Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

NFL DraftWatch - Week 16: The Season Finale

131571271_extra_large_medium

In the span of about 72 hours, the Seahawks prospects for both the playoffs and the draft turned really crappy.

It all started on Thursday afternoon, when Matt Barkley announced that he would remain with USC for one more year. Living in the Los Angeles area, the sports broadcasters were practically dancing in the streets at the news, since it represented a genuine shot at a BCS championship next year, but it bummed me out as a Seahawks fan. Not necessarily because we expected Matt to fall to us in the draft - I think we all figured he was a top-5 pick already - but because that's one less QB for all the other teams to pick from. The top tier of eligible quarterbacks now consists of only two names: Andrew Luck, and Robert Griffin III. Others may have their favorites - and I'm sure we'll be bringing them up in the thread here - but clearly there's a big dropoff between those two players and whoever else is mentioned.

That night, the Colts won their second game of the season against the locked-in Texans. (Locked-in meaning they're in the playoffs but can't improve their seeding any.) That, combined with the Rams losing against the Steelers on Sunday, and the Vikings defeating the Redskins, means that the two teams are now tied with two wins apiece.

Although the Colts still lead by a country mile in terms of strength of schedule (the Rams actually ended up with the toughest schedule in the league), that can very easily change next week: the Colts have what now looks to be a very winnable game at Jacksonville on Sunday while the Rams host the 49ers - who are still gunning for a first-round bye. If both teams have the same result next week, the Colts will have officially choked away the #1 pick in the draft to the Rams in almost Red Sox-esque fashion. Not to say the Rams would forsake Sam Bradford and draft Luck if they had the top pick - they may end up taking someone like Matt Kalil or someone else to plug one of their many holes - but the possibility would be there, and it's not pleasant.

And then, of course, our playoff fate was sealed in Detroit when the Lions trounced San Diego, clinching their first playoff berth since 1999 while simultaneously all but shutting the Seahawks out of the picture. The loss against San Francisco made it official, and the draft has now become the consolation prize.

Let's take a quick look at the draft standings now before we get into the nuts-and-bolts talk regarding Week 17:

Star-divide

1. Colts (2-13, 128-112 SOS)

2. Rams (2-13, 141-99 SOS)

3. Vikings (3-12, 134-106 SOS)

4. Jaguars (4-11, 121-119 SOS)

5. Browns (4-11, 127-113 SOS)

6. Buccaneers (4-11, 132-108 SOS)

7. Redskins (5-10, 114-126 SOS)

8. Dolphins (5-10, 123-117 SOS)

9. Panthers (6-9, 120-120 SOS)

10. Bills (6-9, 124-116 SOS, 1-4 Div.)

11. Chiefs (6-9, 124-116 SOS, 2-3 Div.)

12. Cardinals (7-8, 114-126 SOS)

13. Eagles (7-8, 117-123 SOS)

**14. Seahawks (7-8, 121-119 SOS)**

15. Chargers (7-8, 124-116 SOS)

16. Bears (7-8, 128-112 SOS)

17. Titans (8-7, 112-128 SOS)

18. Cowboys (8-7, 113-127 SOS)

19. Jets (8-7, 118-122 SOS)

20. Bengals from Raiders (8-7, 121-119 SOS)

21. Broncos (8-7, 124-116 SOS)

22. Giants (8-7, 125-115 SOS)

23. Bengals (9-6, 116-124 SOS)

TEAMS THAT HAVE CLINCHED:

Falcons (9-6; traded to Cleveland)
Lions (10-5)
Texans (10-5)
Ravens (11-4)
Steelers (11-4)
Saints (12-3; traded to New England)
49ers (12-3)
Patriots (12-3)
Packers (14-1)

(Strength of Schedule is the combined win-loss record of every opponent the team has played thus far. Divisional opponents are counted twice since they appear on the schedule twice. If SOS is tied, divisional record serves as the tiebreaker. Teams that clinch a playoff spot draft in order of their postseason finish.)

I went this whole season not realizing that a few teams had traded away their first-round picks (most notably the Raiders for Carson Palmer); the standings now reflect the actual recipient of each pick.

Now for the ramifications of next week. Since every game of the final week of the regular season is a divisional game, every team will automatically add 6 wins and 6 losses to their final SOS: 4 wins and 4 losses will come from the two divisions that each team faces, while 2 wins and 2 losses will come from the two divisional foes who are playing each other and not the team in question. (For example, the SF-STL game will account for 2 wins and 2 losses for both us and the Cards.) That leaves just four games of wiggle room for each team: the two conference opponents of the same standing from last year, and two games from the team's opponent that week. (Remember, divisional rivals count double for SOS.) All of this assumes there are no ties, but unless it's one of those two teams of the same standing, it'll balance out anyways.

Confused yet?

Here's the takeaway as far as the Seahawks are concerned: depending on who wins in our game against Arizona, and whether or not Atlanta (vs. TB) and Chicago (@ MIN) win their games, the Seahawks will finish with a SOS no worse than 127-129 and no better than 131-125.

On that note, here's a brief look at the best- and worst-case scenarios regarding the draft next week. (Note: this is purely from a draft-order perspective. Obviously we all want the 'Hawks to win next week even if it hurts our draft position.)

BEST CASE: Seahawks draft 10th
-
ARI beats SEA
- PHI beats WAS
- SD beats OAK
- MIN beats CHI
- BUF beats NE
- KC beats DEN
- TEN beats HOU
- NYJ beats MIA
- CIN beats BAL
- TB beats ATL
- DAL beats NYG

WORST CASE: Seahawks draft 19th
-
SEA beats ARI
- NE beats BUF
- DEN beats KC
- WAS beats PHI
- OAK beats SD
- NYG beats DAL
- HOU beats TEN
- MIA beats NYJ
- ATL beats TB
- GB beats DET
- CIN beats BAL
- iND beats JAC
- CHI beats MIN

Essentially, we're hoping that whatever the outcome of our game is, we don't end up in a big crowd of teams with the same record. Thanks to have the AFC North on our schedule and having all of the 49ers' wins count against us twice, we're not going to win many tiebreaks.

That'll pretty much do it for DraftWatch this year; next week, the final draft order will be set. I'm pleasantly surprised that this thing got such a great reception over the course of the season, even though these sort of discussions by their nature take a pessimistic look at the team's situation. I never like making promises too far ahead of time since circumstances can change at the drop of a hat, but thanks to everyone for their support and a big thanks to the admins here at Field Gulls to find this stuff worthy of front-page coverage. See you next time!

Comment 36 comments  |  13 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Did you actually work that last part out yourself? If so, bravo.

Seems like “Best Case” if you’re a Seahawks fan might be Seattle getting that 10th pick and then the Rams getting the top pick. If the Colts pick first, they will have more pressure to draft Luck than the Rams would. So the Colts might take Luck and then the Colts might be willing to deal with Seattle. It’s a big “if” but just spit-balling here. Assuming the Rams don’t want to trade in the division, and assuming the Colts wouldn’t trade the top pick, then they might be more willing to deal the 2nd pick and maybe Hawks have a shot at RG3, which I would love.

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Dec 27, 2011 8:08 AM PST reply actions  

Rec'd

For a great series of posts — I have looked forward to these every week. Thanks!

It was just intense, and it was ball, and it was juice. The juice level in that room was high, and it was awesome.

by mister bunny on Dec 27, 2011 9:02 AM PST reply actions  

I appreciate the compliments.

On a related note – how hard is it to change one’s handle on this site? I think I’ve gotten to the point where I’m willing to put my actual name on this stuff.

Call me sentimental but I want to go back
And commemorate the place with a historical plaque

by Hmph on Dec 27, 2011 10:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Ask Danny and ye shall recieve.

I think.

Sooner or later there will be an elite club of FG’s who use real names.

Don't be an idiot. If an idiot would do that, then don't do it. Muahahahaaha back on twitter

by RagingAlot on Dec 27, 2011 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Real names are where it's at man.

Makes for a nice strong incentive to be civil. Anonymity is conducive to jackassery.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Dec 30, 2011 12:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

You may not believe me but STUFR is more my real name then my given name. I have friends that couldn’t tell you my given name without a lot of thought

they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!

by stufr on Dec 31, 2011 11:25 AM PST via Android app up reply actions  

Also recced because I really enjoy these and appreciate your hard work

It’s been nice to keep tabs on our draft status, even after the “Suck for Luck” campaign fizzled.

by HititHere on Dec 27, 2011 10:37 AM PST reply actions  

Why is everybody so sure the Rams wouldn't drop Bradford?

It’d be cheaper in the long-term, for one.

by bewrong on Dec 27, 2011 1:57 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Are you sure about this?

Only a little bit of digging shows that Bradford is owed $25 million over the next four years. Yes, he signed a $78 million contract with $50 million in bonuses, but he’s already been paid most of that. His base salary sits between 1.2 and 3.6 for the next four years and his bonus is 3.8 per year. Cam Newton received a 4 year, $22 million (all guaranteed) contract in the first year of the new CBA. Therefore, considering that Bradford is not all guaranteed, he’s cheaper and less of a risk. They can’t take back what they already paid him.

The Rams best move would probably be to take a bounty for the top pick rather than for Bradford, because Andrew Luck should bring a lot more back in return.

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Dec 27, 2011 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

On the same logic

The Rams should be able to get more for Bradford in trade than they would for Luck. (Depending, of course, on how that contract is structured.) Bradford’s lower-risk and owed less money than the likely first pick. Contract value is contract value.

by robbbbbb on Dec 28, 2011 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

I can't buy this.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 28, 2011 11:36 AM PST up reply actions  

They'd be lucky to get a first back for Bradford.

Because there is serious doubt about him after this season.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Dec 28, 2011 3:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Not to mention...

The Rams NEED the bounty of picks that #1 could command. Not sure what the Walrus would do, but the Browns could offer 2 first rounders this year, plus whatever else in the future. A top tier WR and O-lineman in the first round might make Bradford look a little more competent next year.

by Chooch82 on Dec 27, 2011 4:10 PM PST reply actions  

The biggest problem the seahawks will have at draft time 2013

Is…. Who the he’ll do we take with the 32nd overall pick? And after we win the superbowl against the Green bay Packers (yeah, that’s right, two NFC teams in the superbowl cause the afc sucks) do we really give a shit about the draft?

Watching the Seahawks is like peeing on yourself, everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling it brings

by DKrottenhawk on Dec 27, 2011 6:41 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Yeah, we'll have needs as some key pieces age and retire.

I mean, how else are we going to be the first team in NFL history to 3-peat as Super Bowl champs?

Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence lies in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
-Sun Tzu-

by chin64 on Dec 28, 2011 8:58 PM PST up reply actions  

*10-peat

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Dec 28, 2011 10:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Peat, drink and be merry

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Dec 30, 2011 1:36 AM PST up reply actions  

What effect will beating Arizona have?

It would be good to know the consolation of losing. So if we win, would it be like we’ll get 16-19 and if we lose 10-15 or something.??

by Hawk088 on Dec 27, 2011 7:51 PM PST reply actions  

If the Seahawks win, the absolute best spot they could draft is 14th, where we are now.

There are 11 teams currently at 6-9 or worse. We’d have no shot to catch any of them. Add the Cardinals and the Eagles (who are four games in front of our SOS, and we’d only be able to make up two), and that makes at least 13 teams that would have a worse record than us if we get to 8-8. On top of that, the Chargers, Bears, Titans, Cowboys, and Jets would all have to win their respective games, since we’d be slotted behind any of these teams if they lose on account of either a weaker record or a weaker SOS.

Keep in mind – there are a lot more 8-7 teams right now than there are 6-9 teams. Winning against Arizona would necessarily put us in the larger group, and as mentioned before our schedule is too strong to break many ties – not to mention our 4-2 record would be better than any opponent who happened to tie our SOS.

Call me sentimental but I want to go back
And commemorate the place with a historical plaque

by Hmph on Dec 27, 2011 10:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Is there a scenario where the 'Hawks can pick 19th?

NFL Forecaster says there’s a low probability (~2%) that the Seahawks pick 19th, and not 18th.

That said, if the Seahawks lose they pick somewhere between 10 and 13 (most likely 12). If they win, somewhere between 14 and 19 (most likely 17; 14 is really unlikely.)

by robbbbbb on Dec 28, 2011 9:45 AM PST reply actions  

That program raped my Java into unconsciousness

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 28, 2011 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I've never had a problem with it

And I’ve been using it since about week five, on both my home and work machines. Huh.

by robbbbbb on Dec 28, 2011 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Not gonna do all the math again, but it looks like it's plausible.

If Seattle wins, then SD, CHI, TEN, DAL, and NYJ all lose, we’d be behind all five of them.

Call me sentimental but I want to go back
And commemorate the place with a historical plaque

by Hmph on Dec 29, 2011 12:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies