Seattle Seahawks 2011 Season: A Look Back at the Defense
Pretty much any way you cut the cake, the Seahawks had a top-10 defense in the NFL this season. As far as traditional stats go, they were 9th in the NFL (which is saying something, considering how bad their offense was to start), surrendering 332 yards per game to opposing offenses. They were 7th in the NFL with 16.7 points given up per game. 11th in passing yards per game at 219 yards per game, 4th in yards per attempt on the ground at 3.8.
In terms of advanced statistics - the Seahawks finished 10th in the league in both the normal and weighted DVOA and surprisingly their pass defense ranked above their run D - 9th and 11th, respectively. They were fairly consistent throughout the year as well - 11th in total variance by DVOA in the NFL. This is encouraging, as this performance carried over against good teams and bad.
For comparison, one year ago, the Seahawks gave up 4.2 yards per carry (21st in NFL), 249 yards per game through the air (27th), they surrendered 368 yards per game to opposing offenses (27th) and they were generally considered in the group of 'worst defenses in the NFL' for most of the year. DVOA backed this up as they were ranked 29th in the NFL overall, 32nd in weighted DVOA - meaning their efficiency declined as the year went on and towards the end were the worst defense in the whole league. Their pass defense was ranked 29th on the year and their run defense 17th.
What a difference a year can make, seriously. The Hawks got some help with upgrades at a few spots - most notably on the defensive line ... actually, nevermind, pretty much every position on the defense got upgraded.
The defensive line saw the return of Red Bryant and Brandon Mebane to full and consistent health. Alan Branch was a key pickup and replaced Colin Cole and Craig Terrill, and as far as I can tell, played well. Chris Clemons proved that his '10 season wasn't a total fluke and racked up 11 sacks again, and key backups Clinton McDonald and Anthony Hargrove got some quality minutes.
The linebacker corps changed significantly - David Hawthorne replaced a departed Lofa Tatupu in the middle, K.J. Wright filled in for a departed Aaron Curry, and LeRoy Hill took back his old spot on the outside. This trio played well enough - though not perfect by any stretch were an improvement over last year's corps. Depth was provided infrequently by Malcolm Smith and in nickel situations Roy Lewis spelled Wright.
Cornerback saw probably the most significant upgrade as Kelly Jennings and Marcus Trufant were supplanted by Brandon Browner and Walter Thurmond briefly, then Richard Sherman for the rest of the season. Browner and Sherman excelled in their roles, relative to their predecessors anyway, and the stats showed this.
Earl Thomas reprised his role as the best player on the defense and quietly had himself an All-Pro caliber season. Next to him, Kam Chancellor emerged as not only a viable starter, but a possible future star.
People would say that the Seahawks biggest weakness was at pressuring the quarterback as they finished 19th in the league in sacks - the most readily accessible measure for that. I haven't seen the number for 'pressures' yet but it's probably safe to say the Hawks weren't near the top in this category. The eye test would tell you though that opposing quarterbacks consistently had too much time.
The run defense held up well as the year went on and though they gave up chunks of yardage to some smaller backs towards the end of the year, their YPC average remained pretty respectable along the way. The pass defense was the real surprise and when you consider that the main tenets of the defense that is being installed are to limit the big play and stop the run, they succeeded more often than not.
The Seahawks tied for 2nd in the league with only 43 plays of 20+ yards through the air and 6th in the NFL in run plays of 20 or more yards, surrendering 8 of those. There were a few key slip-ups, but that will happen on any NFL team.
Overall, my personal confidence level in the Seahawks defense is vastly superior to that of last year, obviously. Last year, the Seahawks were very consistently slower, less athletic, and overmatched at pretty much every position, and a slow feeling of dread would creep into my stomach every time they took the field. Not so this season.
For the most part, I felt very confident in what the defense could do this season and in a number of games, they imposed their will on teams. They were more physical, more athletic, and more nasty than their opponents at times. The produced turnovers - the Seahawks had 22 interceptions (12 last year), 13 forced fumbles and 9 recoveries. They scored 4 touchdowns. The scary (and exciting) part of this defensive roster that has been put together is that if the offense can stay on the field more consistently and put some points up on the board going forward, the defense will only get better.
The other scary (and exciting) part of this defense is that it's been built, mostly, from mid-round draft picks, free agent acquisitions, and other teams' castaways. Earl Thomas is the lone first round pick and Alan Branch is the close second as an early 2nd rounder. Apart from that you've got mid-rounders in Red Bryant, Brandon Mebane, K.J. Wright, Richard Sherman, Walter Thurmond, and Kam Chancellor. You've got veteran leadership in LeRoy Hill, Chris Clemons and David Hawthorne, a former 3rd round pick, and two former UDFAs, respectively. Finally, you have a Pro-Bowl alternate in Brandon Browner, that you signed off the street last year.
The upside here is that an infusion of so-called 'elite' talent at a few key spots could mean good things for the continued improvement and I wouldn't be surprised to see a defense-heavy draft in April. But we're not talking about the future here, just the past. So, for now, I'll be satisfied with a season that saw marked improvement of the defense and the emergence of several players that look to be mainstays with the club for years to come. The identity of toughness was forged and an ability to lean on depth was established. In short, 'the plan' started to emerge and show some promise.
The questions of the viability of the 4-3 and a run-stopping focus remain and the lack of pass rush is still a concern. Age is creeping up on the linebacker corps and it still remains to be seen if Browner and Sherman can repeat their solid performances going forward. Can the Hawks get to the quarterback? Can they improve in their coverage of tight ends and running backs? Can they clean up the penalties? There are still a lot of questions. As you probably realize, the Seahawks did luck out in facing a few backup quarterbacks along the way so there is still a great, great deal of room for improvement. In terms of a one-year upgrade and upside though, I'm not complaining.
Though we'll look back at individual players as the off-season goes on, I'm excited to turn my focus down the road. In my next few posts, I'll start looking to next year and we can begin talking about what this roster will look like going forward.
62 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Infusion of elite talent"
slobber. This defense kills (yes, KILLS) opponents with a monster pass rusher.
Heresy grows from idleness.
Why get Matt Flynn?
"Also, for what it’s worth, if we get Flynn, New England and Detroit are on the schedule!" - SSreporters
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 23, 2012 1:29 PM PST reply actions
Cautiously optimistic about the defense
The secondary I think was tied for 2nd with SF in INTs and our CBs had 11 INTs to the whopping — and I kid you not — 2 INTs (1 Jennings and 1 Trufant).
However, can anyone do a breakdown as to why the run D turned to crap the last month of the season? They were struggling with the Redskins, Eagles, Rams, 49ers, and Cardinals all to end the season. I think they gave up at least 130+ yds rushing in all of those. Could it just be superior RBs or the D-line tiring out?
Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters
Offenses figured out we were vulnerable off-tackle.
This is a big reason why Pete wants more team speed on defense.
by Ben Harbaugh on Jan 23, 2012 1:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
More team speed
at the LB position and an elite pass rushing DE are two large areas of opportunity for us.
The smaller RB and fast TE kill our defense.
Branch seems to be more easily replaced than Bryant or Clemons
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jan 23, 2012 2:15 PM PST up reply actions
why the hate on hill
he’s done a good job.
@ben harbaugh – thanks good comment
i think we just need some quality backups. we have no real depth and its one or two injry from falling apart
Hill and Hawthorne just feel like "stopgaps"
They are good enough for now. But definitely worth upgrading, especially Hill.
follow @casetines
by Kenneth Arthur on Jan 24, 2012 8:44 AM PST up reply actions
I'd much rather have Hill come back than Hawthorne.
by Nate Dogg on Jan 24, 2012 12:33 PM PST via Android app up reply actions
I have nothing against him, and would like him to return.
His position is easier to fill than Hawthorne’s, so he’ll likely be the first gone.
We already have Hawthorne's replacement on the roster
So i’m gonna disagree with that statement.
You touched on it later on in the piece
But it seems to me the biggest obstacle we need to clear is that of box scheme. It seems as though we’ve hit the ceiling of the LEO defense, as there is no position that can be seriously upgraded, save for maybe a linebacker spot.
I’m in favor of switching to a more traditional 4-3 or 3-4, or both. We have the talent to be able to run both (as I recall we put in some 3-4 packages in some later games this year, which seemed to have done us well) and we can use the advantages of a 4-3 one week and 3-4 in another.
by Heaven for the Air, Hell for the Company on Jan 23, 2012 1:47 PM PST reply actions
I don't think the LEO scheme has hit it's ceiling for pass rush.
A dynamic, pass-rushing 3-tech or OLB could do the trick and a deeper rotation of LEOs for passing downs would also help.
by Ben Harbaugh on Jan 23, 2012 1:58 PM PST up reply actions
Yup
We’re not really getting much pressure at all from the interior right now and the pass-rush contributions of the 3-tech are a big part of the scheme.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jan 23, 2012 2:10 PM PST up reply actions
Well
wouldn’t obtaining a dynamic pass-rushing 3-tech or OLB take away from the run game? It just seems as though we can’t get much better at rushing the passer unless we get worse at stopping the run. Either that or just obtain elite talent at all positions, which of course would solve all problems, but yeah.
by Heaven for the Air, Hell for the Company on Jan 23, 2012 2:21 PM PST up reply actions
I don't think it's be a one to one exchange.
They could give up a little in run defense and get a big return in pass rush. A dynamic, pass rushing 3-tech probably isn’t as good against the run as Branch, but he can still be good there.
So the argument to be made is that if you want to get better, get better players
Sounds easy enough I guess
by Heaven for the Air, Hell for the Company on Jan 23, 2012 8:32 PM PST up reply actions
By running a defensive scheme that is rare/unique in the NFL
Leaves me (and I presume other fans) wondering whether the FO spotted some vastly under-rated players on the DL, or simply have a scheme that suits the players we have – ones with non-standard talents in NFL terms. I don’t think back in August anyone was excited about snatching Branch, Hargrove & McDonald,from under the noses of, erm, no other teams, but by now it looks like the FO made three good deals.
the point of the 4-3 under leo is that by changing one player on the field you can shift
into a full 4-3 or a full 3-4. We saw all of these looks this year. The front 7 personnel and formation are both quite fluid through the game, and with more speed at LB and another disruptive DL, will become even moreso
Smashmouth is the new sexy!
Hmm.
Still though, have we maxed out our talent and thus to improve we would need to bring in a bunch of top notch talent in order to get that much better?
I just saw Rob Staton’s latest post. In it he wrote a little bit about the 3-4 idea, basically saying that while this draft class may not be apt for improving the front seven, it can be done. He also said that the previous scheme relied too much on the leo concept and did not explore other ideas for box alignment nearly enough, making Clemons the only viable pass rusher.
by Heaven for the Air, Hell for the Company on Jan 23, 2012 3:53 PM PST up reply actions
We dont need a complete DE, or OLB
Just one that can get to the QB in passing situations. Those are not easy to find but not too hard either.
Pierre-paul was considered a big reach at 10.
Aldon smith was projected as low as 32.
Also, with out researching it, it seems its much easier to find a situational pass rushing DE/OLB than a 3 tech that can create any kind of pressure.
Watching our defensive line at the end of the year
They were great at holding their position, but don’t ask them to run after the QB or a running back. They prefer to wait for the runner to come to them. The few times they chased a QB like Alex Smith they were huffing and puffing after 10 yards.
I was so glad to be wrong on this defense
It was the lack of pass rush coupled with lack of experience in the secondary that had me worried. Pass rush did indeed lack, but the secondary made up for so, so much, primarily the safeties and Sherman. Browner just got picked on a lot. Still, it was much better than I’d feared.
It’s still schematically dubious. Upgrade the LBs, upgrade the 3-tech, and you can play more of a Kiffin-style penetrating offense that fits the strengths of the press-man scheme better. If we stick to one-gap-and-hold, reactive play, we’ve probably hit our ceiling regardless of talent infusion.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 3:00 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
This Secondary with a Pass Rush
If we were able to add a talented DE to this defense, the secondary could really be something. Add some speed at LB and defense could really become a strength of our team.
Of the FA that are available, who would you want to add to our defense? I think Mario Williams would be an excellent player for us, as would Cliff Avril. Either would improve us.
Mario Williams is a dream, so I'm not really considering him a realistic option
We need a real 3-tech next to Mebane a lot more than we need a DE upgrade. LB upgrades aren’t just all about speed, unless we grow much closer to the 3-4.
But as Rob Staton points out, this isn’t a strong draft for upgrades at any of these spots. So I don’t know how much we can do.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 4:10 PM PST up reply actions
What's on the FA market?
Guys like Justin Smith, Cullen Jenkins and Chris Canty hit the FA market with some regularity.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jan 23, 2012 4:19 PM PST up reply actions
Mario Williams, Cliff Avril, Jason Jones, Michael Bennett, maybe Calais Campbell if you can think of a fit
Robert Mathis if you don’t mind the age.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 4:47 PM PST up reply actions
Free Agency and Salary Cap rules
Personally, I don’t have a problem with the age of most FA’s, but I think our FO does. We are the second youngest team in the league and any FA additions will raise our average age. That is amazing.
It is my understanding that we need to spend some money for the 2013 year anyways. With the current cap rules, aren’t we about $20 million under the cap from 2011 and thus that is rolled into credits for this year? I thought I read that we could also carry that cap space over to 2013, but that year would have a floor forcing us to raise our salaries. How does the carry over cap space work in relation to the salary floor in 2013?
I don't know where you're getting any of this from, but it's wrong
2012 season has no cap floor, soft or hard, at all. Nothing rolls over.
For the years following 2013, there’s two 4-year periods. In those periods, there are minimum cash spending boundaries. You don’t have to hit them in any single year, and if you’re under after four years, the team then pays up the difference to the NFLPA to distribute among players. You don’t have to be above a hard cap or cash floor in any single season.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 6:06 PM PST up reply actions
Thanks Thomas - a Long question.
That’s what I get for watching ESPN.
I read your write up and it did bring up one question. As I understand what you wrote, the first actual salary floor will start in the 2013 season and go for 4 years with a floor equal to 89% of the combined NFL salary cap numbers for the 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 seasons.
So, for the sake of arguement, if that cap numbers were 125M, 130M, 135M and 140M for those four years, the team would have had to pay out at least 471.7M (89% of the combined cap numbers) in player salaries over that 4 year period. If a team paid only 450M, 21.7M would need to then be paid out. My question is, who gets the money? Would it be evenly divided among all players on the rosters over that 4 year period?
Your article stated that the NFLPA would determine the allocation, but isn’t the NFL setting itself up for a huge number or greivances if players don’t like how the NFLPA decides to allocate the money?
The process is not defined in the CBA
I would guess the NFLPA looks at playing and contract time and uses that to determine who gets how much. The NFL basically gives the money to the player union to figure out what to do with. If players are unhappy about it, that’s not really the NFL’s problem, they’re separate institutions, and this process has been set in this contract.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 7:22 PM PST up reply actions
is anyone doing a piece on these guys especially cliff
detroit seems to be high on him. they have such a deep dline i am envious of them
I might, if I find the time.
Scouting players from other teams isn’t easy though. At least I don’t do college scouting.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 24, 2012 1:57 AM PST up reply actions
Three tech possibilities
Jason Jones and Jamaal Anderson are also available. Shaun Rogers was also someone John Morgan was high on last year.
Here's a list of FA DL from Rotoworld:
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Jan 23, 2012 4:37 PM PST reply actions
We have some interesting guys on the roster that could help bring pressure from LB.
Besides Dexter Davis and Smith , Mike Morgan has 4.4 speed & a knack for getting to the quarterback. I would bet they figure it out and we see another big jump in defense next year. I’ve come to expect good things from PC/JS.
by Richard fg7 on Jan 23, 2012 4:44 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
More cautious optimism
I’ve loved the analysis and discussion offered here for years. I finally decided to offer up my two cents worth.
There seems to be a general optimism by most posters for continued improvement in our defense for next season. Although I’m very happy with their performance for 2011, I’m not convinced we should just assume further improvement for 2012.
As Danny pointed out, there is the question as to the quality of the quarterbacks faced this season. I’m not sure we can count on another dismal list for 2012. The consensus opinion is we need to upgrade our pass rush. However, this year’s draft doesn’t seem to excite most observers, especially for an every down lineman to bring pressure up the middle. Then there is the concern with integrating greater outside pressure within the existing defensive scheme. I think these points have been made before.
What I haven’t seen is an acknowledgement that this season’s defense was blessed with near perfect health. Other than losing Trufant, which may have been a blessing in disguise, I don’t believe we lost another defensive starter for an extended period, much less placed on IR. That’s an anomaly I’ll take but it has me tempering my optimism for an improvement in 2012.
Yeah, but when Thurmond went out, Roy Lewis came in
I believe Thurmond would’ve been better in slot coverage but can’t offer a ton of evidence on that since he’s not played that many games. Still, Lewis is not a bad slot corner.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 5:56 PM PST up reply actions
It is unfortunate the when I think "Roy Lewis" I have this recurring image of Helu hurdling him stuck in my head.
Long suffering, committed Seahawks/Packers fan
Starter
Didn’t Thurnmond become the starter after Trufant went down? Regardless, we had an incredibly health defensive unit. I’m not sure we can count on that kind of “luck.” Thankfully we didn’t see a repeat of 2010 or what happened to the o-line this season.
Excellent point on the healthy D.
Although having five guys in the secondary with one year of NFL experience between them is a big obstacle. Of course, the comparative injury history of the Seahawks from years past might also make this season shine by comparison.
It's certainly not something we should rely on another year
Injuries tend to regress to the mean. The mean, in this case, is more than “not losing any valuable starters”.
If we lose Earl, the entire defense falls apart, in my opinion.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 23, 2012 7:24 PM PST up reply actions
Who's his backup, anyway?
Heresy grows from idleness.
Why get Matt Flynn?
"Also, for what it’s worth, if we get Flynn, New England and Detroit are on the schedule!" - SSreporters
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 23, 2012 7:27 PM PST up reply actions
Bigby? Johnson?
They have no one similar to ET, just generic backup safeties. LeGree was supposed to be that guy.
Jeron Johnson has a few fans on this site
not quite ‘Teel’ cult status, but he’s got his share. I wonder if he’s still with the Hawks, didn’t he appear on ST during the regular season at some point?
Heresy grows from idleness.
Why get Matt Flynn?
"Also, for what it’s worth, if we get Flynn, New England and Detroit are on the schedule!" - SSreporters
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 23, 2012 7:31 PM PST up reply actions
He was on the 53 all year and, yeah, played special teams.
I don’t know how often he was inactive. He might be a fine safety in the making, but I don’t think he has a similar skill set to Thomas.
Yes, definitely not, seemed more like the bit hit safety to me, not the rover that ET is
Heresy grows from idleness.
Why get Matt Flynn?
"Also, for what it’s worth, if we get Flynn, New England and Detroit are on the schedule!" - SSreporters
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 23, 2012 7:35 PM PST up reply actions
big
Heresy grows from idleness.
Why get Matt Flynn?
"Also, for what it’s worth, if we get Flynn, New England and Detroit are on the schedule!" - SSreporters
by Corax --Nevermore-- on Jan 23, 2012 7:36 PM PST up reply actions
Indeed he doesn't
I think he’s comparable to that Colts safety, Bob Sanders. Not huge, not fast, but plays smart and hits hard. He definitely couldn’t replace Thomas, he’s way too slow.
Formerly known as Vasilii, follow me on twitter @dolgorukii
by Thomas Beekers on Jan 25, 2012 2:41 AM PST up reply actions
He's not Teel or Reed status,
because he can actually play. He’d be fighting for the starting job if there wasn’t an all pro in front of him.
70% of space is covered by dark matter, the rest by ET.
Huh. I would say the irreplacables are still Bryant and Mebane.
Thankfully both were healthy this season. But I can see the case for Earl.
After the 2007 season, I thought the Seahawks' defense was trending upwards.
They had what was arguably a top 10 defense that year, too. Very solid against both the run and in the pass rushing department. Despite that, they had some exploitable weaknesses. There was room for growth, and they were a maybe a dominant DT away from being elite. Then 2008 happened.
I feel the same this year, but my optimism is more palpable. I believe in Pete Carroll’s vision and I believe he is going to accomplish what he is setting out to do: Build a championship-contending team every year.
The difference there is age.
We’re young and big. In 2008 we were old and small.
by WestCoastBias. on Jan 23, 2012 8:48 PM PST up reply actions
Yep. After four years, they're still a dominant DT away.
Some of us have been pining for longer than that.
by Groundhog on Jan 24, 2012 1:12 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for the write up!
Rec’d for a good read.

by 

































