Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

BMW is a Number One Wide Receiver

While watching the Seahawks play Arizona to analyze Deon Butler's play, it was all but impossible not to be distracted Mike Williams. Hasselbeck looked his way early and often, with the third play of our first drive following the short pass to Butler and an incomplete pass to Baker was a beautiful sideline route by BMW, who easily outjumped the Cardinals defender. He would end the game with 11 receptions on 17 targets for 145 yards. Not homerun numbers, but numbers that show him being used often to keep the chains moving, as well as splash plays like the above-mentioned 32 yard reception.

At the end of the Tate article, I noted Mike Williams is "probably too much of a WR/TE tweener to be a WR1". Danny similarly noted in his assessment of our wide receiver depth that BMW strikes him more as a #2 possession guy than a number one, vertical threat. And it's true, the prototype for an NFL wide receiver is a big guy who can - to quote the immortal Randy Moss - "take the ball deep, take the top off the defense". Mike's not that guy, not now and not in the coming season. But how many NFL teams have "that guy" on their roster?

The best example I can think of to argue against the prototypical number one wide receiver is Larry Fitzgerald, generally considered either the best or one of the best wide receivers in the NFL today. Fitzgerald isn't slow, but he's not particularly fast either. He is in many ways a typical possession receiver, but he redefines the position by the quality of his play. He doesn't need to go deep often because of his amazing catch rate, positioning himself well and making catches in seemingly impossible situations. If you think Fitzgerald looks covered, throw it anyway because he's probably not.

Star-divide

BMW is not that player. It's not much of an indictment to say he doesn't match the player with the best hands in football, but it's true Williams' hands are not his strongest suit. He doesn't need them to be. Williams is 6'5 and 235 pounds, which is already a headache for wide receivers, but add to that the fact that he has uncanny body control. That means he's not limited to beating shorter corners with jump balls, it means he can stretch his long limbs every which way with a defender right on him, which gives a quarterback the opportunity to put the ball outside of the defender's range while still easily reachable for Mike Williams.

Mike Williams converted on 59% of his targets in 2010. That's not a bad number and it's not a great number, it's fairly average. And it's not his ceiling. In the Cardinals game, with the offense clicking on all cylinders and Matt Hasselbeck feeling the connection with BMW, the catch rate rises to 64%, with BMW's catches regularly producing a fresh set of downs. Receiver stats are always dependent on quarterback play (more than vice versa). For instance, the Cardinals' insistence that their rotation of straw-filled dummies made for legitimate quarterback play resulted in a sub-par season for Fitzgerald, with a 52% catch rate.

He doesn't run crisp routes but he's not limited in the arsenal of routes available to him. When asked to go deep, he isn't the quickest guy but he is adequately fast once he has a full head of steam. His hands aren't great, most noticeably in 8 drops in his first 9 games, leading the NFL. But that was followed by a streak of drop-free games - until he again dropped a pass against the Saints in the wild card game.

What's more, if you watch the games where he excelled, he generally made the players around him better too. Butler could not make much of the opportunity, but Obomanu's various mid-to-long catches in the Saints game came in situations where he was wide open.

Then consider we're talking about his first season as a serious NFL player. Consider he missed three and a half games which helps explain his tepid numbers, 17Power projecting them out to a full season of 83 receptions for 961 yards and 3 touchdowns. The only worrisome number there is the touchdown numbers, and with no lack of trust in him as a redzone target (13 targets in the redzone according to FFArmory.com) nor a lack of ability making catches in tight spots, I'll consider that more flukey than anything. We're in a lockout off-season so it's harder than usual to get reliable updates on players, but there's no reason right now to doubt BMW's dedication, as he is reported (albeit by himself) as working out up to 6 hours a day. Considered in that light, his numbers are impressive and just a first step along the way as he continues to work hard to improve physically. If the offense in general improves, so should his numbers.

I'm hardly the first to consider this question, and I'd like to take the opportunity to link to 17Power's excellent article on this topic, and thank it for pointing out many numbers I used in these articles. Tomorrow, we're coming back to this to discuss why Mike Williams is not a number one wide receiver.

Comment 19 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great possession receivers don't drop balls as frequently as BMW

and 6’5" 235lb giant WRs shouldn’t get outmuscled by 5’9" DBs. Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad BMW is a part of our team and he’ll probably be our best WR next year, but I wouldn’t say he’s a top-20 WR in the NFL based on his 2010 play.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 5, 2011 9:06 AM PDT reply actions  

This was his first year back,

And the thing that I like best is that he doesn’t act entitled to anything. That was probably his biggest downfall his first go around. I see him continuing to get better this year and next then we can really see what he has.

by spokahawk on Jul 5, 2011 9:47 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

All true

This is an issue of tense. BMW is not a #1 WR but BMW could be a #1 WR, in time.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 5, 2011 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think he'll only get better next year and the year after that etc...

BMW with a little more confidence and the right arm throwing to him is very effective…like spokahawk said, first year back, just got in shape and will be in better shape the upcoming season. He is a rare talent at that size and just the match up problems he causes alone make him a crucial asset to our team. He’s not in the realm of big money number 1’s like Larry and Calvin Johnson but he’s kinda in a class all his own in my opinion. I feel going to him on more 10 to 15 yard slants would help us on 3rd down, all in all much love for my dog BMW…plus BMW is just a dope nickname.

"I was 11 or 12 and Quinton was like 30. He was the only dude on the Pop Warner team who had a full mustache and a beard. And he used to drive to Pop Warner games. You're not supposed to be doing that. It was crazy." -Marshawn Lynch

by IMIN4LIFE on Jul 5, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

QB connection and run game

I think a posession receiver has to have great connection with the QB. They both see the defense the same way and with just a quick signal, it’s on. I don’t put this burden completely on the QB and I think it’s a shared responsibility. They need to be in sync and the QB needs to know the exact window for the reciever.

Another thing that lacked last year was running threat in the redzone. There were no fades in the endzone for BMW to go up and get. There was always a man under as they didn’t respect the running game at all. That and the fact that balls were under thrown for the pattern and the Broncos game exposed it.

Lastly, I think BMW needs to work on his mental toughness just a bit. I think his emotions bring out the best in him (Saints) and the same emotions some times take a toll (Raiders). Emotional consitency is key so the defense doesn’t know they are getting the best of you.

by goatweed on Jul 5, 2011 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wasn't that just an aberration?

‘Cuz one of his better games came against the same back earlier in the season. I feel comfortable chalking it up to fatigue or snow or some other intangible factor. Heck you could even slap “inconsistency” on there, but it’s not as if BMW is weak or something.

Recently engaged! Best. Off-season. Ever.

by Cheddar28 on Jul 6, 2011 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Was WR1 for the peak Holmgren-era offense

Darrell Jackson, or was it Bobby Engram?

Either way, the capabilities are not above WIlliams.

I like that you touch on the question of what defines a #1 WR without nailing it down because it’s tricky. It’s strongly relative. Seems it’s often, take what the guy has shown, compare him to the best of the league. If he doesn’t measure up, “he’s not a true #1.” So the team has a hole on the roster, then.

As all teams have deficiencies somewhere on their roster. When a linebacker is just average, do we say, “he’s not a true linebacker”? Do we say, “that guard’s not a true guard”?

We might if the guy truly should not be starting but the team has no one else. But “starting” is a different vague yet widely recognized superlative, just as “pro bowl” is a vague yet widely recognized superlative. Folks often balk at the use of “pro bowl” to describe a level of play, because it’s not quantified in a meaningful way and there’s wide disagreement on how to define it. But it seems clear to me: generally speaking, a guy who’s among the best at what he does. Not the best, but close to it.

“Starting” is similar. Though it varies, we all share some kind of expectation of level of play for a guy to earn a starting spot. So why, then, does the wideout position entail not just the expectations of being a capable starter but the additional yardstick of the best in the league?

I don’t know. But I don’t endorse it. The Saints could upgrade their receiving corps with a guy who’d instantly be the best of their group, if they targeted that upgrade in the draft or free agency. But they have a very nice corps and they’re probably better served focusing on other units. Williams is good enough to be the best of a very capable receiving corps.

Head of catering.

by jacobstevens on Jul 5, 2011 9:38 AM PDT reply actions  

Another thing that I think works in BMW's favor here is cost.

He is making less than $4 million a year under his current contract compared to the about $10 million Fitzgerald is getting. Number 1 wide receivers are expensive, and if the Hawks are trying to go with a run first offense, then a guy like BMW who is good but not great, but is also cheap might be the perfect number 1 guy as it frees up payroll to bolster the running game which, if successful, can open things up for BMW and make him even better.

by wetzelcoal on Jul 5, 2011 9:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Doesn't have good hands?

I guess I see things differently, I think BMW has some of the best hands I have seen. I was surprised by the number of drops he had during the season. I’m not sure why he dropped so many passes; I think a good part of it was a lack of concentration throughout games. He is a natural hands catcher that snatches the ball out of the air. I didn’t see him drop one pass in the practices that I attended. I think he will be more relaxed in his second season back in the league and he will catch the ball more consistently.

by tom.page on Jul 5, 2011 10:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah I also think he has great hands

I remember the game where BMW caught a pass on back end of the football, so more than half the football had already slipped past his hands, yet he still controlled it. I think I remember seeing that picture in the Fanshots somewhere.

by SeahawksPhan on Jul 5, 2011 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, the hands thing is puzzling.

He made a number of spectacular catches that made him look as good as Fitzgerald on a good day. But he couldn’t do it consistently, and his drops seemed to come at very inopportune times. So he definitely has the POTENTIAL to be a great “hands” guy, he still needs to go out and prove it. And if he does prove it, then his QB will have more confidence, will start giving him opportunities to make the absurd catches that he can make, and the debate of whether he’s a #1 receiver or not will fall by the wayside.

Or he’ll keep dropping passes at critical times, and never reach the potential his highlights imply, and again, the debate about whether he’s a #1 reciever will fall by the wayside. But on the other side of the way…

by Highwatermark on Jul 5, 2011 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

You recognize he has numerous drops

Doesn’t that by definition mean he doesn’t have “the best hands”? Someone who leads the NFL in drops for a long time simply can not be objectively pegged as having “great hands”.

I think his hands are good. They’re not great. They’re not his greatest asset, not compared to his size and body control.

by Thomas Beekers on Jul 5, 2011 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Note

I never said “doesn’t have good hands”. I compared him to Fitzgerald (and other possession receivers by extension) negatively in this sense, and I said they’re not great. They’re not. They’re not a liability either, I’d say they’re “good”, though again it isn’t what the stats show.

by Thomas Beekers on Jul 5, 2011 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

"good hands" isn't exactly a scientific term, I guess.

It could mean that the player can make the occasional great catch, or it could mean he makes a higher number of routine catchers than most players. I’ve seen it used both ways.

Clearly, BMW is more of the former. In my own parlance, I’d say he has great hands, but lousy concentration.

by djafrot on Jul 5, 2011 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

There is no way to quantify what makes a #1 receiver, but my definition is:

A receiver who requires coverage by either a great shutdown corner or demands consistent double teams. The WR must “cost” the defense enough to cover that it creates significant opportunities for other players. The defense then has to make a choice between stopping the #1 and sacrifice defense against the other WRs or against the run, or trying to make a balance between defending all areas, but then sacrificing the advantage to the #1. Fitz makes Doucet, Breaston, and previously Boldin all much better receivers. Ochocinco in his prime made Housh an insanely good receiver, S. Rice made Harvin a much better threat all around before his hip injury, R Moss made Welker incredible statistically before he became incredible on the field, etc.

By my definition, there were several games where BMW was a true #1 receiver, but there were also plays and games where he disappeared. Consistency is the key with BMW, and if he can achieve it, he will be clear #1 feared around the league.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Jul 5, 2011 10:33 PM PDT reply actions  

First (real) season, broken finger(s), several injuries

And pretty good numbers. And a good future. It is easy to statistically show he isn’t a 1 right now, but it is equally difficult to categorize him as a 2.
  Also, I think it was a pretty big adjustment for Seattle’s quarterbacks to know that they can throw it up to a guy who looks covered. Passing it to BMW is about his having position, using his massive pass radius, and not as much about schematic precision.

For 2011. More end zone fade routes. More intestinal fortitude from Seattle’s quarterback. And just maybe a slightly improved running game will give BMW more single coverage opportunities.

by Harvey Manfrengenson on Jul 6, 2011 6:31 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies