Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Seahawks Come On Strong In Second Half, Beat Bears 38-14

Photo

The Seahawks apparently made some solid adjustments at the half after going into the locker room down 14-7, scoring 31 unanswered points in the second half to run away with a solid road victory, 38-14.

The first half was decidedly ugly - the Seahawks were sluggish on offense and looked vaguely similar to the Week 2, Week 3 version of this team. Tarvaris Jackson looked unsure, holding on to the football too long, the run game was picking up inches, not yards, and there was a marked timidness in their game. The way things started, it looked like it would be a very long game - 84 total yards in the first half on 29 plays. Tarvaris Jackson was 4 of 12 for 51 yards and a fumble in the endzone that the Bears recovered for a touchdown. The Hawks rushed for 34 yards on the ground on 16 carries, a 2.1 average.

The defense fared a little better than the O in the first half, holding the Bears' offense to only 7 points; Earl Thomas picked off a Kam Chancellor-tipped pass in the Bears' endzone and Chancellor stripped Johnny Knox for a fumble that the Seahawks recovered. The defensive turnovers allowed the Seahawks to stay in the game, down only a touchdown at half. That said, the Bears' offensive numbers in the first half were decent - 88 yards rushing on 21 attempts, 92 yards through the air with Caleb Hanie going 7 for 12, with a TD and an interception.

The second half was another story though. The Hawks took the kickoff to start and put together a five-play, 80-yard drive that finished with a Marshawn Lynch TD to tie the game at 14. They wouldn't look back after that.

Chicago's eight second half possessions would look like this - interception at their own 28, punt from their 23, punt from their 15, punt from their 19, punt from their 33, interception at their 30, interception at their 29, and end of game.

Seattle got two touchdowns from Marshawn Lynch, one by Red Bryant on an interception, one by Michael Robinson on a nice underneath pass by Tarvaris Jackson, and one from Brandon Browner on a pick-six. Steven Hauschka tacked on a field goal.

On the game, Seattle's defense forced five turnovers - four picks and a fumble recovery. Tarvaris Jackson finished 19 for 31 for 227 yards, a touchdown and no picks, though that one fumble in the endzone was costly. Marshawn Lynch rushed for 42 yards on 20 carries, and punched it in twice. Lynch now has 1,011 yards rushing with 11 touchdowns on the season.

Overall, the second half was a thing of beauty for the Hawks. They wore down the Bears defense despite a miniscule 1.8 yards per carry on the ground, picking up key first downs and a few explosive plays to maintain possessions. They won the time of possession battle 31:37 - 28:23, and won the turnover battle 5-1, putting them at +14 on the season.

Winning on the road in this fashion is always a good thing, despite the Bears' issues with injuries on offense.

More coming soon, but let's hear your thoughts...


Follow @FieldGulls on Twitter | Like Field Gulls on Facebook


Comment 136 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm amazed at how well our replacement level OL is playing.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 18, 2011 2:04 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

If Cable departs for a head coaching job this offseason, can we keep it going?

Pat Ruel — Assistant Offensive Line Coach
Luke Butkus — Quality Control, Offensive Line
Pat McPherson — Tight Ends Coach
Dave Canalis — Quality Control, Offense.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:05 PM PST up reply actions  

By the way, are there 'quality control' positions on many NFL staffs?

Anybody have a line on how they do their thing?

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it's an entry-level coaching job
They do have some on-field duties in practices, often they work with one or more position coaches to gain experience as they prepare to become position coaches themselves. Callahan, for example, was the Broncos’ running backs coach for the final month of the season after Eric Studesville was promoted to interim coach.

But overall, a quality control assistant’s job is rooted in game preparation. They usually work at least one or two weeks ahead in the regular season.

They prepare the statistical analysis as well as the initial video study of upcoming opponents. The defensive quality control assistant breaks down opposing offenses, including how often they line up in specific formations and how they use various personnel groupings.

He charts down-and-distance situations, field position, substitutions, etc., and then gives that report to the team’s defensive staff when they begin their game planning each week during the regular season.

The offensive quality control assistant would do the same in regard to opposing defenses and then give the reports to the offensive staff.

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_17198145#ixzz1gwXpp0FC

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 18, 2011 6:22 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Nice. Thanks for grabbing that.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Other than Marshawn breaking 2 runs for a good gain,

the line and Marshawn did not have a good day overall. The Bears are a good run D team, and I was impressed that even though they struggled running, the managed to punch it in on the goal line.

by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 18, 2011 2:09 PM PST reply actions  

That's the most important part, I feel like

down in the red zone, deep in that area, we punched it in twice.

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 18, 2011 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Touche sir.

I agree with you, I just get frustrated when Beast Mode isn’t Beast Mode all game. Makes me sad.

by Neonjerseysplease on Dec 18, 2011 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's the 2nd game now

the running took a while to open up, and it affected the passing game too. The passing then opened the offense up later. I’d say the Bears line won the matchup, for the most part, though eventually it looked rather one-sided.

I pretty much expect the same stuff from these last 2 games.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Dec 19, 2011 12:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Not at all

At least we didnt lose to these teams

by clutterheart on Dec 18, 2011 2:26 PM PST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

I'll relax when this D proves that it's not 2007 all over again.

McCoy, Dalton, Flacco, Bradford twice, Grossman, Young, Hanie…ick. Not very impressive.

But everyone else is making good points, too. I shall hold off on the bag over my head.

http://17power.blogspot.com

by Brandon8 on Dec 18, 2011 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

The big difference for me is that the 2007 defense was a finished product, and this team still feels like it's a work in progress.

They probably won’t get as lucky with the quarterbacks they face next year, but the defense is also likely to improve between now and then.

The one thing that worries me about the defense is that it’s a very healthy group beating up on teams that are worse for wear. Trufant is the only starter that’s out on the defense, and I doubt he’d still be starting today if he hadn’t gotten hurt. What happens if the start missing players at even an average rate?

by Nate Dogg on Dec 18, 2011 5:17 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Don't think so.

Browner and Trufant were the starters.

by Nate Dogg on Dec 18, 2011 7:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Still higher on the depth chart than the current starter

although Sherman has been a revelation as a 3rd-string corner

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 19, 2011 1:49 AM PST up reply actions  

It's not a list of all the QBs the Hawks have faced.

It’s a list of the bad QBs Seattle has faced, and there are a lot of them.

by Nate Dogg on Dec 18, 2011 7:27 PM PST up reply actions  

We had the toughest schedule in the NFL through the first 8 games base on win loss records

I think this D will considerably deeper next year. Does KJ Wright count as a starter cause it seemed like I haven’t heard of him until after the season started.

by Dick5 on Dec 19, 2011 12:22 AM PST up reply actions  

And we will not face a creampuff slate of opposition in the playoffs, either.

I’m interested in our playoff viability, not how well we bully the basement.

Wright – definitely a starter, though. God, Schneider just kills with those mid-round picks.

http://17power.blogspot.com

by Brandon8 on Dec 19, 2011 8:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Chiefs beat the Packers today.

You can’t qualify 24 point road wins in this league. Doesn’t matter who is playing.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Dec 18, 2011 2:27 PM PST up reply actions   3 recs

Nope.

Also Vince Young.

But the way those backups were dominated is what we are excited about. It’s pretty demoralizing when a backup looks even average against you.

by cashless on Dec 18, 2011 2:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Mediocre teams squeak past bad opponents like the Rams and the Bears. Recently, these Hawks have been destroying awful teams.

by fiftyone on Dec 18, 2011 2:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

And our O-line kept TJ out of the hospital vs. Peppers.

Everybody is beat up this time of year.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 18, 2011 2:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Really?

I’m just excited. I don’t need the reality check. Our team is getting better, they are not perfect but it’s okay to be excited.

by Billy Showbiz on Dec 18, 2011 7:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Certainly.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to be excited about. Our young and cheap defensive starters, the running game withstanding the tests of both consistency and good opposition, our depth, our attitude and perseverance – it’s great.

http://17power.blogspot.com

by Brandon8 on Dec 19, 2011 8:48 AM PST up reply actions  

The QBs could easily be more challenging, definitely.

Romo was probably the last good QB they faced. Didn’t defend that very well.

DVOA’s opponent adjustments drop their pass defense performance from just under baseline average (1.4%) to a bit worse 5.2% under baseline average. This is good for 11th in the league right now, which illustrates that this year’s passing offenses have been a cut above the baseline average overall.

2007’s defense deservedly had the most severe opponent adjustments in the league. Their performance without opponent adjustments made for the best in the league that year: go here and change the year to 2007. But yeah, the opponent adjustments were called for.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Dec 19, 2011 9:11 AM PST up reply actions  

But the best pass defense in the league didn't face murderer's row either.

Roethlisberger x2, Hasselbeck, Bradford, Sanchez, Schaub, Gabbert, Kolb, Jackson, Dalton, Alex Smith, McCoy, Orlovsky. They produce a stellar -27.3% against that crew and the opponent adjustments actually improve by a fraction. Despite our sharing about half of those QBs as opponents.

Opponent adjustments always seem weird, though. Baltimore came up against the first good passing game in a while and could barely stop the Chargers last night.

I’d qualify what I’ve seen from this year’s defense like this: in the past they’d often just seem to slow down mediocre QBs, get shredded by good QBs, and take turns destroying or being surprised by bad/backup QBs. With the current squad they’re mostly stopping a mediocre crew from impacting or controlling the game much at all — or defining the game by turnovers.

The next good passing game we see — which, I suppose would figure at this point to be the Packers in a guaranteed divisional round loss, should we have the dramatic fortune to make it that far — would surely be a different story. While I’d expect in a game like that for the Packers to beat this team handily, I’d not be surprised to see this physical man style of play to make a modest impact on the game, showing some decent pass defense. Just not enough to stop that team. Why the Chiefs were able to, I dunno. Trap game I suppose.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Dec 19, 2011 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

On a serious note...

I had no illusions about running the ball with sustained success against a Bears team that was still defending the run well and gearing up for a, “whatever happens, we don’t lose by allowing Marshawn 100 yards,” game.

I knew Tarvaris was going to have to convert some 3rd and Uglies or keep the ’Hawks out of 3rd and Ugly by making plays on 1st and 2nd down. I also knew the defense had to make Hanie lose the game, and they did it with pretty good pressure after the first half clustermakelove.

Once the "Hawks got that 10-point lead, I felt pretty confortable that the game was over.

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 18, 2011 2:27 PM PST reply actions  

I feel so good

I need a nap…

Learn JiuJitsu.
Semper Fi'
Look out! Marshawn Lynch is in BEEF MOE! "gimmie dem skittles! Om nom nom!"

by RolloTomasi on Dec 18, 2011 2:32 PM PST reply actions  

A Big Surprise...

Was hoping for a competitive game and edging in for the win, but this was beyond any wild expectation I had… This team is more interesting every week….

by IBGoofy on Dec 18, 2011 2:32 PM PST reply actions  

Golden Tate is coming to life

And Obomanu might be our best deep threat. I like it.

Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters

by SSreporters on Dec 18, 2011 2:38 PM PST reply actions  

I never knew obo could book it THAT fast, right around the corner

he blew right past the CB

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 18, 2011 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I also want to wish that Knox kid a speedy recovery...

And be thankful it’s not much, much worse. That was as hideous a looking injury as I’ve ever seen. =(

Most of my cliches aren't original.

- Chuck Knox

by Azimeir on Dec 18, 2011 2:39 PM PST reply actions   3 recs

YOUNG GUYS

Am really impressed with the young guys, KJ has had several good games lately! Go Hawks!

by Gonz_pty on Dec 18, 2011 2:41 PM PST reply actions  

Sad for BMW

Get well soon man

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 18, 2011 2:46 PM PST reply actions  

Wow.

I now know far more about the Beast Mode than I ever wanted to know.

