Seahawks Defeat Eagles 31-14: Quick Hitters
The Seahawks bounced back from a rough outing last Sunday against the Redskins to beat the struggling Eagles tonight, 31-14. The performance was pretty solid on all fronts, offense, defense, and special teams. Marshawn Lynch was the engine that ran the Seahawks offense, rushing for 148 yards and two touchdowns on 22 carries, at 6.7 yards per carry. His 15-yard touchdown run in the first quarter was the quintessential 2nd and 3rd effort we've come to appreciate with Lynch, as he barreled into a pile, appeared to be stopped in his tracks, then miraculously emerged unscathed to run the 13 yards or so to the score.
The defense did their part as well, picking off Vince Young four times, including a 77-yard touchdown return by David Hawthorne that iced the game.
The Eagles looked discombobulated for the most part in the first half and the Seahawks took advantage, taking a 17-7 lead into the half. In the second half the Eagles made a run for it with a 17-play, 80-yard drive through the 3rd quarter and into the 4th that chewed up 10:13 and ended with a LeSean McCoy touchdown on a shovel pass, which cut the lead to ten with 12:56 to go. That was the closest it would get from there.
Here are some of my quick hit reactions:
- On offense, it was great to see the offensive line opening up big holes for Lynch and the run game and they really set the tone. The Hawks rushed for 174 frickin yards. I like that. Marshawn played like a man possessed (on skittles, maybe). He looks like a feature, franchise type running back, dangerous between the tackles, bouncing it outside, and receiving out of the backfield.
My SBN colleague Joe Goodberry, a writer for the Bengals blog Cincy Jungle and native of Buffalo, pointed out this statistic to me: (in his career), after November 1st, Marshawn Lynch has 543 carries for 2,350 yrds at 4.3 YPC. Other months, 489 for 1,694 yrds (3.46). That stat doesn't include today, so tack on 148 yards on 22 carries for 6.7 YPC. The longer Lynch plays throughout a season, the better he gets.
- Tarvaris Jackson really did have himself a hell of a game. He finished 13-16 for 190 yards and a touchdown. If that's not a 'game-manager' performance I don't know what is - with a rating of 137.0. He was also clutch, and in the first half had first-down completions of 21, 25, and 26 on third-downs. That's huge.
Jackson also spread the love - Golden Tate led the way with four receptions for 47 yards and a touchdown, Michael Robinson had four catches for 41 yards, Zach Miller two for 53, Ben Obomanu two for 28. Surprisingly, Doug Baldwin only had one catch for 21, but as Charlie pointed out pre-game, he was a third down machine, and was the recipient of that first big third down conversion pass I just mentioned above.
- Speaking of Golden Tate - I thought he had a very solid game. He broke out his nifty spin move, that I love so much, and his touchdown catch was a thing of beauty, falling out of the back of the endzone and just getting his feet in bounds. Also, should point out that it was an absolute dime by Tarvaris Jackson.
- The Seahawks had six plays of 20 or more yards. That's decent.
- The Seahawks cleaned up the penalties this game, with only 5 for 30 yards. That included only one in the 2nd half. Big improvement.
- Brandon Browner and Richard Sherman both had strong games again - Browner picking off two Vince Young passes and Richard Sherman batting down a sure touchdown pass. Love to see the development of these two players.
- I thought Leroy Hill and KJ Wright both played well, and David Hawthrone was his steady self, picking off a pass in which he looked to go "Oh sh*t here's the ball!" right before catching it.
- Hell, I thought the whole defense played pretty well, though they did give up 132 yards rushing to the Eagles on 5.3 yards per carry. 58 or so of those yards though came on that long 3rd/4th quarter drive where the Eagles really started hitting on all cylinders. Regardless, they did enough to keep the Eagles out of the endzone but twice, and make no mistake, this is a very good rushing team that came into the game 2nd in the league on the ground.
All in all, a pretty convincing win, regardless of how banged up the Eagles really are. The attitude and swagger is back, and hopefully the Seahawks can carry that into next week's MNF game against the Rams. There is a good feeling around the team right now but I'll still be looking for consistency and mental toughness.
Mike Williams still didn't get involved in the offense and it's looking like Russell Okung could be hurt with a pec injury suffered late in the 4th quarter. The severity of the injury is unknown at this point, but Pete Carroll said it "doesn't look good" right now. The defense still got gauged at points and mistakes were made. Right now though, I'll take the win and enjoy it for the next week and a half.
What do you think? Highlights? Lowlights? Hit me up.
Follow @FieldGulls on Twitter | Like Field Gulls on Facebook
263 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not surprised with that Lynch statistic.
We all know that defenses begin to wear down as the season winds down so RBs are generally going to have better games, especially a physical back like Lynch who can smash his way through a battered defense.
RBs will also wear down though
Especially a RB who gets almost all of the workload. SO it is also good to see that he can handle that huge workload
Golden Tate made the kind of plays we always knew he was capable. Well done to him
Also Trent Cole is a scumbag
Trent Cole is a scumbag
That’s funny to me. I have been waiting for Golden to break out sometime. It could be in the near future.
Yes I'm really happy for him (Golden Tate), because he seems like a decent enough guy.
That, and he’s obviously incredibly talented.
Beekers hit the nail on the head
when he mentioned that McCoy was the type of RB that tended to tear us up. We just have the hardest times with those shifty, speedy backs.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 9:22 PM PST reply actions
That's the downside to getting bigger, stronger defenders.
Don’t have the agility of the smaller RBs and receivers.
And we over-commit and sometimes we don't wrap up
but, yeah, our bigger defense tends to be a slower defense.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 9:25 PM PST up reply actions
Great game but I wish I had had a better experience at the CLink.
Had someone behind me complain that I was standing while the defense was on the field in the second quarter. Spoke to a couple ushers and was basically told that you’re only allowed to stand for big plays. One of the ushers said that the problem all started when the soccer fans started coming to the stadium, which was a surprise to hear. The whole thing was disappointing, makes me worry that they’ve changed the kind of environment they want at games.
That's such bullshit
whatever happened to jumping and screaming like an animal no matter what?
Do or do not, there is no try-Yoda
That really sucks
I’ve been to two games and stood on all the defensive plays, yelling myself hoarse and dizzy. I had really cheap tickets, though, so maybe they cater to assholes in fancier parts of the stadium.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 9:26 PM PST up reply actions
Me and my Dad have been going since 2003, club seats for since 2006.
This was the first problem we’ve had at a Hawks game but we got asked to sit down by fans at the WSU game a couple weeks ago. The ushers had asked a couple other groups in our section to sit down too, so it wasn’t just us.
Maybe it's a club-level thing.
Hopefully it’s not an official policy because that’s some straight-up bullshit.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 9:32 PM PST up reply actions
I was up in 327 and we stood up for every defensive possession
And probably 75% of offensive snaps. Honestly, if you’re gonna go to a game and get pissy about people standing up, get out. Watch the game at home.
by Matt Erickson on Dec 1, 2011 10:23 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
I think I had tickets in that same section (for one of the games at least)
Cheap but still had a great view. Yelled myself hoarse both times.
It’s not an issue that’s restricted to the NFL or the CLink, though. NBA fans in the inner bowl show up late and leave early pretty frequently.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 10:44 PM PST up reply actions
Seriously I think they're some of the best seats in the house
Great view of EVERYTHING. Only spent $30 each.
by Matt Erickson on Dec 1, 2011 10:53 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
Agreed, the cheap seats are cheap and still include a great view.
And I’ve never had a problem being told to sit down.
The one time I sat in club seats, it was the Packers game in 2008, these Packers fans behind me asked me to sit down. A short time later the Packers scored and the old man behind was yelling “Go Pack!” over and over. He’s lucky he was elderly because I wanted to smack him.
Anyways, seems like the more people pay for seats, the less they get into the game.
by Hopefulmsfan on Dec 2, 2011 1:34 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Unfortunately
Most of the prissy, not real fans, just there for a social outing types sit in the more expensive seats. I have this problem when I go to Baseball games, I have a lot more fun in the nose bleeds with those fans than with the fans at field level. That’s not true for every fan sitting in the expensive seats, but it does seem to be the consensus. I live in Texas and when I go to M’s games in Arlington it’s like that.
No
but there are more corporate owners of season tickets in cushier seats and the people that attend games on those tickets tend not to be as die-hard. These sorts of people are less common in the cheap seats.
Also, the club level often costs as much as closer seats but offers more comfort.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 2, 2011 9:39 AM PST up reply actions
No
I wasn’t saying that and even stated that NOT TRUE for every fans sitting in expensive seats. The vast majority of them are though. You see it nationwide in all venues in all sports. You have corporate, casual, social (see laker games) just wanting to be seen fans who normally can afford the “good seats”. Then you have the die hard, average everyday fans who can’t ALWAYS afford the good seats. Some of them can but themajority of the fans in the expensive seats game to game are not really good fans.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:00 AM PST up reply actions
You mean they don't mesh with what you believe a good fan is.
Those there for a social outing are entitled to the same comfort and regulations as anyone else. They, just as much as you do, get to define the atmosphere of the stadium. If they chose to sit and enjoy the game in silence or in the company of others, that’s within their right. It’s not prissy of them to ask that you respect the experience they’re paying for.
I don't like to stand at games and if I go its with my 90 year old grandma
I shouldn’t have my fan hood questioned for it
they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!
by stufr on Dec 2, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm having trouble understanding what we're talking about.
People will really tell you you’re not allowed to stand up during the game? That’s just not computing for me. It’s one thing to want or need to sit down. That would be doing your part to define the atmoshphere. But there are really sections where other people can make you sit down if you’d rather stand up while we’re on defense? If I’m sitting down, I can’t make a megaphone out of my hands and direct the noise down into their huddle.
Ah, hello my slow fat fingers say to Lord Humongous
-Kingdomer
by EthelGemerman on Dec 2, 2011 3:25 PM PST up reply actions
If you are standing in front of someone who would rather sit and you stand the whole game you are making it impossible for them to see the game
no they shouldn’t make you always sit, because that is ruining it for you, but if you want to stand the whole game I’m going to ask you to sit your ass down at times because I don’t want to and I want to be able to see.
they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!
That wasn't my situation, i wasn't standing the whole time.
But even if I had been, that doesn’t make it impossible for you to see. Whether you want to or not, you can stand up. If that’s an issue for you then going to games probably isn’t the best place for you to enjoy watching the Hawks. There are lots of places you can sit and watch a game, there’s only one place you can stand and cheer your team on.
by Nate Dogg on Dec 2, 2011 6:27 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I think it's funny that we live in a time...
Where people won’t just say it.
I will.
YES. As a general rule, ‘cheaper people’ – I assume you mean poor – care more about the actual event than ‘more expensive’ people – rich – who care more about being able to show how much they can afford to attend the event. And often when that’s not the case, rich people dwell in social conditions that do not reward fanatical displays, even if said fan is feeling.
Ask the players what they want to play in front of; thunderous, timely support, or silence and golf clapping.
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
Sounders fans have similar problems.
There are those of us who believe in standing the whole game, and then there’s those who like to say “I paid for a seat, not a spot.”
I met a possum.
by s0merand0mdude on Dec 1, 2011 9:39 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Also, quite simply, standing fans make for better TV
Just sayin’
I met a possum.
by s0merand0mdude on Dec 1, 2011 9:47 PM PST up reply actions
wait, were you in the lower bowl?
I had two people in front of me in the club section get the ushers come in for the same issue. I understand if someone sitting behind you has an issue for whatever reason and asks you to sit, but the Powers That Be were definitely trying to put out a “sit down and clap” vibe.
hah, I think I was immediately behind you to your right
what’s ridiculous is that no one in our row had an issue with people standing. the only people who could have complained must have had some ridiculous offset view.
I think an overzealous usher might have had us confused with the group 10 rows ahead of us.
Everyone in the row around us were really supportive and encouraged us to stand, so that was nice.
Ya it's a club level thing. Everywhere else seems to stand.
We’ve got seats in the club level and it’s unfortunate that we can’t stand if we feel like it.
by Woodinville_12thMan on Dec 1, 2011 9:49 PM PST up reply actions
I got tonight's tickets when family friends had to cancel
so this was a bit of a sampler of the club experience. There’s a lot to like, and not freezing to death while ordering food is pleasant, but worrying about if someone behind me is going to passive-aggressively lob ushers at me is a bit of a downer.
every play
Is a big play. Potentially.
What’s with people these days? It would be so much easier, and more fun, if they would just have a beer, relax, and go with it. I’ve been questioning whether the Clink is at all as noisy as in years past, it just hasn’t sounded the same on TV lately. I was hoping it was sound booth editing, but if this kind of pure bitchiness is going on in the stands, maybe this is why it’s quieter?
I go to my one game of the year next week, and I intend to find my seat in 137, grab one of many beers, and scream my head off for 3+ hours. And watch one “big play” after another.
by TrynZushi on Dec 1, 2011 10:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
That is BS!
Beastquakes don’t come sitting down! Get up Hawk fans or get the hell out of our stadium!
Any news on Okung?
Can’t afford to lose him now.
"You are the molders of their dreams." - Clark Mollenhoff
Seriously
It’s frustrating because I can’t focus on how awesome that game was. Need to just rewatch BEEF MO clips.
Great win.
Even as a Rams fan, it warms my heart to see a team playing sound football like that, through almost the entire game. Even better that it came against the Dream Team. /sadtrombone
by Abrantes on Dec 1, 2011 9:33 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Thanks =)
Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.
by Nick Andron on Dec 1, 2011 9:47 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Take that national media!!
Someone outside Seattle/Phillie and/or a non-Seahawk/Eagle fan watched this game. Ha!
We, in this week of football, are leading the nfl
In all statistical categories……… Until sunday. But yeah, GO SEAHAWKS.
Watching the Seahawks is like peeing on yourself, everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling it brings
Ok ALMOST every category
Watching the Seahawks is like peeing on yourself, everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling it brings
It was Okung who blasted the last guy...
…who could have stopped Marshawn from getting out of that pile and going in for the TD. Hope he’s all right.
Yeah
We can’t afford that loss. Guy has been lights out and is developing into a star on the left side of our line.
Right friggin' on Seahawks!!!
On National TV folks. every fan in America knows these guys are for real now. I just hope they get with it & get Beastmo ,Red,and Mr.Hill signed for a few more seasons
Browner is still over-rated in my book
He had 2 picks but the 2nd one (?) should have been a completion on a fairly wide-open seam or in route and the first was a horrible throw from VY (he did make a nice play on it though). The penalties (PI and illegal contact every game…) are still happening and they seem to happen at the most painful times. The penalty tonight was not too bad but over the year they have really angered me and in the Washington game helped them win immensely.
Sherman on the other hand is looking polished, made some very nice open-field tackles tonight and had solid coverage. He is displaying swagger and skill at corner this year already. I think we go after another CB this year or hope WT3 or Trufant can hold down the other side with Sherman.
Browner is still a nice commodity to have and I really don’t mind him starting, just would rather another Sherman (or Champ Bailey, Revis type!).
by Seahawk_Superbowl on Dec 1, 2011 9:47 PM PST reply actions
I don't think Browner is good
But 4 INTs is 4 INTs.
Seahawks now have 16 interceptions on the year.
I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.
by SSreporters on Dec 1, 2011 9:58 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Browner is still green as hell.
If he can just cut down on the PIs a little bit (his aggressive style of play will always result in at least a few flags) then QBs will be scared shitless to throw at him.
Browner is a beast
He is just raw. He is huge and stayed with Desean Jackson the plays he covered him. He is a little too aggressive and doesn’t get turned around to the ball enough in coverage (which is part of the causes for PI’s) but he is going to be very good. Just needs more game time. To have Sherman and Browner, two big cb’s, it’s going to be hard to throw or run to the outside on us when they both put it together.
I think you got the int order wrong as well. The first pick was the perfect pass to Riley Cooper that he dropped and went right into Browner’s hand. So I agree that pick wasn’t a great play by him, he left Cooper open in the first place, but he did make the play when the ball hit his hands. The Hawks have been killed by dropped int’s in the past. The last int was a great play by Browner where VY was trying to make a play on a go route to Cooper again. The ball might have been a little under thrown but Browner’s size and athletic abilty allowed him to go up and get the pick.
He seemed to be looking back on the last one though
I think he probably could’ve gotten his hands up to bat it down at least
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:53 AM PST up reply actions
It's not just that he doesn't turn around...
Bowner also likes to get at least one leg into a receiver’s pants if he can. That’s fine inside of five yards but come on. He might still be thinking in meters.
It’s going to take more than one good game for me to get back on the BrownerWagon after that Redskins game. He seemed determined to make sure they gained at least 48 yards on 3rd and 17 or whatever it was.
Ah, hello my slow fat fingers say to Lord Humongous
-Kingdomer
by EthelGemerman on Dec 2, 2011 5:05 PM PST up reply actions
He's at least an average CB.
Even with the penalties, I much prefer him to Kelly “I Have No Idea Where the Ball Is” Jennings.
if it came gift wrapped to ol' bone bag...
…he’d have it bounce off his helmet and right to the WR he was covering.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:02 PM PST up reply actions
True that.
And Curry would have done the same to the pass that Heater took back for six.
That's assuming that Curry would've even seen McCoy coming out of the backfield
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 10:13 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Wouldn't Kelly Jennings
not even be in the vascinity to have the ball hit off his helmet? I just think the receiver would automatically be open and score a td.
Nah, Jennings usually had pretty good coverage and was in the area to make a play
He just never knew where the ball was or the WR would just out-muscle him for the spot and make the catch.
Thanks for the clarification
I don’t miss that guy.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:05 AM PST up reply actions
nice takedown, though
and funky sideways filming
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 9:50 PM PST up reply actions
I think that explains the late 4th down call
I think Pete was po’d at that play to Okung, so thats why he called the play action play on 4th down rather than just kick the ball or run a play into the pile. And the target was Miller, who was the vicitm of another cheap shot earlier in the game
That makes a lot of sense.
I actually didn’t notice that Okung was injured, so when they ran that play action play I immediately thought it was a little classless and was kind of happy we didn’t score. But after seeing that play, I wish we had scored and then gone for two.
Ditto. I also thought it was classless at first, but after seeing the Cole play
it’s clear the Miller pass was a direct response… giving the Eagles the finger.
Can't belive Cole didn't get flagged on that play.
He better get a fine; that throw was totally unwarranted.
The Eagles didn't get flagged for a lot of cheap sh##
A lot. That was one of the few. They were slapping Seahwk players in the helmet and face after plays right in front of officials. Okung was asking for flags on at least 5 seperate plays. The officials allowed Okung to get hurt because the way they allowed Philly to continuously play after the whistle. Screw you Trent Cole, you Jackwagon. And screw you officials too!
on that note...
i was in the stadium, and having a few drinks, so it was hard to tell… but sometime later in the second half, one of our players had a helmet go flying off and bouncing 10 yards down the field. on the replay, it showed an eagles player running up to him and doing a jumping elbow chuck to the head… did anyone else see that?
also, what was up with the clock running from 2:15 down to the two minute warning after M. Robinson was pushed out of bounds after a 15 yard screen pass gain? Clock stops on an out of bounds play doesn’t it? maybe just not for the Seahawks. Refs much absolutely hate Carroll
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
I didn't pay attention at the time, so may be off
The rule states that the clock starts again once the ball is spotted. Only in the last 2 minutes does the clock remain stopped until the ball is snapped.
I also believe the clock only stops if the player goes out of bounds while moving forward or of his own volition. If his forward progress is stopped and he’s forced out of bounds by the defender, the clock keeps running. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong, however.
i don't think he went to the ground
but arguably my view was from across the field and slightly obscured by players…but it looked like he went out of bounds with lots of forward momentum
I was more shocked at the elbow chuck to the head… think it was late in the 4th quarter, and it was the only time I think a hawks helmet went bounding across the field…
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
My guess then is that they stopped the clock temporarily to reset the ball
then ran off the remaining 15 seconds. I was at the bar last night and didn’t see the exact play, so I could be wrong. If he went out of bounds moving forward on his own, the clock should have stopped until the ball was set and then re-started. If he went out and the clock kept running, that’s weird.
by SmartAssCoug on Dec 2, 2011 11:22 AM PST up reply actions
I think the helmet incident was Alan Branch, if I remember
They showed it pretty clearly on TV.
I’m not sure about the 2 minute thing with Robinson—I didn’t see that play.
The Smart ass coug got the rules right I think
If you are forced out of bounds the clock continues to run unless you go out of bounds yourself. Even then the clock continues once the ball is spotted, only time it doesn’t is under 2 min of the half.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:08 AM PST up reply actions
I saw the helmet play
It was Alan Branch and he was pissed off about it. Then again the officials just allowed the Eagles to do that the whole game. They were getting out played so Philly resorted to cheap shots after the plays. That is not Andy Reid’s MO, I respect him as a coach a lot. Seems like he has lost his locker room. Punk ass eagles!
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:10 AM PST up reply actions
In the Bengals game, right at the end,
I think Leon Washington was down after a run and some defender laying on top of him gave him a few of the ol’ humpity humps before letting him up. Was that Washington? Anyway, it was in no way accidental and it was on tv. There’s a game where the Bengals’ ‘aggressiveness’ maybe got a little out of control. Couldn’t we bribe the officials just to enforce the existing rules when we play at home?
Ah, hello my slow fat fingers say to Lord Humongous
-Kingdomer
by EthelGemerman on Dec 2, 2011 5:13 PM PST up reply actions
Worried about Okung
but I hope the what, 9 or 10 days suit him well. Can’t lose him too.
What I liked about the offense was that they put the Eagles offense in the position to go back to their only reliable playmaker who was healthy-ish – McCoy. That 10 min drive killed their chances, IMO, because for the simple fact that it took so long and the offense had built such a lead up to that point.
Good all-round game, I feel refreshed because it’s been so long since we’ve seen one of those.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 9:51 PM PST reply actions
Also
we all felt like BMW needed to have a big game today (sadly….didn’t happen) but do any of you feel like Tate might be usurping a roster spot? He’s really come out to play last few games, and I’m not saying that this is what’s going to happen, but he’s making more plays than BMW.
I’m still rooting for BMW but…my hopes are slowly diminishing.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 9:53 PM PST up reply actions
BMW is not performing when he finally does get the chance.
I have had no reason to think we will bring him back next year, he almost seems like a weight. I know he is a good guy and I hear he is good in the locker room or chemistry or the like but when you are holding the team back that will change.
by Seahawk_Superbowl on Dec 1, 2011 9:56 PM PST up reply actions
Not immune to cuts, unless the guaranteed was decent.
I hope he can be effective somehow but I haven’t seen it yet. By effective, I mean as a #2-3 receiver. He could be deadly in situational endzone sets.
by Seahawk_Superbowl on Dec 1, 2011 10:46 PM PST up reply actions
Personally
I’d give him one more year for the offseason he missed with Tjack and/or Tjack’s replacement. See if that relationship comes about next year
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:52 AM PST up reply actions
Obo, good Golden, Rice, Baldwin, and Durham/Butler
Good enough for me.
I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.
Did butler get in today?
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:00 PM PST up reply actions
He was active.
Didn’t see how many snaps he got in though and definitely didn’t get a pass thrown to him.
I saw him out there for three snaps
by Matt Erickson on Dec 1, 2011 10:28 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
The thing I'm taking away from this season is depth
We keep losing people and new guys seem to play even better than the guys who get hurt in many cases; offensive line, Tate filling for Rice, DBs, LBs…
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
by Azimeir on Dec 1, 2011 9:52 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Sherman is heck of a find
And Golden secretly has been playing very well. His blocks have been key. On Marshawn’s first TD, he delivers a key block for Marshawn to go in for the TD.
Speaking of Sherman....
ESPN…..don’tever disrespect me like that again!! we do nothing but shut wr’s down….we don’t need u calling us slow
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 9:58 PM PST up reply actions 6 recs
YEAH!
Hahahah, this guy is going to be a fan favorite for years to come!
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:00 PM PST up reply actions
Loving the Dikembe finger wagging!
Hope that becomes a staple of his.
by William Bryan on Dec 1, 2011 10:10 PM PST up reply actions
I was reading the article he was talking about
He was referencing this article by Matthew Berry. I loved his little finger wag though. He has some swag!
Ouch
Vince Young, QB, Eagles: Told you guys that an Andy Reid quarterback would put up big fantasy points! (Bangs head against desk until it bleeds profusely). Anyway, the Seahawks are actually tough to run on, but easy to throw against. Seahawks corners are slow, slow, slow. In fact, they fail to pass the all-telling “Rex test.” As in, when Rex Grossman throws for 314 and two scores against you, the sky is the limit for good quarterbacks. Especially with DeSean Jackson and Riley Cooper beating these guys deep. Young’s 84 pass attempts in two weeks are skewed a bit by the junk time in the massive blowout loss to the Patriots, but he had 36 passes in a win against the Giants. If you’re scrambling a bit this week (see what I did there? Scrambling? Vince? Whatever, it’s a Thursday game. You never waste the good jokes on the Thursday game), Young is available in 92 percent of leagues and should be a very solid top-10 play.
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 11:08 PM PST up reply actions
He went beyond just saying slow, he exaggerated.
Maybe he is considering “big and physical” synonymous with “slow, slow, slow.”If Sherman can get himself fired up over things like this I surely could get used to him playing with this much intensity. Love this team’s attitude. And thanks for highlighting the section. It’s late and I didn’t feel like searching through the article for it.
Considering big to be synonymous with slow is not unreasonable.
Also, our corners are pretty slow.
Ah, hello my slow fat fingers say to Lord Humongous
-Kingdomer
by EthelGemerman on Dec 2, 2011 5:18 PM PST up reply actions
I bet Matt over-hypes Cooper's one catch to try and redeem himself.
Notice how I said “one.” Other than that big catch (setting up Philly’s 1st TD), Eagles receivers were very quiet in this game.
And, hey, Browner didn’t look so slow running back that pick.
Whatever.
Those fantasy football analysts are a joke. Nevermind that I don’t play, nor do I care for, fantasy football, but the real (good) analysts are actually real analysts. Good for Sherman for proving this guy wrong.
He actually reached a pretty logical conclusion.
Our pass defense has not been inspiring much confidence. Vince Young is just awful.
It's only logical if you don't do any research and make claims based on your preconceived notions
The Seahawks secondary hasn’t been great, but very specific kinds of receivers have been killing them (i.e. Wallace). In addition, the Redskins were playing from behind THE ENTIRE GAME which led to Rex’s 35 pass attempts. Clearly not a great game from them, but the 314 yards are understandable.
Had he done any research he would’ve seen that the Seahawks pass defense has not been awful lately. They got bitten by Romo a few weeks back (279 yards) but aside from that they didn’t allowed good QB performances from the Rams, Ravens, Bengals, or Browns. I wouldn’t have been confident even starting Vick if he was playing.
Did we watch the same game on Sunday?
The Redskins were up 7-0 on their first drive. We didn’t take a lead until midway through the 3rd quarter and that was only 3 points. Our 10 point lead came about 3 minutes into the fourth quarter.
In the meantime, Grossman had about 150 yards passing through the first 20 minutes of the game.
by SmartAssCoug on Dec 2, 2011 11:51 AM PST up reply actions
It's been good against those crappy QB's, yes.
Every good offense we’ve played against has hurt us through the air, including the Bengals. The fact that we shut down Kevin Kolb, Colt McCoy, Joe Flacco, and Sam Bradford is of little comfort to me.
Isn't Desean Jackson sort of Wallace-like?
Ah, hello my slow fat fingers say to Lord Humongous
-Kingdomer
by EthelGemerman on Dec 2, 2011 5:19 PM PST up reply actions
No. Maclin (out) is Wallace like...
DeSean is more Santonio Holmes or Baldwin like.
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
Logical perhaps...
Based on stats, not on even casual review of tape.
The Hawks secondary has been pretty good. It’s the pass rush that’s been lacking. Guys can’t cover receivers forever.
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
and a good chuck of yards in the passing game are
given up to TEs and RBs, which are traditionally not covered by corners. I think both Browner and Sherman are slow out of the gates and on cuts, but both have enough top end speed that with improved technique and more experience they will be a very nice tandem. I am not sure how much upside there is for Browner as he has been at this for 4 years as a pro, but Sherman is only in his 2nd year ever as a DB – so I predict he could have a leap in production in year 2 or 3…
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
Slow, slow, slow
Guess he spoke too soon! Go Hawks! I love our corners. Definitely refreshing over Jenings and the oft hurt Trufant.
I wasn't thinking that last week with the OL
But this game made up for it.
by Seahawk_Superbowl on Dec 1, 2011 10:06 PM PST up reply actions
Losing to the Redskins and Browns really hurts
7-5 would look soooo good right now.
One better than the G-men, right?
That’d put us right up there in the Wildcard contention.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 9:54 PM PST up reply actions
Imagine a wild card going to an NFC West team...
I met a possum.
by s0merand0mdude on Dec 1, 2011 9:55 PM PST up reply actions
Then PUKE PUKE PUKE
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 9:58 PM PST up reply actions
Possibly my favorite part of that crazy mo fo
I saw that on the sideline and started laughing thinking “too many skittles”.
Beast Mode - 146 yards to reach 1,000
He might get it next week.
I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.
I'll say he finishes with around 1,200 yards rushing this year.
by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 1, 2011 10:02 PM PST up reply actions
dunno
we have Stl, Chi, SF, and Ariz up coming. I don’t think he gets 100+ against Chi or SF, so I think he probably gets to 1100 max. Still a good accomplishment for the o-line
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:03 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, don't see a win happening there
I think we’ll make it close but it’s not going to happen. PCJS are going to have to work some magic to get into the top 10 or 5 of the draft to get a QB, if that’s their plan.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:06 PM PST up reply actions
If SF is resting DL/LB we can win
If not we would need to win turnovers and/or TOP or lose. It will be an interesting matchup, 2 good run D’s, running offenses, capable QB’s.
by Seahawk_Superbowl on Dec 1, 2011 10:15 PM PST up reply actions
I don't see at all why we can't beat San Francisco at home.
Totally doable. Pete will have guys ready, Niners better play four quarters if they want the W.
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
We are pretty much built to beat the 49ers.
That first game was close until special teams crapped the bed.
Ah, hello my slow fat fingers say to Lord Humongous
-Kingdomer
by EthelGemerman on Dec 2, 2011 5:21 PM PST up reply actions
This is me being optimistic. 1200 is my number.
by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 1, 2011 10:06 PM PST up reply actions
Oh okay
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:07 PM PST up reply actions
I just went from six to midnight...
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
by Azimeir on Dec 1, 2011 10:09 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Wow, Desean Jackson sounded like a little bitch during his post-game interview.
I thought the Seahawks would be a great place for him to land next year, not anymore.
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 10:07 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Didn't hear it, I'll have to visit that later
I had to feel for VY though, he shed a fair amt of tears after his pick six.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 1, 2011 10:09 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
It was running on SportsCenter
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 10:09 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Used to get ESPN
not anymore, Comcast wanted to rape me old family backwards and my mom said ‘fuck you’
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:25 AM PST up reply actions
I'm on his side.
The reporters were asking him some very annoying questions. I’d have been pissed, too.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Dec 1, 2011 10:35 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
The mo0ment he dons a Seahawks uniform, he'd snap like a twug.
He’s not injury prone….yet. But he has too small a frame, and I don’t trust him to improve his game. Let someone else roll the dice with him.
Giving up so many rushing yards doesn't bother me.
It means the other team is wasting time. Loved the defensive performance. Some of those INTs were gifts, but Earl Thomas played great, as did Clemons and K.J. Wright. Promising stuff.
by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 1, 2011 10:08 PM PST reply actions
Thomas was great beyond that terrible play that left Cooper 15 yards open
I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.
by SSreporters on Dec 1, 2011 10:09 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Love Thomas' game but
I think Clemons is the unsung hero of the game. He made a bunch of hustle plays and I think it was obvious he was setting an emotional tone against his former team.
by William Bryan on Dec 1, 2011 10:12 PM PST up reply actions
Agreed.
I specifically remember him running down Shady from behind and wrapping up for a no gain.
by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 1, 2011 10:15 PM PST up reply actions
That was a nice play
then he got in Andy’s face and risked a taunting penalty.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 10:23 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah I was freaking out. I assumed we were gonna get flagged.
Bunch of dirtbags!
by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 1, 2011 10:44 PM PST up reply actions
CRAZY STAT OF THE NIGHT:
The Eagles had 8 or more defenders in the box on 17 of Beef Moe’s 22 rushes.
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 10:09 PM PST reply actions 6 recs
GET OFF ME!
Beef Moe don’t care.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 10:12 PM PST up reply actions
Hell of a stat
I’m not sure how many plays were in 22 formation but it was very effective. The tightends were destroying the Eagle’s ends.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 12:13 PM PST up reply actions
If the Seahawks win out ...
they have a decent shot at the playoffs. Look at the remaining schedule of the three teams vying for the sixth spot.
CHI: K.C., @DEN, Sea, @GB, @MIN
DET: @NO, MIN, @OAK, SD, @GB
NYG: GB, @DAL, WAS, @NYJ, DAL
We need the Giants to lose two, and the Bears and Detroit to lose three each (the Seahawks would give the Bears one of those losses if they win out). We absolutely need Tebow to beat the Bears. It could come down to the final week (unless the Seahawks lose earlier, of course).
by Nshima on Dec 1, 2011 10:10 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
too mny ifs in that scenario
I just want to see them establsih themselves as contenders for next season
Agree with that.
I’ll be happy with 8-8, but am always dreaming about the playoffs.
by Nshima on Dec 1, 2011 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Hell yeah
Always dreaming about the playoffs. That last week loss to Washington really hurt, even more now. I still think we have a shot. I believe!
We need the Falcons and the Cowboys to win their respective divisions first
Key Game at Chicago, as that will basically decide our whole season
We hold the tiebreaker over the Giants, so we just need one more loss from the Cowboys or Jets (Packers will beat them)
Detroit has a brutal sechdule ahead of themselves, not to mention Best being out.
"You are the molders of their dreams." - Clark Mollenhoff
Saints are already 8-3
Even if the Falcons win their division, sure bet that the Saints gets the #5 seed. In reality, we have to win out AND hope neither the Bears, Giants and Lions don’t win 10 games (and I’m not sure how we stack up with Detroit, tiebreaker-wise).
Lots of winnable games left
but the likelihood of winning out is very, very small.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 10:13 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, it's slim
The Bears and Niners are going to be tough.
Im not worried about the bears
If we play like we did tonight. Hanie and shitty receivers. Just have to limit Forte and pressure the backup QB.
by Seahawk_Superbowl on Dec 1, 2011 10:26 PM PST up reply actions
Offensively the Bears seems very similar to the banged up Eagles at this point.
I don’t think we’re scoring thirty on the road against that D though.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
You can't count on the Bears mailing it in
I suspect they will be a bit more motivated than the Eagles were tonight. A win there is possible, but not easy
Game Ball: All of our linebackers
Wright with sack/FF, Hill with sack, Hawthorne with game-clinching INT.
Defense stepped up against a very dangerous team even with Young at QB.
Jackson did alright tonight throwing, too.
I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.
Sure.
So when our teammates aren’t stepping on his fecking ankles the Eagles cheap-shot him.
I respect your opinion even though it's wrong.
Oh well.
Shut him down too, I’m sure he will be ready by next September. I’m tired of agonizing over this guy’s injuries, and this season is too weird to feel like much has been lost.
(if it’s career ending feel free to just beat the shit out of me though)
I don't think I've ever heard of a career ending pectoral injury.
I don’t think it’ll have any long term effect (if it is indeed his pectoral injury and not the shoulder).
Stolen from 4chan

Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Dec 1, 2011 10:36 PM PST reply actions 4 recs
We should pool our money and buy Beast a penguin.
by jhmg16 on Dec 1, 2011 10:37 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
That seriously made me laugh.
That made my night.
Watching the Seahawks is like peeing on yourself, everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling it brings
by DKrottenhawk on Dec 1, 2011 10:41 PM PST up reply actions
Did anybody thing Lynch would be this good?
I didn’t. Until beastquake, I thought he was overrated. After that, I thought, “Wow, he could be really good.”
I'm still concerened that his effort is just up
because of it being a contract year. Dreading him being the next Shaun Alexander/CJ0K.
This is hands down his best game as a hawk, right?
For one night John Harbaugh was right about him. If 85% of tonight is the new baseline, I’ll take it.
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
Always a concern
But he’s always had this kind of effort
Pissed that Hawthornes INT for touchdown was not part of Sportscenters top 10 plays.
At least Lynch’s 15 yard TD was #1
Eternally looking forward to someone making a Seahawks song based off of Lil' Jon's "Shots" song named "Hawks!"
Nope.
They didn’t even show the catch on the highlight package for the game on SportsCenter.
by wyte_lightning on Dec 1, 2011 11:06 PM PST up reply actions
That was an incredibly athletic catch
it just wasn’t the showiest of plays.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 1, 2011 11:14 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, also a great pass by Tarvaris
He didn’t have much room for error.
They showed it during the preview of Top 10 plays though.
It doesn’t necessarily count but they played it at the end of the preview and they played Raible’s call.
ESPN is horrible
I try my best not to watch sportscenter, they are so east coast biased! I hate sportscenter. We need another 24 hr sports network based out of the west coast. Maybe then we can get a highlight. I highly doubt that there were 9 plays better than Marshawn Lynch’s second TD, Hawthornes int for a td, and definitely not the Golden catch.
Loved how they glossed over that fact in the post game show
Rich Eisen, increduously, even gave them all a chance to rethink it. Saying (paraphrasing) “no one thinks this team, at Clink, has a chance? Flying across the country on a short week? huh.” The experts just remained silent. Love it. Even with that, I think the NFLN has the far superior coverage compared to ESPN. Rich Eisen is great and they have a bunch of HOF players working as analysts while ESPN has one or two HOF’s and a bunch of idiots.
by William Bryan on Dec 1, 2011 11:16 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
NFLN does superb work. Then again, they only have one game to worry about each week.
Eisen is the best in the business, for my money.
by jhmg16 on Dec 1, 2011 11:26 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Agreed
I really enjoyed the commentary during the game. Much better than ESPN. I really like Rich Eisen but I have to disagree, Dan Patrick is the best for my money!
Kenny Mayne is a good one
I still like DP better, but Mayne is good. ESPN just needs to bring back the old gang huh? Where is Charlie Steiner anyway?
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
I loved that. And especially when Deion and Irvin talked about the Hawks on seperate occasions,
and had no idea what they were talking about. Didn’t know who Hawthorne was, or the fact that Golden doesn’t run good routes.
by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 1, 2011 11:17 PM PST up reply actions
I cracked up when he said that after the TD catch
“Golden Tate, known for his great route running, I’m surprised they don’t go to him more.”
uhhhhhh.
by B.B.Finnegan on Dec 1, 2011 11:18 PM PST up reply actions
I would like to take this opportunity to say
FUCK DEION
FUCK THAT COKEHEAD IRVIN
FUCK THE COWBOYS
GO HAWKS.
that is all.
sorry for the language
I grew up in a 49ers home through the Montana and Young years, so also- fuck Troy Aikman.
Don't be sorry
Both of those idiots did nothing but talk shit about the Seahawks, Seattle, and our fans throughout their entire broadcast. Pathetic display of professionalism.
Yeah
I was complaining about those fools too. Deion said McCoy would run all over us. Doesn’t he know we have a really good run defense? Irvin and him didn’t even know who Tate or Hawthorne was. Really pathetic.
I really like NFLN over ESPN, but wioth those two idiots, it’s hard to watch.
McCoy did do pretty good though
good thing was our offense put them in the position that they couldn’t use a ground-heavy game to get back into it b/c of time management.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:41 AM PST up reply actions
McCoy DID run all over us
He’s the type of speedy RB our defense really struggles with. He was pretty much just as productive as Lynch. The only difference is that their defense didn’t get any turnovers.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 2, 2011 9:18 AM PST up reply actions
I don't think he ran all over us
He didn’t really get going until the second half. I agree he had a good game though and would of had a better game had we been in a closer situation. The way Deion said it at the beginning of the broadcast was basically he was going to run our ass out of Seattle.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:16 AM PST up reply actions
It was the respect Deion gave our run defense before the game even started
Like we didn’t belong in the game with the Eagles.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:17 AM PST up reply actions
I loved the quote at the end of the broadcast where one of the announcers said
“When the Seahawks play like this at home, they can be a real pain in the butt.”
That’s the extent of the respect our Hawks get. Embarrassing.
The Seahawks never win, they only make you lose
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 2, 2011 10:56 AM PST up reply actions
Great statement
I was just complaining that when we win games, it is always about how the other team lost, not how we won.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 11:14 AM PST up reply actions
Not to mention after the fun Pike Place gag reel of trash talking
Deion said something like, “Can I please get on my flight” with a smart-ass grin, as if Seattle is the dirty underbelly of the country. Was it too loud for him?
by sonse7en on Dec 2, 2011 1:54 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Mike Lombardi praised "their 3-tech Brandon McBane" earlier in the evening. That was funny.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Dec 2, 2011 12:47 PM PST up reply actions
That was a little insulting...
Get a f*cking program for shissakes.
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
The TGIT No Huddle crew didn't make picks but all expressed
a lot of doubt that Philly had a shot.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Dec 2, 2011 12:45 PM PST up reply actions
This is great
Michael Robinson quotes from Sando
“I don’t know what happened,” fullback Michael Robinson said. “My nose started bleeding, man. I hit, my nose bled, I looked up, he scored and I’m getting ready for kickoff. That is how it happens.”
by B.B.Finnegan on Dec 1, 2011 11:20 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
What a game.
BeefMo – We have a running back for the first time since the heyday of Shawn Alexander.
Robinson – Does anyone else remember John L Williams and his catches in the flat? Yeah, that.
Golden Tate – Young man, you might just wind up being a number one receiver for this team yet. Tate made perhaps the greatest TD catch for the Hawks of the past half decade.
T-Jack – One wonders if he could play as well as he did last night every game if he weren’t injured. If we knew the answer to that, we’d know if we needed a QB in the draft after all.
Defence.- Damn boys, just damn. 4 picks? one for a TD to seal it? I am highly impressed. ESPECIALLY by Browner. good comeback from Sunday kid.
What this team is developing here is an identity. Smash mouth running offense, stingy, opportunistic defense. Basically the Ravens of 2000 to about ’05. I can get behind that..
We need a QB in the draft
Even if one were to assume TJ could play this well consistently, we are anorexic at the position.
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
by Azimeir on Dec 2, 2011 8:09 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I agree 100% and was thinking the exact same thing.
I thought Jackson played well and I still like despite last week’s effort, but whether he’s playing QB for us for a long time or not, we really need to draft a QB early.
TJack didn't have a great game per se
he was efficiently game managerish – remember his sack where he tried the old ‘fake pass hope you jump" move? I haven’t seen that since playing a freestyle football game in 9th grade after practice….
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:27 AM PST up reply actions
How about the Ravens of 1999?
That would mean they win the Super Bowl next year. The Ravens were 8-8 in 1999. It would also mean that we should draft a defensive player (pass-rusher!) next year, not a QB. Tarvaris can certainly be as good as Dilfer.
Jackson's problem
Is that he’s never mediocre. He’s great or he’s used asswipe. His overall stats are mediocre, but he never plays mediocre games.
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
Oh
I won my bet with my Dad. He said th Hawks wouldn’t win 5 games this year. I said they would.
$20 in my gas tank.
Ha! Nice bet
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:26 AM PST up reply actions
Cool
I at first said we’d win 8 games, my pops said 3. After I watched our preseason games and the way the Oline looked, I thought 3 was too many wins. The guys up front are really putting it together. It’s awesome. Looks like 8, hopefully 9, is a good number for us. Go Hawks!
Hopefully you worded the bet such that you also win on 5+ wins.
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
hahahaha nice one
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:49 AM PST up reply actions
Nice!
I don’t know how he got out of that mess.
Beast Mo'pheus
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
by pqlqi on Dec 2, 2011 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You all should check this out
Skittles is offering Marshawn Lynch a 24-month free supply & a customized dispenser for his locker for last night’s exposure.
https://twitter.com/#!/darrenrovell/status/142624294411829248
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 8:58 AM PST reply actions
Ha ha
I was wondering about that. They got a ton of free advertising everywhere last night. It almost seemed planned.
The best part is a customized dispenser
he should have it shaped like his face, and when the mouth opens skittles flow out
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 9:17 AM PST up reply actions
That was Mark Hamill's dream, apparently
he always wanted to be a Pez dispenser…and after playing Luke, he got it.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 9:21 AM PST up reply actions
NIce factoid
I haven’t had a pez dispenser in years, since I was a little kid. If Marshawn Lynch had one, I’d buy it.
by datboyeddiep on Dec 2, 2011 12:09 PM PST up reply actions
How many baggies do we imagine constitute a 24-month supply?
One per day, so, 730?
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
We get no respect
The only thing on NFL. com is a little story on Marshawn eating his skittles.
Do not make the mistake of underestimating the Skittles.....
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 2, 2011 2:12 PM PST up reply actions

by 
































