Seahawks' Roster By Draft Position
Field Gulls contributor and fellow obsessed Seahawk fan, Davis Hsu, just forwarded me an interesting list that takes a look at the projected Seahawks' roster and the Draft round that each player was taken in. Now, don't get too hung up on the 'projected roster.' We take some liberties with assumed free agent acquisitions and just in general who might make the final 53-man roster, but that's not really the point of the post. More so, we just wanted to get a look at some positional groups and the 'investment,' so to speak, at each spot.
Of course, not all of these players were drafted or acquired under the current regime, but it's interesting nonetheless. A couple of things pop out at you: First off, the O-line (projected O-line) could be made up of three first-rounders, a second rounder, and a third rounder. Not too shabby. That is, of course, assuming that Robert Gallery signs here - something that seems likely but naturally is up in the air at the moment. If he isn't signed, you're still looking at first round book-end tackles, a 2nd round center (or a first round center if Spencer is re-signed), a third round right guard, and a later round left guard. If Chris Spencer is retained and Gallery is signed, you're looking at four first round players on your line, plus John Moffitt. That would be an interesting look.
Anyway, point being: the offensive line has been invested in HEAVILY, or would at least contain very highly drafted players.
The second thing that pops out to me would be the defensive line in stark juxtaposition to the O-line. Again, assumptions have been made here and exclude Brandon Mebane, but outside of Kentwan Balmer, Red Bryant is the highest selected player, chosen in the 4th round. Mebane, if re-signed, would represent a third-rounder, but you're looking at a defensive line made up of very late-round picks and UDFAs. Interesting.
The rest of the positional groups are more balanced, with players represented from all over the draft board, but one other notable position to look at is the cornerback group. Outside of Marcus Trufant and Kelly Jennings, two first-rounders, you've got three middle-round players and a gaggle of undrafted free agents in Brandon Browner, Josh Pinkard, and Roy Lewis. If you look past that and assume that more CBs will be kept to bolster the Bandit package, you'd be looking at 7th rounder Kennard Cox, and UDFAs Jordan Babineaux and Marcus Brown.
Regardless, it's interesting to see just how many late-round players and UDFAs are key players on the Seahawks' roster. Keep that in mind as rookie free agency approaches; players signed may sit on the practice squad for a year or three, but eventually may contribute. Think about the fact that you're allotted 53 men on your roster and during a typical year may get 5-15 players on the Injured Reserve for various reasons. The Seahawks had twelve players on IR at the end of 2010. That leaves a lot of spots open for later-round and UDFA players to make their mark and get a chance to compete their way onto the field, especially on a Pete Carroll run team.
Here's the list:
QB
*Carson Palmer-1 (Matt Hasselbeck-6, Kevin Kolb-2, Kyle Orton- 4)
Charlie Whitehurst-3
Josh Portis/Adam Froman/etc-U
TE
John Carlson-2
Anthony McCoy-6
Cam Morrah-7
WR
Mike Williams-1
Golden Tate-2
Deon Butler-3
Isaiah Stanback-4
Kris Durham-4
Ben Obomanu-7
RB
Marshawn Lynch-1
Chris Henry-2
Leon Washington-4
*Leron McClain-4
Justin Forsett-7
Jameson Konz-7
OL
*Robert Gallery-1
Russell Okung-1
James Carpenter-1
Max Unger-2
John Moffitt-3
Ray Willis-4
Mike Gibson-6
Paul Fanaika-7
Tyler Polumbus-U
DL
Kentwan Balmer-1
Red Bryant-4
Pep Levingston-7
*Raheem Brock-7
Dexter Davis-7
Chris Clemons-U
Colin Cole-U
*Cullen Jenkins-U
*Anthony Gray-U
LB
Aaron Curry-1
Lofa Tatupu-2
KJ Wright-4
Malcolm Smith-7
David Hawthorne-U
S
Earl Thomas-1
Lawyer Milloy-2
Kam Chancellor-5
Mark Legree-5
CB
Marcus Trufant-1
Walter Thurmond-4
Richard Sherman-5
Byron Maxwell-6
Brandon Browner-U (Pinkard-U, Roy Lewis-U, K Jennings-1)
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The speculative nature of this makes it a lot less useful
Would’ve been better after the UDFA/FA period is over, maybe something to return to.
It also seems to be missing a lot of players that as far as I know are under future/reserve contract. Oddly enough it does contain Browner, but not 3rd round TE Dominique Byrd, UDFA FB AJ Schable or 3rd round OG Paul McQuistan. Those are all guys under future contracts AFAIK.
Rotoworld tends to have the most precise roster in this context, even if it does think Chris Carter is 111.
Be interesting to take a stab at where the player SHOULD have been drafted, with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight.
For example, we put Curry lower (say 2nd or 3rd) and Hawthorne perhaps in the 4th. Jennings lower, Mebane higher, that kind of thing.
The point would be to assess the actual talent that has developed/un-developed on the roster.
Or not.
You could actually make it somewhat mathematical be asking your readers where to rank each player, poll-like.
Hawthorne – what round SHOULD he have gone in? Take the average, and voila! We have a fan rating of where we think each player should have been drafted.
I put Hasselbeck in the 2nd, for example.
I'm not sure that makes it mathematical, it makes it very sensitive to perspective
Like Jennings would bottom out into 7th round UDFA like, even though he’s not that bad.
There’s some sites that do this exercise 3 years after a draft, which is p neat. 3 years tends to be the best time to judge a draft, and with so many of our guys not yet having 3 seasons they’re not really in the field where you can judge their careers. Besides, so many of our guys coming in through trades or free agency as PC continues to reinvent the roster.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 3, 2011 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, sensitive to perspective, true. So your 7th for Jennings would balance with me saying, say...
…3rd round for the guy.
Trufant stays in the first
Tatupu stays in the second (border line 1st)
Forsett rises to the 4th (where he should have been drafted anyway, without the need to look back)
Carlson in danger of sinking to the 3rd or lower
Morrah is looking better than a 7th – more like a fifth or 4th
Obomanu more like a 3rd
Butler more like a 3rd without giving up the other picks, although his stock could swiftly fall
Tate too soon to tell, along with Okung (although looking the part of the franchise LT and worth the 1st) and Thomas (also looking the part of a mid-first rounder).
Bryant may prove better then his 4th, but a bit too soon to tell, given his limited starting time
Curry a 2nd
Hawthorne a 4th (although could be higher)
The traded players a more difficult, but let’s try:
Washington for almost nothing (to the Seahawks) worth at least a 3rd, maybe a 2nd
Balmer – the sixth he was traded for, apparently
Cole – solid 4th
Anyway, if you took the average of the actual draft position over the entire team, and then tabulated a fan-based average draft value, it might be interesting. Or maybe you use what a player cost the Seahawks. For example, BMW might be 1 (where he was drafted); FA (what he cost the Seahawks) or say a 2nd (my rating).
Or not.
Forgot Lynch: orignally a 1st rounder; cost the Seahawks a 4th (if memory serves).
I would put a 2nd round grade on him.
After thinking about it...
…I would use the draft pick it cost the Seahawks for a baseline, and for FA signings (with the exception of BMW because he was out of the league) the original round drafted.
And just those on the roster – so we don’t get to rate Hasselbeck, Mebane or Jennings, for example.
I just remembered this about Butler
I remember the Hawks moved up to pick him because they decided they had wanted one of about 8 receivers in that draft, and there was a minirun on the position in the third round. They moved up because they wanted to address the position and were afraid he would be taken off the board. He was a stretch for the extra picks…
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
I like the OL approach.
Many moons ago in my .net days, I was scorned for wishing they would draft OL heavy early (I think I wanted Mack and Unger 1,2) and followed up by a similar FA effort for DL’s. What I wished for the following year was a DL 1,2 draft coupled with similar FA effort on OL. I even said I would repeat something similar to this every year untill it was solved and or people screamed in protest.
Really I believed it would be a two year fix and if done, the skill guys could be had along the way. I was basing this on the longevity of their careers (OL/DL) and the time it takes to gel together, in particular the OL.
So it’s a good start IMO.
,,,a need for speed>>>>
I had thought fixing the OL is the only way to start the rebuild...
first, because it takes a long time for the OL to work cohesively against stunts and blitzes, and second because if your QB has no time, it’s so much more difficult to have that chemistry with the receivers.
Good QB/WR chemistry seems to develop after a preseason/season/preseason so the second season really sees strides in WR production – obviously this is dependent on the QB and WR, but it’s is my general rule used to assess whether it will be a productive pairing.
Put a decent RB behind a line using a blocking scheme he is familiar with and has appropriate skill set for and he will be successful in the first 2-3 games.
In rebuilding a defense, it takes the most time for the secondary to develop unit cohesion, then LBs, and if you have good DL, they can work well together in just a few games.
Seems like Carroll and The Schneid are well on the way in the rebuild. I expect a DL first rounder next year if we find a QB this year through trade or FA, or if Whitehurst seems to be headed in the right direction. Then again, I don’t see these guys reaching for a QB in the first round if they didn’t do it 2 months ago.
Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by 
































