Seahawks Roster Musings: Looking Forward
I know the season is just starting, but I am pondering the decisions that need to be made once the season is over. Obviously, how players perform in terms of on the field production and health will factor into these decisions. Still, the contracts tell the story in a big way. Strong stable teams may only add one FA and their draft class (see PIT and GBP in 2011) while re-signing one or two of their own big free agents. We are moving toward that direction, but I still think we are going to be active in FA in 2012, at least in low to low-moderate levels.
2012 FA Decisions
Bigger Decisions:
RB
I think if Marshawn Lynch is average, they will re-sign him to a modest deal. If the Super Bowl window is 2014- by then Leon will be 32 and Justin Forsett and Lynch will be 28. Those are some old RBs and I doubt Leon will be playing by then, at least not on this current contract.
If you keep Marshawn then you probably want to swap out a soon to be 26 year old Forsett for a fresh 22 year old out of college. Again, look for the Seahawks to pursue a RB late in the 2012 draft.
DL
The biggest decision will be on whether to re-sign Red Bryant. The problem with Red is that he is only a 2-down player and he should not be paid the big money of a traditional pass rushing Defensive End. If we can keep him for $3-4M per year than I say do it. I can't see him commanding $5M type Brandon Mebane money on the open market.
The Seahawks want to stop the run and put the opponent into 3rd and obvious passing situations where they bring in 2 "Leos" and a nickel/bandit package. It allows players with "unique qualities" to function in their element of strength- but if you catch the Seahawks in the wrong personnel it's exploitable.
Other decisions will be Clinton McDonald and whichever interior pass rusher the Seahawks settle on (was Landon Cohen for a week or so). Perhaps one stays and one goes. They will likely both go! We will see if they flash in 2011. If not, expect them to go to someone else in FA and perhaps the draft for a backup NT and backup 3-tech/situational interior pass rush. Al Woods is locked up through 2013.
Raheem Brock is 33 yrs old. I think he can have a 8-9 sack year but won't be around by the time the Seahawks enter any possible Super Bowl Window. We need another young pass rusher in either Free Agency or Round 2 of the 2012 draft in my opinion. This is probably Brock's last year in Seattle. Could be a hell of a two year run though.
LB
I think a lot will depend on how Leroy Hill and David Hawthorne play. Pete has leverage with Malcolm Smith and KJ Wright. I can see one being back and one staying- but let's see how they play. Hill is on a $1m "prove it" one year deal and Heater is on a $1.7m one year deal.
Aaron Curry's cap number will drop in 2012 to around the $5-6M range. If he plays well in 2011 they may keep him- but I highly doubt it. His cap $ in 2011 is $10.8m. Yikes!
Most of that is because of a $5M bonus that was agreed upon his 2009 signing. You could cut him and sign another SAM for $2m per year and sign a Free Agent pass rusher for $8m per year in 2012 (That's what I would do if opportunity arises.)
Yes, I would draft a pass rusher, keep Clemons, and sign a big-time free-agent pass rusher if possible.
CB
Marcus Trufant will either be cut in 2012 or asked to restructure as he will make $7.2M and a cap $ north of $8M. That's not going to happen with this regime. Either Sherman or Thurmond end up taking over or they may go after a FA cornerback like a Terrell Thomas.
He just tore his ACL- but is 6 feet tall and has a history with Carroll at USC. He is a pretty good corner in my estimation. With needs at QB and pass rusher- I don't think a round 3 or round 4 cornerback is going to be better than Terrell Thomas unless his injury does not heal correctly. Then again, if Trufant restructured one time, he will restructure again- so if he has a good year they could keep him and perhaps pay him $3-4M per year.
Lesser Decisions:
OL
All the starters are pretty well locked up. Decisions will have to be made on the backups: Tyler Polumbus, Paul McQuistan and Breno Giacomini (who may not be a backup!). I don't think there will be a big market for any of these three players- so these really are not big decisions. If Breno flashes you could play Carpenter at LG, Gallery at RG and Moffitt ends up being an interior backup (which is fine).
WR/TE
No real decisions here unless you want to re-sign Dominique Byrd, which should be easy to do.
S
No real decisions here unless Kam is just horrible- which I doubt. Jeron Johnson is a backup and Atari Bigby could be re-signed on future 1-year rolling deals. He is on a 1 year deal, but at 30 years old this regime, (and I suspect the NFL) will never give him a long contract for the rest of his days.
QB
Probably Charlie Whitehurst's last year in Seattle. If he plays in 2011 and flashes- perhaps they re-sign him and cut Tarvaris Jackson. Either way- the regime better draft a QB in Rd1 to replace either Charlie or Tarvaris.
24 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is kind of ill-timed
Plenty of time for this after the season
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 13, 2011 11:33 AM PDT reply actions
if he does this after every week
then it’ll be interesting. Otherwise, if just once, then yes, ill timed.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Sep 13, 2011 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
After every week?
Roster decisions and the long-term roster outlook shouldn’t change on a week-to-week basis.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 13, 2011 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Why not?
e.g. charlie’s performance…seeing whether Carp grows or Giacomini steps up and pwns…things like that.
Heresy grows from idleness.
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Sep 13, 2011 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
The roster looked pretty different week one 2010 than it did, say, week 8, or week 12.
This is what we’re looking at from the beginning of the season. Might change mid-season and after this year.
"Scored a Deer Head" - Scruffy Lefty
Field Gulls
Follow me on the Twitters
by Danny Kelly on Sep 13, 2011 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I think it's something interesting to think about during the season.
It gives us an idea on who to keep an eye on and who might be playing for a roster spot next season.
It's a decent enough time.
Nothing says there can’t be an article like this written after the season, too.
"It's okay to have an open mind, just not so open that your brains fall out." - Carl Sagan (well, a lot of guys)
by Johnny Slick on Sep 13, 2011 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
I mostly agree with you
but it doesn’t hurt to have a long term plan.
As am I. And there I was thinking he was going to be a bigger part of the run game.
Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.
by Nick Andron on Sep 13, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Bryant was a flop at DT.
I’d think the competition for his services at DE would be minimal since he’s not exactly prototypical guy for that position. I’d hope this would allow the ’hawks to re-sign him for a reasonable contract if wanted.
I think he'll have a nice market with the 3-4 teams.
Still as a 2 down player though, so I think it will be an even playing (paying) field.
He also had season ending knee surgery last year.
He is much more valuable to us in our system than to anyone else not running our kind of system. Between those two issues, I don’t see Red being in high demand.
Eternally looking forward to someone making a Seahawks song based off of Lil' Jon's "Shots" song named "Hawks!"
"Either way- the regime better draft a QB in Rd1 to replace either Charlie or Tarvaris.
That is the bottom line… if they don’t , I believe Pete and Co. will be on the hot seat rather fast.
Great game Hawks... lets shock the world and beat the Steelers this weekend!!
Agree. Unless they have a really legit reason for not pulling the trigger.
That could mean they were unable to get in position (via trade) to get the guy they wanted, etc.
Or if we sign, or trade for, a legit QB in the off-season.
Always up for some Twitter action @nandron. I only talk NW sports, though.
Can't think of a legit reason for not getting a QB.
Even if it means pulling a Ditka and trading our entire draft. In which case, we’ll be a bit more active in FA than otherwise expected…
(Un)Fortunately, I don’t think getting a top pick in the 2011 draft will involve much trading of picks.
by Highwatermark on Sep 13, 2011 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm betting they're waiting for the right free agent...
not the big dollar guy but maybe the next Brees. Someone they look at and know he’ll fit, but some other team gave up on because of some measurement or stat.
Just a guess of course.
Everybody seems to think that the best case scenario for Charlie W is
he flashes enough at some point this year to be resigned as a backup, or a one year QB .bridge. But Matt H. was Charlie’s age when he got a second chance when the Raiders
put Dilfer on the injured list. And the rest is history. Point is if the Hawks win 5 games and can’t trade up for a stud QB next April, maybe, just maybe Charlie will be our point guard
QB for the next five years. And we win a SB with Charlie? Ok, never mind. Just typing out loud.
by broadbill birdwatcher on Sep 13, 2011 4:06 PM PDT reply actions
you never know
that would be ideal and we could go after a big time sack master fu or a nasty dt.
Super Bowl Window is 2011!!!
Or something like that
by clutterheart on Sep 13, 2011 6:04 PM PDT via mobile reply actions



































