QB. They weren’t covering up an assistant coach’s DWI; hell, they weren’t even covering up Jerramy Stevens date-raping a sorority chick. This is fucking CHILD RAPE, occurring multiple times over the course of 15 or more years, with multiple people we are almost positive are in the know, and who knows how many others could have known without being identified (yet).

How can an organization let sins of this magnitude sit in the ether for so long, and not be completely corrupt to its very core? When is a cover-up so vile and far-reaching that its taint even covers those who had no idea what was going on, but supported a system that allowed the crimes to happen in the first place? Maybe after something like this, the entire foundation that is Penn State University needs to be broken down and rebuilt, to ensure BEYOND ANY DOUBT something even remotely like this will never happen again.

Firing Paterno, Schultz and Curley might be just like putting a band-aid on a malignant tumor.

by J.L. White on Nov 9, 2011 11:45 PM PST reply actions  

I think we're all skating over a larger issue that needs to be addressed:

Too many times sports organizations/communities collude to give free passes to athletes/coaches in spite of criminal behavior. Rape is a biggie.

Penn State just got caught red-handed. It’s frightening how much else is being swept under the rug (UW basketball, anyone?).

by Groundhog on Nov 10, 2011 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

That's exactly right; college programs are so adept at going into "coverup" mode that they can't tell the difference between the small stuff and something like this.

I can understand trying to coverup a donor who is a little too charitable with the players on your football team; the NCAA has a lot of arcane rules about that kind of stuff and sometimes the line can get blurry. I’m not saying it’s the right thing to do, but I understand.

The Sandusky situation (I really don’t want to keep typing child rape, ugh) has no gray area to it, no “crime not worth the controversy” kind of argument; it’s abhorrent on every level. It’s so bad I think that EVERY college sports program might need to be redesigned, so coverups no longer become such a knee-jerk reaction.

Part of me wants Penn State to pay the highest price for this…..er, situation, just so other programs get scared straight. I can’t think of any other university (well, at least any D-1 program) that can’t look at this and say, “It could never happen here.” It can.

by J.L. White on Nov 10, 2011 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

The sad thing is that the NCAA is kind of an accomplice to the system.

And by doing nothing to Penn State…well, we’ve seen where doing nothing can get you.

by Groundhog on Nov 11, 2011 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

You know the real fucked up thing. . . .

McQueary who was the one who witnessed the shower incident happens to be the WR coach AND. . ..recruiting coordinator. So this McQueary guy is one of the guys calling and visiting all the recruits parents and letting them know that “your boy is going to be in a good upstanding group of mentors” and “he will learn how to be a good ball player and a better man”. . . you know all that bullshit. He’s saying that crap all the while knowing there is a damn child molester sodomizing boys on occasion in the locker room. I find it odd how McQueary could just kind of block that out while advising kids they should play for PSU.

by hawks02 on Nov 10, 2011 12:04 AM PST reply actions  

Unbelievable.

I finished reading the report an hour ago, I feel so heavily pervaded with disgust and disbelief and anger and there is nothing that can be done to stop it from having happened and he just stood there and then ran leaving a little 10 old alone, he should go to fucking prison and so should anyone who knew and didn’t contact the police, fuck the school, that didn’t do shit and they all knew it. That fucking deviant freak was on campus until two weeks ago. They all knew it and did nothing. People losing it over Paterno either haven’t read the report or just are fucking messed up.

best tackling team in the NFL, most physical and just dominates people. When we walk out of the tunnel and out of that locker room, we expect to shut people out and play great defense - Ravens DC Chuck Pagano

by BALT21 on Nov 10, 2011 1:39 AM PST up reply actions  

As of this morning McQueary still has a job

Paterno was just theater in the hopes that it would go away when he did.

GET OFF ME!

by flyinmonky on Nov 10, 2011 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm glad they fired the old fuck.

I thought he was going to escape untainted from this.

"You SUCK, Keary Colbert! You should be selling insurance. INSURANCE, Keary!
-Random drunk Hawks fan in Miami after watching Keary Colbert drop another wide-open pass.

It's Great To Be a Florida Gator!

by Wayward Llama on Nov 10, 2011 3:31 AM PST reply actions  

Paterno doesn't deserve to go out like this

Of course the media is going to make Paterno look like the enemy. The only reason I would completely be against Paterno is if he was the child rapist. Look at ALL the good he has done this program. Besides this name 1 other thing said bad about Paterno?

by luciuswolfey_96 on Nov 10, 2011 6:58 AM PST reply actions  

Doesn't matter.

This is pure negligence. Besides the moral reasons on a practical level how could he do his job anymore. What’s a coach without trust and authority. No parent is going to feel safe sending their child(newly adult) to that school while anyone involved in anyway resides there.

by brugg on Nov 10, 2011 7:09 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Too many people judging

JoePa made a mistake, but we still don’t know how the facts were presented to him and what he perceived. He took the issue to a “superior,” which was not enough, especially after that superior failed to act. I am with you on this one. He should have been reprimanded, but he did not deserve all that happened to him. I think that had he known and understood the extent of what was going on, more would have been done. I will never believe that he knew the full extent of the problem.

by PullManiac on Nov 10, 2011 2:33 PM PST up reply actions  

He kept himself in the dark.

It’s not good enough to say he didn’t know the full extent of it. We can’t have ignorance incentivized, not on something like this. What knowledge Paterno did have created certain duties, and he failed them hugely. Even 15 years ago maybe it’s different, but look how swiftly public opinion has gone against him. It’s a different time now, we’ve evolved past where shame is an excuse for silence. Or where anything is.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Nov 10, 2011 11:52 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

What I don't understand is why Paterno isn't one of the accused in the court case

Did the prelim uncover enough evidence that he really truly did not know enough? I don’t understand how he is not accessory to the fact

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Nov 10, 2011 8:16 AM PST reply actions  

That's why I'm not bothered by Paterno getting fired.

He’s lucky that he was just outside of the loop enough to avoid being charged with anything…..yet. Losing his job (when he’s 84 and already contemplating retirement) is a walk in the park compared to that.

by J.L. White on Nov 10, 2011 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I completely agree.

I started to write more about the hypocrisy, but I think you covered it pretty well. If the NCAA house of cards wasn’t’ already in trouble it will be if they don’t act on this.

by brugg on Nov 10, 2011 9:07 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I believe that they cannot because the accusations are outside of their jurisdictions

I thought about that. Honestly this is death-penalty worthy but then you have to figure they will lose a ton of scholarships, people will start bailing out immediately, and the school itself will no longer be an appealing choice to play football or attend school period.

They’ll get an indirect hit out of this.

I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.

by SSreporters on Nov 10, 2011 9:24 AM PST up reply actions  

The NCAA has always made up its jurisdiction anyway.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Nov 10, 2011 10:50 AM PST up reply actions  

I would like you to explain

How this is outside of their Jurisdictions? The NCAA has the power to do anything it wants to a member or institution within it, at least this has been their MO. Penn State can appeal through legal action. In my Opinion the NCAA should drop the Hammer and hard.

by Jazzercise! on Nov 10, 2011 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

There's no jurisdiction issue.

If the NCAA can cite schools for breaking rules that they made up they certainly can cite schools for breaking the rule of law. And the Miami scandal back in the day where federal laws were broken/fraud is precedent.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Nov 10, 2011 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

The big thorn is that NCAA doesn't intervene into criminal affairs

They leave that up to the authorities. Everybody’s already made the joke about "hurr, they punished USC for free houses, but not Penn St. for child rape, hurr", but at that point, it’s not really in their hands.

Now, apparently one of the victims was promised a walk-on spot for keeping his mouth shut, so if NCAA wanted to get involved, they might construe that as a recruiting violation. But probably not.

Really, this whole thing is just a sad microcosm of the broken college football system. Ever look at the latest violation and wonder, "how much lower can they sink to keep the gravy train rolling"? Well, we now have our answer.

by Benne on Nov 10, 2011 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Hmmm...so McQueary will be on the sidelines coaching this weekend

Oh yeah, this makes complete sense.

I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.

by SSreporters on Nov 10, 2011 9:27 AM PST reply actions  

Yeah I don't get this part either.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Nov 10, 2011 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Haven't paid any attention to this, because nothing shuts my brain down faster than the words "Penn State" or "Joe Paterno"

So thanks for posting. I thought this was a “AD sends creepy emails to interns” scandal, not…whatever you call what this monster was doing. There’s no punishment too harsh.

by jhmg16 on Nov 10, 2011 11:01 AM PST reply actions  

PS made the right decision.

