Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

In Defense of Kelly Jennings (?)

DK Edit: Good first fanpost here and another excellent look at Kelly Jennings' play against the Chargers. Thomas did a great post on this as well here that you may want to re-visit. 

There were two stand out plays on San Diego's opening drive where the Seahawks defense missed opportunities to stall Philip Rivers' alpha-male touchdown dreams. Both of these plays were the result of mistakes made by individual Seahawks failing to execute on solid defensive play calling. Um, yeah, no shit, right? Well here's the surprising part: none of these players was Kelly Jennings. Sure, the Chargers' receivers ended up in Jennings' vicinity at the end of each play, with our much maligned CB making the tackles after the damage had already been done, but after watching the game again last night and analyzing each of these key snaps, I simply cannot fault our de-facto number two cornerback.

Please forgive my lack of detail in advance. My wife erased the game from the DVR to make space for more reality TV. As a result, I am not able to mention certain players by name and specific yardages, downs, etc. will be vague. I did however watch these two snaps in slo-mo quite a few times, so I have a pretty good feel for what actually went on.

The first play in question resulted in that deep ball reception by Vincent Jackson that we all know and love so well. Kelly Jennings is matched up with VJ on the left. This is already a huge problem for the Seahawks, especially if you're a regular here at Field Gulls and take for granted that Kelly Jennings is terrible. Still, as the play progresses, our alien-headed CB manages to stay with Jackson step for step in under coverage. Yet it makes no difference, since Jackson ends up lunging forward to catch a 48 yard pass that Charger dreams are made of.

On the surface, we might ask ourselves why Jennings was unable to make a play for the ball. The easy answer is, "Because he is Kelly Jennings and he has no ball skills!" I would argue that the actual answer is because Philip Rivers saw the mismatch and threw a perfect pass that Vincent Jackson was forced to lean forward to snag, thus rendering the shorter Jennings unable to break up the play, assuming a lack of Go-Go Gadget arms.

So why was Jennings in under coverage and not playing the over? Short answer: he was supposed to have help. San Diego had three receivers, two deep on the wings and one up the middle on a slant. I am not 100% sure of who was playing strong and free safety on this play, so I will call them safety RIGHT and safety LEFT, with directions from the point of view of the offense.

Safety RIGHT bites on the outside route already covered by CB Marcus Trufant. Safety LEFT sees this and scrambles to cover the middle receiver, getting there in time to (mostly) do just that. Even as RIGHT realizes his mistake, the ball is in the air. It was mildly amusing to watch both players perform the body language equivalent of saying "Oh Balls!" as they veered toward the left sideline, hoping for a miracle.

As we all know, Kelly Jennings cannot cover Vincent Jackson alone, especially on a deep route where he is supposed to have help. The fault lies with safety RIGHT for not covering his man in the middle and allowing safety LEFT to do his job of helping the CB. This would have forced Philip Rivers to thread the needle in double coverage or, more likely, take a sack. (Watching the line on this play, I am convinced that if that had been Sean Locklear playing right tackle for San Diego, there would have been a holding call. The DE was that close…)  

Star-divide

The second play in question in this drive was on 3rd and 11, on the Seattle 38. Seattle had just made a nice play against the run, with Kam Chancellor stuffing Mike Tolbert for a one yard loss after the initial contact by Aaron Curry. We were smelling that familiar, bittersweet aroma of another bend-but-don't-break style defensive victory.

And then there was Philip Rivers. San Diego lines up in what looks like a two tight end set, with TE Kory Sperry on the line between the right tackle and right guard, the other set as a blocking receiver on the near left wing. Actually, it is the RB Mike Tolbert who is lined up on the wing, and I'm not going to guess what this formation is called. 

Philip Rivers sees something he likes and calls an audible, setting Mike Tolbert in motion ending up adjacent to Sperry directly behind the line. After the snap, the 'Hawks drop back in coverage but still manage to get a bit of pressure on the QB. It's all for naught however, because the rest of the world now sees what Philip Rivers just saw: Raheem Brock trying to cover the slot. Brock hesitates for a split second, which is enough to allow the TE who was originally on the line to run a quick slant to the inside. Brock is too far back and gets burned further by being slow as hell to get to his man.

Tolbert, who was set in motion, ended up blocking, but judging by Brock's body language, he was already mentally committed to covering "that guy." Deer-in-the-headlights plus not that fast to begin with equals failure. The end result was a gain of 16 yards for the San Diego offense.

The rest of the play was well covered by the Seahawks, which is part of the reason why it took so long for help to arrive near the sidelines. The name of that help was Kelly Jennings and he is maybe, just maybe, not as bad as I thought he was.

When I first watched this game at full speed, these two plays appeared to my untrained eye to be the result of poor play by Jennings. This is not only due to my lack of real expertise in football analysis, but also on the amount of negative press he gets around Field Gulls, my number one source for Seahawks news and opinions. I realize now that my preconceived notions about his caliber of play have led me to blame the guy for an unfair proportion of our pass coverage woes. Is he an above average cornerback? No, most would say not. But he stays healthy, does not draw penalties, and, as far as I can tell from last week's game, does what is asked of him. Small sample size, I know, but hey, it's my first post.

(Critical feedback is welcome. I've never written about football, so please be gentle.)

Comment 57 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Jennings' problems aren't in coverage or assignment error.

He just can’t defend a pass. I think it has a lot to with the fact that he’s so intent on staying with his man that he’s oblivious to the ball.

by Groundhog on Aug 16, 2011 1:30 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

defending the ball has a lot to do with size

smaller players front bigger players all the time in basketball – but only make plays on the ball if the pass is poorly thrown. Such defenses rely on trap help from the weak side to prevent easy scores on well executed passes – but it doesn’t always matter. The offense can take advantage of the size mismatch more often than not.

Ditto for NFL corners – and with Jackson being “fronted” by the smaller Jennings – a completion was simply a matter of a well executed pass – something well within the skill set of Rivers. Better help may have prevented the completion, but the ‘Hawks are likely better served matching Jennings up with slot receivers that do not bring the inherent mismatch of the V. Jacksons’ of the NFL.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Aug 16, 2011 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I might point out that Jennings was relying on a safety that was out of place.

Jennings did his job the safety was supposed to be over the top even the commentator commented that the safety was out of place. That catch by Jackson was not Jennings fault Rivers looked off the safety and then allyooped it to his power forward.

by Sharoten on Aug 19, 2011 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I might like Jennings as a Nickel back playing the slot WR.

But any athletic WR over 6’2" (2/3 of the receivers in our division) will win a jump ball/well placed throw.

by banksta3 on Aug 16, 2011 1:41 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

And really there are 5-10 CB's with both the size/speed/skill combo to

Defend a well placed ball to VJ without a Safety over-the-top, & those that can are still 50/50 at best. Jennings is not on that Short list.

by banksta3 on Aug 16, 2011 1:45 PM PDT reply actions  

He always could cover

That why he was taken in the first round, he just can’t ever get to the ball. I saw plays last year where he was in prime position to knock the ball away but just didn’t/couldn’t. If you look closely he is always within a step of his man

by Bluehawk17 on Aug 16, 2011 1:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Jennings

Who really cares if he is giving the guy a “hug” while the ball is being thrown if he cant stop the dude from catching it. So is the point that someone who should have been tall enough to knock down the ball been in the area Jennings takes his height and grows 5 inchs. It doesnt matter what technique Jennings uses he is not stopping Vincent Jackson from catching the ball on any throw isnt the point of a corner to be able to stop a pass from being completed not be in his correct area and fall on the receivers knees so no more damage is done… I am done with Jennings there is no defense for him being a 1st or 2nd option at cornerback.

by Jazzercise! on Aug 16, 2011 2:14 PM PDT reply actions  

As soon as we find someone to replace him, I am all about it.

My point is more about how we seem to blame him for every completion on his side of the field. I am guilty of it myself, but as I analyzed last week’s game I realized he is a pretty good football player who has no business covering a number one receiver like Vincent Jackson. He is nothing if not reliable. He will reliably cover his man and reliably be mediocre as he does it. This might be the reason why he’s hung around for so long.

And yeah, he seems to never play the ball. But on that VJ play, there was no chance to play the ball given his assignment and River’s pass placement…

(And hey Danny, thanks for putting this up.)

by scorpiknox on Aug 16, 2011 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

The thing about true #1 WRs is that they're seldom successfully covered by single CBs

Sure, there are guys like Nnamdi or Revis, but very few teams have players that can shut down those guys 1-on-1. You’re typically going to want extra coverage from other DBs to cover your Vincent Jacksons or Andre Johnsons.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 16, 2011 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

His positioning on plays is overrated

for me in an argument to say that is what he is good at doesnt somehow negate the completion or hinder the offenses ability to run a play, the yards and statistics bear the proof of the burden of Jennings we have other options like Browner or Maxwell I would rather sink or swim with them out of position but still be able to deflect and interrupt passes, while they learn instead of the human gnat.

by Jazzercise! on Aug 16, 2011 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which is why he's slated to play nickel

He’s not a great CB but he definitely gets more flak than he deserves. There are maybe 3 CBs in the league that can line up one on one with VJackson and none of them are coming to Seattle.

by zifnab32 on Aug 16, 2011 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it was Pinkard

The play is on highlights of the game.

by quelly on Aug 16, 2011 2:15 PM PDT reply actions  

It was Pinkard

The people involved in the plays are identified in my writeup, for the curious

Formerly Known As Vasilii

by Thomas Beekers on Aug 16, 2011 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Chargers were very clearly attacking Jennings.

He is terrible as a CB. Teams know it and fans know it. Time for him to switch positions or leave Seattle.

by Wilder. on Aug 16, 2011 2:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I disagree about the Chargers "very clearly targeting Jennings."

Philip Rivers was targeting a blown assignment (via Josh Pinkard) on a play that called for a double team. Simple as that. Jennings was not singled out otherwise on that drive.

Leroy Hill allowed the TD by getting a horrible jump on the reciever. Jennings was all over his man and came into help at the goal line. That he is way too small to do so is certainly a problem…but I digress.

(I can’t believe I am actually still defending one of my least favorite players.)

by scorpiknox on Aug 16, 2011 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Nobody wants your "evidence" or "nuance"

There are good players and there are bad players, there is no in-between. Jennings is clearly a bad player

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 16, 2011 2:25 PM PDT reply actions   3 recs

Oops, didn't mean to post that.

Should have included more about how Jennings is a goat and it defeats the purpose of a goat to try to defend it from blame.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 16, 2011 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I knew you were messing around regardless.

So how long until TJax is the new goat apparent?

by scorpiknox on Aug 16, 2011 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've had low expectations for TJax for as long as he's been here

but I’m not ready to jump all over the guy after a couple of bad series with a cast of new receivers and a week of practice.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 16, 2011 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

We all live in hope that Thurmond will be starting at CB#2

PC isn’t the kind of guy to keep dead weight around so hopefully he sees Jennings as a guy that’s been an overmatched starter with the potential to be a useful nickel. Nice post as well by the way, takes balls of steel to pop your cherry with a “Kelly Jennings is actually a swell guy” message on this site.

by ciarannh on Aug 16, 2011 4:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Thurmond's injured right now

That’s the only reason why Jennings is taking snaps at CB2.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 16, 2011 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do not understand why we have people coming out of the woodwork

defending Kelly Jennings. A player that is a major reason why the Seahawks secondary performs so poorly. It is very doubtful any experienced QB is afraid to throw at Kelly Jennings even when he is draped all over the receiver.

Jennings can’t play man to man well because he can’t jam or make a play on the ball. He can’t play zone well because he can’t make a play on the ball. He doesn’t play nickel well because he can’t make a play on the ball. He’s not good at playing the run because he is too small. He is a huge liability on the field that needs to eliminated from Seattle.

If he had any kind of skills, another team would have signed him. We have drafted poorly at CB and other teams are letting us know we drafted by poorly and don’t even want to sign our ex-CBs even when they are a bargain. I hope Jennings is gone by the start of the seasons. I can’t watch Kelly “Burnt Toast” Jennings on the field any longer.

by A. Simmons on Aug 16, 2011 4:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Found it after a bit, per Danny O'Neil:

“Jennings had multi-year offers elsewhere, and he chose to take a one-year deal from the Seattle Seahawks. That makes it incredibly unlikely he would take this deal if he was at risk of not making this team.”

Uh, I find that confusing. One year here? Why not take the multi-year deal?

by scorpiknox on Aug 16, 2011 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because he hates us

and wants to subject us to another year of Kelly Jennings.

by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 16, 2011 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

Probably got more guaranteed money from Seattle

The length of the contract doesn’t matter if you can get cut anytime.

by Nshima on Aug 16, 2011 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Your ire and criticism are raised at Kelly Jennings, the outmatched starter

Not Kelly Jennings, the rotational nickel guy.

Formerly Known As Vasilii

by Thomas Beekers on Aug 16, 2011 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I think Jennings is clearly a professional who belongs in the NFL and I am glad the Seahawks signed him. I am also frustrated when more physical receivers essentially play through him to the ball; but, in the rush to get monster CBs there is a place on the team for the smaller CB to cope with the Wes Welkers of the world.

by moxr on Aug 16, 2011 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone else do a double take

at the irony of “Kelly Jennings” and “defense” in the same sentence?

Eddie Izzard ran 43 marathons in 51 days with 5 weeks of training. What's stopping you?

by rex92 on Aug 16, 2011 5:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Well

they're nearly synonymous

2011: Building the Trenches.

by Misfit74 on Aug 16, 2011 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great post

Rec’d.

KJ might not be a very good starting CB in the NFL but once a fan base smells blood in the water it can easily get out of hand. Props to scorpiknox for taking a step n the other direction.

Confuscius say- "Baseball wrong. Man with four balls cannot walk."

by Outside Contain on Aug 17, 2011 3:18 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't think anyone would diagree that he was supposed to have help.

The problem is that he always requires it…

Someone said he got picked on, and rightfully, it was pointed out that Rivers was picking on a blown assignment.

Trouble is, there are other corners in the league who, blown help or not, would have at least had a chance to stop that pass.

The fact is, Jennings does get picked on, always has, because whether he is there blanketing the reciever or not, doesn’t actually matter, since he can be as close as a recievers shadow, but he’s no more effective than the shadow at stopping the pass.

If you have a corner that is usually in a position to make a play, but never makes one and always requires over the top help, then that corner is basically useless.

QB’s all know that when everyone looks covered, just throw it whoever Jennings is covering because it’s as close to an automatic first down as there is in the league.

So yeah, he runs well, and misses his assignment less than the other guys in our secondary tend to, but even so, he’s not much more effective in coverage than the recievers shadow.

So what’s the point of Kelly Jennings? He’s as close to completely useless as it gets.

by fargomonkey on Aug 17, 2011 6:25 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

There are only a small handfull of CBs who have the ability to influence the outcome of that particular play any different than he did

and there are lots of CBs who wouldn’t have recovered well enough to make the tackle.

Jennings isn’t great, but he isn’t that much worse than an average CB in the league. He just isn’t elite or even really good, which is what he was drafted to be.

by stufr on Aug 17, 2011 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

This is starting to get ridiculous.

If Kelly Jennings was so terrible, he would not be the starting CB under 3 separate coaching staffs. That may sound like an appeal to authority but I’m pretty sure that between Holmgren’s staff, Mora’s staff, and Carroll’s staff; one of them would have sat him if he was really as awful as everyone says.

Jennings is not good but can we spare the hyperbole? There are cornerbacks in the NFL that are much worse. Let’s try to be rational.

by Hopefulmsfan on Aug 19, 2011 2:44 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

And just so you know fargo, this is not just directed at you.

It’s to everybody who exaggerates the terribleness of Kelly Jennings.

by Hopefulmsfan on Aug 19, 2011 2:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lets face it, when you combine a good receiver

with a perfectly thrown pass, there is very little that a defender can do to stop it. Certainly no CB on the Seahawks could have prevented that pass to VJ, not without help. And if Jennings had gotten safety help, then Tru would have been 1 on 1 with his guy, and a similarly perfect pass likely would have been successful (or, since it was true, PI would have been called because Tru was close enough that he could have interfered with the receiver, which means that he DID interfere if you’re an NFL ref).

There are a lot of reasons to look down on Jennings, but that play wasn’t really one of them. He is a liability, and opposing QB’s know to throw it his way as often as they can. It would be GREAT to replace him, but ONLY if there’s someone better taking his place. I have to trust the coaching staff on that call, since I am pretty sure they know more about CB play that I do. I am also pretty sure that the coaching staff wants to win a lot of games, and will likely put the best guys on the field. So if Jennings is the starter when the season begins, that probably means he gives us the best chance of winning. Or that the coaching staff are idiots. One or the other.

by Highwatermark on Aug 17, 2011 7:41 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I was thinking about this last night and...

I came to the realization that while I understand that we shouldn’t just jump to put the blame on Jennings, my main problem is that I don’t want to have excuses made for the players. I JUST DON’T WANT TO HEAR IT. An actual good corner wouldn’t be like “where is my help” he would say “shit those rookie safties are screwing up their coverage I gotta make a play”

by SeafaninBerkeley on Aug 17, 2011 8:58 PM PDT reply actions  

No a good corner would absolutely say "where is my help"

If he knew that there wasn’t any help then he would have played it differently from the beginning. Which is the equivalent of ignoring the play call and completely cowboying it. That’s not how it works in the NFL. You do what you are supposed to and make palys within the confines of what the coaches call. There are no corners in the NFL who can cover VJ on the under and recover well enough to play a well thrown deep ball. It just doesn’t exist. Its called basic defensive secondary realities.

by stufr on Aug 18, 2011 4:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I feel like a core point keeps getting ignored

Namely, that Kelly Jennings wouldn’t be on Vincent Jackson in a real game situation.

Formerly Known As Vasilii

by Thomas Beekers on Aug 18, 2011 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Know? No. And Jennings could still fight his way to a starting spot in camp

But there’s really no reason to believe he’s anything more than a nickel corner

Formerly Known As Vasilii

by Thomas Beekers on Aug 18, 2011 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

KJ makes me want to drink bleach.

Learn JiuJitsu.
Always looking for that new danger.

by RolloTomasi on Aug 18, 2011 2:31 PM PDT reply actions  

I think after this past pre-season game...

Jennings has problems, but ball skills is definitely one of them.

Anyone that thinks Yuniesky Betancourt outplayed anyone last year, you're a moron, and I hope your genes are stricken from the world to prevent further breeding.

by Gaude on Aug 21, 2011 9:53 AM PDT reply actions  

Doesn't anyone remember last year?

Jennings last year should’ve been executed. When I saw that the Seahawks picked him up for another year I was greatly disappointed. Although after watching Browner and Sherman these last 2 preseason games. I’d be extremely happy with either one of them taking the CB spot. Although what’s happened to Thurmond III? Once he is healthy enough to be on the field that should be the starting CB. Plus all of them are willing to tackle, unlike Jennings.

by Dickedoo on Aug 24, 2011 5:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies