Brandon Browner & Larry Fitzgerald... We're Still in LCB/RCB
After last week's game and Mike Wallace torching Brandon Browner, Pete Carroll made some remarks that were interpreted (by rotoworld, amongst others) to mean that Browner would be "matched up" - as in follow - Larry Fitzgerald. Immediate lightheadedness ensued. Oh my! You mean we'll actually have our corners match up to their ideal guys rather than just line up left and right each snap? A dream come true!
But nope, it was not to be. Don't get me wrong, Larry Fitzgerald was usually matched up with Brandon Browner, but it was not because Browner was tracking Fitzgerald, it was because because Fitzgerald usually lines up on the offensive left as the split end, and Browner is our defensive right cornerback.
Who cares, right? Well, I'm making note of this specifically because I've seen a lot of praise heaped on Browner for his performance against Fitzgerald, particularly shutting him down in the second half. I don't want to negate that praise, I agree with it mostly, he did look good matching up against a bigger guy, but it's missing two important facts:
1) Compared to the Steelers game (as noted here), the deep and double coverage schemes were much better. Pretty much any shot we got of Fitzgerald deep saw him in double coverage, which isn't surprising, but it's what you'd hope to see, and Browner not being hung out to dry on his own is a big factor in the improvement.
2) While Fitzgerald usually lines up at the split end left, during key drives where the Cardinals were pushing downfield and in hurry up mode, Fitzgerald would line up on the offensive right side of the field over half the time. There's four drives where this is the case: the third drive ending in the Fitzgerald TD, the final Cardinals drive of the 1st half ending in a Marcus Trufant interception, and the final two drives of the second half (for instance, Trufant was on Fitzgerald on the Chancellor interception).
I'm partially noting this just to get the facts straight, but mostly because it is worth noting that the improved play against Fitzgerald was due to improved play by numerous defensive players, not just Browner. Hell, a lot of our gameplan seemed to have changed: we were in nickel much more than against the Steelers, and Trufant used a cushion since he's good at that while Browner would press almost all the time. It was particularly great to see Browner and Fitzgerald go at it on running plays, with Fitzgerald aggressively blocking Browner. I know it's a sin to say since he's a Cardinal, but dammit Fitzgerald is awesome. Hell, that awesome was on display on the TD pass, which I considered one of the least interesting plays to analyze since it's just one of those "what do you do about it, it's Larry Fitzgerald" type plays.
I want to note a few other plays against Fitzgerald.
Here we have K.J. Wright and Brandon Browner both on the under on Larry Fitzgerald, with Earl Thomas over. Think you got enough guys on him? Kolb took the wide open Anthony Sherman (#35) for an easy pass on this play.
Here's one where it went wrong. Curry was in for one drive (and only for that drive, he did not play a snap otherwise), which would end up with a Fitzgerald touchdown. As mentioned, Fitzgerald would line up right more often than not on such drives. Trufant has a cushion here, and the over. Curry has the under, but loses track of the receiver and is easily beat for a first down.
Prior to the snap, Trufant is about four or five yards off the line. He reads screen, and is running up before Kolb even looks to make the pass, ankle-tackling Fitzgerald behind the line of scrimmage. This is veteran savvy.
Speaking of veteran savvy, here the Seahawks are in nickel (as we usually were doing to hurry-up drives), Cardinals in four wide, defense in zone...
... Fitzgerald is running a deep out. Earl Thomas is over him, but notice Trufant's positioning. This is kind of a poor throw by Kolb, but Trufant is positioning himself really well to cut into the route, which he does. Intercepted.
This is the most basic look that I can only assume we being utilized most of the time with Browner on Fitzgerald: him in the under, Earl Thomas (or Kam Chancellor) over. It works perfectly. Kolb stared at the matchup for a while, then ran it for six (short of the first).
So. In a nutshell. While I was happy to see Browner perform better, this one was at least as much about other players, particularly improved play by our two young safeties and the outstanding game Chris Clemons had.
To look forward a bit... If we're still going LCB/RCB with constant safety help for Roddy White this week, the Falcons have more options to shred us, unlike the Cardinals. But the Falcons are a team that needs to establish the run as Matt Ryan does not do well as a high-volume passer, and they have been struggling with protection. The former plays well to our strength, the latter well might if Chris Clemons keeps up his high level of performance.
20 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I expect us
to really give the Falcons offense a run for its money. Last year could’ve been a win minus the turnover meltdowns.
The offense, now that’s a different question…Here’s to Carpenter improving in an exponential pattern.
As for the Seahawks, they shall have stars at elbow and foot...Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again...Death shall have no dominion.
I expect us to win, have for a while.
Still think they’re a much better team and that we may be half-way to our season win count after the game, but I expect a second win and unrealistic, conflicting optimism. Not that I’ll be surprised to lose.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Sep 29, 2011 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I felt like we should have beat Atlanta last season honestly, I had a sort of mini-"we let em off the hook" meltdown after that game
I also think if you swapped NO for ATL in our home playoff game we still would have won. I don’t think I feel that way about any of the other NFC teams.
Da Bears at home last year gave me the same feeling.
Was that 2 years ago?
by Stay Off the Flowers on Sep 29, 2011 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions
This is still a very young team
On both sides of the ball. So it’s really good to see both player and scheme development as the year goes on. I’m not expecting the Seahawks to win many games. I just wan them to be a better team in December than they are now.
You note that Browner is in press while Trufant is giving a cushion.
I didn’t see the game, but that info leads me to think they’re rolling the safety coverage to Browner’s side, and the LB coverage to Trufant’s. Is this the case? It seems to me that I see Thomas playing deep on the, uh, “left” side (Browner’s) quite frequently, also, which seems a little weird, since if the above is true that means that Kam has deep-center responsibility.
Boy, what I wouldn’t give for that full-field perspective on the game all of the time.
Good writeup, by the way.
Yes
I didn’t see the game, but that info leads me to think they’re rolling the safety coverage to Browner’s side, and the LB coverage to Trufant’s. Is this the case?
Safety in over supporting Browner, LB in under supporting Trufant. With some variation, of course.
With All-22 (I have some but not a lot) there’s no telling how exactly the safeties are set up, but Earl did generally seem to be in on Browner’s coverage. They seem to trust Chancellor a lot as single high though I personally think he’s too stiff to make any different if his spot is challenged (which it wasn’t much).
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 29, 2011 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd expect that he wouldn't get challenged very much.
If you’re playing against a lot of three-deep coverage, it’s pretty tough to throw long and you end up picking through holes underneath. That, plus I’m pretty sure all the wide receivers out there aren’t particularly excited by the prospect of running shoddily-thrown seam routes into a 6’3" 200lb+ safety’s zone.
This seems to fit into Pete’s turnover-producing philosophy. Cover the shit out of the field with continually changing zones and hope you get a lot of coverage sacks from Clemons or interceptions off balls tipped by rangy linebackers in short zones. It’s a risky way to go, in my opinion, as any decent quarterback is going to be able to read those zones and just shred your coverage. Especially if they nullify Clemons… who else is going to get a rush?
by djafrot on Sep 29, 2011 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I still expect it to get challenged.
Lure him in, get someone to burn past him for a big one, whither the confidence, it could turn out pretty bad. I have a lot of hope that he & the team would be able to respond to that well enough, but I expect it challenged.
Head of catering.
by jacobstevens on Sep 29, 2011 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions
The deep middle is often threatened by tight ends running seam routes. Who better than Kam to light them up in deep middle coverage?
by nickfru1 on Sep 29, 2011 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I like how he double-earholes himself with his own feet
After landing flat on his back. Fucking o-u-c-h
Great stuff
As much as Browner seemed to improve, you’re right, improved play around him also is to be noted.
So what's the rational for sticking with LCB/RCB?
Do we know? Is it somewhat like LT and RT where Truf is better turning one way than the other?
I can’t imagine a non-established player like Browner laying claim to one side or the other.
Trufant has stuck to one side before with shoulder issues dictating where he plays..
But I think it’s just been something he’s used to for most of his career.
It's been this way for quite a while now, yeah
Nothing to do with Browner.
Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 30, 2011 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions
great article
when the camera’s panned out you could see some of the cushion we were giving the recievers and because of the constant stream of pressure arizone might have missed alot of the immediate routes they should have taken advantage of like the way pittsburg did. kolb doesn’t seem to see the field as clearly as ben. he holds on to that ball longer than tavaris at times.
if i remember correctly our secondary plays off and almost depends on the pass rush. we got that this week and they played much better. last week there was absolutely no rush by our defense

by 







