As a university you have to clean house in a situation like this. How many coaches have we seen ousted for turning a blind eye toward booster activities? To think Paterno could stay after something like this is ridiculous. Is he “less guilty”? Maybe, but if you even have the slightest idea something like this is going on, you tell the AD AND the authorities. Sorry but Joe had to go.

by Ventiller on Nov 10, 2011 12:52 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Here's the thing about McQueary

His position is nested within the “coaching umbrella”, AKA the umbrella Paterno once had control over. So nobody really had the power or the time to fire him yet. Apparently he’s not being allowed on the field Saturday, but none of that is relevant to my second point.

He’s the star witness in the upcoming trial. He witnessed the ’02 rape, and his actions afterwards started the chain reaction of incompetence and kicking the problem upstairs. His testimony is the biggest key towards getting Sandusky a conviction—remember, the janitor who witnessed the ’00 assault is now demented and unfit to testify. So the prosecution needs McQueary. You could argue that keeping him employed is immoral or whatever (they could always hide him in a basement until they need his testimony).

McQueary made some serious mistakes, but we still need him on our side if we want to see Sandusky and Co. brought to justice.

by Benne on Nov 10, 2011 10:11 PM PST reply actions  

Also, as a friendly mod note, please rec this fanshot up.

This has been a good thread so far, and I want to keep the discussion going. I know this is a dark, emotionally charged topic, but we’ve been pretty civil so far, and I want to keep that up. Good job.

by Benne on Nov 10, 2011 10:16 PM PST reply actions  

Joe Paterno and the Penn State Fiasco (apologies for the length)

I don’t have a problem with Joe Paterno being fired at some point per se, but I do have a problem with him being fired at this time.

I’ll start with the most unpopular point of view I possess. I know that we’ve become a culture of over-reactive Uruk-hai, driven by the whips of our media masters, but legally, Jerry Sandusky is innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his peers, has the right to confront his accusers, and as a citizen of the United States is owed due process.

Is Sandusky guilty? I don’t know; I wasn’t there. Do I think he’s guilty? Yes, I do, but my opinion – and your opinion – is not due process. To convict yet another person in the court of public opinion before they’ve had their day in court, before the prosecution has to publicly present a single shred of evidence is fucking bullshit, I don’t care how often we do it. Furthermore, was the Duke Lacrosse scandal so long ago that we’ve all forgotten the reason for these laws?

Whenever there’s a scandal of this nature people are quick to distance themselves from such activities as loudly and profusely as possible. Rhetoric such as the assistant coach who saw the act in 2002 should have killed Sandusky right then and there gets spewed. What would I have done were I the assistant coach who witnessed it? If I were Joe Paterno? I don’t know; I’ve never been in their shoes.

I do know that I would want as little to do with it as possible, and given Sandusky’s reputation and status with Penn State, I think it’s fair to assume that the assistant coach – a graduate student at the time – was probably worried about losing his job even for reporting it and the potential impact of his career. That doesn’t mean that he shouldn’t have reported it to the authorities, but I’ve lost jobs standing up for what’s right, and let me tell you something, you can’t pay rent or feed your kids with ethics.

At the very least his coaching career would probably have been over if only for the above reason – a desire to forget, to distance oneself. It ain’t fair, but if you deny that’s what would likely have happened, you’re smoking some good shit.

Furthermore – and I only ask this as a question – I wonder if the outrage at Sandusky and the associated parties would’ve been as great, the desire to distance themselves from it as great, if he’d been buggering girls. Sure, people would’ve still been outraged, but I’m wondering if the hushed tones and cover-up would’ve been as prominent if the sex in this case was not homosexual in nature. Just something to think about.

Now the assistant coach says he saw Sandusky and the boy in the shower. He told Paterno. Sandusky was not on Paterno’s staff at that time, thus Paterno had no direct authority over him. Also, what the assistant coach saw and what he told Paterno is still being sifted through by the justice department and ultimately only those two will ever know. Paterno witnessed nothing, and claims that the assistant coach said something happened using the words ‘inappropriate’ and ‘horseplay’. This is a point of contention for many people. Regardless, Paterno reported the event to Penn State’s athetic director.

Now, Paterno’s been coaching Penn State football for 61 years. I’m 37 years old, and he’s been coaching there for 61 years, during which time he’s run a clean and successful program. Graduation rates vary based on the sources I was checking, but they’ve always been very high for college sports or otherwise. This means that Paterno ran his program the way it’s supposed to run, for the benefit of the student-athletes first, and his own ego and the boosters second and a distant third. This means that he coached at a deficit for the majority of those 61 years. This means that he lost games because he wouldn’t cheat – he put the needs of his players as young men, his program’s integrity, and his ethics above winning and his own selfish desires for 61 years.

I do not believe that Paterno should get a pass because he won two national championships or won 400+ games. I don’t believe he should get a pass at all. If it was determined that he knowingly tucked this business with Sandusky under the rug, then he should be fired. But if it’s a question of his character – a question of whether or not he deserves the benefit of the doubt – he’s earned that benefit with 61 years of service, don’t you think?

To not take him at his word when his 61 years of service stand as a testament to his character to put the interests of the young men under his aegis above his own is pure hogshit. Just because the rest of the world is corrupt and jaded doesn’t mean that he is. He spent 61 years proving it.

And you know something? I don’t think anyone cares. His termination, coming now, isn’t about punishment. He’s not being fired for something he did wrong, because no one could possibly know what that is yet, and more to the point, it hasn’t been proven in a court of law that Sandusky’s even guilty yet. He’s being punished so that the University can make it go away. They desire to travel the shortest distanct between two points, and if they fire every single person associated with this mess, they can distance themselves from kiddy-rapers and those who might have know that a guy once claimed he saw something inappropriate.

Now if that bold faced portion sounds familiar, it’s because it’s the exact same fucking thing that got Penn State into this pickle in the first place. These events weren’t investigated properly over the last ten years because Penn State wanted it to go away, and Paterno is being fired now because they want it to go away. That’s not justice, it’s our bullshit culture flexing its bullshit muscles to nail someone to a cross to prove we care about something after the fact – and the best looking accessory to our crucifix is the most famous name in the pile – Joe Paterno.

Holy shit and hallelujah; gimme some Tylenol.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 14, 2011 12:35 PM PST reply actions   3 recs

There's no due process violation.

Also, this case was not “homosexual in nature”.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Nov 14, 2011 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, Sandusky has already been convicted in the court of public opinion

And I include myself in that, without the benefit of any trial or even evidence; like most, I assume that there is little reason to bring forth such charges unless one were telling the truth and that the number of listed offenses suggests a glut of evidence and/or testimony. At this time that’s all it is – assumption and conjecture. It’s not the trial, but it might as well be. It’s also public opnion so there’s nothing to be doen about it, but that doesn’t make it right.

In the way that a man raping a women would be hetero, the sex in this case would be defined as homo or same sex. To insist these labels not be used makes the process of communication needlessly more complicated than it already is. And it SHOULD make no difference. I ASKED A QUESTION as to whether or not there might be a subconcious difference in perception due the nature of the same sex dynamic between the alleged assailant and victim(s).

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 14, 2011 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

If my son was sexually assaulted, I'd be pushing for prison for life.

If it was my daughter, I’d be trying to run him over with my truck.

by MT Olson on Nov 14, 2011 6:30 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Uhhhm, really?

That’s just retarded. Son or daughter, I’d be trying to run him over with my truck, car, and/or bulldozer.

by B.B.Finnegan on Nov 15, 2011 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I was actually exaggerating some to make point, murder would not be a healthy reaction.

Your response is a little disconcerting especially given the lack of a conviction.

My point was that many men are more protective of the women in their lives and therefore far more irrational in times like this.

by MT Olson on Nov 15, 2011 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

You wouldn't need a conviction, if you were the parent and you knew your child

Men being more protective of women is a guess. As partners, perhaps (but why wouldn’t a gay man or woman be just as protective?), but we’re discussing children here, not partners. Maybe when they go out on a date, but sexual abuse? I don’t buy that at all. A child is a child.

by B.B.Finnegan on Nov 15, 2011 7:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Public opinion is a legitimate entity. This isn't the Natalee Holloway case.

You correctly note that “the number of listed offenses suggests a glut of evidence and/or testimony” but then in the very next breath claim that people are operating solely based on “assumption and conjecture”. No, they’re not. They are aware of the mountain of evidence you just acknowledged. Just because the American people can and do get hysterical doesn’t mean they are acting hysterically in this instance.

As for your paean to an antiseptic English, free of all historical and cultural traces, it comes across as a bit naive. But if you really, honestly, cannot see why gay men and women might (conceivably) object to the word “homosexual” being applied to pedophilia, I suggest you find one of your gay friends and ask them. Be prepared for a watery look.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Nov 14, 2011 7:24 PM PST up reply actions  

You conveniently ignore that I used hetero with regards to male to female rape...

So I suppose all heterosexuals should be equally offended? Seems like a waste of energy and a deliberate attempt to find offense where none was intended or given. It also supports one of my other points that people would seemingly rather parse over the use of a word and dodge issues rather than discuss the possibility that society as a whole is more creeped out by a man raping a boy than a man raping a girl and as such might add to the already considerable mess.

And the public is acting hysterically when they insist on nailing people to the wall before they even have a trial. It’s also more than accurate to call it assumption and conjecture when you’re in no way associated with the events and people of the case; you’ve read words on a page, none of which are ordained as fact. Just because you believe it is true doesn’t mean it’s not an assumption.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 14, 2011 10:41 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Given that you say society as a whole is "more creeped out" by a man raping a boy,

This would be a good platform to note that pedophelia and sexuality have almost no correlation. Almost all pedophiles are hetrosexual in their adult relationships, regardless of the sex of the child they’re violating.

But society as a whole doesn’t want to have to infer that heterosexuality leads to deviency, the same way they might with homosexuality.

by Groundhog on Nov 17, 2011 3:41 PM PST up reply actions  

It's also frustrating to me...

When people use a standard debate tactic to discredit an argument. In this case we can discuss the specific usage of a word while discussing the actual point goes by the wayside. It poisons any real attempt at being understood or understanding – for me any way.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Nov 14, 2011 10:56 PM PST up reply actions  

What if what I'm trying to get you to understand is how your own words can obscure your point?

That’s all I’m trying to get across. I’m not resisting your ideas. You wrote several hundred words, and there were lots of ideas, and some I agreed with and some I didn’t, but none of them provoked a strong reaction. What stuck out the most was the thing I commented on. In the context of this thread and your sincere expression, I was too blithe, and I apologize for that. I should have approached your words with more respect, but believe me, nothing you said pissed me off. When I say that public opinion is a legitimate entity, I include your opinion in that too. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

For the record, I agree with Benne above when he wrote, “If Sandusky were raping 10-year-old girls the outrage would remain the same.” I had nothing to add.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Nov 15, 2011 1:25 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I think "clean" is now up for debate.

“Now, Paterno’s been coaching Penn State football for 61 years. I’m 37 years old, and he’s been coaching there for 61 years, during which time he’s run a clean and successful program.”

Is it a clean program, or just the best at covering up?

by Groundhog on Nov 17, 2011 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Reading an article at Sports Illustrated, it implies that things aren't as squeeky clean as everyone thought.

Parts about Penn State’s past are on the second page.

Article here

How come you can do all this other great shit, but you can't lie the fuck down and sleep?

by JAH on Nov 21, 2011 12:12 AM PST up reply actions  

The fact that McQueary told Paterno what he saw in 2002 is proof he that he DESERVED to get fired.

Unless McQueary is lying — and unless you also believe Paterno had no knowledge in the 1998 investigation that nearly led to criminal charges against Sandusky (2 very big unlesses) — Paterno has been complicit in this coverup for nearly a decade now, and his silence is DEAFENING. Pedophiles prey on children that are vulnerable, so they won’t immediately report what happened to them; they are also depended on the people they know being COMPLETELY silent on even the rumors of “inappropriate actions,” so they can continue to prey without consequence. If it wasn’t for people like Paterno, who just wanted to keep this whole mess out of the public’s eye and everything staying the way things already are, then it would be a lot easier for molesters to be caught.

I’m not saying Joe Paterno is evil and deserves to go to jail, or anything….hell, I can even understand how he’d want to avoid personally being responsible for his good friend being sent to jail for (perhaps) the rest of his life, but the firing was MORE THAN JUSTIFIED, and he should be glad he (probably) won’t be punished further.

by J.L. White on Nov 17, 2011 11:13 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

you can understand why he avoid to send him to jail ??

I can’t, Paterno deserved what he got i totally agree, i still don’t understand why McQueary has a job.

by XXDC2XX on Nov 18, 2011 9:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies