OT: Matt Hasselbeck
This post isn't to talk hypothetical about Hasselbeck in Seattle, it's a look at his performances in Tennessee and why I hope he retires.
According to The506 maps, Seattle has been spared the disaster of watching Sanchize intercept and fumble his way out of New York, and we instead will get the Titans @ Texans, presumably because of the QBs on Tennessee's roster. If the Titans win and the Bengals lose to the Ravens, then Tennessee is in the playoffs and will rematch Houston next weekend. Any other result and they're eliminated.
Lost in all of the talk of Tarvaris Jackson, is how our ex-QB is performing in Tennessee. If we just want to look at the raw numbers, here they are:
Started 15 games, 297-483 (61.5%), 3274 yards, 16 TDs, 14 INTs, 80.5 QB rating, sacked 16 times.
That's right, Tennessee has one of the best offensive lines in football and Hasselbeck is on pace for the fewest sacks taken in his career. And yet, his numbers are essentially worse than his 2009 and 2010 seasons. He has lost Kenny Britt and Chris Johnson has been inconsistent, but the stats are still pretty bad for an NFL starting QB. His YPA is 6.8 yards, which has essentially made him Captain Checkdown yet again.
The same problems persist from the 2010 season. Solid start, and then a breakdown in play coinciding with injuries. In the Titans' loss to New Orleans, he suffered an achilles injury simply running towards the football trying to bat down a pass that was already deflected at the line of scrimmage. It invokes memories of him running for a touchdown against Tampa Bay last year and pulling his back. Even when he is finally given the luxury of a quality offensive line he still cannot maintain his own health.
After starting the season with 13 TDs and 6 INTs, he has now thrown just 2 TDs and 8 INTs in the last 8 games and was benched after being "that guy" to help give the Indianapolis Colts their first win of the season. Every time he has been forced to sit due to injury or for poor play, Jake Locker has come in and outperformed him. Locker has yet to throw an interception in 66 throws and nearly led comebacks against quality teams like Atlanta and New Orleans, and getting a touchdown throw against Indianapolis to close the gap within 7, before Donald Brown clinched the game with a TD run. Locker is averaging 16 yards per completion and 8 yards per attempt and also has a rushing touchdown. He's stretching the field and forcing the defense to respect mid-range and long throws, something Hasselbeck does not command anymore.
Matt Hasselbeck is 36 years old and playing like it. He was once on the cusp of elite in his prime and probably the greatest QB in Seahawks history. Hass has given us legendary moments on the field as recently as January 9th, 2011. But it appears that just like in Seattle, his time at Tennessee has already worn out its welcome and now he faces a Houston Texans team that bumrushed him in their first meeting en route to a blowout defeat. I don't expect the Texans to lose this game despite having nothing to play for beyond momentum.
I don't want to see Matt go out like this. Way back in January I was hoping that after the playoff defeat in Chicago he'd announce his retirement. Unfortunately he still believes (as most athletes normally do) that he can play for multiple seasons at a high-level, and so far in year 1 of his 3 year contract he's looking like a finished man. For all intents and purposes, as a Seahawks fan and a fan of Matt Hasselbeck, I hope he calls it quits if there is no postseason play to be had after Sunday. His body cannot handle a 16 game season without some freak injury, and his arm cannot make throws into tight coverage anymore.
There are two potential outcomes on Sunday - He has an effective enough game and leads the Titans towards a chance at the playoffs, or he plays like garbage against Houston for the 3rd time in 3 years and sees himself no longer in a guaranteed starting position in the NFL. I'm thinking it's the latter, and if so, I would like nothing better than for Hasselbeck to ask for his release, sign a one-day contract with the Seahawks, and announce his retirement from football. He's accomplished so much in his career and has achieved more than what was expected from him when he was Brett Favre's backup, it's time to hang them up, Matt. Don't damage your career any further and don't get yourself into even more injury problems that could present serious issues after your playing career is over.
I want to remember you as the guy who came along with Mike Holmgren and found himself as part of the revival of the Seahawks franchise all the way towards a Super Bowl and perennial NFC West champions, not the one whose last two seasons have resulted in calls for the backup guy. I'm sure other Seahawks fans think that, too.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Matt Hasselbeck?
And yet, his numbers are essentially worse than his 2009 and 2010 seasons
Over the year? Nope. 16 starts, more attempts, higher completion percentage, same YPA as 2010, better QB-INT ratio than past two years, significantly better TO-per-attempt.
Nice post, but personally I don’t really see Hasselbeck playing with the Titans as impacting his career memories with us at all. It would’ve been poetic for him to retire after last year, sure, but he didn’t, and once he went over to the Titans I stopped caring what he would do.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
His DVOA is also improved about 15% from 2011 to 2010 and 25% from 2011 to 2009.*
For perspective the difference between 2011 and 2010 Hass in DVOA is about the same as the difference between Aaron Rodgers and Tony Romo this year. The difference between 2011 and 2009 Hass is (roughly) the difference between Aaron Rodgers and Matt Ryan this year.
I think all things considered, Hasselbeck arrived and performed in Tennessee remarkably close to as advertised, and he has been playing at a higher level in Tennessee than his recent years in Seattle. I wish him the best and hopes he follows his own advice in believing “It’s not over until all 32 teams say no.” He’s a great guy.
*DVOA isn’t a bullet-proof stat. And since sacks are counted against a QB, the difference in offensive lines actually gives him a boost in his numbers not just in his ‘opportunity’ to be good.
by SgtSasquatch on Dec 30, 2011 6:54 PM PST up reply actions
It's easy for most fans to say we think a guy should retire.
But I’d keep playing until the checks stopped. I’d be like Mark Brunell in NY. 42 years old? Give me my god damned clipboard and my game check. I’ll hold on PAT’s all day long bitches.
And if I was Matt-Another season? 8 million dollars you say? Don’t mind if I do.
It’s not like these guys are really qualified to do anything else. They can play, coach, broadcast, or stay at home with the wife. And since I’ve heard Matt’s Infinty ads on the radio, I’d say broadcasting is out.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
Brunell...
…is still playing ‘cause he’s broken – victim of the shitty economy and I think he got hosed by Madoff.
Most of my cliches aren't original.
- Chuck Knox
If Matt makes some sort of postseason magic happen, I'll root for him.
If not, and he retires, I’ll hope he ends up broadcasting, or doing something for the Seahawks. I could be wrong over the course of an entire game, but I’d be expecting him to be way less boring and annoying than most of the “analysts” in the booth.
He definitely will be
as he’s actually likable and has personality.
Wanted: Franchise Quarterback
It's Great To Be a Florida Gator!
by Wayward Llama on Dec 31, 2011 8:58 AM PST up reply actions
I want him to win next week and feel no bitterness to him leaving.
You’re awesome, Matt. :)
by Benne on Dec 30, 2011 9:08 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
I could care less.
Wish him well, loved him in the mid 00’s, and most important— so very glad he’s gone.
Retiring and signing a one-day contract will mean more to someone else perhaps, but neither it nor his next game/remaining contract play/next 5 years make any difference to me. He’s number 8, and he’ll be in the Ring of Honor when he’s done playing, like he deserves to be.
"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992
by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 30, 2011 10:08 PM PST reply actions
You could care less?
Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters
by SSreporters on Dec 31, 2011 10:34 AM PST up reply actions
You mean you COULDN'T care less.
Learn JiuJitsu.
Semper Fi'
SUPREMEREEM just gave Brock Liverkickulitis
by RolloTomasi on Dec 31, 2011 11:15 AM PST up reply actions
No, I COULD care less.
If I couldn’t care less, I wouldn’t have typed anything.
"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992
by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 31, 2011 11:43 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Where the English language and science/logic diverge.
If you graph it out on a chart of how much you could possibly care over on the far right is “couldn’t care less” in the maximum don’t give a fuck corner.
While “could care less” can sit anywhere on the left of it all the way up to “almost care” leaving an unspecified amount of not caring that could be achieved in the future.
I say if you could care less, then what you could care less about hasn’t pissed you off enough yet.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
by hazbro24 on Dec 31, 2011 2:19 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Hah!
This is definitely one of my biggest “incorrect turns of phrase” and I get called out on it. So I came up with my witty response above, because I’m too lazy to remember to stop using it, yet I remember the comeback… go figure.
"Now I'm tired of this s---. I'm sick and f------ tired of an 8-10 record. I'm f------ tired of losing to Purdue. I'm not here to f--- around this week. Now you may be, but I'm not." -- Bobby Knight, circa 1992
by Tyler Jorgensen on Dec 31, 2011 3:04 PM PST up reply actions
Here's a good explanation from a famous British guy:
and I did find a graph:

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
by hazbro24 on Dec 31, 2011 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
REEM!!!!!
Easiest pick I’ll ever make.
Also loved it when Fitch got KTFO’d.
Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters
I hate it when I copy that out from you Americans
It’s not quite as bad as irregardless, but it’s pretty bad. They’re idiomatic anyway so we’re reaching a point where correcting “could care less” becomes incorrect, that’s just how language works (just as how ironic has been used wrong for 150 years so Alanis Morisette’s song lyrics are not actually incorrect).
That said, it is a very illogical bastardization. I avoid it whenever I can.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 1, 2012 4:26 AM PST up reply actions
Oh, you must be confused.
“Irregardless” is irradiated regard that is less one isotope. Derived from yellow cake.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
by hazbro24 on Jan 2, 2012 10:14 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
If you are a tenn fan how can you not be just screaming for Jake
they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!
by stufr on Dec 31, 2011 6:36 AM PST reply actions 1 recs

by 































