FanPost

How about a rule change that doesn't benefit the QB?

I have always been a fan of good defense in the NFL. Defense is always harder to play because you are reacting to what the offensive player does and trying to make up for that split second. That and big hits, I really love big, legal, hard hits. The NFL's trend of rule changes seems to me like they all give the advantage to the QB. I know player safety is paramount, and I totally agree with that but I think Rodger Goodell is on pace to put flags on the QB before 2020. As much as I enoy watching Tom Brady breaking his passing yardage record every other year, I think it is time for a rule change that actually benefits the defense.


I bring up Tom Brady because it is the stupid Tom Brady rule ( AKA Tuck Rule) that made me think of this particular rule change. Last Sunday vs the Rams, the Seahawks had a sack fumble that was returned for a TD called back due to the tuck rule. Bradford was hit hard enough to force him to drop the ball. While he was getting folded up like a lawn chair his arm appeared to be moving forward ever so slightly while the rest of his body was thrown backwards. It was ruled a fumble on the field because it obviously he was not trying to throw, but when you use the super slow motion replay the arm was moving slightly forward. I hate that rule! I have always hated that rule!! I have hated that rule ever since it was first called to bail out Tom Brady in the playoffs.

I got to thinking instead of just getting rid of the Tuck rule why not take it one step further. What if all passes that didn't cross the line of scrimmage or land out of bounds become live balls? Forwards or backwards or sideways. All passes that land in the backfield are live balls. Dropped or incomplete screens, balls that are batted down by linemen, and yes even QBs that were hit as they threw. Would that totally ruin the game or make it more of a level playing field again? I think teams would adjust pretty quickly to it and turnovers wouldn't jump up by that much. I just want to see a DE who has been battling a LT all game and finally gets to the ball rewarded. I don't think the QB should ever get bailed out in that situation. Is it a bad idea? Do you guys have any better ideas for rule changes?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Field Gulls

You must be a member of Field Gulls to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Field Gulls. You should read them.

Join Field Gulls

You must be a member of Field Gulls to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Field Gulls. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker