BMW is not a Number One Wide Receiver
I like arguing both sides of a point, so to follow up on yesterday's article on how BMW is our potential #1 guy, I'll follow up on why I think he isn't. Remember, these articles stem from the question whether or not calling him "too much of a WR/TE tweener to be a WR1" is fair. It's a debatable point, and I've already shown my hand on where I stand on this, but while writing yesterday's article I almost had myself convinced. I'm just that good a writer. Excuse me while I put my shoulder back in its joint, it just popped out as I was patting myself on the back.
In all seriousness, it's a quality of how good Mike Williams can be. When he's on, as in the Cardinals game, he's really on, making unbelievable plays to secure the football, running his routes well, using his size and strength to his full advantage. When you see a 6'5 wide receiver 30 yards down the field making a jumpball over a Cards cornerback who is right on him, or catch an over-the-shoulder pass while running into the endzone with two Saints defenders on him (great throw by Hasselbeck), it's hard not to think "this looks like a #1 guy." But is that the full story?
I started the last story noting that the prototypical number one wide receiver is not a necessity for every NFL team out there, and it doesn't have to be for us. That said, the reason "possession receiver" in particular is mentioned for Mike Williams is that a possession receiver does not have the full arsenal of a #1 receiver. Either he rarely gets yards after the reception or he never goes deep, instead he acts as a safety valve for the team's offensive attack, getting those few yards when they're most needed and giving the quarterback a steady out. Consistency over flash.
Is that the ceiling of BMW's abilities? No, not really. But it goes a little way to explaining what his limits are. As of right now, BMW only does one thing really well, which is use his body to create situations where only he can catch the ball and the defender can't touch it, provided the quarterback gives him a proper pass. It's an impressive and very useful skill, one that can endear a receiver both to fans and to his quarterback, but it is only one skill.BMW isn't necessarily bad at the rest of the required skillset for an elite receiver, but he doesn't stand out anywhere else. He isn't quick and even his topline speed is nothing more than "decent". He's got good hands, but he doesn't have great hands, and did suffer from the dropsies badly early on. The lack of speed will make many people dismiss him as a WR1 option and I think that's partially valid, as it does limit the contributions he can make as the leading wide receiver. The lack of elite hands may seem a bit nitpicky, but it is a factor in why he is not dependable enough to be a pure possession guy, particularly in some memorable drops when playing the Giants or Bears in the divisional game this last season.
But honestly, the real problem is a combination of flaws in his route running. He doesn't run crisp routes as far as I can tell from game footage. I'm not comparing him to Golden Tate in sloppiness, but it should be noted he's very unreliable here as his concentration seems to wane at times, particularly later in the season, which makes him less dependable as a receiver overall. This isn't as much of a problem if you can create separation by speed or shiftiness, but BMW can do neither, which means he'll very often have to catch the ball in traffic.
The route running problem is exacerbated by a lack of quickness. BMW does not come out of his breaks particularly fast, and he does not change direction particularly fast. And in this case, I'm understating the problem, he's slow as molasses here. If this were fixed, it'd make quite a difference to his level of play as a wide receiver, but I don't think I've heard much of players improving their quickness at his age. And again, this brings a tight end skillset to mind, more than a wide receiver (even a possession one).
Do I think Mike Williams will be our leading receiver this coming season? Yeah, probably. Does that make him a "true #1 receiver"? Well that's a nebulous concept anyway, but I'm going with no, unless he improves on his drop rate (peg it as concentration) and his quickness. It'd be different if he was a rookie, but BMW is a very unusual case in coming back to the NFL as he did, so I find it hard to estimate whether or not he can improve in these fields. For now, we see a wide receiver with significant limitations, who looked a ways away from elite. That in turn means our WR group is far from settled. As it stands right now, WR is a need for us. Not a huge need like defensive line, cornerback, quarterback or left guard, but a need nonetheless. I can certainly live with this group of WRs going into the season if we prioritize one of those other needs. And I'm happy joining the rest of you in being hopeful that BMW will continue getting better and closer to a reliable #1 receiver, but it's not guaranteed based on last year's performance.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
very fair assessment
As far as his athleticism, I consider his size and jumping ability to be elite – there really is no defensive player in the NFL that can get close to the height where he can catch the ball. He is very limited in lateral quickness, acceleration, top end speed compared to the “field” of NFL receivers, and he pretty much has no chance to juke a DB to make him miss. I agree we don’t know if he will be able to improve those weaker areas, but my personal expectation is that he will be significantly more explosive than molasses this year, maybe not TNT, but with his size, if he gains just a bit more quickness and acceleration, then he would have the opportunity to shed one DB before the next one hit him, and that could make him extremely dangerous with YAC.
I would argue that consistency is BMW’s biggest flaw. He can run routes well enough to be considered a reliable route runner, but he doesn’t always do it. He has great (soft and strong) hands, but he doesn’t always watch the ball into them. Sometimes when watching him, I feel like he doesn’t want to be on the field. I don’t think PC will tolerate a similar inconsistency this year.
Last year was his recovery year, from weight gain, from loss of athleticism, from loss of mental fortitude. I think we saw him struggle with lingering effects from those challenges throughout the season. It’s hard to grow while still in recovery, but I have high hopes and best wishes for BMW.
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
No way
He is definitely our best receiver, but he is also definitely not one of the top 20 in this league. He is a decent player with average hands, unique body control, and great size; he can’t get deep without keeping in 7 and he does not get any YAC. Great complementary receiver, but we obviously need somebody who can get deep on time. Until we have that, it’s 8 in the box and 3.5 yards per carry for Lynch.
I would disagree and Im not the only one.
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2010/10/25/1773744/mike-williams-his-potential-and-his-ability
Sure he has not reached that level yet, but Morgan sees him as having one of the highest ceilings to ever wear a Hawks jersey. And I would tend to agree. I mentioned in the post that spurned this discussion that I fully anticipate pro bowl numbers from BMW and I stick by that.
Its all about consistency
BMW had a bunch of amazing plays last year but also had quite a few gut-wrenching drops and wasn’t consistently dependable.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 6, 2011 12:02 PM PDT reply actions
Agreed
But consistency alone would push him into the realm of very dependable and very valuable. That may be a more realistic expectation than hoping he gains quickness and technique to push him into elite.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't necessarily need elite, I just want someone who's a consistent starter.
I’m more worried about who is going to fit on the other side. Personally, I think Obo’s been shorted a little and should be given a shot. Tate just looks to me – at this point – like someone who just might not be versatile enough to fit a starting WR role.
I’m very curious about James Jones, and Sidney Rice of course.
As far as I know Obo's still the starter going into next season, so he should have plenty of opportunity to prove himself
I don’t really expect Tate to push for much time this season. Butler’s injured and abandoned as a starter anyway. Unless we pick up a FA WR, looks like BMW and Obo is our starting duo.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Given the dynamics of PC's approach, I would be surprised if this was the case (BMW and Obo starting WRs)
It wouldn’t surprise me to see one of the other guys step it up and impress PC to the point of displacing one of these two guys.
Not predicting who it might be – only hoping that PC challenges all his players to compete, and awards those who surpass the others with a starting/signficant role.
Not only that, signing a FA WR could change the dynamics.
Jocoby Jones, Malcolm Floyd, Sidney Rice, etc. etc.
It wouldn’t surprise me to see PC target one of the top WR FAs.
That kind of depends on free agency, as I mentioned
I’m not sure who on our roster you think could challenge Obo or BMW. Like I said, Butler’s injured and lost his starting job once already. Durham is a no go. I doubt Tate’s ready for it. Obomanu also suits what PC is looking for in receivers well.
So yeah, as mentioned multiple times, free agency can change the dynamic, depending on what kind of WR we go for and who is our QB (if it’s Hasselbeck, some old WR prospect could well be starting opposite BMW), but with our current roster? I’m not sure where you’re coming from there.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Like I said, not making a prediction - just not assuming that because it turned out that way last year it will again this.
Just like everyone always predicts the superbowl winner as the favorite the next year, when in fact they get beat by the worst team to make the play-offs in history.
Same for predicting who will win the starting jobs at WR for the Seahawks. There is no Larry Fitzgerald or Andre Johnson on the team. As you point out so well, BMW is not currently a top WR in the league. Obo has spent years after being drafted in the 7th round. It is possible (if not likely) that Durham, Tate or Butler beats out one of these guys as the starter.
In any case, I would be willing to bet that BMW and Obo are NOT the starting WRs in the first regular season game. Just too many reasons for something to change.
So you are making a prediction? :P
I kid.
I like your balls man. I’m just not seeing it. Durham really doesn’t look like a contributor, Butler already lost his starting job, isn’t a starter anyway and might start the year on PUP. Tate seems like our best hope out of the current group to push Obo, and it would definitely be a (very pleasant) surprise to me if he did grab the starting job.
Especially with the shortened off-season.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
My real concern? Is that BMW doesn't follow through, doesn't progress like he needs to, and loses his starting edge.
Again, not predicting that will happen – just concerned. I would love to see him take the next step and totally tear it up next year. Obo will be Obo – consistent and capable if not world-beating, but there is something a bit unstable about BMW. We’ll see…
Obo?
I would be shocked if they expect Ben Obomanu to be the starter next year. I think they view Ben as a complimentary player, and special teamer. I expect them to sign one or more vets to come in and compete for the job. I think they expect Obo to get beat out of a starting job.
I feel like I have to keep repeating myself here
I’m not saying Obomanu is a sufficient 2nd WR, I’m saying right now he’s the #2 out of this group and I don’t think he’ll be beat out from the inside. Yes they might look at the FA group. No, they might not get a guy that ends up being good enough. It’s not something we can assume, barring a high-end WR signing which I really hope is not the priority.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions
It's the internet, you have to repeat yourself over and over.
I agree entirely here. There’s no one else on the roster with a rounded enough game to challenge BMW or Obo for a starting position. I’d love for Tate to step up and take that spot, as I think his playmaking ability has a lot of potential, but Obo seems to be able to do everything fairly well and that’s more valuable for your first two guys.
Tate can still get a lot of time out of the slot.
As for a high-end WR signing, I’m down for that as long as it’s someone whose ability is already ahead of what we’ve got.
Agreed as well
And I believe the consistency will come. After taking extended time off I think it is forgivable to not be your sharpest the first season back. With time and work he could show large gains in that area.
I think we can expect some improvement
There was a mention of his age being the reason why he may not get more explosive but I disagree with that. I think it’s rust from not really playing for the past 5 years. If he’s putting in the type of work he says he is then he could become more explosive, at least out of his breaks and the route running can improve too. I think this will be a much better year for him. Of course it would be great to see Sidney Rice out there as our #1 and maybe that will happen with Bevell and the new cap floor but either way I think Mike shows improvement this year.
What is truly amazing about this discussion...
…is that last year at this time any discussion concerning BMW had to do with the odds of his making the team, let alone starting, let alone being the #1 WR on the roster.
And he was in camp with Reggie Williams, on paper a former #1 draft pick who should have had a better chance at all of the above (making the team, etc. etc.)
The fact that PC gave BMW a chance, and the fact that BMW caught ANY passes in the regular season, let alone scoring a TD in the playoffs is nigh miraculous.
Going forward, he’s just another guy, in the sense that its a new season (if its ever a new season) and the position will be full of other players attempting to make their mark. Rookies (Durham), FAs, guys coming back from injury (Butler), 2nd year players attempting to take a sophmore leap (Tate), relative old-timers (Obomanu), and guys we haven’t even considered. Point being, BMW has to make the team again, has to prove himself better than all these other guys in order to see the field.
I say this because I sense (hopefully with good reason) that nobody on the team is entitled, and nobody has a sure starting job yet (outside of maybe Okung, Thomas and Carpenter). We’ll see what BMW brings to camp (should there be a camp) and if he has regressed or improved himself. Right now we don’t know one way or the other.
by Hawksince77 on Jul 6, 2011 12:58 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Awesome point
that I was going to make, if I couldn’t find someone else making it first. He was a zero-risk, give-him-a-shot player who far exceeded expectations. And you’re further correct that going forward he’s just another guy. I don’t think anyone ever expected him to be anyone’s #1 coming into last year…or the year before. He was the #2 Comeback Player of the Year for a reason. Let’s hope he can continue to contribute and increase his consistency.
A great series of write ups. Thanks
I would like to further the discussion about BMW by providing this link http://www.fieldgulls.com/2010/10/25/1773744/mike-williams-his-potential-and-his-ability. Its an assessment from John Morgan who I believe has an amazing eye for scouting. With such a high endorsement from someone I respect so much it’s hard for me not to drink the kool-aid.
Heh, I remembr that piece
Didn’t think to look back at it tho. He and I aren’t that far apart on BMW’s limitations, though some games would follow on that writeup that were a bit more damning about BMW’s flaws.
One thing all my criticism definitely shouldn’t overshadow is that barring a lapse back into the BMWhale, BMW is at the very least a very good and very valuable #2. Considering we didn’t have to invest any picks in him, and considering we got him on a really good contract for the next three years, this is still one of our FO’s better moves so far.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Completely agree
BMW’s nothing like a top-10 NFL WR but he’s the best that we’ve got, is playing for cheap (~1/3 the cost of Brandon Marshall) and didn’t cost any picks. I think there’s certainly room for improving the WR corps but I’m glad BMW is a part of it.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 6, 2011 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Interesting, I also compare him to Brandon Marshall
I would love to hear your thoughts on what separates the two. At this point in their career with all things considered including off the field issues and contract, I choose Mike Williams. Physically I see them in a very similar light.
They had very similar stats last year, BMW is clearly better off the field
and probably has more room to grow, but I think Marshall is probably the better guy right now.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 6, 2011 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
The comparison is indeed pretty apt
Marshall is a lot more consistent though, and doesn’t share BMW’s weakness to the same extent when it comes to speed, tallying a lot more deep catches.
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh and B-Marsh is better with the ball in his hands
I don’t know why BMW doesn’t create much in the way of YAC, but he doesn’t
by Thomas Beekers on Jul 6, 2011 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Detroit fans would argue that BMW is truly awful off the field.
He may have changed, but his past in the NFL was really a mess.
Yeah, I'm assuming he has changed and Marshall hasn't
but he definitely has been a headcase in the past.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 6, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions
He's obviously changed somewhat.
But his late-season slide into inconsistency is a little worrisome.
I think injuries and fatigue may have played a role as well
He probably wasn’t used to the grind of 16 games and experienced the “rookie wall”.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 7, 2011 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Until very recently, the same could have been said about the entire Detroit franchise
Things can and do change
And I would agree on all those points.
And while he is at least a very valuable #2, I also think that if he is able to show improvement on what was essentially a rookie campaign that he could reach a level that no one else on the roster can. All opinions and circumstance, but it sure is fun to think about.
Morgan's scouting?
I thought John had little insight into players. His write-ups were interesting, but he had no clue. Ask Rob Rang how much insight John Morgan had.
by tom.page on Jul 6, 2011 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I guess talent evaluation would be the term I was shooting at.
I think his ability to break down film and evaluate was a real asset and certainly changed a lot of the way I look at football.
Except when he drops the ball in/around the endzone
game after game after game, regardless of which QB is throwing the ball.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jul 7, 2011 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions

by 



































