Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Quarterback Market: Joe Webb

Before you say it, let me say it: Joe Webb isn't on the market.

As the backup QB in Minnesota, Webb has become a favorite of fans, teammates, and coaches with his positive attitude off of the field and his crazy athleticism on it. Webb has already led the Vikings to multiple come-from-behind victories in his two-year career and I doubt that anyone would want to see him go.

Unfortunately for the Vikings, they aren't a team that can afford to miss an opportunity to get better now. Christian Ponder was selected as the 12th overall pick in the 2011 draft and the quarterback of the future. While coach Leslie Frazier has hinted at the possibility of a competition in the off-season, I would be shocked if Ponder was given up on so soon. While I was personally shocked that he went in the first round, Ponder has actually played very well at times this year and is a good prospect in the NFL.

Minnesota has no reason to believe they should part with Webb, who would be amongst the best backups in the NFL, but if they can pick up a draft pick or two (or player) in return for a guy that they only used a 6th round pick on in 2010, should they not take it?

After finishing at 3-13, the Vikings two best players are in their prime (Adrian Peterson and Jared Allen) and Minnesota has got to try and take advantage of the now. In my opinion, they're sitting on a potential gold mine with Webb. Should Seattle be considering going back to the well (lake?) in Minnesota to find a quarterback?

Here's a quick profile I've done on Minnesota backup QB Joe Webb.

Star-divide

UAB

Webb attended the University of Alabama-Birmingham and redshirted during his freshman season. The next year, he still sat on the bench for most of the year but finally started the last two games of the year. Webb threw for 426 yards against Central Florida in the final game.

Still, this did not win him the job for the next season. At least not at quarterback.

Large_webb_medium

Webb started seven games at wide receiver and caught 30 passes for 459 yards. He has lined up a tiny bit at wide receiver in the NFL, and was drafted at the position, but former coach Brad Childress announced early in his career that they were going to try him out at QB first.

During his junior season at UAB, he started all 12 games at QB and ran for a Conference-USA record 1,021 yards (record for a QB, obviously.) The next season he ran for 1,427 yards (3rd highest in NCAA history for a QB) and passed for 2,299 yards. He is the only QB in NCAA history to throw for over 2,000 yards and run for over 1,000 yards in consecutive seasons.

Despite being in the NCAA record books, UAB is not considered to be a big enough college power to automatically get a QB like Webb an invite to the combine. Personally, I don't exactly understand why, because he's clearly one of the best athletes that college football had ever seen at the QB position. There should have at least been enough interest to see how "freakish" this kid really was.

Turns out, pretty freakish.

UAB Pro Day

Webb had to put in his numbers at the UAB Pro Day rather than the combine. His 4.43 40-yard dash would have been one of the best ever put up by a QB and would keep him in the middle-of-the-pack for wide receivers. His vertical jump and standing long jump would have led all wide receivers.

If this site is telling the truth about the best standing long jump in combine history, than Joe Webb would hold the record at 11 feet, 5.5 inches.

Webb even went viral with this video of him jumping over "7 bags" with the Vikings.

The most incredible part (to me) is that all of this information about him being fast, about him being tried out at wide receiver, about his athletic ability, would lead a person to believe that maybe he's not been seen as a top-end QB prospect because of his size. But Webb is listed at 6'4, 220 lbs, and he looks like a big enough guy on the field.

He doesn't look like Daunte Culpepper out there, but he's not Charlie Ward either. He's a big guy but so elusive and quick that it's hard to believe that a big guy can run like that.

Vikings

Webb was drafted with the 199th pick, just like Tom Brady.

Nfl_i_jwebb1_576_medium

It was a fair place for Webb to be drafted because whether you were drafting him as a quarterback or a wide receiver, you were drafting a very raw prospect. He would need time to develop at either position. Unlike Seneca Wallace, he seems willing to do whatever the team asks him to do and is just happy whenever he gets the opportunity to contribute.

Before the season finale yesterday, Webb was very vocal about hoping for Christian Ponder to be healthy because Ponder is the leader of the team and a big part of the Vikings future. This isn't like Mark Brunell backing up Mark Sanchez, this is a case of a second-year player who has had a few opportunities to play and has become a local legend in Minnesota supporting the only guy standing in his way of starting.

Webb should be thinking about whether or not teams are going to blow-up the Vikings phone asking about his availability. From what I saw, Webb is a viable candidate to start in the NFL next season and potentially lead a team to the playoffs.

What I Saw

I watched the Vikings-Bears game from yesterday. Ponder started but left the game on a brutal hit early in the game and Webb came in for the rest of it.

Let's get the numbers out of the way early: 17 of 32 for 200 yards, 0 TD/2 INT, 6.3 Y/A. One of the interceptions came on a pass to Percy Harvin that just flipped up and landed in the hands in the defender. It was not Webb's fault in that it was not an inaccurate pass that went right to a defender, but it was Webb's fault in that the pass was so low that the receiver had to dive for it and it popped up and took an unlucky path into the defenders hands.

The other interception came on the last offensive play of the game, with the Vikings down four points and needing to drive 93 yards for a game-winning score. There was about 30 seconds left, no timeouts for the Vikings, right around mid-field and Webb went for it and the ball was under-thrown and intercepted. If the Vikings hadn't botched a field goal attempt minutes earlier, maybe Webb doesn't attempt that pass.

He was actually pretty impressive during the two-minute drill, only missing on that throw really.

Joe-webb-_33_medium

More important than the numbers though is what I saw from him as a QB. He possesses at least one quality that we all wish Tarvaris Jackson had, which is the ability to avoid sacks. He was sacked one time during the game, and I would honestly guess that if Jackson was in the same situations, he would have been sacked at least six times.

At one point it became ridiculous how hard it was to get a sack on Webb. It doesn't mean that every possession was a great one, he didn't avoid every sack for gain, but he got rid of the ball a lot. Webb seems to focus a lot on the fact that he doesn't want to be sacked. Not that it's a bad thing, but he could stand to have more of a pocket presence.

Part of the problem is that the Vikings desperately need help on the offensive line (something they might get with USC OT Matt Kalil, one of the best LT prospects to come around in a long time) but it also seems that Webb, like many other athletic QB's, is too quick to start running and at times got himself into trouble by going back 10-20 yards.

The good news is that he is amazing at making sure he's out of the pocket when he throws it away, or that he gets it to a receiver in the area. At one point, he was being sacked by two Bears and somehow what had already looked like a loss of eight, he had flipped the ball to Lorenzo Booker. The pass was incomplete, but he somehow managed to save the yardage.

I also saw him get wrapped up by Julius Peppers and escape it.

Sometimes he just throws it away. Sometimes he'll run for a first down. Sometimes he'll find a receiver for positive gain. But you'll never be frustrated by him getting sacked for holding the ball too long, unlike Tarvaris.

His accuracy is questionable at best. At times, he will still impress you by making a beautiful pass, but he also misses guys too often. His arm strength is fine and he's got some nice zip on his passes.

Conclusion

I don't know that Webb will develop into a great quarterback, but I'm pretty damn certain that he's one of the most interesting. He's probably the most athletic QB in the league right now, and that includes Cam Newton, Michael Vick, and Tim Tebow.

I've been wondering lately what the success of Tebow would do to the career of a guy like Webb and whether or not a team would be willing to trade a high draft pick for him and build their offense around him as well. This was obviously before Tebow-mania went defunct and fell ass-backwards into a home playoff game.

Still, Webb is not Tebow.

He is not a run-first QB that can kind of pass it. He's a QB that can kind of pass it but has the ability to run it and has similar athleticism in the open-field to teammate Harvin. He tries to make things happen with his feet too early sometimes and gets himself into trouble, but rarely seems to pay for it.

Tarvaris Jackson was sacked once every 10.7 pass attempts in 2011. Webb, in a much smaller sample size, was sacked once every 21 pass attempts. I admit the sample size is small, but just watch the two QBs play and tell me that it's not indicative of how they play.

It's a pretty accurate representation of both QBs.

Joe Webb's final numbers this season were not great. He completed 54% of his passes and only 6.0 yards per attempt. He did however run for 154 yards and 2 TDs, one of those on a 65-yard dash against the Lions in a near comeback victory.

I don't think that Tarvaris Jackson had a terrible season, he was actually a little bit better than I thought or expected. Seattle was able to win some games with him and at times he actually helped. At other times, it seemed clear how much better the Hawks would be if they improved at the position.

Is Webb an improvement?

I think so. Though it's possible that Webb never gets any more accurate or never finds a better feel for staying in the pocket, it's also still possible that he becomes similar to the QB he backed up for a time this season; Donovan McNabb.

It was almost as if the Vikings felt it was safe to cut McNabb because they had a younger version of him already on the team. (Or they cut him because he looked like the worst quarterback in the NFL.)

I don't think that the Vikings will trade Webb, but I think they'll hear some offers and I think they have to consider them. They can't waste their window of opportunity with Allen and Peterson and they have got to get Christian Ponder more help. Minnesota should draft Kalil if they can and add another pick or player in a deal for Webb, and the potential for a bounce-back is possible next season if they can stay healthy.

If the Seahawks managed to get Webb, it would actually make me even more excited for next season. Moreso than Matt Flynn, but I guess that conversation will have to be saved for next time.

My Twitter

My Website

Comment 59 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice, thanks Kenny

I got the "proactive like nonstop’ label last offseason, but I have the feeling you’re going to be challenging me for that this year. Either way, it was a good look at Webb, someone that I’ve been hearing more and more about this year. Makes me want to go do some scouting.

by Danny Kelly on Jan 2, 2012 11:12 AM PST reply actions  

No Thanks

Just a little bit more mobile TJax. We need a quarterback, born and bred. I can get on the Tannehill/Jones bandwagon, especially if we had access to a Payton Manning type FA, getting late in his career and able to mentor said rookie for a year or two in the finer art of NFL Quarterback play. I could even get excited about Matt Flynn. But just another mobile pseudo quarterback? Uh no.

by sdhawk on Jan 2, 2012 11:24 AM PST reply actions  

The thing about Joe Webb is that he has great awareness and won't always run.

Take a look at this play:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuo3OR4qsPM

20 personnel, spread left. Webb sees #12 inching closer, knowing that he will blitz, and probably get through because the right TE is running a route.

Ball is snapped. Webb moves back two steps, and knowing that the defender is there, rolls out to his right immediately, avoid the sack.

By now though, Webb is already running, because he knows the WR at the bottom is running a deep post and the TE on his right is in a curl. This leaves the whole right side of the field open, so he runs for it anyway. Remember, his WR was open the whole time, but knowing that the route will draw the defender away, he scores the TD easy.

"You are the molders of their dreams." - Clark Mollenhoff

by EequalsMc2 on Jan 2, 2012 12:07 PM PST up reply actions  

He starts running once he sees the defender breaking through

Which is while he’s still dropping back. Man that offensive line is bad. It also seems to work primarily because 92 can’t adjust due to injuring himself. Not an example I’d cite to prove awareness.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Just want to clarify that this is not an article that says "We must make Joe Webb our starter next season! I have found the solution!"

Not that you are saying that but just in case anyone gets the idea that I am saying that, then I have not communicated myself well.

Would I make a low-cost move for Joe Webb? Yes, because I think there is a high-reward there. Would I bet the farm on Joe Webb? No, of course not.

I think it can be overlooked that he has two years of college experience, and small UAB, and two years of intermediate NFL experience. And yet he still looks decent out there. Worst case scenario, you have an awesome athlete on your team that would be willing (I believe) to play wide receiver. Nothing wrong with having more athletes.

If the Hawks made a low-cost move to acquire Webb, would I rather have him starting than T-Jack? If those were my ONLY two options? Unless Webb blows it in the pre-season, yes, I’d rather have him than Jackson.

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Jan 2, 2012 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Webb is why we got TJ.

Or why the Vikings let him go.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Jan 2, 2012 11:30 AM PST reply actions  

The Vikings let TJ go because of Ponder and McNabb and because TJ isn't very exciting.

I don’t think the Vikings are going to let him go, but he’s too interesting to not do a write-up on and say “Well, there’s this guy.”

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Jan 2, 2012 11:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Last season TJ came in for Favre, got hurt.

Then Webb finished the season. They decided to keep Webb.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Jan 2, 2012 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

TJ's contract was up, Webb's wasn't

No massive intrigue there.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

People were excited with Webb's play as a development guy at the end of the season.

And they were sick of TJ. Contracts had nothing to do with it.

He’s the Vikings Portis if you will.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Jan 2, 2012 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

It's a bit much to say that contracts had Nothing to do with a player leaving and another player staying.

Of course they want to keep Webb, they like Webb, they should be intrigued about this very cheap, very high character, very athletic player. I guess I just don’t understand what one has to do with the other.

I said that Webb is “not on the market” but I won’t be surprised if the Vikings get calls, and as I said in the article, they should probably listen because they have Ponder and they need a lot of help in a lot of areas. They’ve got two Hall of Fame talents in their prime right now, they should try to win in the next 2-3 years and I’m not sure that Webb will be a part of that. Of course, if they only get offered a 4th round pick, they probably won’t take it.

We’ve got a whole lot of open space to cover stuff in the next four months until the draft and we’re going to look at a lot of possible options. Joe Webb is a player that really intrigues me, so I did a write-up on him. I’m not advocating that the Hawks trade a first round pick for him.

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Jan 2, 2012 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

The reason I say the contracts didn't have anything to do with it,

is they were clearly done with the TJ experiment. He would have been waived even if he had years remaining on his contract.

70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.

by hazbro24 on Jan 3, 2012 6:38 AM PST up reply actions  

But what does that have to do with Joe Webb?

If they were clearly done with TJ, it shouldn’t have anything to do with Webb, like your original statement implied. It would be one thing if it was like “Chargers let Brees walk because of Rivers” but in this case, you’re not really applying any value to Webb and the Vikings because you said “they were clearly done with TJ”

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Jan 3, 2012 8:18 AM PST up reply actions  

The hell he's not

I love me some Joe Webb and he’ll be another quality ex-Viking on IR with the Seahawks in no time!

Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters

by SSreporters on Jan 2, 2012 11:33 AM PST reply actions  

There is nothing in Joe Webb's game that makes me think he is more than a Brad Smith/Josh Cribbs-type player

He has almost none of the assets as a player that I look for in a pro quarterback (pre/post-snap reading ability, arm strength/accuracy, pocket awareness). His sack rate (11 sacks on 152 attempts) is not impressive, though he does have above-average escapability for a running quarterback. He is a very exciting player, but like Tebow, that does not make him a good player. He has a weird sidearm habit that limits his zip, stares down his reads like Tarvaris, doesn’t pass well in motion and rarely re-sets once he’s flushed, so once he’s flushed the play is basically a loss, and he’s flushed quick, with fairly poor pocket presence. His athleticism is incredible, but athleticism has never defined the quarterback position.

The Vikes would be best-served with converting him to an option quarterback/receiver, unless some team really is silly enough to pay a high price for this guy. I would not understand why any team would do that when there are significantly more capable passers (Matt Flynn, Josh Johnson) available as free agents.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 12:02 PM PST reply actions  

Depends on his health.

But if the Colts are willing to let him go then that’s a cautious sign.

"You are the molders of their dreams." - Clark Mollenhoff

by EequalsMc2 on Jan 2, 2012 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

In my view, not really

It’s easy to get caught in a trap with an older, great quarterback, and get into a cycle of being nearly-there. Besides, we’re a young, growing team, Manning would fit the dynamic of a contender better. Then factor in that he may be one injury away from being done and very expensive, and it’s not a very attractive proposition.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

If Hasselbeck has too much pride to sign a two-year contract here, how do you think Manning would feel about it?

He’s not going anywhere unless he’s signed into his 40s.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Kind of a toss-up

Manning strikes me as a pretty humble guy, but at the same time he’s still in the top 5 category of QBs in the league and likely to still be up there when he comes back from his injury. He just signed a huge long-term contract that would likely carry him to the end of his career, but everything he’s said in interviews says that he purposely left the one year clause in it in case the Colts got cold feet regarding his injury.

My guess is that if he’s given a release (and that still seems pretty unlikely), he would be willing to sign a short-term deal, but at the same time there would be far too many teams willing to throw good money at him for 3-5 year deals for it not to be worth his while. It would be nice to get him, but the price and years he would command in a contract would just be too rich for our blood. Too many teams would like him for the relatively long term and I just don’t see us heading in that direction, nor do I see Manning willing to settle for a series of short-term journeyman contracts as long as he has a slew of teams willing to make him the face of the franchise.

"That's funny. I post here all the time and I never see (you) here."
- GreatGoogly, to John Morgan

"John Morgan IS Field Gulls, asshole!"

by Clendy on Jan 2, 2012 9:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I think all teams chasing Manning will have the same philosophy

Which is to balance the risk of age/injury-associated decline, salary cap hit, and an elite QB. Certainly there are a few insane owners and GMs, but self preservation for FO guys will demand some balance in the contract. If indy releases him, there is still a good chance he re-signs a restructured contract with indy anyway. It is likely he gets a 4-5 yr deal, 8-12mil / yr, escalating to 15-18 in year 3, and up to 50% performance bonuses for health and success in the first two years. I can’t imagine any team would offer more than 15 mil guaranteed, and that seems high. That said, Snyder is still insane.

Smashmouth is the new sexy!

by pqlqi on Jan 2, 2012 9:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Are the Skins still running Shanny's offense?

If it’s the same as it has been for a long time, that’s a completely different offense than what Manning is used to. I realize that Manning is Manning, and you’d think he’d be capable of adapting, but I have to wonder if he’s not better somewhere else.

The question is… where? They’d surely want him out of the conference, but I don’t see anyone in the NFC that is a contender that doesn’t already have a QB. In the AFC, I have to think that the Jets would be an amazing fit, with the running game, talent at wide receiver, and supposed “character/leadership” issues there. And you know the NFL would love to get big-name Manning into the New York market. That’s my call.

by djafrot on Jan 3, 2012 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

He should go to New York.

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things."

by shams on Jan 2, 2012 2:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll take an unathletic QB with pocket presence & consistant accuracy & "clutchness,"

to coin a new word for our ever morphing language.

Interesting article, but I hope PC/JS pass on Webb.

(Since we traded for a “Matt” QB from Green Bay with good results, we must do it
again, for, yea, it is written).

by broadbill birdwatcher on Jan 2, 2012 12:16 PM PST reply actions  

We should give the Pack a pick after signing Matt anyway

Just for good luck.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 12:18 PM PST up reply actions   3 recs

I, for one, am all in for making GB Back-ups into our franchise QB's a tradition.

Matt Flynn is a bit Kevin Kolb 2.0 (in a way, few starts that’ll be enough for a team to make him their guy, and the being a free agent part is dif), except he’s been way more impressive with his chances that he’s had. It’d allow the draft to be even more solid, not having to give up capital. BPA. But if not Flynn, I’m hoping capital does go into RG3 ;)

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Another difference between Kolb and Flynn

is that Green Bay has done pretty well in terms of producing quality QBs

whereas I don’t think many would say the same about Philadelphia.

by wyobo on Jan 2, 2012 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I think a bigger difference between the two is familiarity

It’s not like Hasselbeck had a huge resume built up with the Packers, but Holmgren knew him. Schneider doesn’t know Flynn as well, but there’s a familiarity that matters in this consideration. And the cost difference between Flynn and Kolb, considering our cap space, is huge.

I’m not advocating the Flynn scenario yet, I’m doing a writeup (likely 2 or 3-parter) on scouting Flynn soon that’ll hopefully help me make up my mind, but it does seem like a fairly realistic scenario, and for now one I could live with.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 12:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I watched the first couple games he had when he played. I really remember the one against the

Patriots. He just looked really good, and very poised, more poised than you’ll ever see TJack. At this point, I’m okay with taking a shot at him, drafting BPA and giving QB another year of evaluation before “making a splash.” One thing I know, is that T-Jack couldn’t throw 6 TD’s against the worst D in the league if his life depended on it. I know that’s just one game, but given his couple others, there’s much more promise than I’ve ever seen from T-Jack.

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Keep in mind.

We probably have a better receiving corps than the Packers, talent wise.

"You are the molders of their dreams." - Clark Mollenhoff

by EequalsMc2 on Jan 2, 2012 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Better running back (just assuming we resign Lynch). Better Oline (potentially :P), better

offensive line coach. Also seems like he makes the sort of throws that would make BMW a factor in the passing game again. The one obvious better I didn’t point out – defense. Seattle will be a pretty attractive place for any free agent, especially once they see the facilities on top of everything Pete has built so far.

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

No, we really don't

But we do have a better running game, and our OL is better at run-blocking, and potentially better at pass-blocking.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I think a healthy Rice is better than any receiver on GB.

I may be wrong about that, but the talent between the two corps overall seems a bit of a wash.

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Lockette is also intriguing, especially with how he contributed as of late.

That sort of speed you can’t coach, and we saw it put on display in game. He burnt the hell out of a Patrick Peterson sprinting as fast as he could to keep up. Granted, T-Jack ruined the throw. But if we keep that size and speed around, I like what our WRs are developing into.

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Rice is a legit #1 WR

But I’m not sure he is that much better than Jennings, and even if he is, Jordy Nelson and Jermichael Finley make a signfiicant dint.

Also, please don’t bring up Lockette. I saw him brought up by some idiot pundit too. He’s a very raw receiver who will not be ready to play a significant number of snaps for years yet. It’s good to see his athletic potential is for real, but for players to be excited about, he’s well behind Rice, Baldwin and Tate.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

That's why I threw in intriguing when bringing him up. I know he

hasn’t actually proved anything yet, and is still super raw. It’s just what he offers is pretty damn rare. It could still end up pure bust, but that size and speed is definitely rare.

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

It is, and he's definitely an interesting prospect

But if we’re comparing WR groups right now, he’s not a factor in looking at who wins that contest.

Formerly knows as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii

by Thomas Beekers on Jan 2, 2012 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I like it

Gives us a good karma vibe.

"That's funny. I post here all the time and I never see (you) here."
- GreatGoogly, to John Morgan

"John Morgan IS Field Gulls, asshole!"

by Clendy on Jan 2, 2012 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

The only way Joe Webb is even worth it

Is if they will take him in a trade straight-up for Tavaris Jackson.

So this is to say that no way in hell do I want Joe Webb under center for this team.

by wyobo on Jan 2, 2012 12:26 PM PST reply actions  

Anyone other than Tarvaris.

I was against his signing from the moment it was announced. Give me Webb, Flynn, anybody. Tarvaris may not be the worst ever, but I have no hope in his improvement. I had more hope with Whitehurst.

Russell Wilson is intriguing to me despite being undersized. He’ll probably end up playing baseball, though.

by Wilder. on Jan 2, 2012 12:32 PM PST reply actions  

Flynn is not Kolb 2.0

Flynn can throw the ball fairly accurate with out having to set his feet. Something Kolb struggles with. I wouldnt mind at all if Seattle signed Flynn. Huge up grade over TJ

by Redzone59 on Jan 2, 2012 1:54 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

When I said 2.0, I wasn't talking about similarities as a player at all.

I just meant that moreso as a player that saw his stock raise substantially after a few starts. Does Arizona make that deal without the limited game time they see in Kolb? And had Rogers started the last game of the season over Flynn, do you see his hype and stock being equal to what it would have been entering the offseason? It just seems similar (albiet different) to what happened with Kolb. Just that Flynn is a FA and Kolb was still under contract. Besides, Flynn was way more impressive in his 3 starts. So 2.0 also represents an upgrade :P

by twocolorcrayon on Jan 2, 2012 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Got it

I have always thought Flynn was the better choice between the two..,

by Redzone59 on Jan 2, 2012 6:52 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Joe Webb would make a great QB for the Hawks

If we were playing Madden, where things like “reading a defense” and “accuracy” aren’t that important.

We don’t need to make a move for another bridge QB…we need someone who has potential to be the guy. Based on a small sample size, I’m intrigued by Josh Portis in the same way you are about Webb. Portis is already on the roster and cheap.

by DeepHeat on Jan 2, 2012 2:47 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Just want to say again that I'm not advocating for Webb as the Hawks next franchise QB. He's just some who looks really interesting.

The other point I want to make is that I’m not sure how you can be just as intrigued by a player who has never come close to playing in an NFL game and Joe Webb has several starts, led a couple of comebacks in relief for Minnesota, and has an extra year of experience in the NFL.

Josh Portis is interesting, but the only thing that anyone has to go off of is some pre-season play and hearsay. Period. If anyone here works for the Seahawks and wants to share more about Portis, I’d love to hear it. Is Joe Webb better than Portis? I have no freaking idea, because Portis has never played a meaningful snap. Maybe.

follow @casetines

by Kenneth Arthur on Jan 2, 2012 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

My biggest concern at the quarterback position is Pete Carroll and his belief in Tavaris Jackson

I would cut TJ and draft 2 quarterbacks. There would be a 3-way fight for the starting job. We already know what we have now.

by Richard fg7 on Jan 2, 2012 5:29 PM PST reply actions  

PC

Is going to beleave in whatever the best option is in his roster. Regardless of how good or bad that option is. That’s called leadership. PC knows T Jax isn’t the answer… He’s been around way to long not to know that. Taking all things into consideration T Jax was a good option for this year and maybe next but if they do go after Flynn, T Jax won’t be the starter come the regular season.

by Redzone59 on Jan 2, 2012 6:57 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

BRING ON THE FLYNN!!!

Heresy grows from idleness.
Check out my story at Fanfiction.net
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7456440/1/Tide_of_War_Mass_Effect_Warhammer_Crossover

by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 3, 2012 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SEA!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The OT Thread---12thrs, Assemble!
Small
Just How Much Do Close Games Matter Anyway?
Small
Help Me Understand How Irvin Will be Used
Turbin_game_uni_small
Hand Size and Quarterbacks
Einstein_www-txt2pic-com_small
On Pete Carroll and Previous QB Competitions

Recent FanPosts

Horsey_small
Results from the 2012 Armchair GM Championship
Tasb_logo_small
Consider it Spun: The 5 Worst Moves of Carroll and Schneider Era in Seattle
Small
Plaxico Burress: viable option, or over the hill?
Small
Portland Seahawks Fans: Where You Be?
Small
Should Seattle Go After Kellen Winslow?
Small
Football where the head is sacred

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor/Lead Writer

Screen_shot_2012-05-04_at_10 Danny Kelly

Staff Writers/Editors

Screen_shot_2011-01-05_at_9 Scruffy Lefty

Small BrianL

Avatar_small Benne

Olympiabeer_small Tyler Jorgensen

Madhatter_small Thomas Beekers

Profilepic_small DJ C-Raig

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

Sbn_pic_small Jacson Bevens

Photo__1__small Charlie Todaro

Staff Writers

Small Joshua Kasparek

Photo_small Matt Erickson

Davis_small Davis Hsu

Profile2_small Rob Staton

208114_505637750968_23709013_30160241_9483_n_small Scott Enyeart

Elephant_pink_clothes_small Chris Sully

Seattle_seahawk_white_1600_reasonably_small_small Derek Stephens

Ace_small Ben Harbaugh

Bu_fb_2_small Daniel Hill

Rob_small Rob Davies