"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992

by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 18, 2011 3:16 PM PST reply actions  

Was I the only one who pictured the cocaine loving bear

Whenever the chicago players had a big play? “I fucking love cocaine!”.

Watching the Seahawks is like peeing on yourself, everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling it brings

by DKrottenhawk on Dec 18, 2011 3:55 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Stupid phone

Great 2nd half adjustments on the Dline. Got the ends playing containment and that eliminated whatever game Hanie had.
TJax and Bevell started targeting the middle of the field.
Makes you wonder what the hell they do the whole week.

by vertigoman on Dec 18, 2011 4:16 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Ok

The chargers are playing really good right now , and are fighting for the playoffs. Root for them to win tonight, because if they win they have more realistic playoff chances. If they knock off the lions , I highly doubt the packers would be so arrogant and rest their starters and allow the lions to walk into the playoffs. Is all this a longshot ? Sure but oh well

by Matt509 on Dec 18, 2011 4:40 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Richardo Lockette

With BMW going down with a broken ankle Ricardo “The Rocket” Lockette will join the active squad next week. This youngster has 4.25 speed at 6-2, 211 pounds. I am excited to see what he can do. He is raw but Devin Hester fast. He will back up Leon as a kick returner (reverse anyone) and be our 5th WR.

by Patches Pal on Dec 18, 2011 4:49 PM PST reply actions  

Mike Will BROKE his ankle?

I heard he was OUT of the game but never heard he broke it. That blows! Another young guy in Lockette gonna get his shot now.

Twitter- @GriffinNW

by GriffinNW on Dec 18, 2011 8:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm officially pumped up to see

what this team is going to look like next season with a healthy line, a training camp, and a year plus with Cable’s teaching.

No matter who starts under center.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 18, 2011 4:56 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Defense is stud-riffic.

Tate continues to impress.

Baldwin needs more touches. Butler needs more touches.

Obo needs more touches.

With BMW and Rice out for the year, they should get them.

Still have my doubts that Seattle can win out but 8 and 8 would be huge given what this team has been through this year.

by Michael Harp on Dec 18, 2011 4:58 PM PST reply actions  

Sorry to bring up the "P" word... but how exactly does this team make the postseason?

Even if we win out, AND Detroit loses out… do we make it ahead of them on some kind of tiebreaker?

by djafrot on Dec 18, 2011 5:03 PM PST reply actions  

Yes.

Conference record.

Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters

by SSreporters on Dec 18, 2011 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

So, to be clear:

Seattle wins two of two, and Detroit loses one of two, and we’re in. No other scenarios?

Am I right?

by djafrot on Dec 18, 2011 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, no, I'm not.

Detroit needs to lose both. I am dumb.

by djafrot on Dec 18, 2011 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

another possibility- if the falcons lose out and we get into a 9-7 three way tie with them and basically any other team

(chi, nyg, dal) then we’ll be in due to conference record….if its head to head with them we’re out because of the loss.
they should lose to the saints on monday night so just need them to blow it against the bucs and then have someone else end up 9-7

unlikely scenarios but not impossible

by MNR11 on Dec 18, 2011 5:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, if we were missing our best quarterback, receivers (2), and running back we'd be whining too.

If that’s Cutler and Forte in there for Chicago this game is a LOT closer, if not a Chicago victory. We were getting barely any pressure on Hanie until the second half, and I’d be scared shitless to see Forte against any of our linebackers in the open field.

This isn’t to say that a lot of elements on this team haven’t improved, but let’s not blow everything out of proportion. At one point we were down 14-7 to a VERY BAD football team.

by djafrot on Dec 18, 2011 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

IDK, I reminded a few bears fans we were missing

3 starting linemen, 1 starting TE, 2 starting WR’s and our 5th WR, #1 & #2 starging corner and a starting QB w/ an injured pec on his throwing arm; not to mention th rest of our depth on IR.

Guess I had no real empathy for starters being out and excused for playing like they did.

by GnarlyHawk on Dec 18, 2011 5:44 PM PST up reply actions   3 recs

Cutler doesnt exactly exude pocket presence

And turns the ball over pretty regularly. Sure he’s a better QB but I doubt he extends plays like Hanie did in the first half.

Injuries are part of the game and we have more than our fair share.

by vertigoman on Dec 18, 2011 5:48 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Cutler is infinitely better than Hanie.

He doesn’t need to extend plays, because he can get the ball anywhere on the field and quickly. I think he would probably shred our defense what with its lack of pass rush.

by djafrot on Dec 18, 2011 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

"Yeah, if we were missing our best quarterback, receivers (2)"

But we don’t have a best QB, and are missing our best receivers and most of our line.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 18, 2011 6:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you arguing that we'd be just as well off with Charlie?

Other than Rice, who are we missing? BMW got hurt, but hasn’t been a factor at all this season.

As for the line, I’ll give you a little. But Carpenter’s been awful. The offensive line has been playing SINCE we lost a couple of those guys.

by djafrot on Dec 18, 2011 7:17 PM PST up reply actions  

No.

I’m saying that the Bears can complain that they don’t have Cutler, and that we never had a Cutler to complain about losing.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 18, 2011 7:29 PM PST up reply actions  

They're starting a back up guard at left tackle and a third stringer at right guard.

That’s huge. And the running game got going against the Cowboys and Ravens, when they had all of their starters.

by Nate Dogg on Dec 18, 2011 7:30 PM PST up reply actions  

That was a scary hit

I only saw a glimpse of the replay sneeking a look from behind my hands.
Loose ball,most dangerous situation in sports.

by vertigoman on Dec 18, 2011 5:40 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Such a shame

Hopefully he will be able to continue his NFL career: never want to see a player go down like that (except Trent Cole)

"Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly, the ill deeds along with the good and let me be judged accordingly. The rest is silence." ~ Dinobot

by beastwarking on Dec 19, 2011 1:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Ok, maybe not Trent Cole. An injury like tha is pretty sick so I don't think I would wish upon someone

Still, Cole can go eat a moldy old dick

"Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly, the ill deeds along with the good and let me be judged accordingly. The rest is silence." ~ Dinobot

by beastwarking on Dec 19, 2011 1:18 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Damn Raiders.

Clearly, they still have it in for us.

by vertigoman on Dec 18, 2011 5:37 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Only 2 #6 seeds have won a Super Bowl

Collinsworth calls it “a lot”.

Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters

by SSreporters on Dec 18, 2011 6:12 PM PST reply actions  

Dude, in his world, five is too many

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 18, 2011 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

And I posted in the wrong thread, too!

I’ve done that a lot today.

Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters

by SSreporters on Dec 18, 2011 6:13 PM PST up reply actions  

It's all one bit thread.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

*big

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Re-watching highlights

This has probably been mentioned but we got a big of a gift with the first touchdown. The Corey Graham leverage call on the field goal try just looked to me like a great play.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:50 PM PST reply actions  

That was not intentional, but:

*bit.

The circle is now complete.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 6:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Watch it again, watch his right arm, its stiff and in the back of his teammate,

He is clearly using it for leverage. You can not use a teammate at all to get extra air, even an inch. nor can you use it to keep yourself elevated longer in the attempt to block the ball, that he clearly did. It was a good call. Most field goal defenders are made well aware about it.
If he had used leverage to get over the pile and reestablished himself as self supporting it wouldnt have been called.

by Oliudyen on Dec 19, 2011 12:55 AM PST up reply actions  

You can't climb the back of the DL and then launch yourself.

That play was waaaaaay illegal.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 18, 2011 7:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Nor even launch yourself under your own power and land on his back

That’s still an advantage because it keeps the defender up high for a longer time.

by Jason_D on Dec 18, 2011 7:08 PM PST up reply actions  

You're responsible for where you land?

Ok, I didn’t know that. Good call then.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I didn't see any launching at all

He stabilized with his hands but he jumped off the ground, only.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 18, 2011 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

....

How do you know he didn’t push off? To me it looked like he did. It’s one of those situations where maybe he didn’t necessarily commit a penalty but if it looks like he did it’s got to be called. Not like it mattered 34-14 looks good to me too.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Dec 18, 2011 10:01 PM PST up reply actions  

38-14 is even better! :)

From this clip, play at 0:40, it’s pretty clear to me that he didn’t launch. But he definitely “crowd surfed” which Jacson has explained to me is also disallowed under the rules.

http://www.seahawks.com/videos-photos/videos/Seahawks-vs-Bears-Highlights/55a631d9-b2f2-4597-a871-2528d73d38a9

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 19, 2011 12:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Point is that you can't put your hand on the back of a teammate and then jump

That was the rule violation by definition.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 19, 2011 1:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow. What a great feeling.

"You are the molders of their dreams." - Clark Mollenhoff

by EequalsMc2 on Dec 18, 2011 7:42 PM PST reply actions  

I'm all in with the skittles

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 18, 2011 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

great post

Red commands a double team on nearly every run play and still holds the line of scrimmage nearly every time. Not much of a pass rusher but he has better hands then nearly every cornerback besides Trufant since 2006.

I don’t see the Niners keeping pace at all. Worst red zone offense in the league, Smith has been neutered to the point of Captain Checkdown, and Gore isn’t getting any younger. Defense is also peaking at the exact right time and playing out of their minds right now.

Schneider and Carroll have built a hell of a defense from nothing but the draft and trades, very impressive. The backup DBs of Sherman and Browner have made more pass breakups and INTs in the last month then I ever remember the last 4 years of Babs and Jennings every attempting. Very encouraging to see contributions at one of the most important positions on the field.

by Hancock.Brett on Dec 18, 2011 8:44 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Red isn't signed past this year???

I haven’t looked into it but if he’s not that needs to be priority #1 in FA.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Dec 18, 2011 10:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes.

I’m confident we will bring both back without having to sweat. But yes Red is more important than Lynch. Really good D-Linemen in their prime are much harder to find than a really good running back.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Dec 19, 2011 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Playoffs?!?!?!

Seahawks must win two and either

  • Lions lose to Chargers & Packers
  • Falcons lose to Saints & Bucs AND either
    • Giants beat Eagles & Cowboys AND Cowboys beat Eagles
    • Bears win two over Packers & Vikings

Makes our rooting next week easy:

  • Early Xmas Eve – Go Giants over Jets
  • Late Xmas Eve – Go SEAHAWKS, Cowboys & Chargers
  • Merry Christmas reading about Seahawks win and rooting on the Bears over Packers.
  • Monday night, assuming Bears won or Cowbys & Giants won, we can root for the Saints over Falcons

Then, on New Year’s Day, we can nurse our hangovers and let the early games determine if our game against the Cardinals matters.

  • Packers over Lions
  • Bucs over Falcons & Giants over Dallas or Bears over Vikings

All to setup a New Years battle with Arizona for a playoff spot (possibly even the 5th seed!) – piece of cake!

by Mariner Optimist on Dec 18, 2011 8:49 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Good explanation

That Raiders defensive collapse this evening was disheartening.

by fiftyone on Dec 18, 2011 9:08 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Raiders losing, Packers losing was a double whammy

Even if the Chargers upset the Lions next week, the Packers will lay down for them in the final week.

by Nshima on Dec 18, 2011 9:40 PM PST up reply actions  

No Kidding

Only Oakland would screw the Seahawks even by losing. Im not so sure the pack lays down though. Two division games with playoff implications, I dont think the pack will forget how they got into the playoffs last year.

by seachicken101 on Dec 18, 2011 9:49 PM PST up reply actions  

They may not lay down.

They were in the same spot a year ago and the Bears let them in without a fight and it came back to bite them.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Dec 18, 2011 10:03 PM PST up reply actions  

its kind of funny that even when we win

there’s still a ton of people complaining and whining.

by genax on Dec 18, 2011 11:28 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

potential hawks in the Pro-Bowl?

I’d say Lynch, Browner, and Kam are in. Big Red may not but SHOULD be in.
what say you?

by Hawkbound1123 on Dec 19, 2011 12:02 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies