Round Number Three, Thread Number Three, Mambo Number Five
Now there's a song you haven't thought about since 1999.
Continue your discussion of various draft pipe dreams here.
821 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is that a women's rollerderby team? Because that would be hilariously awesome.
Work hard, play harder, rest easy.
Unfortunately, I hear that song abused far too often...
I hear it in commercials or something… but jesus, it’s a terrible song.
In fact, fuck the 13 year old who likes Fridays, that was the worst song ever.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 5:46 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The truth behind the Rebecca Black conspiracy
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow. This is interesting.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats just crazy enough to work!
Jenkins your a genius!
by FisteeFisterer on Apr 29, 2011 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Duh
They have an elite talent in Ponder
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions
So was Vince Young
and Max Hall
and Matt Lienart.
Wins are the most overrated stat for colleg QB’s
Learn JiuJitsu, it's fun.
>_>
Should use the sarcasm font but don’t know how
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions
You seem to be pretty bad at picking up on sarcasm and remembering people's past comments.
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions
David Greene was a winner too!
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions
...Is it really weird that I think this whole instant-meme is superfunny?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Nice!
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Nah
You misspelled. And you should enlarge your poetic library.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions
The hell
Are you calling me a borogrove?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Pete's a fool.
Stuffed crust pizzas are nasty.
I like that pick.
I want the CB Shareece from USC too.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
I hope we trade every pick we have left for greater picks in the future.
No one strikes me as being great, and I would like to be like the Patriots, who view draft picks as working capital. Time value of money baby. There are two type of people in this world- those who pay interest, and those who receive it.
Just got off work
Does anyone have an link that is working well?
Kyle Kapernick?
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Kyle is his clone
He’s hidden. We’re drafting him in the 6th
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Mel Kiper called him "Kyle"
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Not Meth
but X maybe
Pete seems like a raver
Opinions are like assholes , I once saw my Uncle's. - Megan Amram
He smokes, then he retires with his harem of Song Girls
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, because a Texans coach pissed hot a few years back and got served a suspension
by Modrik Zutar on Apr 29, 2011 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Geez KC's is gonna have a good D-line
And what’s with Denver and LBs?
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm calling it
9ers are gonna panic and trade up to snatch Mallett before we can get there
Fucks socks.
There went the Houston I was hoping for.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
I"m on the Mallett bandwagon but only because of the 15 seconds of footage I just saw
by Great Sergios Ghost on Apr 29, 2011 5:57 PM PDT reply actions
That's awesome
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
Just didn't seem like close to a need for them.
And when the first thing the talking heads mention about a pick is his good blocking skills on 3rd down… eh.
Work hard, play harder, rest easy.
Barber is declining
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
This draft class in general seems weak
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions
It's pretty strong in some fields
No top-tier OL but good depth. Pretty solid DL depth and top class, and some decent edge rushers. Some top-tier WR and CB prospects but not impressed by the depth.
It’s kind of talent-poor because of last year’s draft
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Did everyone already talk about how we can trade for Palmer now that the bengals have Dalton?
by insidetheparker on Apr 29, 2011 6:00 PM PDT reply actions
Who's this guy Palmer?
Sounds like a shlub.
by wyte_lightning on Apr 29, 2011 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Hell yeah.
Jordan gonna tear it up
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Still don't care for it
His last playoff game was just terrible. I didn’t even know what he was throwing at
personal issues aside
Mallett in the 3rd round, a back up with potential and fire on his ass right now is a god damned steal
by G-Mo on Apr 29, 2011 6:00 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I think there's a lot of truth to this.
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe not, they can afford to burn a couple or a hundred.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
If I didn't see the word Mallet again until he's drafted...
… I’d be happy and sane.
by sev79 on Apr 29, 2011 6:02 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Imagine if Locker hadn't already gone!
by Trojan Knight on Apr 29, 2011 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Mallett Mallett Mallett Mallett
Mallett Mallett?
Mallett's biggest issue other than his head
Is his ability to play QB.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
What part of it?
He reads defenses as well as any QB in this leage, and has a huge arm
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Based on the tape I've seen of Mallett, he's the best QB physically by FAR.
He must either be a real dumbass, a total jerk, a meth addict or some combination of these. I can’t believe that teams would pass on him because of some nasty articles. Because no team has stepped up and taken him, I have a hard time believing there isn’t some serious baggage (beyond "he cusses on his Facebook page and listens to Eminem).
by mkries on Apr 29, 2011 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Any day now, Aints.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
Straight from Seahawks.com commentary
i just think that the egales have the ability to traid and the hawks go back why not
by izahawk at 8:59 PM
I don’t even know what this means…
It means you're wasting time reading the comments at Seahawks.com
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions
True, hanging my head in shame.
But it is kind of like Jersey Shore. Wow I didn’t help myself did I?
Jesus.
Does Willie Roaf have a neck?!? That’s a giant giant man.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:04 PM PDT reply actions
Heh
The heir apparent to Brady is here?
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
He should feel blessed at the opportunity to fan Brady with a giant leaf
While Brady’s goddesses hand feed him grapes
No
They’re just going to turn him into a #1 pick to trade away
They have two picks
They might look to trade one
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I also like Moffitt
dude is such a monster
by Modrik Zutar on Apr 29, 2011 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Any. Friggin. Day.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
If the Patriots draft Mallet he will sit for 2 years before he is traded...
to Oakland for like 3 first round picks
So.....how about Mason Foster?
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
I think we need a linebacker
Seriously. Tats is finished, in my opinion.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Only pick that would make me happy
is Mason Foster
Please grab Christian Ballard, please, Seahawks.
Potential first rounder in the middle of the third? Yes please.
I could definitely live with this.
I’m going to be sad if they don’t go DL with this pick.
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe Pats put the rumor out there to encourage a trade
Would be typical Pats trick
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
He's got papers on his desk.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Like I said, we're trading out of the draft for a stuffed crust pizza.
by BrianL on Apr 29, 2011 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Honestly
I couldn’t fault them for that. I know the feeling.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Wanting a stuffed crust pizza?
Pete should know better, that’s always followed by deep remorse because those are nasty.
In all seriousness, that's a great pickup for the Pats.
by BrianL on Apr 29, 2011 6:10 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Ditto.
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
by Miskatonic Fighting Cephalopods on Apr 29, 2011 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Great job, Schneider.
Why not trade this pick too, you fucking moron.
How will you spend YOUR Sundays now?
by Hmph on Apr 29, 2011 6:11 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Wow.
Really?
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
by Miskatonic Fighting Cephalopods on Apr 29, 2011 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
But true, not a lot
Surprising reaches for WRs and RBs
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions
To be perfectly frank
How many of us think they would’ve taken Mallett here?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Tom Jackson is the only person I want to hear with Boomer on ESPN
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Looks like they took a Mallett
To our hopes.
YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Are we done driving this into the ground now? Because I really think we've hammered the point about Mallett enough.
Work hard, play harder, rest easy.
They look happy.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
ahahahaaa
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Another Guard
Guess they didn’t like their O line last year, eh?
FUCK YES
Lady Gaga, Goodell fucking loves the NFL fanbase
I don't understand the fuss...
Mallett is a commodity. The very fact that he’ll be the back-up in NE to Tom Brady will probably make him worth a 1st rounder to some other team. Mark my words… he won’t be a Patriot in 3 years
Hey, we could actually play the guy.
It would be even BETTER for us.
I hate him but McShay described all the reasons why I don't want Mallett
And frankly Mallett’s biggest weakness is also Brady’s.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
It's pretty widespread to not want spoilers being posted on here.
It’s not just me. And I enjoy commentary from people who, you know, actually know something about the Seahawks.
Most of us want to watch and comment together.
Being first to post “RESULTS!” when everyone else is on a different pace is the actual information based version of “FIRST!”
Waste of space. Only instead of just being obnoxious, you’re actually ruining everyone else’s flow too.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm hoping that was an addition to my comment and not a response?
Since we’re on the same side of the debate here
Exactly.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions
It's not a difficult request
Some of us want to watch TV and hear the picks there. How difficult is it to NOT post them before the TV has them? Exactly. If you do it anyway, you’re an asshole. Pure and simple.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
I would like to propose this as an addition to the site rules that were posted a few days ago
by Mpjohns3 on Apr 29, 2011 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
This.
Mods?
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Official ruling
Stop posting ahead of the TV feeds.
by BrianL on Apr 29, 2011 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 7 recs
Yes, but some of us don't want to
Some of us want to have the TV on and read this thread. You’re ruining it for those people, and for no reason. What’s to gain? For anyone?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Again
What do you lose by not posting spoilers in this thread? Other people gain when you do not do it, while nobody gains anything when you do.
Why are you guys being so stubborn on this?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks
Sorry if I came off as dickish about it, but it’s slightly irksome.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
You didn't, sorry on my part also.
And its an official rule now so we can all now move along to making fun of the Raiders or Bills.
by forte40 on Apr 29, 2011 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well said.
Thanks for seeing the other (slower) side.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions
If you realize you are on a faster pace than us...
it’s pretty easy. Watch the thread, wait for the general commentariot to start commenting on a player, and then chime in with an opinion.
Even better, you’ll have had time to concoct an actual reaction and detail as opposed to a 5 word sentence that bespeaks of the “Me FIRST I HAVE IT FIRST” mentality of posting spoilers.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions
So we just sit around and wait until someone watching on TV says who's picked?
by B.B.Finnegan on Apr 29, 2011 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Sure.
Not too hard. Be the first to add a comment on top of someone elses. Then instead of a bunch of single comments, we can get subthread trees actually commenting on a player. Not a bad way to go, and your post will actually be more likely to be read that way anyway.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I haven't even noticed the spoilers, honestly
Why is the TV not live? I don’t understand
by B.B.Finnegan on Apr 29, 2011 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
Mayock could suddenly decide to tear off his shirt and cause nipplegate 2
We don’t want that
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions
then watch tv
And get off the internet.
You sound like a rep for espn for crying out loud
by vertigoman on Apr 29, 2011 6:23 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Tom Cable clearly has taken over the front office.
by nflnbafanatic on Apr 29, 2011 6:15 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I am going to throw up.
They do realize it’s not 1937, right?
by djafrot on Apr 29, 2011 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
HAHAHA "We're going to take a break".
FUCK YOU NFLN
We don't have needs absolutely outweight Oline
So, BPA for the win
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Well the casual fan has been saying that since Hutch left, so ...
What’s really going to piss me off is if somehow, Matt is resigned and magically the line looks awful again.
by BrianL on Apr 29, 2011 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Has the pick come over the tv yet?
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
you start with the foundation
Jesus I sound corny
You sound rather concrete to me.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions
We're going to field a team of 10 offensive linemen and Beast Mode, apparently.
How will you spend YOUR Sundays now?
You could easily get some one trick ponies
like Craig Terrill only better.
Recently engaged! Best. Off-season. Ever.
Now we just need to bring in Robert Gallery
And we have an entirely new Tom Cable O-line
Obviously we are going for a power run game
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
LOVE THIS
PICK.
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
by Miskatonic Fighting Cephalopods on Apr 29, 2011 6:16 PM PDT reply actions
haha
I like him.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Everyone rec this vid. It's GREAT!!!!!
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Unger can play center
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Er....Moffitt
3rd round picks aren’t guarantees.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
this is were you draft guards
how many starting guards in this league are drafted in the top 2 rounds… my bet is not many
GSP is going to wreck Shields
I’m looking forward to Aldo vs. Hominick.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
GSP is way better than Dan Henderson ever will be. If Shields can't take GSP down the fight is over.
FOTN will be Diaz vs. MacDonald.
I got SOTN going to the Hendo/Bocek winner, and KOTN to Aldo.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
IF he can't I agree
but he’s taken down much bigger guys time and time again.
He taped Jon Fitch and Vinny Margalesh in BJJ competion and sub’d the guy who choked GSP in the same night.
If Jake gets on top of GSP it’s gonna be nuts.
Learn JiuJitsu, it's fun.
Would have been cool if they made 32 of them with all the teams...
then we could at least bet on which team’s commercial would pop up next.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I like this one a lot
8 picks tomorrow, time to take some risks
ESPN guys don't like him
So he must be good, right?
"Spencer has been up and down"
Piss off, Gruden.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
It's a good pick, but just let down
I demand a trade right now for Stanzi
by G-Mo on Apr 29, 2011 6:19 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
So you want to trade for another 5th round pick?
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
I just got off the phone with Beef Moe
YAYAYA DAT IS STRAIGHT CRUNK. I iz gung straight up BEEF MOE every snap next year. Dat be a mad crazy line man MAD CRAZY
It won't be unsatisfying when we actually run the ball for
more than 50 yards a game.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions
I kinda worry the same about Gallery.
I’ve thought about it so much that I almost assume he’s already ours.
No QB in the offseason and I will prematurely declare the season over
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Premature is the key word
And one I stay away from
With a good running game, CW will be adequate.
Wait for Barkley
by stufr on Apr 29, 2011 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, I agree.
But I’m glad that PC/JS aren’t grabbing a QB just to grab one if they don’t see one they like.
There is that, yes.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions
50 bucks more says he eats it!
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorta like the purple people eaters...
Only not…
Hey,
Boogers are people too
canadian eh
by Unidentified flying orgasms on Apr 29, 2011 6:43 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Robert could run behind this line.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
by hazbro24 on Apr 29, 2011 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
In Q/PM's world
Drafting a project QB and then forcing him into a badly set offense gives you a high chance of a bust. There are only project QBs in this year’s draft.
Instead, they build up an offense in a year when that’s the best option available (Oline), and next year or later pick up a QB who can be more readily plugged in
It makes perfect sense, just not for this year.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
When they like whoever is available with the picks
We have an enormous amount of holes. Did you expect them to fix it all in one draft? Don’t get me wrong, both of these picks make me go “yes, need filled” only to then think “awww but we have so many needs left”. But that was inevitable
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I expected them to prioritize their needs a little better.
Gritty, run first guards in the third in combination with a run first RT in the first seems like a pretty negligent use of the resources they have.
This isn't a case of BPA happening to be offensive lineman.
They’re targeting these guys and for me thats not an encouraging sign of what they’re trying to build.
I'm starting to worry about the offense for the same reason I worry about the defense and the leo position.
I’m not convinced what they want to do works
I don't know how to use the sarcasm font
A solid running game sets up the pass and eats up clock which keeps the D off the field and rested.
by stufr on Apr 29, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
You can't in the subject line, but if you just put a @
on each side of what you’re writing it looks like this
These are talented guys.
We haven’t had a talented line in a long time, and the last time we did directly connects with the high water mark of the Seahawks. I just can’t figure why you are so opposed to rebuilding the OL with talent as opposed to a patchwork guesswork of 5th and 6th round players.
You’ve been adamant against going OL heavy early in the draft as long as I have been for it. We’ve gone that route. Now let’s both sit back and see maybe, just maybe, you could be wrong and we’ll be much improved and turn ourselves into a far more competitive team inherently.
I’ve mentioned reasons to go RT early before, and this pick is just a continuation of that. Our QB situation is a reflection of our lack of a strong OL, so is our consistent lack of an effective running game since Shaun faded. It isn’t a coincidence.
There isn’t a doubt in my mind Pete wants to overpower other teams, wear them down, and be the stronger more powerful team in the 4th. In addition, 8 to 10 minute drives for the offense have a funny way of making the defense inherently better.
This might just be a case of BPA being OL, just not YOUR BPA, but the BPA under the philosophy that our coach and front office have built up and believe in. Sounds like an optimistic view to me—- after all, we actually fucking have a philosophy for once.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions 13 recs
Hear hear.
This, so many times, is exactly how I feel right now.
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I did my part to make this green
Rec this shit
by Mpjohns3 on Apr 29, 2011 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wow.
I didn’t see greenville coming when I posted it, but that’s cool, guys. Glad to see the “Build the Line” crew is swelling with members!
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I never thought I would say this
But I am in complete agreement with Whiskey
by stufr on Apr 29, 2011 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
You realize this has happened a couple of times recently?
We’re not ALWAYS diametrically opposed, and I swear I’m not crazy!
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions
We just went through an ugly time
I’m starting to think that we are closer on actual football issues.
Lets just not be 7-9 again and our issues won’t come up
Heheh.
Fair enough. I suppose that’s the way these things go, though.
That’s the way these things go though. I respect your opinion and really don’t hold grudges, in fact I don’t even remember what it was about in the past. I do remember a few days ago when you said essentially the same thing in a thread and I laughed about it.
I’m sure I may very well have been drunk, and I KNOW I was fired up in the moment, but that’s just me. Whatever it was, perhaps some day we can have a pint and laugh about it while we talk about our favorite team.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Taking these kinds of guys in the mid rounds isn't patchwork guess work.
I know you think having a dominant right tackle is worth a first round pick, and maybe it can add that can’t of value to your team, but that does not mean thats where you should draft them. Kickers can also be highly valuable, we all remember Josh Brown’s contributions to the team, but you don’t draft them high because you can generally find the similar value for a fraction of the cost. I’m not against building a strong offensive line, I’m against spending like a fool to do it.
Our QB situation is a reflection of our lack of a strong OL
I’d love for you to expand on that because boy does that sound like the exact opposite of what you’ve been saying for a long time.
by Nate Dogg on Apr 29, 2011 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Don't get me wrong.
Our QB situation has been bad, but so has our line play. We didn’t get a chance to fix one, at least we can fix the other in a single year. I’ll take that.
I’m not blaming Hasselbeck’s lack of performance on solely him or the talent surrounding him. They go hand in hand, and I’ve said that all along. I think, in the right situation, he could still be “okay” for a couple more years. By okay I mean barely tolerable.
I don’t believe that is with us. We need a strong armed play action guy, to fit with our newly found smashmouth style and the need to stretch the field once teams throw 8, 9 or 10 in the box. Hass isn’t that guy.
Perhaps if we would have addressed the OL a few years ago, Hass would look better with us today, but that ship has sailed and I wish him well wherever he ends up, at least 14 games a year, and maybe 16.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I honestly don't think at this point that you will ever think a road grading team of early OL non LT picks will ever be worth it.
If the team becomes stronger over a long period of time and yearly gets to address other issues because the line is set, will that improve/alter your perception, or are you stone cold adamant against it no matter if the results prove you wrong?
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats not true, I would have been fine with Carpenter, Hudson, Franklin in the second.
You’re jumping ahead again though. If the team becomes stronger over a long period of time and yearly gets to address other issues doesn’t change that they overspent to do it. They could have addressed other needs this year with their top picks and still picked guys similar to Moffitt a couple rounds later.
Similar to Moffitt in terms of relative assinged value
But how many will actually pan out? Most won’t. It’s easy to lump five guys together and say they’re basically the same guy, but in reality, 2 will be out of the league in a year, 2 will be backups, and 1 might just be a pro bowler. If Seattle’s confident in their scouting and think he’s the one who’s going to be the pro bowler, perhaps that’s why you take him. Instead of someone a round later who’s probably out of the league in a year. I don’t know, just a thought.
by B.B.Finnegan on Apr 29, 2011 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Well said, and kind of what I was getting at by taking them earlier, not later.
"When Pete first got here he said he wanted to establish the run and stop the run
Pete’s the architect and Cable’s the contractor." --Greetings from the Lord Humongous!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe they could have gotten those guys.
I have yet to see a team build their offensive line in a single year (or two years total) out of FA signings and 4th-6th round draft picks.
And Carpenter was a late riser and I think less a surprise pick to teams than to fans and (most) pundits.
"When Pete first got here he said he wanted to establish the run and stop the run
Pete’s the architect and Cable’s the contractor." --Greetings from the Lord Humongous!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I just replied to you other comment with this but the Chiefs did it.
They had 1 first round pick, 3 undrafted free agents and a six round pick starting along their offensive line last year.
He never said it's impossible
Just less likely. I don’t see how that can be up for debate, it’s a self-evident point.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions
No it's not.
I haven’t seen any evidence that building a good offensive line requires high draft picks across.
But do we need to aim for great?
Will good suffice and let us shore up other parts of the team?
Not all positions can be great, or even good
Nature of the NFL. Are you saying the FO is absolutely wrong prioritizing the OLine?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not saying they're absolutely anything.
But there are other needs on this team that are just as important that have gone unaddressed.
Yes
We have more needs than high picks. We already knew that coming into the draft. So what does one do?
(For the record I would’ve preferred Jimmy Smith to Carpenter)
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Not absolutely wrong
but they’re going about it in a questionable way. They’re using a lot of capital on positions that can probably be had cheaper while a position that demands the use of first round resources and can be a huge boon to the offensive line in and of itself is being neglected.
For example
Could we have taken Smith in the first to shore up corner, a similar tackle in the second round, and a similar guard in the fourth?
Perhaps it’s a slight decrease in line talent, but you might make up for it overall with much improved cornerback talent.
I can see this argument regarding Carpenter
Especially considering the talent on the board.
I don’t see it regarding Moffitt. We could’ve taken him at 57 and no one would’ve batted an eyelid, instead we got trade value and then picked him. Straight up value pick.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, could we get a guard with that #2 pick in the fourth round
that provides most of what Moffitt can?
Have you seen some of the front 7 talent left?
Like I pointed out in another thread. Chris Carter, Sam Acho, Chris Ballard. I love where we’re sitting there in Dline. Off the top of my head, I can’t name a guard I like as much.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Moffitt probably would have been gone by 99.
The best guard right now is Clint Boling who’s not athletic enough to playing in the Seahawks’ scheme. Then there’s a big drop off.
I agree about Carpenter, I would have liked Smith at 1.25, but with his red flags it's hard to find too much fault
If he ends up suspended/in jail/out of the league for behavioral issues than the Carpenter pick looks very smart.
Moffitt is the Andy Dalton of guards.
Pretty average athleticism, gritty, winner. Gets a lot of credit for the run first attitude of Wisconsin’s scheme. But thats what this FO wants. They need dirtbag road graders to clear the way for Beastmode.
What position are you talking about?
There were no likely QB prospects at 25. Could’ve argued for Mallett at 57, I guess, but I like trading back and getting good value.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, I like Mallett a lot but he was never in the works.
It’s a good point, that guy probably wasn’t there. I don’t think quarterback is the only position more scarce than guard though. This team doesn’t have a second starting corner back and doesn’t have a 3-tech on the roster. Those are spots that require better athletes.
Maybe the front office likes Tru, Thurmond, and Browner
more than we know. And thinks those 3 at corner are perfectly suitable with a depth pick late in the draft. Or we’re planning on spending big for Nhamdi once free agency opens up. It’s hard to fault the process when we don’t know all of it.
We're in agreement there
But I know my manlove for Jimmy Smith is completely unrational.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Not completely.
But a great offensive line can make an average QB look very good. Pretty much any quarterback in the NFL can pick apart a defense if he has all day to throw it.
They seem to do pretty well for all that
Sanchez is worse than average though.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions
As a team they do very well.
They’ve poured tons of resources into their defense and took advantage of uncapped years to put together the best offensive line in football and surround the quarterback they took fifth overall (even the defense first three yards and a cloud of dust Jets knew they had to find a franchise QB) with weapons. If the Seahawks want to follow the Jets’ path they’ll need to sign Nnamdi, the Josephs, Mebane, Spencer and TO. And their defense still wouldn’t match the Jets’.
We're not fielding a competitive team this year
Was that ever in question? It shouldn’t have been.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Coach said to look at the Jets
I was just trying to explain why, beyond the fact that they’re terrible at throwing the ball, they’re not the best example of how to build a team.
He wasn't pointing at them for how to build a team
Just for the relation OL-mediocre QB
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions
That doesn't make sense
By definition investing higher picks provides for a better chance at getting good players. Isn’t that the whole point of the draft?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Nor is it for QBs
We’ve had a couple of UDFA QBs work out. By your logic, that means we should just gamble on being able to do that again?
I get what you’re saying, though, RT and OG are position where you can get viable starters more easily in later rounds. That doesn’t negate the value of more talent on the OLine though.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats not my logic at all.
It’s not that it happens once in a while, it’s consistent enough to be a viable way to build an offensive line. And I’m not advocating only using UDFAs.
And I'm saying
That the fact that a position tends to have decent value in middle rounds doesn’t mean the draft becomes meaningless as a way to rank talent. It’s different for each position. I don’t believe in 1st-round RBs anymore, and I do believe LT, CB, QB and DE remain the premium 1st-round positions, but with enough talent almost any position can be vaulted up into the 1st (specialists aside).
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Fair enough.
How many years did they shuffle low tier guys in and out before they finally found the 4 6th round or later guys? Or did it take them several years to get those guys?
"When Pete first got here he said he wanted to establish the run and stop the run
Pete’s the architect and Cable’s the contractor." --Greetings from the Lord Humongous!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Defense will be better
now that they’ll actually be able to get off the field once in a while
Not neccesarilly
Lynch is still the dirt cheap back, could be a system with more faith in the O-Line than runners
It doesn't scare the shit out of me or piss me off, though, and I kinda see that as a plus.
I don’t mind conservative as opposed to stupid and reckless.
by Matt Erickson on Apr 29, 2011 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm guessing we go D-line early and often tomorrow
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
Getting word the Seahawks are looking to re-tool the o-line
RB by committee featuring Beef Moe, Forsett, Leonard Weaver with a bionic leg, TJ Duckett, and Michael Turner.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
by SSreporters on Apr 29, 2011 6:24 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I don't know why I'm so angry right now.
I don’t know anything about any of these players, and I just feel like Q/PM have no idea what they’re doing this year.
How will you spend YOUR Sundays now?
They don't. They are just tossing darts at a board to decide who to pick.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
by Wayward Llama on Apr 29, 2011 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Looks to me like they had a plan going in
and are executing it.
This is the year we shore up our O-Line. Makes sense to me!
by chrees on Apr 29, 2011 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
We have weapons.
Now we’re getting a new O line.
Have a bajillion $ in cap space, so it looks like FA $ will be for the D.
Mayby Namde
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
I can't wait until they get a quarterback!
Which should be….when exactly?
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
You mean Grossman isn't the answer? Shocked, I am.
I think they had a lot of other issues to fix anyway.
Work hard, play harder, rest easy.
THE SEX CANNON!
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Mayock said on the radio that the Skins are gonna keep Rex
Shanny loves him
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
CARROLL!
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Is everything awesome?
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
Holy shit... Just noticed that
It’s like a snake trying to slither its way off his face
Got in a fistfight with Cable last week
Why do you think they’re drafting all linemen.
How will you spend YOUR Sundays now?
by Hmph on Apr 29, 2011 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
This draft is boring
I’m reading old game threads from last season.
Wins, losses, they’re all funny.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Crap, we lost 40-21 to the Niners
Ugly.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
by SSreporters on Apr 29, 2011 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Will the NFL draft be televised in 2017
when the Patriots officially hold every pick of the first 4 rounds?
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
Tomorrow is going to be really interesting.
7 picks I make it. Including some high 4ths.
O-Line is good and all,
But if the team averages 3.8 YPC next year when everyone stacks the box because they don’t respect Charlie Whitehurst, Cable would probably get canned. Free Agency is going to be big for this team this offseason.
I think our receivers and Charlie are good enough.
With a good O-line protecting him and a good running game, I think it will actually balance out nicely. Jesus has a strong arm and can stretch the field if he actually has enough time for our receivers to get down the field.
See Matt Cassel in KC.
We’re going to duplicate that for starters and work our way up from there.
We shall win the war in the trenches, boys!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Seattle should redraft Nick Reed
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Hey, Mason Foster just got picked
Go get ’em!
by BrooklynPreacher on Apr 29, 2011 6:40 PM PDT reply actions
Tampa Bay is going to be beastly
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
I hope not...
I enjoy making fun of all the fans
Foster is a great grab this late.
Grats Foster, you will be missed at UW.
Yay
Love national coverage for Seahawks
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I feel like we're copying the Jets formula.
They got D’Brick and Mangold first. Next draft worked on the D (Hopefully next year). And nurtured their stud QB with a great running game. That’s are road to success. I believe.
by insidetheparker on Apr 29, 2011 6:50 PM PDT reply actions
Stud QB?
I do hope we pick a better QB than they did
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Eisen asking about the QB run
“Right now Charlie is all we got!”
Plus talking about free agency, mentioning Matt
Didn't he say he was our 3rd rounder unfortunately
Sounds like buyers remorse
by aerozeppelin on Apr 29, 2011 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Because they'll block for ages while Matt Hasselsacks himself.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Hasseltoss?
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
I really do believe bad QB play makes an entire offense (particularly the line) look bad as well.
Heck, I think the line we had last season would have looked serviceable with a better QB
I think stating absolutely that it works either way is a mistake
They interact, in both directions.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions
I think it depend on the quality of either
If you have a great QB, he can make everyone else on that offense look better. If you don’t, a talented OL is the best way to make everyone else better. A great OL gives an average QB time and WRs open. Most good RBs are actually just average RBs behind great lines.
So BrianL is correct, but we won’t be in a position for that to matter for a few years, so build what you can fix now.
Yes
Don’t take a QB in a shitty QB class. Take OLs in a great OL class.
I do kind of like that kind of thinking. Would’ve still liked Jimmy smith over Carpenter.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions
When all QBs are projects
I don’t think its’ a good class
I don't agree with that.
All college quarterbacks are projects. The polished guys are usually players like Ponder and Clausen.
The players this year seem much farther from starter worthy than in most years.
Almost every single one is probably 2-3 years out from just being able to handle everything the NFL will throw at them, not even taking into account if they will be good or not once they’re out there.
They're not
It just seems that way because they’re getting draft so ridiculously high. Dalton in the 2nd? Kaepernick a high 2nd? Ponder and Locker at the top 1st? It’s ridiculous.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Exactly why I consider this a weak QB class.
Players are being drafted much much MUCH earlier than where they should be going. There is a lack of top end QB talent, yet QB needy teams, so they are being overdrafted. If these players were drafted later then being 2-3 years out from starting capable wouldn’t be an issue because it’s expected from that draft position. Where they are being drafted they should be ready to jump onto the field this season, which I just don’t see from this group.
It seems like it wasn't that long ago that fans lamented having to play quarterbacks in the rookie or sophomore years.
I though the platitude was that the best way to develop a quarterback was to have him sit behind a veteran and learn for a couple years? The NFL has adapted to the high cost of first round quarterbacks by playing them early and limiting the play book.
I think a rookie quarterback should sit for a year unless the pieces around them are complete.
Mostly the O-line. If there is protection then I think a polished rookie can succeed. If there is no offensive line then you get a David Carr, who is pummeled into the turf so repeatedly that he loses just about any chance of a career because of being thrown into a bad situation. The QBs this year don’t just need to get used to NFL game speed though, they have major flaws in their game that need fixing before being ready behind even the most solid line.
The line we fielded last year constantly needed help from extra blockers
It was a patch-work line at best and most of its components are FAs.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Even with running a lot of 2 TE sets, we were 16th in sacks allowed.
Not terrible, but definitely not good
I think Polumbus, Okung, Spencer, Gibson all did respectably well at pass blocking.
See the ARI games, the Denver game, the playoffs, etc.
Recently engaged! Best. Off-season. Ever.
Its not the development time
Its what the odds are that they come through that development and are a quality starter
Polished guys are players like Andrew Luck.
Drooooooool…..
by wyte_lightning on Apr 29, 2011 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Specifically the Seahawks?
Or the quality of the draft in general?
I think we won't know until 3 years from now
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions
But Carpenter was at 25
And you don’t know if he will have a better or worse career than Hutch. you can pretend like you do, but he is a first round talent, just like Hutch was.
This is willfully ignorant of the two players situations.
It’s entirely possible that Carpenter goes on to be a hall of fame player, but come on.
Thats all I am saying is that
You have to use some rose colored glasses looking into the past to think that Hutch was a sure thing. People were pissed off when we took him saying that we had reached. It is eerily similar.
Well thats kind of the point.
At those positions thats the kind of player you have to get up into that range of player to justify it.
Walt sure.
Hutch was great, he’s got a chance at the hall, but I wonder if Seahawk fans would be so crazy about the offensive line if they’d replaced him with a guard that was even average at the time. There was enough other talent on that team that I wouldn’t be shocked if they would have still been very successful even without him.
And what Brian said.
It was a weak class at the top in the O-line, but deep
I think this was an at-best-mediocre class for QB, but more so than disliking the class, I disliked the huge rush for them. There’s a ridiculous amount of overdraft, and I’m absolutely ecstatic we didn’t go along with that.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions
It was deep in projects
But not really that great overall. Past the top 3 they are really hopeful projects
It was deep in projects
But not really that great overall. Past the top 3 they are really hopeful projects
I think the right kind of character is important to PC
BMW was fine because he wanted to work.
White was cut because he was lazy.
We passed on Mallet and Smith, when they would have been good value. I’m guessing that there was an attitude issue that PC won’t compromise on.
I like to think of the QB OL relationship as a delicate membrane.
One side of the membrane affects the other.
Hasselbeck's mistakes are almost independent of the line.
"If I had a dollar for every brain you don't have, I'd have one dollar." - Squidward Tentacles
Is it wrong that when watching the highlights of this DB the Saints took,
I was looking to see if he didn’t bite on a double move?
Work hard, play harder, rest easy.
by jwolf0 on Apr 29, 2011 6:53 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Without having UDFA it looks like Seattle wants a lot of bodies in "camp" whenever that is... Just Compete.
I'm a little wary of this attitude.
It feels like the smart kid who coasted with good grades in high school by “winging it”. Then he goes to a good college, and figures he can just “wing” his next exam. The only problem is that he’s not in a high school algebra class- he’s in an advanced physics class at a high-end university.
If Pete was so good at “uncovering gems”, wouldn’t he have found at least one during his three years running the Patriot’s draft?
Look at the Pats now- they don’t “make smart picks”, they simply stockpile so many of them, that some are bound to work out.
I don’t hate the guys we drafted. I just feel that the team was unprepared and didn’t have a good idea of how the draft was going to go. I think they would have been more proactive in getting value from these picks (by drafting guys or trading for future picks).
I disagree on the notion that we were unprepared.
It looks to me like we had a plan, and executed it while grabbing an extra pick and moving up in the later rounds.
I think the fact we couldn't trade down from 25 is somewhat damning.
Carpenter is a nice player, but I don’t think anyone “had a beat” on the guy. I think if the Seahawks had pegged Carpenter as their guy, they would have been much quicker to jump on a deal.
I guess what I’m saying is that I don’t trust Carroll & Schneider’s ability to uncover hidden talent over that of your average NFL team. And at this point, C&S’s opinion (along with Cable, I suppose) of these guys is all we really have to go on. We’ll have to wait and see.
All I can say- considering we took the “safe” route… these guys had better be at least average offensive linemen.
Watching 15+ hours of draft coverage turns my mind into a clusterfuck, and Fieldgulls has become the place where my brain goes to vomit the residue:)
Why don't you think anyone had a beat on him?
How do you know the Steelers or Packers would not have preferred him to the picks they made?
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions
I guess I don't.
And that’s always the ultimate problem I have with watching the draft- the information asymmetry. And ultimately, as I have said before- just about any player that becomes a “good” player is by default a “good” pick. Simply receiving positive affirmation from outside sources feels better, but doesn’t actually tell us anything useful.
Did Pete run the Patriots' draft?
Someone fill me in, I dunno.
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions
That was part of the complaint he had with his first NFL experiences...
that there were too many cooks in the kitchen and his philosophy didn’t gel well with the Front Office. So that makes me think no.
"When Pete first got here he said he wanted to establish the run and stop the run
Pete’s the architect and Cable’s the contractor." --Greetings from the Lord Humongous!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Apr 29, 2011 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions
1999 was along time ago. I also do not believe he had full control back then.
I’m sure he has learned a thing or two.
by Trojan Knight on Apr 29, 2011 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Yep, I think a lot of coaches learn a thing or two during their first go at it.
I don’t really remember what Belichick did in Cleavland as far as the draft goes, but I know it wasn’t what he’s doing now.
I agree with you , but that's what the strategy is starting to look like.
What’s even more amazing is the lack of skill positions they invest in while using this strategy.
But I look at Seattle not investing in a “name” QB like Mallett at the beginning of the draft, is because they don’t want to look like Carolina next year, in a Clausen situation. If they take a developmental qb like McElroy, and then a QB with a high pick next year, a lot less controversy would be involved.
Mallet might be the first QB taken to get a ring.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
And never see the field except from behind a clipboard...
by Trojan Knight on Apr 29, 2011 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Not gonna have time to go through the thread, but FUCK YOU BrianL.
I hate that song to an irrational degree and now it will be stuck in my head.
by thebyron on Apr 29, 2011 7:24 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The best part about drafting all these lineman?
JC running up the seem for a TD instead of missing a block on a defensive end
Interesting that Seahawks and UW missed being able to throw to a TE last season.
Carroll used the TE quite a bit at USC.
by Trojan Knight on Apr 29, 2011 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions
How do you always just beat me?
But yes
Rich Cimini
Kenrick Ellis facing July jury trial for felony assault charge, facing 20 yrs in prison, according to Daily Press in Newport News, Va. #Jets
That is not what you want to hear right after picking him
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Obviously the reason he fell to the late third.
by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2011 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
If any details of those charges were known he would have been a UDFA
Or maybe they know more than us and think it unlikely to stick
by Thomas Beekers on Apr 29, 2011 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





























