The Seahawks Roster Rebuild Continues: Will Stacy Andrews Figure Into Pete Carroll, John Schneider and Tom Cable's Plans in 2011?
It seems that the NFL Lockout could mercifully end soon and once that happens teams will be able to finally sign their rookies, make trades, and go out into the free agency market and pick up some key players. During this mad frenzy of activity, there are always a few players that get released due to bloated salaries, injuries, bloated salaries combined with injuries, and/or poor performance. In the next week or two I'll go through and point out some players on other teams that may get released and subsequently could be attractive to the Seahawks, but first I wanted to look a few players that could be on a short list of expendability on Seattle's roster.
Though I don't really think there will be many high-profile releases at this point, - the Hawks are well under the salary cap and did a lot of house-cleaning already last season-, nothing would really surprise me with this front office. The release of LenDale White only a few weeks after trading for him was a surprise. The release of arguably our 'best' wide receiver at the time last season, TJ Houshmandzadeh, came as a surprise to a few as well. With that in mind, let's review a few players and their chances in 2011- first up: G/T Stacy Andrews.
Andrews is due $5.25 million in 2011. He's a true tackle, and that's where he made his money in Cincinnati. He scored 6-year, $38.9 million contract in Philadelphia after playing quite well at right tackle for the Bengals but the Eagles projected him to play guard (apparently without telling him?), which turned out to be a failure. The Seahawks gave up a 2011 7th rounder for Andrews last September, but since coming to the Seahawks he found himself again moved to guard and subsequently relegated to the bench for the most of the later part of the season. He couldn't beat Sean Locklear out for the right tackle position and now James Carpenter has been drafted to play the spot Locklear is vacating in free agency.
It's a bit unclear if he's in the Seahawks plans for this season- they seem to have traded for him with the belief he could work at either guard or tackle but it remains to be seen what they saw from him results-wise last year. In a recent interview, he stated he's down to about 312 (from 342 last season) and has been working to improve his lower body power and strength. His goal is to play at about 320, 325 and as he puts it, "I'm going to be one to reckon with this year!"
Twenty (or thirty) pounds is a pretty significant weight loss and in the ZBS that will be run by Bevell and Cable this season, some added quickness could prove to be beneficial for Andrews. For a weight/height comparison - Andrews stands at 6'7 and would probably be playing at around 325. This is almost identical to Robert Gallery's size (6'7, 325 ... ok, so exactly identical). Other Seahawks in the fray are Mike Gibson (6'3, 298), Chris White (6'2, 295), and Tyler Polumbus (6'8, 300). So really, Andrews' weight loss could be important in his quest to find a starting spot on the Seahawks' roster, most probably at the empty left guard position.
Andrews is now about 2 years removed from an ACL tear to his knee. As most people are beginning to realize, you can come back and "play" about 8-10 months after a tear, but one doesn't really regain full strength and mobility until about two years after surgery. This could have been a huge factor in his play the last two seasons and is something the Seahawks will have to take into account if they indeed have plans to release him.
My guess is that Andrews will be invited to camp and will be given the opportunity to prove his knee is healed and he's ready to compete. It never hurts, as we saw last season, to have quality depth on the line at tackle, and with Russell Okung's ankle and James Carpenter's inexperience, Andrews could find himself on the field in relief.
With the Seahawks (likely) ridiculous amount of cap space, the money he's owed could become less of a problem, depending on how much of a splash they make in free agency. Either way, what happens with Andrews in training camp will be an interesting storyline.
Stay tuned for more on the subject in the next few days.
Follow @FieldGulls on Twitter | Like Field Gulls on Facebook
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
keep Stacy but only if hes willing to redo his contract.
To be honest I never really thought about him as a LG.
Does Cable do a lot of cut blocking in his ZBS ?
And if so , at 6’ 7" how would that work for Andrews, and Gallery for that matter. If anybody has a take on this .
He couldn't beat out Locklear at RT.
Locklear is terrible. I’ve got my money on Gallery coming to Seattle as the LG we sorely need.
Okung/Gallery/Spencer/Moffitt/Carpenter
Although the news lately is that Unger will likely supplant Spencer as starter. Ugh.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
Shut up about Andrew Luck already.
Fan of Spencer...
Not too stoked on the idea of losing him. Is Unger even really better? I didn’t see enough from him to feel that he’s the obvious choice for that position..
Ka-Kaaa!
I'm a Spencer fan as well.
I don’t think we’ve seen enough play from Unger to know for sure, but he was really getting pushed around during his stint at guard.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
Shut up about Andrew Luck already.
by Wayward Llama on Jul 9, 2011 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I think he's gone
It was pretty telling that Andrews was inactive for last few games last year. Locklear is not my favorite player, but to be fair, Sean is a very good pass blocker. Andrew’s strength is run blocking which is Locklear’s weakness. I thought they would play Andrews at RT so we could run the ball better. Coach Carroll didn’t do that. I think the actions of last season prove they aren’t interested in Andrews. I think is he cut prior to camp.
Why wasn't he already cut, like Chris Baker?
Not that I think you’re wrong here – there’s a good chance he’s not back. But it’s weird they’d cut guys like Nate Davis and Chris Baker but let Andrews hang
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
Maybe because of the lack of depth on the line
they kept him for the season. In my opinion, if he couldn’t out-play Locklear, Gibson, or Polumbus, then he’s not worth keeping around.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
Shut up about Andrew Luck already.
by Wayward Llama on Jul 9, 2011 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions
But, they've changed up philosphy.
Now they want to run. New OC + Cable and Pete talking run run run.
I think he’ll be around.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
That's what Pete's wanted from the beginning.
That would be why he hired the biggest name in line coaching, Alex Gibbs.
Doesn't cable like super tall O lineman?
maybe cable thinks he fits the right mold for his scheme
Yeah - and that was my point with the Gallery/Andrews height/weight comparison
He is the same size as gallery so the idea that he’s too tall might not matter to Cable.
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
how many backup tackles are there usually?
2 or 3 right? I would rather have Polumbus and Willis on the roster than andrews. I guess I would rather have Locklear too, but hopefully they can bring in someone who gets cut or something and give them a shot. Wouldn’t hurt
I've got high hopes for our line this year.
I like how Mora got skewered for saying we need more dirt bags, and I like how Pete didn’t say shit. He just went out and got more dirt bags. Starting with Cable as head dirt bag in charge.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
My ideal line...
LT: Okung
LG: Gallery
C: Spencer
RG: Willis
RT: Carpenter
Bench: Polumbus, Moffitt, Andrews, Unger
Is nine OL too many?
I really hope they keep Polumbus, he was solid depth at LT and versitile enough to play all but C.
I have high hopes for Moffitt, but I’d rather only one rookie on the line and with Gallery and a healty Willis, I don’t see him breaking through quite yet.
As the case was made in the article, a healthy Andrews could have a solid comeback at his natural position and could even supplant a green Carpenter.
Unger, meh, but I don’t know who else would be our back up C.
I’m curious about the lineman brought in from GB last year, I don’t they made it off of the PS last year, but I’m obviously Schneider saw enough in them to bring them over from one program to the next.
People keep repeating that Andrews was really good in 2008
evidently because he made the pro-bowl and got a big deal from Philly following that season.
He surrendered 9.5 sacks in 15 games, people, 2nd most among right tackles in the league that year.
Throw out his much publicized contract year accolades, and you are left with a very average RT.
by Harvey Manfrengenson on Jul 10, 2011 6:24 AM PDT reply actions
Yeah, I read a lot of bad things about Andrews in the Eagles blogs after we traded for him.
His acquisition never excited me.
Offseason 2011: Kelly Jennings, Craig Terrill, and Matt Hasselbeck...good riddance.
Shut up about Andrew Luck already.
by Wayward Llama on Jul 10, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Roster churn until the line works smooth as butter
Who knows what this FO will do, except to put everyone out there in as many combinations as possible and see what sticks.
My ideal OL is one that run blocks well and pass blocks well… If its 5 first and second year green players, so be it. If somehow it ends up including Locklear, Andrews, Spencer, and some other retread – as long as it protects the QB and prevents are RBs from dodging/breaking tackles 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage I’ll be happy. After the Holmgren reliance on veterans (at the expense of playing time for superior but young players) and the Mora lack of imagination (coaching to not lose his job), I find it refreshing to have coaching that actually tries to figure out what works best on the field.
Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by 































