Earl Thomas on the 3rd Down, A-Gap, Safety Blitz
Earl Thomas' individual stats to this point in pass defense may be lower than many expected heading into the season, but he's been racking up numbers around the line of scrimmage. Thomas has five tackles for loss - tied for second on the team with K.J. Wright and one behind team leader Brandon Mebane (6). Additionally, he's been a factor behind the line of scrimmage on plays where he doesn't make the tackle.
His four QB pressures lead Seahawks' defensive backs (T7 for safety's in the NFL). He has one of the team's seven batted passes. He's the only member of the secondary to register a quarterback hit. Though, he does not have a piece of the defensive backfield's three sacks. On the whole, he's been the most "productive" secondary member in terms of harassing the quarterback. One of the more effective ways of doing so has been on an A-gap safety blitz.
Because Thomas isn't the biggest defensive back (listed at 5'10", 202) he's prone to getting knocked around a bit in the trenches. That said, he is an absolute kamikaze with admirable resilience; he's willing to get knocked down, and try again. I'm not advocating the over-use of this concept, one the Seahawks go with a couple of times a game, as this blitz is a call that exposes the backend in pass defense. However, his effectiveness on a well-timed, "third and pass" safety blitz is something that has stood out to me in person throughout the year.
Thomas' combination of compact size, agility and terrific speed allows him to sneak behind the rush and explode through the line, like a jack-in-the-box. Consequently, Thomas has cashed in on a few opportunities, helping the defense make big plays, and he's done it in each of the past two games. These are team first plays where Thomas is simply a factor, not necessarily the primary play maker.
Before we get to the recent examples, here is the play that initially struck me way back in Week 3. Oddly enough, Danny did a piece on Thomas and the blitz before Week 3 noting that the Seahawks may have to "dial" something up to get to Kevin Kolb, so I find this play well timed.
It's 3rd and 9 in Seahawks' territory. The defense has three linemen and six defensive backs. Thomas is circled. At the snap, he will start to rush. Also, all five defenders on the line of scrimmage pre-snap will rush the passer.
As Kolb drops back, you can see the offensive linemen start to pick up the rushers. The circled Thomas could have a clear shot to the quarterback, depending on who the lineman in front of him (the center) picks up.
Here is another look at Thomas' path. Presumably, the center and fullback are responsible for picking up Thomas and Matt McCoy (#52). But this is where Thomas' speed and unique ability to play off of his teammates is a factor. Thomas initially rushes towards the overloaded side. The Cardinals have enough blockers, but Thomas' deception and the cutback into the A-gap is what makes this blitz work.
Thomas (circled) comes clean, now jack-in-the-boxing into Kolb's throwing lane. Notice a few yards in back of Thomas; the fullback slid to help the center double team McCoy, instead of sliding over to stop Thomas.
Here is another look. Four Cardinals are blocking three Seahawks on the right of the screen. Two lineman are in 1 on 1 with defenders on the left. All Thomas has to do is disrupt.
Thomas doesn't get his hands on the ball, as it deflects off of his helmet. In this case, that's enough to do the job and register the batted pass. The pass feel incomplete in an empty area of the field. There's the dial up, props to Danny.
Moving on to a few more recent examples; this next play is from Week 12 against the Redskins. This is a 3rd and 6, the ball on Washington's side of the field. Seattle is in nickel (one more down lineman, one less defensive back than the first play).
Tight end Fred Davis moves off the end of the line and motions in, stopping behind the center and ultimately setting up in the backfield to the quarterback's left (below).
Thomas starts to come in before the snap.
The ball is snapped. Dissimilar to the first play, Thomas is already at the line. Notice how he is low and positioned behind the soon-to-be rushing lineman; five players total rush on the play.
This next view is just after the snap. 
The arrow is on Thomas, who is beginning to loop inside - Roy Helu is setting up in front of Grossman, waiting to make the block. The underlined player is Davis, who steps up to take Clemons on the edge. The starred player is the left tackle; notice how he is turned towards the outside. This will keep him from eventually helping effectively against Anthony Hargrove, the rusher in front of Thomas.
Another view with Thomas circled.
Thomas gets stonewalled by Helu. Unlike play one, the offense kept two players in to protect and it looks like it helped. Grossman will have time to throw.
But again, Thomas disrupts the throwing lane in the middle by leaping. Though Grossman isn't looking that way (he's looking out to the right), Thomas is able to take away that side of the field. He's creating chaos up the middle; quarterback's don't like chaos in the middle.
Here is another view. #71 is the tackle that was previously distracted by the blitz, which therefore left the guard mostly 1 on 1 with Hargrove. Here you see Hargrove bearing down on Grossman, fighting through the single team.
Hargrove collapses the pocket and Grossman goes down. Though Thomas doesn't make the play and is actually nowhere near the sack, he occupies two defenders. If Thomas doesn't catch the attention of the tackle, Hargrove likely faces the double team. Presumably, Helu still picks up Thomas and Grossman simply has a cleaner pocket to work from; maybe it's a sack. Right after that play happened I texted a friend "ET made that sack," as it was clear from my upper-deck seat that Thomas had a major role in creating that play. This is a play that won't show up on the stat sheet.
This final play, the Brandon Browner tipped pick from Week 13, intrigues me because I think it's an interesting example that highlights both the good and bad of a call like this. In real time, this was a complete bang-bang play; I wasn't sure how much of an effect Thomas had on the throw, or if the ball was catchable. After breaking it down, I can see how one could view this play with the glass half empty or half full. Anyway, on we go.
Seattle is in nickel with four lineman, similar to play two, on 3rd and 10. Unlike to the previous plays, there is only one blocker in the backfield. Thomas is circled, and he will creep in before the snap. The player behind him (Kam Chancellor) will drop, as will the corner on top (Richard Sherman). The two boxed linebackers (Hawthorne, Hill) will come up onto the line pre-snap, then blitz.
The pre-snap motion has occurred; this is at the snap.
Here is the view just after the snap (the lines drawn by Mayock in the booth). Hawthorne's A-gap blitz has occupied the center - the second A-gap blitzer is a wrinkle we didn't see in the first examples - while Hill will occupy McCoy on the left side. This leaves Thomas free, as the Eagles' # 87 will not come back across to pick up the blitz.
Trickeration; both defensive ends drop, as shown by the arrows, and this becomes a five man pressure. The tackle (underlined) gets caught in no man's land due to the blitz's design, but unlike the play above he recovers enough to help double team the defensive tackle. Hill's rush from the outside keeps McCoy out of Thomas' way.
Thomas is hiding underneath the arrow.
A better view of the play. Notice how the recovery by the tackle allows the left guard to at least try and re-direct Thomas. Meanwhile, Hill is bearing down on Young. At the same time, Young has identified the soft spot in the zone behind Hargrove. The open receiver on the top left is Riley Cooper. This is a timing route; an on-time, solid throw underneath the deep safety will get the first down. Check out the cut and separation created by Cooper (below).
(Ball is released as Cooper makes the cut.)
As I said, a good throw gets the first down. A good throw should basically be there by now. But this is where Thomas comes in...
...Literally. Hill pushes McCoy into Young and Thomas makes contact with Young's hand coming through. As you can see, Cooper has not yet come out of his break. This is where I think personal opinion becomes a factor. On one side of the coin, Thomas makes a good play by disrupting the timing of the play. On the other side, one could say Thomas should have been more disruptive or even gotten the half-sack.
Young still makes an on-target throw, but it floats and wobbles just a bit. Enough so that Cooper can't hold on, a ball he arguably should have caught.
Instead, it bounces right into the arms of Brandon Browner. One could say this play was created by Thomas' tip and resulting disruption of the timing; or you could say Thomas didn't have enough of an effect and the result was merely the ball bouncing the right way at the right time. In this particular game of inches, the Seahawks win.
In looking at all three plays, Thomas could arguably make a more complete play in each scenario, but hes only 22. Last year Carroll referred to Thomas as a "neophyte" in a midseason press conference. When Carroll spoke about the similarities between Troy Polamalu and Thomas earlier this year before the game in Pittsburgh, Carroll equated Thomas to Troy in potential only, not as a finished product.
Obviously there is room for improvement and the expectation is that Thomas will grow, but the upside is Carroll and defensive coordinator Gus Bradley are finding ways to get Thomas involved in their pressure scheme early in his development. They are learning his strengths and weaknesses as more than just a deep safety, at times getting results, and figuring how to further unleash Thomas' versatility in the future. In my opinion, that's something to look at with the glass half full.
10 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent breakdown, nice work
I think that Thomas’s blitzing ability is hurt greatly by not having a real factor as a DT or a nose tackle. He usually seems to run some sort of stunt, starting out but cutting in, and that’s really it (variations thereof) which means that RBs just have to stand in front of the QB and wait for the block. If we can get a true beast of a player down inside there, maybe through the draft, perhaps the RBs will be forced to help out on that block and that’ll break Thomas free for more sacks.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Dec 7, 2011 11:43 AM PST reply actions
Thank you, much appreciated.
I agree that a penetrating, rushing DT could help us. I think the variations with DL-drops and using other back seven players as blitzers (in addition to the stunts) are to remedy the lack of consistent push. Using less rushers and/or complex blitzes but still freeing Thomas to the quarterback would be a welcomed change.
Great breakdown, really nice work
I just have a problem with this conflating pass defense production with interceptions:
Earl Thomas’ productivity to this point in pass defense may be lower than many expected heading into the season – one interception compared to four for Kam Chancellor
Interceptions come from a combination of luck and good ball skills, but don’t necessarily result from solid play. DBs that take risks in coverage may generate high interception numbers while giving up big plays (though high interception numbers don’t necessarily mean risky play).
While I was excited about the number of times ET touched the ball last year, he was likely responsible for a number of blown plays (maybe including the Greg Olsen TD in the playoffs) in a pass defense that gave up a bunch. The fact that he’s touching the ball less frequently this year may mean that he’s playing better, more conservative, assignment-correct OR that teams are avoiding throwing near him OR that he was just luckier with targets last year than this year.
tl;dr Interceptions alone don’t determine the quality of pass defense by an individual DB.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Dec 7, 2011 12:06 PM PST reply actions
Also aren't we one of the top defenses in stopping the "big play"
I think ET’s contributions have been drastically overlooked by the interception totals. Given a better a pass rush (an actual pass rush) and playing with a lead, ET should wreak havoc.
Thank you, and fair point.
How one is actually playing isn’t necessarily equated through numbers either way. I was merely pointing out he’s not showing up on the stat sheet and standing out as a ball-hawk like some expected.
He had a pick taken away due to a penalty, and then those two plays in the south endzone corner with Browner stand out as almosts (to me)…
Really great piece
Terrific use of screenshots.
Great post
And I love the ocasional secondary blitz. Especially against weak QBs.
by clutterheart on Dec 7, 2011 3:00 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Last year's Bears game
The Seahawks killed the Bears with well-timed and executed safety blitzes last year. Lawyer Milloy had a field day. I expect a repeat in two weeks. Against a lowly-regarded rookie QB? Oh, yeah.
Hard to see, but is Mebane in any of these plays?
Kind of a big tell: Mebane out, pass-rush DTs in, Safety blitz.
"Arguably should have caught?"
I think there is no question at all that Cooper should have caught that ball. That was a gift to Browner.
Nice read. I like to watch Earl play the game. He’s got great talent and great desire. He’s going to be good and getting better for years.

























































