Your Questions Answered: The Field Gulls Mailbag - Vol. 2
The Field Gulls Mailbag is a bi-weekly feature where you, the reader, can submit your questions about anything and everything Seahawks. To submit a question for the next edition of the "Mailbag" send it to fieldgullsmailbag@gmail.com
It's "Kickoff Weekend", it's Blue Friday and it's the return of the FG Mailbag! Once again you guys submitted some great questions, so without further ado:
Chase from Parts unknown writes: What are the 3 biggest keys to getting a W week one in San Francisco?
Right out of the gate, lets address what's on everyone's mind: the offensive line. 49ers coordinator Vic Fangio will test the Seahawks young line ALL DAY LONG. There is no question that how the o-line goes, the game will go. They need to show an improved ability to pass block effectively.
Key number 2 will be the running game. From the minute the offseason began, Pete Carroll was focused on improving Seattle's rushing attack. He hired Tom Cable, upgraded the OL via free agency and the draft and now it's time to see if that bears any fruit. Because pass protection is questionable, the run game is even more important. Seattle wants to show their toughness and they're going to need to do so to get the win in San Francisco.
The final key to the game is on the defensive side of the football, and it will be the play of the linebacking corps. Lofa Tatupu is gone, Leroy Hill is back, David Hawthorne is starting and Aaron Curry continues to be a work in progress. On top of that, Hawthorne and Hill have nagging knee injuries that could affect their availability for Sunday. No matter who ends up taking the field, the questions surrounding the position remain the same: are they a better unit this year? In 2010 that group didn't make many big plays, force many turnovers or do anything "spectacular". Jim Harbaugh will be aggressive on offense, and the young LB's will be tested, if they rise to the occasion, Seattle should come away victorious.
Mark from Vancouver, Wash. writes: Do you see our young bigs like James Carpenter, John Moffitt and Max Unger being able to jell and be capable pass protectors so [Tarvaris Jackson] can have time to pick a D apart? And do you see Russell Okung staying healthy? 'Hawks desperately need him anchoring that left side. I will trade ankles with him if I must. Thanks.
Much was made of the struggles of the offensive line during the preseason, and justifiably so. The lack of OTA's didn't help the situation, but it isn't the only reason for the group's insufficiencies. It is will documented that Carpenter came into camp out of shape, and there is little debate that his performance in the preseason was poorest of all the offensive linemen.
That being said, the Seahawks are trying to develop him, experimenting with him at LG and committed to their investment in him. It's far too early to call him a bust, but time will tell. I feel that the rest of the line will be ok, I liked Moffit and Unger, they got better each week, and I think as they continue to jell with Gallery and Okung the line will improve. I DO think Okung stays healthy, he proved during his college career his is durable, and I think these ankle injuries have been a combination of bad luck (last year) and an inability to rehab with team doctors this offseason due to the lockout.
They've been cautious with him, and I think he plays 14-16 games this year. All that being said, this offensive line will experience growing pains. They're being built for the long run, and in spite of what this year may look like, I think they'll ultimately be ok.
Bruce from Parts Unknown writes: In order to be prepared for an opposing team each week, practices must include knowing how an opponent is likely to line up and act. Do the Seahawks employ a "prep team" or do they use specific players from their 53 person regular squad?
Bruce, in the NFL they use an eight member "practice squad". The practice squad members, generally speaking, are players who were cut by the team during training camp and that the team still think might develop. For further reading on how the practice squad works, check out this article from the National Football Post.
Roger from SD (San Diego or South Dakota, it's is up to you to claim him) writes: OK, over or under, 4 starts for T-Jax before getting benched of injured and Whitehurst takes over at QB?
I don't think Tarvaris Jackson gets benched before the bye, if at all. Injury, however, is a different story. For now, Carroll has preached that Jackson''s familiarity with the playbook set him apart, so he is committed to Tarvaris. Beyond that, offenses need to develop chemistry, and so splitting reps throughout training camp and the preseason made little sense to the staff.
The reason I don't think he gets benched before the bye is because Carroll would use the bye week to prepare Whitehurst in the same fashion training camp prepared Jackson. It would allow him to get more reps with the first team and develop chemistry of his own before stepping under center as the starter. Certainly injuries could change that, and given the poor pass protection in the preseason, that it a legitimate concern.
Wes from Parts Unknown writes: With all the roster moves lately, it would be great to have some insight as to what players earned a roster spot for their special teams play. Also, I'd like to know who has/who will be playing the all-important, yet under-appreciated, special teams for the Hawks. How many different players usually contribute, i.e. is there a different group for both sides of the ball on kickoffs and punts, which would make a total of four different groups?
61 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Too early to call him a bust"
Is anyone REALLY considering Carpenter a bust before he’s played a meaningful snap IN HIS CAREER? SERIOUSLY!?
by Trepidation on Sep 9, 2011 3:56 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I'm not, but the other worrying aspect besides his preseason play
is his attitude. Unless he was injured, why on earth would any 1st round draftee turn up to training camp completely out of shape? That’s pretty appalling even in amateur sport. Perhaps this is a question for next week’s mailbag….
There have been a ton of players who have shown up out of shape.
The question is whether how many teams were routinely able to be allowed to work out in their college’s facilities, see the college team’s doctors, trainers and dietitians, etc. Because they certainly weren’t allowed to work out at the facilities of the NFL team that drafted them.
He's a lineman in his first year, it happens.
The team wouldn’t draft a laggard. Easy.
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
Why not?
Because the Seahawks are magically better than another NFL team?
Carroll wouldn't, no.
Always compete and all that. He wouldn’t want a guy who doesn’t constantly work his tail off.
I've a lot to learn, just a green student of the game...
…but come on, the man is a professional athlete. I can understand how he might not be in shape and hardened to play an actual NFL season game, but he looked absolutely dire in those first weeks. If that was down to fitness, then sorry, what the hell has he spent the off-season doing – couldn’t get his arse to a regular gym? Christ, I’d be in there from the day I heard my name called.
And you still would be out of shape without pro trainers helping you
Its another level of training. Plus the fact that he probably never trained on his own and after you leave college, with no pro help, you might be a little lost. Its not that surprising for this offseason and somewhat forgivable. Next season will be a different story.
they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!
Some guys have to work because their income isn't guaranteed, some guys want to spend more time with their family, finishing up school, etc.
"It was a dream come true to be the quarterback in Seattle; Bigger and better than anything I could have dreamed of." -Matthew Hasselbeck
none of those reasons
Should stop the man from working out.
Who said he didn't work out?
Just “working out” isn’t going to get you in shape for the NFL.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Sep 9, 2011 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions
yes
“bust” has been tossed around on Bob and Groz this week.
by Scott Enyeart on Sep 9, 2011 4:04 PM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
I don't think we should dignify talk radio by citing it here.
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
by shams on Sep 9, 2011 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
Maybe not a bust yet but....
He was a huge reach and showing it so far.
When they announced that pick I went, “tha hell?!” I think every Seahawk fan did.
by The Great Googly on Sep 9, 2011 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions
He was not a huge reach if he pans out
If he truly is a top line/all pro RT or LG then his draft position was completely worth it. They scouted him as such, therefore he wasn’t a reach at the time.
they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!
Maybe he should have gone #1 than
Since he is a sure bet.
by The Great Googly on Sep 9, 2011 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn't say that
And we didn’t pick number one. we were in the twenty’s where RT and LG who are worth it go.
they took turns pissing into the bitch's ocular cavities.
This way to the cafeteria!
Whether he was a reach or whether he was worth it are two different things.
If he was expected to go in the third and we grabbed him in the 1st, it’s still a reach regardless of whether he’s destined for the HoF. I don’t know if Carpenter was that big of a reach, and a small reach is fine if the coaches believe he’ll be worth it. Time will tell.
Now with more pessimism!
It was not a big reach.
We didn’t have a pick before he would have gone. We didn’t want Carimi. I personally don’t see why we didn’t want Carimi since we later took Moffitt. Even if Moffit carried Carimi at Wisconsin, it’s probably easier to carry a guy you know. There were good reports this week about Carpenter at left guard. If he’s just not quick enough to be precise with his step, punch and set while tracking a defensive end around the outside, guard is better for him. He also says he likes the left side. I’ll give him another couple of shots before I fire his ass.
by EthelGemerman on Sep 9, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions
With a Dline that can't get any pass rush and a young secondary, our LB group is the least of our problems
Also
Bruce from Parts Unknown writes: In order to be prepared for an opposing team each week, practices must include knowing how an opponent is likely to line up and act. Do the Seahawks employ a “prep team” or do they use specific players from their 53 person regular squad?
Bruce, in the NFL they use an eight member “practice squad”. The practice squad members, generally speaking, are players who were cut by the team during training camp and that the team still think might develop. For further reading on how the practice squad works, check out this article from the National Football Post.
That was a good question and one of the few that couldn’t be answered by any of our writers here, but you don’t really answer it. I assume he knows about the practice squad, he’s asking how they actually practice. It’s fairly normal in the NFL to have your 3rd QB “pretend to be” the opponent’s QB, and similarly try to have your first teams practice against lineups they are likely to face this upcoming weekend. He’s asking if that’s true for the Seahawks, what our method is, who we use to replicate something like the 49ers 3-4.
The bye week being the time when Tarvaris rotates out makes sense. PC’s hand might be forced earlier though, either due to injury or due to Tarvaris Jackson playing at the level of Tarvaris Jackson.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
Thomas
I don’t think the 49ers have an OL that will challenge the Seahawk’s DL or a passing attack that will challenge the young secondary. So, for THIS game, given the circumstances surrounding LB health, I think they are a more pressing issue
Re: the practice squad question, if he wanted something more Seahawks specific, that’s my bad for not reading the question that way, I’ll try and make time to revise the post.
by Scott Enyeart on Sep 9, 2011 4:07 PM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
The 49ers Oline is a joke
But so is the Vikings Oline, and we weren’t exactly getting a lot of push there.
This is the same team that hung 40 points on us last year and our defense hasn’t gotten any better on the short term, plus they didn’t have Gore then. Any competent passing attack should be able to shred us, and combining Smith’s bare competent with their receiving weapons should be enough. Gore and Davis in particular will have a field day, I admit you can put a lot of that on our faulty coverage on the flats.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions
That 40-21 scoreline was made ghastly
by the stream of turnovers, including 4 interceptions – not one of Hassleback’s better days, and there were a few of those last year. So if we look after the ball ( TJack must be sick of hearing that, and our run defence is better than last year (Red wasn’t playing for a start) then I think we compete, and they look beatable. From one day away. With my head in the clouds.
I texted,
‘I feel like I’m in crazy town! to a friend after the fourth or fifth interception because I felt like I was in Crazy Town.
by EthelGemerman on Sep 9, 2011 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions
based on that
Welp, a preseason game means a lot these days. Forget the wins over San Diego and Oakland, it’s all about that Minnesota loss.
We are going 0-16 then. I am getting Sunday Ticket refunded and not watching a game. If the worst team on the schedule, and their egomaniac head coach, are “competent” enough to dominate Seattle, there is no need to play a game this season. Play backups and draft Luck. Doesn’t sound like the Seahawks have a chance at anything else.
This will save me a ton of time, won’t need to write or watch a thing!
by Scott Enyeart on Sep 9, 2011 5:49 PM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
I'm not sure what you're getting at here, I'm being critical because this Seahawks team doesn't look like a very good Seahawks team
This isn’t Seahawks.com. This is a blog of independent thinkers who have their own football competence. Blanket dismissals like your post do not add to the discussion.
I don’t judge preseason games by wins or losses. I don’t care about the final scoreline. I care about our 1st team getting trounced by every team we faced, including San Diego. Oakland was the only team we could match up against because our strengths and weaknesses matched up well with theirs, their poor pass defense and strong run defense. That’s not the case against the 49ers, and I’m arguing why it is. You’re not providing counter-arguments.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions
not really sure where the confusion is
You brought up valid points about how awful this young team is. I didn’t disagree with them, just stated that based on them, the Seahawks don’t stand to win a game. Don’t really think that has anything to do with Seahawks.com, independent thinking, or validity of a post. If anything, I agreed with you.
by Scott Enyeart on Sep 9, 2011 6:20 PM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Except I never said we wouldn't win a game
You were making a mockery of my opinion with no clear cause for doing so. You’re going to see a lot of people rag on Seahawks players and their FO here. That’s how this blog operates. That’s how this blog should operate. As long as the criticism is founded and well-reasoned, it’s not a problem.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Why would Gore and Davis have a field day?
Our defense seems to be strongest up front, weaker on short passes where defensive ends or linebackers are covering running backs over the middle and in the flat and weakest 1 on 1 on longer passes both because of our backfield and the lack of pressure our line generates. I would be more worried about Vernon Davis and Crabtree than either Gore or Davis, though, I guess it’s possible that everybody has a field day for the 49ers on Sunday. It’s a good feeling when everybody wins.
by EthelGemerman on Sep 9, 2011 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions
You'd be more worried about Davis than Davis?
I was, in fact, referring to the short passing game, as evinced by my referring to passing in the flat.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not convinced we won't get any pass rush.
We did rush pretty well last year and I don’t think Carroll wants to showcase how we’re going to get that done this year. Clem and Brock are still there. I’m honestly looking forward to seeing how the real, schemed defense performs against their best unit. Logic would tell me that the 49ers’ offense is their best unit going against our best and vice versa. Maybe we’ll get one of those low-scoring, fourth-and-goal at the end, Rams kind of games.
by EthelGemerman on Sep 9, 2011 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions
At this point, I think most teams have a "Scout Team" that (trys to) imitate next week's opposition during practice.
If your team was going to play the Eagles next week, and you had a backup QB that is fast and has a strong arm, as well as two speedy backup receivers, they may be valuable contributors on such a Scout Team, as your trying to prepare for their particular style of play. I’m not really sure, though, how valuable practicing against a Scout Team is in preparing to play a game really is (probably better than not doing so at all).
Aye, that's what I think too
But I haven’t seen insiders really talk about it, ever, I’d be interested in hearing more of the process. That seems the most sensible stuff to ask Scott about, you can ask analytic questions like “what are the three keys” can be answered by any FG writer and most commentators.
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Scout Team
The real answer here is that the “scout team” is made up of backups and PS players and every NFL team uses them in practice during the season. Teams do try and have players imitate specific opponents and match up similar skillsets but not everything/everyone can be well imitated with our personnel. Specifics on how much they try and imitate and who does what likely changes from week to week.
by CMoney87 on Sep 9, 2011 11:03 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I don't think the OP quite understood the prep squad question.
He wasn’t asking about the practice squad, he was asking how the Seahawks practice. Do they have the second stringers learn a quick and dirty version of the opposition offense and defense in order to get reps against it, or do they just practice against each other and hope that the strength of their own core will prove out in the end? I actually never really thought much about the question before, myself, and would be interested in an answer. My guess is that most teams don’t really run out prep squads because of a. roster issues compared to college (53 guys vs 80) and b. the fact that most pro teams run some wrinkle of the same thing, whereas in college you’re much more likely to have like 1 team in your division run the wishbone, 1 run the run and gun, etc.
"It's okay to have an open mind, just not so open that your brains fall out." - Carl Sagan (well, a lot of guys)
DAMN YOU, BEEKERS!!!!
YOU WILL RUE THE DAY YOU CROSS ME
"It's okay to have an open mind, just not so open that your brains fall out." - Carl Sagan (well, a lot of guys)
I already do
Rue it mightily
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hey as Long as you don't
Cross streams, the universe should hold up.
Why? Because PC and JS said so!
In feudal Japan they would seal business deals that way.
"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."
I went ahead and rec'd this because you are a good sport.
"It's okay to have an open mind, just not so open that your brains fall out." - Carl Sagan (well, a lot of guys)
Thank you Scott
I’m Chase. Representing SW Washington. I appreciate your answers and love the thread
by Reebeck12 on Sep 9, 2011 4:32 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I'm still not sure what this mailbag is bringing to the table
Don’t mean to be negative, I just don’t think the format makes sense for FG given how fast this community digests news, answers our own questions, and moves on.
by jhmg16 on Sep 9, 2011 6:11 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 4 recs
Maybe we need to start asking better questions.
Great football doesn't happen overnight. No, usually it happens in the morning or around midday. Sometimes in the evenings.
by scorpiknox on Sep 9, 2011 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
A lot of sites run mailbags
But you’re right, those are sites with a divide between writer and audience, generally, where that is just a good means to get some pressing issues out there (I enjoy Sando’s mailbag, for instance). If someone wants to ask Danny or any other writer here a question, they can…just do so.
That said, Scott is in a unique position to answer insider questions, and this is a great means of doing so. On the other hand, a lot of these questions are analytic in nature, to which he isn’t uniquely positions, since any of us can watch footage and give our thoughts on players, given the time.
So I dunno, you may have a point, but instead of just going “well this doesn’t work”, help us think of ways to make it better, including, as scorpiknox says, asking better questions. I suggested to Danny that we may want to have the question asker themselves indicate what staff member they want answering their question, so you can ask Danny about his feelings on Ryan getting his hair cut, or me if I really am gay for Golden Tate. Thoughts?
Formerly Known As Vasilii
by Thomas Beekers on Sep 9, 2011 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I think what might work best is a weekly Q and A
Where throughout the week, or maybe begin it midweek, people here ask questions and Scott can answer them (or whomever feels qualified).
But at the same time, that does have it’s drawbacks. Would this have to be bumped every day? (perhaps just in the morning?). And there’d be a lot more questions for Scott to answer (more then the five here, where you can select the best and concentrate your efforts on those and provide a more thorough analysis). Although he could just answer the ones he chooses rather then try to get to everybody. But there would also be a lot more people answering questions and getting into arguments and chaos and anarchy.
So I guess I don’t know, just my thoughts.
Agreed
And it’s not like O’Neil or Williams or Sando have much more analytical insight than Enyeart.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Sep 10, 2011 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Jhmg16-
deleted the below commentary on accident, wasn’t trying to censure anybody. Thanks for the feedback for sure. We’ll chat about it and work to improve the process.
"Scored a Deer Head" - Scruffy Lefty
FIELDGULLS
Haha -- honestly i was censuring myself but it deleted the entire thread. I do appreciate the comments.
"Scored a Deer Head" - Scruffy Lefty
FIELDGULLS
No I 100% believe you my friend
I just hate this interface, I can only imagine what the back end is like to deal with, and I’m not surprised it happened
I just wish I hadn’t spent 30 minutes writing, proofreading and nitpicking those two stupid paragraphs
Go Seahawks?
I know -- dont worry your comments were duly noted.
Scott, Thomas and I all read them so it wasn’t a total waste (I’ve been chatting with Scott already about how to improve the feature). Again, sorry. We’ll try and get this ironed out so it works a little better down the line. We really do take the feedback to heart.
"Scored a Deer Head" - Scruffy Lefty
FIELDGULLS
You guys are great.
I’m loyal to FG to death and have put at least 15-20 people on to the site. And to Scott- thanks for contributing to my favorite website and I look forward to reading more of your work in the coming days and weeks.
Loving the feedback
I love all the ideas you guys are coming up with! Our goal is to make the mailbag a helpful, useful feature. We are still tweaking it, and the feedback is great.
by Scott Enyeart on Sep 10, 2011 7:48 AM PDT via iPhone app reply actions

by 
































