The Seahawks Replay Booth: Alan Branch "Tore Us Up"
Though I'm sure one game didn't dictate the Seahawks' decision to aggressively pursue DT/DE Alan Branch in free agency, Week 7's matchup with the Cardinals definitely left an impression on the Hawks' coaching staff. Branch had a hell of a game against the Seahawks in Week 7, notching five tackles, two sacks, and a forced fumble. Pete Carroll acknowledged this while explaining why they wanted him so badly, noting, "Alan Branch was a really important guy to get. He tore us up last year. He is a guy that has not been maybe recognized yet and we're hoping to bring him out. He's one of those guys that needs to emerge into the talent level and the potential that he has. Hopefully we're going to be able to do that and he'll help us."
Like Carroll noted, Branch is a guy that needs to live up to his potential -- he was the 33rd pick in the 2007 draft out of Michigan but more or less busted in Arizona, starting only three games in four seasons there (all in 2010). He has played at the nose tackle position, the undertackle position, and even the defensive end spot so he's a scheme versatile guy that can be plugged in at different spots and in different situations. Whether Pete can bring out that potential is another question, but Branch has got the physical makeup to have some success in the Seahawks' system.
At 6'6, 338 he's definitely big enough to play on the interior of the line, and that's where the Seahawks have announced he'll be starting. He'll be next to Mebane at the 3-tech position for the most part, and he's done enough 2-gapping to play on the outside as the 5-tech if called upon to do so. Let's take a look at some of the reasons he may have been on the Seahawks radar this offseason -- the Seahawks' Week 7 matchup with the Cardinals, and I'll review three plays in particular.
(8:14 1st Q) M.Lynch left tackle to ARZ 4 for -2 yards (A.Branch). 3rd and Goal
On this play you see the Hawks in their goal-line set with three tight ends, Michael Robinson at fullback, and Marshawn Lynch at tail back. John Carlson goes in motion to the left, and the ball is snapped. Alan Branch has a box around him, and he's playing the 3-tech, shading the weakside guard. (after the jump...)
You can see Mike Robinson leading the way here below, and Matt Hasselbeck is about to hand it off to Marshawn Lynch. I've boxed where Branch has made his penetration. It's either a total miscommunication on assignments by the Seahawks, of just a slow get-off by Locklear, but Branch knifes through the line virtually untouched.

Below, you can see Lynch about to take the handoff but Alan Branch is already almost upon him. The play is already blown up by the quick penetration by Branch.
Yeesh.
(5:02 1st Q) (Shotgun) M.Hasselbeck sacked at SEA 42 for -6 yards (A.Branch). FUMBLES (A.Branch) [A.Branch], RECOVERED by ARZ-D.Dockett at SEA 45. D.Dockett to SEA 45 for no gain (S.Andrews). 3rd and 10
You can see below that the Seahawks are lined up in a 3WR set with Carlson and Forsett lined up on either side of Matt Hasselbeck. Unfortunately neither one of them helps out much on this play. Branch is the DE lined up at the bottom of your screen, or on the left side of the defense. It's a 3rd and 10 situation, which helps Branch in this case because he doesn't have to worry about the run as much, but regardless, he gets a good jump off the snap and easily beats Sean Locklear.
Here you can see Branch making the turn and displaying pretty impressive balance off the edge. This type of lean is associated with Robert Mathis and Dwight Freeney types when speed rushing from the defensive end spot but for a 338 pound guy to do anything resembling that, it's pretty cool.
He never sees Branch coming. In Locklear's defense, not that he really deserves much here, Hasselbeck held on to the ball a tic or two too long, then failed to see the pressure coming, and failed to step up into the pocket. Branch strip sacks Hass and the Cardinals recover the football.
(:57 3rd Q) (Shotgun) M.Hasselbeck pass incomplete short middle to J.Carlson [A.Branch]. 3rd and Goal
Another third down situation where Branch made a difference (and the second third and goal I've shown here). Hawks in a three receiver set with Forsett lined up next to Hasselbeck. Branch is lined up as a 3-tech, shading the weakside guard, and LB Joey Porter is to his right on the edge.
You can see on the snap that Forsett releases left into the flats as a check down option for Hasselbeck. I've placed a box around Alan Branch and linebacker Joey Porter, and pictured you can see Porter stunting under Branch as Branch gets a good push on LT Tyler Polumbus.
Below, you can see that LG Mike Gibson has picked up Porter quite well but Polumbus isn't having an easy time with Branch. Branch is into him and Polumbus is unable to anchor on this play.
Above you can see Branch essentially just push Polumbus back and again, Matt Hasselbeck has held onto the ball for much too long. At this point, you would have liked to have seen him throw the ball away.
Too late. Branch is upon him. Hasselbeck sort of throws it down the seam to John Carlson but it only gets about half-way there. I hate to point out mistakes by Polumbus because I feel like he did a pretty decent job last season filling in for Okung at left tackle, but this time the bullrush by Branch was too much.
Branch had one more sack in this game as well but I think you can see why the Hawks liked the guy. He didn't really perform consistently the rest of the season, but if Carroll and co can get him to perform like he did against us last season, we could be in good shape.
More realistically, I think you can hope to see Branch on the field in passing downs, much like he was used against the Seahawks in Week 7, trying to get into the backfield and generally being disruptive.
Follow @FieldGulls on Twitter | Like Field Gulls on Facebook
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So Branches three good plays came on the following:
1. An o-line miscommunication + Locklear sucking (shocker)
2. Locklear sucking + Hass holding the ball for a tad too long
3. Polumbus sucking (which happens more often than not)
This is a fantastic breakdown, Danny, but it gives us reason to worry.
In these three plays, Branch’s successes didn’t come against stout pass or run game protection, but against breakdowns and bad players. Color me worried.
Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.
Locklear did suck in run blocking but was decent in pass pro, if you follow Pro Football Focus' game-tracking.
a 338 lb guy beating Locklear on the edge is impressive. (Even though we love to hate on Locklear). The takeaway is that he overpowered Polumbus (who I don’t think sucks more often than not) from the 3-tech spot, was quick enough to get inside on the blown assignment, and he beat locklear off the edge.
You can’t immediately discount the players he did it against, but I see your point. It’s why he only started 3 games. And it’s why you should be a little worried. But the idea is that Carroll thinks they can use his skillset well (kind of like they did with Chris Clemons last year). Carroll takes pride in fitting players into spots where their strengths can be used. Let’s hope that works with Branch.
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
Misfit said it best below - he performed well against replacement-level players
I’m not trying to completely discount what he did. He’s quick for as big as he is and he was able to make use of that quickness.
I’m simply hoping you’re right – he will be utilized to fit his set of talents and I hope he can capitalize. I can’t say that I’m optimistic, but I am hopeful. The next few pre-season games (where starters will play more time, and schemes will slowly develop past vanilla) will be very telling.
Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.
Yeah - will be interesting to watch.
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
by Danny Kelly on Aug 15, 2011 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Very valid
Polumbus is a high-end backup and while Locklear had a decent pass protection year he was still prone to mistakes.
Alan flashed skills but I wouldn’t give it much more credit than Merriman’s performance versus the Bears.
I don’t know what our FO saw in Branch. I still don’t. That’s not to say it’s a mistake, it just means we’re not in a good position to analyse it. Kinda like the Whitehurst pickup.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Aug 15, 2011 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions
Locklear asleep is hilarious (though not at the time).
Branch shows power and penetration while being as stout as one could expect. Now, similar to what Nick said above: I think the players Branch capitalized on are replacement-level types (at best), but we still saw the ability from Branch that had me very excited upon the signing.
I remember Branch last year and the trouble he gave us, and it’s cool to see it in this detail – esp. the film zooms and boxing. Nice work.
Curious if more of this will be done or if there is enough to further investigate Branch’s starts, even vs. other teams? Perhaps against some higher-quality linemen.
All that said I love strengthening our D-line while simultaneously weakening a division rival. I love that! Now, about Calais Campbell….
2011: Building the Trenches.
Branch tore up one game last year and was virtually invisible against everyone else.
He has a ways to go to convince me.
http://17power.blogspot.com
Same here.
The Carroll quote points to the fact they think they can get more out of him than the Cardinals did. Hopefully he’s right.
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
by Danny Kelly on Aug 15, 2011 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Max Hall won the game. Obviously.
Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.
by Nick Andron on Aug 15, 2011 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions
alan branch just did a nice interview on kjr 950 at 12:10 or so...
talked about returning punts in high school when he was 6’5" and 315lbs… had a pretty funny line saying he offers to return punts to all his special teams coordinators and guarantees at least a 10 yard return – “those little fast guys aren’t bringing me down, I’d get at least 10 yards every time”
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
Branch is Interesting
Simply because he is SO big. And it’s not "extra football’ weight.
Dude has always been big, from day one.
I hope they have a plan for this guy, or just give him the right push.
He reminds me of Balmer a little bit, to where he seemed uninterested at times.
Here’s to hope that Carroll is the Anti-Wis and gets the most out of him.
I salivate every time I watch his college highlights.
Win Forever: Live, Work and Play Like a Champion
My question, sort of echoed by others...
…is why did he look so good vs. the Seahawks and did nothing vs. everyone else? Was it really just going against 2 semi-crappy tackles and being “motivated” for some reason? I have to think there were other games in which Branch was motivated last year; it’s not like he had some simmering hatred/love for the Seahawks. And as bad as Locklear has been and that Polumbus was a fill-in, those guys aren’t high-schoolers, they’re NFL players.
I’m not trying to come to any conclusion here, positive or negative. Maybe there was some specific matchup issue, like the size deal with Polumbus, that made him do so well. If that’s the case, I’m actually pretty heartened by the nature of the signing, as it looks as though PC is filling the line with guys of lots of different shapes and sizes for lots of different situations. At the same time, I can’t get away from that fear that he’ll just play well when he feels like it.
Yeah, that's worrisome. Attitude and mental toughness will be something to watch for.
Proactive-like-Nonstop
FIELDGULLS
Looking forward to playing Locklear and the Redskins.
November 27. Mark your calendars.
by Suburban Shocker on Aug 15, 2011 3:14 PM PDT reply actions
I've always felt Branch was mis-cast in a 34 defense.
I thought as a prospect he would make a decent or good 43 tackle. Perhaps he will be Colin Cole with slightly more pass-rush, in which case is good.
2011: Building the Trenches.

by 












































