The Impressive Play of the Seattle Seahawks Wide Receivers
The Seahawks' depth at wide receiver has been something to behold this season. Part of this, specifically the incredible performance by Doug Baldwin, can only be attributed to "luck". But it would be a mistake to miss the fact that the front office properly identified the high value of the WR position (unlike me, before this season), and they invested heavily in depth: extending both Ben Obomanu and Mike Williams, signing Sidney Rice and drafting Golden Tate and Kris Durham. The two UDFAs, Doug Baldwin and Ricardo Lockette, are additional if smaller investments. That's a lot to put into one group at this stage of the rebuild, but it's proven to be both totally worth it, with very impressive results.
Our depth has been a bit of a topic of discussion, following my patented Debby Downer writeup, specifically on how impressive it's been, reminiscent of the 2010 Buccaneers. When you go from it group to group, our depth has not been challenged with our safeties (good thing too, because I feel the entire defense falls or stands with Earl Thomas and - to a slightly lesser extent - Kam Chancellor), and not been challenged extensively for the defensive line, quarterback or running back positions. We lost Alan Branch for one game and it looked ugly, so you could consider that a test and a fail, but that would be too short-hand for me. The same is true for missing Marshawn Lynch one game, it's too little to draw conclusions on. In the preseason I thought the quarterback depth looked ok, and Charlie Whitehurst held up to close out the end of the Giants game, but then bombed hard against the Browns.
The offensive line depth is being tested and is not holding up well, though Lemuel Jeanpierre might be a find. Linebacker depth has been tested at the nickelbacker position, which has mostly just been causing our starting linebackers to play too many snaps. The two groups that have been tested and held up really well are cornerback and wide receiver. Cornerback saw the loss of a veteran have surprisingly little impact with the ascendance of a rookie, and the blow of losing Walter Thurmond has mostly been caught by the return of Roy Lewis from PUP.
As impressive as Richard Sherman, K.J. Wright et al have been, I've been even more impressed by the wide receiver group, and the way young guys are stepping up. Sidney Rice and Mike Williams were our starters to begin the season. Rice, in my opinion, has looked every bit the franchise wide receiver we were hoping he'd be, though we have plenty to worry about health-wise. Williams is struggling but that is more a reflection on his situation than any changes to his skillset. Over the season, they are 2nd and 5th in receiving yardage for this team, interspersing Doug Baldwin, Golden Tate and Ben Obomanu.
Tate and Baldwin have been alternating being leading receiver over the past four weeks, and over those four weeks Baldwin's put up 14 catches for 187 yards and a touchdown, Tate has put up 12 receptions for 162 yards and two touchdowns, and Obomanu rounds it up with 7 catches for 110 yards. That's nicely spread, and while the numbers don't immediately wow, they do when you realize the passing game has been subdued as a whole, yet is producing key first downs at the right moments. Not to mention this group is made up of an UDFA, a sophomore noted for his rawness coming out of college, and a 7th round pick.
I've heard no word on it, but I'd expect Tate and Obomanu to start with Baldwin free to continue his shifty ways out of the slot. He's a machine, but I don't know if starting him out of the flanker or split spot would be maximizing his value, while Obomanu's skillset (his game being mostly about creating separation) matches up really well with Tarvaris' skillset. Tate (admittedly a personal favorite of mine, for which I did catch some flak this offseason) is still a ways off from his potential, but considering his upside (not saying he'll reach it, but the potential is there) is Carolina's Steve Smith, he's been playing damn well, and playing such a large amount of snaps is huge for his development.
Rounding up the group are Deon Butler, Kris Durham and Ricardo Lockette. I'm not a huge fan of Butler's (for reasons described here) and he hasn't impressed so far this year, but considering his injury situation that's hardly surprising, and he's tallying more snaps and targets as the year progresses, so we'll see where it goes. Durham and Lockette are essentially unknowns. Overall, though, when measuring potential, this group matches up with any in the NFL, in my opinion, though whether such potential will be fulfilled to an adequate amount is always hard to say, especially when they don't have a high-end quarterback throwing to them.
A few highlights from the Bears game after the break...
3-9-SEA 21 (1:38) (Shotgun) T.Jackson pass short right to D.Baldwin to SEA 34 for 13 yards (B.Urlacher).Following a 1-yard run by Lynch and a throw-away by Jackson, Seahawks go into shotgun, Mike Williams, Golden Tate and Doug Baldwin as the WRs, Zach Miller inline next to the RT, and Justin Forsett in the backfield. The Bears are playing with large cushions, playing to cover the short passing game. The Bears line up strong safety Craig Steltz on Doug Baldwin by he backpedals deep, handing over the man assignment to cornerback DJ Moore who was originally lined up next to the LDE and threatening blitz. Baldwin correctly feels the soft spot is thus to the outside, and he steps back exactly at the pylon as Moore is trying to read Tarvaris' eyes. The definition of how a slot receiver is supposed to play.
Note Mike Williams is still halfway through his route in that photo, on the outside. Williams really does look excruciatingly slow coming out of his breaks, as discussed before. He looks like he's playing in slow motion next to Doug.
2-23-SEA 21 (15:00) (Shotgun) T.Jackson pass short middle to G.Tate to SEA 35 for 14 yards (C.Davis).
Seahawks are backed up by back-to-back penalties (holding on Lemuel Jeanpirre and a false start on Breno Giacomini). An obvious passing down, they line up four-wide (Mike Williams, Golden Tate, Doug Baldwin, Ben Obomanu) with Forsett in the backfield. The Bears respond with four people in man on our receivers and Urlacher as the single linebacker. Everyone releases into fairly short route, and at about the five yard mark they're all looking back for the pass.
This is a quick play design meant to beat the rush. Tarvaris has time enough as DE Chauncey Davis stumbles after clearly beating Paul McQuistan, while DT Anthony Adams slows himself down by a slow-developing stunt outside. Forsett also releases as a dumpoff option. Tarvaris never takes his eyes off Tate, who is slanting into the middle of the field.
Lance Briggs is in man coverage on Tate as he catches the ball between Briggs and Urlacher. Tate tweeted after the game that Marshawn Lynch noted a similiarity between the two of them when the ball is in his hands. This Baby Beast Mode was in full display this game. Tate steps inside to make Briggs miss, sidesteps an Urlacher tackle and is only stopped because Chauncey Davis makes an impressive play catching up from the defensive end position after this sidestepping slowed down Tate. Still makes up an extra five yards on the catch, which is something we can expect from Tate with great regularity.
3-8-SEA 20 (7:05) (Shotgun) T.Jackson pass incomplete deep right to G.Tate.
I actually really liked this playcall. It's 3rd and 8, tied ballgame. Seahawks line up Mike Williams to the left, with Golden Tate and Doug Baldwin on the right. TE Miller and RB Forsett both look to chip and release, so there are short dumpoff options if needed. Presnap, Tarvaris signals Baldwin, who then motions out of the flanker spot into a slot position, Bears CBs Tim Jennings and DJ Moore swap assignments so Jennings stays on the flanker (now Tate) and Moore on the slot (now Baldwin). The protection is good, and Tate shows a great amount of speed here, getting to the 50 in a heartbeat. The coverage by Tim Jennings is tight, and the ball is ever-so-slightly off, but otherwise it's a good play.
2-10-SEA 32 (:57) T.Jackson pass incomplete short middle to D.Baldwin [J.Peppers].
Sixth straight incompletion from Jackson to close out a weak first quarter. Bears rush five, sending Lance Briggs along with the defensive line. Gallery and Unger double up on DT Adams so Briggs is essentially coming in unblocked. Forsett throws a nice low block on Briggs which slows him down enough to prevent the sack, but Peppers is coming in more or less free after swiping away McQuistan's block with one arm and speeding around him.
The rather bizarre call from the refs is that it's not intentional grounding because a receiver was "several yards" within the area, "after discussion". This was clear-cut intentional grounding, Baldwin wasn't within five yards of the ball. Tarvaris didn't have much of a different choice so it was the right play to make, but he never had time to set his feet to be able or look to even throw close to a receiver. I wish the intentional grounding rule was either reworked or applied with better consistency. Refs just seem loath to call it even though it happens quite a lot.
3-9-SEA 21 (14:14) (Shotgun) T.Jackson pass short middle to G.Tate to CHI 46 for 33 yards (D.Moore).
The opening drive of the 3rd quarter accounted for 77 of Tarvaris' 227 total passing yards, but it did not start well, with a dumpoff from a fleeing Zach Miller for 1 yard, and a drop by Cameron Morrah that would not have gone for much more than 0 yards anyway. Tim Ryan is settling down into a comfortable narrative about the Bears defense being "in the heads" of the Seahawks offense, and then this play happens.
Bears are threatening blitz. Seahawks line up Zach Miller on the line and Forsett in the backfield. Seahawks line up Ben Obomanu and Doug Baldwin on the left, Golden Tate on the right. Bears rush Briggs on a delay, but he is picked up very well LG Robert Gallery. Unger is close to being beat but ends up getting enough of his guy (DT Matt Toeaina) to keep him off Tarvaris, though definitely breathing down the quarterback's neck. Forsett pulls out left, drawing in Urlacher. Miller releases for a quick dig, pulling in free safety Craig Steltz, and would have been an option for a likely first down. Obomanu and Tate slant towards the middle, while Baldwin runs a go route deep.
Tarvaris stays calm, reads the field to his right and zips a throw to Tate at the Seahawks 35. Tim Jennings jumps on Tate's back, while Charles Tillman leaves Obomanu to join in on the tackle and Brandon Meriweather comes in from a deep cover position.
Three guys, that's a tackle right? Well, it takes a bit of luck with Tillman knocking Jennings off Tate's back, but credit Tate for staying up, spinning away from Meriweather and escaping. DJ Moore released from Baldwin's coverage to save the Bears from a touchdown (it's a shame Baldwin doesn't engage for a block, but his positioning wasn't ideal due to his route, and it's understandable). The play ends twenty yards ahead of where the catch is made, at the Chicago 45.
1-10-CHI 46 (13:35) T.Jackson pass deep right to B.Obomanu pushed ob at CHI 3 for 43 yards (T.Jennings)
So much for "in the heads". Seahawks line up two running backs and a tight end, with Obomanu and Tate wide, and Zach Miller motioning from right to left. Bears call a timeout right before the snap (to bring in Charles Tillman, ostensibly), and the Seahawks come back with exactly the same formation and Miller motioning, though Tate is taken out of the lineup. Miller releases for a short route, while both reivers run deep sideline routes. The running backs both stay in to block, which buys Tarvaris enough time. The Bears read run, which means Craig Steltz is in the box. Brandon Meriweather is left in single high.
Obomanu straight up runs by Tim Jennings, who fails to jam him at all. Meriweather arrives way too late to be any help, and Jennings barely manages to get Obomanu out of bounds. Again, really good throw by Tarvaris. Setting up the pass with the run, even if the run isn't producing all that much.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice post.
Who has more superstar potential — Baldwin or Tate? I’d like to see one of them turn into Steve Smith (who continues to impress me and is coming close to HOF credentials).
It will be mighty interesting if Lockette turns out to be good too.
Tate
Tate has Steve Smith potential, but I think you always have to be careful saying something like that. Comparing players isn’t the same as equating players. Tate could turn out like Steve Smith, but that’s an “if-everything-goes-right” scenario, with his development as a player and of the team around him. I don’t consider it a likely case scenario.
I love Baldwin’s play, but I have a hard time reconciling him with any form of number one or superstar potential. I think he’s more likely to be Bobby Engram-ish, which isn’t any form of criticism. This is the modern, passing NFL. Your slot receiver (and, consequently, your nickel corner) almost need to be starting-level players for your offense to reach any high plateau. I personally just consider slot and nickel guys to be de facto half-starters, because a ton of teams spend 1/3rd-1/2nd of their snaps in such formations. And Baldwin is good. REALLY good. I don’t want to fall into an obvious trap of overselling a rookie because sophomore slumps and following career declines are all too real (the Bucs provide some good examples in Mike Williams and earlier with Michael Clayton (who was REALLY good as a rookie and has done zilch since), so it’s not like Baldwin is true proving himself. But there’s no real reason except “slumps happen” to assume he’s anything but a long-term, high-level slot starter.
So: Tate’s upside is probably higher, but Baldwin’s downside is definitely lower.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 21, 2011 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
He doesn't have the white man hustle nor speed
Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters
by SSreporters on Dec 21, 2011 11:13 AM PST up reply actions
I was very impressed with that Baldwin play as well
As soon as Moore turns to look at the QB, Baldwin recognizes the space Moore is vacating – he’s drifting toward the center of the field where Baldwin was running to at last look. It only takes about one-and-a-half steps from the DB, and Baldwin is suddenly wide open where a second before I’d have called him covered. Great read by TJack to get the ball there so quickly.
The WR I was most impressed with in Chicago was Obomanu. The way he was absolutely torching the Bears DBs deep was a revelation. He has a whole different gear he uses to zip by defenders.
not sure why we are choosing engram as a comparison for baldwin.
baldwin seems to have much more awareness after the ball in his hands, and an elusiveness that is surprising. I think it’s fair to say he gets open and is reliable with hands like engram, but after the catch, I see a little welker, santonio holmes, santana moss. elusive in the open field, not faster than all the other players but able to make strong evasive cuts without losing speed – a huge advantage if you have one blocker and three guys to beat.
I like the tate/steve smith comparison, but maybe based on size, i think percy harvin is a better comparison. Fast, physical receiver with running back style in the open field. Harvin took 3 years to develop into the player he is now – i expect Tate to have a similar explosion next year – he has something to prove. I could see tate taking handoffs and pitches in the backfield and even throwing the ball in some wildcat situations. Not sure if he has the skills, but he has the talent.
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
I like that Baldwin doesn't fit into any immediately obvious archetypes, honestly.
Makes his explosive plays even more eye-catching.
Yeah, Tate/Harvin is a good comparison too
They all share a certain WR/RB hybridness to them.
As for Baldwin, I just took Engram as the closest thing in the most important fields for him (separation, short-area quickness, hands). Yes, he creates more YAC than Engram, that’s a very fair point, but I don’t think he’s close to Holmes or Welker either. Still, well…he’s good.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 21, 2011 5:31 PM PST up reply actions
Thanks. Is that last line correct?
Are you saying that Tate’s upside and downside are higher than Baldwin’s? Or did you mean to say that Baldwin’s downside is higher?
By "lower downside", I mean "less downside"
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 21, 2011 10:36 AM PST up reply actions
Tate's tackle-breaking is a joy and scare to watch
Because he invokes memories of Burleson every time he does some spin move or tries to get that extra yard.
I’m slowly warming up to him now.
Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters
I never really knew what to think of Burleson
Do or do not, there is no try-Yoda
by ironheart777 on Dec 21, 2011 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
The OL depth is not "holding up"?
I think that is demonstrably wrong. The Bears sold out defending the run, so Lynch had little room most of the time. But the Bears paid for that. McQuistan did a very credible job against Peppers.
And that’s not counting the Rams game at all, even though they have a pretty decent DL against the run.
Here's a counter-argument

Bears stacked the box a lot because they did not fear Tarvaris and he only really made them pay in one drive. They could generally get at him with front four pressure. He ended well following halftime, but that does not negate that he had a bad first half. Throwing six incompletions in a row is bad, and pressure was a huge part of this. They scored a defensive touchdown on pressure (though that one primarily on Tarvaris), and hit or flushed him out of the pocket several times.
Also, the Rams are a bottom defense against the run, 25h by DVOA. They have been atrocious all year. They are a good pass-rushing defense, and they hit Tarvaris Jackson all day.
The offensive line could overcome Moffitt and Carpenter because they were not that good at that point. It is visibly struggling with having lost Okung, in both pass and run blocking. It could be worse, for sure, and it’s totally understandable, because Okung is our best offensive player if not best player overall so of course you’d expect a dropoff, but there’s no reason to deny it is making our team significantly worse.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 21, 2011 11:38 AM PST up reply actions
To explain further
a) this is all relative. I am not massively disappointed by our offensive line depth, but I don’t think it compares to what our cornerback and wide receiver depth has shown. Part of this lies in the fact that OLine depth is never similarly plug and play, but part of it also lies in quality.
b) Tarvaris Jackson was 4-12 for 51 yards with a fumble lost for a touchdown, in the first half. Caleb Hanie was outperforming him. Now Pete Carroll can keep denying we have schematic halftime adjustments until his face turns blue, and we “just go back to basics” at halftime, but that’s not true. Our coaching staff’s halftime adjustments are awesome, and completely responsible for that big drive to start the 2nd half, which was also the offense’s ONLY long drive (they scored a FG starting from the Seahawks 46 and a TD from the Chicago 29). The offense was beaten into submission the entire first half, both passing and running, and was efficient the second half due to outscheming flaws in the Bears’ defensive approach.
Compare this to the offense’s performance against the Ravens (though that was exceptionally good) or even the Eagles, who are a (borderline) top 10 defense. Realize that – as per our own formation nation – Forsett is playing a lot more snaps, and the coaches clearly see him as a blocking specialist as most of the time he relieves pressure either by doing so or by functioning as an outlet pass. Realize we’re using a lot more blocking and chipping tight end looks and can no longer shift the focus of the offensive line like we could. Yes. All in all, I would say that’s a significant drop-off.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 21, 2011 12:05 PM PST up reply actions
It IS relative
…and relative to how other teams would do losing 3 fifths of their starting OLs, I’d say we are doing pretty darn well. The issue is expectations—you don’t expect anything OTHER than a “significant drop-off” when you lose 60 percent of your starting OL. But depth can “hold up” just fine with such a drop off, if it is not catastrophic. Frankly, I was expecting a disaster—these dudes are cast-offs by any measure. But it has not been.
And, in fact, even relative to how we were doing at the start of the season WITH with our first string OL, I am pleasantly surprised, and I doubt that I am alone. You are certainly right that the WR and CB depth has been truly impressive, but the OL depth could have been far, far worse than it has been.
The SF game will be a serious test in any event for that OL, that is for sure.
Right, I think you're slightly misreading my statement
I’m not panicking or deriding the depth, I just think it’s mixed-to-mediocre, and if you want to make the argument “our FO is really good at gathering depth”, just realize that unlike WR or CB, OL is still a work in progress.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 22, 2011 1:19 PM PST up reply actions
I was happy to get to hear Ricardo Lockett on the radio yesterday.
I thought he sounded a lot like Obomanu. Same tone of voice & all but just a nice bright kid happy to get a chance. High hopes for that man.
Durham is on IR
He’s been out for sevreal weeks otherwise he’d be starting.
I know, that's why he's a blank
Saying “otherwise he’s starting” is an assumption with no basis in reality.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Dec 22, 2011 1:18 PM PST up reply actions

by 




































