Brian McIntyre on Seattle Seahawks contracts
The incomparable Brian McIntyre has done an extensive writeup over on TNT on the contracts of the Seahawks free agents and rookie additions. This includes a lot of contracts that were unknown until now, namely:
OG Robert Gallery: 3-year, $15 million with a $1 million signing bonus and $4 million guaranteed in the first year
DE Jimmy Wilkerson: 1-year, $1 million base with a $100,000 signing bonus.
LB Leroy Hill: 1-year, $685K in base salary, $100K guaranteed and $50K roster bonus per game.
CB Kelly Jennings: 1-year, $1.8 million in base salary, $200K signing bonus.
And by way of twitter, Brian McIntyre lets us know (here and here):
OL Tyler Polumbus: 1-year, $1.2 million (RFA tender)
FB Michael Robinson: 1-year, $1.35 million
S Atari Bigby: 1-year, $685K (vet minimum, like Hill)
LB David Vobora: 1-year, $600K
The highest UDFA signing bonuses went to Doug Baldwin ($17.5K), Jeron Johnson ($15K) and Pierre Allen ($10K). And Ricardo Lockette got $4.5K to sign. The new CBA stipulates all UDFAs get 3-year contracts with a per-team cap of $75K in signing bonuses (check the CBA for details like these), we spent $42.5K of that on the three top players.
A few observations after the break...
Of Sidney Rice's five-year, $41 million contract, $23.5 million is in the first three years, with a $6 million signing bonus, with his base salaries guaranteed in 2011 ($2M) and 2012 ($4M) and against injury in 2013 ($3.5M of $8.5M guaranteed). The total of $15 million guaranteed compares well to Santonio Holmes' $24 million guaranteed.
Zach Miller is fairly but not exorbitantly expensive. His contract compares to Vernon Davis' extension in total money ($6.8 to $7 million), but not in guaranteed money ($2.6 to $3.8 million). People get distracted by total money but guaranteed is more important. Neither Rice nor Miller makes top-end guaranteed dollar by these numbers (earlier reported numbers put Rice at $18.5 million guaranteed and Miller at $17 million guaranteed), which is good for us.
Gallery is cheap in both, which makes sense because he's not outstandingly good. I guessed him at about $4-5 million prior to the FA period, and that's where he landed.
The Kelly Jennings contract tells us they're serious about him, and people dreaming about him being cut should probably stop doing so. He fulfills a very specific role on our team, one we have no one else for. Doesn't seem to be too much guaranteed in case we do need to cut him.
Alan Branch's contract is low for a starter but with an enormous chunk guaranteed. I still think we overpaid here, but it's a short contract and we didn't overpay to a crippling extent.
The rest is a string of signings at or near veteran minimum, most of them likely to be gone next season if not before. As you can tell, Bigby was brought in one a try-out contract, and probably does not possess any guarantees on his roster spot. He hasn't stood out, and needs to prove he's flexible enough to play multiple spots and special teams well to make the roster.
The UDFA signing bonuses indicate who the FO is most serious about. It's not surprise Doug Baldwin leads the way.
65 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hill's contract is better than i imagined...
I wonder if he has one of those contracts full of incentives.
Either way though, if he plays really well he will make some good money!
by SGT Lenny on Aug 26, 2011 12:01 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
$165K in playing-time incentives
There probably wasn’t much of a market for him so we got him for vet min.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Aug 26, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Probably more valuable to us than anyone else, too.
I've got ridiculous upside.
-
Twitter: @JacsonBevens
by Jacson Bevens on Aug 26, 2011 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Remember the days when all our defensive salary was tied up in the LB corps?
by SmartAssCoug on Aug 26, 2011 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions
"If that's the strength of our team, that's the strength of our team."
Ruskell was such an idiot.
If you're not sure if there's a quarterback controversy, there is one.
Ya J Peterson was a terrible signing huh?
Ruskell was such an idiot he only helped bring us to the only Super Bowl we ever played in….
Respect goes a long way....
by Mangolover on Aug 27, 2011 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
just a fan who appreciates going to a Super Bowl
rather than a bandwagon fan with zero football knowledge who complains about things years after the fact….
Respect goes a long way....
the complaining is warranted...
i loved the Peterson signing….that’s a guy that earned his check…
going to a sb (and not winning ) at what cost though….rebuild vs refresh….do the steelers, patriots rebuild? they are" always" in the thick of it……bottom up not top down….
gb won the sb and on paper look better this year….vision
I did not
i was saying who i was. I am soo tired of threads always turning into anti Jennings and anti Ruskell. Its pretty ridiculous blaming them for everything including the rain here. Ya it is ruskells fault we were decimated by injuries his last 2 years, his fault r stars got old and retired, his fault we lost the super bowl and not jeremy stevens huh? It was so terrible he got us the ET pick at his expense, it was his fault the league allowed the stupidest contract ever to go thru… What else?
Respect goes a long way....
by Mangolover on Aug 27, 2011 3:07 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hawk 4ever
from day one til I pass away since Zorn, largent, raible, efrem, Niehaus,T Beeson, Butler, keith Simpson, John harris, Cornell webster, paul Johns, Doornick and all the old boys…
Respect goes a long way....
how so?
I am smart enough to actually appreciate his contributions in helping us make our only super bowl ever. I say the opposite blows my mind it is like people are unhappy we qwenrt to a super bowl. I understand also that injuries do happen in thre NFL and we were devastated by them. Riskelss 1st 3 years was our best very 3 year run we ever had without a doubt!
Respect goes a long way....
Time to sleep
sorry my typing is going to crap time to crash. So, i guess you are unhappy we ever went to a super bowl huh? Does not make any sense at all to me
Respect goes a long way....
happy we went to the superbowl
the bus was getting the key to the city!!!!!
-what i am hitting at is we are in better hands….sustainability…..that is what i want…..no one hit wonders but always in the converse…..ruskell is with the bears ? let us see….if they win the sb i will clay bar your car
Holmgren took us to the Superbowl
Ruskell wasn’t terrible, but he had no idea how to build a team. Just how to patch one together, and patching only works for so long. And then he hired Jim Mora Jr…
by B.B.Finnegan on Aug 27, 2011 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Eh, it's hard to differentiate between Holmgren and Ruskell those last few years.
Ruskell did have plenty of good moves to counter the bad ones while he was here. Seems to have been somewhere around average.
I know enough about football to know that you shouldn't put all your money into 4-3 linebackers.
And I’m not a bandwagon fan, mango. Been following this team loyally since 1983.
If you're not sure if there's a quarterback controversy, there is one.
Prediction:
Baldwin makes Tate expendable by the end of the season. Maybe Tate can play RB.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
Only if he can get over his fumblitus.
I would say hes too small but if Dexter Mccluster can do it, I guess GT could.
"It was my good fortune to watch Walter Jones ply his trade for over a decade -- and to understand, for a time, what Superman actually looked like." - Doug Farrar
Gallery
Really $5 mil per year avg is normal for a b- level starting interior lineman? How much did Davin Joseph get?
by dudeitscool on Aug 26, 2011 12:45 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
7.4M, with 2.7M a year guaranteed
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Aug 26, 2011 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
On a 7-year deal
for $19M guaranteed overall.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Aug 26, 2011 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I think your undervaluing what he brings to the team.
We have to spend some money. And it might as well be making a guy that is supposed to be an anchor of our line happy. If all goes as planned Gallery will help hold this line together, we are very young and Gallery will help these guys alot.
"It was my good fortune to watch Walter Jones ply his trade for over a decade -- and to understand, for a time, what Superman actually looked like." - Doug Farrar
Plus hes a company man with Tom Cable bringing him in.
"It was my good fortune to watch Walter Jones ply his trade for over a decade -- and to understand, for a time, what Superman actually looked like." - Doug Farrar
Who is showing up at D.T. out of the younger players?
I was reading on David Howard. 39 reps, over 400 max bench. And a very smart player. The cutting of Balmer makes me think somebody is stepping up
In other news
I got paid about 50 cents to read this…
Verry goo article Beekers!
I appreciate it with info I never head before. I thought Lockette got more that that, but good to know…
Respect goes a long way....
good I mean sorry
Need to proof I apologize but this helps put some things in perspective…
Respect goes a long way....
Hmmmm
He fulfills a very specific role on our team, one we have no one else for.
The problem is that Trufant has an injury history and Thurmond hasn’t been the picture of health either and Carroll and the coaches don’t appear afraid to use Jennings as a starter in that case. He’s fine covering the slot but he’s going to kill us if he ever fills in for Thurmond or Trufant.
Without double checking...
Other then the one and only serious injury to Trufant I don’t remember him being out because of injury. So I think you can pencil Tru in for the rest of the year.
You can never safely pencil anyone in
Injuries happen in football, no priors helps a players case but he can still very well get injured.
Curious
He fulfills a very specific role on our team, one we have no one else for.
What role is that again? Not trying to be a dick, I’m actually curious, because it’s presented as fact and I don’t think it’s particularly self-evident.
Experience and speed at the CB postion
And is the best we can get right now. My biggest concern is him in run support. Poor lil guy bounces off of RBs like he touched invincible Mario.
by Spin Forever on Aug 26, 2011 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's been theorized that Jennings
is being retained to cover slot receivers.
Jennings is like a durable, league average starting pitcher
it’s easy to dismiss what he brings to the table but it’s not without value.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on Aug 26, 2011 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I have a feeling that if Jennings gets signed
by a different team, he would play much better for them than he did for us. Just a feeling.
by B0w1-of-R1ce on Aug 26, 2011 7:09 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
More like a 4th starter-y, not average but not replacement level innings-eater type.
But yeah, he has value. Although I’m not convinced he isn’t replacement level. He’s more the replacement level we know.
by Johnny Slick on Aug 26, 2011 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Kelly Jennings is the baseball equivalent of Joe Saunders.
A first round pick that has massively underperformed expectations. Good enough to see regular playing time but shouldn’t be relied on to do the heavy lifting.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
And by regular playing time I mean a spot on an NFL roster.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
And by a spot on an NFL roster I mean a spot on someone else's NFL roster.
by Johnny Slick on Aug 26, 2011 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions
And by someone else you mean a divisional rival or Steelers, preferably.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
It's easy to dismiss?
You don’t think that every OC tells his QB that if he get in trouble and has to throw the ball target Jennings because he not going to pick it let alone pick it off?
opps.
I meant to say pick it off or even knock it down. Jennings is a leadoff hitter who doesn’t walk or have speed. A goal keep who is always in postion but doesn’t stop the ball. A catcher who can’t throw out a base runner. Jenning is an incomplete player he can do half the job but not all of it. When the ball is in the air headed for his wideout everything he did before the moment the QB threw the ball matters not.
Beekers do you get my point before?
This ignorant Jennings crap has been going on for a longgg time…
Respect goes a long way....
You need to give it a rest
Jenning does not have good hands, this has been established over and over and over.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Aug 27, 2011 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes
I’m just summing up all of it (lack of length, lack of ball awareness, stone hands) as “does not have good hands”, for the nonce.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Aug 27, 2011 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
People act like were cutting Jennings away from a 10 year dynasty.
And Ruskell was responsible for 1992.

by 
































