The Seahawks' Playbook: Opening Drive in Week 17 Win Over St. Louis, Part II
I started you off in part one with the first two plays from scrimmage the Hawks ran in their opening drive against the Rams Week 17. The first play was a screen pass right that went for 13 yards or so and the second play was a fake screen, which St Louis bit on like they were having a grand-mal seizure. Charlie Whitehurst faked the screen to Golden Tate and threw it up for Ruvell Martin, who was streaking down the sideline wide open. The play went for 60 odd yards and put the Hawks into scoring position.
That brings me to the third play:
(13:57 1st Q) (Shotgun) C.Whitehurst pass short left to J.Forsett to SL 9 for 4 yards (C.Dahl). (1st and 10)
The Seahawks are lined up in a 3 TE set here with Cameron Morrah on the wing left, John Carlson in the slot left, and Chris Baker off the line a step, lined up as the H-back. One thing that stuck me about this game in particular was the use of tight ends on the wing. It seemed like almost every play you'd find John Carlson or Cameron Morrah lined up as a receiver. Anyway, Mike Williams is in the slot to the right and he's flanked by RB Justin Forsett on the right wing.
Before the snap, Forsett motions over and positions himself to Charlie's immediate left. 
The ball is snapped and Forsett runs a flat route towards the sideline. Chris Baker runs a parallel route in front of him, looking for somebody to block. Morrah and Carlson release downfield and look to block their defenders as well.
Carlson and Baker do a decent job finding and holding their blocks as Forsett reels in the pass, looks upfield, slips past Carlson's defender and gets hit hard by the unchecked safety on the play.
Overall not terribly executed and it goes for 4 yards.
At this point, the announcer, Cris Collinsworth notes: "Well, I don't think they're too afraid of letting Charlie Whitehurst play, do you? I mean they come right out, three straight passes, spread out the formation. They're not even going to try and run the football, not that they've had any success. But Pete Carroll's been involved with some big games and he's saying, 'what the heck, let's go fire it downfield.'"
Funny you should say that Cris, because on the next play they do in fact try to run the football. And it's stuffed for a loss of 4 yards, which has now completely negated the gain they made on first down. Which makes it 3rd and 10, awesome. They set up for a pass play and Charlie takes a sack, but due to a flukey defensive holding call against the Rams, the Hawks pick up a First and Goal. Nice.
Now, generally speaking, if you are having difficulty running the ball, which the Seahawks do/were/had, you substitute runs with screens and swing passes to chip away at the defense. Which is exactly what the Seahawks have done and continue to do on this drive.
Next play:
(12:12 1st Quarter) (Shotgun) C.Whitehurst pass short right to G.Tate pushed ob at SL 4 for 3 yards (R.Bartell). 1st and Goal at the 8 yard line.
Seahawks in a 3WR, 1TE, 1RB set with John Carlson lined up to the wing right, Ben Obomanu and Golden Tate in the slot right, and Mike Williams out on the left. I've put a box around Tate, who will be catching a swing pass on this play.
John Carlson motions in the left and form what is basically a trips formation. 
Ball is snapped, it's a bubble screen to Tate:
Carlson and Obomanu set forth finding someone to block and Tate brings in the swing pass. On this particular play, neither Carlson nor Obomanu have much success in their blocks but Tate is shifty enough to pick up a few yards.
This is the kind of play I'd expect to see Golden Tate involved in quite frequently in 2011.
The reason I chose to break down this possession is because, firstly, it was the first possession of the game and thus likely scripted beforehand by the coaching staff, and secondly, it's basically a case-study in how to move the football if you cannot run the ball. It worked for the Seahawks because they game-planned well and executed that game-plan. Obviously, St Louis didn't help themselves on the 61 yard bungle that allowed Ruvell Martin to get wide open, but it was set up by baiting them with what looked to be a plan to use swing passes and dump offs to give an inexperienced QB some confidence. Instead, they went for the gusto on the second play from scrimmage (which I love). If Charlie had been more accurate on the play it could have gone for a TD. Regardless, the Hawks ended up marching the rest of the way down the field and set themselves up for a 2nd and Goal from the four yard line.
In the third part of this mini-series I'll break down the next play, a touchdown pass to Mike Williams.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For some reason, I keep thinking
if it were really that easy, everyone would do it.
I know the Rams had a very below-average defense last year, but we knew by around Week 2 that our run game wasn’t an asset. And acquiring Marshawn Lynch halfway through the season, Beastquake notwithstanding, didn’t do much to help that.
So why didn’t we see more of this game plan before, literally, the last week of the season? We had plenty of short-range and shovel passes, but where was the screen pass in our playbook? Why didn’t we spend our time getting the ball in Golden Tate’s hands to let him work his magic?
I’m wondering if the Ram’s defense was especially vulnerable to a short range passing attack, or if they were seen as especially stout against the run game, to put this kind of strategy into play against them. For all the other 15 games in the season, I don’t want to suggest giving up on the run game, but after 8 or 9 rushes for 20 or so yards, it’s time to rethink you plan.
below average defense last year is incorrect
I’d say we were very average to above average, but meh. I’m not gonna be too pedantic.
The point of this reply is to answer your questions about the run D in that we were INCREDIBLY vulnerable to short dump off passes and screens (watch Rams vs Falcons and Rams at 49ers) due to a lack of athleticism at OLB.
In the run game we are solid up the middle but again due to lack of athleticism at OLB stretch run plays and tosses would burn us for 5 yards consistently, meaning we’d have to bring the safeties down etc.
So in essence, it was good identification of a pretty obvious flaw in our defense and good execution that beat us in this crucial game.
In a side note that big pass play is a prime example of why I don’t feel comfortable having Dahl starting at either safety spot next season, especially because PFF even deconstructed the myth that he is good in run support…
Bradford to Onobun!
Nice, it's cool to have a Rams-centric point of view coming in here to discuss.
Thanks for the insights
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
Vis-a-vis defensive rankings
Saying “incorrect” is off. Both traditional stats (19th in defensive yardage allowed) and 20th in advanced stats puts you guys just south of average
Thanks for the insight on the short passing game. Dunno if I’d put much stock in PFF numbers if I were you.
by Thomas Beekers on Jun 27, 2011 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Infemous - you should check out the "Matt Hasselbeck versus Sam Bradford" debate going on.
I think you will find it amusing.
We didn't use this game plan before the last game of the season
because we were using a different quarterback.

by 








































